DOCSLIB.ORG

Dasineura Rubiformis (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dasineura Rubiformis (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) Research in Action South African Journal of Science 104, July/August 2008 247 closely synchronized with the distinct Dasineura rubiformis (Diptera: flowering pulse exhibited by Acacia mearnsii during spring (September/Octo- Cecidomyiidae), a new biological ber). Adult D. rubiformis live only a few days and females require open flowers for control agent for Acacia mearnsii oviposition, so this synchrony is essential. The eggs are laid within the perianth tube in South Africa of the flower and, on hatching, the larvae start feeding on the surface of the ovary, F.A.C. Impsona,b*, C.A. Kleinjanb, J.H. Hoffmannb and J.A. Posta at the same time inducing gall-formation and preventing pod set by affected flow- ers. The flowers of A. mearnsii occur in cecidomyiid midge, Dasineura rubifor- programme against invasive Australian globular flower-heads, each with about 45 mis, is the most recent addition to the Acacia species in South Africa has been flowers. Afflicted flower-heads generally Asuite of biological control agents that fraught with conflict, particularly due to produce a small, tightly packed cluster of have been deployed in South Africa against the economic importance (for tannin up to 36 galls [10.5 ± 1.0 s.e., n =83at invasive Australian Acacia species. This insect 14–18 is associated with Acacia mearnsii (black and paper pulp) of black wattle. As a Stellenbosch in July 2007 (unpublished wattle), which is extremely invasive, but also compromise, the choice of biological data)] instead of pods. Each gall within an important agro-forestry species, in South control agents has been restricted to those the cluster contains 1–5 chambers, and Africa. It induces development of galls in the that reduce the reproductive capacity but generally a single larva develops within flowers of A. mearnsii, thereby preventing not the useful attributes of the plants.6,18,19 each chamber. Third-instar larvae emerge pod development and reducing the reproduc- The concerns about biological control from the galls during winter (June/July) tive capacity of the plants. The useful attributes potentially disrupting commercial supplies and drop to the soil where they pupate in of this economically important plant species of seed were resolved by demonstrating should not be affected by the introduction of silken cocoons. D. rubiformis. The midge is established in the that the prospective agents can be effec- vicinity of Stellenbosch, where it is increas- tively controlled with conventional insec- Host range ing in abundance. Studies have been initiated ticides,3,20 some of which are routinely Surveys in Australia of 147 native Acacia to (i) evaluate the performance of the midge; applied in wattle plantations.21–23 species, including 27 within the section (ii) confirm that galling does not cause a reduc- The first agent to be released against Botrycephalae, along with three intro- tion in vegetative growth of A. mearnsii; and A. mearnsii was a seed-feeding weevil, duced African species and one intro- (iii) determine the potential effectiveness of Melanterius maculatus, which is now estab- duced American species,3 showed that, D. rubiformis as a biological control agent lished at a number of sites across the besides A. mearnsii, D. rubiformis may be of A. mearnsii. All indications are that the 6 insect has the potential to become an excellent country. Although M. maculatus can associated with the following Botry- seed-reducing biological control agent of cause substantial levels of seed reduction cephalae species in eastern Australia: Aca- A. mearnsii. of A. mearnsii, considerable quantities cia parramattensis, A. irrorata, A. deanei, of seed are still produced annually (F. A. leucoclada and A. constablei. The struc- Background Impson, unpublished data). The addition ture of galls on these five species resem- A diverse array of gall midges (Cecido- of complementary biological control bles that of D. rubiformis on A. mearnsii myiidae) is associated with the Australian agents to further reduce reproductive and DNA sequences of larvae from the acacias in their native habitat.1 In the late output of A. mearnsii was therefore desir- first four species matched those of D. rubi- 1990s, attention was focused on them in a able. formis. Larvae from the fifth species were drive to find additional biological control Eight gall midge species are associated not sequenced. To confirm these putative agents for use against invasive Australian with the reproductive structures of black identifications, adults need to be reared Acacia species in South Africa with empha- wattle in Australia. Of these, D. rubiformis from the galls and examined.1 In Western sis on black wattle (Acacia mearnsii).2,3 was considered to be the most suitable Australia, where both insect and host Acacia mearnsii is one of South Africa’s candidate for use in the biological control plant are naturalized, D. rubiformis was most widespread and problematic invasive programme against black wattle in South found only on A. mearnsii.1 Of the species plants.4–7 Its presence in natural forests, Africa. This decision was based partly on listed above, only A. mearnsii currently grasslands and water courses continues observations that D. rubiformis substantially occurs in South Africa. to threaten ecosystems in terms of loss of reduces pod production of A. mearnsii in Host-specificity tests, conducted at the biodiversity, reduced water supplies, in- Western Australia, where both the midge Plant Protection Research Institute in creased soil erosion and by exacerbating and host plant have become naturalized Stellenbosch between 1999 and 2001, the intensity of fires.8–12 The success of after being introduced from eastern confirmed the restricted host range of the plant as an invasive weed and its Australia.3 In this article we summarize D. rubiformis. During these studies flow- persistence in the landscape is largely progress with D. rubiformis in South Africa ering branches of 10 Australian Acacia attributable to the annual production of and discuss the issues that need to be species [including four species from the enormous seed crops which accumulate addressed before the insect is exploited section Botrycephalae, namely, A. mearn- and persist in the soil for many years.6,13 fully as a biological control agent of sii, A. dealbata, A. baileyana and A. decur- Historically, the biological control A. mearnsii. rens, 13 African Acacia species, an Ameri- can acacia, and an additional four species aPlant Protection Research Institute, Private Bag X5017, Stellenbosch 7600, South Africa. Life cycle of D. rubiformis of test plant (Paraserianthes lophantha, bZoology Department, University of Cape Town, Private The life cycle of D. rubiformis has been Mimosaceae; Cydonia oblonga and Prunus Bag, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa. described by Adair.3 It is a univoltine armeniaca, both Rosaceae; and Vitis vini- *Author for correspondence. E-mail: [email protected] species in which adult emergence is fera, Vitaceae)] were exposed to cohorts 248 South African Journal of Science 104, July/August 2008 Research in Action of D. rubiformis adults and monitored for Africa. Qualitative assessments have Weeds, ed. N.R. Spencer, pp. 605–614. Bozeman, Montana. subsequent development of galls. Under shown that levels of galling are increasing 3. Adair R.J. (2004). Seed-reducing Cecidomyiidae as the test conditions, gall induction occurred (unpublished data). In 2006, galls were potential biological control agents for invasive Austra- only on A. mearnsii.3 detectable over a range that extended lian wattles in South Africa, particularly Acacia for about 800 m. In 2007 this range had mearnsii and A. cyclops. Ph.D. thesis, University Host plant growth of Cape Town, South Africa. increased sixfold, up to 5000 m. In Western 4. Stirton C.H. (ed.) (1978). Plant Invaders, Beautiful One of the concerns when using biolog- Australia D. rubiformis has demonstrated but Dangerous. Department of Nature and Envi- ical control agents that reduce seed pro- an ability to locate disparate populations ronmental Conservation of the Cape Provincial duction of invasive acacias by forming Administration, Cape Town. of A. mearnsii, including trees that occur in 5. Versfeld D.B., le Maitre D.C. and Chapman R.A. 3 galls is that the galling may also suppress isolation. The midge will probably show (1998). Alien invading plants and water resources in the growth rate of the host plants. A case the same dispersal ability and eventually South Africa: a preliminary assessment. WRC Report in point is that of the gall wasp, Trichilogaster become established widely in South No. TT99/98, CSIR No. ENV/S-C 97154. Pretoria. acaciaelongifoliae, which is an extremely 6. Dennill G.B., Donnelly D., Stewart K. and Impson Africa. At present no efforts are being F.A.C. (1999). Insect agents used for the biological effective biological control agent of A. made to distribute the insects manually control of Australian Acacia species and Paraserian- 18,24 longifolia in South Africa. Although until the completion of studies, to confirm thes lophantha (Willd.) Nielsen (Fabaceae) in South most T. acaciaelongifoliae galls are induced Africa. African Entomology, Memoir No. 1, 45–54. that D. rubiformis is no threat to the integ- 7. Henderson L. (2001). Alien Weeds and Invasive in flower buds, the wasps also stunt vege- rity of the wattle industry. Plants. A complete guide to declared weeds and tative growth of A. longifolia because: (i) These studies have begun and include invaders in South Africa. Agricultural Research Council, Pretoria. galls induced in vegetative meristematic monitoring of the extent and intensity of tissues destroy the growth points which 8. Macdonald I.A.W. and Jarman M.L. (eds) (1984). galling on A. mearnsii along with rates of Invasive alien organisms in the terrestrial ecosystems of would give rise to new stems; and (ii) galls spread and impact on pod production. the fynbos biome, South Africa.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (Hymenoptera: Eurytomidae) in the Integrated Control of Acacia Species in South Africa
    Proceedings of the X International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds 919 4-14 July 1999, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, USA Neal R. Spencer [ed.]. pp. 919-929 (2000) The Potential Role of Bruchophagus acaciae (Cameron) (Hymenoptera: Eurytomidae) in the Integrated Control of Acacia Species in South Africa R. L. HILL1, A. J. GORDON2, and S. NESER3 1Richard Hill & Associates, Private Bag 4704, Christchurch, New Zealand 2Plant Protection Research Institute, Private Bag X5017, Stellenbosch, 7599 South Africa 3Plant Protection Research Institute, Private Bag X134, Pretoria, 0001 South Africa Abstract Australian acacias invade watersheds and riverbeds in South Africa, reducing water flows and threatening environmental and economic values. Acacia mearnsii is the most widespread and important weed but also forms the basis of an important industry. A. dealbata, and to a lesser extent A. decurrens are also problems. All belong to the Section Botrycephalae of the sub-genus Heterophyllum. Short term control is achieved locally by removing plants, and by using herbicides, but seed-feeding control agents may provide an acceptable solution in the long term. Larvae of Bruchophagus acaciae (Cameron) (Hymenoptera: Eurytomidae) develop in the seeds of acacias. It was described from New Zealand, but is an Australian species. We explore whether B. acaciae has a role as a con- trol agent for acacias in South Africa. Seed was collected from 28 Australian species of Acacia growing in New Zealand. Attack was restricted to four of the seven species with- in the Section Botrycephalae, and two cases of attack on Acacia rubida (Section Phyllodineae; n=9). Apart from a wasp reared from one seed, A.
    [Show full text]
  • Bionomics of Bagworms (Lepidoptera: Psychidae)
    ANRV363-EN54-11 ARI 27 August 2008 20:44 V I E E W R S I E N C N A D V A Bionomics of Bagworms ∗ (Lepidoptera: Psychidae) Marc Rhainds,1 Donald R. Davis,2 and Peter W. Price3 1Department of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, 47901; email: [email protected] 2Department of Entomology, Smithsonian Institution, Washington D.C., 20013-7012; email: [email protected] 3Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, 86011-5640; email: [email protected] Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2009. 54:209–26 Key Words The Annual Review of Entomology is online at bottom-up effects, flightlessness, mating failure, parthenogeny, ento.annualreviews.org phylogenetic constraint hypothesis, protogyny This article’s doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.54.110807.090448 Abstract Copyright c 2009 by Annual Reviews. The bagworm family (Lepidoptera: Psychidae) includes approximately All rights reserved 1000 species, all of which complete larval development within a self- 0066-4170/09/0107-0209$20.00 enclosing bag. The family is remarkable in that female aptery occurs in ∗The U.S. Government has the right to retain a over half of the known species and within 9 of the 10 currently recog- nonexclusive, royalty-free license in and to any nized subfamilies. In the more derived subfamilies, several life-history copyright covering this paper. traits are associated with eruptive population dynamics, e.g., neoteny of females, high fecundity, dispersal on silken threads, and high level of polyphagy. Other salient features shared by many species include a short embryonic period, developmental synchrony, sexual segrega- tion of pupation sites, short longevity of adults, male-biased sex ratio, sexual dimorphism, protogyny, parthenogenesis, and oviposition in the pupal case.
    [Show full text]
  • Acacias and Galls. Acaciaelongifoliae
    Australian Native Plants Society (Australia) Inc. ACACIA STUDY GROUP NEWSLETTER Group Leader and Newsletter Editor Seed Bank Curator Bill Aitchison Victoria Tanner 13 Conos Court, Donvale, Vic 3111 Phone (03) 98723583 Email: [email protected] Acacia brunioides No. 139 December 2017 ISSN 1035-4638 From The Leader Contents Page Dear Members From the Leader 1 As I write this short message in December, typically for this Welcome 2 time of year there are few wattles in flower in our garden – From Members and Readers 2 Acacia implexa and A. muelleriana are the two exceptions, Acacia cretacea 5 together with just a few flowers on A. deanei. But at this Acacia pruinosa 6 time of year, it is never the wattle flowers that create the Acacia rhetinocarpa 6 interest, but rather the seeds that have matured. Acacias and Galls 8 Archibald James Campbell 9 There are always some interesting observations in relation Xylella fastidiosa 9 to seeds. For example, I find it interesting that seeds from Wattle Family Plumbing 10 last year’s flowering of both A. implexa and A. muelleriana Use of Acacia dealbata in dyeing 10 mature at the same time as this year’s flowering, so they Seed Bank 10 have taken close to a year to come to maturity. In relation Study Group Membership 11 to A. implexa, there has been a carpet of seeds lying on the Financial Report 2016-17 11 ground underneath the trees – but then when one looks into Seed Bank Listing 12 the canopy of the trees, noisy rainbow lorikeets are obviously enjoying the seeds, at least their white fleshy arils.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity and Ecology of Critically Endangered, Rûens Silcrete Renosterveld in the Buffeljagsrivier Area, Swellendam
    Biodiversity and Ecology of Critically Endangered, Rûens Silcrete Renosterveld in the Buffeljagsrivier area, Swellendam by Johannes Philippus Groenewald Thesis presented in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Masters in Science in Conservation Ecology in the Faculty of AgriSciences at Stellenbosch University Supervisor: Prof. Michael J. Samways Co-supervisor: Dr. Ruan Veldtman December 2014 Stellenbosch University http://scholar.sun.ac.za Declaration I hereby declare that the work contained in this thesis, for the degree of Master of Science in Conservation Ecology, is my own work that have not been previously published in full or in part at any other University. All work that are not my own, are acknowledge in the thesis. ___________________ Date: ____________ Groenewald J.P. Copyright © 2014 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved ii Stellenbosch University http://scholar.sun.ac.za Acknowledgements Firstly I want to thank my supervisor Prof. M. J. Samways for his guidance and patience through the years and my co-supervisor Dr. R. Veldtman for his help the past few years. This project would not have been possible without the help of Prof. H. Geertsema, who helped me with the identification of the Lepidoptera and other insect caught in the study area. Also want to thank Dr. K. Oberlander for the help with the identification of the Oxalis species found in the study area and Flora Cameron from CREW with the identification of some of the special plants growing in the area. I further express my gratitude to Dr. Odette Curtis from the Overberg Renosterveld Project, who helped with the identification of the rare species found in the study area as well as information about grazing and burning of Renosterveld.
    [Show full text]
  • BOTANICAL ODD BALLS …. Gail Slykhuis
    BOTANICAL ODD BALLS …. Gail Slykhuis On a recent ANGAIR nature ramble where the subject of plant identification was Drooping Sheoak, Allocasuarina verticillata, I recounted my early confusion associated with the fruiting cones of this species. As a dioecious plant, Drooping Sheoak has separate male and female plants, which should be easily identifiable when flowering, particularly where the female cones are present. The male plants have catkins, the female plants have flowers which develop into woody cones. However, what I discovered were woody cones on male plants. The cause of my confusion was the presence of woody galls, deceptively formed to blend in, masquerading as female cones and housing a solitary insect. Apparently, I am not the only one to be deceived, ‘Various species of insects, especially coccoids, Hemiptera, (Gullan 1984), form distinctive galls on Casuarinaceae; some of these may be mistaken for fruiting cones but they are Female cones, Allocasuarina actually modified vegetative branchlets,’ Vol. 3 Flora of Australia. verticillata This article investigates several galls commonly observed on our local vegetation. Allocasuarina Galls - Cylindrococcus spp. Coccid insects, closely related to scale and mealy bugs are responsible for the galls found on Allocasuarina species. Galls are growth malformations and in this situation are caused through the feeding action of the insect. The sap sucking feeding of Coccid insects ensures their saliva comes into close contact with the plant cells. Such contact can stimulate the plant to form galls which will resemble the fruit of Allocasuarina species. These galls will be home to either a male or a female insect Mature Allocasuarina gall Young Allocasuarina gall and by opening a gall you may be lucky enough to locate a cavity containing a pink, fleshy, legless, creature approx.
    [Show full text]
  • Acacia Flat Mite (Brevipalpus Acadiae Ryke & Meyer, Tenuipalpidae, Acarina): Doringboomplatmyt
    Creepie-crawlies and such comprising: Common Names of Insects 1963, indicated as CNI Butterfly List 1959, indicated as BL Some names the sources of which are unknown, and indicated as such Gewone Insekname SKOENLAPPERLYS INSLUITENDE BOSLUISE, MYTE, SAAMGESTEL DEUR DIE AALWURMS EN SPINNEKOPPE LANDBOUTAALKOMITEE Saamgestel deur die MET MEDEWERKING VAN NAVORSINGSINSTITUUT VIR DIE PLANTBESKERMING TAALDIENSBURO Departement van Landbou-tegniese Dienste VAN DIE met medewerking van die DEPARTEMENT VAN ONDERWYS, KUNS EN LANDBOUTAALKOMITEE WETENSKAP van die Taaldiensburo 1959 1963 BUTTERFLY LIST Common Names of Insects COMPILED BY THE INCLUDING TICKS, MITES, EELWORMS AGRICULTURAL TERMINOLOGY AND SPIDERS COMMITTEE Compiled by the IN COLLABORATION WiTH PLANT PROTECTION RESEARCH THE INSTITUTE LANGUAGE SERVICES BUREAU Department of Agricultural Technical Services OF THE in collaboration with the DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, ARTS AND AGRICULTURAL TERMINOLOGY SCIENCE COMMITTEE DIE STAATSDRUKKER + PRETORIA + THE of the Language Service Bureau GOVERNMENT PRINTER 1963 1959 Rekenaarmatig en leksikografies herverwerk deur PJ Taljaard e-mail enquiries: [email protected] EXPLANATORY NOTES 1 The list was alphabetised electronically. 2 On the target-language side, ie to the right of the :, synonyms are separated by a comma, e.g.: fission: klowing, splyting The sequence of the translated terms does NOT indicate any preference. Preferred terms are underlined. 3 Where catchwords of similar form are used as different parts of speech and confusion may therefore
    [Show full text]
  • OBCL Newsletter, December, 2020 (Pdf)
    December 2020 OBCL Newsletter Overseas Biological Control Laboratories Edited by Michael Grodowitz U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service Previous newsletter editions are available at: In This Issue www.ars-ebcl.org Introduction ...............................................................................................1 ABCL - Australia ......................................................................................1 Australian Biological Control Aquatic Weed Biological Control and COVID................................. 1 Trichilogaster Bud Gall Wasp: A Priority Biocontrol Agent for Laboratory - ABCL Earleaf Acacia.................................................................................... 2 Aquatic Weed Biological Control and COVID Sino-ABCL - China.................................................................................... 4 Matthew Purcell, Nathan Harms and Bradley Salivary Gland Secretome Analysis Reveals A Novel Mechanism of Horizontal Gene Transfer in the Brown Marmorated Stink Bug ...... 4 Brown FuEDEI - Argentina................................................................................... 5 Little Fire Ant ...................................................................................5 Much of the exploration for biological control of Improving the Success and Perception of Biological Control Through aquatic weeds conducted by ABCL has been performed Community Engagement and Awareness.......................................... 6 in the Asian native range of several invasive
    [Show full text]
  • INFESTATIONS by the BAGWORMS Metisa Plana and Pteroma
    JOURNALJournal of OF Oil OIL Palm PALM Research RESEARCH Vol. 23 ( A23UGUST August 2011) 2011 p. 1040-1050 INFESTATIONS BY THE BAGWORMS Metisa plana AND Pteroma pendula FOR THE PERIOD 1986-2000 IN MAJOR OIL PALM ESTATES MANAGED BY GOLDEN HOPE PLANTATION BERHAD IN PENINSULAR MALAYSIA HO CHENG TUCK*; YUSOF IBRAHIM* and KHOO KHAY CHONG* ABSTRACT Metisa plana Walker and Pteroma pendula Joannis are important pests of the oil palm, Elaeis guineensis Jacquin, which is the primary agricultural crop in Malaysia. Although there is a history of integrated management of the bagworms, information gaps exist with regard to their incidence, biology, dispersion and population dynamics. Such new information is needed to improve the current integrated management of these pests. Analysis of historical records of bagworm infestations over 63 955 ha of oil palm in 69 estates in Peninsular Malaysia showed M. plana and P. pendula to be the primary pests. Infestations were of single or mixed species, and ranged from nil to 7811 ha yr-1. Cumulative infestations were 18 297 ha, 4904 ha and 14 607 ha for single species of P. pendula and M. plana, and for mixed species of P. pendula and M. plana, respectively. This shows P. pendula to be the predominant species, and is attributed to its ability to survive very wet weather (>200 mm rain per month) and its propensity to balloon compared to M. plana, which is predisposed to wash-off by rain. Keywords: bagworms, historical data, incidence of infestation, outbreaks, oil palm. Date received: 18 March 2010; Sent for revision: 18 May 2010; Received in final form: 15 November 2010; Accepted: 19 April 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • South Africa
    Forestry Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Forest Health & Biosecurity Working Papers OVERVIEW OF FOREST PESTS SOUTH AFRICA January 2007 (Last update: July 2007) Forest Resources Development Service Working Paper FBS/30E Forest Management Division FAO, Rome, Italy Forestry Department Overview of forest pests - South Africa DISCLAIMER The aim of this document is to give an overview of the forest pest1 situation in South Africa. It is not intended to be a comprehensive review. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. © FAO 2007 1 Pest: Any species, strain or biotype of plant, animal or pathogenic agent injurious to plants or plant products (FAO, 2004). ii Overview of forest pests - South Africa TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction..................................................................................................................... 1 Forest pests...................................................................................................................... 1 Naturally regenerating forests..................................................................................... 1 Insects ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Status of Seedling Establishment Pests of Acacia Mearnsii De Wild
    Research Articles South African Journal of Science 103, March/April 2007 141 Status of seedling establishment pests of Acacia mearnsii De Wild. (Mimosaceae) in South Africa Prem Govender feeders, seed insects, wood borers, shoot borers, bark feeders and root feeders) and belong to the orders Coleoptera (46.1%), There are about 106 690 ha of Acacia mearnsii (wattle) plantations Lepidoptera (35.7%), Hemiptera (11.8%), Isoptera (3.6%), in South Africa. Wattle was previously grown mainly for the Psocoptera (1.4%), Orthoptera (0.9%) and Thysanoptera (0.5%). commercial potential of its bark (a source of tannin extract) but is All the insect pests that damage wattle in South Africa are indige- now also managed on a short rotation for pulpwood. Clear-felled nous. Most of them had a low pest status before colonizing and sites are continually being regenerated. Although considerable exploiting the rich resource provided by the exotic commercial research has been done on the post-establishment insect pests of wattle plantations. wattle, little is known about the incidence and status of seedling There is a limited availability of land and water for agriculture 5 establishment pests. Fourteen trials were planted, on previous in South Africa and commercial forestry is often in intense wattle sites, over six growing seasons from 1990/91 to 1999/00. competition with other agricultural crops for these valuable resources. To maximize yields in a limited area, there has been a Seedlings were evaluated monthly after planting for one year. 6 Stressed, damaged and dead seedlings were uprooted and inspected corresponding shift from extensive to intensive silviculture of wattle, hence a renewed interest in the management of wattle to determine the cause of death.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Invertebrate Pests in the Re-Establishment of Plantations In
    Soil invertebrate pests in the re-establishment of pl antations in South Africa by Pramanathan Govender Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Philosophiae Doctor in the Faculty ofNatural and Agricultural Sciences Department of Zoology & Entomology University of Pretoria Pretoria November 2002 AC KNOWLEDGEMENTS To my Heavenly Father for His grace during this demanding period. I wish to thank the following persons and organisations: • Prof. Clarke Scholtz for reviewing the manuscripts, supervising this study and providing guidance and encouragement. • Prof. Chris Chimimba for his encouragement and constructive comments which, 'kick stmied' my brain when it froze. • Prof G. P. Y. Clarke (University of Natal) for valuable discussions and help with statistical analysis. • Prof. Mike Wingfield for his active involvement in developing and documenting a plan for Forest Entomology in South Africa. • The Institute for Commercial Forestry Research (University of Natal) and its patron Forestry Companies for supporting the bulk of this work, while two trials were supported by the Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (University of Pretoria). • The late Dr. Peter Atkinson for initiating the insecticide trials on whitegrubs, that stimulated my interest in soil invertebrate pests. • The numerous forestry personnel and their field staff who assisted with the planting and maintenance of trials, and the forestry companies for allowing trials to be planted on their land. • Miss Vuyo Ntiyantiya for assistance with capturing the data on ascii files. • Mrs Vani Govender for assistance with capturing all the data for analysis and creating a reference database. • My wife, Vani, and children, Tenushlca, Lerissa and Theolan for allowing me 'space', sacrificing a normal lifestyle during the write-up of this thesis, and for their continued support during this period.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiple-Species Introductions of Biological Control Agents Against Weeds: Look Before You Leap
    Multiple-species introductions of biological control agents against weeds: look before you leap F.A.C. Impson,1,2 V.C. Moran,1 C. Kleinjan,1 J.H. Hoffmann1 and J.A. Moore2 Summary Biological control practitioners have frequently debated the issues behind single vs multiple species introductions against target weeds. In the case of weed biological control, conventional wisdom is that multiple species should be used on the assumption that several species are more likely to have a greater controlling impact than a single species alone. This debate is rehearsed with reference to the biological control of four species of Australian acacias in South Africa: long-leaved wattle (Acacia longifolia (Andr.) Willd.), golden wattle (Acacia pycnantha Benth.), Port Jackson willow (Acacia saligna (Labill.) H. Wendl.) and rooikrans (Acacia cyclops A. Cunn. ex G. Don), where the impacts of both gall-forming and seed-reducing agents were intended to be additive and possibly synergistic. Evaluation and observations of these specific cases show that multiple-species introductions can be beneficial, but in at least one case (A. cyclops), the wisdom of these releases is questionable and po- tentially even detrimental. This suggests the need for extreme caution when planning multiple-species introductions against a target weed species. Keywords: multiple species, Acacia, biological control. Introduction non-target effects (Myers, 1985; Simberloff and Stil- ing, 1996; Callaway et al., 1999; Denoth et al., 2002; For many years, biological control practitioners have Pearson and Callaway, 2005). discussed and debated the merits of releasing multi- For most weed biological control projects, the high- ple as opposed to single species of biological control est levels of ‘success’ have been achieved using mul- agents in weed control programmes.
    [Show full text]