The Evolution of Variability in Magic, Divination and Religion
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
THE EVOLUTION OF VARIABILITY IN MAGIC, DIVINATION AND RELIGION: A MULTI-LEVEL SELECTION ANALYSIS A Dissertation by CATHARINA LAPORTE Submitted to the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Chair of Committee, Michael S. Alvard Committee Members, Jeffrey Winking D. Bruce Dickson Jane Sell Head of Department, Cynthia A. Werner December 2013 Major Subject: Anthropology Copyright 2013 Catharina Laporte ABSTRACT Religious behavior varies greatly both with-in cultures and cross-culturally. Throughout history, scientific scholars of religion have debated the definition, function, or lack of function for religious behavior. The question remains: why doesn’t one set of beliefs suit everybody and every culture? Using mixed methods, the theoretical logic of Multi-Level Selection hypothesis (MLS) which has foundations in neo-evolutionary theory, and data collected during nearly two years of field work in Macaé Brazil, this study asserts that religious variability exists because of the historic and dynamic relationship between the individual, the family, the (religious) group and other groups. By re-representing a nuanced version of Elman Service’s sociopolitical typologies together with theorized categories of religion proposed by J.G. Frazer, Anthony C. Wallace and Max Weber, in a multi-level nested hierarchy, I argue that variability in religious behavior sustains because it provides adaptive advantages and solutions to group living on multiple levels. These adaptive strategies may be more important or less important depending on the time, place, individual or group. MLS potentially serves to unify the various functional theories of religion and can be used to analyze why some religions, at different points in history, may attract and retain more adherents by reacting to the environment and providing a dynamic balance between what the individual needs and what the group needs. Primarily I test, and find support for the hypothesis that magical behaviors are pursuits primarily undertaken to achieve personal or kin related needs. In this data set, 78% of magical behaviors target individuals or their immediate kin. Data analysis also ii highlights various adaptive strategies that the group may have evolved to maintain group membership and cohesion. These include the use of stereotypes and specific norms that control or suppress how individuals within the group communicate their needs: a concept referred to as ‘privatizing the public’. In these ‘privatized’ spaces, 93% of magical behaviors target the individual or their immediate kin. For example, confessing ones perceived sins or using magic to help cure a loved one are often behaviors performed with little or no audience or listeners. Furthermore the data illustrate that because of conflicts between the levels within the nested hierarchy, both the individual and the group may reevaluate their stance on what behaviors they adopt or accept. Analysis of the data also illustrates how magical behaviors provide powerful signals within and without the religious group. Specifically I provide a concrete cultural example of the ‘Green Beard’ affect by documenting how Catholic religious symbolism was purposefully adopted by Afro-Brazilian religious practitioners. Furthermore the data illustrate how some religious groups have hijacked the individual’s propensity for magical thinking and use these behaviors as creditability enhancing and inferentially potent displays which in turn create content or confirmation biases for the practices. Finally this study hypothesizes how, using the logic of MLS together with data collected on the Afro-Brazilian religious offering, the ultimate benefit of costly signaling may extend beyond the individual, their immediate family or social group. Costly signals, made anonymously, may provide a strategic advantage that enables the group to thrive and compete against other social groups. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work would not have been possible without the enduring and unwavering love and support of my husband, guidance counselor, number one fan, banker and best friend, David. To my wonderful and much loved parents, John and Elisabeth Mandic, thank you for instilling, supporting and encouraging my independence, lifelong love of travel, world cultures and education. You encouraged me to be a cultural anthropologist before I knew what one was! Additionally I would like to sincerely thank my many, dear friends and family around the world for their moral and emotional support. I am reluctant to name names for fear of forgetting someone. This work would not have been possible without my Brazilian friends and contacts who each took the leap of faith and trusted my academic motivations. Thank you for your confidence, support, honesty and time. Abraços e beijos. Last, but not least, I would like to thank the superb teachers and professors who have inspired and guided me: Michael Alvard, Jeff Winking, Bruce Dickson, Jane Sell, Nanda Grow, Cynthia Werner and Jason Moulenbelt. Each one of you have challenged my assumptions and made me realize that the more you think you know, the less you actually know. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT .......................................................................................................................ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................................................................................. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................... v LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................ viii LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................. x CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION: MULTI-LEVEL SELECTION (MLS) AS A UNIFYING HYPOTHESIS TO ANALYZE VARIABILITY IN RELIGION ................. 1 Defining Religion ........................................................................................................... 2 What are Religious Behaviors? .................................................................................. 3 What are Magical Behaviors? .................................................................................... 6 Genetic versus Cultural Evolution ................................................................................. 8 Background .................................................................................................................. 10 Magic and Divination Concerned with the Basics of Life ........................................... 15 Review of the Evolutionary Literature Pertaining to Religion ..................................... 21 Religion as an Autonomous Organisms – or – Memetic selection ......................... 22 Religion as By-Product ............................................................................................ 23 Religion as an Individual Human Adaptation .......................................................... 27 Religion as a With-in Group Function ..................................................................... 28 Between Group Function .......................................................................................... 32 Religion as a Multivariate, Contextual, Interactional Suite of Interconnected Traits ......................................................................................................................... 33 Multi-Level Selection Theory (MLS).......................................................................... 34 Synthesis in Social Science and Humanities ................................................................ 39 Statement of the Problem and Purpose of this Study ................................................... 41 Hypotheses and Predictions ......................................................................................... 42 Inherent Problems Studying Religion .......................................................................... 45 The Design, Methods and Procedures .......................................................................... 47 Methods .................................................................................................................... 48 Field Site ................................................................................................................... 49 Sampling ...................................................................................................................51 Methodology ............................................................................................................ 51 Data Analysis ........................................................................................................... 56 Coding the Data ........................................................................................................ 57 Limitations of this Study .............................................................................................. 58 What to Expect in the Following Chapters .................................................................. 60 v Page CHAPTER II ANALYZING RELIGIOUS BEHAVIORS USING THE LOGIC OF MULTI-LEVEL SELECTION (MLS) ............................................................................. 62 Data Analysis ............................................................................................................... 67 Stage One Coding – Document Categorical