DOCSLIB.ORG

Toward an Incremental Democracy and Governance: Chinese Theories and Assessment Criteria

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Toward an Incremental Democracy and Governance: Chinese Theories and Assessment Criteria CHAPTER NINE TOWARD AN INCREMENTAL DEMOCRACY AND GOVERNANCE: CHINESE THEORIES AND ASSESSMENT CRITERIA Introduction Any political discourse is bound by the political era in which it takes place. This is especially true in China, which has witnessed many politi- cal movements since 1949. Prevailing political terms are replaced by newer ones as an older political era gives way to a newer one. From 1949 to 1978, the most popular terms included “revolution,” “dictator- ship” and “class struggle,” but their popularity has waned since 1978. Instead, new terms like “reform,” “rule of law” and “stability” have since become well known. The term “democracy,” however, is an excep- tion to the vagaries of political fashion. Most Chinese scholars hold that democracy is a foreign word, and that “there was neither democracy nor science in traditional Chinese culture.”1 Nevertheless “democracy” is always on the list of popular terms in modern Chinese political his- tory, regardless of the ruler or the regime. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) used democracy as a basis of legitimacy for overthrowing the Guomindang (GMD) regime in the years leading up to 1949. Mao Zedong, the CCP’s senior leader, even wrote a pamphlet entitled “New Democracy.” “Democracy” remained one of the most effective slogans after the CCP came to power in 1949 and even during the “Cultural Revolution,” though it was never actually implemented. China’s politics and economy have undergone fundamental changes since the reform and opening up process began in 1978, and all formerly popular politi- cal terms have all but vanished—except for “democracy.” There is no doubt that both the Chinese understanding and practice of democracy are undergoing great changes, but the term remains unchanged. 1 Li Shenzhi, “Neither Democracy Nor Science in Traditional Chinese Culture,” in: Selections On Liberation (1978–1998), ed. by Qiushi, Beijing, Jingjiribao Chubanshe, 1998, p. 1118. 252 chapter nine Chinese Concepts of Democracy during the Mao Era In the era of Mao Zedong, like other political terms, the concept of democracy was not open to discussion and was used exclusively by the authorities in a specifi c way. The only offi cial view of democracy in that context was as follows: democracy was a superstructure built upon an economic foundation; in the fi nal analysis, it was not an ultimate value and goal, but rather a means to achieve economic goals, and it therefore served economic development; all democracies in human his- tory were by nature class democracies, for classless democracy does not exist. To date, there had been only two types of democracy: socialist and capitalist. Socialist democracy was the highest form of democracy while the capitalist version was false; democracy and dictatorship were complementary, in that democracy for the proletariat and dictatorship for the bourgeoisie were two sides of the same coin. As Mao wrote, “The combination of these two aspects, democracy for the people and dictatorship over the reactionaries, is the People’s Democratic Dictatorship.”2 Democracy and centralization were combined into “democratic centralism,” that is, centralization based on democracy, and democracy under centralized guidance. Such “democratic central- ism” has been an underlying principle of both the Constitution of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the Constitution of the People’s Republic of China.3 There are many defects in such a view of democracy. First of all, it is an instrumentalist view that regards democracy as a means to attain economic goals, not as one of ultimate human value, so that democracy is devaluated to the status of a simple instrument for human beings. As a result, democracy becomes inessential in practical politics. Furthermore, according to this instrumentalist view, democracy for the people and dictatorship over the enemy are indivisible. However with no legally prescribed way to differentiate between the people and the enemy, identifying the people and the enemy depended on the will of 2 Mao Zedong, “On the People’s Democratic Dictatorship,” in: Selected Works of Mao Zedong, Vol. 3, Beijing, People’s Publishing House, 1991, p. 1475. 3 The General Provisions of The Constitution of the Chinese Communist Party stipulate that “we should abide by democratic centralism. This combines centralization on the basis of democracy and democracy under centralized guidance.” Article 3 of the General Provisions of the Constitution of the People’s Republic of China stipulates that “the state organs of the People’s Republic of China should exercise democratic centralism.”.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Francis Fukuyama the National Interest Summer 1989
    The End of History? Francis Fukuyama The National Interest Summer 1989 IN WATCHING the flow of events the intellectual climate of the world's over the past decade or so, it is hard to two largest communist countries, and avoid the feeling that something very the beginnings of significant reform fundamental has happened in world movements in both. But this history. The past year has seen a flood phenomenon extends beyond high of articles commemorating the end of politics and it can be seen also in the the Cold War, and the fact that "peace" ineluctable spread of consumerist seems to be breaking out in many Western culture in such diverse regions of the world. Most of these contexts as the peasants' markets and analyses lack any larger conceptual color television sets now omnipresent framework for distinguishing between throughout China, the cooperative what is essential and what is restaurants and clothing stores opened contingent or accidental in world in the past year in Moscow, the history, and are predictably Beethoven piped into Japanese superficial. If Mr. Gorbachev were department stores, and the rock music ousted from the Kremlin or a new enjoyed alike in Prague, Rangoon, and Ayatollah proclaimed the millennium Tehran. from a desolate Middle Eastern What we may be witnessing is not capital, these same commentators just the end of the Cold War, or the would scramble to announce the passing of a particular period of rebirth of a new era of conflict. postwar history, but the end of history And yet, all of these people sense as such: that is, the end point of dimly that there is some larger process mankind's ideological evolution and at work, a process that gives coherence the universalization of Western liberal and order to the daily headlines.
    [Show full text]
  • China As a "Cyber Great Power": Beijing's Two Voices In
    SECURITY, STRATEGY, AND ORDER APRIL 2021 CHINA AS A “CYBER GREAT POWER” BEIJING’S TWO VOICES IN TELECOMMUNICATIONS RUSH DOSHI, EMILY DE LA BRUYÈRE, NATHAN PICARSIC, AND JOHN FERGUSON CHINA AS A “CYBER GREAT POWER” BEIJING’S TWO VOICES IN TELECOMMUNICATIONS RUSH DOSHI, EMILY DE LA BRUYÈRE, NATHAN PICARSIC, AND JOHN FERGUSON EXECUTIVE SUMMARY External Chinese government and commercial messaging on information technology (IT) speaks in one voice. Domestically, one hears a different, second voice. The former stresses free markets, openness, collaboration, and interdependence, themes that suggest Huawei and other Chinese companies ought to be treated like other global private sector actors and welcomed into foreign networks. Meanwhile, domestic Chinese government, commercial, and academic discourse emphasizes the limits of free markets and the dangers of reliance on foreign technologies — and, accordingly, the need for industrial policy and government control to protect technologies, companies, and networks. Domestic Chinese discourse also indicates that commercial communication networks, including telecommunications systems, might be used to project power and influence offensively; that international technical standards offer a means with which to cement such power and influence; and — above all — that IT architectures are a domain of zero-sum competition. That external Chinese government and corporate messaging might be disingenuous is by no means a novel conclusion. However, the core differences between that messaging and Chinese internal discussion on IT remain largely undocumented — despite China’s increasing development of and influence over international IT infrastructures, technologies, and norms. This report seeks to fill that gap, documenting the tension between external and internal Chinese discussions on telecommunications, as well as IT more broadly.
    [Show full text]
  • Threats to the US Research Enterprise: China's Talent Recruitment
    United States Senate PERMANENT SUBCOMMITTEE ON INVESTIGATIONS Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Rob Portman, Chairman Tom Carper, Ranking Member Threats to the U.S. Research Enterprise: China’s Talent Recruitment Plans STAFF REPORT PERMANENT SUBCOMMITTEE ON INVESTIGATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE Threats to the U.S. Research Enterprise: China’s Talent Recruitment Plans TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................. 1 II. FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................... 7 III. BACKGROUND ................................................................................................ 14 A. China’s Goal to be the Science and Technology Leader by 2050 .................. 14 1. From Brain Drain to Brain Gain .............................................................. 15 2. China’s Systematic Targeting of Critical Technologies ........................... 17 3. China’s Military-Civilian Fusion Strategy .............................................. 18 4. China’s Strategic Plan for Talent Recruitment ....................................... 20 B. Congressional Testimony on Chinese Talent Recruitment Plans ................ 30 C. China Deletes References to the Thousand Talents Plan ............................. 32 D. After Implementation of Talent Recruitment Plans, More Chinese Students, Researchers, and Scientists are Returning to China .................................... 35 IV. EFFORTS TO SECURE U.S. RESEARCH .................................................
    [Show full text]
  • China's Quest for Global Primacy: an Analysis of Chinese International
    C O R P O R A T I O N TIMOTHY R. HEATH, DEREK GROSSMAN, ASHA CLARK China’s Quest for Global Primacy An Analysis of Chinese International and Defense Strategies to Outcompete the United States For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RRA447-1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0615-6 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2021 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover images: prospective56/iStock/ Getty Images Plus; MF3d/iStock/Getty Images Plus Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface This research explores possible international and defense strategies that China might employ to outcompete the United States and achieve a position of international primacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Democratic Centralism and Administration in China
    This is the accepted version of the chapter published in: F Hualing, J Gillespie, P Nicholson and W Partlett (eds), Socialist Law in Socialist East Asia, Cambridge University Press (2018) Democratic Centralism and Administration in China Sarah BiddulphP0F 1 1. INTRODUCTION The decision issued by the fourth plenary session of the 18th Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP, or Party) in 2014 on Some Major Questions in Comprehensively Promoting Governing the Country According to Law (the ‘Fourth Plenum Decision’) reiterated the Party’s determination to build a ‘socialist rule of law system with Chinese characteristics’.P1F 2P What does this proclamation of the ‘socialist’ nature of China’s version of rule of law mean, if anything? Development of a notion of socialist rule of law in China has included many apparently competing and often mutually inconsistent narratives and trends. So, in searching for indicia of socialism in China’s legal system it is necessary at the outset to acknowledge that what we identify as socialist may be overlaid with other important influences, including at least China’s long history of centralised, bureaucratic governance, Maoist forms of ‘adaptive’ governanceP2F 3P and Western ideological, legal and institutional imports, outside of Marxism–Leninism. In fact, what the Chinese party-state labels ‘socialist’ has already departed from the original ideals of European socialists. This chapter does not engage in a critique of whether Chinese versions of socialism are really ‘socialist’. Instead it examines the influence on China’s legal system of democratic centralism, often attributed to Lenin, but more significantly for this book project firmly embraced by the party-state as a core element of ‘Chinese socialism’.
    [Show full text]
  • Threats to the US Research Enterprise: China's Talent Recruitment
    United States Senate PERMANENT SUBCOMMITTEE ON INVESTIGATIONS Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Rob Portman, Chairman Tom Carper, Ranking Member Threats to the U.S. Research Enterprise: China’s Talent Recruitment Plans STAFF REPORT PERMANENT SUBCOMMITTEE ON INVESTIGATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE Threats to the U.S. Research Enterprise: China’s Talent Recruitment Plans TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................. 1 II. FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................... 7 III. BACKGROUND ................................................................................................ 14 A. China’s Goal to be the Science and Technology Leader by 2050 .................. 14 1. From Brain Drain to Brain Gain .............................................................. 15 2. China’s Systematic Targeting of Critical Technologies ........................... 17 3. China’s Military-Civilian Fusion Strategy .............................................. 18 4. China’s Strategic Plan for Talent Recruitment ....................................... 20 B. Congressional Testimony on Chinese Talent Recruitment Plans ................ 30 C. China Deletes References to the Thousand Talents Plan ............................. 32 D. After Implementation of Talent Recruitment Plans, More Chinese Students, Researchers, and Scientists are Returning to China .................................... 35 IV. EFFORTS TO SECURE U.S. RESEARCH .................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Haiyang Qiangguo: China As a Maritime Power
    15 March 2016 Haiyang Qiangguo: China as a Maritime Power A paper for the “China as a Maritime Power” Conference Revised and updated March 2016 CNA Headquarters Arlington, Virginia By Dr. Thomas J. Bickford Senior Research Scientist China Studies Division of CNA We should pay close attention to both development and security. The former is the foundation of the latter while the latter is a precondition for the former. A wealthy country may build a strong army, and a strong army is able to safeguard a country.1 Xi Jinping pointed out: China is at once a continental power and a maritime power (haiyang daguo) and it possesses broad maritime strategic interests…These achievements have laid a solid foundation for building a strong maritime power (haiyang qiangguo).2 At its 18th Party Congress in November 2012, the Chinese Communist Party adopted a new goal—that China “should enhance our capacity for exploiting marine resources, develop the marine economy, protect the marine ecological environment, resolutely safeguard China’s 1 Xi Jinping, “A Holistic View of National Security,” in The Governance of China, (Beijing: Foreign Languages Press, 2014). 2 “Xi Jinping Stresses the Need To Show Greater Care About the Ocean, Understand More About the Ocean and Make Strategic Plans for the Use of the Ocean, Push Forward the Building of a Maritime Power and Continuously Make New Achievements at the Eighth Collective Study Session of the CPC Central Committee Political Bureau.” Xinhua. July 31, 2013. 1 maritime rights and interests, and build China into a strong maritime power (emphasis added).3 Subsequent commentary by Chinese leaders and national-level documents characterize the goal of becoming a maritime power as essential to China’s national development strategy, the people’s well-being, the safeguarding of national sovereignty, and the rejuvenation of the Chinese nation.4 The 18th Party Congress thus marks an important defining moment.
    [Show full text]
  • On Democratic Centralism
    The Marxist, XXVI 1, January–March 2010 PRAKASH KARAT On Democratic Centralism In the recent period, alongwith a number of critical discussions on the electoral set-back suffered by the CPI (M) and the Left in last Lok Sabha elections, there have been some questions raised about the practice of democratic centralism as the organizational principle of the Communist Party. Such critiques have come from persons who are intellectuals associated with the Left or the CPI (M). Since such views are being voiced by comrades and persons who are not hostile to the Party, or, consider themselves as belonging to the Left, we should address the issues raised by them and respond. This is all the more necessary since the CPI (M) considers the issue of democratic centralism to be a basic and vital one for a party of the working class. Instead of dealing with each of the critiques separately, we are categorising below the various objections and criticisms made. Though, it must be stated that it is not necessary that each of them hold all the views expressed by the others. But the common refrain is that democratic centralism should not serve as the organizational principle of the Communist Party or that it should be modified. What are the points made in these critiques? They can be summed up as follows: THE MARXIST 1. Democratic centralism is characterized as a Party organizational structure fashioned by Lenin to meet the specific conditions of Tsarist autocracy which was an authoritarian and repressive regime. Hence, its emphasis on centralization, creating a core of professional revolutionaries and secrecy.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 2: the China Model: Return of the Middle Kingdom
    SECTION 2: THE CHINA MODEL: RETURN OF THE MIDDLE KINGDOM Key Findings • The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) seeks to revise the inter- national order to be more amenable to its own interests and authoritarian governance system. It desires for other countries not only to acquiesce to its prerogatives but also to acknowledge what it perceives as China’s rightful place at the top of a new hierarchical world order. • The CCP’s ambitions for global preeminence have been con- sistent throughout its existence: every CCP leader since Mao Zedong has proclaimed the Party would ultimately prove the superiority of its Marxist-Leninist system over the rest of the world. Under General Secretary of the CCP Xi Jinping, the Chi- nese government has become more aggressive in pursuing its interests and promoting its model internationally. • The CCP aims to establish an international system in which Beijing can freely influence the behavior and access the mar- kets of other countries while constraining the ability of others to influence its behavior or access markets it controls. The “com- munity of common human destiny,” the CCP’s proposed alter- native global governance system, is explicitly based on histor- ical Chinese traditions and presumes Beijing and the illiberal norms and institutions it favors should be the primary forces guiding globalization. • The CCP has attempted to use the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic to promote itself as a responsible and benevolent global leader and to prove that its model of governance is su- perior to liberal democracy. Thus far, it appears Beijing has not changed many minds, if any.
    [Show full text]
  • Uninterrupted Rise China's Global Strategy According to Xi Jinping Thought the Asan Forum.Pdf
    09/03/2021 Uninterrupted Rise: China’s Global Strategy According to Xi Jinping Thought | The Asan Forum TheAsanForum Home > Special Forum Special Forum March 02,2021 Special Forum Uninterrupted Rise: China’s Global Strategy According to Xi Jinping Thought Steve Tsang, Professor and Director, SOAS China Institute & Olivia Cheung Olivia Cheung, Research Fellow, SOAS China Institute To many in the Chinese leadership the global financial crisis revealed that advanced Western capitalist democracies are “paper-tigers.” This assessment led to growing voices questioning if Deng Xiaoping’s “hide and bide” dictum for foreign policy was still appropriate. Prior to Xi Jinping coming to power in late 2012 the Chinese lead- ership had no consensus on how to move forward beyond Deng. Questions pertain- ing to China’s long-term visions—such as what kind of power it should be, what type of international responsibilities it should and should not shoulder—were dis- tracted by short-term calculations.1 Under Xi China has developed a new global strategy, one of securing the uninterrupted rise of China, in contrast to the strategy of peaceful rise adopted by Hu Jintao, Xi’s predecessor.2 At the 19th National Con- gress of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in October 2017, Xi declared that China had entered a “new era” that would make the “great leap” from “standing up” (with the establishment of the PRC), through “getting rich” to “becoming strong.”3 The contrasts between peaceful rise and uninterrupted rise are stark. Hu sought to underplay China’s rise in propaganda. Xi touts it all the time.
    [Show full text]
  • The 18Th Central Committee Leadership with Comrade Xi Jinping As General Secretary
    The 18th Central Committee Leadership with Comrade Xi Jinping as General Secretary Alice Miller Authoritative party documents refer to the prescribed dynamic of elite politics in the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) as its “collective leadership system.” Despite widespread impressions of Xi Jinping as a rule-busting strongman leader, PRC media consistently depict the current Politburo and its Standing Committee as operating in the same manner they did during the Hu Jintao period: as an oligarchic collective leadership according to the system’s norms. The “Collective Leadership System” Throughout the post-Mao period, the “collective leadership system” (集体领导制) and its elements have been incorporated in the party’s most authoritative public documents: successive party constitutions, political reports delivered to party congresses and Central Committee plenums, and key leader speeches. These documents uniformly state that the system entails two fundamental elements which together enable effective policy-making: collective decision-making by consensus, and a division of policy responsibility among the individual members of the leadership. The appendix to this article transcribes references to the system in such documents. Mao Era Background The party’s “collective leadership system” has traversed a difficult course since its establishment in the mid-1950s.1 The roots of the system were set down in 1948, on the eve of the communist victory in the Chinese civil war. In September 1948, shortly after the party headquarters were reestablished at Xibaipo, Hebei, the party leadership headed by Mao Zedong ordered the strengthening of the party committee system through the CCP apparatus. The long struggle first against the Japanese and then to overthrow the Republican government had encouraged two tendencies that the new order sought to change.
    [Show full text]
  • Explore and Analyse on New Democracy Values
    Explore and Analyse on New Democracy Values Bin ZENG Marxism Colledge, Southwest Jiaodong University of China Abstract: On the eve of the end of the War of Resistance against Japan, Mao Zedong, in response to the feudal fascist values put forward by the Kuomintang, in order to integrate the value objectives of the Chinese nation with the value de- mands of the Chinese people and fully embody the organic unity of the two, on behalf of the whole Party, put forward new democratic values with internal logic and strict integrity, with independence, freedom, democracy, unity, prosperity and strength as the basic content, and with the fundamental value orientation of seeking happiness for the people and rejuvenation for the nation. Keywords: New democracy valuesanalyse DOI: 10.47297/wspciWSP2516-252701.20200403 1. Origins of New Democratic Values ao Zedong put forward the new democratic values with “independence, M freedom, democracy, unity and prosperity” as the concrete value concept 12 times in the first half of 1945. The direct cause of his proposal was Chiang Kai-shek’s book “the fate of China “, which embodied the feudal fascist values of the Kuomintang in 1943. In his book, Jiang not only continued to advocate the feudal values of” propriety, righteousness, honesty and shame “(that is ,” four di- mensions “) and “loyalty, filial piety, benevolence, love, faith, righteousness, har- mony and equality “(that is ,” eight virtues “), but also advocated that China should pursue the fascist values of” one country, one leader and one doctrine
    [Show full text]