The Role of P2Y12 Receptor Antagonists in Thrombogenesis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Role of P2Y12 Receptor Antagonists in Thrombogenesis Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2017 The Role of P2Y12 Receptor Antagonists in Thrombogenesis Reiner, Martin F Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-148533 Dissertation Published Version Originally published at: Reiner, Martin F. The Role of P2Y12 Receptor Antagonists in Thrombogenesis. 2017, University of Zurich, Faculty of Science. The Role of P2Y12 Receptor Antagonists in Thrombogenesis Dissertation zur Erlangung der naturwissenschaftlichen Doktorwürde (Dr. sc. nat.) vorgelegt der Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität Zürich von Martin Reiner aus Österreich Promotionskommission Prof. Dr. Olivier Devuyst (Vorsitz) Prof. Dr. Giovanni Guido Camici (Leitung der Dissertation) Prof. Dr. Carsten Wagner Prof. Dr. Thomas Felix Lüscher Prof. Dr. Jürg-Hans Beer Zürich, 2017 Acknowledgments First, I would like to thank my supervisor Prof. Dr. Giovanni G. Camici, who has introduced me to basic research, taught me numerous technical and manual skills and how to work with utmost accuracy. The close personal supervision I received over years has played a decisive role for my progress in basic research. Lastly, I am thankful for the motivation he gave me, if results diverged from my expectations and for successful trouble-shooting and apart from that, for some great time outside the laboratory. Next, I would like to thank Prof. Dr. med. Jürg-Hans Beer, who provided me close supervision during my basic research career and beyond. I am grateful for his countless ideas, and hypothesis that resulted in many projects and collaborations. I was inspired by his expertise and commitment to science, which motivated and encouraged me in many ways. Besides, I am glad for all the support I received whenever needed. Also, I am grateful to Prof. Dr. med. Thomas F. Lüscher, who has given me the chance to work in the laboratory and to be part of the team; who has contributed with his critical statements and with his endless knowledge to the successful outcomes of our projects. Further, I am thankful to Prof. Dr. med. Paul M. Vanhoutte who has influenced the direction of some projects with his critical and constructive remarks in regular meetings. Lastly, I would like to thank all members of the Center for Molecular Cardiology for numerous scientific exchanges and support concerning my experimental procedures and interpretations. 2 Table of contents 1 Zusammenfassung .......................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Hintergrund ................................................................................................................ 5 1.2 Material und Methoden ............................................................................................. 5 1.3 Ergebnisse ................................................................................................................. 6 1.4 Konklusionen ............................................................................................................. 6 2 Summary ........................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Background ................................................................................................................ 7 2.2 Material and methods ............................................................................................... 7 2.3 Results ........................................................................................................................ 8 2.4 Conclusions ............................................................................................................... 8 3 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 9 3.1 Epidemiology of cardiovascular disease ................................................................ 9 3.2 Endothelial function and dysfunction ................................................................... 10 Vessel wall ...................................................................................................................... 10 Endothelial function ......................................................................................................... 10 Endothelial dysfunction and reactive oxygen species ..................................................... 11 3.3 Atherosclerosis ....................................................................................................... 12 3.4 Tissue factor and initiation of the coagulation cascade ..................................... 14 Tissue factor ................................................................................................................... 14 Initiation of the coagulation cascade ............................................................................... 16 Experimental and clinical studies .................................................................................... 17 3.5 Platelets and the P2Y12 receptor ............................................................................ 17 Platelets .......................................................................................................................... 17 Adenosine diphosphate and the P2Y receptors .............................................................. 19 3.6 P2Y12 receptor antagonists .................................................................................... 20 The thienopyridines clopidogrel and prasugrel ............................................................... 21 The cyclopentyl-triazolo-pyrimidine ticagrelor ................................................................. 21 Pleiotropic effects of P2Y12 receptor antagonists ............................................................ 22 3.7 Atherothrombosis ................................................................................................... 23 Atherosclerotic plaques ................................................................................................... 23 Platelet adhesion, activation and recruitment ................................................................. 24 Initiation, amplification and propagation of the coagulation cascade .............................. 25 3.8 State of research in the field .................................................................................. 25 3 4 References ..................................................................................................................... 27 5 Original Articles ............................................................................................................. 45 6 Summary ......................................................................................................................... 93 6.1 Ticagrelor, but not clopidogrel active metabolite, reduces endothelial tissue factor via proteasomal degradation ............................................................................... 93 6.2 Ticagrelor, compared with clopidogrel, decreases endothelial tissue factor expression and arterial thrombosis in mice .................................................................. 94 6.3 Ticagrelor, unlike clopidogrel active metabolite, reduces thrombogenicity in atrial fibrillation patients .................................................................................................. 94 7 Discussion ...................................................................................................................... 96 7.1 Ticagrelor exhibits platelet-independent antithrombotic effects on the endothelium ...................................................................................................................... 96 7.2 Ticagrelor-mediated tissue factor reduction in endothelial cells and its underlying molecular mechanisms ................................................................................ 97 7.3 Ticagrelor and arterial thrombosis in vivo – relevance of endothelial tissue factor .................................................................................................................................. 99 Drug dosages of P2Y12 receptor antagonists in rodents ............................................. 101 8 Outlook ......................................................................................................................... 102 9 Abbreviations ............................................................................................................... 105 10 References ................................................................................................................. 107 11 Declaration of personal contributions to work ....................................................... 114 11.1 Ticagrelor, but not Clopidogrel, Reduces Arterial Thrombosis via Endothelial Tissue Factor Suppression ........................................................................................... 114 11.2 Ticagrelor, but not Clopidogrel Active Metabolite, Displays Antithrombotic Properties in the Left Atrial Endocardium ................................................................... 115 12 Curriculum Vitae ........................................................................................................ 116 4 1 Zusammenfassung 1.1 Hintergrund Der Adenosindiphosphat-Rezeptor P2Y12 bewirkt Plättchenaggregation
Recommended publications
  • Lysophosphatidic Acid and Its Receptors: Pharmacology and Therapeutic Potential in Atherosclerosis and Vascular Disease
    JPT-107404; No of Pages 13 Pharmacology & Therapeutics xxx (2019) xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Pharmacology & Therapeutics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/pharmthera Lysophosphatidic acid and its receptors: pharmacology and therapeutic potential in atherosclerosis and vascular disease Ying Zhou a, Peter J. Little a,b, Hang T. Ta a,c, Suowen Xu d, Danielle Kamato a,b,⁎ a School of Pharmacy, University of Queensland, Pharmacy Australia Centre of Excellence, Woolloongabba, QLD 4102, Australia b Department of Pharmacy, Xinhua College of Sun Yat-sen University, Tianhe District, Guangzhou 510520, China c Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia d Aab Cardiovascular Research Institute, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY 14642, USA article info abstract Available online xxxx Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) is a collective name for a set of bioactive lipid species. Via six widely distributed G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), LPA elicits a plethora of biological responses, contributing to inflammation, Keywords: thrombosis and atherosclerosis. There have recently been considerable advances in GPCR signaling especially Lysophosphatidic acid recognition of the extended role for GPCR transactivation of tyrosine and serine/threonine kinase growth factor G-protein coupled receptors receptors. This review covers LPA signaling pathways in the light of new information. The use of transgenic and Atherosclerosis gene knockout animals, gene manipulated cells, pharmacological LPA receptor agonists and antagonists have Gproteins fi β-arrestins provided many insights into the biological signi cance of LPA and individual LPA receptors in the progression Transactivation of atherosclerosis and vascular diseases.
    [Show full text]
  • Extracellular Adenosine Triphosphate and Adenosine in Cancer
    Oncogene (2010) 29, 5346–5358 & 2010 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0950-9232/10 www.nature.com/onc REVIEW Extracellular adenosine triphosphate and adenosine in cancer J Stagg and MJ Smyth Cancer Immunology Program, Sir Donald and Lady Trescowthick Laboratories, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) is actively released in the mulated the hypothesis of purinergic neurotransmission extracellular environment in response to tissue damage (Burnstock, 1972). Burnstock’s hypothesis that ATP and cellular stress. Through the activation of P2X and could be released by cells to perform intercellular P2Y receptors, extracellular ATP enhances tissue repair, signaling was initially met with skepticism, as it seemed promotes the recruitment of immune phagocytes and unlikely that a molecule that acts as an intracellular dendritic cells, and acts as a co-activator of NLR family, source of energy would also function as an extracellular pyrin domain-containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasomes. messenger. Nevertheless, Burnstock pursued his work The conversion of extracellular ATP to adenosine, in and, together with Che Su and John Bevan, reported contrast, essentially through the enzymatic activity of the that ATP was also released from sympathetic nerves ecto-nucleotidases CD39 and CD73, acts as a negative- during stimulation (Su et al., 1971). Three decades later, feedback mechanism to prevent excessive immune responses. following the cloning and characterization of ATP and Here we review the effects of extracellular ATP and adenosine adenosine cell surface receptors, purinergic signaling is a on tumorigenesis. First, we summarize the functions of well-established concept and constitutes an expanding extracellular ATP and adenosine in the context of tumor field of research in health and disease, including cancer immunity.
    [Show full text]
  • P2Y Purinergic Receptors, Endothelial Dysfunction, and Cardiovascular Diseases
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review P2Y Purinergic Receptors, Endothelial Dysfunction, and Cardiovascular Diseases Derek Strassheim 1, Alexander Verin 2, Robert Batori 2 , Hala Nijmeh 3, Nana Burns 1, Anita Kovacs-Kasa 2, Nagavedi S. Umapathy 4, Janavi Kotamarthi 5, Yash S. Gokhale 5, Vijaya Karoor 1, Kurt R. Stenmark 1,3 and Evgenia Gerasimovskaya 1,3,* 1 The Department of Medicine Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Research Laboratory, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; [email protected] (D.S.); [email protected] (N.B.); [email protected] (V.K.); [email protected] (K.R.S.) 2 Vascular Biology Center, Augusta University, Augusta, GA 30912, USA; [email protected] (A.V.); [email protected] (R.B.); [email protected] (A.K.-K.) 3 The Department of Pediatrics, Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; [email protected] 4 Center for Blood Disorders, Augusta University, Augusta, GA 30912, USA; [email protected] 5 The Department of BioMedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA; [email protected] (J.K.); [email protected] (Y.S.G.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-303-724-5614 Received: 25 August 2020; Accepted: 15 September 2020; Published: 18 September 2020 Abstract: Purinergic G-protein-coupled receptors are ancient and the most abundant group of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). The wide distribution of purinergic receptors in the cardiovascular system, together with the expression of multiple receptor subtypes in endothelial cells (ECs) and other vascular cells demonstrates the physiological importance of the purinergic signaling system in the regulation of the cardiovascular system.
    [Show full text]
  • NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Neuron Glia Biol
    NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Neuron Glia Biol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2006 May 1. NIH-PA Author ManuscriptPublished NIH-PA Author Manuscript in final edited NIH-PA Author Manuscript form as: Neuron Glia Biol. 2006 May ; 2(2): 125±138. Purinergic receptors activating rapid intracellular Ca2+ increases in microglia Alan R. Light1, Ying Wu2, Ronald W. Hughen1, and Peter B. Guthrie3 1 Department of Anesthesiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA 2 Oral Biology Program, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27510, USA 3 Scientific Review Administrator, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4142 Msc 7850, Bethesda, MD 20892-7850, USA Abstract We provide both molecular and pharmacological evidence that the metabotropic, purinergic, P2Y6, P2Y12 and P2Y13 receptors and the ionotropic P2X4 receptor contribute strongly to the rapid calcium response caused by ATP and its analogues in mouse microglia. Real-time PCR demonstrates that the most prevalent P2 receptor in microglia is P2Y6 followed, in order, by P2X4, P2Y12, and P2X7 = P2Y13. Only very small quantities of mRNA for P2Y1, P2Y2, P2Y4, P2Y14, P2X3 and P2X5 were found. Dose-response curves of the rapid calcium response gave a potency order of: 2MeSADP>ADP=UDP=IDP=UTP>ATP>BzATP, whereas A2P4 had little effect. Pertussis toxin partially blocked responses to 2MeSADP, ADP and UDP. The P2X4 antagonist suramin, but not PPADS, significantly blocked responses to ATP. These data indicate that P2Y6, P2Y12, P2Y13 and P2X receptors mediate much of the rapid calcium responses and shape changes in microglia to low concentrations of ATP, presumably at least partly because ATP is rapidly hydrolyzed to ADP.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Prostanoids on Human Platelet Function: an Overview
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Effect of Prostanoids on Human Platelet Function: An Overview Steffen Braune, Jan-Heiner Küpper and Friedrich Jung * Institute of Biotechnology, Molecular Cell Biology, Brandenburg University of Technology, 01968 Senftenberg, Germany; steff[email protected] (S.B.); [email protected] (J.-H.K.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 23 October 2020; Accepted: 23 November 2020; Published: 27 November 2020 Abstract: Prostanoids are bioactive lipid mediators and take part in many physiological and pathophysiological processes in practically every organ, tissue and cell, including the vascular, renal, gastrointestinal and reproductive systems. In this review, we focus on their influence on platelets, which are key elements in thrombosis and hemostasis. The function of platelets is influenced by mediators in the blood and the vascular wall. Activated platelets aggregate and release bioactive substances, thereby activating further neighbored platelets, which finally can lead to the formation of thrombi. Prostanoids regulate the function of blood platelets by both activating or inhibiting and so are involved in hemostasis. Each prostanoid has a unique activity profile and, thus, a specific profile of action. This article reviews the effects of the following prostanoids: prostaglandin-D2 (PGD2), prostaglandin-E1, -E2 and E3 (PGE1, PGE2, PGE3), prostaglandin F2α (PGF2α), prostacyclin (PGI2) and thromboxane-A2 (TXA2) on platelet activation and aggregation via their respective receptors. Keywords: prostacyclin; thromboxane; prostaglandin; platelets 1. Introduction Hemostasis is a complex process that requires the interplay of multiple physiological pathways. Cellular and molecular mechanisms interact to stop bleedings of injured blood vessels or to seal denuded sub-endothelium with localized clot formation (Figure1).
    [Show full text]
  • Activation of the Murine EP3 Receptor for PGE2 Inhibits Camp Production and Promotes Platelet Aggregation
    Activation of the murine EP3 receptor for PGE2 inhibits cAMP production and promotes platelet aggregation Jean-Etienne Fabre, … , Thomas M. Coffman, Beverly H. Koller J Clin Invest. 2001;107(5):603-610. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI10881. Article The importance of arachidonic acid metabolites (termed eicosanoids), particularly those derived from the COX-1 and COX-2 pathways (termed prostanoids), in platelet homeostasis has long been recognized. Thromboxane is a potent agonist, whereas prostacyclin is an inhibitor of platelet aggregation. In contrast, the effect of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) on platelet aggregation varies significantly depending on its concentration. Low concentrations of PGE2 enhance platelet aggregation, whereas high PGE2 levels inhibit aggregation. The mechanism for this dual action of PGE2 is not clear. This study shows that among the four PGE2 receptors (EP1–EP4), activation of EP3 is sufficient to mediate the proaggregatory actions of low PGE2 concentration. In contrast, the prostacyclin receptor (IP) mediates the inhibitory effect of higher PGE2 concentrations. Furthermore, the relative activation of these two receptors, EP3 and IP, regulates the intracellular level of cAMP and in this way conditions the response of the platelet to aggregating agents. Consistent with these findings, loss of the EP3 receptor in a model of venous inflammation protects against formation of intravascular clots. Our results suggest that local production of PGE2 during an inflammatory process can modulate ensuing platelet responses. Find the latest version: https://jci.me/10881/pdf Activation of the murine EP3 receptor for PGE2 inhibits cAMP production and promotes platelet aggregation Jean-Etienne Fabre,1 MyTrang Nguyen,1 Krairek Athirakul,2 Kenneth Coggins,1 John D.
    [Show full text]
  • Blood Platelet Adenosine Receptors As Potential Targets for Anti-Platelet Therapy
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Blood Platelet Adenosine Receptors as Potential Targets for Anti-Platelet Therapy Nina Wolska and Marcin Rozalski * Department of Haemostasis and Haemostatic Disorders, Chair of Biomedical Science, Medical University of Lodz, 92-215 Lodz, Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +48-504-836-536 Received: 30 September 2019; Accepted: 1 November 2019; Published: 3 November 2019 Abstract: Adenosine receptors are a subfamily of highly-conserved G-protein coupled receptors. They are found in the membranes of various human cells and play many physiological functions. Blood platelets express two (A2A and A2B) of the four known adenosine receptor subtypes (A1,A2A, A2B, and A3). Agonization of these receptors results in an enhanced intracellular cAMP and the inhibition of platelet activation and aggregation. Therefore, adenosine receptors A2A and A2B could be targets for anti-platelet therapy, especially under circumstances when classic therapy based on antagonizing the purinergic receptor P2Y12 is insufficient or problematic. Apart from adenosine, there is a group of synthetic, selective, longer-lasting agonists of A2A and A2B receptors reported in the literature. This group includes agonists with good selectivity for A2A or A2B receptors, as well as non-selective compounds that activate more than one type of adenosine receptor. Chemically, most A2A and A2B adenosine receptor agonists are adenosine analogues, with either adenine or ribose substituted by single or multiple foreign substituents. However, a group of non-adenosine derivative agonists has also been described. This review aims to systematically describe known agonists of A2A and A2B receptors and review the available literature data on their effects on platelet function.
    [Show full text]
  • The Interaction of Selective A1 and A2A Adenosine Receptor Antagonists with Magnesium and Zinc Ions in Mice: Behavioural, Biochemical and Molecular Studies
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Article The Interaction of Selective A1 and A2A Adenosine Receptor Antagonists with Magnesium and Zinc Ions in Mice: Behavioural, Biochemical and Molecular Studies Aleksandra Szopa 1,* , Karolina Bogatko 1, Mariola Herbet 2 , Anna Serefko 1 , Marta Ostrowska 2 , Sylwia Wo´sko 1, Katarzyna Swi´ ˛ader 3, Bernadeta Szewczyk 4, Aleksandra Wla´z 5, Piotr Skałecki 6, Andrzej Wróbel 7 , Sławomir Mandziuk 8, Aleksandra Pochodyła 3, Anna Kudela 2, Jarosław Dudka 2, Maria Radziwo ´n-Zaleska 9, Piotr Wla´z 10 and Ewa Poleszak 1,* 1 Chair and Department of Applied and Social Pharmacy, Laboratory of Preclinical Testing, Medical University of Lublin, 1 Chod´zkiStreet, PL 20–093 Lublin, Poland; [email protected] (K.B.); [email protected] (A.S.); [email protected] (S.W.) 2 Chair and Department of Toxicology, Medical University of Lublin, 8 Chod´zkiStreet, PL 20–093 Lublin, Poland; [email protected] (M.H.); [email protected] (M.O.); [email protected] (A.K.) [email protected] (J.D.) 3 Chair and Department of Applied and Social Pharmacy, Medical University of Lublin, 1 Chod´zkiStreet, PL 20–093 Lublin, Poland; [email protected] (K.S.);´ [email protected] (A.P.) 4 Department of Neurobiology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Maj Institute of Pharmacology, 12 Sm˛etnaStreet, PL 31–343 Kraków, Poland; [email protected] 5 Department of Pathophysiology, Medical University of Lublin, 8 Jaczewskiego Street, PL 20–090 Lublin, Poland; [email protected] Citation: Szopa, A.; Bogatko, K.; 6 Department of Commodity Science and Processing of Raw Animal Materials, University of Life Sciences, Herbet, M.; Serefko, A.; Ostrowska, 13 Akademicka Street, PL 20–950 Lublin, Poland; [email protected] M.; Wo´sko,S.; Swi´ ˛ader, K.; Szewczyk, 7 Second Department of Gynecology, 8 Jaczewskiego Street, PL 20–090 Lublin, Poland; B.; Wla´z,A.; Skałecki, P.; et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Adenosine A1 Receptor-Mediated Activation of Phospholipase C in Cultured Astrocytes Depends on the Level of Receptor Expression
    The Journal of Neuroscience, July 1, 1997, 17(13):4956–4964 Adenosine A1 Receptor-Mediated Activation of Phospholipase C in Cultured Astrocytes Depends on the Level of Receptor Expression Knut Biber,1,2 Karl-Norbert Klotz,3 Mathias Berger,1 Peter J. Gebicke-Ha¨ rter,1 and Dietrich van Calker1 1Department of Psychiatry, University of Freiburg, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany, 2Institute for Biology II, University of Freiburg, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany, and 3Institute for Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Wu¨ rzburg, D-97078 Wu¨ rzburg, Germany Adenosine A1 receptors induce an inhibition of adenylyl cyclase dependent on the expression level of A1 receptor, and (4) the via G-proteins of the Gi/o family. In addition, simultaneous potentiating effect on PLC activity is unrelated to extracellular stimulation of A1 receptors and of receptor-mediated activation glutamate. of phospholipase C (PLC) results in a synergistic potentiation of Taken together, our data support the notion that bg subunits PLC activity. Evidence has accumulated that Gbg subunits are the relevant signal transducers for A1 receptor-mediated mediate this potentiating effect. However, an A1 receptor- PLC activation in rat astrocytes. Because of the lower affinity of mediated increase in extracellular glutamate was suggested to bg, as compared with a subunits, more bg subunits are re- be responsible for the potentiating effect in mouse astrocyte quired for PLC activation. Therefore, only in cultures with higher cultures. We have investigated the synergistic activation of PLC levels of adenosine A1 receptors is the release of bg subunits by adenosine A1 and a1 adrenergic receptors in primary cul- via Gi/o activation sufficient to stimulate PLC.
    [Show full text]
  • Purinergic Receptors Brian F
    Chapter 21 Purinergic receptors Brian F. King and Geoffrey Burnstock 21.1 Introduction The term purinergic receptor (or purinoceptor) was first introduced to describe classes of membrane receptors that, when activated by either neurally released ATP (P2 purinoceptor) or its breakdown product adenosine (P1 purinoceptor), mediated relaxation of gut smooth muscle (Burnstock 1972, 1978). P2 purinoceptors were further divided into five broad phenotypes (P2X, P2Y, P2Z, P2U, and P2T) according to pharmacological profile and tissue distribution (Burnstock and Kennedy 1985; Gordon 1986; O’Connor et al. 1991; Dubyak 1991). Thereafter, they were reorganized into families of metabotropic ATP receptors (P2Y, P2U, and P2T) and ionotropic ATP receptors (P2X and P2Z) (Dubyak and El-Moatassim 1993), later redefined as extended P2Y and P2X families (Abbracchio and Burnstock 1994). In the early 1990s, cDNAs were isolated for three heptahelical proteins—called P2Y1, P2Y2, and P2Y3—with structural similarities to the rhodopsin GPCR template. At first, these three GPCRs were believed to correspond to the P2Y, P2U, and P2T receptors. However, the com- plexity of the P2Y receptor family was underestimated. At least 15, possibly 16, heptahelical proteins have been associated with the P2Y receptor family (King et al. 2001, see Table 21.1). Multiple expression of P2Y receptors is considered the norm in all tissues (Ralevic and Burnstock 1998) and mixtures of P2 purinoceptors have been reported in central neurones (Chessell et al. 1997) and glia (King et al. 1996). The situation is compounded by P2Y protein dimerization to generate receptor assemblies with subtly distinct pharmacological proper- ties from their constituent components (Filippov et al.
    [Show full text]
  • G Protein-Coupled Receptor Heteromers Are Key Players in Substance Use Disorder
    G protein-coupled receptor heteromers are key players in substance use disorder. Lyes Derouiche, Dominique Massotte To cite this version: Lyes Derouiche, Dominique Massotte. G protein-coupled receptor heteromers are key players in substance use disorder.. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, Oxford: Elsevier Ltd., 2019, 106, 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.09.026. hal-02264889 HAL Id: hal-02264889 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02264889 Submitted on 18 Mar 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. G Protein-Coupled Receptor Heteromers Are Key Players in Substance Use Disorder. Lyes Derouiche and Dominique Massotte* Institut des Neurosciences Cellulaires et Integratives, UPR 3212 5 rue Blaise Pascal, F-67000 Strasbourg, France Highlights Heteromers are functional entities with behavioral impact Heteromers are increasingly recognized as key players in substance use disorder Heteromers may be part of larger functional multiprotein complexes Heteromers represent emerging innovative therapeutic targets Funding sources: The work was received the financial support of the Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (DPA20140129364), the CNRS and the University of Strasbourg. L. Derouiche was the recipient of an IDEX post-doctoral fellowship of the University of Strasbourg. * Author for correspondence : Dominique Massotte, INCI UPR 3212, 5 rue Blaise Pascal, F-67000 Strasbourg, France, email: [email protected] 1 Abstract G protein–coupled receptors (GPCR) represent the largest family of membrane proteins in the human genome.
    [Show full text]
  • P2Y12-Dependent Modulation of ADP-Evoked Calcium Responses in Human Monocytes
    P2Y12-dependent modulation of ADP-evoked calcium responses in human monocytes Jonathon J. Micklewright A thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Science by Research University of East Anglia School of Biological Sciences February 2018 © This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with the author and that use of any information derived there from must be in accordance with current UK Copyright Law. In addition, any quotation or extract must include full attribution. Abstract The Gi-coupled, ADP-activated P2Y12 receptor is well-characterised as playing a key role in platelet activation via crosstalk with P2Y1. A crucial aspect of P2Y12-P2Y1 crosstalk in platelets involves ADP-induced intracellular calcium (Ca2+) mobilisation, however there is limited knowledge on the role of P2Y12 in ADP-evoked Ca2+ responses in other blood cells. Here, we investigate the expression of P2Y12 in human monocytes and the contribution of P2Y12 in THP-1 ADP-evoked Ca2+ responses. RT-PCR analysis showed that all ADP-binding P2Y receptors were expressed in THP-1 monocytes at the mRNA level, with P2Y12 expressed in CD14+ primary monocytes. P2Y12 protein was found to be expressed in THP-1 cells, using immunocytochemistry. ADP- evoked Ca2+ responses in fura-2-loaded THP-1 cells were completely abolished by a sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase inhibitor, and by a phospholipase C inhibitor, indicating that these Ca2+ responses are mediated through GPCRs. Ca2+ responses induced by ADP were significantly reduced by the P2Y12 inhibitors ticagrelor and PSB- 0739 and by the P2Y6 antagonist MRS2578, but not by P2Y1 or P2Y13 inhibitors.
    [Show full text]