City of Los Angeles Elysian Park Water Recycling Project Phase 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

City of Los Angeles Elysian Park Water Recycling Project Phase 1 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT for the City of Los Angeles Elysian Park Water Recycling Project Phase 1 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 9 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, California 94105 April 2014 Page intentionally left blank Environmental Assessment Elysian Park Water Recycling Project Los Angeles County TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1 Purpose and Need for Action ........................................................ 1-1 1.1 Introduction ........................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Legal Framework .................................................................. 1-3 1.3 Project Location .................................................................... 1-3 1.4 Purpose and Need for Proposed Action ................................ 1-3 1.5 Scope of Environmental Information Document .................... 1-4 Section 2 Description of the Proposed Action and Alternatives ................. 2-1 2.1 Alternatives Evaluated .......................................................... 2-1 2.2 Alternative 1: (Preferred Alternative) Recycled and Potable Water Pipelines, Pumping Stations, and Tanks ........ 2-1 2.3 Alternative 2: HDD Alternative .............................................. 2-3 2.4 Alternative 3: No Action Alternative ....................................... 2-4 2.5 Identification of the Preferred Alternative .............................. 2-4 2.6 Alternatives Considered and Eliminated ............................... 2-4 Section 3 Affected Environment .................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Air Quality ............................................................................. 3-1 3.2 Noise .................................................................................... 3-3 3.3 Odor ..................................................................................... 3-3 3.4 Water Resources .................................................................. 3-3 3.5 Wetlands............................................................................... 3-4 3.6 Floodplains ........................................................................... 3-4 3.7 Public Health and Safety ....................................................... 3-4 3.8 Surface Resources ............................................................... 3-5 3.9 Vegetation and Wildlife ......................................................... 3-6 3.10 Threatened and Endangered Species ................................... 3-8 3.11 Cultural Resources and Historic Property ............................. 3-8 3.12 Land Use and Infrastructure.................................................. 3-9 3.13 Aesthetics ........................................................................... 3-10 3.14 Socioeconomics.................................................................. 3-10 3.15 Waste Management ............................................................ 3-11 3.16 Transportation .................................................................... 3-11 3.17 Energy ................................................................................ 3-11 3.18 Environmental Justice and Protection of Children ............... 3-11 Section 4 Environmental Consequences ...................................................... 4-1 4.1 Air Quality ............................................................................. 4-1 4.2 Noise .................................................................................... 4-2 4.3 Odor ..................................................................................... 4-8 4.4 Water Resources .................................................................. 4-8 4.5 Wetlands............................................................................. 4-10 4.6 Floodplains ......................................................................... 4-10 4.7 Public Health and Safety ..................................................... 4-11 4.8 Surface Resources ............................................................. 4-12 4.9 Vegetation and Wildlife ....................................................... 4-14 4.10 Threatened and Endangered Species ................................. 4-15 April 2014 Page i Table of Contents 4.11 Cultural Resources and Historic Property ............................ 4-16 4.12 Land Use and Infrastructure ................................................ 4-19 4.13 Aesthetics ............................................................................ 4-20 4.14 Socioeconomics .................................................................. 4-22 4.15 Waste Management ............................................................ 4-22 4.16 Transportation ..................................................................... 4-24 4.17 Energy ................................................................................. 4-26 4.18 Environmental Justice and Protection of Children ................ 4-26 4.19 Cumulative Impacts ............................................................. 4-27 4.20 Selection of the Preferred Alternative .................................. 4-27 4.21 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts ............................................. 4-34 4.22 Relationship of Short-Term and Long-Term Productivity ...... 4-34 4.23 Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitments ......................... 4-34 4.24 Conclusion........................................................................... 4-35 Section 5 References.......................................................................................5-1 Section 6 List of Preparers .............................................................................6-1 List of Figures Figure 1 Regional Location Map .....................................................................1-5 Figure 2 Proposed Action ................................................................................1-6 List of Tables Table 3-1 National Ambient Air Quality Standards and Attainment Status for the South Coast Air Basin ...............................3-1 Table 3-2 Federal De Minimis Levels ................................................................3-2 Table 3-3 Existing Noise Levels ........................................................................3-3 Table 3-4 Minority Population Statistics for Los Angeles County and the State of California ................................................... 3-12 Table 4-1 Annual Construction Emissions for General Conformity - Proposed Action.............................................................................4-1 Table 4-2 Annual Greenhouse Gas Emissions – Proposed Action ....................4-2 Table 4-3 Annual Construction Emissions for General Conformity - HDD Alternative ................................................................................4-2 Table 4-4 Annual Greenhouse Gas Emissions – HDD Alternative ....................4-3 Table 4-5 Summary of Impacts for Evaluated Resources ................................ 4-28 TECHNICAL APPENDICES Appendix A Biological Reconnaissance Survey Report Appendix B Cultural Resources Assessment Appendix C Air Quality Report Appendix D Traffic Report Page ii Environmental Assessment Elysian Park Water Recycling Project Los Angeles County April 2014 Page iii Table of Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations AFY acre-feet per year APE Area of Potential Effect AQMP Air Quality Management Plan CAA Clean Air Act Caltrans California Department of Transportation CDFG California Department of Fish and Game CH4 methane CHL California Historic Landmark CO carbon monoxide CO2 carbon dioxide CO2e carbon dioxide equivalent DBA a-weighted decibel DTSC Department of Toxic Substances Control EID Environmental Information Document EIR Environmental Impact Report EO Executive Order GHG greenhouse gas emissions GPM gallons per minute I-5 Interstate 5, Golden State Freeway I-10 Interstate 10, Santa Monica Freeway IS/MND Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration LAA Los Angeles Aqueduct LADOT Los Angeles Department of Transportation LADWP Los Angeles Department of Water and Power LAHCM Los Angeles Historic-Cultural Monument LARAP City of Los Angeles Department of Recreation and Parks Leq community noise equivalent level MOU memorandum of understanding MG million gallons MWD Metropolitan Water District N2O nitrous oxide NAHC Native American Heritage Commission NO2 nitrogen dioxide NOx nitrogen oxide NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards NEPA National Environmental Policy Act O3 ozone Pb lead PM2.5 particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter PM10 particulate matter 10 microns in diameter or less SCAG Southern California Association of Governments SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District SO2 sulfur dioxide SOx sulfur oxide SR 110 State Route 110, Pasadena Freeway SWPPP Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan TMP Traffic Management Plan Page iv Environmental Assessment Elysian Park Water Recycling Project Los Angeles County US 101 U.S. Highway 101, Hollywood Freeway USACE United States Army Corps of Engineers USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service VOC volatile organic compound WRP water recycling project April 2014 Page v Environmental Information Document for Elysian Park Water Recycling Project Los Angeles County SECTION 1 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION 1.1 Introduction The City of Los Angeles (City) relies on four sources of water to meet its water needs: (1) snow-melt runoff from the Eastern Sierra conveyed by the Los Angeles Aqueduct
Recommended publications
  • Historic-Cultural Monument (HCM) List City Declared Monuments
    Historic-Cultural Monument (HCM) List City Declared Monuments No. Name Address CHC No. CF No. Adopted Community Plan Area CD Notes 1 Leonis Adobe 23537 Calabasas Road 08/06/1962 Canoga Park - Winnetka - 3 Woodland Hills - West Hills 2 Bolton Hall 10116 Commerce Avenue & 7157 08/06/1962 Sunland - Tujunga - Lake View 7 Valmont Street Terrace - Shadow Hills - East La Tuna Canyon 3 Plaza Church 535 North Main Street and 100-110 08/06/1962 Central City 14 La Iglesia de Nuestra Cesar Chavez Avenue Señora la Reina de Los Angeles (The Church of Our Lady the Queen of Angels) 4 Angel's Flight 4th Street & Hill Street 08/06/1962 Central City 14 Dismantled May 1969; Moved to Hill Street between 3rd Street and 4th Street, February 1996 5 The Salt Box 339 South Bunker Hill Avenue (Now 08/06/1962 Central City 14 Moved from 339 Hope Street) South Bunker Hill Avenue (now Hope Street) to Heritage Square; destroyed by fire 1969 6 Bradbury Building 300-310 South Broadway and 216- 09/21/1962 Central City 14 224 West 3rd Street 7 Romulo Pico Adobe (Rancho 10940 North Sepulveda Boulevard 09/21/1962 Mission Hills - Panorama City - 7 Romulo) North Hills 8 Foy House 1335-1341 1/2 Carroll Avenue 09/21/1962 Silver Lake - Echo Park - 1 Elysian Valley 9 Shadow Ranch House 22633 Vanowen Street 11/02/1962 Canoga Park - Winnetka - 12 Woodland Hills - West Hills 10 Eagle Rock Eagle Rock View Drive, North 11/16/1962 Northeast Los Angeles 14 Figueroa (Terminus), 72-77 Patrician Way, and 7650-7694 Scholl Canyon Road 11 The Rochester (West Temple 1012 West Temple Street 01/04/1963 Westlake 1 Demolished February Apartments) 14, 1979 12 Hollyhock House 4800 Hollywood Boulevard 01/04/1963 Hollywood 13 13 Rocha House 2400 Shenandoah Street 01/28/1963 West Adams - Baldwin Hills - 10 Leimert City of Los Angeles May 5, 2021 Page 1 of 60 Department of City Planning No.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Improvements
    REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED RIO HONDO SATELLITE CAMPUS EL RANCHO ADULT SCHOOL 9515 HANEY STREET PICO RIVERA, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: RIO HONDO PROGRAM MANAGEMENT TEAM Whittier, California January 20, 2016 Project 4953-15-0302 January 20, 2016 Mr Luis Rojas Rio Hondo Program Management Team c/o Rio Hondo College 3600 Workman Mill Road Whittier, California 90601-1699 Subject: LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Report of Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Improvements Proposed Rio Hondo Satellite Campus El Rancho Adult School 9515 Haney Street Pico Rivera, California, 90660 Amec Foster Wheeler Project 4953-15-0302 Dear Mr. Rojas: We are pleased to submit the results of our geotechnical investigation for the proposed improvements as part of the proposed Rio Hondo Satellite Campus at the El Rancho Adult School in Pico Rivera, California. This investigation was performed in general accordance with our proposal dated November 24, 2015, which was authorized by e-mail on December 15, 2015. The scope of our services was planned with Mr. Manuel Jaramillo of DelTerra. We have been furnished with a site plan and a general description of the proposed improvements. The results of our investigation and design recommendations are presented in this report. Please note that you or your representative should submit copies of this report to the appropriate governmental agencies for their review and approval prior to obtaining a permit. Correspondence: Amec Foster Wheeler 6001 Rickenbacker Road Los Angeles, California 90040 USA
    [Show full text]
  • An Elusive Blind-Thrust Fault Beneath Metropolitan Los Angeles
    R EPORTS 5 The intercept of the line with the abscissa yields Di/D 1/4, which is an extreme case, differs only by 36. N. A. Sulpice and R. J. D’Arcy, J. Phys. E 3, 477 (1970). 7% as compared with D 5 0. DV. This geometry-independent constant is i 37. Electrical charging due to the electron beam cannot 31. Microscopy was performed with a Philips CM30 200- account for the effect, because the charge found to characteristic for the specific nanotube under kV high-resolution TEM. reside on the nanotubes is positive rather than neg- investigation and is typically on the order of 32. The ripple mode may be a precursor to buckling, but ative. Furthermore, the amplitude of vibration at several volts. Similarly, attaching nanoscopic it should not be confused with bucking. Buckling (in resonance does not change with electron dose, as it contrast to rippling) is characterized as an instability would if electron beam charging were important. conducting particles to the nanotubes facilitates giving rise to a nonlinear response. It occurs in highly 38. M. Gurgoze, J. Sound Vib. 190, 149 (1996). measurements of their work functions. stressed nanotubes (and beams) and manifests as 39. We thank U. Landman, R. L. Whetten, L. Forro, and A. The methods developed here are also well one or several kinks with very small radii of curvature Zangwill for fruitful discussion and R. Nitsche for his suited to measure masses in the picogram-to- (about 1 to 10 nm). It is accompanied by abrupt analysis of the static bent nanotube.
    [Show full text]
  • STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY and TECTONICS DIVISION Newsletter Volume 13, Number 1 March 1994
    STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY and TECTONICS DIVISION Newsletter Volume 13, Number 1 March 1994 CHAIRPERSON'S MESSAGE Division activities at the annual meeting in Boston were quite successful. John Bartley became the new second vice chair, Ed Beutner moved up to first vice-chair and Art Goldstein is the new secretary-treasurer. We all thank the past secretary-treasurer, Don Secor, for keeping the Division running properly during his record tenure of six years. The papers at Division sessions were excellent, so interesting to me that I spent the meeting in these sessions and missed the exhibits. Thanks to Fred Chester and Ron Bruhn for organizing a really cutting-edge symposium on inferring paleoearthquakes from fault-rock fabrics. It appears that this seemingly intractable problem has some solutions. We can expect some significant publications from the speakers. Terry Engelder, with help from Mike Gross and Mark Fischer presented the Division's short course on fracture mechanics of rock. The course was highly praised by everyone I heard from; thanks guys. As always, it was a pleasure to attend the Division's award ceremony to honor the recipients and to hear the citations and responses. As Darrel Cowan, in his citation of Ben Page for the Career Contribution Award, summarized Ben's significant publications, I was intrigued as I realized that my list would have been as long but different. Such a broad range of important contributions is an excellent qualification for this award. Mark Cloos cited Dan Worrall and Sig Snelson for the best paper award for their 1989 DNAG paper "Evolution of the northern Gulf of Mexico, with emphasis on Cenozoic growth faulting and the role of salt." This paper contains important new insights into regional salt tectonics as well as helps highlight a large region of very active tectonics that misses out on being a classic orogenic belt only because it is not forming mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • 3-8 Geologic-Seismic
    Environmental Evaluation 3-8 GEOLOGIC-SEISMIC Changes Since the Draft EIS/EIR Subsequent to the release of the Draft EIS/EIR in April 2004, the Gold Line Phase II project has undergone several updates: Name Change: To avoid confusion expressed about the terminology used in the Draft EIS/EIR (e.g., Phase I; Phase II, Segments 1 and 2), the proposed project is referred to in the Final EIS/EIR as the Gold Line Foothill Extension. Selection of a Locally Preferred Alternative and Updated Project Definition: Following the release of the Draft EIS/EIR, the public comment period, and input from the cities along the alignment, the Construction Authority Board approved a Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) in August 2004. This LPA included the Triple Track Alternative (2 LRT and 1 freight track) that was defined and evaluated in the Draft EIS/EIR, a station in each city, and the location of the Maintenance and Operations Facility. Segment 1 was changed to extend eastward to Azusa. A Project Definition Report (PDR) was prepared to define refined station and parking lot locations, grade crossings and two rail grade separations, and traction power substation locations. The Final EIS/EIR and engineering work that support the Final EIS/EIR are based on the project as identified in the Final PDR (March 2005), with the following modifications. Following the PDR, the Construction Authority Board approved a Revised LPA in June 2005. Between March and August 2005, station options in Arcadia and Claremont were added. Changes in the Discussions: To make the Final EIS/EIR more reader-friendly, the following format and text changes have been made: Discussion of a Transportation Systems Management (TSM) Alternative has been deleted since the LPA decision in August 2004 eliminated it as a potential preferred alternative.
    [Show full text]
  • Journalism Awards
    FIFTIETH FIFTIETHANNUAL 5ANNUAL 0SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA JOURNALISM AWARDS LOS ANGELES PRESS CLUB th 50 Annual Awards for Editorial Southern California Journalism Awards Excellence in 2007 and Los Angeles Press Club A non-profit organization with 501(c)(3) status Tax ID 01-0761875 Honorary Awards 4773 Hollywood Boulevard Los Angeles, California 90027 for 2008 Phone: (323) 669-8081 Fax: (323) 669-8069 Internet: www.lapressclub.org E-mail: [email protected] THE PRESIDENT’S AWARD For Impact on Media PRESS CLUB OFFICERS Steve Lopez PRESIDENT: Chris Woodyard Los Angeles Times USA Today VICE PRESIDENT: Ezra Palmer Editor THE JOSEPH M. QUINN AWARD TREASURER: Anthea Raymond For Journalistic Excellence and Distinction Radio Reporter/Editor Ana Garcia 3 SECRETARY: Jon Beaupre Radio/TV Journalist, Educator Investigative Journalist and TV Anchor EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: Diana Ljungaeus KNBC News International Journalist BOARD MEMBERS THE DANIEL PEARL AWARD Michael Collins, EnviroReporter.com For Courage and Integrity in Journalism Jane Engle, Los Angeles Times Bob Woodruff Jahan Hassan, Ekush (Bengali newspaper) Rory Johnston, Freelance Veteran Correspondent and TV Anchor Will Lewis, KCRW ABC Fred Mamoun, KNBC-4News Jon Regardie, LA Downtown News Jill Stewart, LA Weekly George White, UCLA Adam Wilkenfeld, Independent TV Producer Theresa Adams, Student Representative ADVISORY BOARD Alex Ben Block, Entertainment Historian Patt Morrison, LA Times/KPCC PUBLICIST Edward Headington ADMINISTRATOR Wendy Hughes th 50 Annual Southern California Journalism Awards
    [Show full text]
  • Iv.E Geology
    IV.E GEOLOGY 1.0 INTRODUCTION This section of the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) identifies and evaluates geologic and soils conditions at Loyola Marymount University (LMU) campus that could affect, or be affected by, implementation of the Proposed Project. The information contained in this section is based on a geotechnical evaluation1 prepared by MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc., (MACTEC) prepared in July 2009, which is provided in Appendix IV.E. 2.0 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK 2.1 State and Regional Regulations 2.1.1 Seismic Hazards Mapping Act Under the Seismic Hazards Mapping Act of 1990, the State Geologist is responsible for identifying and mapping seismic hazards zones as part of the California Geological Survey. The Geological Survey provides zoning maps of non-surface rupture earthquake hazards (including liquefaction and seismically induced landslides) to local governments for planning purposes. These maps are intended to protect the public from the risks involved with strong ground shaking, liquefaction, landslides or other ground failure, and other hazards caused by earthquakes. For projects within seismic hazard zones, the Seismic Hazards Mapping Act requires developers to conduct geological investigations and incorporate appropriate mitigation measures into project designs before building permits are issued. Most of the Southern California region has been mapped. Established by the Seismic Safety Commission Act in 1975, the State Seismic Safety Commission’s purpose is to provide oversight, review, and recommendations to the Governor and State Legislature regarding seismic issues. 2.1.2 Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act The Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act (the Act) (Public Resource Code Section 2621.5) of 1972 was enacted in response to the 1971 San Fernando earthquake, which caused extensive surface fault ruptures that damaged numerous homes, commercial buildings, and other structures.
    [Show full text]
  • African American History of Los Angeles
    LOS ANGELES CITYWIDE HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT Context: African American History of Los Angeles Prepared for: City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning Office of Historic Resources NOVEMBER 2017 SurveyLA Citywide Historic Context Statement Context: African American History of Los Angeles Certified Local Government Grant Disclaimers The activity that is the subJect of this historic context statement has been financed in part with Federal funds from the National Park Service, Department of Interior, through the California Office of Historic Preservation. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior or the California Office of Historic Preservation, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation by the Department of the Interior or the California Office of Historic Preservation. This program receives Federal financial assistance for identification and protection of historic properties. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975 as amended, the Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination based on race, color, national origin, disability, or age in its federally assisted programs. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility as described above, or if you desire further information, please write to: Office of Equal Opportunity National Park Service 1849 C Street, N.W. Washington
    [Show full text]
  • GC 1002 Del Valle Family Papers
    GC 1002 Del Valle Family Papers Repository: Seaver Center for Western History Research, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County Span Dates: 1789 – 1929, undated, bulk is 1830 – 1900 Extent: Boxes: 13 legal, 2 ov, 1 mc drawer Language: English and Spanish Abstract: Papers relating to Antonio Seferino del Valle, his son Ygnacio, grandson Reginaldo F., and other family members. Activities include their cattle ranching and wine businesses, particularly in Rancho San Francisco and Rancho Camulos, located in today’s Ventura County, California. Other papers include the political activities of Ygnacio and Reginaldo F. Conditions Governing Use: Permission to publish, quote or reproduce must be secured from the repository and the copyright holder Conditions Governing Access: Research is by appointment only Preferred Citation: Del Valle Family Papers, Seaver Center for Western History Research, Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History Related Holdings: P-14 Del Valle [Photograph] Collection, 1870s – 1900 GC 1001 Antonio F. Coronel (1817 – 1894) Papers P-157 Antonio Franco Coronel (1817 – 1894) Collection, ca. 1850 – 1900 Seaver Center for Western History Research GC 1002 The History Department’s Material Culture Collection Scope and Content: Correspondence, business papers, legal papers, personal and family papers, memoranda, military documents, and material relating to Antonio Seferino del Valle (1788-1841), who came to California in the Spanish army in 1819; of his son Ygnacio, (1808-80), born in Jalisco, Mexico, who engaged in the cattle and wine businesses and held at various local and state offices in California; of his grandson, Reginaldo Francisco (1854-1938), who was also active in state politics; Ysabel Varela del Valle (Reginaldo’s mother); and other family members.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic-Cultural Monument (HCM) List City Declared Monuments
    Historic-Cultural Monument (HCM) List City Declared Monuments No. Name Address CHC No.CF No. Adopted Notes 1 Leonis Adobe 23537 Calabasas Road 8/6/1962 2 Bolton Hall 10116 Commerce Avenue 8/6/1962 3 Nuestra Senora la Reina de Los 100-110 Cesar E. Chavez Ave 8/6/1962 Angeles (Plaza Church) & 535 N. Main St 535 N. Main Street & 100-110 Cesar Chavez Av 4 Angel's Flight 4th Street & Hill8/6/1962 Dismantled 05/1969; Relocated to Hill Street Between 3rd St. & 4th St. in 1996 5 The Salt Box (Former Site of) 339 S. Bunker Hill Avenue 8/6/1962 Relocated to (Now Hope Street) Heritage Square in 1969; Destroyed by Fire 10/09/1969 6 Bradbury Building 216-224 W. 3rd Street 9/21/1962 300-310 S. Broadway 7 Romulo Pico Adobe (Rancho Romulo) 10940 Sepulveda Boulevard 9/21/1962 8 Foy House 1335-1341 1/2 Carroll Avenue 9/21/1962 9 Shadow Ranch House 22633 Vanowen Street 11/2/1962 10 Eagle Rock 72-77 Patrician Way 11/16/1962 7650-7694 Scholl Canyon Road Eagle Rock View Drive North Figueroa (Terminus) 11 West Temple Apartments (The 1012 W. Temple Street 1/4/1963 Rochester) 12 Hollyhock House 4800 Hollywood Boulevard 1/4/1963 13 Rocha House 2400 Shenandoah Street 1/28/1963 14 Chatsworth Community Church 22601 Lassen Street 2/15/1963 (Oakwood Memorial Park) 15 Towers of Simon Rodia (Watts 10618-10626 Graham Avenue 3/1/1963 Towers) 1711-1765 E. 107th Street 16 Saint Joseph's Church (site of) 1200-1210 S.
    [Show full text]
  • Or, Early Times in Southern California. by Major Horace Bell
    Reminiscences of a ranger; or, Early times in southern California. By Major Horace Bell REMINISCENCES —OF A— RANGER —OR,— EARLY TIMES —IN— SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, By MAJOR HORACE BELL. LOS ANGELES: YARNELL, CAYSTILE & MATHES, PRINTERS. 1881. Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1881, by HORACE BELL, In the office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington, D.C. TO THE FEW Reminiscences of a ranger; or, Early times in southern California. By Major Horace Bell http://www.loc.gov/resource/calbk.103 SURVIVING MEMBERS OF THE LOS ANGELES RANGERS, AND TO THE MEMORY OF THOSE WHO HAVE ANSWERED TO THE LAST ROLL-CALL, THIS HUMBLE TRIBUTE IS AFFECTIONATELY DEDICATED BY THE AUTHOR. PREFACE. No country or section during the first decade following the conquest of California, has been more prolific of adventure than our own bright and beautiful land; and to rescue from threatened oblivion the incidents herein related, and either occurring under the personal observation of the author, or related to him on the ground by the actors therein, and to give place on the page of history to the names of brave and worthy men who figured in the stirring events of the times referred to, as well as to portray pioneer life as it then existed, not only among the American pioneers, but also the California Spaniards, the author sends forth his book of Reminiscences, trusting that its many imperfections may be charitably scrutinized by a criticising public, and that the honesty of purpose with which it is written will be duly appreciated. H. B.
    [Show full text]
  • Sixty Years in Southern California, 1853-1913, Containing the Reminiscences of Harris Newmark
    Sixty years in Southern California, 1853-1913, containing the reminiscences of Harris Newmark. Edited by Maurice H. Newmark; Marco R. Newmark HARRIS NEWMARK AET. LXXIX SIXTY YEARS IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 1853-1913 CONTAINING THE REMINISCENCES OF HARRIS NEWMARK EDITED BY MAURICE H. NEWMARK MARCO R. NEWMARK Every generation enjoys the use of a vast hoard bequeathed to it by antiquity, and transmits that hoard, augmented by fresh acquisitions, to future ages. In these pursuits, therefore, the first speculators lie under great disadvantages, and, even when they fail, are entitled to praise.— MACAULAY. WITH 150 ILLUSTRATIONS Sixty years in Southern California, 1853-1913, containing the reminiscences of Harris Newmark. Edited by Maurice H. Newmark; Marco R. Newmark http://www.loc.gov/resource/calbk.023 NEW YORK THE KNICKERBOCKER PRESS 1916 Copyright, 1916 BY M. H. and M. R. NEWMARK v TO THE MEMORY OF MY WIFE v In Memoriam At the hour of high twelve on April the fourth, 1916, the sun shone into a room where lay the temporal abode, for eighty-one years and more, of the spirit of Harris Newmark. On his face still lingered that look of peace which betokens a life worthily used and gently relinquished. Many were the duties allotted him in his pilgrimage splendidly did he accomplish them! Providence permitted him the completion of his final task—a labor of love—but denied him the privilege of seeing it given to the community of his adoption. To him and to her, by whose side he sleeps, may it be both monument and epitaph. Thy will be done! M.
    [Show full text]