DOCSLIB.ORG

Seals Range State Policy and Management

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Seals Range State Policy and Management SealS Range State Policy and Management Review Occasional Paper of the IUCN Species Survival Commission No. 55 About IUCN IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature, helps the world find pragmatic solutions to our most pressing environment and development challenges. IUCN’s work focuses on valuing and conserving nature, ensuring effective and equitable governance of its use, and deploying nature-based solutions to global challenges in climate food and development. IUCN supports scientific research, manages field projects all over the world, and brings governments, NGOs, the UN and companies together to develop policy, laws and best practice. IUCN is the world’s oldest and largest global environmental organization, with almost 1,300 government and NGO Members and more than 15,000 volunteer experts in 185 countries. IUCN’s work is supported by almost 1,000 staff in 45 offices and hundreds of partners in public, NGO and private sectors around the world. http://www.iucn.org IUCN Species Survival Commission The Species Survival Commission (SSC) is the largest of IUCN’s six volunteer commissions with a diverse global membership of nearly 10,000 experts. With biodiversity loss as one of the world’s most pressing crises, and many species declining to critical levels, the SSC drives its efforts and expertise to conserving nature through positive and informed action. This is achieved through the strength of its dedicated science- based network of volunteer experts, who constitute the invaluable “power house” of the SSC. Web: http:// www.iucn.org/ssc IUCN Commission on Environment, Economics and Social Policy CEESP, the IUCN Commission on Environmental, Economic and Social Policy, is an interdisciplinary network of professionals whose mission is to act as a source of advice of the environmental, economic, social and cultural factors that affect natural resources and biological diversity, and to provide guidance and support towards effective policies and practices in environmental conservation and sustainable development. http://www.iucn.org/ceesp IUCN SSC/CEESP Sustainable Use and Livelihoods Specialist Group The SSC/CEESP Sustainable Use and Livelihoods Specialist Group is a global, volunteer, expert network formed by IUCN as a joint initiative of the Species Survival Commission (SSC) and the Commission on Environmental, Economic and Social Policy (CEESP). Bridging the social and biological strengths of SSC and CEESP, it is uniquely placed to provide credible, sound technical advice on sustainable use and livelihoods. SULi’s misison is to promote both conservation and livelihoods through enhancing equitable and sustainable use of wild species and their associated ecosystems. http://iucn.org/suli SealS Range State Policy and Management Review SealS Range State Policy and Management Review Author Information: David H. M. Cumming Honorary Professor, Percy Fitzpatrick Institute, University of Cape Town / Research Associate, Tropical Resource Ecology, University of Zimbabwe 19 Walmer Drive, Highlands Harare, Zimbabwe The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN, the European Union, the ACP Secretariat or the compilers concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. This publication has been produced with the support of the International Fur Federation. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN, the European Union, the ACP Secretariat, the International Fur Federation, or other participating organizations. Published by: IUCN, Gland, Switzerland Copyright: © 2015 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. Citation: Cumming, D. H. M. (2015). Seal Range State Policy and Management Review. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN SSC/CEESP Sustainable Use and Livelihoods Specialist Group. xiv + 94pp. ISBN: DOI: Front Cover: Colony of cape fur seals from Cape Point, Namibia. © Davide Guidolin Back Cover: Grey seal (Halichoerus grypus) in the Canadian Arctic. © Raldi Somers Layout and printing by: Conservation Visions Inc. Available from: IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) Global Species Programme Rue Mauverney 28 1196 Gland Switzerland Tel +41 22 999 0000 Fax +41 22 999 0002 www.iucn.org/publications Also available at https://portals.iucn.org/library Seal Range State Policy and Management Review v SUMMARY Seals have been harvested and their products (furs, oils and meat) used by humans for thousands of years. However, large-scale commercial sealing is a comparatively recent development. It began in the 17th century and reached a peak in the 19th and early 20th centuries. In the northern hemisphere, northern fur seals and harp seals were the main targets of these harvests. The primary products were pelts and oil. Annual catches exceeded 300,000 northern fur seals in the late 1860s, and more than 700,000 harp seals in the 1920s and 1950s. In the southern oceans, sealing for various fur seal species collapsed by the 1920s as a result of over-exploitation. Presently, sustainable commercial harvesting of seals (mainly harp seals) by Canada takes place by in the western North Atlantic and by Norway in the Greenland Sea. Cape fur seals are harvested commercially on the coast of Namibia. Indigenous peoples living in the North Atlantic, North Pacific and in arctic coastal areas harvest several species of seals. This harvest represents an integral component of both their household economies and culture. The primary objective of this study is to survey range state policies and management responses to growing or abundant seal populations. The management of seals1 and related policies in Antarctica, the European Union (EU) and six range states, all of which include abundant or growing populations of seals, are reviewed. The range states are Canada, Greenland, Norway, Russia and the United States of America (USA), which have territories bordering on the Arctic, and Namibia in the southern hemisphere. Eight seal species are included in this review, six of which inhabit northern areas including harp (Pagophilus groenlandicus), hooded (Cystophora cristata), northern fur (Callorhinus ursinus), grey (Halichoerus grypus), harbour (Phoca vitulina) and ringed (Pusa hispida) seals, while two species inhabit southern areas, namely, Cape fur (Arctocephalus pusillus) and crabeater (Lobodon carcinophagus) seals. Harp, crabeater and ringed seals are the most abundant of the eight species included in this review, and account for about 75% of the global combined population of approximately 23 million seals within these eight species worldwide. Harp seals are distributed in three populations. The largest is the Northwest Atlantic population of 7.5 million that moves between the Gulf of St Lawrence and Baffin Bay from which an average of ~ 150,000 seals/year have been harvested over the last five years. The second population in the Greenland Sea is estimated to number 627,000 with an annual take of 5,000 to 8,000 a year in the West Ice (off Jan Mayen) by Norway. The third population breeds in the White Sea (or East Ice); it is estimated to number some 1.36 million seals. However, no commercial harvests have taken place in the Barents and White seas by Russia since 2009, or by Norway since 2012 where an annual take of 7,000 was allocated. Animals from the West and East Ice breeding areas mix during the summer in the Northern Barents Sea, but return to their respective breeding areas. The species is listed as ‘Least Concern’ by IUCN. Hooded seals are also found in three populations, one in “The Front” (off Newfoundland), another in Davis Strait and a third in the West Ice (near Jan Mayen in the Northeast Atlantic). The Canadian population was last censused in 2005 with an estimate of 593,500 and an annual take of less than 5,000 from a total allowable catch (TAC) of 8,200. The average number of hooded seals taken annually in Greenland was 5,867 between 1993 and 2009. The Northeast Atlantic hooded seal population has declined by 85-90% over the last few decades, and a zero quota for the commercial harvest has been in place since 2008. The species is classified as ‘Vulnerable’ by IUCN, and is classified as ‘Not at Risk’ in Canada. Northern fur seals occur across the North Pacific Ocean. Their numbers have been declining for several years along with several other pinniped species in the North Pacific, probably due to a climate induced regime shift. The most recent estimate (2013) for the fur seal stock in the Eastern Pacific is 639,545. The 1 In the context of this report “seals” refers to true seals and fur seals and excludes sea lions and walruses Seal Range State Policy and Management Review vi species is classified as ‘depleted’ under the USA Marine Mammal Protection Act and as ‘Vulnerable’ by IUCN. Grey seals are distributed in the North Atlantic in three main sub-populations, namely, in the West Atlantic (Gulf of Maine, Gulf of St Lawrence and northward to southern Labrador), in the East Atlantic centred on the United Kingdom (UK), and in the Baltic Sea. All populations are considered to be growing with an overall abundance estimate of ~ 550,000 seals. Grey seals are increasingly being implicated in seal-fisheries conflicts and commercial harvests are taken in Canada with an annual take of up to 5,000. In Norway the annual average take was 302 between 2008 and 2012. The IUCN status for the species is ‘Least Concern’. Grey seals are protected in Greenland waters, where they are extremely rare. Harbour seals are widely distributed in coastal waters of the northern hemisphere and, although some subspecies are in small and declining populations, overall the species is considered to be stable or increasing.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Alaska Sea Lions and Seals
    Alaska Sea Lions and Seals Blaire, Kate, Donovan, & Alex Biodiversity of Alaska 18 June 2017 https://www.stlzoo.org/files/3913/6260/5731/Sea-lion_RogerBrandt.jpg Similarities & Differences of Sea Lions and Seals Phocidae Family Otariidae Family cannot rotate back can rotate back flippers flippers; move like a marine under themselves to walk caterpillar on land mammals and run on land no external earflaps pinniped, “fin external earflaps footed” in use back flippers for Latin use front flippers for power when swimming power when swimming preyed upon by polar use front flippers for use back flippers for bears, orcas, steering when swimming steering when swimming and sharks food: krill, fish, lobster, food: squid, octopus, birds birds, and fish claws and fur on front no claws or hair on front flippers flippers Seals ("What’s the Difference “ 2017) Sea Lions Evolution • Both seals and sea lions are Pinnipeds • Descended from one ancestral line • Belong to order carnivora • Closest living relatives are bears and musteloids (diverged 50 million years ago) http://what-when-how.com/marine-mammals/pinniped-evolution- (Churchill 2015) marine-mammals/ http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/cndy/2009-04/24/content_7710231.htm Phylogenetics https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pinniped Steller: Eumetopias jubatus http://www.arkive.org/stellers-sea-lion/eumetopias-jubatus/image-G62602.html Steller: Eumetopias jubatus • Classification (”Steller Sea Lion” 2017) Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata Class: Mamalia Order: Carnivora Family: Otarridae Genus: Eumetopias Species:
    [Show full text]
  • Monk Seals in Post-Classical History
    Monk Seals in Post-Classical History The role of the Mediterranean monk seal (Monachus monachus) in European history and culture, from the fall of Rome to the 20th century William M. Johnson Mededelingen No. 39 2004 NEDERLANDSCHE COMMISSIE VOOR INTERNATIONALE NATUURBESCHERMING Mededelingen No. 39 i NEDERLANDSCHE COMMISSIE VOOR INTERNATIONALE NATUURBESCHERMING Netherlands Commission for International Nature Protection Secretariaat: Dr. H.P. Nooteboom National Herbarium of the Netherlands Rijksuniversiteit Leiden Einsteinweg 2 Postbus 9514, 2300 RA Leiden Mededelingen No. 39, 2004 Editor: Dr. H.P. Nooteboom PDF edition 2008: Matthias Schnellmann Copyright © 2004 by William M. Johnson ii MONK SEALS IN POST-CLASSICAL HISTORY The role of the Mediterranean monk seal (Monachus monachus) in European history and culture, from the fall of Rome to the 20th century by William M. Johnson Editor, The Monachus Guardian www.monachus-guardian.org email: [email protected] iii iv TABLE OF CONTENTS MONK SEALS IN POST-CLASSICAL HISTORY ......................................................III ABSTRACT ......................................................................................................................... VII ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................ VII MONK SEALS IN POST-CLASSICAL HISTORY ..............................................................................1 AN INTRODUCTION TO THE SPECIES ......................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Mammals of Hudson Strait the Following Marine Mammals Are Common to Hudson Strait, However, Other Species May Also Be Seen
    Marine Mammals of Hudson Strait The following marine mammals are common to Hudson Strait, however, other species may also be seen. It’s possible for marine mammals to venture outside of their common habitats and may be seen elsewhere. Bowhead Whale Length: 13-19 m Appearance: Stocky, with large head. Blue-black body with white markings on the chin, belly and just forward of the tail. No dorsal fin or ridge. Two blow holes, no teeth, has baleen. Behaviour: Blow is V-shaped and bushy, reaching 6 m in height. Often alone but sometimes in groups of 2-10. Habitat: Leads and cracks in pack ice during winter and in open water during summer. Status: Special concern Beluga Whale Length: 4-5 m Appearance: Adults are almost entirely white with a tough dorsal ridge and no dorsal fin. Young are grey. Behaviour: Blow is low and hardly visible. Not much of the body is visible out of the water. Found in small groups, but sometimes hundreds to thousands during annual migrations. Habitat: Found in open water year-round. Prefer shallow coastal water during summer and water near pack ice in winter. Killer Whale Status: Endangered Length: 8-9 m Appearance: Black body with white throat, belly and underside and white spot behind eye. Triangular dorsal fin in the middle of the back. Male dorsal fin can be up to 2 m in high. Behaviour: Blow is tall and column shaped; approximately 4 m in height. Narwhal Typically form groups of 2-25. Length: 4-5 m Habitat: Coastal water and open seas, often in water less than 200 m depth.
    [Show full text]
  • 56. Otariidae and Phocidae
    FAUNA of AUSTRALIA 56. OTARIIDAE AND PHOCIDAE JUDITH E. KING 1 Australian Sea-lion–Neophoca cinerea [G. Ross] Southern Elephant Seal–Mirounga leonina [G. Ross] Ross Seal, with pup–Ommatophoca rossii [J. Libke] Australian Sea-lion–Neophoca cinerea [G. Ross] Weddell Seal–Leptonychotes weddellii [P. Shaughnessy] New Zealand Fur-seal–Arctocephalus forsteri [G. Ross] Crab-eater Seal–Lobodon carcinophagus [P. Shaughnessy] 56. OTARIIDAE AND PHOCIDAE DEFINITION AND GENERAL DESCRIPTION Pinnipeds are aquatic carnivores. They differ from other mammals in their streamlined shape, reduction of pinnae and adaptation of both fore and hind feet to form flippers. In the skull, the orbits are enlarged, the lacrimal bones are absent or indistinct and there are never more than three upper and two lower incisors. The cheek teeth are nearly homodont and some conditions of the ear that are very distinctive (Repenning 1972). Both superfamilies of pinnipeds, Phocoidea and Otarioidea, are represented in Australian waters by a number of species (Table 56.1). The various superfamilies and families may be distinguished by important and/or easily observed characters (Table 56.2). King (1983b) provided more detailed lists and references. These and other differences between the above two groups are not regarded as being of great significance, especially as an undoubted fur seal (Australian Fur-seal Arctocephalus pusillus) is as big as some of the sea lions and has some characters of the skull, teeth and behaviour which are rather more like sea lions (Repenning, Peterson & Hubbs 1971; Warneke & Shaughnessy 1985). The Phocoidea includes the single Family Phocidae – the ‘true seals’, distinguished from the Otariidae by the absence of a pinna and by the position of the hind flippers (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • The Grey Seal
    Factsheet: The grey seal Happy Horsey Seal by Mary Groombridge Where can grey seals be found? The grey seal is the larger and more common of the two British seal species, the other being the common seal (aka harbour seal). There are 3 distinct populations of grey seals in the world, but it is the eastern Atlantic population that is mainly found in the UK. One hundred years ago there were only around 500 grey seals in this country. Now however, half of the world’s population, approximately 80,000 individuals, are found on and around British coasts. They are usually found mainly around exposed rocky northern and western coasts, however the wide, sandy beaches in Norfolk provide an important breeding area for them. What do grey seals look like? Grey seals are classed as ‘true seals’, meaning that they have no external ears and have shorter front flippers. Unlike ‘eared seals’ such as sea lions, grey seals are less mobile on land and tend to move along the ground on their belly. The grey seal can be distinguished from the common seal by its long, straight ‘Roman’ nose and wide nostrils earning its scientific name Halichoerus grypus, meaning "hooked-nosed sea pig". Common seals have smaller, rounder heads with shorter noses. Adult grey seals can grow up to 2.5 metres long; males are much larger than females, averaging 233kg in weight, while females average around 155kg. Males are generally darker in colour and often scarred from territorial battles with other males. For this reason males rarely live longer than 25 years, while females can live for up to 35 years.
    [Show full text]
  • December 20, 2007
    BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF COMMERCE PETITION TO LIST THE RIBBON SEAL (HISTRIOPHOCA FASCIATA) AS A THREATENED OR ENDANGERED SPECIES UNDER THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT © G. CARLETON RAY CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY DECEMBER 20, 2007 Notice of Petition____________________________________________________ Carlos M. Gutierrez Secretary of Commerce U.S. Department of Commerce 1401 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Room 5516 Washington, D.C. 20230 Dr. William Hogarth Assistant Administrator for Fisheries National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration 1315 East-West Highway Silver Springs, MD 20910 PETITIONER The Center for Biological Diversity 1095 Market Street, Suite 511 San Francisco, CA 94103 ph: (415) 436-9682 ext 301 fax: (415) 436-9683 __________________________ Date: this 20th day of December, 2007 Shaye Wolf, Ph.D. Martha Palomino Tovar, Ph.D. Candidate Brendan Cummings Center for Biological Diversity Pursuant to Section 4(b) of the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. §1533(b), Section 553(3) of the Administrative Procedures Act, 5 U.S.C. § 553(e), and 50 C.F.R. §424.14(a), the Center for Biological Diversity (“Petitioner”) hereby petitions the Secretary of Commerce, through the National Marine Fisheries Service (“NMFS”), to list the ribbon seal (Histriophoca fasciata) as a threatened or endangered species and to designate critical habitat to ensure its survival and recovery. The Center for Biological Diversity (“Center”) is a non-profit, public interest environmental organization dedicated to the protection of native species and their habitats through science, policy, and environmental law. The Center has over 40,000 members in Alaska and throughout the United States. The Center and its members are concerned with the conservation of endangered species, including the ribbon seal, and the effective implementation of the ESA.
    [Show full text]
  • Cranial Morphological Distinctiveness Between Ursus Arctos and U
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 5-2017 Cranial Morphological Distinctiveness Between Ursus arctos and U. americanus Benjamin James Hillesheim East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Evolution Commons, and the Paleontology Commons Recommended Citation Hillesheim, Benjamin James, "Cranial Morphological Distinctiveness Between Ursus arctos and U. americanus" (2017). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 3261. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/3261 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Cranial Morphological Distinctiveness Between Ursus arctos and U. americanus ____________________________________ A thesis presented to the Department of Geosciences East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in Geosciences ____________________________________ by Benjamin Hillesheim May 2017 ____________________________________ Dr. Blaine W. Schubert, Chair Dr. Steven C. Wallace Dr. Josh X. Samuels Keywords: Ursidae, Geometric morphometrics, Ursus americanus, Ursus arctos, Last Glacial Maximum ABSTRACT Cranial Morphological Distinctiveness Between Ursus arctos and U. americanus by Benjamin J. Hillesheim Despite being separated by millions of years of evolution, black bears (Ursus americanus) and brown bears (Ursus arctos) can be difficult to distinguish based on skeletal and dental material alone. Complicating matters, some Late Pleistocene U. americanus are significantly larger in size than their modern relatives, obscuring the identification of the two bears.
    [Show full text]
  • Coyote Canis Latrans in 2007 IUCN Red List (Canis Latrans)
    MAMMALS OF MISSISSIPPI 10:1–9 Coyote (Canis latrans) CHRISTOPHER L. MAGEE Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi, 39762, USA Abstract—Canis latrans (Say 1823) is a canid commonly called the coyote. It is dog-like in appearance with varied colorations throughout its range. Originally restricted to the western portion of North America, coyotes have expanded across the majority of the continent. Coyotes are omnivorous and extremely adaptable, often populating urban and suburban environments. Preferred habitats include a mixture of forested, open, and brushy areas. Currently, there exist no threats or conservation concerns for the coyote in any part of its range. This species is currently experiencing an increasing population trend. Published 5 December 2008 by the Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, Mississippi State University Coyote location (Jackson 1951; Young 1951; Berg and Canis latrans (Say, 1823) Chesness 1978; Way 2007). The species is sexually dimorphic, with adult females distinctly CONTEXT AND CONTENT. lighter and smaller than adult males (Kennedy Order Carnivora, suborder Caniformia, et al. 2003; Way 2007). Average head and infraorder Cynoidea, family Canidae, subfamily body lengths are about 1.0–1.5 m with a tail Caninae, tribe Canini. Genus Canis consists length of about Young 1951). The skull of the of six species: C. aureus, C. latrans, C. lupus, coyote (Fig. 2) progresses through 6 distinct C. mesomelas, C. simensis, and C. adustus. developmental stages allowing delineation Canis latrans has 19 recognized subspecies between the age classes of juvenile, immature, (Wilson and Reeder 2005). young, young adult, adult, and old adult (Jackson 1951).
    [Show full text]
  • Academic Dress Rules
    Academic Dress Rules 1. The University may, in respect of any University occasion, prescribe that academic dress shall be worn by students, graduates, graduates-elect or staff, or any of them, attending such occasion. 2. Academic dress shall be worn by students, graduates, graduates-elect and staff attending a University graduation ceremony. 3. The academic dress shall be: Level of award Gown Hood Cap or bonnet Professional Certificate Black gown in Cambridge No hood Black trencher cap BA style Sub-bachelor (ie Certificates Black gown in Cambridge No hood Black trencher cap and Diplomas) BA style Graduates of awards offered by the Centre for Aboriginal Studies in Music will also wear the prescribed stole Bachelor (including four year Black gown in Cambridge Black partly lined Black trencher cap degrees awarded without BA style 150mm wide with the honours) discipline colour 4, 5 and 6 year Bachelor Black gown in Cambridge Black entirely lined Black trencher cap including MBBS, BDS and four BA style with the discipline year degrees awarded with colour including a honours 12.5-13mm edging in the discipline colour Honours on the cape Graduate Certificate Black gown in Cambridge Black partly lined Black trencher cap Graduate Diploma BA style 150mm wide with white Coursework Masters Black gown in Cambridge Black entirely lined Black trencher cap MA style with white including a 12.5-13mm edging in white on the cape Black gown in Cambridge Black entirely lined Black trencher cap Masters by Research MA style with scarlet including a 12.5-13mm
    [Show full text]
  • Global Patterns in Marine Mammal Distributions
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION I. TAXONOMIC DECISIONS In this work we followed Wilson and Reeder (2005) and Reeves, Stewart, and Clapham’s (2002) taxonomy. In the last 20 years several new species have been described such as Mesoplodon perrini (Dalebout 2002), Orcaella heinsohni (Beasley 2005), and the recognition of several species have been proposed for orcas (Perrin 1982, Pitman et al. 2007), Bryde's whales (Kanda et al. 2007), Blue whales (Garrigue et al. 2003, Ichihara 1996), Tucuxi dolphin (Cunha et al. 2005, Caballero et al. 2008), and other marine mammals. Since we used the conservation status of all species following IUCN (2011), this work is based on species recognized by this IUCN to keep a standardized baseline. II. SPECIES LIST List of the species included in this paper, indicating their conservation status according to IUCN (2010.4) and its range area. Order Family Species IUCN 2010 Freshwater Range area km2 Enhydra lutris EN A2abe 1,084,750,000,000 Mustelidae Lontra felina EN A3cd 996,197,000,000 Odobenidae Odobenus rosmarus DD 5,367,060,000,000 Arctocephalus australis LC 1,674,290,000,000 Arctocephalus forsteri LC 1,823,240,000,000 Arctocephalus galapagoensis EN A2a 167,512,000,000 Arctocephalus gazella LC 39,155,300,000,000 Arctocephalus philippii NT 163,932,000,000 Arctocephalus pusillus LC 1,705,430,000,000 Arctocephalus townsendi NT 1,045,950,000,000 Carnivora Otariidae Arctocephalus tropicalis LC 39,249,100,000,000 Callorhinus ursinus VU A2b 12,935,900,000,000 Eumetopias jubatus EN A2a 3,051,310,000,000 Neophoca cinerea
    [Show full text]
  • A Study on the Design and Composition of Victorian Women's Mantle
    Journal of Fashion Business Vol. 14, No. 6, pp.188~203(2010) A Study on the Design and Composition of Victorian Women’s Mantle * Lee Sangrye ‧ Kim Hyejeong Professor, Dept. of Fashion Design, TongMyong University * Associate Professor, Dept. of Clothing Industry, Hankyong National University Abstract This study purposed to identify the design and composition characteristics of mantle through a historical review of its change and development focusing on women’s dress. This analysis was particularly focused on the Victorian age because the variety of mantle designs introduced and popularized was wider than ever since ancient times to the present. For this study, we collected historical literature on mantle from ancient times to the 19 th century and made comparative analysis of design and composition, and for the Victorian age we investigated also actual items from the period. During the early Victorian age when the crinoline style was popular, mantle was of A‐ line silhouette spreading downward from the shoulders and of around knee length. In the mid Victorian age from 1870 to 1889 when the bustle style was popular, the style of mantle was changed to be three‐ dimensional, exaggerating the rear side of the bustle skirt. In addition, with increase in women’s suburban activities, walking costume became popular and mantle reached its climax. With the diversification of design and composition in this period, the name of mantle became more specific and as a result, mantle, mantelet, dolman, paletot, etc. were used. The styles popular were: it looked like half-jacket and half-cape. Ornaments such as tassels, fur, braids, rosettes, tufts and fringe were attached to create luxurious effects.
    [Show full text]
  • What They Wear the Observer | FEBRUARY 2020 | 1 in the Habit
    SPECIAL SECTION FEBRUARY 2020 Inside Poor Clare Colettines ....... 2 Benedictines of Marmion Abbey What .............................. 4 Everyday Wear for Priests ......... 6 Priests’ Vestments ...... 8 Deacons’ Attire .......................... 10 Monsignors’ They Attire .............. 12 Bishops’ Attire ........................... 14 — Text and photos by Amanda Hudson, news editor; design by Sharon Boehlefeld, features editor Wear Learn the names of the everyday and liturgical attire worn by bishops, monsignors, priests, deacons and religious in the Rockford Diocese. And learn what each piece of clothing means in the lives of those who have given themselves to the service of God. What They Wear The Observer | FEBRUARY 2020 | 1 In the Habit Mother Habits Span Centuries Dominica Stein, PCC he wearing n The hood — of habits in humility; religious com- n The belt — purity; munities goes and Tback to the early 300s. n The scapular — The Armenian manual labor. monks founded by For women, a veil Eustatius in 318 was part of the habit, were the first to originating from the have their entire rite of consecrated community virgins as a bride of dress alike. Belt placement Christ. Using a veil was Having “the members an adaptation of the societal practice (dress) the same,” says where married women covered their Mother Dominica Stein, hair when in public. Poor Clare Colettines, “was a Putting on the habit was an symbol of unity. The wearing of outward sign of profession in a the habit was a symbol of leaving religious order. Early on, those the secular life to give oneself to joining an order were clothed in the God.” order’s habit almost immediately.
    [Show full text]