DOCSLIB.ORG

Suffering Art Gladly Also by Jerrold Levinson

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Suffering Art Gladly Also by Jerrold Levinson Suffering Art Gladly Also by Jerrold Levinson MUSIC, ART, AND METAPHYSICS THE PLEASURES OF AESTHETICS MUSIC IN THE MOMENT CONTEMPLATING ART AESTHETICS AND ETHICS ( editor ) THE OXFORD HANDBOOK OF AESTHETICS ( editor ) AESTHETIC CONCEPTS ( co-editor with Emily Brady ) ART AND PORNOGRAPHY ( co-editor with Hans Maes ) Suffering Art Gladly The Paradox of Negative Emotion in Art Edited by Jerrold Levinson Department of Philosophy, University of Maryland, USA ISBN 978-1-349-34598-4 ISBN 978-1-137-31371-3 (eBook) DOI 10.1057/9781137313713 Selection, introduction and editorial matter © Jerrold Levinson 2014 Chapters © Contributors 2014 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 2014 978-0-230-34983-4 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No portion of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, Saffron House, 6–10 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TS. Any person who does any unauthorized act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The authors have asserted their rights to be identified as the authors of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published 2014 by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN Palgrave Macmillan in the UK is an imprint of Macmillan Publishers Limited, registered in England, company number 785998, of Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS. Palgrave Macmillan in the US is a division of St Martins Press LLC, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010. Palgrave Macmillan is the global academic imprint of the above companies and has companies and representatives throughout the world. Palgrave® and Macmillan® are registered trademarks in the United States, the United Kingdom, Europe and other countries. This book is printed on paper suitable for recycling and made from fully managed and sustained forest sources. Logging, pulping and manufacturing processes are expected to conform to the environmental regulations of the country of origin. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. A catalog record for this book is available from the Library of Congress. Contents List of Figures vii Acknowledgements viii Notes on Contributors ix Introduction x Jerrold Levinson Part I Historical Perspectives 1 Aristotle on the Paradox of Tragic Pleasure 3 Pierre Destrée 2 The Resolution and Dissolution of the Paradox of Negative Emotions in the Aesthetics of the Eighteenth Century 28 Carole Talon-Hugon 3 A Lust of the Mind: Curiosity and Aversion in Eighteenth-Century British Aesthetics 45 Carolyn Korsmeyer 4 On Mere Suffering: Hume and the Problem of Tragedy 68 Christopher Williams 5 The Problem and Promise of the Sublime: Lessons from Kant and Schopenhauer 84 Sandra Shapshay Part II Contemporary Perspectives 6 A Simple Solution to the Paradox of Negative Emotion 111 Rafael De Clercq 7 Painful Art and the Limits of Well-Being 123 Aaron Smuts 8 That Obscure Object of Desire: Pleasure in Painful Art 153 Jonathan Gilmore 9 Playing with Fire: Art and the Seductive Power of Pain 171 Iskra Fileva v vi Contents 10 Heavenly Hurt: The Joy and Value of Sad Poetry 186 Anna Christina Ribeiro 11 Negative Emotions and Creativity 207 Derek Matravers 12 Attention, Negative Valence, and Tragic Emotions 224 Cain Todd 13 Watching the Unwatchable: Irréversible , Empire , and the Paradox of Intentionally Inacessible Art 246 David Davies Index 267 List of Figures 5.1 Caspar David Friedrich, Wanderer above the Sea of Fog , 1818 94 5.2 Julian Rosefeldt, My home is a dark and cloud-hung land , 2011 95 5.3 Christo & Jeanne-Claude, Running Fence, Sonoma and Marin Counties 1972–76 97 vii Acknowledgements I thank above all my good friend and colleague Pierre Destrée, and in three respects. First, for the original and excellent idea for this volume, one that would encompass chapters with both historical and contempo- rary emphases on the theme of negative emotion in art. Second, for his efforts in organizing the conference held in Belgium in March 2009 at which some of the essays here assembled were first presented. And third, for his valuable counsel and advice throughout the rather protracted editing period. I next thank the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven and the Université Catholique de Louvain for their hosting and support of the aforementioned conference. Thanks are also due to the Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique and the Fondation Francqui for important financial support. I am grateful, finally, to all the contributors for their valuable contributions, and I thank especially those who were part of the project from the beginning for their patience during the process of bringing this volume to fruition. Jerrold Levinson viii Notes on Contributors Rafael De Clercq is Associate Professor and Head, Department of Visual Studies at Lingnan University, Hong Kong. David Davies is Professor of Philosophy at McGill University, Canada. Pierre Destrée is Associate Professor of Philosophy at the Université Catholique de Louvain, Belgium. Iskra Fileva is Visiting Assistant Professor at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA. Jonathan Gilmore is Visiting Scholar at Columbia University, USA. Carole Talon-Hugon is Professor of Philosophy at the Université de Nice, France. Carolyn Korsmeyer is Professor of Philosophy at the State University of New York at Buffalo, USA. Derek Matravers is Professor of Philosophy at the Open University, UK. Anna Christina Ribeiro is Associate Professor of Philosophy at Texas Tech University, USA. Sandra Shapshay is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Indiana University, Bloomington, USA. Aaron Smuts is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Rhode Island College, USA. Cain Todd is Lecturer in Philosophy at Lancaster University, UK and Visiting Research Fellow at the University of Fribourg, Switzerland. Christopher Williams is Associate Professor of Philosophy at the University of Nevada, Reno, USA. ix Introduction Jerrold Levinson A friend goes to see Bresson’s Mouchette or Haneke’s Piano Teacher or Kubrick’s The Shining at the local repertory cinema. Why not go see Duck Soup or All About Eve or Singing in the Rain instead? Another friend chooses a chamber music programme featuring Shostakovich’s Quartet No. 8 in C minor and Beethoven’s Quartet in A minor op. 132. Why not choose the programme with Haydn’s ‘Sunrise’ Quartet and Tchaikovsky’s Souvenir de Florence? A third friend decides to attend a performance of Shakespeare’s wrenching Othello rather than one of his delightful Twelfth Night, while a fourth friend opts for a performance of Verdi’s heart-rending Otello rather than a performance of his amiable Falstaff. This behaviour is, at least at first blush, mildly puzzling. What moves people to choose to experience works of art that are wrenching, depressing, exhausting, horrifying, distressing, soul-searing, angst-in- ducing, and so on, when there are so many others, of perhaps equal worth, that are, by contrast, amusing, uplifting, charming, exalting, entrancing, heart-warming, life-affirming and the like? The strange fact is that we do hardly shy away from, but instead often seek out, relish, and take satisfaction in the experience of negative emotions from art of a tragic, fearful, pessimistic, or disturbing nature. How can we explain the satisfaction taken in experiencing art when it is the vehicle of nega- tive emotions, ones that are at least apparently unpleasant or undesir- able, and that one normally tries to avoid experiencing? Why works of art that arouse negative emotions have a value and an appeal for us that are at least as powerful as the appeal and value of works that either arouse positive emotions or do not engage us emotionally, is an enduring conundrum, one whose interest outstrips the narrow confines of professional philosophy, as it is likely to have troubled the spirit of almost any person who is interested in art at some time or other. The chapters in this volume all address, from a variety of angles, more or less that conundrum. As a problem in philosophical aesthetics it has traditionally been labelled ‘the paradox of tragedy’, though the problem goes well beyond that of explaining our attitudes and responses to x Introduction xi tragic theatre narrowly speaking, since it also arises in relation to horror films, melodramas, tearjerkers, blues songs, as well as certain sympho- nies, paintings, novels, and poems – in short, any work of art, whether high art or low, whose character or content is such as to raise negative, hence ostensibly unwelcome, emotions in those who appreciate it. The problem already figures prominently in the first important treatise on aesthetic theory in Western thought, namely Aristotle’s Poetics , where the doctrine of catharsis is proposed to deal with it, and is subsequently addressed in varying ways by Hume, Burke, Diderot, Kant, Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, evolving in some of those thinkers into a meditation on the quasi-paradoxical phenomenon of the sublime and our experience of it, whether in nature or in art. I should note at this point that not all theorists who have addressed the problem that concerns us regard it as a paradox, since it possibly does not fit a strict definition of that term, as it involves a set of jointly incompatible yet individually plausible propositions. For convenience, however, I will continue to refer to the problem as a paradox, though ‘puzzle’, ‘enigma’, and ‘conundrum’ are perhaps equally apt designa- tions for it. The present volume is divided into two parts, corresponding to the two primary emphases displayed by the chapters brought together here. The chapters in Part One, having primarily historical emphasis and focusing on a number of important figures in the history of aesthetic thought, are by Pierre Destrée, Carole Talon-Hugon, Carolyn Korsmeyer, Christopher Williams, and Sandra Shapshay.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Art and Emotions1
    International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies Int. J. Appl. Psychoanal. Studies 10(2): 100–107 (2013) Published online in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) DOI: 10.1002/aps.1352 Art and Emotions1 PINCHAS NOY AND DORIT NOY-SHARAV ABSTRACT The article explores the different routes by which art, and especially music conveys and arouses emotions. Apart from the three formerly discussed routes: the narrative route of narration-identification, the direct route of isomorphism and the indirect route of ego mastery, a fourth route is presented, based on the emotions produced by the listener himself as the result of his active attempt to process the musical input in his mind. This is a “Meta emotion” reflecting the sum-total of all the disparate and opposing emotions conveyed or aroused by means of the other three routes. The point is made that the assimilation of classical polyphonic music, demands an active effort on the part of the listener. The same is true of other higher rank arts, each one of which has developed its specific means to transmit a wide spectrum of diverse emotions simultaneously. Attached to this challenge, there is the promise of earning a new experience – a Meta-emotion emanating from the ability to integrate the contrarieties inside us. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Key words: aesthetic experience, polyphonic music, artistic enjoyment, emotional response, creativity, perfect form in art, art and emotions In a former paper “How Music Convey Emotions” (Noy, 1993) I presented three different routes by which the artist may succeed in evoking in his or her audience an emotional response.
    [Show full text]
  • Cause and Affect War Art and Emotion
    Canadian Military History Volume 21 Issue 1 Article 5 2015 Cause and Affect War Art and Emotion Laura Brandon Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.wlu.ca/cmh Part of the Military History Commons Recommended Citation Laura Brandon "Cause and Affect War Art and Emotion." Canadian Military History 21, 1 (2015) This Canadian War Museum is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in Canadian Military History by an authorized editor of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. : Cause and Affect War Art and Emotion Cause and Affect War Art and Emotion Laura Brandon ine years ago, I completed a which you bring things you know is a well-known Toronto-based Nhistory PhD here at Carleton and have experienced emotionally artist. She began painting military University. My thesis was published and with which through a dialogue subjects in the aftermath of the 1990 in 2006 as Art or Memorial? The with the artwork, its interpreters, to 1991 Gulf War and, 20 years later, Forgotten History of Canada’s War and other viewers you not only military portraiture remains at the Art.1 Influenced by the then relatively enrich your own understanding of heart of her practice. Her approach new memory theories, especially what you already recognize or have combines a certain accuracy of detail those pertaining to monuments as knowledge of emotionally but you born of her interest in historical “sites of memory,” I argued that also contribute to the emotional documentation combined with the through the act of looking, whether understanding of others.
    [Show full text]
  • Jerrold Levinson's Musical Concerns: Essays In
    ___________________________________________________________________________ Book Review LEVINSON, JERROLD. Musical Concerns: Essays in Philosophy of Music. Oxford University Press 2015, 176 pp., $45 hardcover. Reviewed by Caterina Moruzzi Musical Concerns collects twelve essays written by Jerrold Levinson between 2006 and 2014. The value of this collection consists in providing insights both into traditional discussions of the philosophy of music, such as the music-emotion relation, and into alternative and emerging ones, such as the idiosyncrasies of jazz and the values possessed by music. In the first essay, “Philosophy and Music,” Levinson highlights the beneficial results these two disciplines can obtain from mutual engagement. In addition to the more traditional interrelation between composers who look to philosophical theories to get inspiration for their works and philosophers influenced by musical works, he identifies three features common to philosophy and music: the search for completeness (9–10), their nature as forms of thought (10–13), and their deep usefulness despite superficial impracticality (13). “Indication, Abstraction, and Individuation” contrasts a theory developed by Levinson with formalist theories that identify the nature of musical works with their pure form and structure. 1 Levinson’s musical contextualism ascribes ontological importance also to contextual factors such as composer, time of composition, and instrumentation. The creation of the work is carried out by an act of artistic indication, the result of a deliberate choice that sets the standards for the performance of the work itself (50), which assigns to the author’s creation the status of artwork. The next essential step after the creation of a work is its reception by an audience: “The Aesthetic Appreciation of Music” deals with different kinds of appreciation the audience can experience by listening to music.
    [Show full text]
  • 1993 PROGRAM COMMITTEE NOTE: All Friday Afternoon Sessions Are at the LEVINSON and the RESISTING READER: William J
    9:30 - 10:25 am VISTA MAR MONTE II IS THERE A DEFINITlDN OF ART? Vanda Boziccvic) Philosophy, University of Croatia 2:00 - 3:50 pm COMMENT: Stephanie Ross, Philosophy, FOUR QUESTIONS FOR MARGOLIS University of Missouri/Saint LOt~is Michael Krausz, Philosophy, Brytl Mawr C HAIR: Roger Shiner, Philosophy, University of Alberta MARGOLIS AND THE METAPHYSICS OF CULTURE Dale Jacquette, Philosophy, Pennsylvania State University Break: 10:30 - 10:45 am COMMENT: joseph Margolis, Philosophy, Tempi, University 10:45 - II :40 am CHAIR: Curtis Carter, Philosophy, Marquette University THE IMPACT OF JAZZ ON CHINESE AUDIENCES Shirley Kennedy, Black Studies, Break: 4:00 - 4:15 pm University of California/Santa Barbara COMMENT: David Samue ls, Anthropology, , 4:15 - 5:10 pm University of Texas/Austin PAINTINGS AND FRAMES CHAIR: jo Ellen jacobs, Philosophy, Millikin University Barbara Savedoft; Philosophy, CUNY/Baruch College COMMENT: Claudia Sole, Santa Barbara 11:45 am - 12:40 pm CHAIR: Susa n FC::lgin, Philosophy, IL FAUT ETRE ABSOLUMENT RADICALIEI University of Missouri/ Kansas City Peter Madsen, Comparative Literature, University of Copenhagen COMMENT: Gary Shapiro, Philosophy, VISTA MA1~ MONTli III University of Richmond CHAIR: Mechthild Nagel, Philosophy, 2:00 - 4:00 pm Uni.versity of Massachusetts/Amh errt AESTHETICS AND YOUNG PEOPLE Marcia Eaton, PIJi/flwph.y, Ut/i,',.,'sily oj'Mimll:sota Cynthia Rost:lt1koW I'k.I, I'lul(/ltlp/~y, Sa" losr Seate University VISTA MAR MONTE III Ellen Handler Spill, P''Ytl!j·,fU'Y, Cornell Vlli"frllly Alr, IIII,! (
    [Show full text]
  • The Distancing-Embracing Model of the Enjoyment of Negative Emotions in Art Reception
    BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES (2017), Page 1 of 63 doi:10.1017/S0140525X17000309, e347 The Distancing-Embracing model of the enjoyment of negative emotions in art reception Winfried Menninghaus1 Department of Language and Literature, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, 60322 Frankfurt am Main, Germany [email protected] Valentin Wagner Department of Language and Literature, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, 60322 Frankfurt am Main, Germany [email protected] Julian Hanich Department of Arts, Culture and Media, University of Groningen, 9700 AB Groningen, The Netherlands [email protected] Eugen Wassiliwizky Department of Language and Literature, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, 60322 Frankfurt am Main, Germany [email protected] Thomas Jacobsen Experimental Psychology Unit, Helmut Schmidt University/University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg, 22043 Hamburg, Germany [email protected] Stefan Koelsch University of Bergen, 5020 Bergen, Norway [email protected] Abstract: Why are negative emotions so central in art reception far beyond tragedy? Revisiting classical aesthetics in the light of recent psychological research, we present a novel model to explain this much discussed (apparent) paradox. We argue that negative emotions are an important resource for the arts in general, rather than a special license for exceptional art forms only. The underlying rationale is that negative emotions have been shown to be particularly powerful in securing attention, intense emotional involvement, and high memorability, and hence is precisely what artworks strive for. Two groups of processing mechanisms are identified that conjointly adopt the particular powers of negative emotions for art’s purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Emotions and the Arts in Nineteenth-Century English Literature
    GENERAL TOPIC: The Emotions and the Arts in Nineteenth-century English Literature SPECIFIC THEME: Literary Representations of the Emotions in the Arts Principal Researcher: Paula Alexandra Guimarães Centre for Humanistic Studies (University of Minho) Introductory Remarks Although generated by neurobiological processes, emotions (pathe, affectus) also consist in a process of appraisal and individual judgement, which depends on social and cultural norms and individual proclivities. As they heavily influence social relations and the behaviour of individuals and groups, emotions are socially relevant and, consequently, subject to scrutiny, judgement, and normative intervention. They fulfil social functions and follow social rules. Hence, they are potentially subject to change and are shaped by the society in which they operate. Although it can be argued that emotions are a universal phenomenon, they do have a history and are a very important subject of historical research. This applies both to emotions closely connected with socio-cultural norms (e.g. friendship, pity, honour, shame, pride) and to ‘basic emotions’ (e.g. fear, hope, joy, grief, disgust, despair, love, lust, envy). Emotions are important both as subject and as background of textual sources. Most (if not all) textual and pictorial sources at our disposal are directly or indirectly generated by emotions, display emotions or aim to arouse emotions. Admittedly, the emotional background is more evident and significant in some sources than in others. The study of the emotions is an emergent interdisciplinary ×eld, which means that scholars from different disciplines (mainly literature, history, philosophy and cultural geography) are interested in the subject, and come together to work out how to discuss it.
    [Show full text]
  • Oxford Scholarship Online
    The Arts, Emotion, and Evolution University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship Online Aesthetics and the Sciences of Mind Greg Currie, Matthew Kieran, Aaron Meskin, and Jon Robson Print publication date: 2014 Print ISBN-13: 9780199669639 Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2014 DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199669639.001.0001 The Arts, Emotion, and Evolution Noël Carroll DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199669639.003.0009 Abstract and Keywords In this chapter, Carroll attempts to defend the view that art is an adaptation on that grounds that by means of provoking contagious emotions it promotes fellow feeling and thereby abets social cohesion. Keywords: art and emotion, evolution, emotional contagion, Leo Tolstoy, function of art, group selection, origin of art 8.1 Introduction In the opening chapters of What is Art?, Tolstoy comments at length—and often satirically —on the vast investment of resources and labour that went into the production of the art of his day. He writes: For the production of every ballet, circus, opera, operetta, exhibition, picture, concert or printed book, the intense and unwilling labor of thousands of people is Page 1 of 24 PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: CUNY Graduate Center; date: 22 July 2015 The Arts, Emotion, and Evolution needed at what is often harmful and humiliating work.
    [Show full text]
  • ￢ﾀﾜhow Does This Artwork Make You Feel?￢ﾀﾝ a ￢ﾀﾜno-No￢ﾀﾝ
    “How Does This Artwork Make You Feel?” A “No-No” Question in Art Museum Education? Olga M. Hubard The Journal of Aesthetic Education, Volume 49, Number 2, Summer 2015, pp. 82-98 (Article) Published by University of Illinois Press For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/582500 Access provided by Columbia University (4 Jun 2017 14:33 GMT) “How Does This Artwork Make You Feel?” A “No-No” Question in Art Museum Education? OLGA M. HUBARD “Never ask students how an artwork makes them feel. If the work makes them feel happy, or sad, or whatever, that’s fine, but it’s not our concern as educators.” This is advice I received years ago when I became a museum educator and was learning to facilitate group dialogues about works of art. Group dialogues have become central to art museum education over the last two decades. Distinct from traditional lectures, these dialogues involve extended viewing sessions where, guided by an educator, visitors observe individual artworks closely, share insights and impressions, and ultimately make meaning of the works for themselves.1 “What we care about as educators is how spectators are learning to think,” my instructor added, “not about their emotions, which are subjective.” My instructor suggested that, instead of asking spectators how works of art made them feel, educators should ask, “What emotion does this artwork suggest?” followed by, “What do you see that makes you say that?” These questions, she explained, would shift the focus away from the viewers’ subjective emotional states and direct them toward the objective traits of the artwork.
    [Show full text]
  • How Music Makes Us Feel
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Philosophy Theses Department of Philosophy 8-7-2012 How Music Makes Us Feel Alexander Economides Georgia State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/philosophy_theses Recommended Citation Economides, Alexander, "How Music Makes Us Feel." Thesis, Georgia State University, 2012. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/philosophy_theses/106 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Philosophy at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Philosophy Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HOW MUSIC MAKES US FEEL by ALEXANDER ECONOMIDES Under the Direction of Andrea Scarantino ABSTRACT According to folk psychology, instrumental music regularly elicits emotions in listeners. Philos- ophers and psychologists such as Kivy, Konecni and Zangwill have questioned the existence of these musically elicited emotions, arguing that instrumental music elicits moods or aesthetic judgments rather than emotions. I defend the folk psychological position against these skeptics. The first chapter sets up the debate surrounding musically elicited emotions, while chapters two and three defend the thesis that instrumental music elicits emotions against the critics’ argu- ments. Chapter four outlines the implications of this defense for a variety of fields. INDEX WORDS: Emotion, Affect, Mood, Cognitivism,
    [Show full text]
  • Explicating Emotions
    EXPLICATING EMOTIONS by Andrea Scarantino B.S., Economics, Bocconi University, 1994 M.S., Philosophy of the Social Sciences, London School of Economics and Political Science, 1997 Ph.D., Economics, Universita’ Cattolica, 2000 M.A., Philosophy, University of Pittsburgh, 2005 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of University of Pittsburgh in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2005 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH FACULTY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by Andrea Scarantino It was defended on July 20, 2005 and approved by Paul Griffiths, ARC Federation Fellow and Professor of Philosophy, Department of Philosophy, University of Queensland (Co-Director) Peter Machamer, Professor of Philosophy, Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh (Co-Director) Bob Brandom, Distinguished Service Professor of Philosophy, Department of Philosophy, University of Pittsburgh Ruth Millikan, Emeritus Professor of Philosophy, Department of Philosophy, University of Connecticut (Outside Reader) ii Copyright © by Andrea Scarantino 2005 iii EXPLICATING EMOTIONS Andrea Scarantino, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2005 In the course of their long intellectual history, emotions have been identified with items as diverse as perceptions of bodily changes (feeling tradition), judgments (cognitivist tradition), behavioral predispositions (behaviorist tradition), biologically based solutions to fundamental life tasks (evolutionary tradition), and culturally specific social artifacts (social constructionist tradition). The first objective of my work is to put some order in the mare magnum of theories of emotions. I taxonomize them into families and explore the historical origin and current credentials of the arguments and intuitions supporting them. I then evaluate the methodology of past and present emotion theory, defending a bleak conclusion: a great many emotion theorists ask “What is an emotion?” without a clear understanding of what counts as getting the answer right.
    [Show full text]
  • On Music's Subtle Expressiveness
    AVANT, Vol. VII, No. 1/2016 ISSN: 2082-6710 avant.edu.pl/en DOI: 10.26913/70102016.0111.0002 On Music’s Subtle Expressiveness Myriam Albor Institute for Philosophical Research, UNAM Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México [email protected] Abstract I suggest that emotions are not the primary affective attitude towards music. If we are to explain music’s expressiveness according to the Resemblance Theory, that theory should be extended to include feelings. Because of the lack of intentionality in music and the dearth of universal emotional gestures to explain the subtlety of music’s expressive power, explaining this expressiveness by making recourse to music’s relationships with emotions is bound to face challenges. I will argue that, even though the movements in music asso- ciated with musical expressiveness might not necessarily be associated with emotions, they might very well be associated with certain feelings of the movement itself. Keywords: emotions; expressive qualities; feelings; music’s subtle gestures; musical ex⁠pressiveness; musical gestures; Resemblance Theory. In his seminal book On the Musically Beautiful, Eduard Hanslick claimed that emotions1 are not the content of music. Even though I want to argue in favor of musical expressive- ness, I consider that the grounds Hanslick used to argue against the relationship between emotions and music are quite accurate. Letus start by reviewing them. Hanslick considered that emotions are not only dependent upon physiological conditions, but also upon ideas, judgments, and rational thought. Emotions are thus intelligible. His account is consistent with what became known as a “cognitive approach” to the analysis of emotions, and what is highlighted by such an account is the fact that emotions are in- tentional.
    [Show full text]
  • Art and Emotion: the Variety of Aesthetic Emotions and Their Internal Dynamics
    Interdisciplinary Studies in Musicology 20, 2020 @PTPN Poznań 2020, DOI 10.14746/ism.2020.20.5 Piotr PrzybYSZ https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8184-3656 Faculty of Philosophy, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań Art and Emotion: the variety of Aesthetic Emotions and their Internal Dynamics AbSTRACT: The aim of this paper is to propose an interpretation of aesthetic emotions in which they are treated as various affective reactions to a work of art. I present arguments that there are three different types of such aesthetic emotional responses to art, i.e., embodied emotions, epistemic emotions and contextual-associative emotions. I then argue that aesthetic emotions understood in this way are dynamic wholes that need to be explained by capturing and describing their internal temporal dynamics as well as by analyzing the relationships with the other components of aesthetic experience. Keywords: aesthetic emotions, aesthetic experience, art, music, neuroaesthetics Introduction There is no doubt that music, as well as other genres of art such as painting, is a reliable means of eliciting various emotional reactions. Exposure to a song or painting may result in feelings such as being touched or elated. beha- vioral reactions such as chills or tears may also appear in reaction to the work of art. In other situations, music or painting may serve to calm someone or can be used to improve one’s mood. Despite the unquestionable ability of art to evoke emotions, this ability is still not properly understood, and philosophers and re- searchers are constantly trying to explain it. The tradition of speculative inquiry and empirical studies concerning aes- thetic emotions is, naturally, very long.
    [Show full text]