The Third Tone According to Hermann Von Helmholtz. Mion Marta
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
An Assessment of Sound Annoyance As a Function of Consonance
An Assessment of Sound Annoyance as a Function of Consonance Song Hui Chon CCRMA / Electrical Engineering Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305 [email protected] Abstract In this paper I study the annoyance generated by synthetic auditory stimuli as a function of consonance. The concept of consonance is one of the building blocks for Western music theory, and recently tonal consonance (to distinguish from musical consonance) is getting attention from the psychoacoustics community as a perception parameter. This paper presents an analysis of the experimental result from a previous study, using tonal consonance as a factor. The result shows that there is a direct correlation between annoyance and consonance and that perceptual annoyance, for the given manner of stimulus presentation, increases as a stimulus becomes more consonant at a given loudness level. 1 Introduction 1.1 Addressing Annoyance Annoyance is one of the most common feelings people experience everyday in this modern society. It is a highly subjective sensation; however this paper presumes that there is a commonality behind each person's annoyance perception. It is generally understood that one aspect of annoyance is a direct correlation with spectral power [1], although the degree of correlation is under investigation [2][3]. Previous studies have assumed that noise level is a strict gauge for determining annoyance [4], but it is reasonable to suggest that the influence of sound level might be more subtle; annoyance is, after all, a subjective and highly personal characteristic. One study reveals that subjects perceive annoyance differently based on their ability to influence it [5]. Another demonstrates that age plays a significant role in annoyance judgments [6], though conflicting results indicate more complex issues. -
On an Experimentum Crucis for Optics
Research Report: On an Experimentum Crucis for Optics Ionel DINU, M.Sc. Teacher of Physics E-mail: [email protected] (Dated: November 17, 2010) Abstract Formulated almost 150 years ago, Thomas Young’s hypothesis that light might be a transverse wave has never been seriously questioned, much less subjected to experiment. In this article I report on an attempt to prove experimentally that Young’s hypothesis is untenable. Although it has certain limitations, the experiment seems to show that sound in air, a longitudinal wave, can be “polarized” by reflection just like light, and this can be used as evidence against Young’s hypothesis. Further refinements of the experimental setup may yield clearer results, making this report useful to those interested in the important issue of whether light is a transverse or a longitudinal wave. Introduction In the course of development of science, there has always been a close connection between sound and light [1]. Acoustics stimulated research and discovery in optics and vice-versa. Reflection and refraction being the first common points observed between the two, the analogy between optical and acoustical phenomena has been proven also in the case of interference, diffraction, Doppler effect, and even in their mode of production: sounds are produced by the vibration of macroscopic objects, while light is produced by vibrating molecules and atoms. The wave nature of sound implies that light is also a wave and, if matter must be present for sound to be propagated, then aether must exist in order to account for the propagation of light through spaces void of all the matter known to chemistry. -
Comparison of Procedures for Determination of Acoustic Nonlinearity of Some Inhomogeneous Materials
Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Dec 17, 2017 Comparison of procedures for determination of acoustic nonlinearity of some inhomogeneous materials Jensen, Leif Bjørnø Published in: Acoustical Society of America. Journal Link to article, DOI: 10.1121/1.2020879 Publication date: 1983 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link back to DTU Orbit Citation (APA): Jensen, L. B. (1983). Comparison of procedures for determination of acoustic nonlinearity of some inhomogeneous materials. Acoustical Society of America. Journal, 74(S1), S27-S27. DOI: 10.1121/1.2020879 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. PROGRAM OF The 106thMeeting of the AcousticalSociety of America Town and CountryHotel © San Diego, California © 7-11 November1983 TUESDAY MORNING, 8 NOVEMBER 1983 SENATE/COMMITTEEROOMS, 8:30 A.M. TO 12:10P.M. Session A. Underwater Acoustics: Arctic Acoustics I William Mosely,Chairman Naval ResearchLaboratory, Washington, DC 20375 Chairman's Introductions8:30 Invited Papers 8:35 A1. -
Tutorial #5 Solutions
Name: Other group members: Tutorial #5 Solutions PHYS 1240: Sound and Music Friday, July 19, 2019 Instructions: Work in groups of 3 or 4 to answer the following questions. Write your solu- tions on this copy of the tutorial|each person should have their own copy, but make sure you agree on everything as a group. When you're finished, keep this copy of your tutorial for reference|no need to turn it in (grades are based on participation, not accuracy). 1. When telephones were first being developed by Bell Labs, they realized it would not be feasible to have them detect all frequencies over the human audible range (20 Hz - 20 kHz). Instead, they defined a frequency response so that the highest-pitched sounds telephones could receive is 3400 Hz and lowest-pitched sounds they could detect are at 340 Hz, which saved on costs considerably. a) Assume the temperature in air is 15◦C. How large are the biggest and smallest wavelengths of sound in air that telephones are able to receive? We can find the wavelength from the formula v = λf, but first we'll need the speed: v = 331 + (0:6 × 15◦C) = 340 m/s Now, we find the wavelengths for the two ends of the frequency range given: v 340 m/s λ = = = 0.1 m smallest f 3400 Hz v 340 m/s λ = = = 1 m largest f 340 Hz Therefore, perhaps surprisingly, telephones can pick up sound waves up to a meter long, but they won't detect waves as small as the ear receiver itself. -
L Atdment OFFICF QO9ENT ROOM 36
*;JiQYL~dW~llbk~ieira - - ~-- -, - ., · LAtDMENT OFFICF QO9ENT ROOM 36 ?ESEARC L0ORATORY OF RL C.f:'__ . /j16baV"BLI:1!S INSTITUTE 0i'7Cn' / PERCEPTION OF MUSICAL INTERVALS: EVIDENCE FOR THE CENTRAL ORIGIN OF THE PITCH OF COMPLEX TONES ADRIANUS J. M. HOUTSMA JULIUS L. GOLDSTEIN LO N OPY TECHNICAL REPORT 484 OCTOBER I, 1971 MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH LABORATORY OF ELECTRONICS CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS 02139 The Research Laboratory of Electronics is an interdepartmental laboratory in which faculty members and graduate students from numerous academic departments conduct research. The research reported in this document was made possible in part by support extended the Massachusetts Institute of Tech- nology, Research Laboratory of Electronics, by the JOINT SER- VICES ELECTRONICS PROGRAMS (U. S. Army, U. S. Navy, and U.S. Air Force) under Contract No. DAAB07-71-C-0300, and by the National Institutes of Health (Grant 5 PO1 GM14940-05). Requestors having DOD contracts or grants should apply for copies of technical reports to the Defense Documentation Center, Cameron Station, Alexandria, Virginia 22314; all others should apply to the Clearinghouse for Federal Scientific and Technical Information, Sills Building, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, Virginia 22151. THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE AND SALE; ITS DISTRIBUTION IS UNLIMITED. MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH LABORATORY OF ELECTRONICS Technical Report 484 October 1, 1971 PERCEPTION OF MUSICAL INTERVALS: EVIDENCE FOR THE CENTRAL ORIGIN OF COMPLEX TONES Adrianus J. M. Houtsma and Julius L. Goldstein This report is based on a thesis by A. J. M. Houtsma submitted to the Department of Electrical Engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, June 1971, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. -
Thomas Young the Man Who Knew Everything
Thomas Young The man Who Knew Everything Andrew Robinson marvels at the brain power and breadth of knowledge of the 18th-century polymath Thomas Young. He examines his relationship with his contemporaries, particularly with the French Egyptologist Champollion, and how he has been viewed subsequently by historians. ORTUNATE NEWTON, happy professor of natural philosophy at childhood of science!’ Albert the newly founded Royal Institution, F Einstein wrote in 1931 in his where in 1802-03 he delivered what foreword to the fourth edition of is generally regarded as the most far- Newton’s influential treatise Opticks, reaching series of lectures ever given originally published in 1704. by a scientist; a physician at a major London hospital, St George’s, for a Nature to him was an open book, quarter of a century; the secretary of whose letters he could read without the Admiralty’s Board of Longitude effort. ... Reflection, refraction, the and superintendent of its vital Nauti- formation of images by lenses, the cal Almanac from 1818 until his mode of operation of the eye, the death; and ‘inspector of calculations’ spectral decomposition and recom- for a leading life insurance company position of the different kinds of in the 1820s. In 1794, he was elected light, the invention of the reflecting a fellow of the Royal Society at the telescope, the first foundations of age of barely twenty-one, became its colour theory, the elementary theory foreign secretary at the age of thirty, of the rainbow pass by us in and turned down its presidency in procession, and finally come his his fifties. -
AN INTRODUCTION to MUSIC THEORY Revision A
AN INTRODUCTION TO MUSIC THEORY Revision A By Tom Irvine Email: [email protected] July 4, 2002 ________________________________________________________________________ Historical Background Pythagoras of Samos was a Greek philosopher and mathematician, who lived from approximately 560 to 480 BC. Pythagoras and his followers believed that all relations could be reduced to numerical relations. This conclusion stemmed from observations in music, mathematics, and astronomy. Pythagoras studied the sound produced by vibrating strings. He subjected two strings to equal tension. He then divided one string exactly in half. When he plucked each string, he discovered that the shorter string produced a pitch which was one octave higher than the longer string. A one-octave separation occurs when the higher frequency is twice the lower frequency. German scientist Hermann Helmholtz (1821-1894) made further contributions to music theory. Helmholtz wrote “On the Sensations of Tone” to establish the scientific basis of musical theory. Natural Frequencies of Strings A note played on a string has a fundamental frequency, which is its lowest natural frequency. The note also has overtones at consecutive integer multiples of its fundamental frequency. Plucking a string thus excites a number of tones. Ratios The theories of Pythagoras and Helmholz depend on the frequency ratios shown in Table 1. Table 1. Standard Frequency Ratios Ratio Name 1:1 Unison 1:2 Octave 1:3 Twelfth 2:3 Fifth 3:4 Fourth 4:5 Major Third 3:5 Major Sixth 5:6 Minor Third 5:8 Minor Sixth 1 These ratios apply both to a fundamental frequency and its overtones, as well as to relationship between separate keys. -
The Tuning Fork: an Amazing Acoustics Apparatus
FEATURED ARTICLE The Tuning Fork: An Amazing Acoustics Apparatus Daniel A. Russell It seems like such a simple device: a U-shaped piece of metal and Helmholtz resonators were two of the most impor- with a stem to hold it; a simple mechanical object that, when tant items of equipment in an acoustics laboratory. In 1834, struck lightly, produces a single-frequency pure tone. And Johann Scheibler, a silk manufacturer without a scientific yet, this simple appearance is deceptive because a tuning background, created a tonometer, a set of precisely tuned fork exhibits several complicated vibroacoustic phenomena. resonators (in this case tuning forks, although others used A tuning fork vibrates with several symmetrical and asym- Helmholtz resonators) used to determine the frequency of metrical flexural bending modes; it exhibits the nonlinear another sound, essentially a mechanical frequency ana- phenomenon of integer harmonics for large-amplitude lyzer. Scheibler’s tonometer consisted of 56 tuning forks, displacements; and the stem oscillates at the octave of the spanning the octave from A3 220 Hz to A4 440 Hz in steps fundamental frequency of the tines even though the tines of 4 Hz (Helmholtz, 1885, p. 441); he achieved this accu- have no octave component. A tuning fork radiates sound as racy by modifying each fork until it produced exactly 4 a linear quadrupole source, with a distinct transition from beats per second with the preceding fork in the set. At the a complicated near-field to a simpler far-field radiation pat- 1876 Philadelphia Centennial Exposition, Rudolph Koenig, tern. This transition from near field to far field can be seen the premier manufacturer of acoustics apparatus during in the directivity patterns, time-averaged vector intensity, the second half of the nineteenth century, displayed his and the phase relationship between pressure and particle Grand Tonometer with 692 precision tuning forks ranging velocity. -
Large Scale Sound Installation Design: Psychoacoustic Stimulation
LARGE SCALE SOUND INSTALLATION DESIGN: PSYCHOACOUSTIC STIMULATION An Interactive Qualifying Project Report submitted to the Faculty of the WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science by Taylor H. Andrews, CS 2012 Mark E. Hayden, ECE 2012 Date: 16 December 2010 Professor Frederick W. Bianchi, Advisor Abstract The brain performs a vast amount of processing to translate the raw frequency content of incoming acoustic stimuli into the perceptual equivalent. Psychoacoustic processing can result in pitches and beats being “heard” that do not physically exist in the medium. These psychoac- oustic effects were researched and then applied in a large scale sound design. The constructed installations and acoustic stimuli were designed specifically to combat sensory atrophy by exer- cising and reinforcing the listeners’ perceptual skills. i Table of Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................................ i Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................ ii Table of Figures ............................................................................................................................. iii Table of Tables .............................................................................................................................. iv Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................. -
Combination Tones and Other Related Auditory Phenomena
t he university ot cbtcago ro m a n wyo ur: no c xxuu.“ COMBINATION TONES AND OTHER RELATED AUDITORY PHENOMENA A DI SSERTA TION SUBMITTED TO THE FA CULTY OF TH E GRADUA TE SCHOOL OF A RTS AND LITERATURE IN CANDIDA CY FO R THE DEG REE OF DOCTOR OF PHI LOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF PSY CHOLOGY BY JOSEPH PETERSON u rr N o o r r un Psvc a o wc xcu. Rm " wa Sm u n . Pvumun AS “o uo c 39 , 1 908. PREFA CE . The first part of this mo no graph is devo ted primarily to a critical exposition of the important theories of combination to n and t t nt e n es a s a eme of th facts upo which they rest . This undertaking i nevitably leads to the mention of a considerable number of closely related phenomena whose significance for I e general theo ry is often crucial . n view of th conditions l n in the t t the t it n th t prevai i g li era ure of subjec , has bee ough expedient that this presentation should in the main follow h n n . n c nt nts c ro ological li es The full a alyt ical table of o e , t t t the n int n n oge her wi h divisio o sect io s , will readily e able he x readers who so desire to consult t te t o n special topics . The second part of the monograph report s cert ain experimcnta l t n t observa io s made by the au hor o n summation tones . -
Apparatus Named After Our Academic Ancestors, III
Digital Kenyon: Research, Scholarship, and Creative Exchange Faculty Publications Physics 2014 Apparatus Named After Our Academic Ancestors, III Tom Greenslade Kenyon College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digital.kenyon.edu/physics_publications Part of the Physics Commons Recommended Citation “Apparatus Named After Our Academic Ancestors III”, The Physics Teacher, 52, 360-363 (2014) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Physics at Digital Kenyon: Research, Scholarship, and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Digital Kenyon: Research, Scholarship, and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Apparatus Named After Our Academic Ancestors, III Thomas B. Greenslade Jr. Citation: The Physics Teacher 52, 360 (2014); doi: 10.1119/1.4893092 View online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.4893092 View Table of Contents: http://scitation.aip.org/content/aapt/journal/tpt/52/6?ver=pdfcov Published by the American Association of Physics Teachers Articles you may be interested in Crystal (Xal) radios for learning physics Phys. Teach. 53, 317 (2015); 10.1119/1.4917450 Apparatus Named After Our Academic Ancestors — II Phys. Teach. 49, 28 (2011); 10.1119/1.3527751 Apparatus Named After Our Academic Ancestors — I Phys. Teach. 48, 604 (2010); 10.1119/1.3517028 Physics Northwest: An Academic Alliance Phys. Teach. 45, 421 (2007); 10.1119/1.2783150 From Our Files Phys. Teach. 41, 123 (2003); 10.1119/1.1542054 This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AAPT content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. -
Quantum Weirdness: a Beginner's Guide
Quantum Weirdness: A Beginner’s Guide Dr. Andrew Robinson Part 1 Introduction The Quantum Jump 9:38 AM About Me • From Bakewell • PhD in Physical Chemistry • Worked in Berlin, Liverpool, Birmingham • In Canada since 2000 • Worked at University of Saskatchewan • Moved to Ottawa in 2010 • Teach Physics at Carleton 9:38 AM In This Lecture Series • We will talk about • What does Quantum Mean? • Quantum Effects • What are the ramifications of Quantum Theory • How Quantum Theory impacts our everyday lives • I will show a few equations, but you don’t need to know any mathematics • Please ask questions at any time 9:38 AM Books “How to Teach Quantum Physics to your Dog” by Chad Orzel “30-Second Quantum Theory” By Brian Clegg (ed.) 9:38 AM Definition of “Quantum” Physics • A discrete quantity of energy proportional in magnitude to the frequency of the radiation it represents. Legal • A required or allowed amount, especially an amount of money legally payable in damages. 9:38 AM • Quantum Satis “as much as is sufficient“ – pharmacology and medicine • Quantum Salis “the amount which is enough” • Quantum comes from the Latin word quantus, meaning "how great". Used by the German Physicist Hermann von Helmholtz ( who was also a physician) in the context of the electron (quanta of electricity) Use by Einstein in 1905 "Lichtquanta” – particle of light 9:38 AM “Quantum Jump” & “Quantum Leap” • Colloquially “A sudden large increase or advance”. • In physics “A jump between two discrete energy levels in a quantum system” (Actually a rather small leap in terms of energy!) 9:38 AM Quantum Properties in Physics • Properties which can only take certain values When you are on the ladder, you must be on one of the steps: 4 1 3 2 Quantum 2 3 Numbers 1 4 9:38 AM • Not every quantity in physics is quantized • Your height from the ground when on the slide varies continuously Maximum height Minimum9:38 AM height • Whether you can treat the system as continuous, or quantum depends on the scale.