DOCSLIB.ORG

Personality Disorders: Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor a Measured Response (Dr

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Personality Disorders: Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor a Measured Response (Dr Nicholas Morcos, MD; Roy Morcos, MD, FAAFP Personality disorders: Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor A measured response (Dr. N. Morcos); St. Elizabeth Boardman Hospital, Mercy Health, Ohio (Dr. R. Morcos) Improving your understanding of these disorders will help you identify specific diagnoses, ensure appropriate [email protected]. edu treatment, and reduce frustration during office visits. The authors reported no potential conflict of interest relevant to this article. ersonality disorders (PDs) are common, affecting up PRACTICE to 15% of US adults, and are associated with comorbid RECOMMENDATIONS medical and psychiatric conditions and increased utili- ❯ Maintain a high index of P 1,2 zation of health care resources. Having a basic understand- suspicion for personality ing of these patterns of thinking and behaving can help family disorders (PDs) in patients who appear to be “difficult,” physicians (FPs) identify specific PD diagnoses, ensure appro- and take care to distinguish priate treatment, and reduce the frustration that arises when these diagnoses from primary an individual is viewed as a “difficult patient.” mood, anxiety, and Here we describe the diagnostic features of the disorders psychotic disorders. C in the 3 major clusters of PDs and review an effective approach ❯ Refer patients with PDs for to the management of the most common disorder in each clus- psychotherapy, as it is ter, using a case study patient. considered the mainstay of treatment—particularly for borderline PD. B Defense mechanisms offer clues ❯ Use pharmacotherapy that your patient may have a PD judiciously as an adjunctive Personality is an enduring pattern of inner experience and treatment for PD. B behaviors that is relatively stable across time and in different situations. Such traits comprise an individual’s inherent make- Strength of recommendation (SOR) up.1 PDs are diagnosed when an individual’s personality traits A Good-quality patient-oriented evidence create significant distress or impairment in daily functioning. B Inconsistent or limited-quality Specifically, PDs have a negative impact on cognition, affect, patient-oriented evidence interpersonal relationships, and/or impulse control.1 C Consensus, usual practice, opinion, disease-oriented One of the ways people alleviate distress is by using de- evidence, case series fense mechanisms. Defense mechanisms are unconscious mental processes that individuals use to resolve conflicts, and thereby reduce anxiety and depression on a conscious level. Taken alone, defense mechanisms are not pathologic, but they may become maladaptive in certain stressful circumstances, such as when receiving medical treatment. Recognizing pat- terns of chronic use of certain defense mechanisms may be a clue that your patient has a PD. TABLE 13,4 and TABLE 23,4 provide an overview of common defense mechanisms used by patients with PDs. The American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and 90 THE JOURNAL OF FAMILY PRACTICE | FEBRUARY 2016 | VOL 65, NO 2 Does your patient complain that you don't understand him "the way his other doctor did"? Or does he frequently lose his temper? Perhaps it's time to consider a personality disorder. Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th of a statin, which he believes was adulterated edition (DSM-5) organizes PDs into 3 clus- by the government to be sold at lower cost. ters based on similar and often overlapping Mr. A demonstrates the odd and eccen- symptoms.1 TABLE 31 provides a brief sum- tric beliefs that characterize schizotypal per- mary of the characteristic features of each sonality disorder. How can his FP best help him disorder in these clusters. adhere to his medication regimen? (For the answer, go to page 96.) Cluster A: Odd, eccentric ❚ Schizotypal personality disorder shares Patients with one of these disorders are odd, certain disturbances of thought with schizo- eccentric, or bizarre in their behavior and phrenia, and is believed to exist on a spectrum thinking. There appears to be a genetic link with other primary psychotic disorders. Sup- between cluster A PDs (especially schizotypal) port for this theory comes from the higher rates and schizophrenia.5 These patients rarely seek of schizotypal PD among family members of treatment for their disorder because they have patients with schizophrenia. There is a genetic limited insight into their maladaptive traits.5,6 component to the disorder.3,5,6 Clinically, these patients appear odd CASE 1 u Daniel A, age 57, has hypertension and eccentric with unusual beliefs. They may and hyperlipidemia and comes in to see his have a fascination with magic, clairvoyance, FP for a 6-month follow-up appointment. He telepathy, or other such notions.1,5 Although never misses appointments, but has a history of the perceptual disturbances are unusual and poor adherence with prescribed medications. often bizarre, they are not frank delusions: He enjoys his discussions with you in the office, patients with schizotypal PD are willing to although he often perseverates on conspiracy consider alternative explanations for their theories. He lives alone and has never been beliefs and can engage in rational discussion. IMAGE: ©JOE GORMAN married. He believes that some of the previ- Cognitive deficits, particularly of memory ously prescribed medications, including a statin and attention, are common and distressing to and a thiazide diuretic, were interfering with patients. Frequently, the presenting complaint the absorption of “positive nutrients” in his is depression and anxiety due to the emotional diet. He also refuses to take the generic form discord and isolation from others.1,3,5,6 CONTINUED JFPONLINE.COM VOL 65, NO 2 | FEBRUARY 2016 | THE JOURNAL OF FAMILY PRACTICE 91 TABLE 1 How to respond when patients use these common immature defense mechanisms3,4 Defense Definition Example Management strategies Sample statements mechanism Acting out Patient is unable to A patient screams The main goal is to quickly, and “It is difficult for me contain an impulse, which at the physician and safely, de-escalate the situation. to help you when you can manifest in yelling, threatens to sue Removing oneself from the are screaming. Can we agitation, or even violence. because the patient situation may be needed if safety address your concerns did not receive a is a concern. calmly?” prescription for opioid pain medication for chronic back pain. Splitting Patient has polarized views “My nurse under- Anticipate distinct views of staff “I can see that you are of others as “all good” or stands exactly what and meet with the patient as a upset. Let’s talk about “all bad.” These extreme I am going through, group to present a unified front. how the team and I can views of idealization and but my doctors don’t Recognize that patients’ views of help you.” devaluation can apply to listen to me or their physicians will change over different individuals or understand me at time. With this in mind, do not can be used to describe all—not like at the react strongly to criticism one one individual on separate other hospital.” week and extreme praise the occasions. next. Use splitting to your advan- tage by having a well-liked team member lead discussions with the patient. Passive Patient expresses anger in A patient may stop Recognize that the patient has “What can I do to aggression the form of failure, taking medications anger or hostility and help him to ensure that you get the procrastination, or intentionally “vent” his anger. best possible care?” provocative behavior, arrive late to self-demeaning appointments statements, or because the self-sabotage. physician is perceived to have wronged the patient in some way. Somatization Patient expresses A patient presents This is very challenging to man- “It may be that we psychological distress via with pain that is age. Use empathic statements don’t arrive at a physical symptoms or out of proportion (“This must be awful to deal definitive explanation complaints. to what is found on with”), which may disarm the for your pain or examination and patient and improve rapport. completely eliminate it, studies. Somatiza- Provide evidence-based care and but in the meantime, tion may take on a don't order unnecessary testing let’s focus on ways to delusional quality. at the patient’s insistence. Provide help you manage it in frequent follow-up and your daily routine.” reassurance. Cluster B: Dramatic, erratic lization can be substantial. Because indi- Patients with cluster B PDs are dramatic, viduals with one of these PDs sometimes excessively emotional, confrontational, exhibit reckless and impulsive behavior, erratic, and impulsive in their behaviors.1 physicians should be aware these patients They often have comorbid mood and anxi- have a high risk of physical injuries (fights, ety disorders, as well as a disproportion- accidents, self-injurious behavior), suicide ately high co-occurrence of functional attempts, risky sexual behaviors, and un- disorders.3,7 Their rates of health care uti- planned pregnancy.8,9 92 THE JOURNAL OF FAMILY PRACTICE | FEBRUARY 2016 | VOL 65, NO 2 PERSONALITY DISORDERS TABLE 2 How to respond when patients use neurotic defense mechanisms*3,4 Management Defense mechanism Definition Example Sample statements strategies Isolation of affect Patient separates A patient may speak Provide empathy and “Many people may feel the emotional about witnessing the support, and encour- upset in your situation, response to an death of a loved one in a age patients to feel and I hope you would feel event from the calm, matter-of-fact way. comfortable sharing comfortable sharing any thoughts about that their emotions. concerns you have if they event. arise.” Rationalization Patient justifies A patient might state Engage in a factual “I can see how you might attitudes, behavior, that a 30-lb weight gain discussion with the view it that way, but I’m or emotions by in the first trimester of patient in an wondering if you can see attributing them to pregnancy is healthy empathic tone.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Attachment Styles and Use of Defense Mechanisms: a Study of the Adult Attachment Projective and Cramer's Defense Mechanism Scale
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 8-2006 Attachment Styles and Use of Defense Mechanisms: A Study of the Adult Attachment Projective and Cramer's Defense Mechanism Scale Paul Matthew Hoffman University of Tennessee, Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the Education Commons Recommended Citation Hoffman, Paul Matthew, "Attachment Styles and Use of Defense Mechanisms: A Study of the Adult Attachment Projective and Cramer's Defense Mechanism Scale. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2006. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/4254 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Paul Matthew Hoffman entitled "Attachment Styles and Use of Defense Mechanisms: A Study of the Adult Attachment Projective and Cramer's Defense Mechanism Scale." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Philosophy. Leonard Handler, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend
    [Show full text]
  • Sacred Psychoanalysis” – an Interpretation Of
    “SACRED PSYCHOANALYSIS” – AN INTERPRETATION OF THE EMERGENCE AND ENGAGEMENT OF RELIGION AND SPIRITUALITY IN CONTEMPORARY PSYCHOANALYSIS by JAMES ALISTAIR ROSS A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of Philosophy, Theology and Religion College of Arts and Law The University of Birmingham July 2010 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT From the 1970s the emergence of religion and spirituality in psychoanalysis is a unique development, given its traditional pathologizing stance. This research examines how and why ‘sacred psychoanalysis’ came about and whether this represents a new analytic movement with definable features or a diffuse phenomena within psychoanalysis that parallels developments elsewhere. After identifying the research context, a discussion of definitions and qualitative reflexive methodology follows. An account of religious and spiritual engagement in psychoanalysis in the UK and the USA provides a narrative of key people and texts, with a focus on the theoretical foundations established by Winnicott and Bion. This leads to a detailed examination of the literary narratives of religious and spiritual engagement understood from: Christian; Natural; Maternal; Jewish; Buddhist; Hindu; Muslim; Mystical; and Intersubjective perspectives, synthesized into an interpretative framework of sacred psychoanalysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Defense Mechanisms Your Heart Is the Center of All You Do, All You Feel, and All You Think
    Defense Mechanisms Your heart is the center of all you do, all you feel, and all you think. It is child-like, vulnerable, and carefree until it learns to protect itself from being hurt. The defenses that we use act as walls to protect against emotional pain. Following is a list of typical “walls” we use to protect our hearts. Which walls do you identify with? Think of times when you are struggling the most and ask yourself which of these sets of behaviors you use. Avoidance : Avoidance pretends to see the full magnitude a trauma and/or sin but subtly reduces the size of the problem by moving it into the future. For example, I see that there is an elephant in the middle room. I agree with that fact and realize it is a big problem... but I’ll just deal with it later. Maybe I’ll have time tomorrow or maybe next week. Denial : Denial is when someone choosing to “look away” from or ignore the things in life that they don’t want to deal with. Usually a person is aware of those things but chooses not to look them. For example, there’s an elephant in the middle of the room, but instead of dealing with the problem you just look in the other direction and pretend it’s not there. Displacement : Displacement is transferring an emotion from its original object to a safer, more acceptable substitute. For example, a man it criticized by his boss and feels belittled, unappreciated, and angry. Unable to express his anger at work for fear of retaliation, he comes home and takes it out on his wife, punishes his children, or kicks the dog.
    [Show full text]
  • Intrapsychic Perspectives on Personality
    PSYCHODYNAMIC PERSPECTIVES ON PERSONALITY This educational CAPPE module is part i in section III: Theories of Human Functioning and Spirituality Written by Peter L. VanKatwyk, Ph.D. Introduction Psychodynamic theory goes back more than 100 years and has been a principal influence in the early history of clinical pastoral education (CPE). It is a way of thinking about personality dynamics in interpreting and understanding both the spiritual care-provider and care-receiver. This module will briefly summarize the basic theory and punctuate psychodynamic concepts that have been significant in the study of psychology of religion and theological reflection in the practice of spiritual care and counselling. Psychodynamic theories presently practiced include in historical sequence the following three schools that will be covered in this module: 1. Ego Psychology, following and extending the classic psychoanalytic theory of Freud, with major representatives in Anna Freud, Heinz Hartmann and Erik Erikson. 2. Object Relations Theory, derived from the work of Melanie Klein and members of the “British School,” including those who are prominent in religious studies and the practice of spiritual care: Ronald Fairbairn, Harry Guntrip, and D.W. Winnicott. 3. Self Psychology, modifying psychoanalytic theory with an interpersonal relations focus, originating in Heinz Kohut, systematized and applied for social work and counselling practice by Miriam Elson. In conjunction these psychodynamic theories offer three main perspectives on personality: 1. the human mind harbors conflict – with powerful unconscious forces that are continually thwarted in expressing themselves by a broad range of counteracting psychological processes and defense mechanisms. 2. each person carries an unconscious internalized world of personal relationships – with mental representations that reflect earlier experiences of self and others which often surface as patterns in current relationships and interpersonal problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Treating Somatization
    TREATING SOMATIZATION TREATING SOMATIZATION A Cognitive-Behavioral Approach Robert L. Woolfolk Lesley A. Allen THE GUILFORD PRESS New York London © 2007 The Guilford Press A Division of Guilford Publications, Inc. 72 Spring Street, New York, NY 10012 www.guilford.com All rights reserved Except as indicated, no part of this book may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, microfilming, recording, or otherwise, without written permission from the Publisher. Printed in the United States of America This book is printed on acid-free paper. Last digit is print number:987654321 LIMITED PHOTOCOPY LICENSE These materials are intended for use only by qualified mental health profes- sionals. The Publisher grants to individual purchasers of this book nonassignable permission to reproduce all materials for which photocopying permission is specifically granted in a footnote. This license is limited to you, the individ- ual purchaser, for use with your own clients and patients. It does not extend to additional clinicians or practice settings, nor does purchase by an institu- tion constitute a site license. This license does not grant the right to reproduce these materials for resale, redistribution, or any other purposes (including but not limited to books, pamphlets, articles, video- or audiotapes, and hand- outs or slides for lectures or workshops). Permission to reproduce these materials for these and any other purposes must be obtained in writing from the Permissions Department of Guilford Publications. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Woolfolk, Robert L. Treating somatization : a cognitive-behavioral approach / by Robert L.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating Correlations Between Defence Mechanisms and Pathological Personality Characteristics
    rev colomb psiquiat. 2019;48(4):232–243 www.elsevier.es/rcp Artículo original Investigating Correlations Between Defence Mechanisms and Pathological Personality Characteristics Lucas de Francisco Carvalho ∗, Ana Maria Reis, Giselle Pianowski Department of Psicology, Universidade São Francisco, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil article info abstract Article history: Introduction: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between defence Received 4 October 2017 mechanisms and pathological personality traits. Accepted 10 January 2018 Material and methods: We analysed 320 participants aged from 18 to 64 years (70.6% women, Available online 10 February 2018 87.5% university students) who completed the Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory (IDCP) and the Defence Style Questionnaire (DSQ-40). We conducted comparisons and cor- Keywords: relations and a regression analysis. Personality disorders Results: The results showed expressive differences (d>1.0) between mature, neurotic and Defence mechanisms immature defence mechanism groups, and it was observed that pathological personality Self-assessment traits are more typical in people who use less mature defence mechanisms (i.e., neurotic and immature), which comprises marked personality profiles for each group, according to the IDCP. We also found correlations between some of the 40 specific mechanisms of the DSQ-40 and the 12 dimensions of pathological personality traits from the IDCP (r ≥ 0.30 to r ≤ 0.43), partially supported by the literature. In addition, we used regression analysis to verify the potential of the IDCP dimension clusters (related to personality disorders) to predict defence mechanisms, revealing some minimally expressive predictive values (between 20% and 35%). Discussion: The results indicate that those who tend to use immature defence mechanisms are also those most likely to present pathological personality traits.
    [Show full text]
  • Defense Mechanisms.Pdf
    Defense Mechanisms According to Sigmund Freud, who originated the Defense Mechanism theory, Defense Mechanisms occur when our ego cannot meet the demands of reality. They are psychological strategies brought into play by the unconscious mind to manipulate, deny or distort reality so as to maintain a socially acceptable self-image. Healthy people normally use these mechanisms throughout life. it becomes pathological only when its persistent use leads to maladaptive behavior such that the physical and/or mental health of the individual is adversely affected. The purpose of ego defense mechanisms is to protect the mind/self/ego from anxiety and/or social sanctions and/or to provide a refuge from a situation with which one cannot currently cope. Defense mechanisms are unconscious coping mechanisms that reduce anxiety generated by threats from unacceptable impulses In 1977, psychologist George Vaillant took Freud’s theory and built upon it by categorizing them, placing Freud’s mechanisms on a continuum related to their psychoanalytical developmental level. Level 1: Pathological Defenses The mechanisms on this level, when predominating, almost always are severely pathological. These six defense’s, in conjunction, permit one to effectively rearrange external experiences to eliminate the need to cope with reality. The pathological users of these mechanisms frequently appear irrational or insane to others. These are the "psychotic" defense’s, common in overt psychosis. However, they are found in dreams and throughout childhood as well. They include: Delusional Projection: Delusions about external reality, usually of a persecutory nature. Conversion: the expression of an intra-psychic conflict as a physical symptom; some examples include blindness, deafness, paralysis, or numbness.
    [Show full text]
  • The Self of the Field and the Work of Donnel Stern a Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of Antioch University Seattle By
    The Self of the Field and the Work of Donnel Stern A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of Antioch University Seattle By Daniel Masler June 2014 The Self of the Field and the Work of Donnel Stern This dissertation, by Daniel Masler, has been approved by the Committee Members signed below who recommend that it be accepted by the faculty of the Antioch University Seattle, at Seattle, WA in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PSYCHOLOGY Dissertation Committee: ________________________ Philip Cushman, Ph.D. Chairperson ________________________ Mary Wieneke, Ph.D. ________________________ William J. Coburn, Ph.D. ________________________ June 9, 2014 ii © Copyright by Daniel Masler, 2014 All Rights Reserved iii Abstract The Self of the Field and the Work of Donnel Stern Daniel Masler Antioch University Seattle Seattle, WA No study has taken an updated and comprehensive review of Donnel Stern’s writings. An investigation of his philosophical assumptions, locating Stern’s work socioculturally and historically, along with an elucidation of Stern’s background in traditional psychoanalytic literature and clinical practice, brings out the meanings and enigmas present in his theories of dissociation, enactment, unformulated experience, multiple self-states, and reflection. Stern has offered one of the best-integrated theoretical models in relational psychoanalytic theory. An examination of his theories within the theoretical traditions to which he makes claim (psychoanalytic, interpersonal, hermeneutic, postmodern,
    [Show full text]
  • Psychodynamic Theory
    184 Psychodynamic Theory Kathleen Holtz Deal Abstract: Psychodynamic theory, a theory of personality originated by Sigmund Freud, has a long and complex history within social work and continues to be uti- lized by social workers. This article traces the theory’s development and explains key concepts with an emphasis on its current relational focus within object relations theory and self-psychology. Empirical support for theoretical concepts and the effec- tiveness of psychodynamic therapies is reviewed and critiqued. Future directions are discussed, including addressing cultural considerations, increasing research, and emphasizing a relational paradigm Keywords: Psychodynamic theory; empirical support; social work practice HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENTS Psychodynamic theory, a theory of personality originated by Sigmund Freud, has a long and complex history within social work. The young profession’s desire for a sci- entific base, Mary Richmond’s choice of a medical model to assess and treat client problems, and the wide impact of Freud’s ideas on the popular culture, contributed to the prominent role of psychodynamic thought in the theory base of social work (Germain, 1970; Greene & Ephross, 1991). In addition, the movement of large num- bers of social workers into areas of practice heavily influenced by psychiatrists, including child guidance and work with war veterans and their families, exposed them to psychodynamic ideas (Brandell, 2004; Goldstein, 1995). The diagnostic or psychosocial school developed by such early contributors as Mary Richmond, Charlotte Towle, Gordon Hamilton, and Florence Hollis, used psychodynamic con- cepts to help explain complex human behaviors. These writers attempted to inte- grate concepts, such as the role of drives in human motivation, stages of psycho- sexual development, and ego defense mechanisms into a person-and-environment framework to explain the interaction of interpersonal and societal factors.
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Destruction and Countertransference Reactions in Adolescent Psychotherapy: a Psychoanalytic Case Report
    Journal of Psychology & Clinical Psychiatry Self-Destruction and Countertransference Reactions in Adolescent Psychotherapy: A Psychoanalytic Case Report Abstract Case Report Self-destruction behaviors in adolescents constitute a serious mental health problem. Several psychoanalysts and psychodynamic theorists have long attempted Volume 1 Issue 3 - 2014 to understand the desire of self-destruction. Suicidal adolescents often elicit strong George Giannakopoulos*, Kalliopi Triantafyllou and Stylianos countertransference reactions from therapists. These reactions fluctuate from the Christogiorgos throughbelief that of therepresentations therapist should and beemotions the perfect produced object by that the will patient relieve in the sufferinganalyst’s mindteenager facilitates to the openlyfurther hostile understanding stance by theof transferencetherapist. The phenomena. awareness andThe working- present Department of Child Psychiatry, University of Athens Medical School, Greece psychoanalytic case report of a suicidal adolescent tries to illustrate some aspects of *Corresponding author: to the diagnostic access and the treatment of adolescents after a suicide attempt. Department of Child Psychiatry, University of Athens these complex reactions. The psychodynamic approaches can contribute significantly Medical School, Aghia Sophia Children’sGeorge Giannakopoulos, Hospital, Keywords Thivon and Papadiamantopoulou 11527 Athens, Greece, Tel: 0030210747381; Fax: 0030210747381; Email: Adolescence; Countertransference; Psychoanalytic psychotherapy; Suicide attempt [email protected]: June 23, 2014 | Published: July 11, 2014 Introduction Self-destruction behaviors in adolescents constitute a serious mental health problem, with approximately 80% of suicidal when the ego is in so really great danger that it feels unable to thoughts and attempts present in adolescents struggling with a overcomerescue function alone, that it sees before itself was as fulfilleddeserted by by the all mother. protective However, forces psychiatric disorder [1,2].
    [Show full text]
  • Defense Mechanisms
    CLINICAL EDUCATION AND INTERVENTIONS FOR DEFENSE STRUCTURES OF CO-OCCURRING POPULATIONS Brian G. Lengfelder LCPC, CAADC, CCJP, SAP, MAC, CSAT, CMAT, ACRPS WHAT CONSTITUTES DEFENSE MECHANISMS • The term ‘defense mechanisms’ was coined over 100 years ago to describe a construct of psychological mechanisms for coping with intrapsychic conflicts. • Defense mechanisms and conflicts are two hypothetical constructs that have remained at the core of psychodynamic approaches to understanding and treating clinical psychopathology. • Defense mechanisms mediate between an individual’s wishes, needs, and affects on the one hand, and both internalized object relations and external reality on the other. Freud, S. The neuro-psychosis of defense, in Strachey, J. (ed.): The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, London, Hogarth, (original work published 1894), 1962, pp. 43-68. DEFENSE MECHANISMS DEFINED • Mechanisms that mediate the individual’s reaction to emotional conflicts and to external stressors. Some defense mechanisms (e.g., projection, splitting, acting out) are almost invariably maladaptive. Others (e.g., suppression, denial) may be either maladaptive or adaptive, depending on their severity, their inflexibility, and the context in which they occur. 2013, DSM-5 American Psychiatric Association DEFENSE MECHANISMS DEFINED • Defense mechanisms (or coping styles) are automatic psychological processes that protect the individual against anxiety and from the awareness of internal or external dangers or stressors. Individuals
    [Show full text]
  • The Invisible Revealed: Collusion As an Entry to the Group Unconscious
    The Invisible Revealed: Collusion as an Entry to the Group Unconscious Gianpiero Petriglieri and Jack Denfeld Wood Abstract earlier experience and all-too-familiar “dys- In group consultation, as in therapy, a functional” patterns of behavior. Whichever shared awareness of projective processes is our formal role in a group—as consultant or helpful to both consultant and client. If left member—we inevitably experience the constel- unaware, the flow of material can submerge lation of our unconscious complexes. All of us both. The consultant risks colluding with the can get “hooked” and “lose it” and regress to group by adopting their projections and then previous behaviors. We subsequently feel em- either withdrawing or acting out. When such barrassed or guilty and berate ourselves that we situations are “exposed,” they are usually “should have known” or “should have managed considered to be either professional embar- better” or “should have kept things under con- rassments or evidence of professional incom- trol.” petence. Yet careful investigation of the ex- Behavioral professionals are constantly perience of collusion can lead to a deeper warned by their teachers, supervisors, and col- understanding of the covert and unconscious leagues about the risk of losing their “objec- elements of working with a group. tive” and “unbiased” perspective—of “going ______ native,” of having their “buttons pushed” and being “hooked” into their clients’ games, of Had we been a bit braver, we would have “falling out of role,” and so on. If this is a risk titled this article “The Importance of Collusion: when working with an individual client, it is Working with the Impulse to Withdraw and Act even more of a risk when working with a Out in Group Consultation.” Our aim is to ex- group, the gravity of whose psychological pull plore how consultants who find themselves col- is considerably stronger and much more multi- luding with their groups—and deploying de- dimensional.
    [Show full text]