DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Communications Commission Record DA 95-1235

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Communications Commission Record DA 95-1235 10 FCC Red No. 13 Federal Communications Commission Record DA 95-1235 TCI Cablevision of San Jose, CA Before the Redwood City, CA, et al. DA 95-656 Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 TCI Cablevision of Northwestern Ohio, Inc. Archbold, OH, et al. DA 95-657 In the Matter of TCI Cablevision of Merced County Petitions for Stay of Action Merced, CA DA 95-715 Pending Resolution of TCI of Central Florida Applications for Review or Altamonte Sp, FL, et al. DA 95-815 Petitions for Reconsideration TCI of South Dade Bresnan Communications Kendall, FL DA 95-818 Sault Ste. Marie, MIDA 95-534 TCI Cablevision of California. Inc. Cablevision/V Cable Redlands, CA, et al. DA 95-828 Brook Park, OH et al. DA 95-487, DA 95-485, DA 95-484, DA 95-501. DA95-486 Time Warner Champaign-Urbana. IL DA 95-290 Comcast Queens, NY DA 95-429 Baltimore, MD DA 94-1153 Tallahassee, FL DA 94-1480 Times Mirror Orange County, CA DA 94-1335 Cox Cable Hampton Rds., VA DA 94-1288 United Cable TV of East San Fernando Ocala, FL DA 95-661 Los Angeles, CA DA 94-1286 Roanoke, VA DA 95-678 University City, FL DA 95- 696 ORDER Harron Communications Rockland, MA DA 95-558 Adopted: June 5,1995; Released: June 15,1995 Harrison, MI et al. DA 95-546 By the Chief, Cable Services Bureau: Marcy, NY et a/. DA 95-476 New Hartford, NY DA 95-562 1. Each of the parties noted above ("Operator" or, to E. Whiteland, PA DA 95-528 gether, "Operators") has filed with this Bureau a motion, petition, or request for stay of the Bureau©s action in Kansas City Cable Partners ordering refunds, modification of FCC Form 1200, and d/b/a American Cablevision reduction in current rates, pursuant to a finding by the Kansas City, MO DA 95-284 Bureau that the Operator was charging a price for cable services programming (CPS) that was in excess of its maxi mum permitted rate, for the review period of September 1, King Cable 1993 to May 14, 1994. Attachment A shows each party, the Ellensburg, WA DA 95-341 citation to the relevant Bureau order, and the actual and maximum permitted rates for each during the period in TCI Cablevision of Greater Michigan, Inc. question. Vergennes, MI DA 94-1632 2. On two recent occasions, under similar circumstances, Muskegon, MI, et al. DA 95-271 this Bureau has granted an emergency request for stay of Mackinaw, MI, et al. DA 95-316 action.1 In each case, there was no opposition to the re quest. In each, we found that the Operator could suffer Fremont, MI, et al. DA 95-318 irreparable harm if it were required to comply with the Petoskey, MI, et al. DA 95-814 requirements of the Bureau©s refund order during the pen South Haven, MI, et al. DA 95-856 dency of its petition for reconsideration or application for review, since it appears that expenditures made in such TCI Cablevision of West Michigan, Inc. compliance could be unrecoverable. We also noted that Wyoming, MI, et al. DA 95-819 any refunds and adjustments would be due from the release 1 Newhouse Broadcasting Corp., Order, DA 95-621 (Cab. Serv. Bur., released March 28, 1995); Paragon Cable Manhattan, Or der, DA 95-816 (Cab. Serv. Bur., released April 12, 1995). 6567 DA 95-1235 Federal Communications Commission Record 10 FCC Red No. 13 date of the refund order, regardless of any stay of effective Cablevision DA 95-487 4/14/95 City of ness, and would include interest amounts, so that no party IV Cable Cleveland would be harmed by such a stay. Because the equities Cleveland Heights justify granting a stay of the order©s refund and rate reduc Heights, OH 5/1/95 tion provisions, and there is no harm to subscribers or to Cablevision/ DA 95-484 4/14/95 any other party from such a stay, we found we did not V Cable need to reach the question of the likelihood of the oper Euclid, OH ator©s success on the merits of the issues it raises on reconsideration or application for review. Cablevision/ DA 95-501 4/14/95 3. We find that each of the requests before us is substan V Cable tially similar to the requests from Paragon Manhattan and Willowick, OH Newhouse Broadcasting, which we granted. Although in Comcast DA 94- 1153 12/23/94 two cases here, oppositions to the requests have been filed. Baltimore, MD we find that these oppositions are not persuasive. 2 We accordingly grant the above-noted requests for stay of ac Comcast DA 94- 1480 1/31/95 tion pending resolution of Operators© petitions for reconsi TaUahassee, FL deration or application for review. Cox Cable DA 94- 1288 1/17/95 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections Hampton Rds., 0.321 and 1.43 of the Commission©s rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ VA 0.321, 1.43, that the requests for stay of action pending resolution of petitions for reconsideration or applications Cox Cable DA 95-661 5/15/95 for review filed by ARE GRANTED. Ocala, FL FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Cox Cable DA 95-678 5/15/95 Roanoke, VA Cox Cable DA 95-696 5/15/95 University City, FL Meredith J. Jones Harron DA 95-558 4/24/95 Chief, Cable Services Bureau Communicatio ns Rockland. MA Attachment A - Harron DA 95-546 4/24/95 Richmond, Request for Refund Order date filed opposition Communi Memphis, Stay Filed by filed by cations Casco Twp. Harrison, 5/1/95 Bresnan DA 95-534 4/19/95 Ml et al. Communicatio- ns3 Harron DA 95-476 4/18/95 Sault Ste. Communicatio Marie, MI ns " Marcy, NY Cablevision/ DA 95-485 4/14/95 et al. V Cable4 Bedford Harron DA 95-562 4/24/95 Heights, OH Communicatio ns Cablevision/ DA 95-486 4/14/95 New Hartford, V Cable NY Brook Park, OH et al. Harron DA 95-528 4/19/95 Communicatio ns E. Whiteland, PA 2 The City of Cleveland Heights opposes Cablevision©s stay was closed on April 21, and filings due that day were accepted request in that community, arguing on the merits that the on April 24. As noted above, the Cities© other arguments are not Bureau©s order is correct. The Cities of Richmond and Mem determinative here. phis and Casco Township ("the Cities") oppose Harron©s Michi 3 Bresnan has filed its modified FCC Form 1200, with no rate gan request for stay, arguing that it was filed more than 30 days change, and requests a stay of our requirement that it develop after the release date of the Bureau©s order, and that Harron has and file a refund plan. failed to show that it is likely to prevail on the merits or that 4 Bedford Heights has two CUID areas, and two relevant the economic harm of paying refunds would be irreparable. We periods of time. Each of the Cablevision/V Cable orders is note that Harron©s pleading was timely filed, as the Commission similarly structured. 6568 to FCC Red NO. 13 Federal Communications Commission Record DA 95-1235 Kansas City DA 95-284 3/27/95 Cable Partners American Cablevision Kansas City, MO King Cable DA 95-341 3/24/95 Ellensburg, WA Time Warner DA 95-290 3/27/95 Champaign- Urbana, IL Time Warner DA 95-429 4/6/95 Queens, NY Times Mirror DA 94-1335 12/29/94 Orange County, CA TCI Cablevision of Greater Michigan, Inc. Vergennes, MI DA 94-1632 5/24/95 Muskegon, DA 95-271 5/24/95 MI, et al. Mackinaw, DA 95-316 5/24/95 MI. et al. Fremont, DA 95-318 5/24/95 MI, et al. Petoskey, DA 95-814 5/24/95 MI, et al. South Haven, DA 95-856 5/24/95 MI, et al. TCI Cablevision of West Michigan, Inc. Wyoming, DA 95-819 5/24/95 MI, et al. TCI Cablevision of San Jose, CA Redwood City, DA 95-656 5/24/95 CA, et al. TCI Cablevision of Northwestern Ohio, Inc. Archbold, DA 95-657 5/24/95 OH, et al. TCI Cablevision of Merced County Merced, CA DA 95-715 5/24/95 TCI of Central Florida Altamonte DA 95-815 5/24/95 Sp, FL, et al. TCI of South Dade Kendall, FL DA 95-818 5/24/95 TCI Cablevision of California, Inc. Redlands, DA 95-828 5/24/95 CA, et al. United Cable TV of East San Fernando Los DA 94-1286 5/24/95 Angeles, CA 6569.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • USCA Case #97-1524 Document #394723 Filed: 11/06/1998 Page 1 of 10
    <<The pagination in this PDF may not match the actual pagination in the printed slip opinion>> USCA Case #97-1524 Document #394723 Filed: 11/06/1998 Page 1 of 10 United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 4, 1998 Decided November 6, 1998 No. 97-1524 Time Warner Cable, Petitioner v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board Jon W. Tryon argued the cause for the petitioner. Leslie Randolph, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for the respondent. Linda Sher, Associate General Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel at the time the brief was filed, and Peter Winkler, Attorney, were on brief. John D. Burgoyne, <<The pagination in this PDF may not match the actual pagination in the printed slip opinion>> USCA Case #97-1524 Document #394723 Filed: 11/06/1998 Page 2 of 10 Acting Deputy Associate General Counsel, entered an appear- ance. Before: Williams, Henderson and Garland, Circuit Judges. Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge Henderson. Karen LeCraft Henderson, Circuit Judge: Time Warner Cable, Inc. (Time Warner) petitions for review of an order of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or Board) con- cluding that it engaged in an unfair labor practice by refusing to bargain with the Communication Workers of America, Local 1120 (Union). Time Warner Cable, 324 N.L.R.B. No. 25 (Aug. 5, 1997). The NLRB cross-applies for enforcement of its order. Time Warner admitted that it refused to bargain but challenged the validity of the Union's certification based on the NLRB's disqualification of a challenged, and potentially determinative, ballot.
    [Show full text]
  • 10/3/00 Vacation-Drainage & Utility Easements
    1013100 VACATION - DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENTS - BRENDAN GLENN I City Of Edina, Minnesota DEPARMNT OF AD~TRA'ITON 4801 West 50fhStreet, Edina, Minnesota 554241394 Phone (612) 927-8861 TDD (612)826-0379 Fax (612) 826-0390 Proposed Property,/Area To Be Vacated Brendan Glenn City Engineer by Acceptable Opposed RConditional U Minnegasco by 0Acceptable Opposed c] Conditional NSP by Acceptable 0Opposed c].Conditional Paragon Cable by 0Acceptable Opposed 0Conditional U.S.West by Acceptable Opposed Conditional Location: Please sign and return indicating receipt of notice. Thank you for your cooperation. Return to: City Clerk City of Edina 4801 W. 50" Street Edina, MN 55424 Telephone: 826-0408 Fa: 826-0390 t REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # 1I.A. From: Francis J. Hoffman Consent City Engineer &d Information Only [7 Date: October 3,2000 Mgr. Recommends [7 To HRA To Council Subject: Vacation of Existing Action Motion Easement over a portion of Resolution the NW %of S6 TI16 R21 Ordinance c] Discussion Recommendation: Vacate existing easement in Document No. 3490171 over a portion of the northwest quarter of Section 6, Township 116, Range 21 with the condition that the existing easement be replaced on the new Brendan Glenn Plat. Info/Backg round: The proposed vacation of the existing easement is requested by the developer of the Brendan Glenn Plat. The new plat will have a new drainage and utility easement which will replace the existing easement. Staff recommends the vacation be approved. NSP (Xcel Energy), US West (Qwest), Time Warner and Minnegasco (Reliant Energy) have all approved the request.
    [Show full text]
  • S: 181 Ent Age Bandwidth Gave Cable Operators the Pole Position
    UNICATIONS ENGINEERING & DESIGN GAZINE OF BROADBAND COMMUNICATIONS s: 181 ent age Bandwidth Gave Cable Operators the Pole Position. teenuge ip leg Aire' An*L But in The Race For Cyberspace Only Motorola Can Put You in The Winner's Circle. Take The Checkered Flt The race for cyber space has reached the final lap and the stands are filled with subscribers anxiously waiting at the finish line. They won't notice who finishes second, so it's essential that you choose a vehicle that is second to none, Motorola's CyberSURFRTM cable modem. An exciting product of Motorola's CableComm technologies, the CyberSURFR modem drives data downstream at remarkably high speeds. Turning to the upstream path, it successfully outmaneuvers the inherent 114111Mit. noise ingress in HFC networks, accelerating information through at 768 kilobits per second. Thus connecting personal computers to a transmission system that delivers lightning fast multimedia communica- CyberSURFR' Cable Modem tions to your speed-hungry subscribers. And as these new speeds enable the next generation of applications and content, the protocol adapts to meet the needs. But speed alone is not enough. Unique technologies that economize precious cable spectrum, use of proven frequency agility techniques, forward error correction, and dynamic load balancing, provide your subscribers with ample bandwidth on demand. While standards based encryption protects their sensitive information. Innovation, reliability, quality and attention to detail will allow the winners to pull away from the rest of the pack. And since these characteristics are the hallmark of all Motorola products, no one else is more capable of helping you lap the competition.
    [Show full text]
  • The Book of Broken Promises:$400 Billion Broadband Scandal
    THE BOOK OF BROKEN PROMISES: $400 BILLION BROADBAND SCANDAL & FREE THE NET FOR ERIC LEE, AUNT ETHEL, ARNKUSH, AND THE TEAM Author: Bruce Kushnick, Executive Director New Networks Institute February, 2015 Cover Art: Ferrari Wall Paper1, Broken Skateboard by Pr0totyp2 Disclaimer: AT&T, Verizon and CenturyLink are the progeny of the original AT&T. The AT&T logo is the property of AT&T Inc. and the use has not been authorized, sponsored by, or endorsed by the trademark owner. The Verizon logo is the property of Verizon Communications, Inc, and the use has not been authorized, sponsored by, or endorsed by the trademark owner. The CenturyLink logo is the property of CenturyLink, and the use has not been authorized, sponsored by, or endorsed by the trademark owner. All rights reserved. This book has been prepared by New Networks Institute. All rights reserved. Reproduction or further distribution of this report without written authorization is prohibited by law. For additional copies or information please contact [email protected]. © 1997, 2004, 2015 New Networks Institute The Book of Broken Promises 1 What others have said about Bruce Kushnick’s research and previous books: 3 David Cay Johnston, Recipient of the Pulitzer Prize, Author of The Fine Print, 2012 “Kushnick’s estimate comes from his meticulous analysis of disclosure document filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and other regulatory agencies… Kushnick’s estimate might significantly understate how much extra money people paid for an electronic highway they did not get. It seems very likely that Kushnick’s numbers are uncomfortably close to the truth.” Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Geographical Index to Cable Systems in the US & Canada
    Geographical Index to Cable Systems in the U.S. & Canada Middletown Fayetteville Springfield Cablevision Industries - Orange County Division Cablevision of Fayetteville Continental Cablevision of Ohio Inc. (Cablevision Industries Inc.) (Time Warner Cable Group /ATC) (Continental Cablevision Inc.) New York Greensboro Warren Manhattan Cable TV Inc. Cablevision of Greensboro TCI Cablevision of Ohio Inc. (Time Warner /New York City Cable Group) (Time Warner Cable Group /ATC) (Tele- Communications Inc.) Paragon Communications CV! Youngstown (Time Warner /New York City Cable Group) (Cablevision Industries Inc.) Warner Cable Communications Inc: Youngstown Niagara Falls Hickory (Warner Cable Communications Inc.) Adelphia Cable- Niagara Catawba Valley Cable TV (Adelphia Communications) (Prime Cable) OKLAHOMA Oneida Raleigh Oklahoma City Cablevision Industries - Oneida /Seneca Division Cablevision of Raleigh Cox Cable Oklahoma City Inc. (Cablevision Industries Inc.) (Time Warner Cable Group/ATC) (Cox Cable Communications) Ossining OHIO Tulsa Continental Cablevision of New York Akron United Artists Cable of Oklahoma (Continental Cablevision Inc.) (United Artists Entertainment) Inc. Port Jefferson Station Warner Cable Communications (Warner Cable Communications Inc.) OREGON Brookhaven Cable TV Inc. Canton (United Artists Entertainment) Corvallis Warner Cable of Canton Riverhead TCI Cablevision of Oregon (Warner Cable Communications Inc.) (Tele- Communications Inc.) Cablevision's East End System Cincinnati (Cablevision Systems Corporation) Eugene Warner Cable Communications Inc. TCI Cablevision of Oregon Inc. Rochester (Warner Cable Communications Inc.) (Tele- Communications Inc.) Greater Rochester Cablevision Inc. Cleveland Hgts. (Time Warner Cable Group /ATC) Medford Cablevision Saratoga Springs (Cablevision Systems Corporation) TCI Cablevision of Oregon Inc. (Tele- Communications Inc.) Saratoga Cablevision Systems Corp. Cablevision Portland (Cablevision Industries Inc.) (Cablevision Systems Corporation) Schenectady Columbus Paragon Cable (KBLCOM) TCI of New York Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Action Pending Index
    NYS Register/November 10, 2004 Action Pending Index ACTION PENDING INDEX The action pending index is a list of all proposed rules For additional information concerning any of the which are currently being considered for adoption. A proposals listed in the action pending index, use the proposed rule is added to the index when the notice of identification number to locate the text of the original proposed rule making is first published in the Register.A notice of proposed rule making. The identification proposed rule is removed from the index when any of the number contains a code which identifies the agency, the following occur : (1) the proposal is adopted as a issue of the Register in which the notice was printed, the permanent rule; (2) the proposal is rejected and year in which the notice was printed and the notice’s withdrawn from consideration; or (3) the proposal’s notice serial number. The following diagram shows how to expires. read identification number codes. Most notices expire in approximately six months if the agency does not adopt or reject the proposal within that Agency Issue Year Serial Action code number published number Code time. The expiration date is printed in the second column of the action pending index. Some notices, AAM 01 96 00001 P however, never expire. Those notices are identified by the word “exempt” in the second column. If an agency Action codes: P - proposed rule making; EP - emergency submits a notice of continuation, the letter “c” follows the and proposed rule making (expiration date refers to new expiration date.
    [Show full text]
  • Action Pending Index
    NYS Register/August 06, 2003 Action Pending Index ACTION PENDING INDEX The action pending index is a list of all proposed rules For additional information concerning any of the which are currently being considered for adoption. A proposals listed in the action pending index, use the proposed rule is added to the index when the notice of identification number to locate the text of the original proposed rule making is first published in the Register.A notice of proposed rule making. The identification proposed rule is removed from the index when any of the number contains a code which identifies the agency, the following occur : (1) the proposal is adopted as a issue of the Register in which the notice was printed, the permanent rule; (2) the proposal is rejected and year in which the notice was printed and the notice’s withdrawn from consideration; or (3) the proposal’s notice serial number. The following diagram shows how to expires. read identification number codes. Most notices expire in approximately six months if the agency does not adopt or reject the proposal within that Agency Issue Year Serial Action code number published number Code time. The expiration date is printed in the second column of the action pending index. Some notices, AAM 01 96 00001 P however, never expire. Those notices are identified by the word “exempt” in the second column. If an agency Action codes: P - proposed rule making; EP - emergency submits a notice of continuation, the letter “c” follows the and proposed rule making (expiration date refers to new expiration date.
    [Show full text]
  • Record of Prior Testimony
    RECORD OF EXPERT TESTIMONY ECONOMICS AND TECHNOLOGY, INC. 2010 California Public Utilities Commission, O1 Communications, Inc. (U 6065 C) v. Verizon California., a California Corporation (U 1002 C), C.08-02-013 and Verizon California., a California Corporation (U 1002 C) v. O1 Communications, Inc. (U 6065 C) C. 09-06-025, on behalf of O1 Communications, Inc., Reply Testimony filed February 3, 2010. Witness: Lee L. Selwyn 2009 Illinois Commerce Commission, Frontier Communications Corporation, Verizon Communications, Inc., et al, Joint Application for Approval of a Reorganization, Docket No. 09-0268, on behalf of the People of the State of Illinois, Citizens Utility Board, Direct Testimony filed October 20, 2009, Rebuttal Testimony filed December 14, 2009. Witness: Lee L. Selwyn Superior Court of California, County of Alameda, James Thomas, on behalf of themselves, the general public, and all those similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Global Vision Products, Inc., Antony Imbriolo, Derrike Cope, David L. Gordon, Powertel Technologies, Inc., Craig Dix, Henry Edelson and Robert Debenedictis, Defendants, Case No. RG03-091195, on behalf of the Law Offices of Scott A. Bursor, Oral testimony and cross examination on November 9, 2009. Witness: Colin B. Weir United States District Court, District of New Jersey, Judy Larson, Barry Hall, Joe Milliron, Tessie Robb, and Willie Davis, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. AT&T Mobility LLC f/k/a Cingular Wireless LLC and Sprint Nextel Corporation and Sprint Spectrum L.P. d/b/a Sprint Nextel and Nextel Finance Company, Civ. Act. No. 07-5325 (JLL), on behalf of PinilisHalpern, LLP and Law Offices of Scott A.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Communications Commission Record 9 FCC Red No
    DA 94-1072 Federal Communications Commission Record 9 FCC Red No. 21 shall provide that if Paragon is unable to fulfill its refund Before the obligations for any reason, then the surety will fulfill that Federal Communications Commission obligation to the City, on behalf of Paragon©s subscribers.4 Washington, D.C. 20554 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the local rate order adopted by the City of Grapevine, Texas is STAYED pending the resolution of Paragon Cable©s Appeal. This In the Matter of action is taken by the Chief. Cable Services Bureau, pursu ant to authority delegated by Section 0.321 of the Commis PARAGON CABLE sion©s rules. 47 C.F.R. § 0.321. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the amount of the Petition for a Stay refunds required by the City of Grapevine©s local rate order of a Local Rate Order of the SHALL BE PLACED by Paragon Cable in an interest- bearing escrow account, OR SHALL BE SECURED by the City of Grapevine, TX posting of a bond for the benefit of the City for the amount of money the City has ordered Paragon to refund, plus interest. The amount of the bond shall be the total amount ORDER of money subject to the refund order, plus interest on that amount for a twelve (12) month period from the date of Adopted: September 30, 1994; Released: September 30, 1994 this Order. Proof of Paragon©s compliance with this Order shall be filed with the Commission within thirty (30) days By the Chief, Cable Services Bureau: of the release of this Order.
    [Show full text]
  • DA-07-486A1.Pdf
    Federal Communications Commission DA 07-486 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the matter of ) ) Fiber Technologies Networks, L.L.C., ) ) Complainant, ) ) File No. EB-05-MD-014 v. ) ) ) North Pittsburgh Telephone Company, ) ) Respondent. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: February 23, 2007 Released: February 23, 2007 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Memorandum Opinion and Order, we grant a Complaint1 filed by Fiber Technologies Networks, L.L.C. (“Fibertech”) against North Pittsburgh Telephone Company (“NPTC”), pursuant to section 224 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (“the Act”)2 and sections 1.1401-1.1418 of the Commission’s rules.3 The Complaint alleges that NPTC violated section 224 by denying Fibertech access to NPTC’s poles for the placement of Fibertech’s attachments.4 Fibertech requests that the Commission grant it immediate access to NPTC’s poles, and require NPTC to take all actions necessary to accommodate Fibertech’s access.5 For the reasons stated below, we grant Fibertech’s Complaint and order NPTC to provide Fibertech immediately with nondiscriminatory access to NPTC’s poles. II. FACTUAL AND REGULATORY BACKGROUND 2. Fibertech provides facilities-based fiber-optic telecommunications capacity and services.6 Fibertech holds four Certificates of Public Convenience (“Certificates”) from the Pennsylvania Public 1 Complaint of Fiber Technologies Networks, LLC, File No. EB-05-MD-014 (filed Jul. 8, 2005) (“Complaint”). 2 47 U.S.C. § 224. 3 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1401-1.1418. 4 See, e.g., Complaint at 5, ¶ 19 and 7, ¶ 29. 5 Complaint at 8-9, ¶ 34.
    [Show full text]
  • S:\CA\2015\TWC-Charter\LLS Report\FINAL\Selwyn Reply Testimony A-15-07-009 REDACTED 1-15-16Y.Wpd
    Before the CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION In the matter of Joint Application of Charter Communi- cations, Inc.; Charter Fiberlink CACCO, LLC (U6878C); Time Warner Cable Inc.; Time Warner Cable Information Services (California), LLC (U6874C); Advance/ Newhouse Partnership; Bright House Networks, LLC; and Bright House Networks Information Services (California), LLC (U6955C) Pursuant to California Public Application 15-07-009 Utilities Code Section 854 for Expedited Approval of the Transfer of Control of both Time Warner Cable Information Services (California), LLC (U6874C) and Bright House Networks Information Services (California), LLC (U6955C) to Charter Communications, Inc., and for Expedited Approval of a pro forma transfer of control of Charter Fiberlink CA-CCO, LLC (U6878C). Reply Testimony of LEE L. SELWYN on behalf of the Office of Ratepayer Advocates of the California Public Utilities Commission January 15, 2016 REDACTED FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION REPLY TESTIMONY OF LEE L. SELWYN TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY vii I. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY 1 Qualifications, background and experience 1 Assignment 4 Summary and Recommendation 5 II. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE TRANSACTION AND SHAREHOLDER AND CUSTOMER IMPACTS 12 The Transaction 12 The incurrence of additional debt to finance the transaction will result in a more highly leveraged post-merger entity. 13 The increased debt service payment obligations to which New Charter will be subject may actually exceed the net increase in annual Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA) that the Joint Applicants attribute to the transaction. 19 One component of the increase in EBITDA that the Joint Applicants anticipate may be the result of post-merger price increases for services that confront little or no effective competition.
    [Show full text]
  • S.No. Accode Appl.No. Name Sector Address Mobile No. Maintenanc E
    Detailed List of Non Paid Units of MAINTENANCE Charges as on 30th November 2015 Maintenanc S.No. Accode Appl.No. Name Sector Address Mobile No. e Bal. 1 38819 23543 SHARMA AUTO PRODUCTS 1 1A2 9312835122 56265 2 38820 1653 ANKUR PLASTIC 1 1A3 9818412160 58610 3 38821 5804 S K COSMETICS 1 1A4 58610 4 38822 6925 BYFORCE CABLE INDUSTRIES 1 1A5 9873225232 58610 5 38823 17943 JAI BHAWANI INDUSTRIES 1 1A6 9871955755 21382 6 38824 4271 S R OFFSET PRESS 1 1A7 9818380011 58610 7 38825 6451 KUNDANCAB PVT LTD 1 1A8 9987022284 10304 8 38826 2068 INDIA OVERSEAS CORPORATION 1 1A9 9811090878 21898 9 38827 5514 R K Services 1 1A10 9312227934 4040 10 38828 4946 SOAMI ARTS & CRAFTS 1 1A11 9312664028 0 11 38829 42313 SUPREME INDUSTRIES 1 1A12 9811256883 46887 12 38830 21345 KUNAL ENTERPRIESES 1 1A13 9310244959 40 13 38831 1946 SHIVA PRINT O PACKS 1 1A14 9310049335 0 14 38832 279 SAT KARTA ELECTRIC WORKS 1 1A15 9810036497 46887 15 38833 13502 PRUTHI INDUSTRIES 1 1A16 8607578017 46887 16 38834 19626 TICA PRODUCTS 1 1A17 9650250021 46887 17 38835 2904 SRI ADHISHWAR INDUSTRIES 1 1A18 46887 18 38836 28250 DEEPAK ELECTRIC & ENGG 1 1A19 9810040795 6121 19 38837 12197 GULSHAN TIMBER STORE 1 1A20 46887 20 38838 39089 NARULA INDUSTRIES 1 1A21 8750000471 21898 21 38839 23205 SKYLARK ENGG WORKS 1 1A23 9818021822 40023 22 38840 22149 KANIKA TRADING CO 1 1A24 9818291626 4040 23 38841 42461 NEW INDIA CASTING CO 1 1A25 9868045790 12616 24 38842 2251 S G M ENTERPRISES 1 1A26 9871561666 0 25 38843 27362 PREMIER METALS 1 1A27 46887 26 38844 14193 P K INDUSTRIES 1 1A28 9312874880
    [Show full text]