DOCSLIB.ORG

Koa) and Acacia Koaia (Koai'a

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Koa) and Acacia Koaia (Koai'a April 2006 Species Profiles for Pacific Island Agroforestry ver. 3 www.traditionaltree.org Acacia koa (koa) and Acacia koaia (koai‘a) Fabaceae (legume family) koa (Acacia koa) koai‘a, koai‘e (Acacia koaia) Craig R. Elevitch, Kim M. Wilkinson, and J. B. Friday IN BRIEF h C Distribution Endemic to the major Hawai- vit ian islands of Hawai‘i, Moloka‘i, Maui, Lāna‘i, E O‘ahu, and Kaua‘i. Size Typically attains heights of 15–25 m (50–80 ft) with a canopy spread of 6–12 m (20–40 ft). El C. photo: Habitat Native to a wide elevation range of 100–2300 m (330–7500 ft) (recommended for planting only above 610 m [2000 ft]), with an- nual rainfall of 850–5000 mm (34–200 in). Vegetation Associated with dozens of other native species. Soils Requires well drained soils. Koa stands on shallow soils are not as productive as those on deep soils and may be short-lived. Growth rate Can grow faster than 1.5 m (5 ft) per year in height for the first 5 years in favor- able environments. Main agroforestry uses Wildlife habitat, silvo- pastoral systems, ornamental. Main products Timber. Yields Projected yields of 90–180 m3/ha (6.5– 13 mbf/acre) may be possible in pure stands in 30–50 years; much less in open-grown stands in pastures or in mixed stands in natural forests. Intercropping Difficult to integrate with an- nual crops due to koa’s aggressive surface root system that competes with crops, while also susceptible to damage by human, animal, and machine traffic. Invasive potential Poses a small risk of being invasive if introduced outside of Hawai‘i. Large koa trees such as this in South Kona, Hawai‘i, have mostly disappeared due to logging and land clearing. INTRODUCTION DISTRIBUTION Acacia koa, known worldwide as koa, is the largest native tree of the Hawaiian Islands. It can reach heights in excess Native range of 35 m (115 ft), although more commonly trees reach about Koa is endemic to all major Hawaiian Islands (Hawai‘i, 15 m (50 ft) in height at maturity. Koa is very important to Moloka‘i, Maui, Lāna‘i, O‘ahu, Kaua‘i), at 100–2300 m the ecology, economy, and culture of Hawai‘i. Koa trees in (300–7500 ft) elevation. natural ecosystems provide habitat for many birds, insects, and plants, some endangered. As a nitrogen-fixing species, Current distribution koa plays an important role in forest fertility. A key tra- Scattered remnants of koa forests are still found on the ditional use of koa logs by early Hawaiians was to build main Hawaiian Islands, mostly in upland areas. The health- canoes. The resurgence of interest in Hawaiian voyaging iest and largest populations grow at elevations of 900–1800 and racing vessels using traditional materials has led to a m (2950–5900 ft). New plantings are taking place in agri- greater public awareness of the scarcity of trees suitable for cultural and former pasture areas, primarily above 610 m “canoe koa” and the importance of renewing this depleted (2000 ft). resource. Commercially, koa is Hawai‘i’s premier timber, and cur- BOTANICAL DESCRIPTION rently one of the most expensive woods in the world. It is utilized for furniture, veneer, and crafts. Most commer- cial koa is harvested from remnant individuals or stands in Preferred scientific name pasture land. Efforts in the private and public sectors are Acacia koa Gray being made to re-establish koa, either through fostering natural regeneration (through the removal of livestock and Family occasionally scarifying the ground to expose buried koa Fabaceae (legume family) seeds), or by planting seedlings. There are many unknowns regarding the cultivation and management of koa for com- Subfamily mercial timber. Private landholders sometimes choose to Mimosoideae plant koa for the ecosystem and heritage value, while rec- ognizing that as a financial investment the outcome of koa Non-preferred scientific names reforestation is highly uncertain. Acacia hawaiiensis (Rock) Degener & I. Degener Koa trees once thrived in areas as low as 90 m (300 ft) A. heterophylla Willd. var. latifolia Benth. in elevation. However, pests and diseases currently limit A. kauaiensis Hillebr. koa’s optimal range to elevations above 610 m (2000 ft). Acacia koaia is a closely related species previously classified Hawai‘i’s highly variable climate means that matching an as a subspecies of A. koa (Wagner et al. 1999) appropriate seed source to the site conditions is important to foster a viable koa planting. Koa is a large, fast-growing tree with an aggressive root system. As such, its uses for interplanting with crops are limited. It is recommended that crops be planted no closer than 10–12 m (33–40 ft) to mature trees. However, many kinds of herbaceous plants can thrive in the dappled shade cast by koa. The proliferation of this species is desirable within Hawai‘i. However, as a fast-growing ni- trogen-fixing tree with long-lived seeds and the ability to regenerate after fire, koa may have po- tential as a problematic invasive species outside its native range. Current remnant areas of koa (after Whitesell 1990). Acacia koa (koa) Common names with 12–24 pairs of leaflets. Mature trees have no true leaves, koa (worldwide) but only sickle-shaped phyllodes (flattened leaf stalks) 7–25 cm (2.8–10 in) long and 0.5–2.5 cm (0.2–1 in) wide. GENERAL DESCRIPTION Seeds Seeds are contained within a pod (legume) 15–20 cm (6–8 Size in) long, containing 6–12 seeds. Koa can grow to over 35 m (115 ft) in height but more com- monly reaches heights of 15–25 m (50–80 ft) with a canopy Rooting habit spread of 6–12 m (20–40 ft). Some populations are much Koa has an extensive, shallow, and lateral-spreading root smaller, with a shrub-like form. system that can often be seen on the soil surface, just under the leaf mulch. Roots can sucker, particularly when they Form are damaged or the tree experiences stress. The form of trees is highly variable, ranging from an upright, single trunk to low and sprawling with multiple trunks. How to distinguish from similar species/look- alikes Flowers Sickle-shaped phyllodes (“leaves”) at maturity distinguish Pale yellow, borne in axillary racemes with spherical heads it from “haole koa” (Leucaena leucocephala); larger stature, about 8.5 mm (0.33 in) in diameter. Flowering peaks in mid larger phyllodes, and paler yellow and larger flowers dis- to late winter. Flowers are produced throughout the year, tinguish it from Formosan koa (Acacia confusa); longer starting when the tree is 2–3 years of age. sickle-shaped phyllodes distinguish it from Australian blackwood (Acacia melanoxylon), which is also usually a Leaves much straighter-stemmed tree; and its much larger stat- Young seedlings have bipinnately compound true leaves ure and larger phyllodes distinguish it from its close rela- Left [scale: ⅓ size]: Young koa trees have true leaves (on left). At about 6–9 months of age, trees begin producing flattened, elongated leaf stems called phyllodes (on right) instead of true leaves. Right: Flowering branch tip. photos: C. ElEvitCh Species Profiles for Pacific Island Agroforestry (www.traditionaltree.org) et al. 1999). Acacia koa var. koa occurs on all the main islands. Koa trees with characteristics in between Acacia koa and A. koaia (koai‘a) occur on Kaua‘i (Wagner et al. 1999). Isozyme studies have shown differences between Hawai‘i island populations of koa and the populations of the other Hawaiian islands (Conkle 1996). ASSOCIATED PLANT SPECIES Koa is the second most important and wide- spread tree in Hawaiian forests after ‘ōhi‘a lehua (Metrosideros polymorpha). While koa may oc- casionally occur in pure stands, usually the spe- cies is found in mixed forests where ‘ōhi‘a lehua predominates. On mesic sites, the koa canopy may also be shared with a‘e (Sapindus saponaria) and naio (Myoporum sandwicense). A wide vari- ety of native understory trees are found in koa forests, including naio, ‘ōlapa (Cheirodendron Root suckering (on left) occurs frequently when a tree is severely stressed trigynum), kāwa‘u (Ilex anomala), kōlea (Myr- (on right) or when surface roots are damaged. photo: C. ElEvitCh sine lessertiana), kōpiko (Psychotria spp.), ‘iliahi (Santalum spp., sandalwood), olopua (Nestegis tive koai‘a (Acacia koaia). The rare koai‘a is a shorter tree sandwicensis), and pilo (Coprosma spp.). In wetter sites, tree with a bushy, often gnarled habit, primarily of drier areas ferns (Cibotium spp.) may be prominent in the understory, of Kaua‘i, Moloka‘i, Lāna‘i, Maui, and Hawai‘i (see koai‘a while other species of ferns such as palapalai (Microlepia section below). strigosa) and Dryopteris wallichiana cover the ground. The native Hawaiian raspberry or ‘ākala (Rubus hawaiensis) GENETICS and the shrub māmaki (Pipturus albidus) are also common in the understory of koa forests. At higher elevations the Variability of species forest gradually becomes dominated by māmane (Sophora chrysophylla) (Mueller-Dombois and Fosberg 1998). Today, Koa is a highly variable species in tree form, wood quality, many koa forests consist of scattered old trees in rangelands and environmental tolerances. Populations on the island of dominated by kikuyu grass (Pennisetum clandestinum). Hawai‘i tend to be larger trees with broad (2.5 cm [1 in]) phyllodes and long, straight boles, whereas populations on other islands tend to be shorter trees with narrower and more curved phyllodes. Wood colors vary from blonde to red to deep brown, sometimes showing curl or fiddleback. Growth rates, leaf shape, and bole form have been shown to be highly heritable (Sun 1996).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Handbook Publication.Pub
    Table of Contents Maui County’s Landscape and Gardening Handbook Xeriscaping in Maui County ................................................................. 1 Planning and Design................................................................................................................. 1 Hydro-zones.............................................................................................................................. 1 Plant Selection and the Maui jkCounty Planting Zones............................................................ 2 Soil Preparation ........................................................................................................................ 4 Mulching.................................................................................................................................... 5 Irrigation .................................................................................................................................... 5 Maintenance ............................................................................................................................. 7 Other Interesting Techniques for the Ambitious ..................................... 8 Xeriscape Ponds....................................................................................................................... 8 Aquaponics in the Backyard ..................................................................................................... 9 Water Polymer Crystals ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tree Spacing Is Per the City and County of Honolulu, Department of Parks and Recreation, Division of Urban Forestry - Street Tree Specifications
    Recommended Industry Standard Plant Spacing Guidelines TREES: Canopy Spread Street Tree No. Common Botanical Small Medium Large Height Spacing WRA Comments 1 `A`ali`i Dodonaea viscosa X < 30' 25 NL 2 `Ohai Ali`i Caesalpinia pulcherrima X < 20' 25 5 3 `Ohi`a Lehua Metrosideros polymorpha X 80' - 100' 40 NL 4 Alahe`e Psydrax odorata X 3' - 30' 25 NL 5 Autograph Clusia rosea X < 30' 60 5 6 Beach Heliotrope Tournefortia argentea X X 15' - 35' 40 -1 7 Breadfruit Artocarpus altilis X 60' N/A -12 8 Brown Pine Podocarpus elatus X 100' - 125' N/A -2 25' o.c. 9 Carrotwood Cupaniopsis anacardioides X 25' - 40' 40 9 10 Coral Erythrina crista-galli X < 30' 40 6 11 Crape Myrtle Lagerstroemia indica X X < 30' 25 6 12 False Olive Cassine orientalis X < 30' 40 -1 13 False Sandalwood (Naio) Myoporum sandwicense X 30' - 60' N/A NL 60' o.c. 14 Fern Podocarpus Afrocarpus gracilior X 20' - 40' 40 0 15 Geiger (Haole Kou) Cordia sebestena X < 30' N/A -1 40' o.c. 16 Geometry Bucida buceras X 45' - 60' 40 -3 17 Giant Crape Myrtle Lagerstroemia speciosa X 30' - 80' 60 -4 18 Gold tree Roseodendron donnell-smithii X 60' - 90' 85 -4 Handroanthus ochracea subsp. 19 Golden Trumpet neochrysantha X 40' - 60' 60 -3 20 Hala Pandanus tectorius X X < 35' N/A NL 25' o.c. 21 Hau Hibiscus tiliaceus X X < 35' N/A NL 40' o.c. 22 Hau (Variegated) Hibiscus tiliaceus forma X < 30' 25 NL 23 Ho`awa Pittosporum hosmeri X < 30' 25 NL 24 Hong Kong Orchid Bauhinia xblakeana X 25' - 35' 40 -7 Recommended Industry Standard Plant Spacing Guidelines TREES: Canopy Spread Street Tree No.
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts of Alien Land Arthropods and Mollusks on Native Plants and Animals in Hawaii
    7. IMPACTS OF ALIEN LAND ARTHROPODS AND MOLLUSKS ON NATIVE PLANTS AND ANIMALS IN HAWAIfI Francis G. Howarth ABSTRACT Over 2,000 alien arthropod species and about 30 alien non-marine mollusks are established in the wild in Hawai'i, While the data are too meager to assess fully the impacts of any of these organisms on the na- tive biota, the documentation suggests several areas of critical concern. Alien species feed directly on na- tive plants or their products, thus competing with na- tive herbivores and affecting host plants. Alien pred- ators and parasites critically reduce the populations of many native species and seriously deplete the food resources of native predators. Some immigrant species spread diseases that infect elements of the native bio- ta. Others are toxic to native predators. There is also competition for other resources, such as nesting and resting sites. Even apparently innocuous intro- duced species may provide food for alien predators, thus keeping predator populations high with an atten- dant greater impact on native prey. Control measures targeted at alien pests may be hazardous to natives. Mitigative measures must be based on sound research and firmer understanding of the complex interactions and dynamics of functioning ecosystems. Strict quarantine procedures are cost effective in preventing or delaying the establishment of potential pests. Strict control or fumigation is needed for nonessential importations (such as cow chips, Christmas trees, and flowers in bulk). Improved review of introductions for biological control is required in order to prevent repeating past mistakes. Biocontrol introductions must be used only for bona fide pests and used in native ecosystems only in special circumstances.
    [Show full text]
  • Pu'u Wa'awa'a Biological Assessment
    PU‘U WA‘AWA‘A BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT PU‘U WA‘AWA‘A, NORTH KONA, HAWAII Prepared by: Jon G. Giffin Forestry & Wildlife Manager August 2003 STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF FORESTRY AND WILDLIFE TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE ................................................................................................................................. i TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................. ii GENERAL SETTING...................................................................................................................1 Introduction..........................................................................................................................1 Land Use Practices...............................................................................................................1 Geology..................................................................................................................................3 Lava Flows............................................................................................................................5 Lava Tubes ...........................................................................................................................5 Cinder Cones ........................................................................................................................7 Soils .......................................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Aspects of House Finch Breeding Biology in Hawaii
    ASPECTS OF HOUSE FINCH BREEDING BIOLOGY IN HAWAII CHARLES VAN RIPER III Bent (1968) summarized information avail- Puu Laau, is the last remaining major mamane-naio able on the breeding biology of the House forest in Hawaii. Finch ( Curpodacus mexicanus). Although The stippled areas of figure 1 represent a broad spectrum of the forest types on the island of Hawaii; this species has been studied quite extensively included are native, introduced, and mixed stands of in its North American home range, little atten- vegetation. Areas 2, 3, and 5 are dry forest regions tion has been paid to it in Hawaii. Grinnell with annual rainfall of 76 cm or less; Puu Laau (2) (1911) reported on different color patterns of has mean annual rainfall of 50 cm, Puu Waawaa (3) 64 cm, and Puu Lehua (5) has 76 cm. The Kohala the House Finch in Hawaii, and Richardson Mountain complex ( 1) has a mean annual rainfall of and Bowles (1964) mentioned that on 23 June 229 cm, Puu 00 (4) has 483 cm, and the Kulani- 1960 they found a nestling that had fallen from Mauna Loa complex (6) has 317 cm. its nest on Kauai. On Mauna Kea, Berger Birds were mist-netted, color-banded, and released (1972) found House Finch nests with eggs from 1971 through 1973. Nest and tree heights were taken with a clinometer when it was impractical to as early as 6 April (1968) and as late as 17 use a tape measure. Nests and eggs were measured July (1967). Eleven nests were built on hori- with calipers and weighed on a sensitive spring bal- zontal branches of mamane (Sophora chryso- ance.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloadable Data Collection
    Smetzer et al. Movement Ecology (2021) 9:36 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40462-021-00275-5 RESEARCH Open Access Individual and seasonal variation in the movement behavior of two tropical nectarivorous birds Jennifer R. Smetzer1* , Kristina L. Paxton1 and Eben H. Paxton2 Abstract Background: Movement of animals directly affects individual fitness, yet fine spatial and temporal resolution movement behavior has been studied in relatively few small species, particularly in the tropics. Nectarivorous Hawaiian honeycreepers are believed to be highly mobile throughout the year, but their fine-scale movement patterns remain unknown. The movement behavior of these crucial pollinators has important implications for forest ecology, and for mortality from avian malaria (Plasmodium relictum), an introduced disease that does not occur in high-elevation forests where Hawaiian honeycreepers primarily breed. Methods: We used an automated radio telemetry network to track the movement of two Hawaiian honeycreeper species, the ʻapapane (Himatione sanguinea) and ʻiʻiwi (Drepanis coccinea). We collected high temporal and spatial resolution data across the annual cycle. We identified movement strategies using a multivariate analysis of movement metrics and assessed seasonal changes in movement behavior. Results: Both species exhibited multiple movement strategies including sedentary, central place foraging, commuting, and nomadism , and these movement strategies occurred simultaneously across the population. We observed a high degree of intraspecific variability at the individual and population level. The timing of the movement strategies corresponded well with regional bloom patterns of ‘ōhi‘a(Metrosideros polymorpha) the primary nectar source for the focal species. Birds made long-distance flights, including multi-day forays outside the tracking array, but exhibited a high degree of fidelity to a core use area, even in the non-breeding period.
    [Show full text]
  • Keauhou Bird Conservation Center
    KEAUHOU BIRD CONSERVATION CENTER Discovery Forest Restoration Project PO Box 2037 Kamuela, HI 96743 Tel +1 808 776 9900 Fax +1 808 776 9901 Responsible Forester: Nicholas Koch [email protected] +1 808 319 2372 (direct) Table of Contents 1. CLIENT AND PROPERTY INFORMATION .................................................................... 4 1.1. Client ................................................................................................................................................ 4 1.2. Consultant ....................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Executive Summary .................................................................................................. 5 3. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 6 3.1. Site description ............................................................................................................................... 6 3.1.1. Parcel and location .................................................................................................................. 6 3.1.2. Site History ................................................................................................................................ 6 3.2. Plant ecosystems ............................................................................................................................ 6 3.2.1. Hydrology ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Twenty-Three of 69 Since Discovery of 17 SOME LIMITING
    17 SOME LIMITING FACTORS AND RESEARCH NEEDS OF ENDANGERED HAWAIIAN FOREST BIRDS Winston E. Banko U. S. Fish & Wildlife Service Hawaii Volcanoes National Park Hawaii 96718 It is well known that Hawaiian birds are particularly sus­ ceptible to depopulation and extinction. Twenty-three of 69 endemic species or races have disappeared since discovery of Hawai'i by Europeans 200 years ago. Except for Warner (1968) and Atkinson (1977), only super­ ficial inquiries have been made into historical aspects and underlying factors of the Hawaiian forest bird decline. After several years of field and laboratory investigation, Warner explained th~ rlisappearance of forest birds as being caused primarily by disease. Atkinson advanced a theory based on historical evidence that arboreal predation by rats was a leading factor. The object of my long-term historical investigation is to document and compare the salient facts on the geography and chro­ nology of Hawaiian bird loss, species by species; to chronicle what is known about all factors of depopulation~-predation, disease, habitat alteration, and food competition; and to draw such conclusions as seem warranted. At the First Conference in Natural Sciences two years ago, Banko and Banko (1976) reported on the potential significance of food depletion in the decline of Hawaiian forest birds. The role played by the Big-headed ant (Pheidole megacephala) in destroying much of the endemic insect fauna at elevations generally less than 3000 feet (914 m) before 1890 was sketched at that time. (The term "insect" will be used hereafter as including other arthropods as well). I now wish to elaborate on the possible impact of foreign parasitic flies and .wasps in depleting native insect foods impor­ tant to the small Hawaiian forest birds at higher elevation~.
    [Show full text]
  • Albizia Zygia Fabaceae
    Albizia zygia (DC.) Macbr. Fabaceae - Mimosoideae LOCAL NAMES Igbo (nyie avu); Swahili (nongo); Yoruba (ayin rela) BOTANIC DESCRIPTION Albizia zygia is a deciduous tree 9-30 m tall with a spreading crown and a graceful architectural form. Bole tall and clear, 240 cm in diameter. Bark grey and smooth. Young branchlets densely to very sparsely clothed with minute crisped puberulence, usually soon disappearing but sometimes persistent. Leaves pinnate, pinnae in 2-3 pairs and broadening towards the apex, obliquely rhombic or obovate with the distal pair largest, apex obtuse, 29- 72 by 16-43 mm, leaves are glabrous or nearly so. Flowers subsessile; pedicels and calyx puberulous, white or pink; staminal tube exserted for 10-18 mm beyond corolla. Fruit pod oblong, flat or somewhat transversely plicate, reddish-brown in colour, 10-18 cm by 2-4 cm glabrous or nearly so. The seeds of A. zygia are smaller (7.5-10 mm long and 6.5 to 8.5 mm wide) and flatter than either of the other Albizia, but have the characteristic round shape, with a slightly swollen center. The genus was named after Filippo del Albizzi, a Florentine nobleman who in 1749 introduced A. julibrissin into cultivation. BIOLOGY A hermaphroditic species flowering in January, February, March, August, and September. Fruits ripen in January, February, March, April, November, and December. This tree hybridizes with A. gummifera. Agroforestry Database 4.0 (Orwa et al.2009) Page 1 of 5 Albizia zygia (DC.) Macbr. Fabaceae - Mimosoideae ECOLOGY A light demanding pioneer species, it is rarely found in closed canopy forests dominated by Chlorophora regia and Ficus macrosperma.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biology, Host Range, Parasites, and Hyperparasites of Koa Seed Insects in Hawaii: a Review
    Vol. 24, Nos. 2 & 3, October 15,1983 317 The Biology, Host Range, Parasites, and Hyperparasites of Koa Seed Insects in Hawaii: a Review JOHN D. STEIN1 ABSTRACT The biology and host range of koa seed insects, their parasites, and hyperparasites in Hawaii are reviewed. The information reported may be applicable to other native or introduced legumes because of the wide hosthnst rangeranopt ofrtf a fewfi»w ofnf thetht* insects.inc^Wc Koa, Acacia koa Gray, is considered the most valuable native timber species in Hawaii. Pure stands of koa cover approximately 7.5 thousand hectares (18.6 thousand acres) with an additional 172.4 thousand hectares (426 thousand acres) of koa-ohia mixture in the native forest ecosystems within the State. Selective logging has reduced the quality of koa to less desirable commercial grade trees. Since 1978, the Hawaii State Department of Land and Natural Resources has been replanting sites where koa once grew. The emphasis on reforestation of this high value hardwood has stimulated research by the Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, to select and propagate genetically superior trees. Progeny from these trees will then be used to establish viable seed orchards. Insects present a potentially serious threat to koa seed production. In a recent survey, I found that up to 86% of the seed was destroyed by insects, and three insects were responsible for 93% of the damage (Stein 1983). This review discusses the biology and host range of the koa seed insects, and lists their parasites. Previously published biological data for these insects were augmented with information from the Bernice P.
    [Show full text]
  • Acacia Koa Fabaceae
    Acacia koa Gray Fabaceae - Mimosoideae koa LOCAL NAMES English (koa acacia,koa,Hawaiian mahogany); Hawaian (koa); Trade name (koa) BOTANIC DESCRIPTION Acacia koa is a large, evergreen tree to 25 m tall, stem diameter to 150 cm at breast height. Trees occurring in dense, wet native forest stands typically retain a straight, narrow form. In the open, trees develop more spreading, branching crowns and shorter, broader trunks. A. koa has one main tap root and an otherwise shallow, spreading root system. Bark gray, Exclosure at Pohakuokala Gulch, Maui, rough, scaly and thick. Hawaii (Forest and Kim Starr) A. koa belongs to the thorn-less, phyllodinous group of the Acacia subgenus Heterophyllum. Young seedlings have bipinnate compound true leaves with 12-15 pairs of leaflets. Where forest light is sufficient, seedlings stop producing true leaves while they are less than 2 m tall. True leaves are retained longer by trees growing in dense shade. Phyllodes are sickle-shaped and often more than 2.5 cm wide in the middle and blunt pointed on each end. Inflorescence is a pale yellow ball, 8.5 mm in diameter, 1-3 on a common stalk. Each inflorescence is composed of many bisexual flowers. Each Habit at Makawao forest reserve, Maui, flower has an indefinite number of stamens and a single elongated style. Hawaii (Forest and Kim Starr) Pods are slow to dehisce, 15 cm long and 2.5-4 cm wide. They contain 6- 12 seeds that vary from dark brown to black. The generic name ‘acacia’ comes from the Greek word ‘akis’, meaning point or barb.
    [Show full text]
  • Albizia Julibrissin Durazz
    Albizia julibrissin Durazz. Fabaceae - Mimosoideae LOCAL NAMES Chinese (ho hun,ho huan); Dutch (acacia van Constantinopel); English (pink siris,Persian acacia,pink silk tree,mimosa,silk mimosa tree,silk tree,silky acacia,pink mimosa); French (arbre à soie,acacie de Constantinople); German (persische Seidenakazie,Julibrissin- Albizzie); Hindi (karmaru,brind,lal,tandai,shishi,sirin,siris,kurmru); Italian (acacia di Constantinopoli,gaggia di Constaninopoli,gaggia arborea,albero de la seta); Japanese (nemu-no-ki); Nepali (kato siris) BOTANIC DESCRIPTION Bark (James H. Miller, USDA Forest Albizia julibrissin is a small to medium-sized tree 6-9 m tall with a Service, www.forestryimages.org) spreading crown. The bark is light brown, nearly smooth, and generally thin with lens shaped areas along the stem. Leaves large, up to 50 cm long, bipinnately compound with 10-35 pairs of leaflets, many oblong leaflets, each only 6-12 mm long by about 7.5-10 cm wide, and alternate along the stems. Leaves fold up under the night sky Flowers showy, fragrant pink, about 3.75 cm long, that resembling pompoms and are arranged in panicles at the ends of branches. Fruits are flat, straw-colored pods about 15 cm long containing light brown Quick growing, flat-topped crown. Branches oval-shaped seeds about 1.25 cm in length. in lateral tiers. Long feathery fern-like leaves up to 45cm long - provide light shade. Spectacular in flower - from early summer to The generic name commemorates the Florentine nobleman Filippo degli autumn. Ornamental used as avenue tree Albizzi, who introduced the plant into cultivation in the middle of the 18th and lawn shade.
    [Show full text]