International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Food Sciences JAEFS E-ISSN : 2618-5946 DOI: 10.31015/Jaefs.2020.4.15
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Assessment of Forest Pests and Diseases in Protected Areas of Georgia Final Report
Assessment of Forest Pests and Diseases in Protected Areas of Georgia Final report Dr. Iryna Matsiakh Tbilisi 2014 This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The content, findings, interpretations, and conclusions of this publication are the sole responsibility of the FLEG II (ENPI East) Programme Team (www.enpi-fleg.org) and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the Implementing Organizations. CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES ............................................................................................................................. 3 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ...................................................................................................................... 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................................. 7 Background information ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Literature review ...................................................................................................................................................... 7 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................................. 8 Results and Discussion .......................................................................................................................................... -
Амурский Зоологический Журнал II(3), 2010. 191-244 УДК 595.768.2 © Amurian Zoological Journal II(3), 2010
© Амурский зоологический журнал II(3), 2010. 191-244 УДК 595.768.2 © Amurian zoological journal II(3), 2010. 191-244 ANNOTATED CATALOGUE OF CURCULIONID-BEETLES (COLEOPTERA: ANTHRIBIDAE, RHYNCHITIDAE, ATTELABIDAE, BRENTIDAE, BRACHYCERIDAE, DRYOPHTHORIDAE AND CURCULIONIDAE) OF IRAN A.A. Legalov1, H. Ghahari2, Yu.G. Arzanov3 [Легалов А.А., Гхари Г., Арзанов Ю.Г. Аннотированный каталог жуков надсемейства Curculionoidea (Coleoptera: Anthribidae, Rhynchitidae, Attelabidae, Brentidae, Brachyceridae, Dryophthoridae and Curculionidae) Ирана] 1Institute of Animal Systematics and Ecology, Siberian Zoological Museum, Frunze street, 11, 630091, Novosibirsk, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] 1Институт систематики и экологии животных СО РАН, Сибирский зоологический музей, Фрунзе, 11, 630091, Новосибирск, Россия. E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Agriculture, Islamic Azad University, Shahre Rey Branch, Tehran, Iran. E-mail: [email protected] 2Отдел сельского хозяйства, Исламский университет Азад, отделение Шахр-рей, Тегеран, Иран. E-mail: [email protected] 3South Scientific Centre of RAS, Chekhov str., 41, 344006, Rostov-on-Don, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] 3Южный научный центр РАН, ул. Чехова, 41, 344006, Ростов-на-Дону, Россия. E-mail: [email protected] Key words: curculionid-beetles, Coleoptera, Curculionoidea, Iran, fauna Ключевые слова: долгоносикообразные жуки, Coleoptera, Curculionoidea, Иран, фауна Summary. Curculionid-beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionoidea) is the largest superfamily in Arthropoda with a number of important agricultural pests within the taxon. The fauna of Iranian Curculionoidea including the families Anthribidae (3 species), Rhynchitidae (15 species), Attelabidae (2 species), Brentidae (76 species), Brachyceridae (2 species), Dryophthoridae (8 species) and Curculionidae (651 species) is discussed in this paper. 757 species from 245 genera are listed with 61 new records for the fauna of Iran. -
Nematodes and Fungi) Against Curculio Nucum (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)
saqarTvelos mecnierebaTa erovnuli akademiis moambe, t. 15, #2, 2021 BULLETIN OF THE GEORGIAN NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, vol. 15, no. 2, 2021 Parasitology The Effectivenes of Entomopathogenic Microorganizsms (Nematodes and Fungi) Against Curculio nucum (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) Oleg Gorgadze*, Madona Kuchava*, Manana Lortkipanidze*, Nana Gratiashvili*, Medea Burjanadze** *Institute of Zoology, Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia **Vasil Gulisashvili Forest Institute, Agricultural University of Georgia, Tbilisi (Presented by Academy Member Irakli Eliava) The nut weevil (NW), Curculio nucum, is one of the main pests of hazelnuts which damages nut buds, leaves and especially fruits. Sometimes it destroys 80-90 percent of the crop. The study presents the results of using entomopathogenic microorganisms (nematodes and fungi) against NW. Local entomopathogenic nematodes (EPN) Steinernema borjomiense, S. thesami, Heterorhabditis sp. and Boverin's fungi were used against this pest. The tests were carried out in laboratory and field conditions. Nematodes of this species were first used against NW. The tests were carried out separately and together with different doses of nematode concentracions (100, 50 and 25 IJs/insect) and Boverin – (2 g/L and 4 g/L). Among the nematodes used separately against insect pests, S. borjomiense and Heterorhabditis sp. (in a dose of 100 IJs/insect) showed the greatest effect (100%). As for the separate application of Boverin, it turned out to be less effective (42.5% of adults and 43.2% of larvae died). On insect pests, a much greater effect was observed when using combined preparations of nematodes and fungi in laboratory and field trials. In the laboratory, after the use of combined preparations, 100% death of harmful insects is recorded. -
Integration of Entomopathogenic Fungi Into IPM Programs: Studies Involving Weevils (Coleoptera: Curculionoidea) Affecting Horticultural Crops
insects Review Integration of Entomopathogenic Fungi into IPM Programs: Studies Involving Weevils (Coleoptera: Curculionoidea) Affecting Horticultural Crops Kim Khuy Khun 1,2,* , Bree A. L. Wilson 2, Mark M. Stevens 3,4, Ruth K. Huwer 5 and Gavin J. Ash 2 1 Faculty of Agronomy, Royal University of Agriculture, P.O. Box 2696, Dangkor District, Phnom Penh, Cambodia 2 Centre for Crop Health, Institute for Life Sciences and the Environment, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland 4350, Australia; [email protected] (B.A.L.W.); [email protected] (G.J.A.) 3 NSW Department of Primary Industries, Yanco Agricultural Institute, Yanco, New South Wales 2703, Australia; [email protected] 4 Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation (NSW Department of Primary Industries and Charles Sturt University), Wagga Wagga, New South Wales 2650, Australia 5 NSW Department of Primary Industries, Wollongbar Primary Industries Institute, Wollongbar, New South Wales 2477, Australia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected]; Tel.: +61-46-9731208 Received: 7 September 2020; Accepted: 21 September 2020; Published: 25 September 2020 Simple Summary: Horticultural crops are vulnerable to attack by many different weevil species. Fungal entomopathogens provide an attractive alternative to synthetic insecticides for weevil control because they pose a lesser risk to human health and the environment. This review summarises the available data on the performance of these entomopathogens when used against weevils in horticultural crops. We integrate these data with information on weevil biology, grouping species based on how their developmental stages utilise habitats in or on their hostplants, or in the soil. -
An Inordinate Disdain for Beetles
An Inordinate Disdain for Beetles: Imagining the Insect in Colonial Aotearoa A Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Masters of Arts in English By Lillian Duval University of Canterbury August 2020 Table of Contents: TABLE OF CONTENTS: ................................................................................................................................. 2 TABLE OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................................... 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ................................................................................................................................ 6 ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................................. 7 INTRODUCTION: INSECTOCENTRISM..................................................................................................................................... 8 LANGUAGE ........................................................................................................................................................... 11 ALICE AND THE GNAT IN CONTEXT ............................................................................................................................ 17 FOCUS OF THIS RESEARCH ....................................................................................................................................... 20 CHAPTER ONE: FRONTIER ENTOMOLOGY AND THE -
New Genus of the Tribe Ceutorhynchini (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) from the Late Oligocene of Enspel, Southwestern Germany, With
Foss. Rec., 23, 197–204, 2020 https://doi.org/10.5194/fr-23-197-2020 © Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. New genus of the tribe Ceutorhynchini (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) from the late Oligocene of Enspel, southwestern Germany, with a remark on the role of weevils in the ancient food web Andrei A. Legalov1,2 and Markus J. Poschmann3 1Institute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Frunze Street, 11, Novosibirsk 630091, Russia 2Altai State University, Lenina 61, Barnaul 656049, Russia 3Generaldirektion Kulturelles Erbe RLP, Direktion Landesarchäologie/Erdgeschichte, Niederberger Höhe 1, 56077 Koblenz, Germany Correspondence: Andrei A. Legalov ([email protected]) Received: 10 September 2020 – Revised: 19 October 2020 – Accepted: 20 October 2020 – Published: 23 November 2020 Abstract. The new weevil genus Igneonasus gen. nov. (type and Rott) are situated in Germany (Legalov, 2015, 2020b). species: I. rudolphi sp. nov.) of the tribe Ceutorhynchini Nineteen species of Curculionidae are described from Sieb- (Curculionidae: Conoderinae: Ceutorhynchitae) is described los, Kleinkembs, and Rott (Legalov, 2020b). The weevils from the late Oligocene of Fossillagerstätte Enspel, Ger- from Enspel are often particularly well-preserved with chitin many. The new genus differs from the similar genus Steno- still present in their exoskeleton (Stankiewicz et al., 1997). carus Thomson, 1859 in the anterior margin of the prono- Some specimens from Enspel have been previously figured tum, which is not raised, a pronotum without tubercles on (Wedmann, 2000; Wedmann et al., 2010; Penney and Jepson, the sides, and a femur without teeth. This weevil is the largest 2014), but a detailed taxonomic approach was still lacking. -
Bedfordshire and Luton County Wildlife Sites
Bedfordshire and Luton County Wildlife Sites Selection Guidelines VERSION 14 December 2020 BEDFORDSHIRE AND LUTON LOCAL SITES PARTNERSHIP 1 Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................ 5 2. HISTORY OF THE CWS SYSTEM ......................................................................................................................... 7 3. CURRENT CWS SELECTION PROCESS ................................................................................................................ 8 4. Nature Conservation Review CRITERIA (modified version) ............................................................................. 10 5. GENERAL SUPPLEMENTARY FACTORS ......................................................................................................... 14 6 SITE SELECTION THRESHOLDS........................................................................................................................ 15 BOUNDARIES (all CWS) ............................................................................................................................................ 15 WOODLAND, TREES and HEDGES ........................................................................................................................ 15 TRADITIONAL ORCHARDS AND FRUIT TREES ................................................................................................. 19 ARABLE FIELD MARGINS........................................................................................................................................ -
Descriptors for Hazelnut (Corylus Avellana L.)
Descriptors for Hazelnut(Corylus avellana L.) List of Descriptors Allium (E, S) 2001 Pearl millet (E/F) 1993 Almond (revised)* (E) 1985 Pepino (E) 2004 Apple* (E) 1982 Phaseolus acutifolius (E) 1985 Apricot* (E) 1984 Phaseolus coccineus* (E) 1983 Avocado (E/S) 1995 Phaseolus lunatus (P) 2001 Bambara groundnut (E, F) 2000 Phaseolus vulgaris* (E, P) 1982 Banana (E, S, F) 1996 Pigeonpea (E) 1993 Barley (E) 1994 Pineapple (E) 1991 Beta (E) 1991 Pistachio (A, R, E, F) 1997 Black pepper (E/S) 1995 Pistacia (excluding Pistacia vera) (E) 1998 Brassica and Raphanus (E) 1990 Plum* (E) 1985 Brassica campestris L. (E) 1987 Potato variety* (E) 1985 Buckwheat (E) 1994 Quinua* (E) 1981 Cañahua (S) 2005 Rambutan 2003 Capsicum (E/S) 1995 Rice* (E) 2007 Cardamom (E) 1994 Rocket (E, I) 1999 Carrot (E, S, F) 1998 Rye and Triticale* (E) 1985 Cashew* (E) 1986 Safflower* (E) 1983 Cherry* (E) 1985 Sesame (E) 2004 Chickpea (E) 1993 Setaria italica and S. pumilia (E) 1985 Citrus (E, F, S) 1999 Shea tree (E) 2006 Coconut (E) 1995 Sorghum (E/F) 1993 Coffee (E, S, F) 1996 Soyabean* (E/C) 1984 Cotton (revised)* (E) 1985 Strawberry (E) 1986 Cowpea (E, P)* 1983 Sunflower* (E) 1985 Cultivated potato* (E) 1977 Sweet potato (E/S/F) 1991 Date Palm (F) 2005 Taro (E, F, S) 1999 Durian (E) 2007 Tea (E, S, F) 1997 Echinochloa millet* (E) 1983 Tomato (E, S, F) 1996 Eggplant (E/F) 1990 Tropical fruit (revised)* (E) 1980 Faba bean* (E) 1985 Ulluco (S) 2003 Fig (E) 2003 Vigna aconitifolia and V. -
Evidence of Low Chloroplast Genetic Diversity in Two Carpinus Species
Available online: www.notulaebotanicae.ro Print ISSN 0255-965X; Electronic 1842-4309 Not Bot Horti Agrobo, 2017, 45(1):316-322. DOI:10.15835/nbha45110799 Original Article Evidence of Low Chloroplast Genetic Diversity in Two Carpinus Species in the Northern Balkans Mihaela Cristina CĂRĂBUŞ 1, Alexandru Lucian CURTU 1, Dragoş POSTOLACHE 2, Elena CIOCÎRLAN 1, Neculae ŞOFLETEA 1* 1Transilvania University of Brasov, Department of Forest Sciences, 1 Şirul Beethoven, 500123, Braşov, Romania; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] (*corresponding author) 2National Research and Development Institute in Forestry “Marin Dracea”, 65 Horea Str., 400275 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; [email protected] Abstract Genetic diversity and differentiation in two Carpinus species ( C. betulus and C. orientalis ) occurring in Romania was investigated by using three chloroplast Simple Sequence Repeat markers (cpSSRs). A total of 96 and 32 individuals were sampled in eighteen C. betulus and six C. orientalis populations, respectively. A total of four chloroplast haplotypes were observed. Two haplotypes were specific for C. betulus and two for C. orientalis . Most of C. betulus populations were fixed for the predominant haplotype (H1), which was observed in 82% of the individuals. All C. orientalis populations were fixed for one haplotype or the other. Populations with haplotype (H3) are spread in southern Romania and the haplotype (H4) was observed at the northern limit of C. orientalis natural distribution range. Genetic differentiation among populations was moderate in C. betulus (GST = 0.422), compared to the high value observed in C. orientalis (GST = 1.000), which can be explained by the occurrence of a distinct haplotype in the peripheral population. -
A Baseline Invertebrate Survey of the Knepp Estate - 2015
A baseline invertebrate survey of the Knepp Estate - 2015 Graeme Lyons May 2016 1 Contents Page Summary...................................................................................... 3 Introduction.................................................................................. 5 Methodologies............................................................................... 15 Results....................................................................................... 17 Conclusions................................................................................... 44 Management recommendations........................................................... 51 References & bibliography................................................................. 53 Acknowledgements.......................................................................... 55 Appendices.................................................................................... 55 Front cover: One of the southern fields showing dominance by Common Fleabane. 2 0 – Summary The Knepp Wildlands Project is a large rewilding project where natural processes predominate. Large grazing herbivores drive the ecology of the site and can have a profound impact on invertebrates, both positive and negative. This survey was commissioned in order to assess the site’s invertebrate assemblage in a standardised and repeatable way both internally between fields and sections and temporally between years. Eight fields were selected across the estate with two in the north, two in the central block -
Pre-Dispersal Seed Predation by Weevils (Curculio Spp.): the Role of Host-Specificity, Resource Availability and Environmental Factors
Pre-dispersal seed predation by weevils (Curculio spp.): The role of host-specificity, resource availability and environmental factors Harold Arias-LeClaire Aquesta tesi doctoral està subjecta a la llicència Reconeixement- NoComercial – CompartirIgual 4.0. Espanya de Creative Commons. Esta tesis doctoral está sujeta a la licencia Reconocimiento - NoComercial – CompartirIgual 4.0. España de Creative Commons. This doctoral thesis is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- ShareAlike 4.0. Spain License. Pre-dispersal seed predation by weevils (Curculio spp.) The role of host-specificity, resource availability and environmental factors HAROLD ARIAS-LECLAIRE Barcelona, 2018 Pre-dispersal seed predation by weevils (Curculio spp.): The role of host-specificity, resource availability and environmental factors This page intentionally left blank Pre-dispersal seed predation by weevils (Curculio spp.): The role of host-specificity, resource availability and environmental factors Harold Arias-LeClaire Barcelona, 2018 This page intentionally left blank Pre-dispersal seed predation by weevils (Curculio spp.): The role of host-specificity, resource availability and environmental factors Harold Arias-LeClaire Thesis to be eligible for the Doctor degree and submitted in fulfillment of the requirements of Academic Doctoral program in Biodiversity with the supervision and approval of Dr. Josep Maria Espelta Morral Dr. Raúl Bonal Andrés Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona, 2018 This page intentionally left blank Facultat de Biologia Department de Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals Pre-dispersal seed predation by weevils (Curculio spp.): The role of host-specificity, resource availability and environmental factors Research memory presented by Harold Arias-LeClaire for the degree of Doctor at the Universitat de Barcelona Biodiversity Program with the approval of Dr. -
3.7.10 Curculioninae Latreille, 1802 Jetzt Beschriebenen Palaearctischen Ceuthor- Rhynchinen
Curculioninae Latreille, 1802 305 Schultze, A. (1902): Kritisches Verzeichniss der bis 3.7.10 Curculioninae Latreille, 1802 jetzt beschriebenen palaearctischen Ceuthor- rhynchinen. – Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift Roberto Caldara , Nico M. Franz, and Rolf 1902: 193 – 226. G. Oberprieler Schwarz, E. A. (1894): A “ parasitic ” scolytid. – Pro- ceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 3: Distribution. The subfamily as here composed (see 15 – 17. Phylogeny and Taxonomy below) includes approx- Scudder, S. H. (1893): Tertiary Rhynchophorous Coleo- ptera of the United States. xii + 206 pp. US Geological imately 350 genera and 4500 species (O ’ Brien & Survey, Washington, DC. Wibmer 1978; Thompson 1992; Alonso-Zarazaga Stierlin, G. (1886): Fauna insectorum Helvetiae. Coleo- & Lyal 1999; Oberprieler et al. 2007), provisionally ptera helvetiae , Volume 2. 662 pp. Rothermel & Cie., divided into 34 tribes. These are geographically Schaffhausen. generally restricted to a lesser or larger degree, only Thompson, R. T. (1973): Preliminary studies on the two – Curculionini and Rhamphini – being virtually taxonomy and distribution of the melon weevil, cosmopolitan in distribution and Anthonomini , Acythopeus curvirostris (Boheman) (including Baris and Tychiini only absent from the Australo-Pacifi c granulipennis (Tournier)) (Coleoptera, Curculion- region. Acalyptini , Cionini , Ellescini , Mecinini , idae). – Bulletin of Entomological Research 63: 31 – 48. and Smicronychini occur mainly in the Old World, – (1992): Observations on the morphology and clas- from Africa to the Palaearctic and Oriental regions, sifi cation of weevils (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) with Ellescini, Acalyptini, and Smicronychini also with a key to major groups. – Journal of Natural His- extending into the Nearctic region and at least tory 26: 835 – 891. the latter two also into the Australian one.