DOCSLIB.ORG

California Clapper Rail ( Rallus Longirostris Obsoletus ) Population Monitoring: 2005-2011 Final Technical Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
California Clapper Rail ( Rallus Longirostris Obsoletus ) Population Monitoring: 2005-2011 Final Technical Report California Clapper Rail ( Rallus longirostris obsoletus ) Population monitoring: 2005-2011 Final Technical Report Leonard Liu, Julian Wood, Nadav Nur, Leo Salas, and Dennis Jongsomjit PRBO Conservation Science 3820 Cypress Drive #11, Petaluma, CA 94954 California Clapper Rail Population Monitoring 2005-2011 Final Report Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.......................................................................................3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.......................................................................................4 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................6 METHODS ..............................................................................................................9 FIELD SURVEYS .................................................................................................................... 9 ANALYSES ......................................................................................................................... 10 MODEL APPROACH ............................................................................................................. 11 ECOLOGICAL MODEL ........................................................................................................... 11 Detection Sub-model. ............................................................................................................................. 11 Abundance Sub-model. .......................................................................................................................... 12 SITE MODEL ...................................................................................................................... 13 YEAR MODEL .................................................................................................................... 13 LANDSCAPE MODEL ............................................................................................................ 14 POPULATION ESTIMATES ...................................................................................................... 14 RESULTS...............................................................................................................15 ECOLOGICAL MODEL ........................................................................................................... 15 Detection sub-model. ............................................................................................................................. 15 Abundance Sub-model. .......................................................................................................................... 16 SITE MODEL ..................................................................................................................... 17 ANNUAL VARIATION IN DENSITY ........................................................................................... 18 LANDSCAPE MODEL ............................................................................................................ 18 POPULATION ESTIMATES ...................................................................................................... 19 DISCUSSION........................................................................................................19 DETECTION PROBABILITY ...................................................................................................... 19 HABITAT SUITABILITY .......................................................................................................... 20 POPULATION SIZE OF CALIFORNIA CLAPPER RAIL AND ITS IMPLICATIONS ......................................... 21 CHANGE IN POPULATION SIZE , RECENT TRENDS , AND SHIFTS IN DISTRIBUTION ............................... 21 HISTORICAL ABUNDANCE AND DISTRIBUTION , COMPARISON WITH THE PRESENT ............................ 22 EVALUATION OF THE LANDSCAPE MODEL ................................................................................ 23 RECOMMENDATIONS.......................................................................................24 CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................ 24 MONITORING RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................................... 26 NEXT STEPS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE STUDIES ..................................................... 27 Pilot protocol ......................................................................................................................................... 27 Clapper Rail life history and demography ................................................................................................ 28 LITERATURE CITED...........................................................................................29 TABLES………………………………………………………………………………..34 FIGURES……………………………………………..………………………………..54 APPENDIX……………………………………………………………………...…….79 2 California Clapper Rail Population Monitoring 2005-2011 Final Report Suggested citation Liu, L., J. Wood, N. Nur, L. Salas, and D. Jongsomjit. 2012. California Clapper Rail ( Rallus longirostris obsoletus ) Population monitoring: 2005-2011. PRBO Technical Report to the California Department of Fish and Game. Acknowledgments PRBO data collected under TE-807078-10 and -12 from USFWS and a Memorandum of Understanding between California Dept. of Fish and Game and PRBO (3/14/2003-3/14/2005; 4/23/2010). This project was made possible with additional funding from the Grand Foundation and the California State Coastal Conservancy’s Invasive Spartina Project. In addition to our collaborators (Avocet Research Associates, California Department of Fish and Game, California Coastal Conservancy’s Invasive Spartina Project, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, East Bay Regional Park District, and H.T. Harvey and Associates), PRBO benefited greatly from the assistance of a number of other individuals, organizations and agencies who helped with site access: California Department of Transportation, City of Palo Alto, City of Petaluma, City of Redwood City, Marin Audubon Society, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Ryan Phelan, Port of Sonoma, San Mateo Department of Transportation, Shell Oil Company, and Vallejo Sanitation and Flood Control District. We would also like to thank Elizabeth Brusati, Craig Cummings, Loring Dales, Anna Doty, Natasha Dvorak, Joe Eaton, Megan Elrod, Sarah Estrella, Dea Freid, Jeanne Hammond, Terra Hendrich, Mark Herzog, Ingrid Hogle, Beth Huning, Rick Johnson, Robin Leong, Molly McNamara, Eric Pilotte, Orien Richmond, John Robeson, Christina Sloop, Bill Stagnaro, Ron Sullivan, Karen Taylor, Laura Valoppi, Erika Walther, Amber Wingert, and Jason Yakich who contributed their time to assist with this effort. This is PRBO contribution number 12220. 3 California Clapper Rail Population Monitoring 2005-2011 Final Report Executive Summary In 2005, PRBO Conservation Science led a multi-partner effort to develop standardized survey protocols and determine population size and trends for the endangered California Clapper Rail in the San Francisco Bay Estuary. Partners contributing to the standardized protocol dataset included the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, California Department of Fish and Game, California Coastal Conservancy’s San Francisco Estuary Invasive Spartina Project, Avocet Research Associates, and East Bay Regional Park District. Data were collected from 212 marsh sites throughout the San Francisco Bay Estuary from 2005 through 2011 using standardized point count protocols to assess abundance and distribution and the relationship to habitat and landscape features. Data were analyzed using imperfect detection models or “zero-inflated models” that assume that some visits with no detections are in fact false zeroes meaning an individual was present but not detected. Failure to account for excess zeroes in the dataset can result in underestimates of true abundance. By correcting for imperfect detection, the statistical models can overcome an important bias affecting estimates of rail abundance. The California Clapper Rail population was relatively stable in 2005-2007, declined significantly in 2008 (51%), which was followed by low but relatively stable densities in 2009-2011. The decline in the South Bay (south of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge) was steeper and densities lower than in the North Bay during the period 2008- 2011. The California Clapper Rail range-wide population size was estimated at 1,167 individuals (range 954 to 1426) during 2009–2011. This estimate was developed by combining the site-specific densities from surveyed sites with predicted densities from unsurveyed areas using a statistical model that incorporated 15 key physical predictor variables that characterized marsh habitat and landscape condition in relation to Clapper Rail density. By accounting for fine-scale variation in habitat conditions relevant to Clapper Rails, this method represents a significant improvement over previous population estimates that simply applied average densities to total marsh area. Marsh complexes with the highest densities identified by our models were found along the western shores of San Pablo Bay from China Camp to Petaluma River and Corte Madera area. Marsh complexes in the South Bay with relatively high densities included East Palo Alto-Guadalupe Slough and Bair-Greco-Ravenswood. Time of season and time of day were the most important factors affecting Clapper Rail probability of detection. The effect of Julian day on probability of detection
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Introduction
    INTRODUCTION UC-Stallcup TEXT.indd 1 1/23/14 11:30 AM This contribution to the California Natural History Guide Series of the University of California Press follows a long tradi- tion of books that explain, explore, and celebrate the natural riches of California and beyond. Our intent is to tell beginning birders, or curious naturalists, the how, what, when, where, and why of birding. Because birds are so mobile, some individuals of most spe- cies can wander far from their natal homes and appear any- where. Here we have tried to include only those species most likely to be seen along the coast, from Big Sur to the Oregon border. This is not a field guide to bird identification, but a field guide to the birds themselves. Birding is a word that encompasses many concepts. For some, the activity of searching for and observing birds is a clear window into the natural world, an affirmation of its beauty and its peacefulness. To others, birding is a delightful diversion from the hectic or perhaps boring daily routine of the mod- ern world— providing calm amid the chaos. Birds are nature’s ambassadors, connecting us through their ancient lineage to evolution’s astonishing creativity and offering us some guid- ance, through our study of their habitat needs, in our steward- ship of the Earth. Some people have found the wonders of birds to be the perfect antidote to sadness or loneliness, or a path to comradeship with kindred spirits; others consider the complex- ities of identification or behavior an intellectual challenge.
    [Show full text]
  • Clapper Rail (Rallus Longirostris) Studies in Alabama Dan C
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Aquila Digital Community Northeast Gulf Science Volume 2 Article 2 Number 1 Number 1 6-1978 Clapper Rail (Rallus longirostris) Studies in Alabama Dan C. Holliman Birmingham-Southern College DOI: 10.18785/negs.0201.02 Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/goms Recommended Citation Holliman, D. C. 1978. Clapper Rail (Rallus longirostris) Studies in Alabama. Northeast Gulf Science 2 (1). Retrieved from https://aquila.usm.edu/goms/vol2/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Gulf of Mexico Science by an authorized editor of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Holliman: Clapper Rail (Rallus longirostris) Studies in Alabama Northeast Gulf Science Vol. 2, No.1, p. 24-34 June 1978 CLAPPER RAIL (Rallus longirostris) STUDIES IN ALABAMAl Dan C. Holliman Biology Department Birmingham-Southern College Birmingham, AL 35204 ABSTRACT: The habitat and distribution of the clapper rail Rallus longirostris saturatus in salt and brackish-mixed marshes of Alabama is described. A total of 4,490 hectares of habitat is mapped. Smaller units of vti'getation are characterized in selected study areas. A comparison of these plant communities and call, count data is shown for each locality. Concentrations of clapper rails generally occurrecj in those habitats with the higher percentage of Spartina alterniflora. A census techni­ que utilizing taped calls is described. Trapping procedures are given for drift fences and funnel traps.
    [Show full text]
  • A Classification of the Rallidae
    A CLASSIFICATION OF THE RALLIDAE STARRY L. OLSON HE family Rallidae, containing over 150 living or recently extinct species T and having one of the widest distributions of any family of terrestrial vertebrates, has, in proportion to its size and interest, received less study than perhaps any other major group of birds. The only two attempts at a classifi- cation of all of the recent rallid genera are those of Sharpe (1894) and Peters (1934). Although each of these lists has some merit, neither is satisfactory in reflecting relationships between the genera and both often separate closely related groups. In the past, no attempt has been made to identify the more primitive members of the Rallidae or to illuminate evolutionary trends in the family. Lists almost invariably begin with the genus Rdus which is actually one of the most specialized genera of the family and does not represent an ancestral or primitive stock. One of the difficulties of rallid taxonomy arises from the relative homo- geneity of the family, rails for the most part being rather generalized birds with few groups having morphological modifications that clearly define them. As a consequence, particularly well-marked genera have been elevated to subfamily rank on the basis of characters that in more diverse families would not be considered as significant. Another weakness of former classifications of the family arose from what Mayr (194933) referred to as the “instability of the morphology of rails.” This “instability of morphology,” while seeming to belie what I have just said about homogeneity, refers only to the characteristics associated with flightlessness-a condition that appears with great regularity in island rails and which has evolved many times.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution and Abundance
    DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE IN RELATION TO HABITAT AND LANDSCAPE FEATURES AND NEST SITE CHARACTERISTICS OF CALIFORNIA BLACK RAIL (Laterallus jamaicensis coturniculus) IN THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY ESTUARY FINAL REPORT To the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service March 2002 Hildie Spautz* and Nadav Nur, PhD Point Reyes Bird Observatory 4990 Shoreline Highway Stinson Beach, CA 94970 *corresponding author contact: [email protected] PRBO Black Rail Report to FWS 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY We conducted surveys for California Black Rails (Laterallus jamaicensis coturniculus) at 34 tidal salt marshes in San Pablo Bay, Suisun Bay, northern San Francisco Bay and western Marin County in 2000 and 2001 with the aims of: 1) providing the best current information on distribution and abundance of Black Rails, marsh by marsh, and total population size per bay region, 2) identifying vegetation, habitat, and landscape features that predict the presence of black rails, and 3) summarizing information on nesting and nest site characteristics. Abundance indices were higher at 8 marshes than in 1996 and earlier surveys, and lower in 4 others; with two showing no overall change. Of 13 marshes surveyed for the first time, Black Rails were detected at 7 sites. The absolute density calculated using the program DISTANCE averaged 2.63 (± 1.05 [S.E.]) birds/ha in San Pablo Bay and 3.44 birds/ha (± 0.73) in Suisun Bay. At each survey point we collected information on vegetation cover and structure, and calculated landscape metrics using ArcView GIS. We analyzed Black Rail presence or absence by first analyzing differences among marshes, and then by analyzing factors that influence detection of rails at each survey station.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010-2011 California Regulations for Waterfowl and Upland Game Hunting, Public Lands
    Table of Contents CALIFORNIA General Information Contacting DFG ....................................... 2 10-11 Licenses, Stamps, & Permits................... 3 Waterfowl & Upland Shoot Time Tables ................................... 4 Game Hunting and Unlawful Activities .......................... 6 Hunting & Other Public Uses on State & Federal Waterfowl Hunting Lands Regulations Summary of Changes for 10-11 ............... 7 Seasons and Limits ................................. 9 Effective July 1, 2010 - June 30, 2011 Waterfowl Consumption Health except as noted. Warnings ............................................. 12 State of California Special Goose Hunt Area Maps ............ 14 Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger Waterfowl Zone Map ....Inside Back Cover Natural Resources Agency Upland Game Bird, Small Game Secretary Lester A. Snow Mammal, and Crow Hunting Regulation Summary ............................. 16 Fish and Game Commission President Jim Kellogg Seasons & Limits Table ......................... 17 Vice President Richard B. Rogers Hunt Zones ............................................ 18 Commissioner Michael Sutton Hunting and Other Public Uses on Commissioner Daniel W. Richards State and Federal Areas Acting Executive Director Jon Fischer Reservation System .............................. 20 General Public Use Activities on Department of Fish and Game Director John McCamman All State Wildlife Areas ....................... 23 Hunting, Firearms, and Archery Alternate communication formats are available upon request. If reasonable
    [Show full text]
  • Light-Footed Ridgway's (Clapper) Rail in California
    Light-footed Ridgway’s (Clapper) Rail in California 2018 Season By Richard Zembal, Susan M. Hoffman, John Konecny, and Beth Sabiston Final Report to US Fish and Wildlife Service and California Department of Fish and Wildlife Light-footed Ridgway’s (Clapper) Rail in California 2018 Season Richard Zembal, Susan M. Hoffman, John Konecny, and Beth Sabiston Clapper Rail Recovery Fund Huntington Beach Wetlands Conservancy 24821 Buckboard Lane Laguna Hills, CA 92653 December 21, 2018 Table of Contents ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................... 2 METHODS ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Population Monitoring .........................................................................................................4 Nest Monitoring ...................................................................................................................5 Breeding in Zoological Facilities .........................................................................................6 Banding and Tracking ..........................................................................................................8 STUDY AREAS ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Light-Footed Clapper Rail Management and Population Assessment, 1993
    State of California The Resource Agency Department of Fish and Game Wildlife Management Division LIGHT-FOOTED CLAPPER RAIL MANAGEMENT AND POPULATION ASSESSMENT, 1993 by Richard Zembal Nongame Bird and Mammal Program Report, 94-6 FINAL REPORT TO California Department of Fish and Game 1416 Ninth Street Sacramento, CA 95814 CONTRACT FG2327 (FY 92/93) Partially Supported by Section 6 Federal Grant-in-Aid Funding for Endangered Species, California, EW92, X-l LIGHT-FOOTED CLAPPER RAIL MANAGEMENT AND POPULATION ASSESSMENT, 1993 CONTRACTOR California State University, Long Beach Foundation Long Beach, California 90840 PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR Dr. Charles T. Collins Department of Biology California State University Long Beach, CA 90840 AUTHOR AND PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR Richard Zembal Research Associate State of California The Resources Agency Department of Fish and Game Wildlife Management Division LIGHT-FOOTED CLAPPER RAIL CENSUS AND STUDY, 1993 by Richard Zembal Research Associate, Biology Department California State University Long Beach, CA 90840 ABSTRACT The fourteenth consecutive annual census of the endangered light-footed clapper rail (Rallus longirostris levipes) was conducted by call counts throughout the bird's range in California, 3 March - 15 April 1993. There were 300 pairs of clapper rails exhibiting breeding behavior in 13 marshes, a 9% increase over 1992. One hundred and forty-two pairs, or 47.3% of the state total, were detected at Upper Newport Bay. The subpopulations in the Tijuana Marsh National Wildlife Refuge (NWR), Seal Beach NWR, and Upper Newport Bay totalled 270 pairs, or 90% of the California population. Most of the subpopulations are small and face serious problems that should be dealt with through increased management and the provision of additional habitat or they will be lost.
    [Show full text]
  • Avian Premaxilla and Tarsometatarsus from The
    762 ShortCommunications andCommentaries [Auk,Vol. 112 The Auk 112(3):762-767, 1995 Avian Premaxilla and Tarsometatarsusfrom the Uppermost Cretaceous of Montana ANDRZEJ ELZANOWSKIa AND MICHAEL K. BRETT-$URMAN2 •Departmentof VertebrateZoology, National Museum of NaturalHistory, SmithsonianInstitution, Washington, D.C. 20560, USA; and 2Departmentof Geology,George Washington University, Washington, D.C. 20052,USA Despitea variety of fragmentary,apparently neog- is rounded and smooth,and the sidesare very steep. nathousavian fossilsknown from the uppermostCre- The largest among the neurovascularforamina scat- taceousdeposits (Brodkorb 1963, Olson 1985, Olson tered on each side are two elongatedorsal foramina: and Parris 1987),we still lack even an approximate the vessel from the rostral one coursed rostrad, whereas idea of how many neognathouslineages survived be- the vesselfrom the caudalone apparentlybifurcated yond the Cretaceous/Tertiaryboundary. Most of the into a smaller rostral and a larger caudal branch. In Maastrichtian avian bones reveal a charadriiform or addition, a number of smaller openingsperforates transitional charadriiform-gruiform morphology, eachside of the symphysis. which may be plesiomorphicfor most (Olson 1985) The ventral surfaceof the premaxillarysymphysis but probably not all of the neognaths(Elzanowski is strongly concave(Fig. lc, d). There are no distinct 1995). Other than that, there is some fossil evidence neurovascularforamina on the ventral (palatal) sur- for the existence of loons in the Cretaceous(Olson face,with the possibleexception of one small opening 1992)and mostly indirect evidencefor the pre-Ter- on the left side. The palatal shelvesof the premaxilla tiary origins of the relict pelecaniforms(Phaethon- begin from the symphysialtip and graduallybroaden tidae and Fregatidae) and procellariiforms (Elza- caudally where each of them occupiesone-third of nowski and Gaiton 1991).
    [Show full text]
  • ON 23(3) 461-466.Pdf
    SHORT COMMUNICATIONS ORNITOLOGIA NEOTROPICAL 23: 461–466, 2012 © The Neotropical Ornithological Society FIRST DESCRIPTION OF THE NEST AND EGGS OF THE PLAIN-FLANKED RAIL (RALLUS WETMOREI) Adriana Rodríguez-Ferraro1,2, Eugenia Sánchez2, & Miguel Lentino3 1Departamento de Estudios Ambientales, Universidad Simón Bolívar, Apdo. 89.000, Caracas 1080-A, Venezuela. E-mail: [email protected] 2Laboratorio de Ecología Molecular de Vertebrados, Universidad Simón Bolívar, Apdo. 89.000, Caracas 1080-A, Venezuela. 3Fundación William H. Phelps, Apdo. 2009, Caracas 1010-A, Venezuela. Primera descripción del nido y los huevos de la Polla de Wetmore (Rallus wetmorei). Key words: Plain-flanked Rail, Rallus wetmorei, eggs, mangrove, nest, Venezuela. INTRODUCTION conservation priorities in Venezuela (Rodrí- guez et al. 2004). Main threats for this rail The Plain-flanked Rail (Rallus wetmorei) is a are the loss and deterioration of mangrove Venezuelan endemic species deserving urgent habitat as a consequence of expanding attention from a conservation perspective. touristic developments and activities derived This bird was first described in the mid-1940s from petrochemical industries (Rodríguez & (Zimmer & Phelps 1944), and after a few Rojas-Suárez 2008). These problems even other observations during the following 10 exist within the boundaries of the few pro- years, it went unrecorded for almost three tected areas (three national parks and one decades, until rediscovered in 1999 (Hilty wildlife refuge) where the species is known to 2003). It is restricted to a small area along the occur. central coast of Venezuela where it is known Recovery efforts of endangered birds from eight localities (Taylor 1996), but in have been hampered by the lack of basic recent years, it has been found in only five of knowledge on their biology, thus, research these sites (Rodríguez-Ferraro & Lentino in focused on determining biological character- prep.).
    [Show full text]
  • California Clapper Rail (Rallus Longirostris Obsoletus) 5-Year Review
    California clapper rail (Rallus longirostris obsoletus ) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation Photo by Allen Edwards U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office Sacramento, California April 2013 5-YEAR REVIEW California clapper rail (Rallus longirostris obsoletus) I. GENERAL INFORMATION Purpose of 5-Year Reviews: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) is required by section 4(c)(2) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) to conduct a status review of each listed species at least once every 5 years. The purpose of a 5-year review is to evaluate whether or not the species’ status has changed since it was listed (or since the most recent 5-year review). Based on the 5-year review, we recommend whether the species should be removed from the list of endangered and threatened species, be changed in status from endangered to threatened, or be changed in status from threatened to endangered. The California clapper rail was listed as endangered under the Endangered Species Preservation Act in 1970, so was not subject to the current listing processes and, therefore, did not include an analysis of threats to the California clapper rail. In this 5-year review, we will consider listing of this species as endangered or threatened based on the existence of threats attributable to one or more of the five threat factors described in section 4(a)(1) of the Act, and we must consider these same five factors in any subsequent consideration of reclassification or delisting of this species. We will consider the best available scientific and commercial data on the species, and focus on new information available since the species was listed.
    [Show full text]
  • 550. Regulations for General Public Use Activities on All State Wildlife Areas Listed
    550. Regulations for General Public Use Activities on All State Wildlife Areas Listed Below. (a) State Wildlife Areas: (1) Antelope Valley Wildlife Area (Sierra County) (Type C); (2) Ash Creek Wildlife Area (Lassen and Modoc counties) (Type B); (3) Bass Hill Wildlife Area (Lassen County), including the Egan Management Unit (Type C); (4) Battle Creek Wildlife Area (Shasta and Tehama counties); (5) Big Lagoon Wildlife Area (Humboldt County) (Type C); (6) Big Sandy Wildlife Area (Monterey and San Luis Obispo counties) (Type C); (7) Biscar Wildlife Area (Lassen County) (Type C); (8) Buttermilk Country Wildlife Area (Inyo County) (Type C); (9) Butte Valley Wildlife Area (Siskiyou County) (Type B); (10) Cache Creek Wildlife Area (Colusa and Lake counties), including the Destanella Flat and Harley Gulch management units (Type C); (11) Camp Cady Wildlife Area (San Bernadino County) (Type C); (12) Cantara/Ney Springs Wildlife Area (Siskiyou County) (Type C); (13) Cedar Roughs Wildlife Area (Napa County) (Type C); (14) Cinder Flats Wildlife Area (Shasta County) (Type C); (15) Collins Eddy Wildlife Area (Sutter and Yolo counties) (Type C); (16) Colusa Bypass Wildlife Area (Colusa County) (Type C); (17) Coon Hollow Wildlife Area (Butte County) (Type C); (18) Cottonwood Creek Wildlife Area (Merced County), including the Upper Cottonwood and Lower Cottonwood management units (Type C); (19) Crescent City Marsh Wildlife Area (Del Norte County); (20) Crocker Meadow Wildlife Area (Plumas County) (Type C); (21) Daugherty Hill Wildlife Area (Yuba County)
    [Show full text]
  • Alpha Codes for 2168 Bird Species (And 113 Non-Species Taxa) in Accordance with the 62Nd AOU Supplement (2021), Sorted Taxonomically
    Four-letter (English Name) and Six-letter (Scientific Name) Alpha Codes for 2168 Bird Species (and 113 Non-Species Taxa) in accordance with the 62nd AOU Supplement (2021), sorted taxonomically Prepared by Peter Pyle and David F. DeSante The Institute for Bird Populations www.birdpop.org ENGLISH NAME 4-LETTER CODE SCIENTIFIC NAME 6-LETTER CODE Highland Tinamou HITI Nothocercus bonapartei NOTBON Great Tinamou GRTI Tinamus major TINMAJ Little Tinamou LITI Crypturellus soui CRYSOU Thicket Tinamou THTI Crypturellus cinnamomeus CRYCIN Slaty-breasted Tinamou SBTI Crypturellus boucardi CRYBOU Choco Tinamou CHTI Crypturellus kerriae CRYKER White-faced Whistling-Duck WFWD Dendrocygna viduata DENVID Black-bellied Whistling-Duck BBWD Dendrocygna autumnalis DENAUT West Indian Whistling-Duck WIWD Dendrocygna arborea DENARB Fulvous Whistling-Duck FUWD Dendrocygna bicolor DENBIC Emperor Goose EMGO Anser canagicus ANSCAN Snow Goose SNGO Anser caerulescens ANSCAE + Lesser Snow Goose White-morph LSGW Anser caerulescens caerulescens ANSCCA + Lesser Snow Goose Intermediate-morph LSGI Anser caerulescens caerulescens ANSCCA + Lesser Snow Goose Blue-morph LSGB Anser caerulescens caerulescens ANSCCA + Greater Snow Goose White-morph GSGW Anser caerulescens atlantica ANSCAT + Greater Snow Goose Intermediate-morph GSGI Anser caerulescens atlantica ANSCAT + Greater Snow Goose Blue-morph GSGB Anser caerulescens atlantica ANSCAT + Snow X Ross's Goose Hybrid SRGH Anser caerulescens x rossii ANSCAR + Snow/Ross's Goose SRGO Anser caerulescens/rossii ANSCRO Ross's Goose
    [Show full text]