DOCSLIB.ORG

Technical Note 4

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Technical Note 4 Technical Note 4: Technology Evaluation Disruptive Technology Search for Space Applications 4000101818/10/NL/GLC Issue: 2.0 - Date 07.11.2012 Document Change Record Issue/ Date Affected Pages Description Revision 1.0 23.07.2012 All Draft 2.0 15.11.2012 All Final Version Date: 15.11.2012 Page 2 of 162 Doc.Int.: DST-TN-04 Issue: 2.0 Table of Content Table of Content Table of Content .......................................................................................................................... 3 List of Figures ............................................................................................................................... 9 List of Tables .............................................................................................................................. 10 References .................................................................................................................................. 10 List of Abbreviations ................................................................................................................... 10 Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................... 12 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 17 2 DST Evaluation Methodology ............................................................................................... 18 2.1 DST Evaluation Method ................................................................................................ 19 2.1.1 Desk Research ....................................................................................................... 19 2.1.2 First Delphi Round ................................................................................................. 20 2.1.3 Second Delphi Round ............................................................................................ 20 2.1.4 Third Delphi Round ................................................................................................ 21 2.1.5 Concept Scoring .................................................................................................... 21 2.2 Delphi Questions .......................................................................................................... 21 2.2.1 Social Questions .................................................................................................... 21 2.2.2 Technical Questions ............................................................................................... 22 2.2.3 Economic Questions .............................................................................................. 22 2.2.4 Political Questions ................................................................................................. 23 2.3 Weighting & Scoring ..................................................................................................... 24 2.4 Selection of Experts ...................................................................................................... 24 3 Results ................................................................................................................................ 25 3.1 Presentation of the Results ............................................................................................ 25 3.2 Analysis of the Results .................................................................................................. 26 3.3 Assessment of the Evaluation Process and Recommendations ........................................ 27 Annex 1: Technology Fact Sheets ................................................................................................ 28 1 Materials ............................................................................................................................ 28 1.1 Cathodic Arc Application of Amorphous Boron Coatings ............................................... 28 Date: 15.11.2012 Page 3 of 162 Doc.Int.: DST-TN-04 Issue: 2.0 Table of Content 1.2 Ceramic Composite Structures ...................................................................................... 31 1.3 Highly Conducting Graphite Epoxy Composite ............................................................... 34 1.4 Metallic Microlattice ..................................................................................................... 36 1.5 Nanocrystalline diamond Aerogel .................................................................................. 39 2 Data Handling ..................................................................................................................... 41 2.1 Chalcogenide-Based Reconfigurable Memory Electronics ............................................... 41 2.2 Holographic Data Storage ............................................................................................. 44 2.3 Multicarrier signals........................................................................................................ 47 2.4 Light slowing Metamaterials ......................................................................................... 49 3 Propulsion .......................................................................................................................... 52 3.1 Ceramic Combustion chamber concept based on transpiration cooling .......................... 52 3.2 Aerospike engine .......................................................................................................... 54 3.3 Nanoparticle Field Extraction Thruster (NanoFET) ............................................................ 56 3.4 Magnetoplasmadynamic thruster (MPDT) ...................................................................... 59 3.5 Alternative Solid Propellants: CL-20 ............................................................................... 62 4 Power ................................................................................................................................. 65 4.1 Aluminum-Celmet for Lithium-Ion Batteries ................................................................... 65 4.2 Super-/ Ultracapacitors .................................................................................................. 67 4.3 Bacterial Nanowires ...................................................................................................... 70 4.4 UltraFlex Solar Panels .................................................................................................... 72 4.5 Silicon Nanowire Lithium-Ion Battery ............................................................................. 74 4.6 Quantum-Dot Solar Cell ................................................................................................ 76 Annex 2: Delphi Results .............................................................................................................. 79 1 General Notes / Table legends ............................................................................................. 79 2 Materials ............................................................................................................................ 80 2.1 Cathodic arc application of amorphous boron coatings (CAAABC) ................................. 80 2.1.1 Technology description .......................................................................................... 80 2.1.2 Social, Economic and Political (SEP) questions ......................................................... 81 2.1.3 Technical questions (performance attributes) .......................................................... 82 2.1.3.1 Selection of attributes (1st round) .................................................................... 82 Date: 15.11.2012 Page 4 of 162 Doc.Int.: DST-TN-04 Issue: 2.0 Table of Content 2.1.3.2 Rating (2nd & 3rd round) ................................................................................... 82 2.1.3.3 Weighting (2nd & 3rd round) ............................................................................. 83 2.2 Ceramic composite structures ....................................................................................... 83 2.2.1 Technology description .......................................................................................... 83 2.2.2 Social, Economic and Political (SEP) questions ......................................................... 84 2.2.3 Technical questions (performance attributes) .......................................................... 86 2.2.3.1 Selection of attributes (1st round) .................................................................... 86 2.2.3.2 Rating (2nd & 3rd round) ................................................................................... 86 2.2.3.3 Weighting (2nd & 3rd round) ............................................................................. 87 2.3 Graphite epoxy composites ........................................................................................... 87 2.3.1 Technology description .......................................................................................... 87 2.3.2 Social, Economic and Political (SEP) questions ......................................................... 88 2.3.3 Technical questions (performance attributes) .......................................................... 89 2.3.3.1 Selection of attributes (1st round) .................................................................... 89 2.3.3.2 Rating (2nd & 3rd round) ..................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA, IRVINE Ultralight Microlattice
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, IRVINE Ultralight Microlattice Materials with Unique Combination of Stiffness and Damping DISSERTATION submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering by Ladan Salari Sharif Dissertation Committee: Professor Lorenzo Valdevit, Chair Professor Timothy Rupert Professor Lizhi Sun 2016 © 2016 Ladan Salari Sharif DEDICATION To my mom and dad who taught me to be strong and empowered me with the courage to follow my dreams. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List of Figures……………...……………………………………………………………………vi List of Tables…………………………………………..………………………………………..xv Acknowledgments……………………………………..……………...………………………..xvi Curriculum Vitae………………………………………………………………………...…...xviii Abstract of the Dissertation…………………………………………………………...….……xxi CHAPTER1 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………..…..1 CHAPTER2 Approach………………………………………………………………………………………..10 CHAPTER 3 Fabrication Process……………………………………………………………………………..13 3.1 Hollow nickel microlattices ........................................................................................... 13 3.2 Hollow hybrid microlattices ........................................................................................... 15 CHAPTER 4 Stiffness Measurements of Ultralight Hollow Metallic Microlattices..………………………...19 4.1 Experimental approach ................................................................................................... 19 4.2 Young’s modulus calculation ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Mechanics Density
    Quantum Mechanics_Density Density Common symbols ρ 3 SI unit kg/m A graduated cylinder containing various coloured liquids with different densities. The density, or more precisely, the volumetric mass density, of a substance is its mass per unit volume. The symbol most often used for density is ρ (the lower case Greek letter rho). Mathematically, density is defined as mass divided by volume:[1] where ρ is the density, m is the mass, and V is the volume. In some cases (for instance, in the United States oil and gas industry), density is loosely defined as itsweight per unit volume,[2] although this is scientifically inaccurate – this quantity is more specifically called specific weight. For a pure substance the density has the same numerical value as its mass concentration. Different materials usually have different densities, and density may be relevant to buoyancy, purity and packaging. Osmium and iridium are the densest known elements at standard conditions for temperature and pressurebut certain chemical compounds may be denser. To simplify comparisons of density across different systems of units, it is sometimes replaced by the dimensionless quantity "relative density" or "specific gravity", i.e. the ratio of the density of the material to that of a standard material, usually water. Thus a relative density less than one means that the substance floats in water. The density of a material varies with temperature and pressure. This variation is typically small for solids and liquids but much greater for gases. Increasing the pressure on an object decreases the volume of the object and thus increases its density.
    [Show full text]
  • Metallic Microlattice Materials: a Current State of the Art on Manufacturing, Mechanical Properties and Applications
    ÔØ ÅÒÙ×Ö ÔØ Metallic microlattice materials: A current state of the art on manufacturing, mechanical properties and applications M.G. Rashed, Mahmud Ashraf, R.A.W. Mines, Paul J. Hazell PII: S0264-1275(16)30144-7 DOI: doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.146 Reference: JMADE 1347 To appear in: Received date: 12 November 2015 Revised date: 28 January 2016 Accepted date: 30 January 2016 Please cite this article as: M.G. Rashed, Mahmud Ashraf, R.A.W. Mines, Paul J. Hazell, Metallic microlattice materials: A current state of the art on manufacturing, mechanical properties and applications, (2016), doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.146 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Metallic Microlattice Materials: A Current State of The Art on Manufacturing, Mechanical Properties and Applications By M. G. Rashed a, Mahmud Ashraf a,*, R. A. W. Mines b and Paul J. Hazell a [a] M. G. Rashed, Mahmud Ashraf, Paul J. Hazell School of Engineering and Information Technology, The University of New South Wales, Canberra, ACT 2610, Australia [b] R. A. W. Mines School of Engineering, The University of Liverpool, The Quadrangle, Liverpool, L69 3GH, UK Abstract Metallic microlattice is a new class of material that combines useful mechanical properties of metals with smart geometrical orientations providing greater stiffness, strength-to-weight ratio and good energy absorption capacity than other types of cellular materials used in sandwich construction such as honeycomb, folded and foam.
    [Show full text]
  • Amazing New Materials and Their Future Uses
    AMAZING NEW MATERIALS AND THEIR FUTURE USES COMPILED BY HOWIE BAUM AN INTRODUCTION TO THE DIFFERENT TYPES OF MATERIALS • Materials used in the design and manufacture of products • Plastics • Wood • Composites • Ceramics • Metals • Fabrics Linen,LayersTungstenBalsaSteel, cotton, ofAcrylic polycarbonate, wood carbidealuminium nylon,lens model tool Kevlar bit aluminium & acrylic Classification of Materials (Metals) •Metals can be further classified as Non- Ferrous (without iron) (shown first) and Ferrous (with iron) HighStainlessAluminium CopperSpeedBrass Steel steel Ferrous Non-Ferrous Steels Aluminium Stainless Steels Copper High Speed Steels Brass (Copper & Zinc) Cast Irons Titanium Stainless Steel Steel is alloyed with chromium (18%) and nickel (8%) (which is why sometimes, it is called 18-8 stainless steel. It won’t rust because of the outer layer of Chromium oxide ! Hard and tough Corrosion resistant Comes in different grades Sinks, cooking utensils, surgical instruments The most popular form is Type 304 stainless steel. 6 The 630-foot high, stainless-clad (type 304) Gateway Arch defines St. Louis's skyline. “CLOUD GATE” aka THE BEAN, IN CHICAGO It is made up of 168 stainless steel plates (Type 304) welded together and its highly polished exterior has no visible seams. It measures 33 by 66 by 42 feet (10 by 20 by 13 meters) and weighs 110 tons !! The outside skin of the DeLorean car (Back to the Future model shown) was also made of Type 304 stainless steel !! The operating flux capacitor from the DeLorean used in the movies “Back to the Future” !! NON-FERROUS METALS MOST METAL ZIPPERS ARE MADE OF ALUMINUM !! EXTRUSION OF ALUMINUM AND OTHER METALS Extrusion is a manufacturing process where a material, often in the form of a billet, is heated to about 900 degrees F and then it’s pushed and/or drawn through a die to create long objects of a fixed cross-section.
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Textiles and Nanotechnology (January 2015)
    the news service for textile futures Smart Materials In this issue SMART MATERIALS Architected Lattice—the new wonder material 1 WEARABLE TECHNOLOGY New device for treating psoriasis 3 Sensors provide biometric identity 4 Enter The Dash 6 Textile sensors for comfortable spinal braces 7 Architected Lattice—the Three-dimensional printed arrays bound for space 7 new wonder material University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) and Architected Materials are working to exploit an extraordinary new energy- absorbing material. Among other uses, it could replace the foam padding in sports helmets and at the same time detect and transmit valuable data about the impact of a head injury. Industry 4.0 at BMW 10 They have received a US$500 000 research grant and are eligible to receive up to Two-year battery life with Assure 12 $8.5 million in additional funding as one of the winners of the Head Health Challenge II . This open innovation competition is being run by sports performance brand Under NANOFIBRES Armour, working with the US National Football League (NFL) and General Electric to Nanocellulose products partnership 3 accelerate the development of new products Muscle monitoring in space at Ohmatex 4 for brain injury prevention, as part of a $40- million programme launched in March 2013. LIGHT-EMITTING DIODE TECHNOLOGY “Each of these seven winners will help Energizing the intensive care room 6 advance the science towards our shared goal SMART FABRICS of making sports safer,” says NFL Protection for solar panels 8 Commissioner Roger Goodell. “New materials, equipment designs and technology RECYCLING breakthroughs will better protect athletes, Potential with liquid lay-down 8 no matter what sport they play.” Of the 1.7 million traumatic brain injuries NANOTECHNOLOGY in the United States each year, more than FX improves FibeRio reach 9 750 000 are considered ‘mild’, and over Graphene for composites 9 173 000 are related to recreational and EVENTS sports activity.
    [Show full text]
  • In-Situ Mechanics of 3D Graphene Foam Based Ultra-Stiff and Flexible
    Carbon 137 (2018) 502e510 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Carbon journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/carbon In-situ mechanics of 3D graphene foam based ultra-stiff and flexible metallic metamaterial * Pranjal Nautiyal a, Mubarak Mujawar b, Benjamin Boesl a, Arvind Agarwal a, a Nanomechanics and Nanotribology Laboratory, Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Florida International University, 10555 West Flagler Street, Miami, FL 33174, USA b Advanced Materials Engineering Research Institute, Florida International University, 10555 West Flagler Street, Miami, FL 33174, USA article info abstract Article history: A 3D macroporous graphene foam based ultra-lightweight, stiff and fatigue-resistant mechanical met- Received 7 April 2018 amaterial is developed in this study. In-situ indentation of the 3D graphene framework reveals an Received in revised form extraordinary spring constant of ~15 N/m and an upward of 70% recoverable deformation. The brilliant 19 May 2018 stiffness and superelasticity of graphene foam is exploited to fabricate Aluminum-based Graphene/Metal Accepted 28 May 2018 Metamaterial by electron beam evaporation. In-situ cyclic indentation inside SEM up to 50 cycles Available online 29 May 2018 revealed long-distance stress-transfer due to the interconnected network of branches, having spring-like mechanical energy storage ability. The structure is highly fatigue-resistant, with more than 98% of displacement recovery at the end of each loading/unloading cycle. In-situ tensile investigation reveals shearing-type failure with dual-strengthening mechanisms, where stress transfer from Aluminum layer to graphene scaffold enhances the overall load bearing ability and the Aluminum deposit on graphene foam provides a structural backbone that restricts brittle failure.
    [Show full text]
  • A Data-Driven Study
    Additive Manufacturing 19 (2018) 51–61 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Additive Manufacturing jou rnal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/addma Full Length Article The effect of manufacturing defects on compressive strength of ultralight hollow microlattices: A data-driven study a,c b c a,∗ L. Salari-Sharif , S.W. Godfrey , M. Tootkaboni , L. Valdevit a Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department, University of California, Irvine, United States b Computer Science Department, University of California, Irvine, United States c Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, University of Massachusetts, Dartmouth, United States a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Hollow microlattices constitute a model topology for architected materials, as they combine excellent Received 24 December 2016 specific stiffness and strength with relative ease of manufacturing. The most scalable manufacturing Received in revised form 8 October 2017 technique to date encompasses fabrication of a sacrificial polymeric template by the Self Propagating Accepted 2 November 2017 Photopolymer Waveguide (SPPW) process, followed by thin film coating and removal of the sub- Available online 8 November 2017 strate. Accurate modeling of mechanical properties (e.g., stiffness, strength) of hollow microlattices is challenging, primarily due to the complex stress state around the hollow nodes and the existence of Keywords: manufacturing-induced geometric imperfections (e.g. cracks, non-circularity, etc.). In this work, we use Ultralight microlattice a variety of measuring techniques (SEM imaging, CT scanning, etc.) to characterize the geometric imper- Manufacturing defects fections in a nickel-based ultralight hollow microlattice and investigate their effect on the compressive Compressive strength Geometric imperfections strength of the lattice.
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanical Metamaterials Associated With
    Progress in Materials Science 94 (2018) 114–173 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Progress in Materials Science journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/pmatsci Mechanical metamaterials associated with stiffness, rigidity and compressibility: A brief review ⇑ Xianglong Yu a,b, Ji Zhou a, , Haiyi Liang b, Zhengyi Jiang c, Lingling Wu a a State Key Laboratory of New Ceramics and Fine Processing, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China b CAS Key Laboratory of Mechanical Behavior and Design of Materials, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, Anhui, China c School of Mechanical, Materials and Mechatronic Engineering, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia article info abstract Article history: Mechanical metamaterials are man-made structures with counterintuitive mechanical Received 10 November 2015 properties that originate in the geometry of their unit cell instead of the properties of each Received in revised form 3 December 2017 component. The typical mechanical metamaterials are generally associated with the four Accepted 20 December 2017 elastic constants, the Young’s modulus E, shear modulus G, bulk modulus K and Available online 21 December 2017 Poisson’s ratio t, the former three of which correspond to the stiffness, rigidity, and com- pressibility of a material from an engineering point of view. Here we review the important Keywords: advancements in structural topology optimisation of the underlying design principles, cou- Mechanical metamaterials pled with experimental fabrication, thereby to obtain various counterintuitive mechanical Microlattice Tunable stiffness properties. Further, a clear classification of mechanical metamaterials have been estab- Negative compressibility lished based on the fundamental material mechanics.
    [Show full text]