DOCSLIB.ORG

Local Resident Submissions to the Borough of Poole Electoral Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Local Resident Submissions to the Borough of Poole Electoral Review Local resident submissions to the Borough of Poole electoral review This PDF document contains 44 submissions surnames A-E. Some versions of Adobe allow the viewer to move quickly between bookmarks. Click on the submission you would like to view. If you are not taken to that page, please scroll through the document. 2 My first Reason is that it is the Electorate that should be the driving issue, and the number of Councillors should be calculated from that, and not the other way round. To do it the other way is definitely the Tail wagging the Dog. My second reason is that the group of Roads which may be transferred out of Broadstone to Creekmoor, are very much a central part of Broadstone, and the residents feel that way. They are involved with Broadstone schooling, and Broadstone Community activities such as Doctors. Library, Churches, and membership of the many voluntary organisations for both younge peopl and adults, which are Broadstone based. We are not talking about detaching some remote part of Broadstone very much at the periphery of activity here. These residents are definitely part of Broadstone and all that this means. I understand this has been demonstrated by opinion given by the residents themselves to our local Councillors. I am a member of our Local Neighbourhood Watch Committee, and I have been a Broadstone resident since 1974, and have always been active to some extent in the community. I really do believe that moving residents currently in Broadstone to Creekmoor will be a bad thing for all involved. Please may I ask for you to give an acknowledgment of this email as I understand there is a deadline of 7th January for sending in representations. With Kind Regards. 2 Fuller, Heather From: Evison, Alison Sent: 07 January 2014 11:16 To: Kingsley, Paul Cc: Fuller, Heather Subject: FW: Poole Ward Boundary Changes - Broadstone/Creekmoor Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged From: Sent: 01 January 2014 18:24 To: Evison, Alison Cc: Kingsley, Paul Subject: Poole Ward Boundary Changes - Broadstone/Creekmoor We have read numerous comments from Poole residents on the ward boundary changes affecting the Broadstone / Creekmoor border. Almost all of these comments were written by residents who are not directly affected, as they do not live at the boundary. As residents who are directly affected, and likely to moved into the Creekmoor Ward, (and we know we speak for many of the affected residents), we would like to make the following points: Our identity has always been part of Broadstone and not Creekmoor. Our children go to Broadstone schools, attend the Broadstone brownies and Broadstone churches. We use the Broadstone leisure centre. We use the Broadstone surgery, shops, restaurants, takeaways and bars. We use the Broadstone library, and are members of the Broadstone neighbourhood watch scheme. The bus service runs into Broadstone, not Creekmoor. The Broadstone / Creekmoor boundary is also already well defined, not only by natural woodland, but also the Castleman Trailway. We therefore support the proposal to divide the Broadstone wards into East and West. Each having two councillors, in a similar way to Branksome, Hamworthy and Canford Heath. Part of Broadstone does not then have to be moved into Creekmoor, and this allows all of the Broadstone residents to maintain their Broadstone identity. 1 Local Government Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 2 of 2 8: 9: 10: Comment text: I think that moving half of the Pine Springs area of Broadstone to Creekmoor would not only div de an area that has a strong community bond but would cause diff culties in the future. The characters of the 2 wards are completely different and the existing council has already made this a diff cult move physically by erecting road barriers to make it awkward for Pine Springs res dents to actually drive into Creekmoor. Pine Springs works effectively through ts active involvement with the Broadstone Neighbourhood Watch, supporting the local Broadstone schools and taking part in its events such as the Christmas Parade. Many of us attend the Broadstone Churches and are av d supporters of the local shops. To dismantle this commun ty bond seems pointless, we should be making commun ties stronger, not diluting them. Rather than sending part of the existing Broadstone Ward to Creekmoor, it would make more sense to take this opportunity to move part of the Creekmoor Ward to Broadstone. On the map I have marked an area (in between the markers numbered 1 to 10) which has for years seen itself as part of Broadstone. The residents use the Broadstone shops and many of the older properties have been there for long enough to cons der Broadstone as not only the centre of their commun ty but the only community to which they have any allegiance. By doing this, hopefully the Broadstone ward would be able to support one extra councillor, remain a commun ty w th a strong and active ident ty and Creekmoor could have the number of councillors reduced to 2 to compensate. https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk//node/print/informed-representation/2794 09/01/2014 Fuller, Heather From: Evison, Alison Sent: 07 January 2014 11:17 To: Kingsley, Paul Cc: Fuller, Heather Subject: FW: Ward boundary changes: Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged From: Adi Bailey Sent: 28 December 2013 10:10 To: Evison, Alison Subject: Ward boundary changes: Dear Alison I am writing to request that Edwina Drive remains within the Broadstone ward boundary. We consider ourselves part of the Broadstone community, are dependent on the Broadstone shops, facilities and services and are engaged with Broadstone activities (arts, sports and leisure) so it makes no sense for us to be considered part of Creekmore. Many thanks Adrian Bailey 1 Fuller, Heather From: Kingsley, Paul Sent: 12 December 2013 14:14 To: Fuller, Heather Subject: FW: Proposed Boundary Change - Broadstone Ward Importance: High Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged From: Evison, Alison Sent: 12 December 2013 09:10 To: Kingsley, Paul Subject: FW: Proposed Boundary Change - Broadstone Ward Importance: High From: Jason Barnett Sent: 11 December 2013 19:57 To: Evison, Alison Subject: Proposed Boundary Change - Broadstone Ward Importance: High Dear Madam, I wish to voice my opposition in the strongest terms to the proposal for my neighbourhood to be removed from Broadstone and moved into Creekmoor. It is extremely disappointing that such an inappropriate proposal has again been mooted after a period of more than 10 years and without an appropriate amount of publicity or consultation time allowed. Pinesprings has always been and will always be a valuable and integral part of the Broadstone community and we chose to settle in Pinesprings because it is part of the community in which my wife grew up. Indeed we were married in St Johns Church where my wife attended the congregation. Our two children attend schools in Broadstone and prior to that nursery in Broadstone. Their key friendships have grown through schools in Broadstone. Our daughter is part of Broadstone 1st Brownies and both children are learning to swim at The Junction Leisure Centre in Broadstone. Last weekend both children were in the Broadstone Christmas parade, an important local tradition in which we have all taken part in recent years. We are part of the Broadstone Residents Association. In addition to being located close to the local schools, Pinesprings has a natural affinity with Broadstone for shopping, post office and the Doctors Surgery where we are all registered in addition to other facilities. We enjoy visiting our two nearest pubs; The Blackwater Stream and the Goods Yard. We feel very much part of the Broadstone community and do not wish to be annexed with another with which we have no affinity and are separated from not only by the natural terrain, woods, creeks and a deep valley, but also by the Castleman Trailway. Can I also suggest that the deadline be delayed and the residents given proper notice of this proposal. In a matter of local democracy it is only correct that the people concerned are informed of proposed changes and the reasoning 1 behind them and then given enough time to respond. I do not believe this has happened and wish to voice my annoyance that this has not been the case. Thank you Jason and Katie Barnett 2 Local Government Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 2 Poole Personal Details: Name: Ann Barnley E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database rights 2013. Map Features: Comment text: Subm tted on behalf of Mrs Barnley who does not have an email address: Tel BOUNDARY REVIEW BOROUGH OF POOLE CREEKMOOR/BROADSTONE WARDS I am writing to lend my support for the two Creekmoor Ward boundary options as submitted by the Creekmoor Cllr, the Poole Conservative Associat on and the Broadstone Conservative Branch. I have lived in Creekmoor for many years and it is a really nice close kn t community with all the facil ties you could want close to hand. It provides for all res dents well but especially for our young people w th Youth and Sports Centres/facilities and youth community groups. Broadstone has always been very stand offish and wanting to remove itself from Creekmoor being known locally as the Kingdom of Broadstone with a lot of snob value attached by themselves . I and my neighbours and friends in Creekmoor are therefore very surprised to see that the Broadstone Ward wants to take over port ons of Creekmoor when these areas have always been Creekmoor, e ther historically or when the properties were built as part of the new overall estate in Creekmoor in the 80’s, they were never built as an extension to Broadstone but as part of the commun ty of Creekmoor.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 71 Creekmoor Lane Creekmoor Poole BH17 7BW Price Guide £250000
    71 Creekmoor Lane Creekmoor Poole BH17 7BW Price Guide £250,000 - £255,000 Freehold A TWO DOUBLE BEDROOM DETACHED BUNGALOW SITUATED IN A POPULAR RESIDENTIAL LOCATION WITHIN EASY ACCESS OF LOCAL SHOPS 71 CREEKMOOR LANE, CREEKMOOR, POOLE. 2/ 71 CREEKMOOR LANE, CREEKMOOR, POOLE. 3/ ∗ ENTRANCE HALLWAY ∗ LOUNGE/DINING ROOM 21’11” (MAXIMUM) x 13’2” (MAXIMUM) ∗ SEPARATE DINING ROOM 10’1” x 9’9” ∗ MODERN FITTED KITCHEN 10’6” x 7’ ∗ CONSERVATORY/UTILITY ROOM 8’6” x 7’7” ∗ MASTER BEDROOM 10’1” (EXCLUDING BAY) x 9’9” ∗ GUEST BEDROOM 10’1” (EXCLUDING BAY) x 9’9” ∗ FAMILY BATHROOM 9’3” x 5’4” ∗ OFF ROAD PARKING ∗ GOOD SIZE REAR GARDEN ∗ GAS FIRED CENTRAL HEATING ∗ UPVC DOUBLE GLAZED 71 CREEKMOOR LANE, CREEKMOOR, POOLE. 4/ 71 CREEKMOOR LANE, CREEKMOOR, POOLE. 5/ 71 CREEKMOOR LANE, CREEKMOOR, POOLE. 6/ 71 CREEKMOOR LANE, CREEKMOOR, POOLE. 7/ ABOUT THIS PROPERTY A double glazed frosted front door with matching side screen gives access to the small entrance porch which in turn via a timber glazed door leads into the entrance hallway which has wood effect flooring and loft access via a hatch. The spacious lounge/dining room has TV point, telephone point and sliding patio doors to the rear garden. The separate dining room has partially frosted window to side aspect, wall mounted boiler and access in to the modern kitchen which has a range of wall and floor mounted cupboards, roll top work surfaces, nest of four drawers, single sink with drainer and mixer tap, integrated appliances include oven, four ring hob and extractor fan over.
    [Show full text]
  • Borough of Poole Unitary Authority Preliminary Flood Risk Assessment
    APPENDIX 1 Borough of Poole Unitary Authority Preliminary Flood Risk Assessment Draft Final Report v3 June 2011 1. Executive Summary This report has been prepared to assist Borough of Poole in meeting their duties to manage local flood risk and deliver the requirements of the Flood Risk Regulations (2009). The Borough of Poole, as a unitary authority, is defined as a lead local flood authority (LLFA) within the regulations. This report represents the first stage of the requirements set out in the regulations. The Preliminary Flood Risk Assessment (PFRA) process is aimed at providing a high level overview of flood risk from local sources, primarily flooding from surface water, groundwater and ordinary watercourses. Flooding associated with the sea, main rivers and reservoirs is the responsibility of the Environment Agency and does not need to be considered as part of this report. The completed PFRA report must be submitted by Borough of Poole to the Environment Agency for review by 22 June 2011. The PFRA has been produced based on the Environment Agency‟s Final PFRA Guidance and Defra‟s Guidance on selecting Flood Risk Areas, both published in December 2010. Using the national methodology set by Defra, the Environment Agency identified indicative Flood Risk Areas across England. Of the ten areas identified, none of these fall within the Borough of Poole. This simply means that parts of the PFRA mandatory documentation is not applicable to Poole and therefore will not require completion. In order to gain a clearer understanding of the flood risk across the Borough of Poole, flood risk data and historic flood events were collected from local and national sources, the Environment Agency, water companies, emergency services and other risk management authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Boundary Review 2013 England Secondary Consultation
    Boundary Review 2013 England Secondary Consultation Submission of the Labour Party Page 1 of 50 1) General Points a) Submission This submission is made on behalf of the Labour Party and the nine regional Labour parties within England. The submission represents the Labour’s Party’s response to the representations made to the Commission, both orally at the public hearings and in writing during the Initial Consultation Period and published by the Commission on 6 March 2012. The Labour Party made a detailed formal submission of its own which included a number of counter proposals. We have now considered the options further in each region, including those counter proposals submitted by others. We will refer to them in this response. While we are not formally amending our submission we will indicate those points and proposals with which we agree, and those with which we disagree. b) Factors to be considered In assessing the merits of different proposals we will as far as possible be guided by the stipulations of Clause 5 (1) of Schedule 2 to the Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Act 2011 which lays down the rules by which the Commission shall conduct the review. Under the terms of the Act1, the Commission may, in choosing between different schemes, take into account i) Special Geographical Circumstances, including the size shape and accessibility of a constituency ii) Local government boundaries iii) The boundaries of existing constituencies iv) Any local ties that would be broken by changes to constituencies 1 Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Act 2011, Schedule 2 Clause 5 (1).
    [Show full text]
  • Poole Matters
    Poole Matters Delivering for You in Creekmoor 2019 SUCCESS FOR YOU IN CREEKMOOR, HILLBOURNE & WATERLOO NEW SCHOOL IN HILLBOURNE FOR 2020 134 NEW AFFORDABLE/SHARED OWNERSHIP HOMES NEW ZEBRA CROSSING ON UPTON ROAD £95,000 COUNCIL GRANT FOR “ROOM TO GROW PROJECT” YOUR NEW COUNCIL WHAT WILL BOURNEMOUTH CHRISTCHURCH & POOLE COUNCIL (BCP) MEAN FOR CONSERVATIVES HELP YOU? RESIDENTS CLEAN UP 1 Services will continue as usual - you should see no noticeable changes. 2 Essential “Front Line” services will be protected. BUILDING HOMES BETTER 3 Poole Civic Centre remains “open for AND FASTER business” for the foreseeable future. STEVE HAYES our new prospective 4 We’ll take best practice from the 3 Creekmoor Ward Candidate existing Councils to the new Council. met with the Housing Minister Kit Malthouse. 5 We’ll ensure Creekmoor retains a strong voice in the new Council. Steve with 35 years experience in Social Housing said, “Working with the local community is key to providing more truly ‘Affordable’ quality homes, building them 2019 AND BEYOND better and faster”! YOU ASKED WE ANSWERED YOUR WARD SURGERIES How many Cllrs will be on the No - there will now be 76 Cllrs new BCP Council, is it still 120? saving £500k a year! Want to talk directly with your Councillors? Why are 2 new Dorset Councils, being Both Councils will have a bigger We hold regular surgeries open to all created, replacing the 9 existing voice to attract better Government Creekmoor residents at Creekmoor Library on Councils? funding. the first Monday of each month, 4-6pm. How many Cllrs will represent the No - there will be 2 Cllrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Resident Submissions to the Borough of Poole Electoral Review
    Local resident submissions to the Borough of Poole electoral review This PDF document contains 56 submissions surnames P-Z. Some versions of Adobe allow the viewer to move quickly between bookmarks. Click on the submission you would like to view. If you are not taken to that page, please scroll through the document. Local Government Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 2 Poole Personal Details: Name: Ronald Planner E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database rights 2013. Map Features: Comment text: We live at Edwina Drive, and strongly object to the boundry being changed to bring us into the Creekmoor Ward. Our church, supermarkets,shops, doctor, dentist,chiropractor and library are all in Broadstone, where we regularly vis t and we are part of that community not that of Creekmoor. We therefore want to continue to vote for Broadstone councillors, so that we can continue to have a say in our own area. https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk//node/print/informed-representation/2721 12/12/2013 Local Government Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 2 of 2 https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk//node/print/informed-representation/2721 12/12/2013 Fuller, Heather From: Evison, Alison Sent: 07 January 2014 11:13 To: Kingsley, Paul Cc: Fuller, Heather Subject: FW: Dorset - Poole area proposed boundary changes Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged From: Tony Preston Sent: 05 January 2014 10:52 To: Evison, Alison Subject: Dorset - Poole area proposed boundary changes Dear Alison, I understand that the Government Boundary Commission are looking at moving parts of Broadstone into the Creekmoor ward, my family & I live in an area called Pinesprings within the Broadstone area which under the current proposals would be split into two distinct areas & would see the part we live in fall under a Creekmoor ward.
    [Show full text]
  • Ward Profile – Creekmoor Produced by the Corporate Research Team, Borough of Poole – Mar 2016
    Ward Profile – Creekmoor Produced by the Corporate Research Team, Borough of Poole – Mar 2016 Ward Profile – Creekmoor 1 Purpose of this profile The ward profiles provide an ongoing information update on social and economic data for all of Poole’s sixteen wards. Each profile compares against average Poole figures. As far as possible the statistical information within this document is the most recently available at the time. Data sources are identified for each chart and table. These profiles use data from the 2011 Census however more in-depth Census Ward profiles were produced by the Corporate Research Team in August 2013. Please go to www.boroughofpoole.com/2011census for more information on the 2011 Census. Ward boundaries were changed slightly in 2014. These profiles are based on boundaries prior to this date. New profiles will be prepared for the new ward boundaries in due course. Overview Creekmoor Ward is located in the west of Poole and shares boundaries with Broadstone, Canford Heath West, Oakdale and Hamworthy West. Residential areas are located in the north, west and central areas of the ward, with an industrial/retail area in the east. Upton House and Upton Country Park are located in the south and the Castleman Trailway runs from Upton Country Park, through Creekmoor to Merley. There is no dentist located within the ward boundary, or within 250 metres of the boundary in neighbouring wards. However there is a dental repair service that has an office on Marshal Road. Political Representation Creekmoor Ward is represented by three Conservative Party councillors – Les Burden, Judy Butt and John Rampton.
    [Show full text]
  • Ward Profile – Broadstone Produced by the Corporate Research and GIS Teams – Mar 2016
    Ward Profile – Broadstone Produced by the Corporate Research and GIS Teams – Mar 2016 Ward Profile – Broadstone 1 Purpose of this profile The ward profiles provide an ongoing information update on social and economic data for all of Poole’s sixteen wards. Each profile compares against average Poole figures. As far as possible the statistical information within this document is the most recently available at the time. Data sources are indentified for each chart and table. These profiles use data from the 2011 Census however more in-depth Census Ward profiles were produced by the Corporate Research Team in August 2013. Please go to www.boroughofpoole.com/2011census for more information on the 2011 Census. Ward boundaries were changed slightly in 2014. These profiles are based on boundaries prior to this date. New profiles will be prepared for the new ward boundaries in due course. Overview Broadstone ward is located to the west of Poole and shares boundaries with Merley and Bearwood, Canford Heath West and Creekmoor Wards. The north of the ward is mainly covered by green space, consisting of Delph Woods, the Castleman Trailway (runs from Creekmoor to Merley) and Broadstone golf course. Broadstone Recreation Ground is located to the South East of the ward. The remainder of the ward is mostly residential, with local facilities and retail clustered around the high street in the centre of the ward (lower Blandford Road). There is a post office located on Dunyeats Road. Political Representation Broadstone Ward is represented by one Liberal Democrat Councillor, Mike Brooke and two Conservative Councillors, David Newall and Joanne Tomlin.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Resident Submissions to the Poole Borough Council Electoral Review
    Local resident submissions to the Poole Borough Council electoral review This PDF document contains 28 submissions with surnames L- R. Some versions of Adobe allow the viewer to move quickly between bookmarks. Click on the submission you would like to view. If you are not taken to that page, please scroll through the document. From: Peter Lambert Sent: 19 June 2014 01:14 To: Reviews@ Subject: Boundry Consultation Dear Sir Madam I have read the draft proposals from the Boundary Commissioner in respect to Creekmoor and Broadstone in Poole, Dorset and I fully support the Boundary Commissioner’s proposals as the least disruptive of the options, with minimal change to the local community that ensures the close community feel of Creekmoor is maintained. Regards Peter Lambert Kingsley, Paul From: Fuller, Heather Sent: 06 May 2014 09:27 To: Kingsley, Paul Subject: FW: Boundary changes to Broadstone Categories: Poole, Submission From: Simon Lander Sent: 02 May 2014 21:31 To: Reviews@ Subject: Boundary changes to Broadstone Dear sirs, We are writing regarding the boundary changes to the Broadstone Area. As a resident of we are firmly against any changes to our boundary , we moved here 3 years ago to bring our family up within the Broadstone area, due to the area being very well respected & having great schools , we paid around £250,000 for a house which if it wasn't within this boundary and was in the creekmoor boundary the same size property would have been around £20‐ 30,000 less. We like living in the Broadstone community and are very happy here & our child is going to one of the Broadstone Schools, we are somewhat confused as to why these changes have been put forward or are going to be put forward as we can see that this would not gain anything from this but would cause a lot of bad feeling amongst the Broadstone residents.
    [Show full text]
  • Keyline Pool
    TRADE COUNTER INVESTMENT LET TO TRAVIS PERKINS (PROPERTIES) LTD AND GUARANTEED BY TRAVIS PERKINS PLC - 18.5 YEARS WITH RPI LINKED REVIEWS CREEKMOOR LANE, POOLE, DORSET, BH17 7EE 18.5 years unexpired to Travis Perkins (Properties) Ltd and guaranteed by Travis Perkins Plc Investment Summary Location & Situation •Afreehold trade counter investment located in Poole, an affuent town on Poole is an affuent town on the south coast of England, located approximately the south coast of England 6 miles to the west of Bournemouth and 11 miles to the west of Christchurch. Bristol is located 69 miles to the north and Exeter is 80 miles to the west. • Two warehouse units totalling approximately 12,278 sq ft and a site of 1.32 acres representing a low site cover of just 20% Poole benefts from excellent road connections with the A35 providing the main arterial route along the south coast linking to Bournemouth, Christchurch and • Let to Travis Perkins (Properties) Ltd, trading as Keyline, with Southampton to the east and Dorchester and Exeter to the west. approximately 18.5 years unexpired and guaranteed by Travis Perkins Plc The A348, A349 and A350 all lead to the A31 to the north and onto the M3 and • A current passing rent of £110,408.05 per annum (£8.99 per sq ft overall) M27 Motorways. The M3 links Poole to the M25 and London and the M27 links subject to 5-yearly rent reviews linked to RPI (2% and 4% per annum to Bournemouth and Southampton. collar and cap) Poole railway station provides direct services to London Waterloo with an • The passing rent equates to a conservative £6.82 per sq ft if applying a half- approximate journey time of 2 hours.
    [Show full text]
  • Poole Borough Council Election Results 1973-1995
    Poole Borough Council Election Results 1973-1995 Colin Rallings and Michael Thrasher The Elections Centre Plymouth University The information contained in this report has been obtained from a number of sources. Election results from the immediate post-reorganisation period were painstakingly collected by Alan Willis largely, although not exclusively, from local newspaper reports. From the mid- 1980s onwards the results have been obtained from each local authority by the Elections Centre. The data are stored in a database designed by Lawrence Ware and maintained by Brian Cheal and others at Plymouth University. Despite our best efforts some information remains elusive whilst we accept that some errors are likely to remain. Notice of any mistakes should be sent to [email protected]. The results sequence can be kept up to date by purchasing copies of the annual Local Elections Handbook, details of which can be obtained by contacting the email address above. Front cover: the graph shows the distribution of percentage vote shares over the period covered by the results. The lines reflect the colours traditionally used by the three main parties. The grey line is the share obtained by Independent candidates while the purple line groups together the vote shares for all other parties. Rear cover: the top graph shows the percentage share of council seats for the main parties as well as those won by Independents and other parties. The lines take account of any by- election changes (but not those resulting from elected councillors switching party allegiance) as well as the transfers of seats during the main round of local election.
    [Show full text]
  • Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council
    7/4/2018 Local Government Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council Personal Details: Name: Cheryl Johnson E-mail: [email protected] Postcode: Organisation Name: Bournemouth Borough Council Comment text: I fully support these proposals. I have been a Councillor with Bournemouth Council since 2008 and I think these proposals would work very well for our town. Thank you. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/13340 1/1 7/4/2018 Local Government Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council Personal Details: Name: Cheryl Johnson E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: I support this proposal. It looks very sensible to me. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/13339 1/1 7/11/2018 Local Government Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council Personal Details: Name: Claire Bath E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Christchurch Borough Council Comment text: I like the revised proposals for the Christchurch wards. I have spent time looking at them and believe they are an improvement on the previous County Council ward boundaries. They reflect the communities and their cohesion and the things that give residents a commonality. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/13534 1/1 7/18/2018 Local Government Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council Personal Details: Name: Ron Parker E-mail: [email protected] Postcode: Organisation Name: Borough of Poole Comment text: I believe the BCP proposals for Parkstone and Oakdale wards better fit the community frame work than the commissions.Parkstone should have three councillor's.
    [Show full text]
  • Ratepayer Billing Address Property Address Rateable Value Property Description
    RATEPAYER BILLING ADDRESS PROPERTY ADDRESS RATEABLE VALUE PROPERTY DESCRIPTION A.S.T.R.A. 310 BOURNEMOUTH ROAD POOLE BH14 9AR GND FLR 19-25 HILL STREET POOLE BH15 1NR 9700 ABBOTS LTD-IN LIQUIDATION C/O PANOS ELIADES FRANKLIN & CO. OLYMPIA HOUSE ARMITAGE ROAD NW11 8RQ UNIT 12 BRANKSOME BUSINESS PARK BOURNE VALLEY ROAD POOLE BH12 1DW 19250 ADASTRAL MANAGEMENT CO LTD C/O BOURNE ESTATES LTD UNIT 4 BRANKSOME BUSINESS PARKBOURNE VALLEY ROAD BH12 1DW OFFICE DOWNLAND PLACE ADASTRAL ROAD POOLE DORSET BH17 8SA 2650 Offices ALBERT WAESCHLE LTD 11 BALENA CLOSE POOLE BH17 7DB 9 BALENA CLOSE POOLE DORSET BH17 7DB 9400 Warehouse ALL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL LTD UNIT 4 FLEETSBRIDGE BUS.CENTRE UPTON ROAD POOLE BH17 7AF 8 FLEETSBRIDGE BUSINESS CENTRE UPTON ROAD POOLE DORSET BH17 7AF 26250 Workshop ANKERS & RAWLINGS DEVELOPMENTS LTD 22 RINGWOOD ROAD LONGHAM FERNDOWN BH22 9AN UNIT 20 BRANKSOME BUSINESS PARK BOURNE VALLEY ROAD POOLE DORSET BH12 1DW 32000 ANKERS & RAWLINGS DEVELOPMENTS LTD 22 RINGWOOD ROAD LONGHAM FERNDOWN BH22 9AN SUITE 9 BRANKSOME PARK HOUSE BRANKSOME BUSINESS PARK BOURNE VALLEY ROAD POOLE BH12 1ED 17000 ANKERS & RAWLINGS DEVELOPMENTS LTD 22 RINGWOOD ROAD LONGHAM FERNDOWN BH22 9AN SUITE 12 BRANKSOME PARK HOUSE BRANKSOME BUSINESS PARK BOURNE VALLEY ROAD POOLE BH12 1ED 15250 ANKERS & RAWLINGS DIRECTORS PENSION PLAN 22 RINGWOOD ROAD LONGHAM FERNDOWN BH22 9AN UNIT 1 CONCEPT CENTRE INNOVATION CLOSE POOLE DORSET BH12 4QT 27500 ANKERS & RAWLINGS DIRECTORS PENSION PLAN 22 RINGWOOD ROAD LONGHAM FERNDOWN BH22 9AN UNIT 2 CONCEPT CENTRE INNOVATION CLOSE
    [Show full text]