DOCSLIB.ORG

Resource and Output Trends in the United States Since 1870

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Resource and Output Trends in the United States Since 1870 This PDF is a selection from an out-of-print volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: Resource and Output Trends in the United States Since 1870 Volume Author/Editor: Moses Abramovitz Volume Publisher: NBER Volume ISBN: 0-87014-366-2 Volume URL: http://www.nber.org/books/abra56-1 Publication Date: 1956 Chapter Title: Resource and Output Trends in the United States Since 1870 Chapter Author: Moses Abramovitz Chapter URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c5650 Chapter pages in book: (p. 1 - 23) Resource and Output Trends in the United States since 1870 MOSES ABRAMOVITZ OCCASIONAL PAPER 52 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH, INC. 1956 Reprinted from the American Economic Review Library of Congress catalog card number: 56-9226. PRICE $.50 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1956 OFFICERS Harry Scherman, Chairman Gottfried Haberler, President George B. Roberts, Vice-President and Treasurer W. J. Carson, Executive Director DIRECTORS AT LARGE Wallace J. Campbell, Director, Cooperative League of the USA Solomon Fabricant, New York University Albert J. Hettinger, Jr., Lazard Frères and Company Oswald W. Xnauth, Beauf ort, South Carolina H. W. Laidler, Executive Director, League for Industrial Democracy Shepard Morgan, Norfolk, Connecticut George B. Roberts, Vice-President, The First National City Bank of New York Beardsley Rumi, New York City Harry Scherman, Chairman, Book-of-the-Month Club George Soule, Bennington College N. I. Stone, Consulting Economist J. Raymond Walsh, New York City Joseph H. Willits, Director, Educational ,Survey, University of Pennsylvania Leo Wolman, Columbia University Donald B. Woodward, Vick Chemical Company Theodore 0. Yntema, Vice-Presidenl--.-Finance, Ford Motor Company DIRECTORS BY UNIVERSITY APPOINTMENT E. Wight Bakke, Yale Gottfried Haberler, Harvard Arthur F. Burns, Columbia Clarence fleer, North Carolina Melvin G. de Chazeau, Cornell R. L. Kozelka, Minnesota G. A. Elliott, Toronto C. Arthur Kuip, Pennsylvania Frank W. Fetter, Northwestern T. W. Schultz, Chicago H. M. Groves, Wiscon.sin Jacob Viner, Princeton DIRECTORS APPOINTED BY OTHER ORGANIZATIONS Percival F. Brundage, American of Accountants Harold G. Haicrow, American Farm Economic Association S. H. Ruttenberg, Congress of Industrial Organizations Murray Shields, American Management Association Boris Shishkin, American Federation of Labor W. Allen Wallis, American Statistical Association John H. Williams, American Economic Association Harold F. Williamson, Economic History Association RESEARCH STAFF Solomon Fabricant, Director of Research Geoffrey H. Moore, Associate Director of Research Moses Abramovitz John W. Kendrick Morris A. Copeland Simon Kuznets David Durand Clarence D. Long Milton Friedman Ruth P. Mack Raymond W. Goldsmith use Mintz Millard Hastay G. Warren Nutter W. Braddock Hickman Lawrence H. Seltzer Daniel M. Holland George J. Stigler Thor Hultgren Leo Wolman Herbert B. Woolley RELATION OF THE DIRECTORS TO THE WORK AND PUBLICATiONS OF THE NATIONAL BUREAU OF RESEARCH 1. The object of the National Bureau of Economic Research is to ascertain and to present to the public important economic facts and their interpretation in a scientific and impartial manner. The Board of Directors is charged with the responsibility of ensuring that the work of the National Bureau is carried on in strict conformity with this object. 2. To this end the Board of Directors shall appoint one or more Directors of Research. 3. The Director or Directors of Research shall submit to the members of the Board, or to its Executive Committee, for their formal adoption, all specific pro- posals concerning researches to be instituted. 4. No report shall be published until the Director or Directors of Research shall have submitted to the Board a summary drawing attention to the character of the data and their utilization in the report, the nature and treatment of the prob- lems involved, the main conclusions and such other information as in their opinion would serve to determine the suitability of the report for publication, in accord- ance with the principles of the National Bureau. 5. A copy of any manuscript proposed for publication shall also be submitted to each member of the Board. For each manuscript to be so submitted a special committee shall be appointed by the President, or at his designation by the Ex- ecutive Director, consisting of three Directors selected as nearly as may be one from each general division of the Board. The names of the special manuscript committee shall be stated to each Director when the summary and report de- scribed in paragraph (4) are sent to him. It shall be the duty of each member of the committee to read the manuscript. If each member of the special committee signifies his approval within thirty days, the manuscript may be published. If each member of the special committee has not signified his approval within thirty days of the transmittal of the report and manuscript, the Director of Research shall then notify each member of the Board, requesting approval or disapproval of publication, and thirty additional days shall be granted for this purpose. The manuscript shall then not be published unless at least a majority of the entire Board and a two-thirds majority of those members of the Board who shall have voted on the proposal within the time fixed for the receipt of votes on the publica- tion proposed shall have approved. 6. No manuscrip(; may be published, though approved by each member of the special committee, until forty-five days have elapsed from the transmittal of the summary and report. The interval is allowed for the receipt of any memorandum of dissent or reservation, together with a brief statement of his reasons, that any member may wish to express; and such memorandum of dissent or reservation shall be published with the manuscript if he so desires. Publication does not, however, imply that each member of the Board has read the manuscript, or that either members of the Board in general, or of the special committee, have passed upon its validity in every detail. 7. A copy of this resolution shall, unless otherwise determined by the Board, be printed in each copy of every National Bureau book. (Resolution adopted October 25, 1926 and revised February 6, 1933 and February 24, 1941) RESOURCE AND OUTPUT TRENDS IN THE UNITED STATES SINCE 1870* By MOSES ABRAMOVITZ Stanford University I. Introduction This paper is a very brief treatment of three questions relating to the history of our economic growth since the Civil War: (1) How large has been the net increase of aggregate output per capita, and to what extent has this increase been obtained as a result of greater labor or capital input on the one hand and of a rise in productivity on the other? (2) Is there evidence of retardation, or conceivably acceleration, in the growth of per capita output? (3) Have there been fluctuations in the rate of growth of output, apart from the short-term fluctuations of business cycles, and, if so, what is the significance of these swings? The answers to these three questions, to the extent that they can be given, represent, of course, only a tiny fraction of the historical ex- perience relevant to the problems of growth. Even so, anyone ac- quainted with their complexity will realize that no one of them, much less all three, can be treated satisfactorily in a short space. I shall have to pronounce upon them somewhat arbitrarily. My ability to deal with them at all is a reflection of one of the more important, though one of the less obvious, of the many aspects of our growing wealth; namely, the accumulation of historical statistics in this country during the last generation. For the most part, the figures which I present or which underlie my qualitative statements are taken directly from tables of estimates of national product, labor force, productivity, and the like compiled by others. In a few cases I have ventured to compute ratios or extend the tables forward or backward by combining estimates. But no original estimates depending on the compilation or reworking of primary data are included. *should like to thank Professor Simon Kuznets and Mr. J. W. Kendrick who made available to me certain unpublished estimates of national product, productivity, capita) stock, and hours of work. Their contributions are further described in the notes to Table 1.I am grateful to Richard A. Easterlin, Solomon Fabricant, J. W. Kendrick, and G. H. Moore for their critical review of the manuscript and to Mrs. Charlotte Boschan for assisting in its preparation. This paper has been approved for publication as a report of the National Bureau of Eco- nomic Research by the Director of Research and the Board of Directors of the National Bureau, in accordance with the resolution of the Board governing National Bureau reports (see the 35th Annual Report of the National Bureau of Economic Research, May, 1955). It is to be reprinted as No. 32 in the National Bureau's series of "Occasional Papers." 5 6 AMERICAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION The period since 1870 has an important unifying characteristic in that throughout these eighty years the economy has been growing in response to the complex of cumulative forces which we generally call industrialization. It is quite clear, however, that 1870 was not the be- ginning of the process of industrialization in this country. The propor- tion of gainful workers in agriculture fell from 71 per cent in 1820 to 64 per cent in 1850. It fell another 10 percentage points by 1870. Steam transport by water and rail was already common when the period begins. The proportion of the gainfully employed engaged in manufacturing and construction rose from 12 to 21 per cent between 1820 and 1870. Real per capita output rose significantly during the 1850's. It was set back by the Civil War, but aggregate output well- nigh doubled from 1850 to 1870.' The data before 1870—and still more before 1850—are highly dubious, but it seems clear that the period since 1870 does not include the entire era of industrialization and rapid income rise in this country.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Edward S. Shaw* Simon Kuznets Remarked in His Capital in The
    Edward S. Shaw* Simon Kuznets remarked in his Capital in rate. There is physical wealth, its ownership The American Economy, " ... extrapolation of represented by an homogeneous financial asset inflationary pressures over the next thirty in the form of common stock or "equity," and years raises a specter of intolerable conse­ there is wealth in the form of real money bal­ quences.... "1 Fifteen of the thirty years are ances. Accumulation of physical and monetary over, and inflation has accelerated. The central wealth derives from a constant rate of saving concern of this paper is whether Kuznets' pre­ for the community. Inflation occurs because the diction of "intolerable consequences" for capital growth rate of nominal money exceeds the markets and capital accumulation is on track or growth rate of real money demanded. patently wrong. 2 The inflation is immaculate because its pace Monetary theory distinguishes between "im­ is constant and perfectly foreseen and because maculate" inflation, "clean" inflation, and the inflation tax on real money balances is com­ "dirty" inflation. It is the last of these that pensated precisely by a deposit-rate of interest Kuznets dreaded and that we have endured. The on money. It is fully anticipated, and it does not first section below deals very briefly with dif­ impose a relative penalty on the money form of ferences between the three styles of inflation. wealth. Money-wage rates rise faster than out­ The second section is a catalogue of ways in put prices in the degree that labor productivity which dirty inflation may obstruct and distort is growing.
    [Show full text]
  • Trends in Factor Shares: Facts and Implications
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Karabarbounis, Loukas; Neiman, Brent Article Trends in factor shares: Facts and implications NBER Reporter Provided in Cooperation with: National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge, Mass. Suggested Citation: Karabarbounis, Loukas; Neiman, Brent (2017) : Trends in factor shares: Facts and implications, NBER Reporter, National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge, MA, Iss. 4, pp. 19-22 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/178760 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu systematically benefit firstborns and help 2 S. Black, P. Devereux, and K. Adolescent Behavior,” Economic Inquiry, Trends in Factor Shares: Facts and Implications explain their generally better outcomes.
    [Show full text]
  • Econometrics As a Pluralistic Scientific Tool for Economic Planning: on Lawrence R
    Econometrics as a Pluralistic Scientific Tool for Economic Planning: On Lawrence R. Klein’s Econometrics Erich Pinzón-Fuchs To cite this version: Erich Pinzón-Fuchs. Econometrics as a Pluralistic Scientific Tool for Economic Planning: On Lawrence R. Klein’s Econometrics. 2016. halshs-01364809 HAL Id: halshs-01364809 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01364809 Preprint submitted on 12 Sep 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Documents de Travail du Centre d’Economie de la Sorbonne Econometrics as a Pluralistic Scientific Tool for Economic Planning: On Lawrence R. Klein’s Econometrics Erich PINZÓN FUCHS 2014.80 Maison des Sciences Économiques, 106-112 boulevard de L'Hôpital, 75647 Paris Cedex 13 http://centredeconomiesorbonne.univ-paris1.fr/ ISSN : 1955-611X Econometrics as a Pluralistic Scientific Tool for Economic Planning: On Lawrence R. Klein’s Econometrics Erich Pinzón Fuchs† October 2014 Abstract Lawrence R. Klein (1920-2013) played a major role in the construction and in the further dissemination of econometrics from the 1940s. Considered as one of the main developers and practitioners of macroeconometrics, Klein’s influence is reflected in his application of econometric modelling “to the analysis of economic fluctuations and economic policies” for which he was awarded the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel in 1980.
    [Show full text]
  • Off to a Good Start: the Nber and the Measurement of National Income
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES OFF TO A GOOD START: THE NBER AND THE MEASUREMENT OF NATIONAL INCOME Hugh Rockoff Working Paper 26895 http://www.nber.org/papers/w26895 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 March 2020 Many thanks are due to Katharine Abraham who discussed a previous draft when it was presented at the 2020 annual meeting of the American Economic Association in a session celebrating the 100th anniversary of the Bureau, and to Claudia Goldin for many helpful comments. The remaining errors are mine. The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer-reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2020 by Hugh Rockoff. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Off to a Good Start: The NBER and the Measurement of National Income Hugh Rockoff NBER Working Paper No. 26895 March 2020 JEL No. B0,N12 ABSTRACT The creation of the National Bureau of Economic Research was a response to the bitter controversies over the distribution of income that roiled the United States during the Progressive Era. Thanks to Malcolm Rorty, a business economist, and Nahum I. Stone, an independent socialist economist, a “Committee on the Distribution of Income” was created; what might be considered the first name of the Bureau.
    [Show full text]
  • Speech--Chairman Ben S. Bernanke
    For release on delivery 9:30 a.m. EDT May 8, 2010 Commencement Address: The Economics of Happiness Remarks by Ben S. Bernanke Chairman Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System at the University of South Carolina Columbia, South Carolina May 8, 2010 I want to begin by thanking the Board of Trustees of the University of South Carolina, President Pastides, and this year’s graduates for the great honor of addressing this commencement ceremony. Although I was born just across the border in Augusta, Georgia, I considered South Carolina my home from early childhood until I married and took my first academic job after graduate school. During most of that time, my family lived in Dillon, a couple of hours’ drive from here. I have had several occasions to visit Dillon and other places in the Carolinas since I got into government work, and I am both amazed and proud about the remarkable economic and social progress that has occurred since I grew up here. South Carolina, like America, is always reinventing itself, despite new and, it sometimes seems, ever more difficult challenges. I always find it difficult to choose a topic for a commencement talk. I am an economist, but my experience has been that people in a celebratory frame of mind are usually not that interested in an economics lecture. (I can’t quite understand why not.) Instead, they are generally looking for something more personal and inspirational. So I thought I would split the difference between an economics lecture and inspirational remarks and speak briefly about what economics and social science more generally have to say about personal happiness, and what those ideas imply both for economic policymaking and the choices each of you will make as you leave college for other pursuits.
    [Show full text]
  • ΒΙΒΛΙΟΓ ΡΑΦΙΑ Bibliography
    Τεύχος 53, Οκτώβριος-Δεκέμβριος 2019 | Issue 53, October-December 2019 ΒΙΒΛΙΟΓ ΡΑΦΙΑ Bibliography Βραβείο Νόμπελ στην Οικονομική Επιστήμη Nobel Prize in Economics Τα τεύχη δημοσιεύονται στον ιστοχώρο της All issues are published online at the Bank’s website Τράπεζας: address: https://www.bankofgreece.gr/trapeza/kepoe https://www.bankofgreece.gr/en/the- t/h-vivliothhkh-ths-tte/e-ekdoseis-kai- bank/culture/library/e-publications-and- anakoinwseis announcements Τράπεζα της Ελλάδος. Κέντρο Πολιτισμού, Bank of Greece. Centre for Culture, Research and Έρευνας και Τεκμηρίωσης, Τμήμα Documentation, Library Section Βιβλιοθήκης Ελ. Βενιζέλου 21, 102 50 Αθήνα, 21 El. Venizelos Ave., 102 50 Athens, [email protected] Τηλ. 210-3202446, [email protected], Tel. +30-210-3202446, 3202396, 3203129 3202396, 3203129 Βιβλιογραφία, τεύχος 53, Οκτ.-Δεκ. 2019, Bibliography, issue 53, Oct.-Dec. 2019, Nobel Prize Βραβείο Νόμπελ στην Οικονομική Επιστήμη in Economics Συντελεστές: Α. Ναδάλη, Ε. Σεμερτζάκη, Γ. Contributors: A. Nadali, E. Semertzaki, G. Tsouri Τσούρη Βιβλιογραφία, αρ.53 (Οκτ.-Δεκ. 2019), Βραβείο Nobel στην Οικονομική Επιστήμη 1 Bibliography, no. 53, (Oct.-Dec. 2019), Nobel Prize in Economics Πίνακας περιεχομένων Εισαγωγή / Introduction 6 2019: Abhijit Banerjee, Esther Duflo and Michael Kremer 7 Μονογραφίες / Monographs ................................................................................................... 7 Δοκίμια Εργασίας / Working papers ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Simon Kuznets [Ideological Profiles of the Economics Laureates] Daniel B
    Simon Kuznets [Ideological Profiles of the Economics Laureates] Daniel B. Klein, Ryan Daza, and Hannah Mead Econ Journal Watch 10(3), September 2013: 411-413 Abstract Simon Kuznets is among the 71 individuals who were awarded the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel between 1969 and 2012. This ideological profile is part of the project called “The Ideological Migration of the Economics Laureates,” which fills the September 2013 issue of Econ Journal Watch. Keywords Classical liberalism, economists, Nobel Prize in economics, ideology, ideological migration, intellectual biography. JEL classification A11, A13, B2, B3 Link to this document http://econjwatch.org/file_download/738/KuznetsIPEL.pdf IDEOLOGICAL PROFILES OF THE ECONOMICS LAUREATES Simon Kuznets by Daniel B. Klein, Ryan Daza, and Hannah Mead Simon Kuznets (1901–1985) was born in Russia. In 1922, Kuznets emigrated with his family to the United States. He earned his Ph.D. from Columbia University in 1926 and started working at the National Bureau of Economic Research the following year. Between 1930 and 1971, Kuznets taught at the University of Pennsylvania, Johns Hopkins University, and then Harvard University (Kuznets 1992a/1971). His ideological views do not seem to have changed significantly during his adult life. Kuznets won the Nobel Prize in Economic Science for “for his empirically founded interpretation of economic growth which has led to new and deepened insight into the economic and social structure and process of development.” In a speech at the award ceremony, Bertil Ohlin praised Kuznets for having “consistently addressed himself to giving quantitative precision to economic magnitudes which seem [to] be relevant to an understanding of processes of social change.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Depression As a Historical Problem
    Upjohn Institute Press The Great Depression as a Historical Problem Michael A. Bernstein University of California, San Diego Chapter 3 (pp. 63-94) in: The Economics of the Great Depression Mark Wheeler, ed. Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, 1998 DOI: 10.17848/9780585322049.ch3 Copyright ©1998. W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research. All rights reserved. 3 The Great Depression as a Historical Problem Michael A. Bernstein University of California, San Diego It is now over a half-century since the Great Depression of the 1930s, the most severe and protracted economic crisis in American his tory. To this day, there exists no general agreement about its causes, although there tends to be a consensus about its consequences. Those who at the time argued that the Depression was symptomatic of a pro found weakness in the mechanisms of capitalism were only briefly heard. After World War II, their views appeared hysterical and exag gerated, as the industrialized nations (the United States most prominent among them) sustained dramatic rates of growth and as the economics profession became increasingly preoccupied with the development of Keynesian theory and the management of the mixed economy. As a consequence, the economic slump of the inter-war period came to be viewed as a policy problem rather than as an outgrowth of fundamental tendencies in capitalist development. Within that new context, a debate persisted for a few years, but it too eventually subsided. The presump tion was that the Great Depression could never be repeated owing to the increasing sophistication of economic analysis and policy formula tion.
    [Show full text]
  • Front Matter In" Wesley Clair Mitchell: the Economic Scientist"
    This PDF is a selection from an out-of-print volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: Wesley Clair Mitchell: The Economic Scientist Volume Author/Editor: Arthur F. Burns, ed. Volume Publisher: NBER Volume ISBN: 0-87014-052-3 Volume URL: http://www.nber.org/books/burn52-1 Publication Date: 1952 Chapter Title: Front matter in "Wesley Clair Mitchell: The Economic Scientist" Chapter Author: Arthur F. Burns Chapter URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c3093 Chapter pages in book: (p. -14 - 0) We Clair Mitchell The Economic'Scientist.' Edited by ARTHUR F. BURNS NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH, INC. NEW YORK 1952 S Copyright,1952, by Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. 1819 Broadway, New York 23 All Rights Reserved Typography by Oscar Leventhal, Inc. Presswork and binding by H. Wolff Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 52-6013 PUBLICATIONS OF THE NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH, INC. NUMBER 53 WESLEY CLAIR MITCHELL THE ECONOMIC SCIENTIST '•1 OFFICERS 1952 Harry Scherman, Chairman C. C. Balderston, President Percival F. Brundage, Vice-President George B. Roberts, Treasurer W. J. Carson, Executive Director DIRECTORS AT LARGE Donald R. Beicher, American Telephone and Telegraph Company Oswald W. Knauth, Beau fort, South Carolina Simon Kuznets, University of Pennsylvania H. W. Laidler, Executive Director, League for Industrial Democracy Shepard Morgan, New York City C. Reinold Noyes, Princeton, New Jersey George B. Roberts, Vice-President, National City Bank Beardsley Rumi, New York City Harry Scherman, Chairman, Book-of-the-Month Club George Soule, Bennington College N. I. Stone, Consulting Economist J. Raymond Walsh, New York City Leo Wolman, Columbia University Theodore 0.
    [Show full text]
  • Income Inequality Revisited 60 Years Later: Piketty Vs Kuznets ✩ Ivan Lyubimov
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Russian Journal of Economics 3 (2017) 42–53 www.rujec.org Income inequality revisited 60 years later: Piketty vs Kuznets ✩ Ivan Lyubimov Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow, Russia Abstract This paper compares two popular views on the evolution of income inequality. The article by Simon Kuznets, which was published in American Economic Review in 1955, considers inequality as a byproduct of economic growth and suggests that a rela- tively rich economy should also be less unequal. In contrast, Thomas Piketty indicates that inequality is progressing, and an internationally coordinated policy is required to bring inequality under control. My paper applies the arguments of Kuznets and Piketty to the problem of income inequality in modern Russia. © 2017 Non-profit partnership “Voprosy Ekonomiki”. Hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. JEL classification:D63, I24, O47. Keywords: income inequality, economic growth, labor income, economic rents, CEOs. 1. Introduction The study of the evolution of income and capital inequality is important not only because of the need to control poverty but also due to the potential influence inequality has on economic growth rates. Economists have long believed that economic growth alone would suffice to resolve the problems of inequality and poverty. For example, Simon Kuznets (1955) assumed that sustainable economic growth would ultimately lead to a lower level of inequality. Similar concepts regarding the correlation between in- equality and economic growth have dominated international financial institutions for a long time, including the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. ✩ The updated English version of the article published in Russian in Ekonomicheskaya Politika, 2016, No.
    [Show full text]
  • Simon Kuznets and the Empirical Tradition in Economics
    This PDF is a selection from a published volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: Political Arithmetic: Simon Kuznets and the Empirical Tradition in Economics Volume Author/Editor: Robert William Fogel, Enid M. Fogel, Mark Guglielmo, and Nathaniel Grotte Volume Publisher: University of Chicago Press Volume ISBN: 0-226-25661-8, 978-0-226-25661-0 (cloth) Volume URL: http://www.nber.org/books/foge12-1 Conference Date: n/a Publication Date: March 2013 Chapter Title: The Emergence of National Income Accounting as a Tool of Economic Policy Chapter Author(s): Robert William Fogel, Enid M. Fogel, Mark Guglielmo, Nathaniel Grotte Chapter URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c12915 Chapter pages in book: (p. 49 - 64) 3 :: The Emergence of National Income Accounting as a Tool of Economic Policy Herbert Hoover was sworn in as president at the end of a decade of generally vigorous economic growth, marred by the deep but short recession of 1920–21. By March 1929, the economy was near the top of a vigorous boom. In his inaugural address, Hoover was lyrical in his vision of American prosperity: “Ours is a land rich in resources; stimulating in its glorious beauty; fi lled with millions of happy homes; blessed with comforts and opportunity. In no nation are the institu- tions of progress more advanced. In no nation are the fruits of accom- plishment more secure. In no nation is the government more worthy of respect. No country is more loved by its people. I have an abiding faith in their capacity, integrity, and high purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Nobel Prize in Economics Turns 50 Allen R. Sanderson1 and John
    The Nobel Prize in Economics Turns 50 Allen R. Sanderson1 and John J. Siegfried2 Abstract The first Sveriges Riksbank Prizes in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel, were awarded in 1969, 50 years ago. In this essay we provide the historical origins of this sixth “Nobel” field, background information on the recipients, their nationalities, educational backgrounds, institutional affiliations, and collaborations with their esteemed colleagues. We describe the contributions of a sample of laureates to economics and the social and political world around them. We also address – and speculate – on both some of their could-have-been contemporaries who were not chosen, as well as directions the field of economics and its practitioners are possibly headed in the years ahead, and thus where future laureates may be found. JEL Codes: A1, B3 1 University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA 2Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA Corresponding Author: Allen Sanderson, Department of Economics, University of Chicago, 1126 East 59th Street, Chicago, IL 60637, USA Email: [email protected] 1 Introduction: The 1895 will of Swedish scientist Alfred Nobel specified that his estate be used to create annual awards in five categories – physics, chemistry, physiology or medicine, literature, and peace – to recognize individuals whose contributions have conferred “the greatest benefit on mankind.” Nobel Prizes in these five fields were first awarded in 1901.1 In 1968, Sweden’s central bank, to celebrate its 300th anniversary and also to champion its independence from the Swedish government and tout the scientific nature of its work, made a donation to the Nobel Foundation to establish a sixth Prize, the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel.2 The first “economics Nobel” Prizes, selected by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences were awarded in 1969 (to Ragnar Frisch and Jan Tinbergen, from Norway and the Netherlands, respectively).
    [Show full text]