Timeforavisiblehandbook.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Timeforavisiblehandbook.Pdf Time for a Visible Hand The Initiative For Policy Dialogue Series The Initiative for Policy Dialogue (IPD) brings together the top voices in devel- opment to address some of the most pressing and controversial debates in economic policy today. The IPD book series approaches topics such as capital market liberalization, macroeconomics, environmental economics, and trade policy from a balanced perspective, presenting alternatives, and analyzing their consequences on the basis of the best available research. Written in a language accessible to policymakers and civil society, this series will rekindle the debate on economic policy and facilitate a more democratic discussion of development around the world. OTHER TITLES PUBLISHED BY OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS IN THIS SERIES Fair Trade for All Joseph E. Stiglitz and Andrew Charlton Economic Development and Environmental Sustainability Ramo´nLo´pez and Michael A. Toman Stability with Growth Joseph E. Stiglitz, Jose´ Antonio Ocampo, Shari Spiegel, Ricardo Ffrench-Davis, and Deepak Nayyar The Washington Consensus Reconsidered Narcis Serra and Joseph E. Stiglitz Capital Market Liberalization and Development Jose´ Antonio Ocampo and Joseph E. Stiglitz Industrial Policy and Development Mario Cimoli, Giovanni Dosi and Joseph E. Stiglitz Time for a Visible Hand Lessons from the 2008 World Financial Crisis Edited by Stephany Griffith-Jones, Jose´ Antonio Ocampo, and Joseph E. Stiglitz 1 1 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX26DP Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offices in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries Published in the United States by Oxford University Press Inc., New York # Oxford University Press 2010 The moral rights of the authors have been asserted Database right Oxford University Press (maker) First published 2010 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above You must not circulate this book in any other binding or cover and you must impose the same condition on any acquirer British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Data available Typeset by SPI Publisher Services, Pondicherry, India Printed in Great Britain on acid-free paper by Clays Ltd., St Ives Plc ISBN 978–0–19–957880–1 (Hbk) 978–0–19–957881–8 (Pbk) 13579108642 Acknowledgments The book is the outcome of the research of a task force on Financial Market Regulation of the Initiative for Policy Dialogue (IPD) at Columbia University, directed by Stephany Griffith-Jones, Jose´ Antonio Ocampo, and Joseph Stiglitz. IPD is a global network of over 250 economists, researchers, and practitioners committed to furthering understanding of the development process. We would like to thank all task force members, whose participation in provocative dialogues and debates on financial market regulation informed the content of this book. We gratefully acknowledge the contributions of the authors. In addition, we acknowledge the dedication of IDP staff members Sarah Green and Farah Siddique, who helped organize task force meetings and coordinated the various stages of production of the book. Our thanks also to former staff member Ariel Schwartz and IPD interns Alexander Berenbeim, Sarah Bishop, Vitaly Bord, John Conway Boyd, Eduardo Gonzalez, Kevin E. Jason, Emily-Anne Patt, and Kohei Yoshida. We thank our editor Sarah Caro and the staff of Oxford University Press for bringing this book into publication. We are most grateful to the Brooks World Poverty Institute and the Ford Foundation for funding the meeting of the IPD Task Force on Financial Market Regulation, out of which this book was conceived. Finally, we acknowledge the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, and GTZ for their generous support of IPD’s work. This page intentionally left blank Contents List of Figures ix List of Tables x Contributors xi Acronyms xiv 1. Introduction 1 Stephany Griffith-Jones, Jose´ Antonio Ocampo, and Joseph E. Stiglitz Part I. The Crisis in the United States 2. The Financial Crisis of 2007–8 and its Macroeconomic Consequences 19 Joseph E. Stiglitz 3. Sub-Prime Finance: Yes, We are Still in Kansas 50 Gerard Caprio, Jr. 4. Background Considerations to a Re-Regulation of the US Financial System: Third Time a Charm? Or Strike Three? 62 Jan Kregel 5. Responding to the Crisis 76 Joseph E. Stiglitz Part II. Reforming Financial Regulation 6. Central Banks, Liquidity, and the Banking Crisis 101 Philip Turner 7. Agenda and Criteria for Financial Regulatory Reform 126 Jane D’Arista and Stephany Griffith-Jones 8. The Role of Policy and Banking Supervision in the Light of the Credit Crisis 150 Avinash D. Persaud vii Contents 9. How, If At All, Should Credit Rating Agencies (CRAs) Be Regulated? 164 C. A. E. Goodhart 10. Credit Default Swaps: The Key to Financial Reform 185 Perry Mehrling 11. Governing the Global Regulatory System 200 Marion Williams Part III. Developing Country Perspectives 12. The Management of Capital Flows and Financial Vulnerability in Asia 219 Yılmaz Akyu¨z 13. Regulation of the Financial Sector in Developing Countries: Lessons from the 2008 Financial Crisis 242 Y. V. Reddy 14. Economic Development and the International Financial System 253 Roberto Frenkel and Martin Rapetti 15. The Accumulation of International Reserves as a Defense Strategy 269 Fernando J. Cardim de Carvalho Part IV. Reforming the Global Monetary System 16. Reforming the Global Reserve System 289 Jose´ Antonio Ocampo 17. A Modest Proposal for International Monetary Reform 314 Bruce Greenwald and Joseph E. Stiglitz Index 345 viii List of Figures 6.1 Central bank total assets 105 6.2 Open market operations and lending: amounts outstanding 106 6.3 Interbank and policy interest rates 107 6.4 Central bank assets and repos 107 6.5 Measures of real interest rates 111 6.6 Three-month LIBOR–OIS spreads 119 9.1 Fan chart showing the probability of default over time 174 16.1 US current account balance and real exchange rate 294 16.2 Reserves minus gold 301 16.3 Balance of payments: developing countries 304 17.1 Global double deficits, 1980–2006 317 17.2 Current account and government balances: United States, 1980–2006 318 17.3 Current account and government balances: Japan, 1980–2006 319 17.4 Current account and government balances: United Kingdom, 1980–2006 319 17.5 Current account and government balances: Germany, 1980–2006 320 17.6 Current account and government balances: Italy, 1980–2006 320 17.7 Current account and government balances: France, 1980–2006 321 17.8 Current account and government balances: Canada, 1980–2006 321 17.9 Total reserves minus gold 326 17.10 Total reserves minus gold spread 327 17.11 Central bank gold holdings 327 ix List of Tables 6.1 Federal Reserve provision of dollar funding under inter-central bank swap arrangements 119 7.1 Outstanding assets held by financial sectors 133 10.1 Credit risk transfer using “mirror” bonds 191 10.2 Credit risk transfer using CDS 192 10.3 Regulatory arbitrage 195 12.1 Private capital flows, current account balances and changes in reserves in emerging markets 222 12.2 Current account and reserves 228 15.1 Balance of payments and international reserves: all developing countries 276 15.2 Debt indicators: emerging and developing economies 278 15.3 Current account balances: selected emerging economies 280 16.1 Accumulation of foreign exchange reserves, 1981—2007 302 17.1 Pairwise Granger causality tests 322 x Contributors Yilmaz Akyu¨z was the Director of the Division on Globalization and Develop- ment Strategies at the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) until his retirement in August 2003. He was the principal author and head of the team preparing the Trade and Development Report, and UNCTAD coordinator of research support to developing countries (the Group-of-24) in the IMF and the World Bank on International Monetary and Financial Issues. He is now Special Economic Advisor to South Centre, an Intergovernmental Think Tank of the Developing Countries, based in Geneva. Gerard Caprio is Professor of Economics at Williams College and Chair of the Center for Development Economics there. From 1998 until January 2006, he was the Director for Policy in the World Bank’s Financial Sector Vice Presidency. He served as Head of the financial sector research team in the Bank’s Develop- ment Research Group from 1995–2003, and previously was the Lead Financial Economist there. Fernando J. Cardim de Carvalho is a professor of economics at the Institute of Economics at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro. A former chairman of the National Association of Graduate Schools of Economics of Brazil, he has done consulting work for, among others, the National Development Bank of Brazil, the National Association of Financial Institutions of Brazil (ANDIMA), CEPAL, G-24 and NGOs like Ibase (Brazil), Action Aid USA and WEED (World Economy, Ecology and Development—Germany). Jane D’Arista is an economic analyst with the Financial Markets Center. She has written on the history of US monetary policy and financial regulation, interna- tional and domestic monetary systems and capital flows to emerging economies.
Recommended publications
  • Appendix C3. Public Engagement Record: December 2019
    Appendix C3 Public Engagement Record: December 10, 2019 to September 16, 2020 Public Engagement Record: December 10, 2019 to September 16, 2020 • Website Screenshots Public Engagement Record: December 10, 2019 to September 16, 2020 • Ask-A-Question Submissions Ask A Question – January 23 to September 16, 2020 Comment title Comment body Response Future Is the western terminus of the line to be built so that it would be able to be We are currently advancing plans for the line between Exhibition/Ontario expansion extended north west at a later date? Thank you Place and the Ontario Science Centre. However, these plans don’t preclude future expansions that may be presented to improve access and meet demand. Thorncliffe Park Where is the station in relation to Overlea Blvd Teams are analyzing the 15 stations identified in the Initial Business Case to Station determine whether or not they should be built, looking at factors like the potential number of users, ease of construction, and cost, to name a few. Findings will be presented in the Preliminary Design Business Case, which we are aiming to complete by summer 2020.By using the GO corridor and building bridges across the Don River instead of tunneling underneath it, a route that is approximately twice the length of the Relief Line South can be built at a similar cost. Also, using the GO corridor will allow people to more easily connect between GO and TTC services that will both be accessible by street level, saving time compared to connections that would lead people into deep underground stations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vision of Montreal's Downtown at the Core of a Polycentric City And
    Page 1 Montreal, November 3, 2016 Anton Dubrau The Vision of Montreal’s Downtown at the Core of a Poly­Centric City And How to Get there With Public Transit A Contribution to the Office de la Consultation Publique de Montreal on the “Strategie Centre­Ville”. Page 2 1. Intro 4 2. What is a Poly­Central City? 4 3. A Transit System for a Poly­Centric City: An S­Bahn 6 4. What would an S­Bahn look like in Montreal? 10 5. The REM ­ The North­South S­Bahn? 15 5.1. Intro 15 5.2. Low Capacity 17 5.4. Monopolization of Mount Royal Tunnel 20 5.4.1. A Second Tunnel? 25 5.4.2. A Solution: Shared System of REM, AMT, VIA 26 5.5. Bad Transfers At Gare Centrale 29 5.5.1. REM ⟷ Orange Line 29 5.5.2. Improving the transfer REM ⟷ Orange Line 30 5.5.3. Further Improving the transfer ­ Moving a Metro Station 31 5.5.4. REM ⟷ Reneve­Levesque 32 5.7. REM: bypassing Griffintown, the Old Port, Pt­St­Charles 35 5.8. Summary 35 5.9. Ridership 35 5.10. An Alternative: CN Rail Viaduct 36 5.11. A Note on Cost 40 6. Summary 41 7. APPENDICES 42 7.1. APPENDIX A: Description of a Shared System between AMT, VIA & REM 42 7.1.1. Frequency, Dwell times & Schedule 42 7.1.2. Track Layout and Station 47 7.1.3. The McGill Station 47 7.1.4. Signalling system / automation 48 7.1.5.
    [Show full text]
  • Time Is Not a Military Rank”: the Production of History and the Liberalization of the Spanish Railways by Natalia Buier
    “Time is not a military rank”: The production of history and the liberalization of the Spanish railways By Natalia Buier Submitted to Central European University Department of Sociology and Social Anthropology In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Supervisors: Professor Don Kalb Professor Violetta Zentai CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2016 Contents Introduction: In defense of a materialist anthropology of memory .................................................................... 5 i. Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................. 5 ii. Towards a materialist anthropology of memory ....................................................................................... 10 The production of history ......................................................................................................................................... 13 The production of history and historical memory ......................................................................................... 19 The production of history and hegemony .......................................................................................................... 25 The production of history and the anthropology of class ............................................................................ 29 A case in context ..........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Minerva Plan a Rail Strategy for Southeast Queensland Foreword
    The Minerva Plan a rail strategy for Southeast Queensland Foreword The history of rail in Australia strategy since the Connecting Queensland will be addressed, is dotted with pivotal moments SEQ 2031 regional transport describing the envisioned which have had far-reaching plan was dis-endorsed. It is in development of the network implications. From Bradfield’s this absence of a rail strategy over the coming decades – vision and predominant that Cross River Rail has with a modified Cross River Rail realisation of his railway been allowed to come to its at its core. scheme for Sydney which has current form, with no guiding served our biggest city for framework with which to This document is the Minerva nearly a century, to the pre- measure its suitability in the Plan, a rail strategy for Federation break of gauge long term. Southeast Queensland. The debacle which took almost one Minerva Plan will revisit hundred years to resolve, the Major inner-city rail previous works, including long term implications – both infrastructure has a lifespan Connecting SEQ 2031, to good and bad – of railway extending beyond a century, present a rail strategy that planning decisions are clear with the potential to increase is ‘familiar, yet different’, to see. In 2020, Queensland is the efficiency and liveability and for which considerable facing its own pivotal moment of a city, and it is important investigation has already been with the design of the Cross that the project is designed undertaken. River Rail project. Cross River to deliver on these objectives. Rail has been approved, had Unfortunately, Cross River Rail This plan will set out the contracts signed, and early is not fit for purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • LCRT Low-Clearance Rapid Transit
    Generalized Feasibility Study LCRT (Low-Clearance Rapid Transit) Harald Buschbacher LCRT Low-clearance Rapid Transit Fast, reliable high-performance urban transport at moderate costs for the city budget Generalized Feasibility Study Generalized Feasibility Study LCRT (Low-Clearance Rapid Transit) Contents 1. Introduction and Initial Situation ............................................................................. 5 1.1. Basic Idea ................................................................................................... 5 1.2. Initial Situation: Average Speed of Different Tram and Metro Models ............................. 5 1.3. Application areas of LCRT ................................................................................ 8 1.4. Task and structure of this study ......................................................................... 9 2. Technical Feasibility and track / road geometry parameters ............................................ 9 2.1. Height difference between LCRT line and crossroad ................................................. 9 2.1.1 Inner height .......................................................................................... 10 2.1.2 Roof thickness and height of rooftop equipment ............................................... 10 2.1.3 Catenary height including electrical clearance ................................................. 10 2.1.3.1 Main variant with two pantographs at the vehicle’s ends ................................ 10 2.1.3.2 Alternative solutions ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Incentivising Better Capacity Management in GB Rail: Case Study Evidence from Other Industries and Railways: ORR/CT/14-63
    Incentivising better capacity management in GB rail: Case study evidence from other industries and railways: ORR/CT/14-63 FINAL REPORT 27th March 2015 Prepared for: Prepared by: The Office of Rail Regulation Credo Business Consulting LLP One Kemble Street 12 Arthur Street London London WC2B 4AN EC4R 9AB Incentivising Better Capacity Management in GB Rail NOTICE This report has been prepared by Credo Business Consulting LLP (“Credo”) on the basis of the Agreement signed with the Office of Rail Regulation, One Kemble Street, London WC2B 4AN (“ORR”) on the 22nd January 2014. This report has been prepared solely for the benefit and information of the ORR and any parties mentioned in the Agreement. We will not accept responsibility or liability to any other party to whom the report may be shown or who may acquire a copy of the report. All interviews, observations, analysis and forecasts contained in the report have been made on the basis of the information available at the time of the assignment and have been prepared as at 27th March 2015. We have not undertaken to update our report for events or circumstances arising after that date. Credo cannot be liable for any subsequent changes. In preparing the report, Credo relied upon, and assumed the accuracy of, information obtained from a variety of sources, including but not limited to: interviews with selected TOCs, Network Rail staff, industry experts, representatives of international railways (specifically Vancouver SkyTrain, Eurostar International Limited and Kombiverkehr), and representatives of other industries (aerospace, telecommunications and highways). We have made selected use of financial, government and economic statistics and forecasts; management statements and estimates; published market research; published academic and economic research and public filings of financial information.
    [Show full text]
  • CB Tra D Pe Anspo Edestr Ort a Rian C Ccess Cong S Gestion – P Publ
    Tivendale Transport Consulting CBD Pedestrian Congestion – PPublic Transport Access City of Melbourne Melbourne January 2012 Version 3.0 This document is confidential and is intended solely for the use and information of the client to whom it is addressed. DM 7884999 This page is intentionally blank Date: 30 May 2014 Filename: COM_SERVICE_PROD-#8045493- Prepared for CLIENT NAME i v1-Walking_Plan_Technical_Report_- _Pedestrian_Congestion.DOCX Executive Summary The City of Melbourne currently attracts 800,000 people each weekday. This figure is expected to grow to 1.2 million people each weekday by 2030. A significant proportion of these additional trips will be made on the city’s rail networks. Having used the rail network (both metro and tram) most passengers then need to walk through the public realm to reach their final destination. This study is focused on areas of high congestion and access to transport nodes in peak periods. The aim is to ensure that the public realm which provides access to these transport nodes remains safe and functional as passenger demand and pedestrian volumes increase. In some locations, peak pedestrian demands on footpaths and pedestrian crossings are already outstripping supply of space for pedestrians to move. The City of Melbourne has identified eight transport nodes that generate pedestrian congestion points in weekday peak periods. These include all the City Loop Metro Stations and three platform tram stops (Federation Square, Melbourne University and Town Hall). In these locations there are concerns that overcrowding of pedestrians is not just detracting from the CBD economy and quality of transport but is also creating safety problems (for example when pedestrians resort to walking along the traffic lanes because there is no space remaining on the footpath).
    [Show full text]
  • Crossrail 2 Consultation Analysis | Report
    Crossrail 2 Consultation Transport for London Analysis Report Our ref: 22909201 March 2016 Client ref: Crossrail 2 Consultation Transport for London Analysis Report Our ref: 22909201 March 2016 Client ref: Prepared by: Prepared for: Steer Davies Gleave Transport for London 28-32 Upper Ground Consultation Delivery Team London SE1 9PD 4th floor, South Wing, 55 Broadway, London, SW1H 0BD +44 (0)20 7910 5000 www.steerdaviesgleave.com Version 7, reissued 29/09/2016. Steer Davies Gleave has prepared this work for Transport for London. This work may only be used within the context and scope of work for which Steer Davies Gleave was commissioned and may not be relied upon in part or whole by any third party or be used for any other purpose. Any person choosing to use any part of this work without the express and written permission of Steer Davies Gleave shall be deemed to confirm their agreement to indemnify Steer Davies Gleave for all loss or damage resulting therefrom. Steer Davies Gleave has prepared this work using professional practices and procedures using information available to it at the time and as such any new information could alter the validity of the results and conclusions made. Crossrail 2 Consultation Analysis | Report Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 5 Background ................................................................................................................................... 5 Autumn 2015 Consultation
    [Show full text]