DOCSLIB.ORG

Adaptive Public Space: Places for People in the Pandemic and Beyond Download

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Adaptive Public Space: Places for People in the Pandemic and Beyond Download Adaptive Public Space Places for People in the Pandemic and Beyond A COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT OF SEVEN SITES IN AKRON, DETROIT, PHILADELPHIA, AND SAN JOSE MARCH 2021 ABOUT THIS DOCUMENT Gehl evaluated the impact of seven public spaces Gehl / New York 395 Hudson Street, 8th Floor — each funded in part by Knight Foundation — in New York, NY 10014 Akron, Detroit, Philadelphia, and San Jose. Between September 2020 and February 2021, Gehl engaged www.gehlpeople.com a range of stakeholders and leveraged a mix of data [email protected] sources to uncover challenges and opportunities unique and common to these projects. Enclosed are the findings from this process. GEHL KNIGHT FOUNDATION Matthew Lister Evette Alexander Managing Director Director of Learning & Impact Julia Day Lilly Weinberg Director Senior Director of Community Eamon O’Connor & National Initiatives Project Manager Kyle Kutuchief Olivia Flynn Program Director, Akron Designer Rebecca Cook Designer Adriana Akers Reference Sofie Thorsen Reference Knight Foundation & Gehl 2 Contents INTRODUCTION Executive Summary 4 Overview of Public Spaces Studied 12 FINDINGS 2020 in Focus 16 1 / Everyday Public Space 20 2 / Residents at the Center 30 3 / Community Ripple Effect 40 4 / Sustaining in the Long Run 50 CONCLUSION Considerations for the Field 58 APPENDICES 1 / Methodology 64 2 / Online Survey Analysis 70 3 / Social Media Analysis 76 3 Adaptive Public Space EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This study of seven flagship public spaces reveals how local leaders generated impact through their responsiveness to community needs — laying the groundwork for more equitable outcomes and greater resilience during the pandemic. uilding on its longtime The Approach Everyday Public Space: How do commitment to design and programming shape public spaces, Knight Located in Akron, Detroit, visitors’ use of and engagement with the space? Foundation commissioned Philadelphia, and San Jose, BGehl — a global urban planning, the seven projects in this study Residents at the Center: How design, and strategy firm — to represent $5 million in direct conduct an impact assessment of does the space reflect, welcome, Knight investments. An additional and empower those who live in the seven public spaces in its portfolio. $50 million in co-funding and community? The findings illustrate the power follow-on investments from other of public space as a platform funders including the Reimagining Community Ripple Effect: What for community development: the Civic Commons network went broader impacts is the space having whether by building resident trust, toward these sites, wider area on the community, city, and beyond? spurring social activity, supporting improvements and ongoing space economic and workforce operations. The spaces range Sustaining in the Long Run: How development, or catalyzing widely: neighborhood parks that does the project sustain operationally neighborhood change. give residents a go-to gathering and financially over time? spot; nature spaces that re-engage This power makes public spaces a locals with the outdoors; and COVID-19: Are residents visiting key ingredient in the recovery from citywide destinations that offer art these projects amid the pandemic, and how are operators adapting to COVID-19 — a crisis that has raised studios, beachscapes, and more. new conditions? the stakes for overcoming deeply rooted, systemic challenges in our Given the diversity of spaces, this The Gehl team gathered pre- and cities. For policymakers, funders, study did not set out to measure mid-pandemic data from multiple and practitioners, these findings the spaces against one another sources, including: interviews and are a call to action. By elevating using a common set of metrics. The focus groups with over 50 people public spaces, leaders nationwide goal was to understand impacts (including grantees, city government can drive more equitable outcomes related to four core themes, and to leaders, volunteers and artists-in- in the pandemic and beyond. life during the COVID-19 pandemic: residence); an online survey of over Knight Foundation & Gehl 4 800 respondents near each space; programming, historic character, 67 percent felt the spaces were existing and new observational data and the arts invited regular essential to their neighborhoods — on space use; and an analysis of over activity. Across the board, 82 figures that rose for neighborhood 450 posts of geotagged Instagram percent of survey respondents parks especially. activity. The findings that follow are feel positively about these the result of this multi-method study. projects and 59 percent visit at Participatory engagement least monthly. The two multi- methods helped build this resident The Findings functional neighborhood spaces belonging and attachment. For — Detroit’s Ella Fitzgerald Park example, at Akron’s Summit Lake Public spaces manifest in the and Philadelphia’s Centennial Park — which used prototypes physical world, but what really Commons — had the highest to engage residents during the makes them tick is people. As such, rates of regular visitors. Over half design process — 97 percent of Knight develops partnerships with of respondents visit both spaces respondents felt the project had communities on the ground and at least weekly, suggesting they changed their neighborhood for invests in projects that support offered locals ample reasons to the better, up from 57 percent at the more than design and construction visit — from basketball courts start of the project. Ella Fitzgerald — funding, for example, and playspaces, to porch swings Park and Centennial Commons, engagement processes, incubation and warm-weather movie nights. which adopted similar engagement of new ideas, and workforce The presence of art and historic approaches, also saw the greatest development. In many cases, architecture also helped drive levels of weekly visitors, enthusiasm, Knight and other philanthropic engagement. For example, and attachment. These projects funding sources help absorb risk Philadelphia’s Cherry Street also saw higher rates of attachment for an innovative new concept and Pier — an arts space housed in among Black respondents — catalyze additional investment. a revitalized waterfront site — indeed, near neighborhood parks, had the most active Instagram 79 percent of Black respondents This people-centered model is engagement of all projects, with agreed the space was “special to generating impact. A common over 21,000 followers. me,” compared to 70 percent of all ingredient? High-quality design respondents. and programming that reflected Challenges to everyday use and adapted to local needs. This centered on barriers to access. But for many projects, building approach is what spurred resident For example, the Freight Yard trust among communities of visits and attachment, and what at Detroit Riverfront sits below- color remains a challenge. This enabled these public spaces to grade — a dynamic that deterred was especially true at nature weather disruptions to public life pop-up businesses from posting spaces, for example, where 45 during the COVID-19 pandemic. up at the space, and that leaves percent of Black respondents Even still, project leaders are some visitors asking for more agreed the space was “special confronting and addressing wayfinding. Upcoming investments to me,” compared to 56 percent challenges inherent to public space will address connectivity of all respondents. “[Local management: from site-specific challenges: the Dequindre Cut will Black residents] don’t always barriers to access, to longtime eventually integrate into a 26-mile feel encouraged because they resident distrust. trail under development by the don’t feel outdoor spaces or City, which will improve access and environmental work have always Impacts are organized into five key visibility to multiple neighborhoods. been for them,” says Izzy Nelson, areas. Where possible, findings Community Engagement Manager were compared across space — for Philadelphia Outward Bound types and across all projects, RESIDENTS AT THE CENTER School (POBS) at The Discovery Center. Over time, community- keeping in mind that intended centered programming is starting project outcomes varied. Community participation allowed to draw in more locals to the project organizers to build project; events include mommy- — trust with residents, which in and-me workshops and a talk EVERYDAY PUBLIC SPACE turn increased use and sense of on environmental racism. attachment to the spaces. Across Projects that supported quality all projects, 81 percent of survey design, resident-centered respondents felt they fit in, and Continued on page 8 5 Adaptive Public Space Top Learning from a diverse set of public spaces in Akron, Detroit, Findings Philadelphia, and San Jose Public spaces with a strong foundation of resident engagement helped communities address equitable access and weather the pandemic together. EVERYDAY PUBLIC SPACE Ella Fitzgerald Park in Detroit (left) and Centennial Projects that supported Commons in Philadelphia — flexible neighborhood quality design, BREE GANT PHOTO: spaces — had the most regular visitors, with 54 resident-centered percent visiting each programming, historic at least weekly. Cherry Street Pier, an arts space character, and the arts on a historic Philadelphia pier, spurred the most invited regular activity. Instagram activity. More starting on page 20 RESIDENTS AT THE CENTER The Discovery Center in Philadelphia has Community participation drawn locals with events including mommy-and-me allowed
Load more

Recommended publications
  • J Ohn S. and J Ames L. K Night F Oundation
    A NNUAL REPORT 1999 T HE FIRST FIFTY YEARS J OHN S. AND JAMES L. KNIGHT FOUNDATION he John S. and James L. Kn i ght Fo u n d a ti on was estab- TA B L E O F CO N T E N T S l i s h ed in 1950 as a priva te fo u n d a ti on indepen d en t Tof the Kn i g ht bro t h ers’ n e ws p a per en terpri s e s . It is C h a i r m a n’s Letter 2 ded i c a ted to f urt h ering their ideals of s ervi ce to com mu n i ty, to the highest standards of j o u r n a l i s t ic excell en ce and to the Pr e s i d e n t ’s Message 4 defense of a free pre s s . In both their publishing and ph i l a n t h ropic undert a k i n g s , History 5 the Kn i ght bro t h ers shared a broad vi s i on and uncom m on devo ti on to the com m on wel f a re . It is those ide a l s , as well as Philanthropy Takes Root 6 t h eir ph i l a n t h ropic intere s t s , to wh i ch the Fo u n d a ti on rem a i n s The First Fifty Years 8 f a i t h f u l .
    [Show full text]
  • Knight Foundation Supports Positive Youth Development
    John S. and James L. Knight Foundation Writing the Story of Transformation Knight Foundation Supports Positive Youth Development Author Wellsys Corporation December 1, 2006 Commissioned by Julie E. Tarr, Ph.D., Director of Evaluation, [email protected] John S. and James L. Knight Foundation Abstract Knight Foundation funded 39 grants in eight communities that focused on positive outcomes for youth. To aid understanding of these grants for future decision-making, Knight Foundation engaged Wellsys Corporation to conduct this assessment for the period 2005-2007. Programs that had the greatest success and possibility for sustainability were connected to many community partners, offering joint services in some cases. Communities Akron, Ohio; Bradenton, Fla.; Columbia, S.C.; Columbus, Ga.; Fort Wayne, Ind.; Macon, Ga.; Milledgeville, Ga.; Palm Beach County, Fla.; JOHN S. AND JAMES L. KNIGHT FOUNDATION YOUTH CLUSTER ASSESSMENT ANNUAL REPORT DECEMBER 2006 This document was prepared by Wellsys Corporation. Wellsys Corporation 3783 Presidential Parkway, Suite113 Atlanta, Georgia 30340-9998 770-455-0928 770-455-0929 (fax) 800-293-7322 www.wellsyscorp.com [email protected] Navigating directions for people and systems. John S. and James L. Knight Foundation December 1, 2006 Youth Cluster Assessment-Annual Report-Final Wellsys Corporation TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction………………………………………………………………………….…………...1 II. Methodology……………………………………………………………………………………...3 III. Grants and Grantees Overview…………………………………………………………….4 IV. Community Connections
    [Show full text]
  • Final Edition: Journalism According to Jack and Jim Knight
    Final Edition: Journalism According to Jack and Jim Knight John S. (Jack) and James (Jim) Knight were Akron brothers and prominent national figures, who owned and ran the Akron Beacon Journal newspaper in the 1900s. The two brothers, who inherited the Beacon Journal from their father, worked together to build up that newspaper into a strong editorial voice and business force that helped steer the city and the region. Eventually, the two parlayed the Akron paper into the flagship of a powerful, influential newspaper chain that included the Miami Herald, Detroit Free Press, San Jose Mercury News and the Philadelphia Inquirer. By 1981, the Knight-Ridder newspaper chain included 32 newspapers in 17 states, employed 15,000 workers and had a circulation of 3.6 million daily. The brothers also founded the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation (Miami), which remains one of the largest philanthropic organizations in the nation. Knight-Ridder Newspapers did not fare as well. The prize-winning newspaper group, at one time the nation's largest, was sold to the McClatchy Co. in 2006 for $4.5 billion in cash and stock. Since then, McClatchy has sold off 12 Knight-Ridder newspapers to other corporations. The Beacon Journal was sold to Black Press Ltd., a Canadian publishing company. The hour-long documentary tells the story of the Knight family, the Beacon Journal and the rise and fall of the Knight-Ridder newspaper group. The documentary was written and produced by Paul Jacoway, of Paul R. Jacoway Productions of Akron, and Kathleen Endres, distinguished professor of Communication at The University of Akron, and directed by Jacoway.
    [Show full text]
  • 990-Pf, Part Iv John S
    Return of Private Foundation OMB No. 1545-0052 Form 990-PF or Section 4947(a)(1) Trust Treated as Private Foundation Department of the Treasury | Do not enter social security numbers on this form as it may be made public. 2014 Internal Revenue Service | Information about Form 990-PF and its separate instructions is at www.irs.gov/form990pf. Open to Public Inspection For calendar year 2014 or tax year beginning , and ending Name of foundation A Employer identification number JOHN S. AND JAMES L. KNIGHT FOUNDATION 65-0464177 Number and street (or P.O. box number if mail is not delivered to street address) Room/suite B Telephone number 200 SOUTH BISCAYNE BLVD, #3300 305-908-2600 City or town, state or province, country, and ZIP or foreign postal code C If exemption application is pending, check here~| MIAMI, FL 33131-2349 G Check all that apply: Initial return Initial return of a former public charity D 1. Foreign organizations, check here ~~| Final return Amended return 2. Foreign organizations meeting the 85% test, Address change Name change check here and attach computation ~~~~| H Check type of organization: X Section 501(c)(3) exempt private foundation E If private foundation status was terminated Section 4947(a)(1) nonexempt charitable trust Other taxable private foundation under section 507(b)(1)(A), check here ~| I Fair market value of all assets at end of year J Accounting method: Cash X Accrual F If the foundation is in a 60-month termination (from Part II, col. (c), line 16) Other (specify) under section 507(b)(1)(B), check here ~| | $ 2,285,572,378.
    [Show full text]
  • Tax Year 2019 Knight Foundation Form 990-PF
    **PUBLIC DISCLOSURE COPY** Return of Private Foundation OMB No. 1545+0047 Form 990+PF or Section 4947(a)(1) Trust Treated as Private Foundation | Do not enter social security numbers on this form as it may be made public. Department of the Treasury 2019 Internal Revenue Service | Go to www.irs.gov/Form990PF for instructions and the latest information. Open to Public Inspection For calendar year 2019 or tax year beginning , and ending Name of foundation A Employer identification number JOHN S. AND JAMES L. KNIGHT FOUNDATION 650464177 Number and street (or P.O. box number if mail is not delivered to street address) Room/suite B Telephone number 200 S BISCAYNE BLVD STE 3300 (305) 9082600 City or town, state or province, country, and ZIP or foreign postal code C If exemption application is pending, check here ~| MIAMI, FL 331312349 G Check all that apply: Initial return Initial return of a former public charityD1. Foreign organizations, check here ~~ | Final return Amended return 2. Foreign organizations meeting the 85% test, Address change Name changecheck here and attach computation ~~~~ | X H Check type of organization: Section 501(c)(3) exempt private foundation E If private foundation status was terminated Section 4947(a)(1) nonexempt charitable trust Other taxable private foundationunder section 507(b)(1)(A), check here ~ | X IJFair market value of all assets at end of year Accounting method: Cash Accrual F If the foundation is in a 60+month termination (from Part II, col. (c), line 16) Other (specify) under section 507(b)(1)(B), check here ~ | | $ 2,283,660,148.
    [Show full text]
  • Tax Year 2018 Knight Foundation Form 990-PF
    Return of Private Foundation OMB No. 1545-0052 Form 990-PF or Section 4947(a)(1) Trust Treated as Private Foundation | Do not enter social security numbers on this form as it may be made public. Department of the Treasury 2018 Internal Revenue Service | Go to www.irs.gov/Form990PF for instructions and the latest information. Open to Public Inspection For calendar year 2018 or tax year beginning , and ending Name of foundation A Employer identification number JOHN S. AND JAMES L. KNIGHT FOUNDATION 65-0464177 Number and street (or P.O. box number if mail is not delivered to street address) Room/suite B Telephone number 200 S BISCAYNE BLVD STE 3300 (305) 908-2600 City or town, state or province, country, and ZIP or foreign postal code C If exemption application is pending, check here ~ | MIAMI, FL 33131-2349 G Check all that apply: Initial return Initial return of a former public charity D 1. Foreign organizations, check here ~~ | Final return Amended return 2. Foreign organizations meeting the 85% test, Address change Name change check here and attach computation ~~~~ | X H Check type of organization: Section 501(c)(3) exempt private foundation E If private foundation status was terminated Section 4947(a)(1) nonexempt charitable trust Other taxable private foundation under section 507(b)(1)(A), check here ~ | X I Fair market value of all assets at end of yearJ Accounting method: Cash Accrual F If the foundation is in a 60-month termination (from Part II, col. (c), line 16) Other (specify) under section 507(b)(1)(B), check here ~ | | $ 2,115,429,411.
    [Show full text]
  • BRIGHT SPOTS in COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT Case Studies of U.S
    with support from BRIGHT SPOTS IN COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT Case Studies of U.S. Communities Creating Greater Civic Participation from the Bottom Up Photo credit: Knight Foundation By Christopher Hoene, Christopher Kingsley and Matthew Leighninger April 2013 ABOUT THE PROJECT In partnership with the The John S. and James L. Knight Foundation, the National League of Cities commenced a project on community engagement bright spots in the fall of 2011. The purposes of the project were to: Identify promising practices and models in communities that are successfully engaging citizens in local problem-solving efforts Develop a series of city examples and case studies highlighting key elements and strategies embedded in these local initiatives In the initial phase of the project, drawing on the experience of the Knight Foundation in communities where it is engaged as well as on the National League of Cities’ prior work with city leaders, we conducted phone interviews with community leaders. The National League of Cities then followed with in-depth scans of initiatives that showed particular promise in 14 communities across our nation of varying size and character. The types of efforts we looked to identify in these community scans met one or more of the following the criteria: Efforts that employ new tools and strategies such as technology-based tools Efforts with a broader reach that engaged diverse segments of the community Efforts that have had notable successes and outcomes Efforts that evolved to employ different strategies and tools sustainably over time In the second phase of the project, in consultation with the Knight Foundation, the National League of Cities selected initiatives in four communities for in-depth case studies, including further research, interviews, and site visits.
    [Show full text]
  • 2001 Knight Foundation Annual Report
    KNIGHT’S SEPT. 11TH FUND SUPPORTED 246 SERVICE PROVIDERS IN 26 COMMUNITIES: LONG BEACH DAY NURSERY • SEXUAL ASSAULT CRISIS AGENCY • LOAVES AND FISHES • COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP FOR HOMELESS • DAILY BREAD FOOD BANK • FARM SHARE • S.O.S. HEALTH CARE • PHILADELPHIA COMMITTEE FOR THE HOMELESS • THE VILLAGE OF ARTS AND HUMANITIES • ASIAN AMERICANS FOR COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY • IMMIGRANT RESETTLEMENT AND CULTURAL CENTER • PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE • SUPPORT NETWORK FOR BATTERED WOMEN • CHILDREN’S HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDA (NORTH CENTRAL DIVISION) • MOTHERS IN CRISIS • SAFE HARBOR • BATTERED WOMEN’S SHELTER • GOOD NEIGHBORS • SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF SANTA CLARA AND SAN MATEO COUNTIES • THE SALVATION ARMY (MILLEDGEVILLE) • GULF COAST WOMEN’S CENTER FOR NONVIOLENCE • AID TO VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC ABUSE • COMMITTEE FOR DIGNITY AND FAIRNESS FOR THE HOMELESS HOUSING DEVELOPMENT • BOULDER COUNTY SAFEHOUSE • LONGMONT COALITION FOR WOMEN IN CRISIS • MEALS ON WHEELS PLUS OF MANATEE • THE SALVATION ARMY (GULFPORT) • INFO LINE • CRISIS ASSISTANCE MINISTRY •THE FAMILY CENTER • HARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK • SISTERCARE • OPEN DOOR COMMUNITY HOUSE • SCAN • ST. VINCENT DE PAUL OF SAN MATEO • ST. PETER’S HOME FOR BOYS • ARAB COMMUNITY CENTER FOR ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL SERVICES • FOCUS: HOPE • ARAB-CHALDEAN COMMUNITY SOCIAL SERVICES COUNCIL • BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SUMMIT COUNTY • AIDS TASK FORCE • DETROIT RESCUE MISSION MINISTRIES • FORGOTTEN HARVEST • HAVEN • THE SALVATION ARMY (AKRON) • BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF GREATER MIAMI • CATHOLIC CHARITIES
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Knight Media Forum Participant List Migell Acosta Bill Adair Chris
    2020 Knight Media Forum Participant List Migell Acosta Nathalie Applewhite Nancy Barnes San Diego County Library Pulitzer Center on Crisis NPR/ National Public Radio Reporting Bill Adair Marty Baron Duke University Sherrie Arb The Washington Post Community Foundation for Chris Adamo Southeast Michigan Chris Barr WhereByUs, Inc. Knight Foundation Maria Archangelo Debra Adams Simmons Chalkbeat John Barth National Geographic Magazine PRX Andrea Armeni Lisa Adkins Transform Finance Sarah Bartlett Blue Grass Community CUNY Graduate School of Foundation Daniel O. Ash Journalism Chicago Community Trust Karen Ager Taylor Batten Endowment for Health Kayce Ataiyero The Charlotte Observer The Joyce Foundation Allison Ahcan Dr. Battinto L. Batts Jr. Blandin Foundation Karen Avery Scripps Howard Foundation PBS Foundation Jason Alcorn Becca Baumbach American Journalism Project Harry Backlund Community Foundation of Grand City Bureau Forks, East Grand Forks & Region Evette Alexander Knight Foundation Sarah Baird Christopher Baxter Shoeleather Spotlight PA Joëlle Allen Peacock Foundation, Inc. Kali Baker Michele Beatty Omaha Community Foundation South Florida Times Ivye Allen Foundation for the Mid South Brian Bannon Robert Beatty New York Public Library South Florida Times Erica Anderson Vox Media John Bare Matthew Beatty Arthur M. Blank Family The Miami Foundation Dale Anglin Foundation The Cleveland Foundation Alicia Bell Chris Barge Free Press Talal Ansari Community Foundation Boulder The Wall Street Journal County Elizabeth Bell Wilburforce Foundation
    [Show full text]
  • The Search for Shining Eyes
    T he S ear c h f Wachovia Financial Center o r Shining E 200 South Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 3300 Miami, Fla. 33131-2349 y (305) 908-2600 es www.knightfdn.org The Search for Shining Eyes A “The Search for Shining Eyes offers a compelling account of a 10-year experiment udie Audiences, Leadership and Change in the Symphony Orchestra Field to rethink the relationship between symphony orchestras and their audiences. It nc challenges assumptions and dispels many myths about the fate of classical music. es, L Without shirking from the problems, it offers a refreshingly optimistic view for ea d the future. At its heart is a welcome open-mindedness about what a concert might e r ship and C Dr. Thomas Wolf be and how audiences might be found, engaged and developed.” Wolf, Keens & Company Julian Johnson hang St. Anne’s College, Oxford Author, Who Needs Classical Music? e in the S y mp “Wolf has done an excellent job documenting and demystifying for the public at ho large just what foundations at their best can be about. It is rare to see the onion n y Or peeled back. For that reason alone it is an important contribution to our under- c standing of philanthropy.” hest r a Fie Robert Crane ld President, JEHT Foundation “The Search for Shining Eyes is succinct, transparent in approach, nonapologetic and offers forceful ideas for consideration. The frank transmittal of information Dr . without sugar coating the strengths and weaknesses allows the reader to take a T ho thoughtful and open approach to the ideas being conveyed.
    [Show full text]
  • Why People Love Where They Live and Why It Matters: a National Perspective
    Knight Soul of the Community 2010 Why People Love Where They Live and Why It Matters: A National Perspective Knight Communities OVERALL 1 www.knightfoundation.org Copyright © 2010 Gallup, Inc. All rights reserved. ON TWITTER: #SOTC At the Knight Foundation, our mission is to create more informed and engaged communities. We emphasize transformational projects. The Soul of the Community project reflects this mission. This study offers leaders a radically new way to think about their community and invites creative approaches for improvement. The report, based on interviews with residents in 26 Knight communities, proves that a significant connection exists between residents’ levels of emotional attachment to their community and its economic growth. It presents surprising and nearly universal findings about why people form lasting emotional bonds to where they live. We hope these discoveries inspire renewed engagement in all residents and create lasting, positive change. Paula Lynn Ellis, Vice President/Strategic Initiatives John S. and James L. Knight Foundation 2 SOULOFTHECOMMUNITY.ORG Copyright © 2010 Gallup, Inc. All rights reserved. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction. 4 Community Attachment: An Emotional Connection ........................5 Why Attachment Matters ............................................. 5 The Relationship to Community Outcomes ............................... 6 How Gallup Found the Factors With the Strongest Links to Attachment ........ 9 What Matters Most ................................................. 10 Overall Findings
    [Show full text]
  • Paper Series
    Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy Discussion Paper Series #D‐56, February 2010 Clues in the Rubble: A User‐First Framework for Sustaining Local News By Bill Mitchell Sagan Fellow, Shorenstein Center, Fall 2009 Leader of News Transformation & International Programs, The Poynter Institute © 2010 President and Fellows of Harvard College. All rights reserved. Summary This paper concludes that it’s too soon in journalism’s chaotic transition from analog to digital to settle on long‐term business models. But it argues that the best path to discovering those models is a hybrid approach of creating new value for and by the users of news. The paper tracks user‐focused innovations aimed at helping sustain local news, highlighting several dozen in a typology of four categories: paid content and paid experience (p. 12), advertising (p. 27), partnerships (p. 37) and new ventures (p. 45). The paper urges news organizations to assign responsibility for leading innovation in each area to staff members regarded as especially talented, enterprising and trusted. The paper also suggests 10 experiments to try in 2010 (p. 51), along with a decision‐making grid to evaluate such initiatives against four key considerations (p. 53). Extensive endnotes, with clickable URLs, are included as a user resource (p. 57). When my search for the financial future of news stalled on a question about successful business models, it gained traction with another: What can we learn from what’s not working?1 Immersed in the debris of unlikely solutions, I wondered: What experiments are most likely to yield, someday, the models that elude us today? That question prompted another, which finally got me an answer: The best prospects for sustaining journalism in the future are rooted in the most important stakeholders of itsd past an present: that collection of readers, viewers and listeners also known as users.
    [Show full text]