DOCSLIB.ORG

1 List of Advocacy Groups, Interest Groups, Other Representative Organisations and Political Parties Submissions to the Citizens

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

List of Advocacy Groups, Interest Groups, other Representative Organisations and Political Parties Submissions to the Citizens’ Assembly on the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution If you are an organisation that made a submission to the Assembly and are not included in the list below, please contact us at [email protected]. 1. Abortion Rights Campaign 2. Abortion Support Network, UK 3. Action for Choice 4. AkiDwA (Akina Dada wa Africa) 5. Amanda Mellet and the Centre for Reproductive Rights, Switzerland 6. Amnesty International 7. Antenatal Results and Choices, UK 8. Anti-Austerity Alliance 9. Artists Campaign to Repeal the Eighth Amendment 10. AIMS – Ireland (Association for Improvements in the Maternity Services – Ireland) 11. Atheist Ireland 12. Berlin Ireland Pro Choice Solidarity Group 13. Carlow Healing Rooms 14. Catholics for Choice, US 15. Centre for Disability Law and Policy – NUIG 16. Christian Fellowship Church (Greenhill) 17. CitizenGO 18. Clare Women’s Network 1 19. Coalition to Repeal the Eighth Amendment 20. Communist Party of Ireland 21. Community Work Ireland 22. Cork Women’s Right to Choose 23. Council for the Status of the Family 24. DCU Feminist Society 25. DCU Life Society 26. Doctors for Choice 27. Doctors for Life Ireland 28. European Life Network 29. European Network Against Racism (ENAR) Ireland - ENAR Ireland 30. Evangelical Alliance Ireland 31. Evangelical Alliance Northern Ireland 32. Every Life Counts 33. Families Strengthening Families Ireland T/A Family.ie 34. Family & Life 35. Family and Media Association 36. Fathers4Justice 37. Fianna Fáil 38. Galway Christian Fellowship 39. Galway for Life 40. Galway One World Centre 41. Galway Pro Choice 42. Gay Community News 43. Hope Project 2 44. IADT Students’ Union 45. IMELDA (Ireland Making England the Legal Destination for Abortion) 46. IMPACT Trade Union 47. International Spiritist Medical Association 48. Ireland Stand Up 49. Irish Catholic Bishops’ Conference 50. Irish Catholic Doctors Association 51. Irish Congress of Trade Unions (ICTU) 52. Irish Council for Civil Liberties 53. Irish Diaspora Belgium 54. Irish Family Planning Association 55. Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission 56. Irish Penal Reform Trust 57. Life NI 58. Limerick Feminist Network 59. Limerick Women’s Network 60. London Irish LGBT Network 61. London-Irish Abortion Rights Campaign 62. Louth Pro-Life Network 63. MaterCare International 64. Maynooth Students’ Union 65. Meath for Choice 66. Midwives for Choice 67. National Collective of Community Based Women’s Networks (NCCWN) – including submissions from the following regional branches: Access 2000 3 (Wexford), Blaney Blades, Clare, Claremorris, Clondalkin, Dochas for Women, Donegal, North Leitrim, Ronanstown, Roscommon, Rowlagh, Southside, Southwest Kerry, Waterford, Women Together Tallaght and Women’s Community Project (Mullingar). 68. National Traveller Women’s Forum 69. National Women’s Council of Ireland 70. NUI Galway Students’ Union 71. One Day More 72. One Family 73. Parents for Choice 74. People Before Profit Alliance 75. People Before Profit Pro Choice 76. Pharmacists for Choice 77. Presbyterian Church in Ireland 78. Pro Life Campaign 79. Pro-Life Muslims 80. Rape Crisis Network Ireland 81. REAL Women of Canada 82. Reformed Presbyterian Church of Ireland, Public Morals Committee 83. Repeal Global 84. Repeal the 8th Sligo Abortion Rights Campaign 85. Reproductive Health Law and Policy Advisory Group 86. Roscommon for Life 87. SAFE Ireland 88. SAOL Project 89. Second Look Project 4 90. Sinn Féin 91. Social Democrats 92. TFMR Ireland (Termination for Medical Reasons) 93. The de Borda Institute 94. The Droichead Project for Autism 95. The General Synod of the Church of Ireland 96. The Green Party 97. The Iona Institute 98. The Jack and Jill Children’s Foundation 99. The Labour Party 100. The Life Institute 101. The National LGBT Federation (NXF) 102. The Ordo Iuris Institution for Legal Culture, Poland 103. The Society for the Protection of Unborn Children 104. The Well Woman Centre 105. The Workers’ Party 106. The Workers’ Party – Dublin Central Branch 107. Tipp for Choice 108. Trade Union Campaign to Repeal the 8th 109. Trinity College Dublin Students’ Union 110. UCaN – Unborn Children’s advocacy Network, Australia 111. UCC Amnesty International Society 112. UCC Feminist Society 113. UCC Students’ Union 114. UCD Centre for Gender, Feminism and Sexualities 5 115. UCD LGBTQ+ Society 116. UCD Students for Fair Representation 117. UCD Students’ Union 118. Union of Students in Ireland (USI) 119. UNITE Trade Union 120. University of Texas at Austin 121. Waterford IT Students’ Union 122. West Clare Family Resource Centre 123. Wicklow Pro-Life 124. Women Hurt 125. Word of Victory Christian Fellowship Killarney 126. Youth Defence 6 .
Recommended publications
  • The 2013 Irish Legislation on Abortion: Turning-Point Or Missed Opportunity?

    The 2013 Irish Legislation on Abortion: Turning-Point Or Missed Opportunity?

    NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND GALWAY European Master’s Degree in Human Rights and Democratisation A.Y. 2013/2014 The 2013 Irish legislation on abortion: turning-point or missed opportunity? A critical analysis from a human rights perspective Author: Chiara Cosentino Supervisor: Noelle Higgins Ackowledgements I would like to thank Noelle Higgins, from the NUI of Galway, for the supervision of the present work and for her precise and insightful comments and suggestions. Furthermore, I would like to deeply thank the contacted civil society organisations that kindly and enthusiastically agreed on allowing me to steal a bit of their time for interviews. They were fundamental for my analysis, for the perception from the ground they gave me, and for the global picture that I could capture from their different angles of perspective on the topic. In particular I would love to thank for their availability Richie Keane (Coordinator of Doctors For Choice), Sinéad Corcoran (member of the Policy and Advocacy Team of Abortion Right Campaign), Kelly Mackey (from the Campaign Office of Amnesty International Ireland), Maeve Taylor (Senior Policy and Advocacy Officer of the Irish Family Planning Association) and Dette McLoughlin, John Walshe and Joseph Loughnane (members of Galway Pro-Choice). I would also like to thank my family, my parents, my sister and my grandmother for their unconditional support, and for making my participation in this Master possible, both with their practical help and love. I missed them throughout this year, but we all know that, wherever I am, they are always in my heart. Moreover, I would like to thank all my friends, old and new, for what they mean and they will always mean to me.
  • Anti Choice Extremists Defeated in Ireland but New Abortion Legislation Is Worthless - Infoshop News

    Anti Choice Extremists Defeated in Ireland but New Abortion Legislation Is Worthless - Infoshop News

    7/23/13 Anti choice extremists defeated in Ireland but new abortion legislation is worthless - Infoshop News Contribute Advanced Search Site Statistics Directory aboutus editorial getpublished moderation Polls Calendar "Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth." Welcome to Infoshop News Tuesday, July 23 2013 @ 11:22 AM CDT advanced search Search Main Menu Anti choice extremists defeated in Ireland but new abortion legislation is Infoshop Home worthless Infoshop News Home Contact Us Thursday, July 18 2013 @ 01:13 AM CDT Contributed by: Admin Views: 593 Occupy Sandy Despite spending in the region of a million euro and getting the backing of the catholic church its now clear that the anti­choice extremists of Youth Defence & the Pro Life Campaign were resoundingly defeated when the Dail finally voted though legislation implementing the X­Case judgment of 21 years ago. This time last year they were confident that they already had enough Fine Gael TD's on board to block the required legislation but they reckoned against the wave of public anger that followed the death of Savita Halappanavar after she was denied a potentially life saving abortion in a Galway hospital. Anti choice extremists defeated in Ireland but new abortion legislation is worthless by AndrewNFlood Anarchist Writers July 15, 2013 Despite spending in the region of a million euro and getting the backing of the catholic church its now clear that the anti­choice extremists of Youth Defence & the Pro Life Campaign were resoundingly defeated when the Dail finally voted though legislation implementing the X­Case judgment of 21 years ago.
  • Submission to the Citizens' Assembly

    Submission to the Citizens' Assembly

    Submission to the Citizens’ Assembly SUBMISSION TO THE CITIZENS’ ASSEMBLY TABLE OF CONTENTS The Abortion Rights Campaign 4 Introduction 5 Repealing the 8th Amendment 6 Why we should repeal the 8th 7 The reality of abortion in Ireland 9 The reality of the 8th Amendment in Ireland 12 International Condemnation 13 Free, Safe, Legal 15 Why we need free, safe, legal abortion access 16 Availability in the public health system 17 Abortion on request 18 Gestational limits 19 Decriminalisation 21 Conscientious objection 23 Conclusion 26 Let women choose 27 Abortion Stories 28 3 THE ABORTION RIGHTS CAMPAIGN The Abortion Rights Campaign (ARC) is a grassroots movement for choice and change in Ireland. We organise the annual March for Choice, which this year saw 20,000 people take to the streets of Dublin to demand a change to Ireland’s abortion laws. We aim to promote broad national support for a referendum to repeal the 8th Amendment and the introduction of free, safe and legal abortion access in the State. We believe women can be trusted to choose, and we aim to ensure the health and rights of women in Ireland are protected in line with international best practice and human rights standards. We welcome the opportunity to make a submission to the Citizens’ Assembly during its consideration of the 8th Amendment to the Constitution. 4 INTRODUCTION As the largest grassroots pro-choice organisation in Ireland, we represent those people directly affected by the 8th Amendment. We represent the 12 women each day who leave Irish shores to access standard medical care.
  • On Strategy: a Primer Edited by Nathan K. Finney

    On Strategy: a Primer Edited by Nathan K. Finney

    Cover design by Dale E. Cordes, Army University Press On Strategy: A Primer Edited by Nathan K. Finney Combat Studies Institute Press Fort Leavenworth, Kansas An imprint of The Army University Press Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Finney, Nathan K., editor. | U.S. Army Combined Arms Cen- ter, issuing body. Title: On strategy : a primer / edited by Nathan K. Finney. Other titles: On strategy (U.S. Army Combined Arms Center) Description: Fort Leavenworth, Kansas : Combat Studies Institute Press, US Army Combined Arms Center, 2020. | “An imprint of The Army University Press.” | Includes bibliographical references. Identifiers: LCCN 2020020512 (print) | LCCN 2020020513 (ebook) | ISBN 9781940804811 (paperback) | ISBN 9781940804811 (Adobe PDF) Subjects: LCSH: Strategy. | Strategy--History. Classification: LCC U162 .O5 2020 (print) | LCC U162 (ebook) | DDC 355.02--dc23 | SUDOC D 110.2:ST 8. LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2020020512. LC ebook record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2020020513. 2020 Combat Studies Institute Press publications cover a wide variety of military topics. The views ex- pressed in this CSI Press publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the Depart- ment of the Army or the Department of Defense. A full list of digital CSI Press publications is available at https://www.armyu- press.army.mil/Books/combat-studies-institute. The seal of the Combat Studies Institute authenticates this document as an of- ficial publication of the CSI Press. It is prohibited to use the CSI’s official seal on any republication without the express written permission of the director. Editors Diane R.
  • The Impact of Youth Work in Europe: a Study of Five European Countries

    The Impact of Youth Work in Europe: a Study of Five European Countries

    The Impact of Youth Work in Europe: A Study of Five European Countries Edited by Jon Ord with Marc Carletti, Susan Cooper, Christophe Dansac, Daniele Morciano, Lasse Siurala and Marti Taru The Impact of Youth Work in Europe: A Study of Five European Countries ISBN 978-952-456-301-7 (printed) ISBN 978-952-456-302-4 (online) ISSN 2343-0664 (printed) ISSN 2343-0672 (online) Humak University of Applied Sciences Publications, 56. © 2018 Authors Jon Ord with Marc Carletti, Susan Cooper, Christophe Dansac, Daniele Morciano, Lasse Siurala and Marti Taru Layout Emilia Reponen Cover Clayton Thomas Printing house Juvenes Print - Suomen yliopistopaino Oy Printing place Helsinki Dedicated to all the young people who shared their stories Contents Acknowledgements ............................................. 10 Notes on Contributors ......................................... 11 Jon Ord Introduction ......................................................... 13 Section One: The Context of Youth Work Manfred Zentner and Jon Ord Chapter 1: European Youth Work Policy Context ...17 Jon Ord and Bernard Davies Chapter 2: Youth Work in the UK (England) .......... 32 Lasse Siurala Chapter 3: Youth Work in Finland ........................ 49 Marti Taru Chapter 4: Youth Work in Estonia ........................ 63 Daniele Morciano Chapter 5: Youth Work in Italy ............................. 74 Marc Carletti and Christophe Dansac Chapter 6: Youth Work in France ......................... 86 Susan Cooper Chapter 7: Methodology of Transformative Evaluation .................................... 100 Section Two: The Impact of Youth Work Jon Ord Background to the Research and Analysis of Findings ...................................... 112 Susan Cooper Chapter 8: Impact of Youth Work in the UK (England) .............................................. 116 Lasse Siurala and Eeva Sinisalo-Juha Chapter 9: Impact of Youth Work in Finland ......... 138 Marti Taru and Kaur Kötsi Chapter 10: Impact of Youth Work in Estonia ......
  • The Pro-Choice Movement in Ireland Áine Ní Mhainnín

    The Pro-Choice Movement in Ireland Áine Ní Mhainnín

    mhAinnín | Pro Choice 38 mhAinnín | Pro Choice The power of women’s voices: the pro-choice movement in Ireland ÁIne ní mhaInnín avita Halappanavar was 31 years old. Originally from India, she moved to the west of Ireland to be Swith her husband, Praveen. On 21st October 2012, she and Praveen arrived at University College Hospital Galway. Savita was 17 weeks pregnant and suffering from back pain. Told she was miscar- - fused each time, once given the reason that Ireland was a ‘Catholic country’. Finally, after Savita had spent 2 ½ days in agony, the foetal heartbeat stopped and the foetus was removed. Savita died on 28 October 2012. Her death was recorded as a result of severe sepsis, E. coli in the bloodstream and a miscarriage at 17 weeks. Having returned from Savita’s funeral in India, Praveen recounted her story to the Irish Times. It was woman to die through refusing her a termination, was receiving global attention. That evening, within only a few hours of the story being posted, several hundred attended a vigil outside the Dáil (Irish rallies did not occur in a bubble, but have been the focal point of a change of mood over the last year or so in relation to a woman’s right to choose. Ireland’s barbaric position came about through the suc- cess of anti-choice lobby groups in blurring the distinction between Church and State, resulting in a Background The 1861 Offences Against the Person Act prohibited the procurement of a miscarriage within the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland.
  • Women's Legal Landmarks

    Women's Legal Landmarks

    Women’s Legal Landmarks Celebrating the History of Women and Law in the UK and Ireland Edited by Erika Rackley and Rosemary Auchmuty HART PUBLISHING Bloomsbury Publishing Plc Kemp House , Chawley Park, Cumnor Hill, Oxford , OX2 9PH , UK HART PUBLISHING, the Hart/Stag logo, BLOOMSBURY and the Diana logo are trademarks of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc First published in Great Britain 2019 Reprinted 2019 Copyright © The editors and contributors severally 2019 The editors and contributors have asserted their right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 to be identifi ed as Authors of this work. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publishers. While every care has been taken to ensure the accuracy of this work, no responsibility for loss or damage occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any statement in it can be accepted by the authors, editors or publishers. All UK Government legislation and other public sector information used in the work is Crown Copyright © . All House of Lords and House of Commons information used in the work is Parliamentary Copyright © . This information is reused under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 ( http://www. nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3 ) except where otherwise stated. All Eur-lex material used in the work is © European Union, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/ , 1998–2019.
  • Ireland, Abortion Access and the Movement to Remove the Eighth Amendment

    Ireland, Abortion Access and the Movement to Remove the Eighth Amendment

    “#Repealthe8th”: Ireland, Abortion Access and the Movement to Remove the Eighth Amendment SINÉAD KENNEDY*1 Abstract Abortion is illegal in almost all circumstances in Ireland, permitted only where there is a risk to the life of the woman due to the eighth amend- ment to the Irish Constitution. While abortion is banned, women living in Ireland do access abortion; they do so legally by travelling abroad, and illegally within Ireland by accessing the abortion pill online. This access is highly mediated by race, class and migration status. This article will consider the politics of Ireland’s abortion ban through the prism of public debates around abortion, reflecting on the discursive devices employed to both chal- lenge and uphold the status quo on abortion. This conclusion will focus on different dimensions of the “Repeal” movement; a movement that pro- pelled Ireland to finally face up to the reality of abortion and change it laws through removing the eighth amendment from the constitution. Keywords: Abortion; Migration; Repeal; Movement; Ireland On Friday 25th May 2018 the Irish electorate voted by two to one majority to remove Article 40.3.3, the prohibition on abortion, from the Irish Con- stitution. While opinion polls had suggested that those who campaigned to remove the ban on abortion would win, it was predicted to be a close result; no one predicted the sheer scale of the victory and the support from every section of society, young and old, urban and rural. In the immediate aftermath of the referendum the result was heralded as nothing short of revolutionary by journalists and activists alike who understood it to be part of a major gender and generational shift in Irish political life.
  • Human Rights Compliant Framework for Abortion in Ireland

    Human Rights Compliant Framework for Abortion in Ireland

    16 December 2016 Amnesty International Ireland HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLIANT FRAMEWORK FOR ABORTION IN IRELAND Submission to the Citizens’ Assembly DEFINITIONS International human rights treaty: also sometimes called a Covenant or a Convention, is adopted by the international community of States, normally at the United Nations General Assembly. Each treaty sets out a range of human rights, and corresponding obligations which are legally binding on States that have ratified the treaty. Treaty monitoring body: each of the international human rights treaties is monitored by a designated treaty monitoring body. The treaty monitoring bodies are committees composed of independent experts. Their main function is to monitor the States’ compliance with the treaty in question, including through the examination of State reports. General comments/recommendations: a treaty monitoring body’s interpretation of the con- tent of human rights provisions on thematic issues or its methods of work. General com- ments seek to clarify the reporting duties of State parties with respect to certain provisions and suggest approaches to implementing treaty provisions. Concluding observations: following submission of a State report and a constructive di- alogue with the State party to the particular convention, treaty monitoring bodies issue concluding observations to the reporting State, which are compiled in an annual report and sent to the United Nations General Assembly. Human rights standards: the meaning and scope of human rights as interpreted and applied by the human rights bodies tasked with this work, e.g. international, regional and national courts, and human rights committees. Drawn from the World Health Organisation’s Safe abortion: technical and policy guidance for health systems, second edition (2012) Human Rights Compliant Framework for Abortion in Ireland - Submission to the Citizens’ Assembly CONTENTS DEFINITIONS............................................................................................................................
  • Roman Catholic Church in Ireland 1990-2010

    Roman Catholic Church in Ireland 1990-2010

    The Paschal Dimension of the 40 Days as an interpretive key to a reading of the new and serious challenges to faith in the Roman Catholic Church in Ireland 1990-2010 Kevin Doherty Doctor of Philosophy 2011 MATER DEI INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION A College of Dublin City University The Paschal Dimension of the 40 Days as an interpretive key to a reading of the new and serious challenges to faith in the Roman Catholic Church in Ireland 1990-2010 Kevin Doherty M.A. (Spirituality) Moderator: Dr Brendan Leahy, DD Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2011 DECLARATION I hereby certify that this material, which I now submit for assessment on the programme of study leading to the award of Ph.D. is entirely my own work and has not been taken from the work of others save and to the extent that such work has been cited and acknowledged within the text of my work. ID No: 53155831 Date: ' M l 2 - 0 1 DEDICATION To my parents Betty and Donal Doherty. The very first tellers of the Easter Story to me, and always the most faithful tellers of that Story. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS A special thanks to all in the Diocese of Rockville Centre in New York who gave generously of their time and experience to facilitate this research: to Msgr Bob Brennan (Vicar General), Sr Mary Alice Piil (Director of Faith Formation), Marguerite Goglia (Associate Director, Children and Youth Formation), Lee Hlavecek, Carol Tannehill, Fr Jim Mannion, Msgr Bill Hanson. Also, to Fr Neil Carlin of the Columba Community in Donegal and Derry, a prophet of the contemporary Irish Church.
  • Heresa Morrow: RTÉ One TV: the Late Late Show: 8Th Jan 2016…………………………….81

    Heresa Morrow: RTÉ One TV: the Late Late Show: 8Th Jan 2016…………………………….81

    Broadcasting Authority of Ireland Broadcasting Complaint Decisions September 2016 Broadcasting Complaint Decisions Contents BAI Complaints Handling Process Page 4 Upheld by the BAI Compliance Committee 26/16 - Mr. Francis Clauson: TV3: ‘The Power to Power Ourselves’ (Advert): 10th Jan 2016………………5 27/16 - Mr. Francis Clauson: RTÉ One TV: ‘The Power to Power Ourselves’ (Advert): 16th Jan 2016….…9 29/16 - Intro Matchmaking: Sunshine 106.8: Two’s Company (Advert):16th Feb 2016…………….………13 Rejected by the BAI Compliance Committee 7/16 - Mr. Brendan Burgess: RTÉ One TV: Ireland’s Great Wealth Divide: 21st Sept 2015……………….16 13/16 - Mr. Martin Hawkes: RTÉ One TV: Prime Time: 3rd Dec 2015……………………………………….23 15/16 - An Taisce: RTÉ One TV: Prime Time: 3rd Dec 2015………………………………………………….28 30/16 - Mr. Pawel Rydzewski: RTÉ One TV: The Late Late Show: 22nd Jan 2016…………………………38 32/16 - Mr Séamus Enright: TV3: TV3 Leaders’ Debate: 11th Feb 2016………………………………….…41 35/16 - Mr. John Flynn: RTÉ One TV: The Late Late Show: 19th Feb 2016…………………………………45 37/16 - Mr. Enda Fanning: RTÉ One TV: The Late Late Show: 19th Feb 2016……………………………48 Rejected by the Executive Complaints Forum 8-10/16 - Mr. Brendan O’ Regan: Newstalk: The Pat Kenny Show: 2nd – 4th Dec 2015……………………52 19/16 - Ms. Patricia Kearney: RTÉ Radio 1: When Dave Met Bob: 29th Dec 2015…………………………58 21/16 – Ms. Mary Jo Gilligan: RTÉ Radio 1: The Ray D’Arcy Show: 14th Nov 2015………………………61 22/16 - Mr. Brendan O’ Regan: Newstalk: Lunchtime: 30th Nov 2015…………………………………….…64 23/16 - Mr. Brendan O’ Regan: Newstalk: The Pat Kenny Show: 1st Dec 2015………………………….…64 25/16 - Mr.
  • Guerrilla Glamour: the Queer Tactics of Dr. Panti Bliss Emer O'toole

    Guerrilla Glamour: the Queer Tactics of Dr. Panti Bliss Emer O'toole

    Guerrilla Glamour: The Queer Tactics of Dr. Panti Bliss Emer O'Toole Éire-Ireland, Volume 52, Numbers 3 & 4, Fall/Winter 2017, pp. 104-121 (Article) Published by Irish-American Cultural Institute DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/eir.2017.0024 For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/680366 Access provided by New York University (13 Feb 2018 16:50 GMT) Emer O’Toole Guerrilla Glamour: The Queer Tactics of Dr. Panti Bliss Setting the Scene Drag queen Panti Bliss should be conservative Ireland’s worst gay nightmare. Erstwhile organizer of kink nights, openly HIV positive, landlady of a Northside Dublin gay bar, and author of a memoir de- tailing performance art that involves pulling interesting things from her anus, Bliss strays very far from what some queer theorists (e.g., Butler, “Kinship”; Warner; Duggan; Mulhall) consider assimilation- ist political strategies—that is, from gaining rights through modeling gay lifestyles on heterosexual ones rather than through challenging heterosexual institutions. Yet in 2014, following a series of high- profile media and legal events, Bliss became a unifying figurehead for Ireland’s marriage-equality efforts, a self-professed accidental activist whose efforts were crucial to securing a resounding 62 percent vic- tory for the Yes Equality campaign in Ireland’s referendum on same- sex marriage. This article draws on performativity theory to argue for the counterintuitive position that it is precisely Bliss’s status as an os- tentatious drag queen that renders her palatable to a hetero- sexist and homophobic society. It analyzes Bliss’s now iconic “Noble Call” speech from the stage of the Abbey Theatre on 1 Febru- ary 2014 as well as the messaging tactics of the Yes Equality campaign in order to contend that drag provides Bliss permission to speak de- nied to everyday queer behaviors and identities.