Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Combined Licenses (Cols) for William States Lee III Nuclear Station Units 1 and 2

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Combined Licenses (Cols) for William States Lee III Nuclear Station Units 1 and 2 NUREG-2111, Vol. 2 Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Combined Licenses (COLs) for William States Lee III Nuclear Station Units 1 and 2 Draft Report for Comment U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of New Reactors Washington, DC 20555-0001 Regulatory Division Special Projects Branch Charleston District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Charleston, SC 29403-5107 AVAILABILITY OF REFERENCE MATERIALS IN NRC PUBLICATIONS NRC Reference Material Non-NRC Reference Material As of November 1999, you may electronically access Documents available from public and special technical NUREG-series publications and other NRC records at libraries include all open literature items, such as NRC=s Public Electronic Reading Room at books, journal articles, and transactions, Federal http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm.html. Register notices, Federal and State legislation, and Publicly released records include, to name a few, congressional reports. Such documents as theses, NUREG-series publications; Federal Register notices; dissertations, foreign reports and translations, and applicant, licensee, and vendor documents and non-NRC conference proceedings may be purchased correspondence; NRC correspondence and internal from their sponsoring organization. memoranda; bulletins and information notices; inspection and investigative reports; licensee event reports; and Commission papers and their Copies of industry codes and standards used in a attachments. substantive manner in the NRC regulatory process are maintained atC NRC publications in the NUREG series, NRC The NRC Technical Library regulations, and Title 10, Energy, in the Code of Two White Flint North Federal Regulations may also be purchased from one 11545 Rockville Pike of these two sources. Rockville, MD 20852B2738 1. The Superintendent of Documents U.S. Government Printing Office Mail Stop SSOP These standards are available in the library for Washington, DC 20402B0001 reference use by the public. Codes and standards are Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov usually copyrighted and may be purchased from the Telephone: 202-512-1800 originating organization or, if they are American Fax: 202-512-2250 National Standards, fromC 2. The National Technical Information Service American National Standards Institute Springfield, VA 22161B0002 11 West 42nd Street www.ntis.gov New York, NY 10036B8002 1B800B553B6847 or, locally, 703B605B6000 www.ansi.org 212B642B4900 A single copy of each NRC draft report for comment is available free, to the extent of supply, upon written request as follows: Legally binding regulatory requirements are stated only Address: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission in laws; NRC regulations; licenses, including technical Office of Administration specifications; or orders, not in Publications Branch NUREG-series publications. The views expressed in Washington, DC 20555-0001 contractor-prepared publications in this series are not E-mail: [email protected] necessarily those of the NRC. Facsimile: 301B415B2289 The NUREG series comprises (1) technical and Some publications in the NUREG series that are administrative reports and books prepared by the staff posted at NRC=s Web site address (NUREGBXXXX) or agency contractors http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs (NUREG/CRBXXXX), (2) proceedings of conferences are updated periodically and may differ from the last (NUREG/CPBXXXX), (3) reports resulting from printed version. Although references to material found international agreements (NUREG/IABXXXX), (4) on a Web site bear the date the material was brochures (NUREG/BRBXXXX), and (5) compilations accessed, the material available on the date cited may of legal decisions and orders of the Commission and subsequently be removed from the site. Atomic and Safety Licensing Boards and of Directors= decisions under Section 2.206 of NRC=s regulations (NUREGB0750). NUREG-2111, Vol. 2 Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Combined Licenses (COLs) for William States Lee III Nuclear Station Units 1 and 2 Draft Report for Comment Manuscript Completed: November 2011 Date Published: December 2011 Division of New Reactor Licensing Office of New Reactors U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Regulatory Division Special Projects Branch Charleston District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Charleston, SC 29403-5107 COMMENTS ON DRAFT REPORT Any party may submit comments on this report for consideration by the NRC staff. Comments may be accompanied by additional relevant information or supporting data. Please specify the report number NUREG-2111 in your comments and send them by the end of the 75-day comment period specified in the Federal Register notice announcing the availability of this draft. To submit comments: Chief, Rulemaking and Directives Branch Office of Administration Mail Stop: TWB-05-B01M U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Fax: (301) 492-3446 Electronic comments may be submitted to the NRC by e-mail at [email protected] For any additional information or copies of this draft, contact: Ms. Sarah L. Lopas Office of New Reactors Mail Stop: T-7E18 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Phone: 1-800-368-5642, extension 1147 Email: [email protected] Paperwork Reduction Act Statement This NUREG references information collection requirements that are subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). These information collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, approval numbers 3150-0014; 3150- 0011; 3150-0021; 3150-0151; 3150-0008; 3150-0002; and 3150-0093. Public Protection Notification The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting documents displays a currently valid OMB control number. NUREG-2111 has been reproduced from the best available copy. 1 Abstract 2 This environmental impact statement (EIS) has been prepared in response to an application 3 submitted to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) by Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 4 (Duke) for two combined construction permits and operating licenses (combined licenses or 5 COLs). The proposed actions requested in Duke’s application are (1) NRC issuance of COLs 6 for two nuclear power reactors at the William States Lee III Nuclear Station (Lee Nuclear 7 Station) site in Cherokee County, South Carolina, and (2) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 8 (USACE) permit action on a Department of the Army individual permit application to perform 9 certain construction activities on the site. USACE is participating with the NRC in preparing this 10 EIS as a cooperating agency and participates collaboratively on the review team. 11 This EIS includes the review team’s analysis that considers and weighs the environmental 12 impacts of building and operating two new nuclear units at the proposed Lee Nuclear Station 13 site and at alternative sites, and mitigation measures available for reducing or avoiding adverse 14 impacts. The EIS also addresses Federally listed species, cultural resources, and plant cooling 15 system design alternatives. 16 The EIS includes the evaluation of the proposed project’s impacts to waters of the United States 17 pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. USACE will conduct a public interest review in 18 accordance with the guidelines promulgated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 19 under authority of Section 404(b) of the Clean Water Act. The public interest review, which will 20 be addressed in the USACE’s permit decision document, will include an alternatives analysis to 21 determine the least environmentally damaging practicable alternative. 22 After considering the environmental aspects of the proposed NRC action, the NRC staff’s 23 preliminary recommendation to the Commission is that the COLs be issued as requested. This 24 recommendation is based on (1) the application, including Revision 1 of the environmental 25 report (ER) and the supplement to the ER, submitted by Duke; (2) consultation with Federal, 26 State, Tribal, and local agencies; (3) the staff’s independent review; (4) the staff’s consideration 27 of comments related to the environmental review that were received during the two public 28 scoping processes; and (5) the assessments summarized in this EIS, including the potential 29 mitigation measures identified in the ER and this EIS. USACE will issue its Record of Decision 30 based, in part, on this EIS. December 2011 iii Draft NUREG-2111 1 Contents 2 Abstract ......................................................................................................................................... iii 3 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................. xxxi 4 Abbreviations/Acronyms .......................................................................................................... xxxv 5 1.0 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1-1 6 1.1 Background .............................................................................................................. 1-3 7 1.1.1 Applications and Reviews ............................................................................. 1-3 8 1.1.1.1 NRC COL Application Review ....................................................... 1-4 9 1.1.1.2 USACE Permit Application Review ...............................................
Recommended publications
  • Water Supply & Wastewater
    Piedmont Triad Climate Resiliency Tool Kit Water Supply & Wastewater Introduction Water is a scarce natural resource in the Piedmont region. As the Piedmont Triad continues to grow and develop, and the demand for potable water increases, it has become increasingly important to monitor the surface water capacity available to fulfill our regional water demand. Short-term solutions to water issues are generally quick and necessary steps in reaction to immediate concerns. However, a long-term planning approach will better prepare local governments for the unique challenges facing our region. Investment in a deeper understanding of the complex and challenging political, regulatory, and environmental issues surrounding water supply will help guide decision-makers to consider future ramifications of options in resource planning. This assessment of current and future (20-50 years) water resource needs and wastewater treatment plant capacity includes the 12-county Piedmont Triad Regional Council (PTRC) Region (Alamance, Caswell, Davidson, Davie, Forsyth, Guilford, Montgomery, Randolph, Rockingham, Stokes, Surry, and Yadkin Counties). Water supply and wastewater capacity are assessed within the context of surface water availability, projected population growth, geography, current laws and regulations, water quality, and patterns of water use (water conservation and water reuse). Background Drinking water comes from two primary sources, surface water or groundwater. Surface water is the water found above ground in the form of rainwater runoff, streams, rivers, lakes and reservoirs. Groundwater is unseen and deep in the ground saturating porous sandy soils or fractures of bedrock. Surface water and groundwater affect each other. Groundwater comes to the surface (springs) and can help replenish surface water.
    [Show full text]
  • Power and Populations in the North Carolina Backcountry
    Journal of Backcountry Studies People of Desperate Fortune: Power and Populations in the North Carolina Backcountry BY JOSHUA LEE MCKAUGHAN Between the late 1740’s and the outbreak of the American Revolution, the western half of North Carolina underwent a rapid change from sparsely inhabited frontier to an area containing nearly one half of the colony’s population. To one period observer, these were merely “people of desperate fortune…without any property” hoping to exchange one “best poor man’s country” for another.1 Hoping to acquire sufficient acreage so that they and their children might achieve “competency” – or economic independence – these migrants sought to make the most of the opportunity offered by Carolina’s cheap fertile land. The farms they established commonly focused on subsistence crops and home industry. For many, the marketplace was a distant force to be tapped only for the goods that they or their neighbors desired but could not produce on their own.2 However, as European demand for wheat increased during the 1750’s, the back settlers responded to the market stimulus not only through their crop choices, but by increasing their petitions for improved connections to market areas. The more enterprising frontiersmen also added the labor of African and African-American slaves to that of their families in an attempt to not only increase their production of staples, but to increase their personal power and prestige – perhaps even to free themselves for officeholding and other pursuits. With this, the Backcountry grew to reflect eastern values – albeit on a rather more modest scale. The same blending of Backcountry and tidewater traditions found in the growing awareness of the market and slavery was no less conspicuous in the efforts of some back settlers to move up in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Wagon Road of the Carolinas
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1974 The Great Wagon Road of the Carolinas Richard George Remer College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Remer, Richard George, "The Great Wagon Road of the Carolinas" (1974). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539624870. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-w0y7-0655 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE GREAT WAGON ROAD OF THE CAROLIRAS A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Richard George Reiner 1974 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts HcUU 'Author Approved, August 1974 / f ? > O Q Richard Maxwell Brown . - „ v Edward M. Riley/ James Thompson sos^s TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS...................................... iv LIST OF M A P S ........................................... v ABSTRACT ............................................... vi INTRODUCTION ........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin Is the Cradle of Civilization in the Carolinas
    RIVER YA DKIN-PE E DEE BASIN he Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin is the cradle of civilization in the Carolinas. Here, T evidence of 12,000 years of activity documents the history of Native Americans in the Southeast. The basin’s gently contoured Uwharrie Mountains, the oldest mountain range in North America, played as much profile: a role in human settlement as the fertile Total miles of streams and rivers: rivers that slice through them. 5,862 SC In the early 19th century, the basin was the scene Total acres of lakes: of the nation’s first documented gold discovery. All 22,988 of this cultural bounty is set in a landscape ripe with aquatic Municipalities resources—cold-water and coolwater trout streams, slower-moving within basin: 93 Piedmont streams, and even streams with Coastal Plain characteristics. Much of the Yadkin Counties River is bound by a series of man-made lakes. within basin: 21 Size: 7,221 From its headwaters near Blowing Rock, the Yadkin River flows east and then south across square miles North Carolina’s densely populated midsection. It travels 203 miles—passing farmland; Population: draining the urban landscapes of Winston-Salem, Statesville, Lexington and Salisbury; and 1,675,937 fanning through seven man-made reservoirs before its name changes to the Pee Dee River (2010 U.S. Census) below Lake Tillery. The Pee Dee courses another 230 miles to the Atlantic, leaving North Carolina near the community of McFarlan and ending its journey at South Carolina’s Winyah Bay. The Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin bisects North Carolina, running north to south, neatly separating counties on its journey.
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT Report
    Sediment Fate and Transport DRAFT Report Alcoa Power Generating Inc. Yadkin Division Yadkin Project Relicensing (FERC No. 2197) SEDIMENT FATE AND TRANSPORT REPORT Draft Report December 2004 Prepared by Normandeau Associates, Inc. and PB Power Sediment Fate and Transport DRAFT Report Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................iii 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................1 2 LITERATURE REVIEW APPROACH .......................................................................................2 2.1 Purpose................................................................................................................................2 2.2 Sources of Information........................................................................................................2 3 SEDIMENT TRANSPORT LITERATURE REVIEW................................................................3 3.1 Erosion and Sediment Inventory Special Report ................................................................3 3.2 Sediment Characteristics of North Carolina Streams 1970-1979 .......................................6 3.3 Sources, Sinks, and Storage of River Sediment in the Atlantic Drainage of the United States .....................................................................................................................10 3.4 Water Quality of the Yadkin-Pee Dee River System,
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 72, No. 194/Tuesday, October 9, 2007/Rules and Regulations
    Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 9, 2007 / Rules and Regulations 57245 Location and case Date and name of newspaper Effective date of Community State and county No. where notice was published Chief executive officer of community modification No. Denton .............. City of Denton (07– July 19, 2007; July 26, 2007; The Honorable Perry McNeill, Mayor, City October 25, 2007 ........... 480194 06–0913P). Denton Record-Chronicle. of Denton, 215 East McKinney Street, Denton, TX 76201. El Paso ............. City of El Paso (06– August 23, 2007; August 30, The Honorable John Cook, Mayor, City of August 6, 2007 ............... 480214 06–B807P). 2007; El Paso Times. El Paso, City Hall, 10th Floor, Two Civic Center Plaza, El Paso, TX 79901. Harris ................ City of Houston (06– July 19, 2007; July 26, 2007; The Honorable Bill White, Mayor, City of July 30, 2007 .................. 480296 06–BG37P). Houston Chronicle. Houston, P.O. Box 1562, Houston, TX 77251. Medina .............. Unincorporated July 19, 2007; July 26, 2007; The Honorable James E. Barden, Medina June 29, 2007 ................ 480472 areas of Medina Hondo Anvil Herald. County Judge, Medina County Court- County (07–06– house, 1100 16th Street, Room 101, 0574P). Hondo, TX 78861. Palo Pinto ......... City of Mineral Wells July 19, 2007; July 26, 2007; The Honorable Clarence Holliman, Mayor, October 25, 2007 ........... 480517 (07–06–0680P). Mineral Wells Index. City of Mineral Wells, 115 Southwest First Street, Mineral Wells, TX 76068. Parker ............... Town of Annetta August 23, 2007; August 30, The Honorable Ken Hall, Mayor, Town of November 29, 2007 ........ 481664 North (07–06– 2007; Weatherford Democrat.
    [Show full text]
  • Basinwide Assessment Report Yadkin River Basin
    BASINWIDE ASSESSMENT REPORT YADKIN RIVER BASIN NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES Division of Water Resources Environmental Sciences Section Bioassessment Branch October 2013 This page was intentionally left blank TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION TO PROGRAM METHODS 3 BASIN DESCRIPTION 4 YADKIN RIVER HEADWATERS (HUC 03040101) 6 SOUTH YADKIN RIVER (HUC 03040101) 10 YADKIN RIVER (HUC 03040103) 13 LAKE TILLERY—PEE DEE RIVER (HUC 03040104) 15 ROCKY RIVER (HUC 03040105) 17 PEE DEE RIVER (HUC 03040201) 20 GLOASSARY 22 LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX 1 SUMMARY OF BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATE ASSESSMENT DATA 24 APPENDIX 2 SUMMARY OF FISH COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT DATA 25 APPENDIX 3 BENTHIC AND FISH COMMUNITY MONITORING STATION SUMMARIES 31 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1 WATERBODIES MONITORED IN HUC 03040101 7 TABLE 2 WATERBODIES MONITORED IN HUC 03040102 11 TABLE 3 WATERBODIES MONITORED IN HUC 03040103 13 TABLE 4 WATERBODIES MONITORED IN HUC 03040104 16 TABLE 5 WATERBODIES MONITORED IN HUC 03040105 18 TABLE 6 WATERBODIES MONITORED IN HUC 03040201 21 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1 GEOGRAPHICAL RELATIONSHIPS OF THE YADKIN RIVER BASIN 5 FIGURE 2 SAMPLING LOCATIONS IN HUC 03040101 6 FIGURE 3 SAMPLING LOCATIONS IN HUC 03040102 10 FIGURE 4 SAMPLING LOCATIONS IN HUC 03040103 12 FIGURE 5 SAMPLING LOCATIONS IN HUC 03040104 15 FIGURE 6 SAMPLING LOCATIONS IN HUC 03040105 17 FIGURE 7 SAMPLING LOCATIONS IN HUC 03040201 20 FIGURE 8 BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATE BIOCLASSIFICATION TRENDS: 1996-2011 24 FIGURE 9 DISTRIBUTION OF NCIBI RATINGS: 2011 25 FIGURE 10 NCIBI SCORES AND RATINGS BY SITE: 2011 26 FIGURE 11 NCIBI RATINGS: 2006-2011 27 FIGURE 12 NCIBI RATINGS: 1996-2011 27 FIGURE 13 NCIBI SCORES BY SITE: 1996-2011 28 FIGURE 14 BLACKSPOT AND YELLOW GRUB INFESTATION PHOTOGRAPHS 29 FIGURE 15 POPEYE INFECTION PHOTOGRAPHS 29 3 INTRODUCTIONS TO PRGRAM METHODS The Environmental Sciences Section collects a variety of biological, chemical, and physical data that can be used in many ways to assist the basinwide planning program.
    [Show full text]
  • South Yadkin River and Tributaries NC DWQ YADKIN - PEE DEE RIVER BASIN PLAN South Yadkin River HUC 03040102 2008
    SOUTH YADKIN RIVE R Subbasin HUC 03040102 Includes the South Yadkin River and Tributaries NC DWQ YADKIN - PEE DEE RIVER BASIN PLAN South Yadkin River HUC 03040102 2008 Yadkin - PEE DEE RIVER BASIN PLAN South YADKIN NC DWQ WATER QUALITY OVERVIE W Of the monitored streams in the South Yadkin River subbasin, 47 percent are WATERSHE D AT A GLANCE supporting for their designated uses; however, 53 percent are impaired. Of the CO UNTIES monitored waters habitat degradation is the largest stressor to meeting Aquatic Alexander, Davie, Iredell, Rowan Life standards, with 51 percent of the streams impacted or impaired because of habitat degradation. Overall, benthic macroinvertebrate samples indicate an MUNICIPALITIES improvement in bioclassification since the 2001 samples. Turbidity violations Taylorsville, Harmony, Mocksville, also contribute to impairments in the Aquatic Life category, with 39 percent Statesville, Troutman, Cleveland, of monitored streams listed as impaired. Fecal coliform is the parameter of Mooresville interest in the Recreation Use Support category, this bacteria accounts for 37 miles of impaired streams. PER M ITTE D FACILITIES NPDES WWTP: GENERAL DESCRIPTI O N Major 5 Minor 24 The South Yadkin River, hydrologic unit 03040102, consists of the South Yadkin NPDES Nondischarge: 8 River watershed and its major tributaries: Hunting, Rocky, Fourth, Third, and NPDES Stormwater: Second Creeks. The tributary streams constitute large watersheds in Iredell, General 791 Davie, and Rowan counties. Except for a very small portion of the headwater Individual 3 sections of Rocky, Hunting and North Hunting Creeks (in Wilkes and Yadkin Phase II 0 counties), which are located in the Eastern Blue Ridge Foothills ecoregion, the Animal Operations: 94 majority of the subbasin is located in the Southern Outer Piedmont and Northern Inner Piedmont ecoregions.
    [Show full text]
  • South Yadkin River Huc 01
    BASINWIDE ASSESSMENT REPORT YADKIN RIVER BASIN NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES Division of Water Quality Environmental Sciences Section April 2007 This page was intentionally left blank NCDENR, Division of Water Quality Basinwide Assessment Report - Yadkin River Basin - April 2006 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF APPENDICIES ........................................................................................................................4 LIST OF TABLES...................................................................................................................................5 LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................5 BASIN DESCRIPTION...........................................................................................................................6 YADKIN RIVER HUC 03040101 – YADKIN RIVER HEADWATERS ...................................................8 Description......................................................................................................................................8 Overview of Water Quality............................................................................................................10 River and Stream Assessment.....................................................................................................14 YADKIN RIVER HUC 03040102 – SOUTH YADKIN RIVER ..............................................................16 Description....................................................................................................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • WATER QUALITY of the YADKIN-PEE DEE RIVER SYSTEM, NORTH CAROLINA Variability, Pollution Loads, and Long-Term Trends
    WATER QUALITY OF THE YADKIN-PEE DEE RIVER SYSTEM, NORTH CAROLINA Variability, pollution loads, and long-term trends U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OPEN-FILE REPORT 81-613 Prepared in cooperation with the NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT WATER QUALITY OF THE YADKIN-PEE DEE RIVER SYSTEM, NORTH CAROLINA- VARIABILITY, POLLUTION LOADS, AND LONG-TERM TRENDS By Douglas Harned and Dann Meyer U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OPEN-FILE REPORT 81-643 Prepared in cooperation with the NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Raleigh, North Carolina 1981 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR JAMES G. WATT, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Doyle G. Frederick, Acting Director For Additional Information Copies of this report may Write to: be purchased from: U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Post Office Box 2857 Open-File Services Section Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 Branch of Distribution Box 25*125, Federal Center Denver, Colorado 80225 CONTENTS Page Abstract........................................................... 1 Introduction....................................................... 3 Purpose and scope.............................................. 3 Recent water-quality studies................................... 4 Acknowledgments.................................................... 5 Basin description.................................................. 6 Climate........................................................ 6 Streamflow..................................................... 8 Geology
    [Show full text]
  • The Yadkin and Pee Dee Rivers of North Carolina
    AA RiverRiver inin JeopardyJeopardy The Yadkin and Pee Dee Rivers of North Carolina By Brad Carpenter, Scott Jackson and Hope Taylor-Guevara Clean Water for North Carolina October 2002 1 SPECIAL T HANKS T O Our generous funders, including Fred and Alice Stanback, The Z. Smith Reynolds Foundation, The Jessie Smith Noyes Foundation, The Beldon Fund and The Julian Price Family Foundation, and all of our members in the Yadkin Basin. Jonathan Wishon, long time CWFNC Board Member from Mocksville, and the Davie Environmental Awareness League The Project for Appalachian Community and Environment for excellent maps. Andrew Hecht, Stanback Intern for summer, 2002, for assistance in searching the Permit Compliance System for problem water dischargers. Rick Maas and Marshall Tyler for reviewing drafts. 2 TABLE OF C ONTENTS Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... 4 Recommendations......................................................................................................................... 5 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 7 Sediment ............................................................................................................................ 7 Nutrients ............................................................................................................................ 8 Bacteria .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Carolina Thread Trail Master Plan for Rowan County Communities
    carolina thread trail master plan for rowan county communities October 2014 1 2 3 table of contents acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................... 6 executive summary .................................................................................................................................. 8 chapter 1: introduction Carolina Thread Trail ...................................................................................................................................... 15 chapter 2: greenway benefits Connecting Communities ................................................................................................................................ 19 Health ............................................................................................................................................................ 20 Economic ...................................................................................................................................................... 21 Environmental ............................................................................................................................................... 23 chapter 3: existing conditions Geography of the Study Area/Land Cover .......................................................................................................... 25 History .........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]