DOCSLIB.ORG

On Near-Earth Asteroid Study at Department of Astronomy, Bandung Institute of Technology

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ISBN : 9-793-688-02-5 SEMINAR MIPA IV, ITB 6-7 OKTOBER 2004 On Near-Earth Asteroid Study at Department of Astronomy, Bandung Institute of Technology S.Siregar Department of Astronomy and Bosscha Observatory Bandung Institute of Technology, Bandung Indonesia e-mail :[email protected] Abstract Since1984 asteroid study is conducted at Department of Astronomy, Bandung Institute of Technology. At present there are two main streams in our research, dynamical and physical study. Astronomers determine the orbital elements of more than 12000 asteroids, and the number is increasing. In the distribution of orbital elements of asteroids, there are several features such as Kirkwood gap, groups, and families. To know the dynamical evolution of asteroids, it is very important to study these features. Recently some small bodies of our solar system have been approached to the Earth, one of them was Toutatis. These objects are interested to study. Based on 2384 asteroids taken from NASA.File the phenomenon of orbital elements a, e, i, :, Z and Tisserand invariant, T of Near-Earth asteroids are briefly described Key word: Asteroids-Orbital Element-Three Body Problem 1. Introduction objects are of comparable size, they will destroy each others, leaving hundreds or thousands of The aim of this study is continuation of fragments. This collision destruction has previous long-term dynamical study of Amor- occurred so often during the lifetime of the solar Apollo-Aten (collectively referred as AAA system, that practically all the asteroids we now asteroids). Two main theories introduced to see are fragments of the original parent bodies. explain the origin of the asteroids in the main- Some may be found in unstable zone, like those belts. The oldest assumes the existence of a of the Kirkwood gaps, they became the source of parent planet perturbing between Mars and Apollo-Amor-Aten (AAA) asteroids. Study on Jupiter, which broken. Some of them ejected to the ecliptical motion and perihelion distribution libration points L4 and L5, called Trojan resulted that asteroids occupy the ecliptic plane, asteroids and others become the Earth-Crossing implying that the selection of an exponential objects, well known as NEA (Near-Earth distribution function is reasonable. The Asteroid) or NEC (Near-Earth Comet), (Siregar maximum distance, z0 to the ecliptic plane of and Nakamura,1989). Nowadays, one theory Aten, Apollo and Amor represents an z0 largely accepted is that, asteroid are small exponential distribution of, f (z0) = ab . Here z0 condensations from the primitive solar nebula # a Sin i, and ~b~1 (Siregar,1991a) . It is that were unable to form into a single body, estimated that there are about 1000 Apollos, 100 undoubtedly because of the gravitational Atens and 1000-2000 Amors. Their mean life instability caused by the presence of Jupiter. times are of the order of 107 - 108 years before These objects moving between Mars and they either are ejected from the Solar System, or Jupiter and collisions are happened frequently. collide with a planet (Siregar, 1991b). A typical velocity is about 5 kilometers per Simulation done by Yamada(1990) shows the second, when a small asteroid hits a larger one, Earth or Venus gravitational attraction had it will make a crater in the larger body. If two reduced comet’s aphelion distances when the 224 ISBN : 9-793-688-02-5 SEMINAR MIPA IV, ITB 6-7 OKTOBER 2004 comets had passed close to the Earth or Venus polynomial is algebra theorem of Descartes, and it has been found that there exist an analogy detail of it is application see Siregar (1998). At between the distribution of Jacobi constants of the same time many of the cometary candidates Amor-Apollo objects and those hypothetical have physical properties that are inconsistent comets that enter shallowly inside or graze the with our current understanding of cometary orbit of the Earth or Venus(Siregar,1993a). In nuclei such as albedos and (or) unusual spectra. additions it is interesting that so many of the (Siregar, 1995a, 1995b). Otherwise recently AAA asteroids appear unusual, as compared study by using least square method applied for with main-belts objects . The precise physical 2384 Near-Earth asteroids suggest that mechanism that might explain the differences distribution function of semi major axis of NEA remains a mystery. The present situation estimate are follow F(x) = D xE eJx. For degrees of that some 60% of the Earth-crossing (Apollo- freedom (d.o.f) = 31, we found that correlation type) objects supplied from some other coefficient, r = 0.95 with D = 7.84, E = 7.69 and reservoirs. At present the short period comets are J = -5.16. Mean while there are the evidence for the only identified reservoir that can fill that gap a Near-Earth-Asteroid belt, composed of objects (Richard et al, 1992) with semi major axis, a # 1.4 AU. The maximum of semi major axis is 17.96AU (1999 XS35) and Study based on the view of Tisserand’s the minimum of semi major axis a = 0.64 AU 2 1/2 invariant, T = 1/a + 2[a (1-e )] Cos i , where belong to 1999 KW4 (Siregar, 2003) semi major axis, a, in unity of semi major axis of Jupiter, show that, T, of AAA objects spread in the range from 2 to 7.6 with strong concentration at T t 3, meanwhile comets have, 2. Regression Curve of the Orbital Elements T< 3 .There are 17 asteroids, consist of 7 Apollos and 10 Amors have a small value of Empirical models of semi major axis, a, Tisserand invariant. It is thus possible that eccentricity, e and inclination, i asteroid could be of commentary origin. In this described such as, density function sense, they ought to be observed with greater attention. The other hand, there are 77 comets F(x) = DxEeJx (1) has a big value of Tisserand invariant, they often pass near Jupiter and their orbits forces, the where comet’s escaping gases give slight push to the comets, which slowly changes their orbit. These x = midpoint interval comets have a short period, P less than 8.6 F = frequency years. It is also known that comet gradually decay. These appear to be real transitional case The expression (1) analog to the linear equation; with regard to the comet-asteroid classifications objects, which are asteroidal in physical Z = a0 +a1X +a2Y (2) appearance, but they are cometary in dynamical behavior. These objects can be either extinct In this case, cometary nuclei or asteroid dynamically transferred from their usual stable orbit. By using Z = Log F(x), X = Ln(x) and Y = x 3rd order of Gauss equation some aspects to a0 = Log D , a1 = E and a2 = J determine the orbit especially, stability and condition for good computation, has been Consider a sample (X1,Y1,Z1) , . ., (Xn,Yn,Zn) discussed by Siregar (2001). In certain case some of size n, and assume, asteroids dynamically present as comets for 2 S = ¦ ( Z -( a + a X + a Y )) examples near-earth asteroids, 1997 SE5, 1982 i 0 1 i 2 i YA, 2002 RN38 and 2002 VY94. Partial part of comet trajectory can be determined by using In the method of least square a0, a1, and a2 are Baker equation, therefore it is important to chosen such that S is minimum, the necessary estimate the profile of orbit. Already well known condition for S to be minimum is; that classical method to locate the real root of 225 ISBN : 9-793-688-02-5 SEMINAR MIPA IV, ITB 6-7 OKTOBER 2004 S/a0 = 0, S/a1 = 0 and S/a2 = 0 (3) Histogram Argumen Perihelium This yields the normal equation, which are given by; 140 120 100 80 ¦Z = na0 + a1¦X + a2¦Y N 60 2 ¦XZ = a0¦X + a1¦X + a2¦XY (4) 40 2 ¦YZ = a0¦Y + a1¦XY + a2¦Y 20 0 10 60 110 160 210 260 310 The regression coefficient of (Z on X and Y), a0, w[deg] a1, and a2 can be calculated by Cramer method. According to Spiegel(1982) if we define Fig 1.Histogram of Perihelion Argument of Zi = a0 + a1Xi + a2Yi (5) NEA. Total sample is 2383 asteroids NEA distribute evenly on ecliptic plane, Ȧ maximum = 3590.926 (2001 BA40) unexplained variation Ȧ minimum =00.101 (1999 BL33) 2 ıu = ¦ ( Zi- Zi) (6) Histogram Eksentrisitas NEAO total variation 350 2 ıT = ¦ ( Zi-Zr) (7) 300 250 Zr – average of Zi 200 N 150 explained variation 100 50 ıe = ıT - ıu (8) 0 0.05 0.25 0.45 0.65 0.85 then correlation coefficient is; e 1/2 r = (ıe / ıT) (9) Fig. 2. Histogram of Eccentricity of NEA. Total sample is 2383 asteroids eccentricity maximum, e max= 0.956 (2002 PD43) Eccentricity Where the value of correlation coefficient is, r minimum , e min = 0.013 (2002 AA29). d1 Distribution function follows, F(X)= DXEeJX with, D = 47.74, E = 2.73 and J = -9.52, correlation coefficient, r = 0.96, degree of 3. Results of Orbital Studies freedom d.o.f = 19 Some figures of our recent study such as histogram of orbital elements, and plot of Tisserand invariant are presented in this section. The surface of zero velocity relative of asteroid, calculated according to the three-body problem. For more detail information see Danby (1989) 226 ISBN : 9-793-688-02-5 SEMINAR MIPA IV, ITB 6-7 OKTOBER 2004 Histogram Setengah sumbu Histogram Ascending Node panjang NEAO 120 200 100 150 80 N 60 N 100 40 50 20 0 0 0.6 1.1 1.6 2.1 2.6 3.1 3.6 4.1 10 90 170 250 330 a[AU] W[Deg] Fig.3 Histogram of Semi Major Axis of Fig.
Recommended publications
  • Asteroid Retrieval Feasibility Study

    Asteroid Retrieval Feasibility Study

    Publications 4-2-2012 Asteroid Retrieval Feasibility Study John Brophy California Institute of Technology Fred Culick California Institute of Technology Louis Friedman The Planetary Society Pedro Llanos Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach, [email protected] et al. Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/publication Part of the Astrodynamics Commons, Space Vehicles Commons, and the The Sun and the Solar System Commons Scholarly Commons Citation Brophy, J., Culick, F., Friedman, L., Llanos, P., & al., e. (2012). Asteroid Retrieval Feasibility Study. , (). Retrieved from https://commons.erau.edu/publication/893 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Asteroid Retrieval Feasibility Study 2 April 2012 Prepared for the: Keck Institute for Space Studies California Institute of Technology Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, California 1 2 Authors and Study Participants NAME Organization E-Mail Signature John Brophy Co-Leader / NASA JPL / Caltech [email protected] Fred Culick Co-Leader / Caltech [email protected] Co -Leader / The Planetary Louis Friedman [email protected] Society Carlton Allen NASA JSC [email protected] David Baughman Naval Postgraduate School [email protected] NASA ARC/Carnegie Mellon Julie Bellerose [email protected] University Bruce Betts The Planetary Society
  • An Ongoing Effort to Identify Near-Earth Asteroid Destination

    An Ongoing Effort to Identify Near-Earth Asteroid Destination

    The Near-Earth Object Human Space Flight Accessible Targets Study: An Ongoing Effort to Identify Near-Earth Asteroid Destinations for Human Explorers Presented to the 2013 IAA Planetary Defense Conference Brent W. Barbee∗, Paul A. Abelly, Daniel R. Adamoz, Cassandra M. Alberding∗, Daniel D. Mazanekx, Lindley N. Johnsonk, Donald K. Yeomans#, Paul W. Chodas#, Alan B. Chamberlin#, Victoria P. Friedensenk NASA/GSFC∗ / NASA/JSCy / Aerospace Consultantz NASA/LaRCx / NASA/HQk / NASA/JPL# April 16th, 2013 Introduction I Near-Earth Objects (NEOs) are asteroids and comets with perihelion distance < 1.3 AU I Small, usually rocky bodies (occasionally metallic) I Sizes range from a few meters to ≈ 35 kilometers I Near-Earth Asteroids (NEAs) are currently candidate destinations for human space flight missions in the mid-2020s th I As of April 4 , 2013, a total of 9736 NEAs have been discovered, and more are being discovered on a continual basis 2 Motivations for NEA Exploration I Solar system science I NEAs are largely unchanged in composition since the early days of the solar system I Asteroids and comets may have delivered water and even the seeds of life to the young Earth I Planetary defense I NEA characterization I NEA proximity operations I In-Situ Resource Utilization I Could manufacture radiation shielding, propellant, and more I Human Exploration I The most ambitious journey of human discovery since Apollo I NEAs as stepping stones to Mars 3 NHATS Background I NASA's Near-Earth Object Human Space Flight Accessible Targets Study (NHATS) (pron.: /næts/) began in September of 2010 under the auspices of the NASA Headquarters Planetary Science Mission Directorate in cooperation with the Advanced Exploration Systems Division of the Human Exploration and Operations Mission Directorate.
  • Discovery of Earth's Quasi-Satellite

    Discovery of Earth's Quasi-Satellite

    Meteoritics & Planetary Science 39, Nr 8, 1251–1255 (2004) Abstract available online at http://meteoritics.org Discovery of Earth’s quasi-satellite Martin CONNORS,1* Christian VEILLET,2 Ramon BRASSER,3 Paul WIEGERT,4 Paul CHODAS,5 Seppo MIKKOLA,6 and Kimmo INNANEN3 1Athabasca University, Athabasca AB, Canada T9S 3A3 2Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope, P. O. Box 1597, Kamuela, Hawaii 96743, USA 3Department of Physics and Astronomy, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3 Canada 4Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada 5Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91109, USA 6Turku University Observatory, Tuorla, FIN-21500 Piikkiö, Finland *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] (Received 18 February 2004; revision accepted 12 July 2004) Abstract–The newly discovered asteroid 2003 YN107 is currently a quasi-satellite of the Earth, making a satellite-like orbit of high inclination with apparent period of one year. The term quasi- satellite is used since these large orbits are not completely closed, but rather perturbed portions of the asteroid’s orbit around the Sun. Due to its extremely Earth-like orbit, this asteroid is influenced by Earth’s gravity to remain within 0.1 AU of the Earth for approximately 10 years (1997 to 2006). Prior to this, it had been on a horseshoe orbit closely following Earth’s orbit for several hundred years. It will re-enter such an orbit, and make one final libration of 123 years, after which it will have a close interaction with the Earth and transition to a circulating orbit.
  • Earth's Recurrent Quasi-Satellite?

    Earth's Recurrent Quasi-Satellite?

    2002 AA: Earth’s recurrent quasi-satellite ? Pawel Wajer To cite this version: Pawel Wajer. 2002 AA: Earth’s recurrent quasi-satellite ?. Icarus, Elsevier, 2009, 200 (1), pp.147. 10.1016/j.icarus.2008.10.018. hal-00510967 HAL Id: hal-00510967 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00510967 Submitted on 23 Aug 2010 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Accepted Manuscript 2002 AA29: Earth’s recurrent quasi-satellite ? Paweł Wajer PII: S0019-1035(08)00381-3 DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2008.10.018 Reference: YICAR 8801 To appear in: Icarus Received date: 11 April 2008 Revised date: 20 October 2008 Accepted date: 23 October 2008 Please cite this article as: P. Wajer, 2002 AA29: Earth’s recurrent quasi-satellite ?, Icarus (2008), doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2008.10.018 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
  • 1. Some of the Definitions of the Different Types of Objects in the Solar

    1. Some of the Definitions of the Different Types of Objects in the Solar

    1. Some of the definitions of the different types of objects in has the greatest orbital inclination (orbit at the the solar system overlap. Which one of the greatest angle to that of Earth)? following pairs does not overlap? That is, if an A) Mercury object can be described by one of the labels, it B) Mars cannot be described by the other. C) Jupiter A) dwarf planet and asteroid D) Pluto B) dwarf planet and Kuiper belt object C) satellite and Kuiper belt object D) meteoroid and planet 10. Of the following objects in the solar system, which one has the greatest orbital eccentricity and therefore the most elliptical orbit? 2. Which one of the following is a small solar system body? A) Mercury A) Rhea, a moon of Saturn B) Mars B) Pluto C) Earth C) Ceres (an asteroid) D) Pluto D) Mathilde (an asteroid) 11. What is the largest moon of the dwarf planet Pluto 3. Which of the following objects was discovered in the called? twentieth century? A) Chiron A) Pluto B) Callisto B) Uranus C) Charon C) Neptune D) Triton D) Ceres 12. If you were standing on Pluto, how often would you see 4. Pluto was discovered in the satellite Charon rise above the horizon each A) 1930. day? B) 1846. A) once each 6-hour day as Pluto rotates on its axis C) 1609. B) twice each 6-hour day because Charon is in a retrograde D) 1781. orbit C) once every 2 days because Charon orbits in the same direction Pluto rotates but more slowly 5.
  • March 21–25, 2016

    March 21–25, 2016

    FORTY-SEVENTH LUNAR AND PLANETARY SCIENCE CONFERENCE PROGRAM OF TECHNICAL SESSIONS MARCH 21–25, 2016 The Woodlands Waterway Marriott Hotel and Convention Center The Woodlands, Texas INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT Universities Space Research Association Lunar and Planetary Institute National Aeronautics and Space Administration CONFERENCE CO-CHAIRS Stephen Mackwell, Lunar and Planetary Institute Eileen Stansbery, NASA Johnson Space Center PROGRAM COMMITTEE CHAIRS David Draper, NASA Johnson Space Center Walter Kiefer, Lunar and Planetary Institute PROGRAM COMMITTEE P. Doug Archer, NASA Johnson Space Center Nicolas LeCorvec, Lunar and Planetary Institute Katherine Bermingham, University of Maryland Yo Matsubara, Smithsonian Institute Janice Bishop, SETI and NASA Ames Research Center Francis McCubbin, NASA Johnson Space Center Jeremy Boyce, University of California, Los Angeles Andrew Needham, Carnegie Institution of Washington Lisa Danielson, NASA Johnson Space Center Lan-Anh Nguyen, NASA Johnson Space Center Deepak Dhingra, University of Idaho Paul Niles, NASA Johnson Space Center Stephen Elardo, Carnegie Institution of Washington Dorothy Oehler, NASA Johnson Space Center Marc Fries, NASA Johnson Space Center D. Alex Patthoff, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Cyrena Goodrich, Lunar and Planetary Institute Elizabeth Rampe, Aerodyne Industries, Jacobs JETS at John Gruener, NASA Johnson Space Center NASA Johnson Space Center Justin Hagerty, U.S. Geological Survey Carol Raymond, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Lindsay Hays, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Paul Schenk,
  • 1 ABSTRACT Aside from the Exploration of Mars, the Objects That

    1 ABSTRACT Aside from the Exploration of Mars, the Objects That

    IAC-07-B3.5.06 INTO THE BEYOND: A CREWED MISSION TO A NEAR-EARTH OBJECT David J. Korsmeyer, NASA Ames Research Center, Intelligent Systems Division, Moffett Field, CA, USA, [email protected] Rob R. Landis, NASA Johnson Space Center, Mission Operations Directorate, Houston, TX, USA [email protected] Paul A. Abell, NASA Johnson Space Center, Astromaterials Research & Exploration Science, Houston, TX, USA [email protected] ABSTRACT utility and opportunities for the developing Aside from the exploration of Mars, the Constellation infrastructure, particularly, the objects that most capture our interest for a Ares Launch vehicles and the Orion crewed new human visit are the Near-Earth Objects spacecraft, to be used for missions that were (NEOs). These objects are ideal candidates not directly in the design specifications (aka for deep space operations and explorations as non-lunar missions). The Ares and Orion we extend the human presence out into the systems are designed to launch 4-6 crew to solar system. The notion of a crewed mission the International Space Station (ISS), and to to a NEO was first discussed in the Apollo eventually take 4 crew back to lunar orbit era. The most recent assessment has been where a lunar lander would take the crew to undertaken by the Advanced Projects Office the surface. within NASA’s Constellation Program. This particular study examined the feasibility of The NASA Constellation Program wanted to sending NASA’s new Orion spacecraft (also understand what are some other feasible, referred to as the Crew Exploration Vehicle, high-value uses of the Orion spacecraft and or CEV) to a NEO.
  • Asteroid Retrieval Mission Concept – Trailblazing Our Future in Space and Helping to Protect Us from Earth Impactors

    Asteroid Retrieval Mission Concept – Trailblazing Our Future in Space and Helping to Protect Us from Earth Impactors

    Asteroid Retrieval Mission Concept – Trailblazing Our Future in Space and Helping to Protect Us from Earth Impactors Presented by Dan Mazanek1 Co-authors: John Brophy2 and Gabe Merrill1 1NASA Langley Research Center; 2Jet Propulsion Laboratory April 16, 2013 2013 Planetary Defense Conference Flagstaff, USA Paper No: IAA-PDC13-04-14 1 Background The idea of utilizing asteroidal resources is not new • 1903 – Konstantin Tsiolkovskii included the concept of using asteroids for resources in his most famous publication, The Exploration of Cosmic Space by Means of Reaction Motors • 1977 – NASA’s Dr. Brian O’Leary proposed using mass drivers to move Earth- approaching Apollo and Amor asteroids to Earth’s vicinity • 1997 – Dr. John S. Lewis detailed how we can extract the vast resources available from our solar system in the influential book Mining the Sky: Untold Riches from the Asteroids, Comets, and Planets September 2011 and February 2012 – Asteroid Retrieval Mission (ARM) Study at Caltech’s Keck Institute for Space Studies (KISS) • Examined the feasibility of returning a small (~7 m diameter) near-Earth asteroid (NEA), or part of a large NEA, to cislunar space • Utilize robotic 50 kW-class solar electric propulsion (SEP) vehicle and currently available technologies (40 kW available to the electric propulsion system) • John Brophy (Co-Leader along with Louis Friedman and Fred Culick) and Dan Mazanek were KISS ARM study members 2 Recent Events Recent events have elevated the public’s awareness of the potential of space resources and have
  • 1950 Da, 205, 269 1979 Va, 230 1991 Ry16, 183 1992 Kd, 61 1992

    1950 Da, 205, 269 1979 Va, 230 1991 Ry16, 183 1992 Kd, 61 1992

    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-09684-4 — Asteroids Thomas H. Burbine Index More Information 356 Index 1950 DA, 205, 269 single scattering, 142, 143, 144, 145 1979 VA, 230 visual Bond, 7 1991 RY16, 183 visual geometric, 7, 27, 28, 163, 185, 189, 190, 1992 KD, 61 191, 192, 192, 253 1992 QB1, 233, 234 Alexandra, 59 1993 FW, 234 altitude, 49 1994 JR1, 239, 275 Alvarez, Luis, 258 1999 JU3, 61 Alvarez, Walter, 258 1999 RL95, 183 amino acid, 81 1999 RQ36, 61 ammonia, 223, 301 2000 DP107, 274, 304 amoeboid olivine aggregate, 83 2000 GD65, 205 Amor, 251 2001 QR322, 232 Amor group, 251 2003 EH1, 107 Anacostia, 179 2007 PA8, 207 Anand, Viswanathan, 62 2008 TC3, 264, 265 Angelina, 175 2010 JL88, 205 angrite, 87, 101, 110, 126, 168 2010 TK7, 231 Annefrank, 274, 275, 289 2011 QF99, 232 Antarctic Search for Meteorites (ANSMET), 71 2012 DA14, 108 Antarctica, 69–71 2012 VP113, 233, 244 aphelion, 30, 251 2013 TX68, 64 APL, 275, 292 2014 AA, 264, 265 Apohele group, 251 2014 RC, 205 Apollo, 179, 180, 251 Apollo group, 230, 251 absorption band, 135–6, 137–40, 145–50, Apollo mission, 129, 262, 299 163, 184 Apophis, 20, 269, 270 acapulcoite/ lodranite, 87, 90, 103, 110, 168, 285 Aquitania, 179 Achilles, 232 Arecibo Observatory, 206 achondrite, 84, 86, 116, 187 Aristarchus, 29 primitive, 84, 86, 103–4, 287 Asporina, 177 Adamcarolla, 62 asteroid chronology function, 262 Adeona family, 198 Asteroid Zoo, 54 Aeternitas, 177 Astraea, 53 Agnia family, 170, 198 Astronautica, 61 AKARI satellite, 192 Aten, 251 alabandite, 76, 101 Aten group, 251 Alauda family, 198 Atira, 251 albedo, 7, 21, 27, 185–6 Atira group, 251 Bond, 7, 8, 9, 28, 189 atmosphere, 1, 3, 8, 43, 66, 68, 265 geometric, 7 A- type, 163, 165, 167, 169, 170, 177–8, 192 356 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-09684-4 — Asteroids Thomas H.
  • ~XECKDING PAGE BLANK WT FIL,,Q

    ~XECKDING PAGE BLANK WT FIL,,Q

    1,. ,-- ,-- ~XECKDING PAGE BLANK WT FIL,,q DYNAMICAL EVIDENCE REGARDING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ASTEROIDS AND METEORITES GEORGE W. WETHERILL Department of Temcltricrl kgnetism ~amregie~mtittition of Washington Washington, D. C. 20025 Meteorites are fragments of small solar system bodies (comets, asteroids and Apollo objects). Therefore they may be expected to provide valuable information regarding these bodies. How- ever, the identification of particular classes of meteorites with particular small bodies or classes of small bodies is at present uncertain. It is very unlikely that any significant quantity of meteoritic material is obtained from typical ac- tive comets. Relatively we1 1-studied dynamical mechanisms exist for transferring material into the vicinity of the Earth from the inner edge of the asteroid belt on an 210~-~year time scale. It seems likely that most iron meteorites are obtained in this way, and a significant yield of complementary differec- tiated meteoritic silicate material may be expected to accom- pany these differentiated iron meteorites. Insofar as data exist, photometric measurements support an association between Apollo objects and chondri tic meteorites. Because Apol lo ob- jects are in orbits which come close to the Earth, and also must be fragmented as they traverse the asteroid belt near aphel ion, there also must be a component of the meteorite flux derived from Apollo objects. Dynamical arguments favor the hypothesis that most Apollo objects are devolatilized comet resiaues. However, plausible dynamical , petrographic, and cosmogonical reasons are known which argue against the simple conclusion of this syllogism, uiz., that chondri tes are of cometary origin. Suggestions are given for future theoretical , observational, experimental investigations directed toward improving our understanding of this puzzling situation.
  • Report to the NSF AST Senior Review (July 2005)

    Report to the NSF AST Senior Review (July 2005)

    NATIONAL ASTRONOMY & IONOSPHERE CENTER Operated by Cornell University under cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation NAIC Science in the Twenty-First Century: Report to the NSF Senior Review El quien no ha visto el Observatorio de Arecibo no ha visto una maravilla. July 2005 NAIC Science in the Twenty-First Century: Report to the NSF Senior Review 1. Executive Summary 1 2. The Unique Role of NAIC in U.S. Astronomy 2 2.1 The “Millennium Questions” in Astrophysics 2 2.2 ALFA Surveys 3 2.3 Pulsar Timing 10 2.4 the High Sensitivity Array 11 2.5 S-Band Planetary Radar 14 2.6 SETI 18 3. NAIC Science in the Twenty-First Century: A New Model for a National Observatory 18 3.1 Partnerships in Detector and Digital Signal Processing Technology 20 3.2 Partnerships in Computation and Information Sharing Technology 21 3.3 ALFA Legacy Survey Consortia Organization 24 3.4 Management of the U.S. Square Kilometer Array Partnership for the Technology Development Project 25 4. NAIC General Facility Description 25 4.1 Overview of the Facility 25 4.2 NAIC Managing Institution and Organization 26 4.3 NAIC Funding Sources 26 4.4 Specifics of the Telescope and Instrumentation 26 4.5 New Capabilities Planned in the Next 5-10 Years 26 4.6 Science Overview 27 4.6.1 Current Forefront Scientific Programs 27 4.6.2 Major NAIC Astronomy Program Scientific Discoveries Made at the Arecibo Observatory 28 4.6.3 NAIC Astronomy Program Science Highlights of the Last Five Years 29 4.6.4 Focus on Future Astronomy Program Science Questions 29 5.
  • The Role of Resonances in Astrodynamical Systems

    The Role of Resonances in Astrodynamical Systems

    The Role of Resonances in Astrodynamical Systems Rudolf Dvorak Institut for Astronomy University Vienna e-mail: [email protected] Abstract This review intends to highlight the importance of resonances of the orbits of planets and asteroids in our Solar System. Besides the well known 5:2 mean motion resonance between Jupiter and Saturn, we discuss how secular resonances act, where the motions of the longitudes of the perihelia and/or the longitudes of the nodes are involved. Resonances are especially important for the motions of small bodies in the Solar System from the Earth crossing Near Earth Asteroids to the far moving asteroids and comets in the Kuiper belt outside Pluto's orbit. Briefly we also discuss retrograde orbits in resonances which turn out to be much more stable then prograde ones. The presence and importance of resonances in the dynamics of extrasolar planetary systems is a new exciting field for celestial mechanics. 1 Introduction In physics it is well known, that resonances play a fundamental role in any dynamical system. But, how important are resonances in astrodynamical systems? In this review we will deal first of all with our very own Solar System, where planets are trapped in so-called mean motion resonances causing chaos among asteroids and where celestial bodies generally suffer from strong perturbations due to secular resonances. With the discovery of extrasolar systems hosting planets which seem to be on highly eccentric orbits, that still are stable, another exiting chapter has been added to this topic. Such a behavior is understandable only, if these planets are locked in certain resonances.