PPG Monthly Program
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Monument Creek Watershed Landscape Assessment
MonumentMonument CreekCreek WatershedWatershed LandscapeLandscape AssessmentAssessment a Legacy Resource Management Program Project Monument Creek Watershed Landscape Assessment prepared for: United States Air Force Academy 8120 Edgerton Dr Ste 40 Air Force Academy CO 80840-2400 prepared by: John Armstrong and Joe Stevens Colorado Natural Heritage Program 254 General Services Building Colorado State University, College of Natural Resources Fort Collins CO 80523 31 January 2002 Copyright 2002 Colorado Natural Heritage Program Cover photo: Panorama of Pikes Peak and the Rampart Range (the western boundary of the Monument Creek Watershed) from Palmer Park. Photograph by J. Armstrong. Funding provided by the Legacy Resource Management Program, administered by the US Army Corps of Engineers. table of contents list of figures ................................................................................................3 list of tables ..................................................................................................3 list of maps ..................................................................................................3 list of photographs .....................................................................................4 acknowledgements...........................................................................................5 introduction .......................................................................................................7 project history .............................................................................................7 -
Wieder, W. R., and N. W. Bower. 2004. Fire History of the Aiken
THE SOUTHWESTERN NATURALIST 49(2):239±298 JUNE 2004 NOTES FIRE HISTORY OF THE AIKEN CANYON GRASSLAND-WOODLAND ECOTONE IN THE SOUTHERN FOOTHILLS OF THE COLORADO FRONT RANGE WILLIAM R. WIEDER AND NATHAN W. BOWER* Environmental Science Program, Colorado College, 14 East Cache La Poudre, Colorado Springs, CO 80903 *Correspondent: [email protected] ABSTRACT A ®re history for the Aiken Canyon Nature Conservancy preserve in Colorado is presented. Eighteen cross-sections cut from ponderosa pine recorded 20 ®re events for the period spanning 1602 to 1999. An unusually small median ®re interval (MFI) of 7.5 years was obtained for the period 1753 to 1935. A signi®cant association was found between El Nino weather patterns and the ®res at Aiken Canyon. A shorter MFI was observed in the grasslands, which are at lower elevations. Fires from railroads or cattle ranching might have caused the shorter MFI in the grass- lands between 1872 and 1935. After 1935, ®re suppression became common. RESUMEN Se presenta la historia de fuegos en la reserva de la Aiken Canyon Nature Conser- vancy en Colorado. Dieciocho secciones cortadas de Pinus ponderosa registraron 20 acontecimien- tos de fuego en el perõÂodo de 1602 a 1999. Un medio excepcionalmente pequenÄo del intervalo de fuego (MIF) de 7.5 anÄos se obtuvo por el perõÂodo de 1753 a 1935. Se encontro una asociacioÂn signi®cativa entre patrones de tiempo de El NinÄo y fuegos en el Aiken Canyon. Un MIF maÂs corto se observo en los prados que estaÂn en elevaciones maÂs bajas. Fuegos de los ferrocarriles o de ranchos de ganado pudieron haber causado el MIF corto en los prados entre 1872 y 1935. -
Colorado 1 (! 1 27 Y S.P
# # # # # # # # # ######## # # ## # # # ## # # # # # 1 2 3 4 5 # 6 7 8 9 1011121314151617 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ) " 8 Muddy !a Ik ") 24 6 ") (!KÂ ) )¬ (! LARAMIE" KIMBALL GARDEN 1 ") I¸ 6 Medicine Bow !` Lodg Centennial 4 ep National Federal ole (! 9 Lake McConaughy CARBON Forest I§ Kimball 9 CHEYENNE 11 C 12 1 Potter CURT GOWDY reek Bushnell (! 11 ") 15 ") ") Riverside (! LARAMIE ! ") Ik ( ") (! ) " Colorado 1 8 (! 1 27 Y S.P. ") Pine !a 2 Ij Cree Medicine Bow 2 KÂ 6 .R. 3 12 2 7 9 ) Flaming Gorge R ") " National 34 .P. (! Burns Bluffs k U ") 10 5 National SWEETWATER Encampment (! 7 KEITH 40 Forest (! Red Buttes (! 4 Egbert ") 8 Sidney 10 Lodgepole Recreation Area 796 (! DEUEL ") ) " ") 2 ! 6 ") 3 ( Albany ") 9 2 A (! 6 9 ) River 27 6 Ik !a " 1 2 3 6 3 CHEYENNE ") Brule K ") on ") G 4 10 Big Springs Jct. 9 lli ") ) Ik " ") 3 Chappell 2 14 (! (! 17 4 ") Vermi S Woods Landing ") !a N (! Ik ) ! 8 15 8 " ") ) ( " !a # ALBANY 3 3 ^! 5 7 2 3 ") ( Big Springs ") ") (! 4 3 (! 11 6 2 ek ") 6 WYOMING MI Dixon Medicine Bow 4 Carpenter Barton ") (! (! 6 RA I« 10 ) Baggs Tie Siding " Cre Savery (! ! (! National ") ( 6 O 7 9 B (! 4 Forest 8 9 5 4 5 Flaming UTAH 2 5 15 9 A Dutch John Mountain ") Y I¸11 Gorge (! 4 NEBRASKA (! (! Powder K Res. ^ Home tonwo 2 ^ NE t o o ! C d ! ell h Little En (! WYOMING 3 W p ! 7 as S Tala Sh (! W Slater cam ^ ") Ovid 4 ! ! mant Snake River pm ^ ^ 3 ! es Cr (! ! ! ^ Li ! Gr Mi en ^ ^ ^ ttle eek 8 ! ^JULESBURG een Creek k Powder Wash ddle t ! Hereford (! ! 8 e NORTHGATE 4 ( Peetz ! ! Willo ork K R Virginia Jumbo Lake Sedgwick ! ! # T( ") Cre F ing (! 1 ek Y 7 RA ^ Cre CANYON ek Lara (! Dale B I§ w Big Creek o k F e 2 9 8 Cre 9 Cr x DAGGETT o Fo m Lakes e 7 C T(R B r NATURE TRAIL ") A ee u So k i e e lde d 7 r lomon e k a I« 1 0 Cr mil h k k r 17 t r r 293 PERKINS River Creek u e 9 River Pawnee v 1 e o e ") Carr ree r Rockport Stuc Poud 49 7 r® Dry S Ri C National 22 SENTINAL La HAMILTON RESERVOIR/ (! (! k 6 NE e A Gr e Halligan Res. -
Pikes Peak Massif
Wild Connections Conservation Plan for the Pike & San Isabel National Forests Chapter 5 – Complexes: Area-Specific Management Recommendations This section contains our detailed, area-specific proposal utilizing the theme based approach to land management. As an organizational tool, this proposal divides the Pike-San Isabel National Forest into eleven separate Complexes, based on geo-physical characteristics of the land such as mountain ranges, parklands, or canyon systems. Each complex narrative provides details and justifications for our management recommendations for specific areas. In order to emphasize the larger landscape and connectivity of these lands with the ecoregion, commentary on relationships to adjacent non-Forest lands are also included. Evaluations of ecological value across public and private lands are used throughout this chapter. The Colorado Natural Heritage Programs rates the biodiversity of Potential Conservation Areas (PCAs) as General Biodiversity, Moderate, High, Very High, and Outranking Significance. The Nature Conservancy assesses the conservation value of its Conservation Blueprint areas as Low, Moderately Low, Moderate, Moderately High and High. The Southern Rockies Ecosystem Project's Wildlands Network Vision recommends land use designations of Core Wilderness, Core Agency, Low and Moderate Compatible Use, and Wildlife Linkages. Detailed explanations are available from the respective organizations. Complexes – Summary List by Watershed Table 5.1: Summary of WCCP Complexes Watershed Complex Ranger District -
Drainage Basins D R R a F A
EEllbbeerrtt CCoouunnttyy Coommeerrccee Rdd d d R R h h Douglas County a Douglas County a m m rr a a d d D R D R R R t t Fremont C k Fremont P C k r P r w e w W rr e e h a W e a av h E h avy e h y e E s O d d s st rs Oa DD d r k r o d t r a n e r o n relllla ee k Dr a K r n Fort e L K n Fort L B kk e Carpenter n C B Carpenter R n C b R Bald u L b ee u Bald L r S v Plum r v ee Plum l k h i o e k h r i o e l r RAMAH D g rr l l D g l n a l n a d T G G T i h r G d G ok St h r CC o E ro St r B ok i Bro o r t i E t n d d Sundance Mountain d d e n r E p e r E Creek kk p R oo W g E Creek H R g E W ll v Mountain w v H w R u R R M ountain R u r Creek r Creek W EE t W r cc o H i r h t o H i e e a Antelope h n D a d n e i D e p n a d Antelope o n p o e g n a n r r g WW dd e e d g o e e d g T o H R n PLPL0400 e e T l n 8285 l e T H R T g PLPL0400 D g F m PLPL020 0 F West D u e D u m PLPL0200 PLP0600 D e v a West r a r d v t PLP0600 d t m l r a i l r h k S l k l i h rr a m S i l r l i dd g c n d r R w c r amah n E R Rd g i r a E Ramah w o T DD u i a PALMER LAKE o D T amah Rd D E R u G R d k ah R r G d RR am h * R k e E A r n d R o e n A * h oo S S o a n c e a d e n r c d cc r Creek C m r r W ee D C W m D aa s o e Creek R C l s r Ca o e o l t S a h r R t e rr b h r r d e d o b S e p dr D d e p ra D e R M l a l oss a e L R M Rock l D a l oss Rd mm L Dr e Rock Rd u DD r r l s e m a r l s lm t a u l B s r o B aa l t t s r o l t h M lh r P l r M F C S P e e e l e C S g gg a e F l e g a i l n a W Ramah Rd i l n a Rd t o A W Ramah o p t A d r C nn p d r C -
Cogjm.Rmo-604.Pdf (1.625Mb)
RMO- 6~~lV 3m!c -o UNITED STATES DEPART~illNT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY INVESTIGATIONS OF DO~STIC RADIOACTIVE RAW MATERIALS, BERYLLIUM, AND OTHER TRACE ELE~NTS (J PREPARED FOR U. S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION MONTHLY REPORT--NOVEMBER 1951 TRACE ELEMENTS OFFICE C] Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any.oftheir employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed in this report, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference therein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. REPRODUCED FROM BEST AVAILABLE COPY -2- CJ .3 Page SUIDinary .......................................................................... o .......... o o .................. " ~ .......... .. 7 Reconnaissance investigations, domestic .......................................................... .. 9 Property examinations .................................................................................. .. 9 Copper-uranium deposits in sandstones .................................................... .. 9 Relation -
Community Wildfire Protection Plan for Unincorporated El Paso County
Community Wildfire Protection Plan i for Unincorporated El Paso County Community Wildfire Protection Plan for Unincorporated El Paso County “A Continuing Process” El Paso County Sheriff’s Office Emergency Services Division 101 West Costilla Street, Colorado Springs, CO 80903 ii Community Wildfire Protection Plan for Unincorporated El Paso County Contents Acknowledgements........................................................................................................ i Supporting agencies...................................................................................................... ii Fire Departments............................................................................................................................................ ii Forestry and Natural Resources..................................................................................................................... iii Emergency Management............................................................................................................................... iii Land Use and Planning.................................................................................................................................. iii Utilities.......................................................................................................................................................... iii Local Community Wildfire Protection Plans in Unincorporated El Paso County.......................................................................... iv Introduction ................................................................................................................1 -
COLORADO Year in Review 2020 IENDS, R F Sincerely, DEAR How Pandemic Has Shown by a Ned Defi a Year Expected
COLORADO Year in Review 2020 The Nature Conservancy in Colorado BOARD OF TRUSTEES Chair: Stuart Brown Vice Chair: Carol Burt Treasurer: Annette Quintana Bruce Alexander Janelle Blessing Sharon K. Collinge Warren H. Dean Bruce Dines DEAR FRIENDS, Elaine Feeney Ken Gart What a year! I think it’s safe to say that this was not the 2020 anyone expected. A year defi ned by a pandemic has shown how Shannon Gi ord much we rely on science, nature and the outdoors. Urban parks, backyards, local trails, and neighborhood walks provided refuge Terry Hu ngton and an escape during lockdown. Meanwhile, record wildfi res, drought and shocking new science on the world’s biodiversity loss Richard Jorgensen further highlighted the urgency for us to act on climate and conserve nature. Kristin McKissick Art Reimers Despite these diffi cult times, there are still plenty of reasons to feel hopeful. I fi nd hope in our work to help nature and people Greeley Sachs adapt to change, and in the evolving “new normal” in the ways we live, travel, and interact. I fi nd hope in the increasing awareness Cynthia Scott of climate change and the connections between the environment and racial injustice, and the new pressure and enthusiasm we Susan Sturm 2 are seeing—especially from young people—to address these injustices. And I always fi nd hope in watching my daughter explore Suzanne White and learn through all these changes, and seeing her relentless optimism and adaptability carry her through just about anything. Joseph Zell COLORADO YEAR IN REVIEW 2020 COLORADO Here at The Nature Conservancy in Colorado, I also fi nd hope in our passionate and committed team. -
Water and Growth in Colorado: a Review of Legal and Policy Issues
University of Colorado Law School Colorado Law Scholarly Commons Getches-Wilkinson Center for Natural Books, Reports, and Studies Resources, Energy, and the Environment 2001 Water and Growth in Colorado: A Review of Legal and Policy Issues Peter D. Nichols Megan K. Murphy Douglas S. Kenney University of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/books_reports_studies Part of the Public Policy Commons, Water Law Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons Citation Information Peter D. Nichols, Megan K. Murphy & Douglas S. Kenney, Water and Growth in Colorado: A Review of Legal and Policy Issues (Natural Res. Law Ctr., Univ. of Colo. Sch. of Law 2001). PETER D. NICHOLS, MEGAN K. MURPHY & DOUGLAS S. KENNEY, WATER AND GROWTH IN COLORADO: A REVIEW OF LEGAL AND POLICY ISSUES (Natural Res. Law Ctr., Univ. of Colo. Sch. of Law 2001). Reproduced with permission of the Getches-Wilkinson Center for Natural Resources, Energy, and the Environment (formerly the Natural Resources Law Center) at the University of Colorado Law School. WATER AND GROWTH IN COLORADO A REVIEW OF LEGAL AND POLICY ISSUES by Peter D. Nichols, Megan K. Murphy, and Douglas S. Kenney Natural Resources Law Center University of Colorado School of Law © Natural Resources Law Center, University of Colorado School of Law, 2001 The mission of the Natural Resources Law Center is to “promote sustainability in the rapidly changing American West by informing and influencing natural resource laws, policies, and decisions.” Peter D. Nichols, J.D. Megan K. Murphy, J.D. Douglas S. Kenney, Ph.D. -
Air Force Academy Heritage
Air Force Academy Heritage Air Force Academy Heritage $29.95 Air Force Academy Military/History A Heritage HTHE EARLY YEARS AirAir ForceForce AcademyAcademy AA HeritageHeritage The Air Force Academy under construction in the late 1950s (left) and a view of the Academy today (right). THE EARLY YEARS The Academy, with its 18,500 acres, is one of the largest collegiate campuses in the world. HH he need for an air academy began with the first powered flight. About the Author Orville Wright and his brother, Wilbur, launched the age of flight TTon December 17, 1903, at Kitty Hawk, North Carolina. But it wasn’t George V. until April 1, 1954, when President Eisenhower signed the Academy Bill, Fagan that the Air Force Academy became a reality. Brigadier General Brigadier General George V. Fagan tells the story of the history of the USAF (Ret.) Air Force Academy and how it went from just an idea in World War I to Temple University BS 1940, MA 1941 the military educational institution of today. General Fagan is well qualified University of to write such a book, as he was one of the original professors and director of Pennsylvania the Academy Libraries. PhD 1954 The evolution and development of the Air Force Academy over its Serving with distinction as a member of the first fifty-year period has been remarkable. It has become a unique national original cadre, permanent professor of the institution. The true value of an educational institution is reflected in the Academy’s Department of History, and as quality of its graduates. -
Preserve America Grants Summary and Project Descriptions
PRESERVE AMERICA GRANTS SUMMARY AND PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS Note: Though these grants remain authorized, the Congress has not appropriated funding for them since FY 2010. The Preserve America competitive matching-grant program provides funding to designated Preserve America Communities, State Historic Preservation Offices, and Tribal Historic Preservation Offices to support preservation efforts through heritage tourism, education, and historic preservation planning. Administered by the National Park Service in partnership with the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, funded activities include interpretation and education, planning, promotion, training, and research and documentation of cultural and historic resources. Projects are funded between a range of $20,000 and $250,000. Successful projects involve public- private partnerships and require a 50/50 non-federal match. Innovative projects serve as models to communities nationwide for heritage tourism, historic preservation planning, history education, and economic development. From 2006 through 2010: $21.7 million was awarded through 8 competitive rounds to 281 projects in 49 states 721 project proposals were received requesting over $56.5 million Projects were funded in five categories: O Interpretation and Education – 84 projects O Promotion – 77 projects O Planning – 53 projects O Research and Documentation – 53 projects O Training – 14 projects www.PreserveAmerica.gov www.PreserveAmerica.gov ALABAMA Ensley Historic Building Survey and National Register Nomination Birmingham, Alabama $25,000 Tuxedo Junction and Ensley were the birthplace and training ground for many of Alabama’s Jazz, Soul, and R&B legends. This grant will support research that will lead to the nomination of Ensley’s Commercial District and Tuxedo Junction to the National Register of Historic Places, an architectural guide to Ensley’s commercial district, the publication of a history of the cultural and industrial communities of Ensley and Tuxedo Junction, and the establishment of these areas as destination points. -
Blodgett Peak Open Space Master Plan
Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................ 2 Background and History Regional Setting Purpose of the Plan Regional Setting Map ......................................................... 5 Planning Process Trails, Open Space & Parks Vision and Goals .................................................................... 7 Vision Statement Ecological Goals Community Goals Resource Analysis .................................................................. 8 Topography Topography Map ................................................................ 9 Vegetative Zones Vegetative and Wildlife Sensitivity Zones Map ................. 11 Wildlife Site Analysis ......................................................................... 16 Scenic Values Structures Infrastructure, and Accessories Cultural Resources Site Analysis Map ............................................................. 17 Easement and Right-of-Way Information Existing Trails Regional Trail Connections Regional Trail Connections Map....................................... 19 Master Development Plan .................................................... 20 Resource Management Fencing Trailhead along Woodmen Road Trail System Master Development Plan Map ........................................ 25 Trailhead Plan Master Plan Implementation Guidelines ............................. 28 Phasing Recommended Management Plan Issues Interpretation Opportunities Budget Estimates COLORADO SPRINGS PARKS, RECREATION & Appendix ..............................................................................