Effects of Seed Beetles on the Performance of Desert Legumes Depend on Host Species, Plant Stage, and Beetle Density

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Effects of Seed Beetles on the Performance of Desert Legumes Depend on Host Species, Plant Stage, and Beetle Density Journal of Arid Environments 80 (2012) 10e16 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Journal of Arid Environments journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jaridenv Effects of seed beetles on the performance of desert legumes depend on host species, plant stage, and beetle density C.W. Fox a,*, W.G. Wallin a, M.L. Bush a, M.E. Czesak b, F.J. Messina c a Department of Entomology, University of Kentucky, S225 Ag Science Center North, Lexington, KY 40546-0091, USA b Biology Department, Vassar College, Poughkeepsie, NY 12604, USA c Department of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, UT 82322-5305, USA article info abstract Article history: Seeds of many arid habitat plants have a water-impermeable coat and can germinate only after being Received 23 May 2011 scarified. Bruchine seed beetles are important parasites of legume seeds in these environments, but their Received in revised form effect on germination can be unpredictable. Beetles deplete seed resources and can kill the embryo but 1 December 2011 also scarify seeds. We investigated the effects of a generalist parasite, Stator limbatus, on the germination Accepted 19 December 2011 and growth of two common legumes in the Sonoran desert, catclaw acacia (Acacia greggii) and blue Available online 9 January 2012 paloverde (Parkinsonia florida). Feeding damage from a single larva greatly increased germination of paloverde but not acacia. This benefit was reduced if seeds were attacked by multiple larvae. Beetle- Keywords: Acacia damaged seeds of both hosts germinated more quickly than did control seeds. Infestation by beetles Germination reduced seedling size, though effects were greater for paloverde than for acacia. Our results demonstrate Paloverde that the effect of S. limbatus can be highly host-specific. In addition, beetle infestation may enhance or Scarification reduce seedling recruitment, depending on the availability of other scarifying agents and the number of Seed parasite larvae per seed. Such contingencies make it difficult to predict the net effect of seed beetles on efforts to Seedling growth control invasive legume hosts or establish native hosts during aridland restoration. Ó 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction (scarification) that allows water imbibition. Seeds of many arid habitat plants have evolved in association with a variety of scari- Seed germination is influenced by many abiotic and biotic fying agents, including fire, floods, soil abrasion, and soil microor- factors, including rainfall, temperature, soil properties, leaf litter, ganisms (Bewley and Black, 1994). Germination and seedling burial depth, and vegetative cover (Bewley and Black, 1994). The recruitment may also be improved by ingestion and defecation of timing of germination can have profound effects on seedling seeds by mammals and birds (Miller, 1994a; Rohner and Ward, survival and later life-history traits in plants (Kalisz, 1986). Deter- 1999; Traveset et al., 2001). Finally, scarification can be mediated mining the factors that affect germination and early seedling by insect damage, which often produces holes in the seed testa growth is thus necessary to predict the establishment and regen- (Mucunguzi, 1995; Takakura, 2002). eration of plants in native habitats and for choosing appropriate Seed beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchinae) are espe- plants to restore degraded lands (Sy et al., 2001). Many desert cially common predators and parasites of legume seeds in desert legumes play an important role in restoration ecology because they and tropical environments, and many are highly host-specific can tolerate aridity, fix atmospheric nitrogen, and provide food, (Ramirez and Traveset, 2010). Females generally lay eggs on or microhabitats, and shade for a diversity of organisms (Barnes, inside fruits, or they glue their eggs directly to seeds that are 2001; Camargo-Ricalde et al., 2004; Rohner and Ward, 1999). exposed in dehiscent pods or are found on the soil surface In arid and semi-arid environments, germination and seedling (Southgate, 1979). Larvae typically bore into the seed and complete growth are often limited by water availability (Bowers et al., 2004). development within a single seed. In some cases, seed-beetle larvae Many arid habitat legumes produce seeds with an impermeable may attack a majority of seeds in the local plant population, but coat, so that seeds can germinate only after damage to the seed coat infestation rates of some hosts can be chronically low (Miller, 1994a; Takakura, 2002). The net effects of seed beetle infestation on the germination and * Corresponding author. Tel.: þ1 859 257 7474; fax: þ1 859 323 1120. recruitment of host legumes can be unpredictable (Southgate, E-mail address: [email protected] (C.W. Fox). 1979). In some cases, the insect clearly acts as a seed predator; 0140-1963/$ e see front matter Ó 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2011.12.008 C.W. Fox et al. / Journal of Arid Environments 80 (2012) 10e16 11 larval feeding effectively kills the embryo or removes so much insect (Fox et al., 2010), we experimentally infested each host endosperm that the seed cannot germinate (Camargo-Ricalde et al., population with the same source population of S. limbatus.A 2004; El Atta, 1993; Tomaz et al., 2007). Larval feeding may also laboratory population of S. limbatus was established >300 beetles create openings for pathogenic bacteria and fungi (Chang et al., that had been collected from >20 A. greggii trees at the Oracle site. 2011; Cipollini and Stiles, 1991; Mucunguzi, 1995). Even if germi- Female S. limbatus oviposit directly onto host seeds inside fruits nation occurs, prior infestation of seeds may distort the develop- that have dehisced or have been damaged by other organisms, such ment of cotyledons or prevent the formation of true leaves (Hegazy as mice or other insects (including other seed beetles, Mitchell, and Eesa, 1991). Depletion of cotyledon reserves may slow plant 1977). Hatching larvae burrow into the seed beneath the oviposi- growth and hence reduce the probability of establishment. Beetle tion site. Because larvae cannot move between seeds, we could damage may even negatively affect non-infested seeds developing control larval density by manipulating the initial number of eggs in the same pods as infested ones, e.g., by mediating allocation of per seed. resource among seeds within the fruit (De Menezes et al., 2010). Despite these detrimental effects of seed-beetle damage, some 2.2. Treatments proportion of infested seeds will germinate successfully in most host populations (Halevy, 1974; Hoffman et al., 1989; Mack 1998; Seeds from each source population were divided among three Miller, 1994b,c). The fate of a damaged seed often depends on its treatments: control (no manipulation), beetle damage, or scarifi- size relative to that of its parasite, as well as the number of larvae cation. We scarified seeds by removing about 5% of the seed coat per seed (Fox et al., 2010). If beetle damage acts as a scarifying with sandpaper, which should promote imbibition of water agent, it can have a large, positive effect on the frequency of without affecting the underlying cotyledons. This technique has germination (Arévalo et al., 2010; Mucunguzi, 1995; Nakai et al., been widely used for physical scarification of desert legume seeds 2011). In one study, beetle infestation was considered a prerequi- (e.g., Patane and Gresta, 2006). To produce beetle-damaged seeds, site to successful germination (Takakura, 2002). Because their mated pairs of beetles were individually confined with five pre- effects on host performance can be so variable, bruchine beetles weighed seeds in a 30-mm Petri dish. Providing only five seeds have been implicated in aiding the spread of undesirable, invasive per dish caused females to lay multiple eggs per seed. Females were legumes (Arévalo et al., 2010) and, conversely, have been proposed allowed to lay eggs for w72 h and discarded. Eggs were scraped as biological control agents for such invasive hosts (van Klinken and from seeds to create densities ranging from one to five eggs per Flack, 2008). seed. Larvae within seeds were reared to adult emergence in This study examines the effects of seed beetle infestation and a laboratory growth chamber at 30 C. Because nearly all eggs hatch damage on two desert legumes: catclaw acacia, Acacia greggii Gray successfully (>95% of eggs hatch; Fox et al., 2007), the number of (Fabaceae: Mimosoideae), and blue paloverde, Parkinsonia florida eggs on a seed is a good estimate of larval density. Seeds from the (Bentham ex A. Gray) S. Watson (Fabaceae: Caesalpinioideae). Both three treatments were randomly interspersed in the chamber to species are common in the southwestern United States and ensure that all seeds experienced similar environmental northwestern Mexico. Germination of acacia and paloverde seeds is conditions. likely to be enhanced by scarification, which in Arizona may be After adult emergence from seeds had been completed, we accomplished by flash floods in gravelly soils, underground removed beetle frass from seeds by tapping the seed and inserting weathering, or ingestion by mammals (Longland et al., 2001; Or a small brush into beetle exit holes. Seeds were then reweighed to and Ward, 2003). Seeds of A. greggii and P. florida are also estimate the amount of mass removed by beetle infestation. frequently attacked by a generalist seed beetle, Stator limbatus Horn Because larval survival can be fairly low in seeds of blue paloverde (Fox et al., 1995, 1997; Siemens et al., 1992). This insect has a rela- (Fox et al., 1995; Fox and Mousseau, 1996), we carefully noted the tively wide geographic distribution and a broad host range total number of adults emerging from each seed. To remove biases (Stillwell et al., 2007, and references therein), but little is known caused by the presence of dead larvae inside seeds, we estimated about this beetle’s impact on host performance. To determine the beetle effects on plant performance using only those seeds from effect of S.
Recommended publications
  • Pima County Plant List (2020) Common Name Exotic? Source
    Pima County Plant List (2020) Common Name Exotic? Source McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abies concolor var. concolor White fir Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abies lasiocarpa var. arizonica Corkbark fir Devender, T. R. (2005) Abronia villosa Hariy sand verbena McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abutilon abutiloides Shrubby Indian mallow Devender, T. R. (2005) Abutilon berlandieri Berlandier Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon incanum Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abutilon malacum Yellow Indian mallow Devender, T. R. (2005) Abutilon mollicomum Sonoran Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon palmeri Palmer Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon parishii Pima Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Abutilon parvulum Dwarf Indian mallow Herbarium; ASU Vascular Plant Herbarium Abutilon pringlei McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Abutilon reventum Yellow flower Indian mallow Herbarium; ASU Vascular Plant Herbarium McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia angustissima Whiteball acacia Devender, T. R. (2005); DBGH McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia constricta Whitethorn acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia greggii Catclaw acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) Acacia millefolia Santa Rita acacia McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia neovernicosa Chihuahuan whitethorn acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Acalypha lindheimeri Shrubby copperleaf Herbarium Acalypha neomexicana New Mexico copperleaf McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acalypha ostryaefolia McLaughlin, S. (1992) Acalypha pringlei McLaughlin, S. (1992) Acamptopappus McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Rayless goldenhead sphaerocephalus Herbarium Acer glabrum Douglas maple McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acer grandidentatum Sugar maple McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acer negundo Ashleaf maple McLaughlin, S.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Coronado Revised Plan
    Coronado National United States Forest Department of Agriculture Forest Draft Land and Service Resource Management August 2011 Plan The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TTY). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Printed on recycled paper – Month and Year Draft Land and Resource Management Plan Coronado National Forest Cochise, Graham, Pima, Pinal, and Santa Cruz Counties, Arizona Hidalgo County, New Mexico Responsible Official: Regional Forester Southwestern Region 333 Broadway Boulevard SE Albuquerque, NM 87102 (505) 842-3292 For more information contact: Forest Planner Coronado National Forest 300 West Congress, FB 42 Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 388-8300 TTY 711 [email protected] ii Draft Land and Management Resource Plan Coronado National Forest Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction ...................................................................................... 1 Purpose of Land and Resource Management Plan ......................................... 1 Overview of the Coronado National Forest .....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Invasive Species in the Sonoran Desert Region
    3 Invasive Species in the Sonoran Desert Region 11 INVASIVE SPECIES IN THE SONORAN DESERT REGION Invasive species are altering the ecosystems of the Sonoran Desert Region. Native plants have been displaced resulting in radically different habitats and food for wildlife. Species like red brome and buffelgrass have become dense enough in many areas to carry fire in the late spring and early summer. Sonoran Desert plants such as saguaros, palo verdes and many others are not fire- adapted and do not survive these fires. The number of non-native species tends to be lowest in natural areas of the Sonoran Desert and highest in the most disturbed and degraded habitats. However, species that are unusually aggressive and well adapted do invade natural areas. In the mid 1900’s, there were approximately 146 non-native plant species (5.7% of the total flora) in the Sonoran Desert. Now non-natives comprise nearly 10% of the Sonoran Desert flora overall. In highly disturbed areas, the majority of species are frequently non-native invasives. These numbers continue to increase. It is crucial that we monitor, control, and eradicate invasive species that are already here. We must also consider the various vectors of dispersal for invasive species that have not yet arrived in Arizona, but are likely to be here in the near future. Early detection and reporting is vital to prevent the spread of existing invasives and keep other invasives from arriving and establishing. This is the premise of the INVADERS of the Sonoran Desert Region program at the Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum.
    [Show full text]
  • Cap Lter 1997-2000
    CAP LTER 1997-2000 Central Arizona – Phoenix LTER Land-Use Change and Ecological Processes in an Urban Ecosystem of the Sonoran Desert DEB-9714833 Prepared January 2001 for the National Science Foundation Site Review Team Visit Cover: Survey 200 long-term monitoring project begins in spring 2000. Photo by Tim Trimble, ASU CAP LTER 1997-2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction to CAP LTER 1 II. Highlights of Research Activities 3 Research Strategy 3 Long-Term Monitoring 3 Geophysical Context and Patch Typology 3 Survey 200: Interdisciplinary Long-Term Monitoring 5 Monitoring at Permanent Plots 6 Modeling 7 Core Research Activities 8 Primary Production and Organic Matter 8 Populations and Communities 9 Human Dimensions of Ecological Research 12 Biogeochemical Processes 16 Geomorphology and Disturbance 20 III. Education and Outreach 21 K-12 Education 21 Community Partners 22 Undergraduate and Graduate Education and Training 23 Postdoctoral Associates 24 Dissemination of Research Projects and Results 24 IV. Information Management 24 Resources 24 Procedures 25 V. Project Management 26 VI. Literature Cited 27 Appendices Appendix A. Products A-1 Presentations and Posters A-1 LTER Symposia and Conferences A-6 Theses and Dissertations, in Progress and Completed A-12 Books, Book Chapters, and Conference Proceedings A-13 Journal Articles A-14 Reports A-16 Community Outreach Presentations and Miscellaneous Activities A-16 Community Outreach Publications, News Articles about CAP LTER, and Other Non-Standard Publications A-17 Internal Publications, Reports, and Presentations A-20 Web Sites A-21 Grants Awarded A-21 Datasets A-23 Appendix B. Participants B-1 Appendix C. CAP LTER Projects 1997-2000 C-1 List of Figures Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology of the Bruchidae +6178
    Ann. Rev. Entomol 1979. 24:449-73 Copyright @ 1979 by Annual Reviews Inc. All rights reserved BIOLOGY OF THE BRUCHIDAE +6178 B. J. Southgate Biology Department, Pest Infestation Control Laboratory, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, and Food, Slough SL3 7HJ, Berks, England INTRODUCTION Species of Bruchidae breed in every continent except Antarctica. The larg­ est number of species live in the tropical regions of Asia, Africa, and Central and South America. Many species have obvious economic importance because they breed on grain legumes and consume valuable proteins that would otherwise be eaten by man. Other species, however, destroy seeds of an immense number of leguminous trees and shrubs, which, though they have no obvious economic value, stem the advance of the deserts into the marginal cultivated areas of the world. When this ecosystem is mismanaged by practices such as over­ grazing, then any organism that restricts the normal regeneration of seed­ lings will, in the long run, affect agriculture adversely. This has been demonstrated recently in some African and Middle Eastern semiarid zones (65). The present interest in the management of arid areas and in the introduc­ Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1979.24:449-473. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org Access provided by Copyright Clearance Center on 11/01/20. For personal use only. tion of alternative tree species to provide timber, fodder, or shade has stimulated a detailed study of the ecology of some leguminous trees and shrubs that has revealed some deleterious effects of bruchid beetles on the seeds of these plants (42, 43, 59). It has also emphasized the inadequacy of our knowledge of the taxonomy and biology of these beetles.
    [Show full text]
  • Cercidium Floridum (Parkinsonia Florida), Blue Palo Verde
    Cercidium floridum (Parkinsonia florida), Blue Palo Verde Horticultural Qualities Cercidium floridum , (Parkinsonia florida) Blue Palo Verde Foliage: Deciduous Mature Height: 20' - 35' Mature Width: 20' - 35' Growth Rate: Moderate Hardiness: 10 degrees F Exposure: Full Sun Leaf Color: Green to Pale Blue-Green Shade: Filtered Flower Color: Yellow Flower Shape: Funnel Shaped Petals Flower Season: Spring Thorns: Yes Box Sizes Produced: 24”, 36”, & 48” Propagation Method: Seed Arid Zone Trees, P. O. Box 167, Queen Creek, AZ 85242, Phone 480-987-9094 e-mail: [email protected] Cercidium floridum (Parkinsonia florida), Blue Palo Verde For year-round beauty and sheer volume of spring color, few desert- adapted trees can rival the Blue Palo Verde, Cercidium floridum. The only others that possibly could, Sonoran and Foothill Palo Verdes, are botanical cousins. Blue-green bark, smooth on younger branches but becoming more grayish and fissured as trees mature, gives color to the graceful trunks and highly divided branches while providing a dark green backdrop for the intense yellow spring flower display. Flowers first appear in early spring and may persist into early summer. In mature, vigorous specimens, flowers literally cover the leaf canopy, creating masses of yellow in the landscape or dotting desert hillsides. When properly pruned, the trees reveal the color, texture and sculp- tural qualities of their trunks. The canopy is made up of finely-divided branches armed with small thorns, and compound leaves with 5 to 10 tiny leaflets. Blue Palo Verde is native to the American southwest and northern Mexico (including Baja California) and is widely distributed across this range from sea level to four thousand feet.
    [Show full text]
  • Phoenix Active Management Area Low-Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List
    Arizona Department of Water Resources Phoenix Active Management Area Low-Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List Official Regulatory List for the Phoenix Active Management Area Fourth Management Plan Arizona Department of Water Resources 1110 West Washington St. Ste. 310 Phoenix, AZ 85007 www.azwater.gov 602-771-8585 Phoenix Active Management Area Low-Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List Acknowledgements The Phoenix AMA list was prepared in 2004 by the Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR) in cooperation with the Landscape Technical Advisory Committee of the Arizona Municipal Water Users Association, comprised of experts from the Desert Botanical Garden, the Arizona Department of Transporation and various municipal, nursery and landscape specialists. ADWR extends its gratitude to the following members of the Plant List Advisory Committee for their generous contribution of time and expertise: Rita Jo Anthony, Wild Seed Judy Mielke, Logan Simpson Design John Augustine, Desert Tree Farm Terry Mikel, U of A Cooperative Extension Robyn Baker, City of Scottsdale Jo Miller, City of Glendale Louisa Ballard, ASU Arboritum Ron Moody, Dixileta Gardens Mike Barry, City of Chandler Ed Mulrean, Arid Zone Trees Richard Bond, City of Tempe Kent Newland, City of Phoenix Donna Difrancesco, City of Mesa Steve Priebe, City of Phornix Joe Ewan, Arizona State University Janet Rademacher, Mountain States Nursery Judy Gausman, AZ Landscape Contractors Assn. Rick Templeton, City of Phoenix Glenn Fahringer, Earth Care Cathy Rymer, Town of Gilbert Cheryl Goar, Arizona Nurssery Assn. Jeff Sargent, City of Peoria Mary Irish, Garden writer Mark Schalliol, ADOT Matt Johnson, U of A Desert Legum Christy Ten Eyck, Ten Eyck Landscape Architects Jeff Lee, City of Mesa Gordon Wahl, ADWR Kirti Mathura, Desert Botanical Garden Karen Young, Town of Gilbert Cover Photo: Blooming Teddy bear cholla (Cylindropuntia bigelovii) at Organ Pipe Cactus National Monutment.
    [Show full text]
  • Surveying for Terrestrial Arthropods (Insects and Relatives) Occurring Within the Kahului Airport Environs, Maui, Hawai‘I: Synthesis Report
    Surveying for Terrestrial Arthropods (Insects and Relatives) Occurring within the Kahului Airport Environs, Maui, Hawai‘i: Synthesis Report Prepared by Francis G. Howarth, David J. Preston, and Richard Pyle Honolulu, Hawaii January 2012 Surveying for Terrestrial Arthropods (Insects and Relatives) Occurring within the Kahului Airport Environs, Maui, Hawai‘i: Synthesis Report Francis G. Howarth, David J. Preston, and Richard Pyle Hawaii Biological Survey Bishop Museum Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817 USA Prepared for EKNA Services Inc. 615 Pi‘ikoi Street, Suite 300 Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96814 and State of Hawaii, Department of Transportation, Airports Division Bishop Museum Technical Report 58 Honolulu, Hawaii January 2012 Bishop Museum Press 1525 Bernice Street Honolulu, Hawai‘i Copyright 2012 Bishop Museum All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America ISSN 1085-455X Contribution No. 2012 001 to the Hawaii Biological Survey COVER Adult male Hawaiian long-horned wood-borer, Plagithmysus kahului, on its host plant Chenopodium oahuense. This species is endemic to lowland Maui and was discovered during the arthropod surveys. Photograph by Forest and Kim Starr, Makawao, Maui. Used with permission. Hawaii Biological Report on Monitoring Arthropods within Kahului Airport Environs, Synthesis TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents …………….......................................................……………...........……………..…..….i. Executive Summary …….....................................................…………………...........……………..…..….1 Introduction ..................................................................………………………...........……………..…..….4
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3. Vanishing Riparian Mesquite Bosques: Their Uniqueness and Recovery Potential
    Chapter 3. Vanishing Riparian Mesquite Bosques: Their Uniqueness and Recovery Potential R. Roy Johnson, Tanner S. Carothers, and Steven W. Carothers Introduction The “mesquite bosque” (Spanish for “forest” or “woodland”), one of the most unique and productive southwestern riparian habitat types, was once far more abundant than it is today. Twenty-five years ago, Stromberg (1993), with a focus on Arizona, provided an excellent review on the ecology, decline, existing threats, and potential for recovery of these mesquite forests. By 1993 the iconic mesquite bosque riparian habitat was in serious decline, due primarily to anthropogenic activities. Stromberg (1993) observed that previous attempts at habitat restoration were of limited success and indicated that much of the significant bosque habitat loss was largely the result of human-induced changes in the biotic and abiotic conditions and processes in river floodplains specifically required by species of mesquite (Prosopis spp.). In this chapter, we update elements of Stromberg’s 1993 review and provide a classification between two types of bosques based on distinct vegetation associations along a relatively dry to wet riparian continuum. We also discuss the uniqueness of mesquite bosques as wildlife habitat and chronicle the loss of some of the more distinctive of these forests in Arizona as well as conditions that led to their disappearance. Lastly, we suggest opportunities for a timely approach to mesquite habitat restoration that will likely arise as a result of recent litigation resolution between the Department of Agriculture and the Center for Biological Diversity and the Maricopa Audubon Society. The Mesquite Bosque Mesquite (Prosopis spp.) forests, or bosques, historically represented one of the most widespread of riparian communities in the Southwest.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Climate Zones and Their Application to Growing Plants Ursula Schuch
    az1673 July 2015 Arizona Climate Zones and their Application to Growing Plants Ursula Schuch Plants grow best in climates to which they are most adapted. Knowing the climate zone of a location is one of the factors to successfully cultivate plants outdoors. While soil, water, and light are critical, low or high temperatures can limit plant growth in a certain location. Arizona is a large state spanning 335 miles east to west and 390 miles north to south with diverse climate zones. The climate is influenced by elevation which determines the high and low temperatures, and by rainfall which varies across the state. Rainfall ranges from 3 inches annually in Yuma, the southwestern corner of Arizona, to more than 30 inches in the mountain areas. Arizona’s climate is classified as arid or semi-arid because evapotranspiration, the combined loss of water from soil and plants in a location, is greater than the amount of rainfall the area receives. How should climate zones be used by landscapers and gardeners? Climate zones are useful to understand the temperature limitations of a location and select appropriate plants for long-term successful plant performance. Microclimates and unseasonal low temperatures, such as an early freeze in fall before plants have hardened off or a late freeze in spring after plant growth or flowering has started, can cause damage Fig. 1. Physiographic Provinces of Arizona. Photo credit: Arizona Department of Water Resources. although the minimum annual temperatures have not been exceeded. For plants to thrive continually in a location, other factors such as soil quality, water and fertilizer availability, light, wind, and exposure to extreme conditions will affect Central Highlands, is characterized by rugged mountains, and plant growth and health.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Evaluation Baseline Hydrologic & Geotechnical Data Gathering Activities on Tonto National Forest ______Resolution Copper Mining
    BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION BASELINE HYDROLOGIC & GEOTECHNICAL DATA GATHERING ACTIVITIES ON TONTO NATIONAL FOREST ______________________________ RESOLUTION COPPER MINING Prepared for: USDA FOREST SERVICE TONTO NATIONAL FOREST Globe Ranger District Pinal County, Arizona Contact Person: MARK TAYLOR FOREST MINERALS BIOLOGIST 5140 E. Ingram Street Mesa, Arizona 85205 Prepared by: 4001 E. Paradise Falls Drive Tucson, Arizona 85712 June 2014 Project No. 0807.90 02 03-0340 Baseline Activities – Biological Evaluation Resolution Copper Mining TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE .................................................................................................... 3 2. PROJECT LOCATION ........................................................................................................................ 3 3. PROPOSED ACTION .......................................................................................................................... 3 4. PROPOSED ACTION AREA DESCRIPTION ................................................................................... 4 4.1. Physical Environment ................................................................................................................... 4 4.2. Land Use ....................................................................................................................................... 4 4.3. Aquatic and Riparian Resources ................................................................................................... 5 4.4. Vegetation Communities and Major
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report Template
    final reportp NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT Project code: B.NBP.0366 Prepared by: Tim Heard CSIRO Entomology Date published: June 2010 ISBN: 9781741913989 PUBLISHED BY Meat & Livestock Australia Limited Locked Bag 991 NORTH SYDNEY NSW 2059 Development of new biocontrol agents of Bellyache bush and Parkinsonia Meat & Livestock Australia acknowledges the matching funds provided by the Australian Government to support the research and development detailed in this publication. This publication is published by Meat & Livestock Australia Limited ABN 39 081 678 364 (MLA). Care is taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this publication. However MLA cannot accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the information or opinions contained in the publication. You should make your own enquiries before making decisions concerning your interests. Reproduction in whole or in part of this publication is prohibited without prior written consent of MLA. Development of new biocontrol agents of Bellyache bush and Parkinsonia Abstract This project pushed the prospects for biocontrol of the weeds bellyache bush and parkinsonia to a higher level. Previously, a significant amount of survey work had been done in Central America looking for potential biocontrol agents but the species resulting from those surveys had not been identified or prioritised. Our MLA funded project surveyed new areas of South America, identified the entire insect fauna and assessed their potential for release in Australia. Before this project, we had not identified any high potential agents, now we have three agents for parkinsonia that have a high probability of being suitable for introduction into Australia. We have been less successful with bellyache bush but at least we now know with certainty that this target weed has few prospects.
    [Show full text]