DOCSLIB.ORG

Capital District Transportation Committee TRANSPORTATION

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Capital District Transportation Committee TRANSPORTATION Capital District Transportation Committee TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP) 2013-18 June 6, 2013 This Capital District Transportation Committee (CDTC) report was prepared in cooperation with local governments, regional agencies, New York State agencies, and the Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration of the United States Department of Transportation. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of these governmental agencies. TABLE OF CONTENTS Resolution #13-2 - Resolution of Capital District Transportation Committee Regarding Self-Certification .................................................................................................................... i Resolution #13-3 - Resolution of the Capital District Transportation Committee Endorsing the Transportation Improvement Program ........................................................................... iii SECTION I - NARRATIVES ................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW .............................................................................................................. 3 Overview of the Capital District Transportation Committee .......................................................................... 3 Overview of the Transportation Improvement Program ................................................................................. 3 THE NEW YORK STATE DOT FORWARD FOUR INITIATIVE ................................................................. 5 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 5 Principal One: Preservation First .................................................................................................................... 5 Principal Two: System Not Projects ............................................................................................................... 5 Principal Three: Maximize Return on Investment .......................................................................................... 5 Principal Four: Make It Sustainable ............................................................................................................... 6 Strategies and Priorities .................................................................................................................................. 6 MAP-21 .............................................................................................................................................................. 7 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 7 Fund Sources .................................................................................................................................................. 7 Performance Management .............................................................................................................................. 9 2013-18 TIP UPDATE ..................................................................................................................................... 11 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 11 Estimation of Available Funds ..................................................................................................................... 11 Preservation First Projects ............................................................................................................................ 12 Beyond Preservation Projects ....................................................................................................................... 12 Year of Expenditure and the TIP .................................................................................................................. 13 PROGRAMMING PROJECTS IN THE 2013-18 TIP ..................................................................................... 15 Overview ...................................................................................................................................................... 15 Projects in the 2010-15 TIP .......................................................................................................................... 15 Transit Fund Sources .................................................................................................................................... 19 Preservation First Projects ............................................................................................................................ 19 Statewide Prioritization Program .................................................................................................................. 20 Beyond Preservation Projects Programmed by CDTC ................................................................................. 21 STEP Projects ............................................................................................................................................... 21 Types of Regional Set-Asides ...................................................................................................................... 22 ADDITION OF NEW PROJECTS IN PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT .......................................................... 25 RECREATIONAL TRAILS PROJECTS......................................................................................................... 27 LOCAL ADVANCEMENT OF PROJECTS ................................................................................................... 29 FINANCING AGREEMENT FOR ALBANY-SHAKER ROAD AND WATERVLIET-SHAKER ROAD PROJECTS ........................................................................................................................................... 31 Background .................................................................................................................................................. 31 TIP Programming of Albany Shaker Road and Watervliet Shaker Road Projects ....................................... 31 Exploration of Alternative Funding Methods ............................................................................................... 32 The CDTC-NYSDOT-County-Town TIP Agreement ................................................................................. 32 Distribution of Mitigation Fees to the Albany Shaker Road And Watervliet Shaker Road Projects ........... 33 ENHANCEMENT PROJECTS ........................................................................................................................ 35 Transportation Enhancements Program ........................................................................................................ 35 "Second Chance" Enhancements Program ................................................................................................... 36 Enhancement-Type Projects Funded with Flexible Funds ........................................................................... 36 SPOT IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS .............................................................................................................. 39 Spot Improvement Program Introduction ..................................................................................................... 39 NEW VISIONS AND THE TIP ......................................................................................................................... 43 The New Visions Regional Plan ................................................................................................................... 43 Programming Principles ............................................................................................................................... 44 PROJECT SELECTION FROM, AND AMENDING, THE TIP ..................................................................... 49 PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING FOR PUBLIC TRANSIT & HUMAN SERVICES TRANSPORTATION ...................................................................................................................................... 51 Introduction and Overview ........................................................................................................................... 51 Ongoing Initiatives ....................................................................................................................................... 55 REGIONAL EMISSIONS IMPACT OF THE CDTC TIP .............................................................................. 57 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 57 Attainment/Non-Attainment Status .............................................................................................................. 57 Methodology Used to Model the Emission Impacts of the TIP and New Visions ........................................ 57 Air Quality Impacts of the TIP and the New Visions Plan ............................................................................ 58 ENERGY CONSUMPTION IMPACTS OF THE PROJECTS CONTAINED IN CDTC'S TIP ..................... 61 The Role of Transportation Planning in Reducing Energy Consumption in the Capital District ................. 61 CIVIL RIGHTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ..................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hudson River Watershed 2002 Water Quality Assessment Report
    HUDSON RIVER WATERSHED 2002 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT REPORT COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS ROBERT W. GOLLEDGE, JR, SECRETARY MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ARLEEN O’DONNELL, ACTING COMMISSIONER BUREAU OF RESOURCE PROTECTION GLENN HAAS, ACTING ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DIVISION OF WATERSHED MANAGEMENT GLENN HAAS, DIRECTOR NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY LIMITED COPIES OF THIS REPORT ARE AVAILABLE AT NO COST BY WRITTEN REQUEST TO: MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION OF WATERSHED MANAGEMENT 627 MAIN STREET WORCESTER, MA 01608 This report is also available from the MassDEP’s home page on the World Wide Web at: http://www.mass.gov/dep/water/resources/wqassess.htm Furthermore, at the time of first printing, eight copies of each report published by this office are submitted to the State Library at the State House in Boston; these copies are subsequently distributed as follows: · On shelf; retained at the State Library (two copies); · Microfilmed retained at the State Library; · Delivered to the Boston Public Library at Copley Square; · Delivered to the Worcester Public Library; · Delivered to the Springfield Public Library; · Delivered to the University Library at UMass, Amherst; · Delivered to the Library of Congress in Washington, D.C. Moreover, this wide circulation is augmented by inter-library loans from the above-listed libraries. For example a resident in Marlborough can apply at their local library for loan of any MassDEP/DWM report from the Worcester Public Library. A complete list of reports published since 1963 is updated annually and printed in July. This report, entitled, “Publications of the Massachusetts Division of Watershed Management – Watershed Planning Program, 1963-(current year)”, is also available by writing to the Division of Watershed Management (DWM) in Worcester.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridges in Albany County
    CDTC BRIDGE FACT SHEET BIN 1053380 Bridge Name 5 X over PATROON CREEK Review Date October 2014 GENERAL INFORMATION PIN County Albany Political Unit City of ALBANY Owner 42 - City of ALBANY Feature Carried 5 X Feature Crossed PATROON CREEK Federal System? Yes NHS? Yes BRIDGE INFORMATION Number of Spans 2 Superstructure Type Concrete Culvert At Risk? No AADT 26918 AADT Year 2010 Posted Load (Tons) INSPECTION INFORMATION Last Inspection 8/14/2012 Condition Rating 5.316 Flags NNN No Flags STUDY INFORMATION Work Strategy Item Specific Treatment 1 Concrete Patch Repairs Treatment 2 2014 Preliminary Construction Cost $100,000 MP&T Open Program (years) 10 Comments CDTC BRIDGE FACT SHEET BIN 2200130 Bridge Name KAEHLER LANE over FOX CREEK Review Date October 2014 GENERAL INFORMATION PIN County Albany Political Unit Town of BERNE Owner 40 - Town of BERNE Feature Carried KAEHLER LANE Feature Crossed FOX CREEK Federal System? No NHS? No BRIDGE INFORMATION Number of Spans 1 Superstructure Type Steel Stringer / Multibeam At Risk? Yes AADT 15 AADT Year 2009 Posted Load (Tons) INSPECTION INFORMATION Last Inspection 11/15/2012 Condition Rating 5.404 Flags NNN No Flags STUDY INFORMATION Work Strategy Item Specific Treatment 1 Place Asphalt WS Treatment 2 Repair Lagging Wall 2014 Preliminary Construction Cost $300,000 MP&T Detour Program (years) Immediate Comments CDTC BRIDGE FACT SHEET BIN 2200210 Bridge Name PICTUAY ROAD over COEYMANS CREEK Review Date October 2014 GENERAL INFORMATION PIN County Albany Political Unit Town of BETHLEHEM Owner 30 - Albany
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogeology of the Schodack-Kinderhook Area, Rensselaer and Columbia Counties, New York
    Hydrogeology of the Schodack-Kinderhook Area, Rensselaer and Columbia Counties, New York U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 97-639 Prepared in cooperation with NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION Cover: View of Moordener Kill from State Rt. 150 in Brookview, N.Y., looking west (downstream). Note exposed bedrock in streambed. (Photo by R.J. Reynolds, 1999). Hydrogeology of the Schodack-Kinderhook Area, Rensselaer and Columbia Counties, New York By Richard J. Reynolds ______________________________________________________________ U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 97-639 Prepared in cooperation with the NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION science for a changing world Troy, New York 1999 i U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Charles G. Groat, Director ______________________________________________________________________ For additional information Copies of this report may be write to: purchased from: U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey 425 Jordan Road Branch of Information Services Troy, NY 12180-8349 P.O. Box 25286 Denver, CO 80225 ii CONTENTS Abstract ................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose and Scope .........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Ddt, Chlordane, and Total Pcb's in Bed Sediments in the Hudson River Basin
    NYES&E, Vol. 3, No. 1, Spring 1997 DISTRIBUTION OF DDT, CHLORDANE, AND TOTAL PCB'S IN BED SEDIMENTS IN THE HUDSON RIVER BASIN Patrick J. Phillips1, Karen Riva-Murray1, Hannah M. Hollister2, and Elizabeth A. Flanary1. 1U.S. Geological Survey, 425 Jordan Road, Troy NY 12180. 2Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Troy NY 12180. Abstract Data from streambed-sediment samples collected from 45 sites in the Hudson River Basin and analyzed for organochlorine compounds indicate that residues of DDT, chlordane, and PCB's can be detected even though use of these compounds has been banned for 10 or more years. Previous studies indicate that DDT and chlordane were widely used in a variety of land use settings in the basin, whereas PCB's were introduced into Hudson and Mohawk Rivers mostly as point discharges at a few locations. Detection limits for DDT and chlordane residues in this study were generally 1 µg/kg, and that for total PCB's was 50 µg/kg. Some form of DDT was detected in more than 60 percent of the samples, and some form of chlordane was found in about 30 percent; PCB's were found in about 33 percent of the samples. Median concentrations for p,p’- DDE (the DDT residue with the highest concentration) were highest in samples from sites representing urban areas (median concentration 5.3 µg/kg) and lower in samples from sites in large watersheds (1.25 µg/kg) and at sites in nonurban watersheds. (Urban watershed were defined as those with a population density of more than 60/km2; nonurban watersheds as those with a population density of less than 60/km2, and large watersheds as those encompassing more than 1,300 km2.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Resilience Education in the Hudson River Estuary: Needs Assessment and Program Evaluation
    NEW YORK STATE WATER RESOURCES INSTITUTE Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences 1123 Bradfield Hall, Cornell University Tel: (607) 255-3034 Ithaca, NY 14853-1901 Fax: (607) 255-2016 http://wri.eas.cornell.edu Email: [email protected] Flood Resilience Education in the Hudson River Estuary: Needs Assessment and Program Evaluation Shorna Allred Department of Natural Resources (607) 255-2149 [email protected] Gretchen Gary Department of Natural Resources (607) 269-7859 [email protected] Catskill Creek at Woodstock Dam during low flow (L) and flood conditions (R) Photo Credit - Elizabeth LoGiudice Abstract In recent decades, very heavy rain events (the heaviest 1% of all rain events from 1958-2012) have increased in frequency by 71% in the Northeast U.S. As flooding increases, so does the need for flood control Decisions related to flood control are the responsibility of many individuals and groups across the spectrum of a community, such as local planners, highway departments, and private landowners. Such decisions include strategies to minimize future Flood Resilience Education in the Hudson River Estuary: Needs Assessment and Program Evaluation flooding impacts while also properly responding to storm impacts to streams and adjacent and associated infrastructure. This project had three main components: 1) a flood education needs assessment of local municipal officials (2013), 2) an evaluation of a flood education program for highway personnel (2013), and 3) a survey of riparian landowners (2014). The riparian landowner needs assessment determined that the majority of riparian landowners in the region have experienced flooding, yet few are actually engaging in stream management to mitigate flood issues on their land.
    [Show full text]
  • Chittenden Falls Hydroelectric Project FERC Project No
    ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR HYDROPOWER LICENSE Chittenden Falls Hydroelectric Project FERC Project No. 3273-024 New York Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Office of Energy Projects Division of Hydropower Licensing 888 First Street, NE Washington, D.C. 20426 January 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................... xii LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................ xiii ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................... xiv 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Application .................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose of Action and Need For Power ........................................................ 2 1.2.1 Purpose of Action ............................................................................ 2 1.2.2 Need for Power ................................................................................ 4 1.3 Statutory and Regulatory Requirements ....................................................... 4 1.4 Public Review and Comment ........................................................................ 4 1.4.1 Scoping ............................................................................................ 4 1.4.2 Interventions ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2019 Trout Stocking Summary
    Mill Creek East Greenbush 440 April Brown Trout 8 - 9 inches SPRING 2019 TROUT STOCKING SUMMARY Poesten Kill Brunswick 2570 April Brown Trout 8 - 9 inches Albany, Columbia, Rensselaer, Saratoga and Schenectady County Poesten Kill Brunswick 200 April Brown Trout 12 -15 inches Poesten Kill Brunswick 1420 May Brown Trout 8 - 9 inches WATER TOWN NUMBER DATE SPECIES SIZE Poesten Kill Poestenkill 300 April Brown Trout 12 -15 inches Poesten Kill Poestenkill 1560 April Brown Trout 8 - 9 inches Albany County Poesten Kill Poestenkill 270 May Brown Trout 8 - 9 inches Basic Creek Westerlo 440 April Brown Trout 8 - 9 inches Poesten Kill Poestenkill 710 May - June Brown Trout 8 - 9 inches Catskill Creek Rensselaerville 750 April Brown Trout 8 - 9 inches Second Pond Grafton 440 June Brown Trout 8.5 - 9.5 inches Catskill Creek Rensselaerville 180 May Brown Trout 8 - 9 inches Shaver Pond Grafton 600 Spring Rainbow Trout 8.5 - 9.5 inches Hannacrois Creek Coeymans 125 April Brown Trout 12 -15 inches Tackawasick Creek Nassau 100 April Brown Trout 12 -15 inches Hannacrois Creek Coeymans 1060 April Brown Trout 8 - 9 inches Tackawasick Creek Nassau 800 April Brown Trout 8 - 9 inches Hannacrois Creek Coeymans 710 May - June Brown Trout 8 - 9 inches Tackawasick Creek Nassau 530 May - June Brown Trout 8 - 9 inches Lisha Kill Colonie 350 March - April Brown Trout 8 - 9 inches Town Park Pond East Greenbush 500 April - May Rainbow Trout 8.5 - 9.5 inches Onesquethaw Creek New Scotland 1150 April Brown Trout 8 - 9 inches Walloomsac River Hoosick 500 April Brown Trout
    [Show full text]
  • Capital District Transportation Committee
    SECTION IV - APPENDICIES 133 2016-21 TIP Appendix A - Transit Project Details APPENDIX A - TRANSIT PROJECT DETAILS Millions of Dollars (Values in Parentheses are Quantities) 2015-16 Project Description (Committed) 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 T6B STAR Buses: STAR Buses (#) .400(5) 0.400(5) 0.200(3) 0.400(5) 0.200(3) 0.400(5) T11 Passenger Facility Improvements: Bus Shelters .235 .114 .200 .190 .190 .200 Bus Signs .010 .010 Total .235 .114 .200 .200 .200 .200 T17 Transit Vehicles (Bus Replacement): Transit Buses (#) 3.390 (7) 5.290 (10) 5.488 (11) 5.438 (11) 5.787 (12) 5.732(11) T77 Capital Cost of Contracting for Commuter Service: Computer Service .600 .600 .600 .600 .600 .600 Total .600 .600 .600 .600 .600 .600 A-1 2016-21 TIP Appendix B - Glossary APPENDIX B - GLOSSARY Names and Titles ACAA Albany County Airport Authority ANCA Adirondack North Country Association ARRA American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 ATMS Advanced Traffic Management System (a.k.a. ITS) BRT Bus Rapid Transit CDRPC Capital District Regional Planning Commission CDTA Capital District Transportation Authority CDTC Capital District Transportation Committee FAST Act Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act FHWA Federal Highway Administration FTA Federal Transit Administration HBRR Highway Bridge Rehabilitation and Replacement ISTEA Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 ITS Intelligent Transportation Systems IVHS Intelligent Vehicle Highway Systems (a.k.a. ITS) MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act MPO Metropolitan
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Impacts Associated with Preferred Alternatives
    Champlain Hudson Power Express Project Assessment of Environmental Impacts Associated with Preferred Alternatives Appendix G TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.1 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Background ......................................................................................................... 1 1.1.2 Construction Methods ......................................................................................... 4 1.2 PUTNAM STATION PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE ............................................ 4 1.2.1 Land Use ............................................................................................................. 5 1.2.2 Vegetation and Natural Communities ................................................................. 9 1.2.3 Wetlands and Water Resources .......................................................................... 9 1.2.4 Historic and Archaeological Resources ............................................................ 10 1.2.5 Conclusions ....................................................................................................... 11 1.3 FORT ANN PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE .......................................................... 11 1.3.1 Land Use ........................................................................................................... 13 1.3.2 Vegetation and Natural Communities ............................................................... 15 1.3.3 Wetlands and Water Resources .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Land Use Plan May 1994
    i l I j Town of New Scotland It1 ALBANY COUNTY i NEW YORK MAY 1994 7 lttT c 1 i O pE 21E 1VE L 1J I f11 Cre mr 011 r LtL r LJUx II X 5 51ftIi 11 X t Ii qHIF RJCE oIf1 O fME fJ5ilL 1MP5tCT rA f i STZtPE ME J rr I t prepared by the Town of New Scotland PlanningBoard iJ f l v t i J I I j t jJ i I A J Town of New Scotland BUILDING ZONING DEPARTMENT If C Ill PAUL M CANTLIN C C A 11II BUILDING INSPECTOR W F ZONING ADMINISTRATOR TOWN AlL If SLlNGERLANDS N Y 12159 518 765 3356 I i t c iijS Town of New ScotlaDd J Town Board Herbert Reilly Jr Supervisor Edward Donohue Councilman Richard Decker Councilman Scott Houghtaling Councilman Victoria Ramundo Councilman Corinne Cossac Town Clerk John T Biscone Town Attorney Town P1Al1lling Board Robert Stapf Chairman and Member Annick Belleville Member Raymond G MacKay Jr Member John Loucks Member William Childs Member Ann Dieckman Member Robert Smith Member L Michael Mackey Planning Board Attorney Zoning Board of Appeals jO George Miller Chairman and Member Frederic Carl Member Albert Dankert Member Ronnie Von Ronne Member Judith Wing Member Other Town Ofllces Michael Hotaling Highway Superintendent Kenneth Connolly Town Justice Tom Dolin Town Justice Paul Cantlin Building Inspector Paul Jeffers Code Enforcement Inspector Marily Holmberg Tax Collector Previous Contributing Town and pIAnnfng Board Memebers Wyman Osterhout Councilman John Sgarlata Councilman Peter VanZetten Councilman Craig Schufelt Councilman Robert G Hampston Planning Board Chair Samuel Stein Planning Board Member Ann Richards Planning
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality in the Hudson River Basin New York and Adjacent States, 1992–95
    science for a changing world Water Quality in the Hudson River Basin New York and Adjacent States, 1992–95 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1165 A COORDINATED EFFORT Coordination among agencies and organizations is an integral part of the NAWQA Program. We thank the following individuals and organizations who contributed data, knowledge, time, and expertise. Steven Anderson, Montgomery American Museum of Natural History New York Sea Grant County Soil Conservation District Cornell University New York State Canal Corporation Robert W. Bode, Margaret A. Novak, Cornell University Cooperative New York State Department of Environ- and Lawrence E. Abele, New York Extension mental Conservation State Department of Environmen- Freshwater Institute at Rensselaer New York State Department of Health tal Conservation (NYSDEC) Divi- Polytechnic Institute New York State Department of State sion of Water, Stream General Electric Company Coastal Resource Management Biomonitoring Unit Hudsonia New York State Geological Survey Richard Bopp, Rensselaer Polytech- nic Institute, Department of Earth Hudson River-Black River Regulating New York State Museum and Environmental Sciences District Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Robert Crowe and other landowners Hudson River Foundation River Watch Network, Inc. who permitted access to stream Hudson River National Estuarine Simon’s Rock College and well sites on private property Research Reserve State University of New York at Albany Robert A. Daniels, New York State Hudson Valley Regional Council Suffolk County, N.Y. Museum, Biological Survey Institute of Ecosystem Studies Thatcher Research Associates, Inc. Larry Rosenmann, NYSDEC Divi- New York Botanical Garden The Nature Conservancy sion of Pesticides and Radiation New York City Department of Environ- U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Ulster Orange Greene Dutchess Albany Columbia Schoharie
    Barriers to Migratory Fish in the Hudson River Estuary Watershed, New York State Minden Glen Hoosick Florida Canajoharie Glenville Halfmoon Pittstown S a r a t o g a Schaghticoke Clifton Park Root Charleston S c h e n e c t a d y Rotterdam Frost Pond Dam Waterford Schenectady Zeno Farm Pond Dam Niskayuna Cherry Valley M o n t g o m e r y Duanesburg Reservoir Dam Princetown Fessenden Pond Dam Long Pond Dam Shaver Pond Dam Mill Pond Dam Petersburgh Duanesburg Hudson Wildlife Marsh DamSecond Pond Dam Cohoes Lake Elizabeth Dam Sharon Quacken Kill Reservoir DamUnnamed Lent Wildlife Pond Dam Delanson Reservoir Dam Masick Dam Grafton Lee Wildlife Marsh Dam Brunswick Martin Dunham Reservoir Dam Collins Pond Dam Troy Lock & Dam #1 Duane Lake Dam Green Island Cranberry Pond Dam Carlisle Esperance Watervliet Middle DamWatervliet Upper Dam Colonie Watervliet Lower Dam Forest Lake Dam Troy Morris Bardack Dam Wager Dam Schuyler Meadows Club Dam Lake Ridge Dam Beresford Pond Dam Watervliet rapids Ida Lake Dam 8-A Dyken Pond Dam Schuyler Meadows Dam Mt Ida Falls Dam Altamont Metal Dam Roseboom Watervliet Reservoir Dam Smarts Pond Dam dam Camp Fire Girls DamUnnamed dam Albia Dam Guilderland Glass Pond Dam spillway Wynants Kill Walter Kersch Dam Seward Rensselaer Lake Dam Harris Dam Albia Ice Pond Dam Altamont Main Reservoir Dam West Albany Storm Retention Dam & Dike 7-E 7-F Altamont Reservoir Dam I-90 Dam Sage Estates Dam Poestenkill Knox Waldens Pond DamBecker Lake Dam Pollard Pond Dam Loudonville Reservoir Dam John Finn Pond Dam Cobleskill Albany Country Club Pond Dam O t s e g o Schoharie Tivoli Lake Dam 7-A .
    [Show full text]