ASTROBIOLOGY Volume 18, Number 8, 2018 Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. DOI: 10.1089/ast.2017.1770
Sulfidic Anion Concentrations on Early Earth for Surficial Origins-of-Life Chemistry
Sukrit Ranjan,1,2 Zoe R. Todd,1 John D. Sutherland,3 and Dimitar D. Sasselov1
Abstract
A key challenge in origin-of-life studies is understanding the environmental conditions on early Earth under which abiogenesis occurred. While some constraints do exist (e.g., zircon evidence for surface liquid water), relatively few constraints exist on the abundances of trace chemical species, which are relevant to assessing the plausibility and guiding the development of postulated prebiotic chemical pathways which depend on these species. In this work, we combine literature photochemistry models with simple equilibrium chemistry cal- - - 2- culations to place constraints on the plausible range of concentrations of sulfidic anions (HS , HSO3 ,SO3 ) available in surficial aquatic reservoirs on early Earth due to outgassing of SO2 and H2S and their dissolution into small shallow surface water reservoirs like lakes. We find that this mechanism could have supplied prebiotically relevant levels of SO2-derived anions, but not H2S-derived anions. Radiative transfer modeling suggests UV light would have remained abundant on the planet surface for all but the largest volcanic ex- plosions. We apply our results to the case study of the proposed prebiotic reaction network of Patel et al. (2015) and discuss the implications for improving its prebiotic plausibility. In general, epochs of moderately high volcanism could have been especially conducive to cyanosulfidic prebiotic chemistry. Our work can be simi- larly applied to assess and improve the prebiotic plausibility of other postulated surficial prebiotic chemistries that are sensitive to sulfidic anions, and our methods adapted to study other atmospherically derived trace species. Key Words: Early Earth—Origin of life—Prebiotic chemistry—Volcanism—UV radiation—Planetary environments. Astrobiology 18, 1023–1040.
1. Introduction surface, the mix of gases being outgassed to the atmosphere, the bulk pH of the ocean, and the conditions available at key challenge for origins-of-life studies is determin- deep-sea hydrothermal vents (Bada et al., 1994; Farquhar Aing the environmental conditions on early Earth. En- et al., 2000; Delano, 2001; Holm and Charlou, 2001; Mojzsis vironmental conditions (e.g., pH, temperature, pressure, et al., 2001; McCollom and Seewald, 2007; Trail et al., 2011; chemical feedstock abundance) play a major role in deter- Mulkidjanian et al., 2012; Beckstead et al., 2016; Sojo et al., mining the kinds of prebiotic chemistry that are possible or 2016; Halevy and Bachan, 2017; Novoselov et al., 2017; probable, and hence can help constrain the plausibility of Ranjan and Sasselov, 2017). proposed origin-of-life scenarios (e.g., Urey, 1952; Corliss One challenging environmental factor to constrain is the et al., 1981; McCollom, 2013; Ruiz-Mirazo et al., 2014). abundance of trace chemical species on early Earth. These Consequently, it is critical to understand the range of envi- species can be important to proposed prebiotic chemical ronmental conditions available on early Earth for abiogenesis pathways as feedstocks or catalysts, but their abundances on to proceed. Work over the past few decades has begun to early Earth can be difficult to determine due to their rarity constrain the environmental conditions that may have been and hence limited impact on an already scarce rock record. available for abiogenesis, including but not limited to the past In this paper, we explore the plausible abundances of one such presence of liquid water, the availability of UV light at the family of molecules: sulfidic anions, that is, sulfur-bearing
1Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. 2MIT Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. 3Medical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK. ª Sukrit Ranjan et al., 2018; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
1023 1024 RANJAN ET AL.
- - aqueous anions (e.g., hydrosulfide, HS ; bisulfite, HSO3 ; the atmosphere could supply adequate sulfidic reductant (and 2- sulfite, SO3 ). Our initial interest in these molecules was feedstock) on a global basis, it would reduce the requirements stimulated by the role they play in the prebiotic chemistry for parts (or all) of this reaction network to function, and would proposed by Patel et al. (2015), but our calculations are make it more compelling as an origins-of-life scenario. We applicable to studies of surficial prebiotic chemistry in evaluate this scenario. While our paper focuses on the chem- general. For discussion of the relevance of the surface en- istry of Patel et al. (2015) as a case study, our work can be used vironment and its attendant processes to prebiotic chemistry, to evaluate and improve the plausibility of any proposed sul- see, for example, Mulkidjanian et al. (2012), Walker et al. fidic anion-sensitive surficial prebiotic chemistry. Our methods (2012), Forsythe et al. (2015), Mutschler et al. (2015), Rapf can be adapted to study the prebiotic surficial concentrations of and Vaida (2016), Deamer and Damer (2017), He et al. other atmospherically sourced aqueous species. (2017). Our results are not relevant to deep-sea origin-of- life scenarios, such as McCollom and Seewald (2007), 2. Background Larowe and Regnier (2008), Martin et al. (2008), and Sojo 2.1. Plausible prebiotic levels of H S and SO et al. (2016). 2 2 We specifically explore the atmosphere as a planetary The abundances of H2S and SO2 in Earth’s atmosphere source for sulfidic anions through dissolution of volcanically are set by photochemistry and are sensitive to a variety of outgassed SO2 and H2S in small, shallow aqueous reservoirs factors. One of the most important of these factors is the like lakes. Prebiotic Earth’s atmosphere is thought to have outgassing rate of these compounds from volcanoes into the been anoxic and more reducing than modern Earth (Kasting, atmosphere. Absent biogenic sources, atmospheric photo- 2014), and volcanism levels have been hypothesized to have chemistry models typically assume abiotic SO2 outgassing been higher (Richter, 1985). Then the abundance of atmo- rates of 1–3 · 109 cm-2 s-1 (Kasting et al., 1989; Zahnle spheric H2S and especially SO2 should have been higher et al., 2006; Hu et al., 2013; Claire et al., 2014), consistent compared to modern-day levels, and aqueous reservoirs in with the measured modern mean volcanogenic SO2 out- equilibrium with the atmosphere would have dissolved some gassing rate of 1.7–2.4 · 109 cm-2 s-1 (Halmer et al., 2002). of these gases in accordance with Henry’s law, forming H2S emission rates are indirectly estimated and much less sulfidic anions through subsequent dissociation reactions. certain; they range from 3.1 · 108 to 7.7 · 109 cm-2 s-1.A We use simple equilibrium chemistry combined with liter- common assumption in atmospheric modeling is that SO2 ature photochemical modeling to estimate the concentrations and H2S are outgassed in a 10:1 ratio (e.g., Zahnle et al., of these sulfidic anions as a function of pSO2 and pH2S, and 2006; Claire et al., 2014). as a function of total sulfur outgassing flux. Elevated levels Early Earth is often hypothesized to have been charac-
of atmospheric sulfur can lead to the formation of UV- terized by higher levels of volcanic outgassing compared shielding gases and aerosols; consequently, we use radiative to modern Earth due to presumed higher levels of internal transfer calculations to constrain the surface UV radiation heat and tectonic activity. Models often assume that Archean environment as a function of total sulfur outgassing flux. UV SO2 outgassing rates were *3· modern (Richter, 1985; Kasting light is of interest to prebiotic chemists both as a potential et al., 1989; Zahnle et al., 2006). However, Halevy and stressor for abiogenesis (Sagan, 1973; Cockell, 2000), as a Head (2014) point out that during the emplacement of major potential eustressor for abiogenesis (Sagan and Khare, 1971; volcanogenic features such as the terrestrial basaltic plains, Mulkidjanian et al., 2003; Pascal, 2012; Sarker et al., 2013; sulfur outgassing rates as high as 1010 to 1011.5 cm-2 s-1 are Rapf and Vaida, 2016; Xu et al., 2016), and because of possible, with the upper limit on outgassing rate coming from evidence that the nucleobases evolved in a UV-rich envi- estimates of sulfur flux during emplacement of the Deccan ronment (Rios and Tor, 2013; Beckstead et al., 2016). Traps on Earth (Self et al., 2006). We apply our calculations to the case study of the cyano- No firm constraints exist for SO2 and H2S levels on sulfidic prebiotic systems chemistry of Patel et al. (2015). prebiotic Earth. Kasting et al. (1989) modeled a plausible Building on the work of Powner et al. (2009) and Ritson and prebiotic atmosphere of 2 bar CO2, 0.8 bar N2 under 0.75· Sutherland (2012), Patel et al. (2015) proposed a prebiotic re- present-day solar irradiation to account for the effects of the action network for the synthesis of activated ribonucleotides, faint young Sun at 3.9 Ga. Kasting et al. (1989) assumed short sugars, amino acids and lipid precursors from a limited set that sulfur was outgassed entirely as SO2 at a total sulfur 9 -2 -1 of feedstock molecules in aqueous solution under UV irradia- outgassing flux of /S = 3 · 10 cm s into an atmosphere tion (at 254 nm). This reaction network is of interest because of overlying an ocean saturated in SO2; this last condition the progress it makes toward the longstanding problem of nu- favors accumulation of SO2 in the atmosphere. Claire et al. cleotide synthesis, because it offers the promise of a common (2014) modeled an atmosphere of 0.99 bar N2 and 0.01 bar origin for many biomolecules, and because it imposes specific CO2, under irradiation by the 2.5 Ga Sun, with an SO2:H2S 8 10 -2 -1 geochemical requirements on its environment, which can be outgassing ratio of 10:1, for /S = 1 · 10 to 1 · 10 cm s . compared against what was available on early Earth to con- Hu et al. (2013) modeled an atmosphere consisting of 0.9 strain and improve the chemistry’s prebiotic plausibility (Higgs bar CO2 and 0.1 bar N2 under irradiation by the modern Sun, ˇ 9 and Lehman, 2015; Springsteen, 2015; Sponer et al., 2016). with an SO2:H2S emission ratio of 2, for /S = 3 · 10 to 13 -2 -1 Relevant to our work, the Patel et al. (2015) chemistry requires 1 · 10 cm s . The SO2 and H2S mixing ratios calculated sulfidic anions to proceed, as both a photoreductant and as a by these models are shown in Table 1; these mixing ratios feedstock for a subset of the network’s reactions. Patel et al. may be trivially converted to partial pressures by multi- (2015) proposed impactors as a source for the sulfidic anions; plying against the bulk atmospheric pressure. Note that the while possible, this scenario imposes an additional, local re- Claire et al. (2014) and Kasting et al. (1989) values are quirement for this chemistry to function. On the other hand, if surface mixing ratios, while the Hu et al. (2013) values are SULFIDIC ANIONS ON EARLY EARTH 1025
Table 1. Mixing Ratios of H2S and SO2 for Different Early Earth Models in the Literature and Different /S
Model rH2S rSO2 a 9 -2 -1 -10 -9 Kasting et al. (1989) , /S = 3 · 10 cm s 2 · 10 2 · 10 a 9 -2 -1 -11 -11 Claire et al. (2014) , /S = 3 · 10 cm s 1 · 10 5 · 10 b 9 -2 -1 -10 -10 Hu et al. (2013) , /S = 3 · 10 cm s 4 · 10 3 · 10 a 10 -2 -1 -11 -10 Claire et al. (2014) , /S = 1 · 10 cm s 3 · 10 1 · 10 b 10 -2 -1 -9 -10 Hu et al. (2013) , /S = 1 · 10 cm s 1 · 10 9 · 10 aSurface mixing ratio. bColumn-integrated mixing ratio.
column-integrated mixing ratios. Since H2S and SO2 abun- the gas at that interface. We assume the aqueous reservoir to dances tend to decrease with altitude due to losses from be well mixed and equilibrated throughout, so that the photochemistry, column-integrated mixing ratios should be concentration of [Z] is uniform throughout the reservoir at somewhat less than the surface mixing ratio. However, since the surficial value. If the reservoir is not well mixed, then density also decreases with altitude, mixing ratios at lower the dissolved gas concentration will vary deeper into the altitudes are more strongly weighted in the calculation of reservoir. Under our assumption of no non-atmospheric column-integrated mixing ratios, so the column-integrated source of Z,[Z] would decrease with depth for a poorly mixing ratio tends to be close to the surface mixing ratio. mixed aqueous reservoir. These models broadly agree that SO2 and H2Slevels This method of calculating [Z] is predicated on the as- were low and increase with sulfur emission rate, but their sumption that the aqueous body is in equilibrium with the estimates for rSO2 and rH2S disagree with each other by up atmosphere, that is, that the solution is saturated in Z and toafactorof400.TheHuet al. (2013) estimates are the sink and source of Z is outgassing and deposition from typically higher than the other estimates considered. The the atmosphere. This assumption is valid when there are no variation in these abundances demonstrates the sensitivity other sinks to drive the system away from equilibrium. We of SO2 and H2S levels to atmospheric parameters such as discuss the veracity of this assumption in Section 5.2. In composition and deposition velocities. Of these models, brief, this assumption is valid for shallow, well-mixed lakes
we find Hu et al. (2013) best matches the current fiducial that are not very acidic or hot, but not valid for deep, acidic, understanding of conditions on early Earth: an atmosphere or hot waters. For these scenarios, our calculations provide dominated by CO2 and N2, with volcanic outgassing of upper bounds on [Z]. both SO2 and H2S, with oceans not saturated in SO2 (as In aqueous solution, H2S undergoes the dissociation compared to possibilities for early Mars; see Halevy et al., reactions 2007). Hu et al. (2013) also has the advantage of calcu- lating atmospheric composition at higher values of sulfur þ H2S!HS þ H ,pKaH S,1 ¼ 7:05 (1) outgassing flux than Kasting et al. (1989) and Claire et al. 2 11.5 -2 -1 (2014), encompassing the 1 · 10 cm s flux which is 2 þ HS !S þ H ,pKa ¼ 19 (2) the upper limit of what Halevy and Head (2014) suggest H2S,2 possible for the emplacement of terrestrial basaltic plains. where the pK values are taken from Lide (2009) and can Hu et al. (2013) model processes including wet and dry a be related to the corresponding equilibrium constants by deposition, formation of H2SO4 and S8 aerosol, and pho- pK K ¼ 10 aX . Similarly, SO undergoes the reactions tochemistry and thermochemistry, with >1000 reactions aX 2 included in their reaction network. We therefore use Hu þ SO2 þ H2O ! HSO3 þ H ,pKa ¼ 1:86 (3) et al. (2013) as a guide when estimating H2SandSO2 SO2,1 levelsasafunctionofsulfuroutgassingflux(seeAp- HSO ! SO 2 þ Hþ,pK ¼ 7:2 (4) pendix A), with the understanding that further, prebiotic- 3 3 aSO2,2 Earth-specific modeling is required to constrain this relation with certainty. HSO þ SO ! HS O ,pK ¼ 1:5 (5) 3 2 2 5 aSO2,3 where the pK values are from Neta and Huie (1985). 3. Methods a To compute the abundances of these different sulfur- We consider a gas Z dissolving into a surficial aqueous bearing compounds as a function of [Z], we must make reservoir ((1 m deep), through which the UV light required assumptions as to the background chemistry of the aqueous for prebiotic biomolecule synthesis can penetrate (Ranjan reservoir they are dissolved in, especially its pH. If the and Sasselov, 2016); our archetypal such environment is a reservoir is completely unbuffered (e.g., pure water), its pH shallow lake. To isolate the effects of atmospheric supply of (and hence the speciation of S-bearing compounds) will be Z, we assume no other source of Z to be present (e.g., no completely determined by [Z]. At the other extreme, if the geothermal source at the lake bottom). Henry’s law states reservoir is completely buffered, its pH will be independent that the concentration of Z, [Z], in aqueous solution at the of [Z]. Natural waters typically lie in between these two air/water interface is proportional to the partial pressure of extremes; they are often buffered by mineral or atmospheric 1026 RANJAN ET AL.
1 interactions toward a certain pH , but with enough atmo- Where aC is the activity of species C. aC is related to the spheric supply their buffers can be overwhelmed. We ex- concentration of C,[C], by aC = cC[C], where cC is the activity plore these bracketing cases below, with the understanding coefficient (Misra, 2012). The use of activities instead of that the true speciation behavior in nature was most likely concentrations accounts for ion-ion and ion-H2O interactions. somewhere in between. c = 1 for a solution with an ionic strength of I = 0. For ionic strengths of 0–0.1 M, we calculate the activity coefficients for 3.1. Calculating dissolved gas concentration each species as a function of solution ionic strength using Extended Debye-Huckel theory (Debye and Huckel, 1923). We use Henry’s law, coupled with the well-mixed res- The activity coefficients in this formalism are calculated by ervoir assumption, to calculate the concentration of mole- cules dissolved from the atmosphere. Henry’s law states that 0:5 for a species Z, 2 I logðÞcC ¼ AzC 0:5 (12) 1 þ BaCI ½ Z ¼ H f (6) Z Z Here, A and B are constants that depend on the tempera- where H is the gas-specific Henry’s law constant and f is the ture, density, and dielectric constant of the solvent; we use Z Z -1/2 -1/2 ˚ -1 fugacity of the gas. Over the range of temperatures and pres- A = 0.5085 M and B = 0.3281 M A , corresponding to sures relevant to surficial prebiotic chemistry, the gases in our 25 C water (Misra, 2012) (our results are robust to this as- sumption; see Appendix D). z is the charge of species C. a study are ideal, and consequently fZ = pZ, the partial pressure of C C Z. We make this simplifying assumption throughout our study. is an ion-specific parameter with values related to the hy- dration radius of the aqueous species; we took our a values At T0 = 298.15 K, the Henry’s law constants for H2S and C from Misra (2012). We were unable to locate a value of aC SO2 dissolving in pure water are HH2S = 0.101 M/bar and - for HS O and consequently take c = 1 throughout. I is HSO = 1.34 M/bar, respectively. Increasing salinity tends to 2 5 HS2O5 2 the ionic strength of the solution, defined as decrease HG, a process known as salting out. Similarly, in- creasing temperature also tends to decrease HC. Our overall 2 results are insensitive to variations in temperature of 25 K I ¼ 0:5 SC½ C zC (13) from T0 and 0 £ [NaCl] £ 1 M; see Appendix C and Ap- pendix D.1. For simplicity, we therefore neglect the tem- We can combine these equations with the equation for perature- and salinity-dependence of Henry’s law. water dissociation: