Costs and Benefits of a United Kingdom Exit from the European Union

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Costs and Benefits of a United Kingdom Exit from the European Union Costs and benefits of a United Kingdom exit from the European Union Costs and benefits of a United Kingdom exit from the European Union April 2015 STUDY commissioned by the Bertelsmann Stiftung Term: March 1, 2015 through April 15, 2015 Final report on April 15, 2015 Rahel Aichele Gabriel Felbermayr Center for International Economics Poschingerstr. 5, 81679 Munich Table of contents 1. Introduction 5 2. Historical summary: From Winston Churchill’s “United States of Europe” in 1946 to Nigel Farage’s UKIP today 9 3. The United Kingdom’s economic relationships with the EU over time 13 3.1. Trade relations 17 3.2. Foreign direct investments 24 3.3. Migration 28 4. Net contribution and UK rebate: How much does the UK actually pay? 32 5. Scenario calculations: What costs could a Brexit create for the UK? Static effects 37 5.1. Scenarios 37 5.2. Estimating the effects on trade, sectoral net value added, openness and real income 38 5.3. Static net effects: a cost-benefit analysis of the EU exit 43 6. What costs would Germany and the EU be facing? Static analysis 45 7. Dynamic effects 49 7.1. Dynamic effects of trade (de)integration for the UK and Germany 49 7.2. Effects through limiting the free movement of people 51 7.3. Estimating the maximum damage of a Brexit 53 7.4. Comparison with other studies 55 8. Closing comments and solution options 57 Bibliography 59 2 Figures and tables Figure 1 United Kingdom’s per capita income relative to Germany (GER) and France (FRA) over time (purchasing power parities) ........................................ 10 Figure 2 Economic trends in the UK, Germany and EU, 1960-2013 (growth rates of the GDP per capita in %) .............................................................................. 13 Figure 3 Economic trends in Germany and the UK, Q1 2010-Q4 2014 (growth rates of the nominal GDP) ................................................................................ 14 Figure 4 Long-term interest rates for 10-year bonds, 2010-2015 ..................... 15 Figure 5 Comparison of inflation rates in the UK and Germany, 1996-2014 .... 16 Figure 6 Government debt in the UK and Germany, 2002-2013 ...................... 17 Figure 7 Percentage of British exports and imports to and from the EU over time (in %) ................................................................................................................ 18 Figure 8 Top 10 export destinations (%) UK, 2012 ........................................... 19 Figure 9 Top 10 import sources (%) UK, 2012 ................................................. 20 Figure 10 EU and total FDI stock in the UK ...................................................... 25 Figure 11 Countries of origin for EU27 FDI stock in the UK (in USD millions), 2012 ......................................................................................................................... 26 Figure 12 UK FDI stock in other EU countries and worldwide .......................... 27 Figure 13 Target countries within the EU27 for UK FDI stock (in USD millions), 2012 ................................................................................................................. 28 Figure 14 Foreign population growth in the UK ................................................ 29 Figure 15 EU citizens in the UK (in thousands), 2011 ...................................... 30 Figure 16 UK citizens who live in other EU countries (in thousands), 2009 ..... 31 Figure 17 The United Kingdom’s net financing contribution to the EU budget . 35 Figure 18 Influence of a Brexit on sectoral value added in the UK ................... 43 Figure 19 Influence of a Brexit on sectoral value added in Germany ............... 46 Figure 20 Influence of a Brexit on sectoral value added in Ireland ................... 47 Figure 21 Development of per capita income in the UK and in a synthetic control group before and after the United Kingdom joined the EU ............................... 54 Table 1 Top 20 UK exports to the EU, 2012 21 Table 2 Top 20 UK imports from the EU, 2012 22 Table 3 Top 20 UK exports to Germany, 2012 23 Table 4 Top 20 UK imports from Germany, 2012 24 Table 5 2013 EU budget, gross and net contributions and how they may change due to a Brexit 33 3 Table 6 Costs of a Brexit, different scenarios 40 Table 7 Changes in the UK’s income per capita through reduced trade openness, static + dynamic effects, long term 50 Table 8 Changes in Germany’s income per capita through reduced trade openness, static + dynamic effects, long term 51 Table 9 Changes in the UK’s income per capita through limiting the free movement of people, static + dynamic effects, long term 53 4 1. Introduction “You can’t have your cake and eat it, too.” (famous English saying first documented in a letter from Duke Thomas of Norfolk to Thomas Cromwell dated 1538.1) Or maybe you can? Is it possible to take part in the economic advantages of the European project without having to bear the associated political costs of relinquishing sovereignty? Proponents of the United Kingdom leaving the European Union – the Brexit (“British Exit”) – believe that the answer to this question is yes.2 Opponents see economic unification above all as a means for creating a political community in Europe. And many pragmatists think that true, deep economic integration without a minimum of common political institutions is impossible. Therefore, the idea of gaining economic advantages without sacrificing a certain amount of political leeway is simply fiction. You can’t have your cake and eat it, too. We can’t have both things at the same time - the benefits of deep economic integration and complete political flexibility. The debate about the United Kingdom’s (UK) role in Europe has been marked by this fundamental tension since the beginning. After World War II the country preferred a free trade zone rather than a customs union, which would enable the UK to have flexibility in handling its special relations with its colonies and the USA and could function without establishing common institutions. When the United Kingdom finally joined the European Community in 1973, the course had already been largely set – and the country has been at odds with its fate ever since. The election results for the UK’s House of Commons from May 7, 2015 will be crucial for deciding whether the country remains in the EU. Having been reelected Prime Minister David Cameron, promised his electorate, he will hold a referendum on the Brexit in 2017 to decide whether the country is in or out. Prior to that, conditions for the United Kingdom to stay in the EU are slated to be renegotiated. The discussion about the Brexit is about the future of Europe, because many other EU member states are having similar discussions, although to a less extreme degree. However the potential referendum should turn out and however the other EU members may react 1 British History Online. See also http://www.todayifoundout.com/index.php/2014/01/cake-eat/. 2 The term, “Brexit,” is misleading in that Britain or Great Britain would not be exiting the EU, but rather the United Kingdom, which includes England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. The geographical term “British Isles” also encompasses Ireland, which is not debating whether to leave the EU. 5 to a Brexit, the case will set a precedent that will significantly influence how the EU continues to develop. What would happen in the event of a Brexit? Since the Treaty of Lisbon in 2009, countries have the opportunity to freely and unilaterally exit the EU.3 But how a country’s relationships with the remaining EU member states would be handled after an exit, and how common policy areas – especially trade policy – should be returned to the national level would need to be negotiated on an individual basis after the intent to exit is announced. The economic costs arising from a Brexit depend heavily on these details. Can the country reach a new bilateral free trade agreement after exiting that would guarantee non-discriminatory access to the goods and services markets of EU members? How would the freedom of labor markets and capital markets be handled? Since the EU negotiates international trade agreements on behalf of its members, the approximately 40 existing bilateral agreements would no longer apply to the United Kingdom should it withdraw from the Union. How well and how quickly could the country successfully replace these agreements? Obviously a great deal depends on the goodwill of the remaining EU members and their trade partners. It is nearly impossible to anticipate what would happen since all EU member states have veto powers. As such, the costs stemming from a Brexit cannot be predicted with great reliability. However, it is certainly clear that a Brexit would have substantial effects on the United Kingdom and other EU nations because the UK’s economic interdependence with other EU member states is significant: 1. The United Kingdom’s trade continues to focus very heavily on the EU: More than 50% of its exports go to the EU, and more than 50% of imports come from other EU nations. In the mid-1960s, these percentages were significantly less than 40%. 2. More than half of the foreign direct investments in the UK come from the EU. This percentage has remained relatively stable in recent years. However, the absolute investment volumes have more than tripled since the beginning of the millennium. 3. A little over 2 million citizens from other EU member states live in the United Kingdom. Just over 1 million of those come from the new member states, primarily Poland, but Ireland and Italy as well. Around 1 million UK citizens live in other EU countries, predominantly in Spain, France and Ireland. Even though predictions are impossible, we can at least say something about the structure of expected effects arising from a Brexit and their magnitude. This study aims to quantify 3 EU Treaty, Art. 50(1) “Any Member State may decide to withdraw from the Union in accordance with its own constitutional requirements.” 6 the economic costs of a Brexit primarily using scenario calculations – thought experiments on the computer that simulate the effects under different conditions to gain new insights.
Recommended publications
  • The Best of the British Isles VIPP July 29
    The Best of the British Isles VIPP (England, Scotland, Ireland & Wales! July 29 - Aug. 12, 2022 (14 nights ) on the ISLAND PRINCESS Pauls’ Top Ten List: (Top 10 reasons this vacation is for you! ) 10. You’ll visit 10 ports of call in 4 countries- England, Scotland, Wales & Ireland 9. You & your luggage don’t have to be on a tour bus at 6 a.m each day! 8. You’ll have a lot of fun- Tom & Rita Paul are personally escorting this trip! 7. You & your luggage don’t have to be on a tour bus at 6 a.m each day!! 6. At least 36 meals are included - more, if you work at it! 5. You & your luggage don’t have to be on a tour bus at 6 a.m each day!!! 4. Texas is too hot in August to stay here! 3. You & your luggage don’t have to be on a tour bus at 6 a.m each day!!!! 2. You deserve to see the British Isles (maybe for the second time) in sheer luxury! # 1 reason: You & your luggage don’t have to be on a tour bus at 6 a.m each day!!!!! So, join us! Just think-no nightly hotels, packing & unpacking, we’re going on a real vacation! New ports too! We sail from London (Southampton) to GUERNSEY (St. Peter Port), England- a lush, green island situated near France. CORK (Ireland) allows a chance to “kiss the Blarney stone” as well as enjoy the scenic countryside and villages! On to HOLYHEAD (Wales) then BELFAST (N.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Union: Where Is It Now?
    Duquesne Law Review Volume 34 Number 4 Conference Proceedings: The Duquesne University School of Law Instititue for Judicial Education's and the Supreme Court of Article 9 Pennsylvania Conference on Science and the Law 1996 The European Union: Where Is It Now? John P. Flaherty Maureen E. Lally-Green Follow this and additional works at: https://dsc.duq.edu/dlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation John P. Flaherty & Maureen E. Lally-Green, The European Union: Where Is It Now?, 34 Duq. L. Rev. 923 (1996). Available at: https://dsc.duq.edu/dlr/vol34/iss4/9 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Duquesne Scholarship Collection. It has been accepted for inclusion in Duquesne Law Review by an authorized editor of Duquesne Scholarship Collection. The European Union: Where is it Now? Hon. John P. Flaherty* Maureen E. Lally-Green** TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .............................. 926 Part One: A Brief History Lesson .............. 927 A. The Late 1940's through 1958 ............. 928 1. General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GAAT) (1947) ..................... 928 2. Benelux Customs Convention (1948) ...... 928 3. Council of Europe (1948) ............... 929 4. Organization for European Economic Cooperation (OEEC) (1948) ............ 930 * BA Duquesne University; J.D. University of Pittsburgh; Justice, the Su- preme Court of Pennsylvania (to be elevated to the position of Chief Justice of Penn- sylvania, July 1996). ** B.S. Duquesne University; J.D. Duquesne University; Professor of Law, Duquesne University School of Law. Both authors have been instrumental in the development of an academic pro- gram between the Duquesne University School of Law and the Law School of Uni- versity College Dublin in Dublin, Ireland on the topic of the law of the European Union.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genetic Landscape of Scotland and the Isles
    The genetic landscape of Scotland and the Isles Edmund Gilberta,b, Seamus O’Reillyc, Michael Merriganc, Darren McGettiganc, Veronique Vitartd, Peter K. Joshie, David W. Clarke, Harry Campbelle, Caroline Haywardd, Susan M. Ringf,g, Jean Goldingh, Stephanie Goodfellowi, Pau Navarrod, Shona M. Kerrd, Carmen Amadord, Archie Campbellj, Chris S. Haleyd,k, David J. Porteousj, Gianpiero L. Cavalleria,b,1, and James F. Wilsond,e,1,2 aSchool of Pharmacy and Molecular and Cellular Therapeutics, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin D02 YN77, Ireland; bFutureNeuro Research Centre, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin D02 YN77, Ireland; cGenealogical Society of Ireland, Dún Laoghaire, Co. Dublin A96 AD76, Ireland; dMedical Research Council Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, Scotland; eCentre for Global Health Research, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, Scotland; fBristol Bioresource Laboratories, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2BN, United Kingdom; gMedical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2BN, United Kingdom; hCentre for Academic Child Health, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1NU, United Kingdom; iPrivate address, Isle of Man IM7 2EA, Isle of Man; jCentre for Genomic and Experimental Medicine, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University
    [Show full text]
  • The Historical Development of European Integration
    FACT SHEETS ON THE EUROPEAN UNION The historical development of European integration PE 618.969 1. The First Treaties.....................................................................................................3 2. Developments up to the Single European Act.........................................................6 3. The Maastricht and Amsterdam Treaties...............................................................10 4. The Treaty of Nice and the Convention on the Future of Europe..........................14 5. The Treaty of Lisbon..............................................................................................18 EN - 18/06/2018 ABOUT THE PUBLICATION This leaflet contains a compilation of Fact Sheets provided by Parliament’s Policy Departments and Economic Governance Support Unit on the relevant policy area. The Fact Sheets are updated regularly and published on the website of the European Parliament: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/factsheets ABOUT THE PUBLISHER Author of the publication: European Parliament Department responsible: Unit for Coordination of Editorial and Communication Activities E-mail: [email protected] Manuscript completed in June, 2018 © European Union, 2018 DISCLAIMER The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the publisher is given prior notice
    [Show full text]
  • Sub-National Regionalism and the European Union
    Sub-National Regionalism and the European Union Roman Szul ABSTRACT The article discusses the relationship between sub-national regionalism and the European Union. Specific attention is paid to the influence of EU accession on regionalism and regionalisation in Poland, especially the situation of the Mazovian Region. It is argued that the relationship between sub-national regionalism and the European Union (as a form of European integration) is determined by four factors: firstly, the decrease of the traditional role of nation state after the second world war and redefinition of international (interstate) relations which made more space both for European integration and regionalism; secondly, practical activities of the EU, especially its funds for regional develop- ment, which prompted or encouraged some countries, especially the new members states from central-eastern Europe, to create regions and stimulated regionalism; thirdly, the recent austerity policy prescribed by the EU in some countries, especially in Spain, which stimulates radicalism of regionalist movements (the case of Catalonia); fourthly, the very ex- istence of the EU and the need to negotiate EU membership which discourages those regionalist-nationalist movements which aim to separate their regions from the existing EU member states while remaining in the EU. Introductory comments The purpose of this paper is to analyse relationships between “sub-national” regionalism and the European Union. The adjective “sub-national” is used to distinguish two completely different meanings of the word “regionalism”: one relating to regions understood as parts of the existing nation states1 and the other (supra-national regionalism) relating to regions as parts of the world and consisting of integration of countries belonging to the same world region2.
    [Show full text]
  • FOREWORD It Is an Honour for Me to Present This Compendium Which
    FOREWORD FOREWORD It is an honour for me to present this compendium which includes papers, practical information and proposals for combating fraud and corruption based on experience of the Supreme Audit Institutions (SAIs) in Central, Eastern Europe and Asia. The book was prepared upon the results of the EUROSAI International Conference “The Role of Supreme Audit Institutions in Fighting Against Fraud and Corruption” hosted by the Accounting Chamber of Ukraine on September 1921, 2006 in Kyiv. The EUROSAI event was attended by 61 participants from 24 SAIs among which were present Presidents of 16 SAIs. The participants discussed the following subthemes: • Subtheme I: The Role of SAIs in the National System Development of Fighting Against Fraud and Corruption; • Subtheme II: Peculiarities of SAIs Cooperation with the Law Enforcement Bodies during Exposure and Prevention of Fraud and Corruption; • Subtheme III: The Practice of SAIs in Implementation Transparency and Publicity in the Field of Fighting Against Fraud and Corruption. The Conference was supported by the Parliament of Ukraine, the Cabinet of Ministries of Ukraine and by the number of Ukrainian government authorities which participated in this event. I would like to pass special thanks to all of my colleagues, Heads of the SAIs for their interest in the Conference and willingness to share experience and modern techniques in fighting against fraud and corruption. I am very pleased that the initiative of the Accounting Chamber of Ukraine received great feedback among the EUROSAI community. I am deeply convinced that this event stimulated and consolidated efficient collaboration between SAIs and that approved Recommendations will further facilitate applying common actions towards combating such negative phenomena as fraud and corruption.
    [Show full text]
  • Do You Know the British Isles?
    Download (GL 2, U 6, pp. 108–109) 3339a2 U 6 Do you know the British Isles? 1 Parts of the British Isles Fill in the boxes and draw the fl ags of the different parts of the British Isles. SE36834220_British_Isles_GL2.pdfSE36834220_British_Isles_GL2.pdf 1 10.02.2016 1 10.02.2016 10:04:15 10:04:15 O R K N E YO R K N E Y I S L A N D SI S L A N D S 7 THETHE BRITISH BRITISH ISLES ISLES 0 0 100 100 200 200 300 km300 km O U T E R O U T E R H E B R I D E S H E B R I D E S 0 100 EnglandEngland ScotlandScotlandNorthernNorthern Ireland Ireland 0 100 200 miles200 miles s s d d n n InvernessInverness a a l 14 l h h 8 g g Loch Ness AberdeenAberdeen i Loch Ness i H “Union“ JackUnion” Jack” H Ben NevisBen Nevis Firth of Firth of Scotland Forth Forth EdinburghEdinburgh GlasgowGlasgow Northern Ireland 16 EdinburghEdinburgh Castle Castle Hadrian’sHadrian’s 11 NewcastleNewcastle Wall Tyne Giant’s Giant’s Wall Tyne CausewayCauseway Lake Lake BelfastBelfast DistrictDistrict P P e e 12 n I S L E I S L E n n O F O F n i i York York M A N M A N n n e e s s Hull Hull AtlanticAtlantic Ocean Ocean Irish IrishSea Sea 4 6 Humber Humber Galway Galway LiverpoolLiverpool ManchesterManchester DublinDublin 1 Nottingham The SnowdonSnowdon Nottingham The Wash Wash s 9 s Trent Trent n n i i a a t t n n u u o o BirminghamBirmingham Severn Severn M M CambridgeCambridge n 15 St.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is European Integration Really About? a Political Guide for Economists
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES WHAT IS EUROPEAN INTEGRATION REALLY ABOUT? A POLITICAL GUIDE FOR ECONOMISTS Enrico Spolaore Working Paper 19122 http://www.nber.org/papers/w19122 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 June 2013 I am grateful to Jeff Frieden, Yannis Ioannides, Deborah Menegotto, Stelios Michalopoulos, Romain Wacziarg, and the editors of the Journal of Economic Perspectives (David Autor, Chang-Tai Hseih, and Tim Taylor) for their detailed comments. I also benefited from helpful feedback and conversations with many people, including Lorenzo Bini-Smaghi, Giancarlo Corsetti, Henrik Enderlein, Kai Konrad, Athanasios Orphanides, Lucas Papademos, and Daniela Schwarzer, and participants in the political economy discussion group at Harvard and a conference at the Condorcet Center for Political Economy in Rennes. Of course I am the only one responsible for all opinions and errors in this paper. The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer- reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2013 by Enrico Spolaore. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. What is European Integration Really About? A Political Guide for Economists Enrico Spolaore NBER Working Paper No. 19122 June 2013 JEL No. F15,F50,F55,H40,H77,N44 ABSTRACT Europe’s monetary union is part of a broader process of integration that started in the aftermath of World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • Dinner at Jefferson's 07Th July 2020 (Or How the US Created the Federal Public Debt)
    POLICY POLICY PAPERPAPER European issues n°566 Dinner at Jefferson's 07th July 2020 (or how the US created the federal public debt) Jean-Guy GIRAUD As negotiations on the European Union's future economic recovery plan continue, many references are being made to Europe's "Hamiltonian moment". For the first time, the European Union could supplement its budgetary resources with funds raised on the capital markets to finance grants and loans to countries affected by the crisis. Jean Guy Giraud returns in this text to the 1790 agreement between Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson on public borrowing, which helped transform the United States into a true political federation. The text contains an introductory statement by Alain Lamassoure. Introductory words States acquired a single currency comparable to the euro, a real Central Bank, a standing army embryo and FROM WASHINGTON TO BRUSSELS? a federal budget capable of having a macro-economic effect. In the meantime, the conditions of temperature From day one, the constitutional history of the United and pressure that made it possible to move towards a States of America has fascinated the promoters truly complete federation had been met: a twenty-fold of European unity. From Victor Hugo to Winston increase in population, the conquest of the West, the Churchill, via Altiero Spinelli imprisoned in Ventotene, industrial revolution and the dreadful Civil War, from which the formula of the "United States of Europe" had the American Union never fully recovered. become commonplace long before Robert Schuman's And yet, there are sometimes striking similarities in these founding speech.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Download a History of the British Isles Prehistory to the Present 1St Edition Pdf Free Download
    A HISTORY OF THE BRITISH ISLES PREHISTORY TO THE PRESENT 1ST EDITION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Kenneth L Campbell | 9781474216678 | | | | | A History of the British Isles Prehistory to the Present 1st edition PDF Book About two to four millennia later, Great Britain became separated from the mainland. Perhaps the most prestigious megalithic monument of Europe is Stonehenge, the stone circle presiding on the rolling hills of Salisbury in Wiltshire, England. The earliest known references to the islands as a group appeared in the writings of seafarers from the ancient Greek colony of Massalia. In: English Heritage. We are independent, we are not part of Britain, not even in geographical terms. In time, Anglo-Saxon demands on the British became so great that they came to culturally dominate the bulk of southern Great Britain, though recent genetic evidence suggests Britons still formed the bulk of the population. English colonialism in Ireland of the 16th century was extended by large-scale Scottish and English colonies in Ulster. Allen, Stephen Lehmberg Request examination copy. However, the terms were never honoured and a new monarchy was installed. Reports on its findings are presented to the Governments of Ireland and the United Kingdom. Section 2 Greek text and English translation at the Perseus Project. The Red Lady of Paviland. The Britons. Request examination copy. In one section, the author explains that the geographic mobility traditionally considered one of the consequences of the 14th- century Black Death actually had begun before the outbreak of the epidemic, as had political discontent among the population, also traditionally attributed to the plague's aftermath.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 May Veliko Tarnovo 4Th CSDP Olympiad Booklet.Pdf
    4th COMMON SECURITY AND DEFENCE POLICY OLYMPIAD Residential phase, 21 - 25 May 2018 at Vasil Levski NMU, Veliko Tarnovo, under the auspices of the Bulgarian Presidency of the Council of the European Union and the European Security and Defence College, Brussels, Belgium Publication of the Vasil Levski National Military University Editor: Colonel Prof. Dr. Veselin MADANSKI, Colonel Assoc. Prof. Nevena ATANASOVA - KRASTEVA, PhD Language Editor: Senior Instructor Marina RAYKOVA Disclaimer: Any views or opinions presented in this booklet are solely those of the authors. © Vasil Levski National Military University, Veliko Tarnovo, BULGARIA, 2018 ISBN 978-954-753-278-6 2 CONTENTS Table of Contents .......................................................................................................... 3 History of the CSDP Olympiad ................................................................................ 5 History of the Vasil Levski NMU, Veliko Tarnovo ........................................... 8 OPENING CEREMONY SPEECHES ....................................................................... 10 Speech of the Deputy-Minister of the Bulgarian Presidency of the EU Council ................................................................................................................ 10 CSDP Olympiad 2018 – Speech of the Chairman of the IG .......................... 13 Speech of the Head of the ESDC ............................................................................. 15 Speech of the Minister of Defence ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Is Situated on the British Isles
    Дата: 15.10.2020 Группа: 102Фк Специальность: Лечебное дело Тема: The United Kingdom. England. Scotland. Задание лекции: перевести слова под текстом. Домашнее задание – найти: 1) Столицы стран Великобритании 2) Символы стран Великобритании 3) Флаги стран Великобритании 4) Национальные блюда стран Великобритании The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland is situated on the British Isles. The British Isles consist of two large islands, Great Britain and Ireland, and about five thousands small islands. Their total area is over 244 000 square kilometres. The United ingdom is one o! the world"s smaller #ountries. Its population is over $% million. &bout '0 (er#ent o! the (o(ulation is urban. The United ingdom is made up of !our #ountries) *ngland, +ales, ,#otland and -orthern Ireland. Their #a(itals are .ondon, /ardi0, *dinburgh and Bel!ast res(e#tivel1. Great Britain #onsists o! *ngland, ,#otland and +ales and does not include -orthern Ireland. But in everyday s(ee#h 2Great Britain» is used in the meaning o! the 2United ingdom o! Great Britain and -orthern Ireland3. The #a(ital o! the U is .ondon. The British Isles are separated from the /ontinent by the -orth ,ea, the *nglish /hannel and the ,trait o! 4over. The western #oast o! Great Britain is washed by the &tlanti# 5#ean and the Irish ,ea. The surface o! the British Isles varies very mu#h. The north o! ,#otland is mountainous and is #alled 6ighlands. The south, whi#h has beauti!ul valleys and plains, is #alled .owlands. The north and west o! *ngland are mountainous, but the eastern, #entral and south-eastern (arts o! *ngland are a vast (lain.
    [Show full text]