DOCSLIB.ORG

Nonagentic Anti-Imperialism of the Twenty-First Century and the Legacy of Chavismo

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nonagentic Anti-Imperialism of the Twenty-First Century and the Legacy of Chavismo Chapman University Chapman University Digital Commons International Studies (MA) Theses Dissertations and Theses Summer 8-2020 The Origin of Usurpation and Tyranny: Nonagentic Anti- Imperialism of the Twenty-First Century and the Legacy of Chavismo Juan Bustillo Chapman University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/international_studies_theses Part of the International Relations Commons, Latin American Studies Commons, Political Theory Commons, and the Politics and Social Change Commons Recommended Citation Bustillo, Juan Andrés. "The Origin of Usurpation and Tyranny: Nonagentic Anti-Imperialism of the Twenty- First Century and the Legacy of Chavismo." Master's thesis, Chapman University, 2020. https://doi.org/ 10.36837/chapman.000173 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations and Theses at Chapman University Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in International Studies (MA) Theses by an authorized administrator of Chapman University Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Origin of Usurpation and Tyranny: Nonagentic Anti-Imperialism of the Twenty-First Century and the Legacy of Chavismo A Thesis by Juan Andrés Bustillo Chapman University Orange, CA Wilkinson College of Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in International Studies August 2020 Committee in charge: Dr. Maytha Alhassen, Ph.D., Chair Dr. Crystal Murphy, Ph.D. Dr. Tekle Woldemikael, Ph.D. The thesis of Juan Andrés Bustillo is approved. Dr. Maytha Alhassen, Ph.D., Chair Dr. Crystal Murphy, Ph.D. Dr. Tekle Woldemikael, Ph.D. July 2020 The Origin of Usurpation and Tyranny: Nonagentic Anti-Imperialism of the Twenty-First Century and the Legacy of Chavismo Copyright © 2020 by Juan Andrés Bustillo III ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This is my first acknowledgements section, so I only hope to thank all who have earned this recognition. First and foremost is my advisor, Dr. Maytha Alhassen. Her guidance and invaluable insights led me to engage critically with my work in ways I would never have considered otherwise. I often struggled to remove myself emotionally from the material, but her advice and teaching showed me that those struggles are something to embrace even in academia. I likewise owe a major debt of gratitude to Dr. Crystal Murphy, whose academic leadership and mentorship going back to my undergraduate career at Chapman has helped shape me into the student and creator I am today. The generous opportunities she has provided me with will continue to be counted among the highlights of my time as a graduate student. Dr. Tekle Woldemikael, though I only met him in my last semester, has been another source of clarity throughout this process. His course could not come at a more opportune time– his insights changed my perspectives on critical sections of the paper, leading to more than a few last-minute rewrites. This project would ultimately never have succeeded without the help and teaching of many other scholars from Wilkinson College: Dr. Sandra Alvarez, Dr. Lynn Horton, Dr. Dan McClure, and Dr. Andrea Molle. To my classmates in the MAIS program and to my friends who took the time to look over the longest paper I have ever written, a heartfelt thank you. I reserve special gratitude for the Walking for Freedom team, particularly Juan Pío Hernandez of Plan País and Carlos Enrique Macher Bárcenas of Mycrom Films, for allowing me to work as an intern on their documentary about Venezuelan refugees. The project was not only an invaluable resource academically but it continually reminded me of why I was undertaking this thesis. For that I cannot thank them enough. IV ABSTRACT The Origin of Usurpation and Tyranny: Nonagentic Anti-Imperialism of the Twenty-First Century and the Legacy of Chavismo by Juan Andrés Bustillo As Venezuela’s Chavista regime presides over the country’s descent into Latin America’s worst refugee and humanitarian crisis in modern times, a mass exodus of nearly five million Venezuelans since 2015, the rhetoric of Western anti-imperialists and the regime itself has absolved it of any responsibility for the crisis and the increasing authoritarianism that led to it by abdicating the regime's agency to act according to its own free will. This paper develops the discursive concept of nonagentic anti-imperialism, a rhetoric that effectively absolves self-declared anti-imperialist regimes, from Castro’s Cuba to Rajapaksa’s Sri Lanka, of human rights abuses and democratic erosions by arguing that these leaders had no choice but to rule with an iron fist in the face of Western imperialism. Focusing on Chavismo, this paper analyzes the steps towards Venezuela’s democratic breakdown taken by both Hugo Chávez and Nicolas Maduro, the nonagentic anti-imperialist rhetoric that deflected the true intent behind these steps, and how those steps led the country to the manufactured disaster it finds itself in today. It concludes by positing that the legitimacy of supposedly anti-imperialist policies hinges not on the fierce rhetoric surrounding them but rather on the lived ends of the people affected by them. V TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................................................... IV ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................... V LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................. VII 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................1 1.1 Literature Review ................................................................................................................2 1.2 Themes ................................................................................................................................7 2 NONAGENTIC ANTI-IMPERIALISM .................................................................................9 3 VENEZUELA 1948-1998 .......................................................................................................19 4 CHAVISMO ............................................................................................................................32 4.1 The Centralization of Power .............................................................................................45 4.2 Media Controls ..................................................................................................................47 4.3 2017 Protests .....................................................................................................................50 4.4 Civil Society Organizations Under Chavismo ..................................................................52 4.5 A Nonagentic Anti-Imperialist Foreign Policy .................................................................59 4.6 Food Shortages..................................................................................................................65 5 VENEZUELA UNDER CHAVISMO ...................................................................................68 5.1 The Economic War ...........................................................................................................76 5.2 The Kleptocrats on Top ....................................................................................................79 6 REVISITING THE RHETORIC OF NONAGENTIC ANTI-IMPERIALISM ...............86 7 EXISTING BETWEEN INVISIBILITY AND SPECTACLE ...........................................90 7.1 Rocío, From Valencia, Venezuela ....................................................................................94 7.2 Karina Torres, From Valencia, Venezuela .......................................................................99 7.3 José & De La Cruz ..........................................................................................................102 8 CONCLUSION: THE MAGICAL BOLIVARIAN STATE .............................................107 9 REFERENCES ......................................................................................................................111 VI LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS Abbreviation Meaning AD Acción Democrática (Democratic Action) AN Asamblea Nacional (National Assembly) AI Amnesty International CAP Carlos Andrés Pérez CAT Convention Against Torture CLAP Comité Local de Abastecimiento y Producción (Local Committees for Supply and Production) COPEI Comité de Organización Política Electoral Independiente (Social Democratic Party) CSIS Center for Strategic and International Studies CSO Civil Society Organization CTU Comités de Tierra Urbana (Urban Land Committees) FARC Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias Colombianas (Colombian Revolutionary Armed Forces) FEVA Federación Venezolana de Abogadas (Venezuelan Women Lawyer’s Federation) FPV El Foro Penal Venezolano GNB Guardia Nacional Bolivariana (Bolivarian National Guard) IACHR Inter-American Commission on Human Rights ICESCR International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights ICG International Crisis Group VII PSUV Partido Socialista Unido de Venezuela (United Socialist Party of Venezuela) RCTV Radio Caracas Television TPS Temporary Protected Status TSJ Tribunal Supremo de la Justicio (Supreme Tribunal of Justice) UNHCR United Nations Human Rights Council URD Unión Republicana
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Balanced Election Coverage with Media Researchers on Location
    10.1515/nor-2017-0206 Current Research Projects More Balanced Election Coverage with Media Researchers on Location TOMAS ANDERSSON ODÉN On 15 August 2004, the Bolivarian Republic of monitoring project. A group of Venezuelan students Venezuela held a referendum to decide if the current who had been trained and had participated in the president, Hugo Chávez, should remain in office un- 2004 monitoring were recruited as coders.4 til the end of his six-year term or be recalled. Be- The purpose of the 2006 monitoring project was cause of strong social tension, including friction to analyse the balance in the coverage of the presi- between Chavez and some of the private media dential election campaign, and to evaluate the meth- companies, the Atlanta-based democracy organisa- odology of the 2004 project. tion The Carter Center sent a mission to Venezuela The main question was whether there were rea- to observe the referendum. The Carter Project in- sons to assume that the increased balance in media cluded a Scandinavian media monitoring project to reporting in 2004 was due to the media monitoring assess whether election coverage in the major TV project and the weekly presentation of its results. channels’ newscasts was balanced or biased.1 The result of the media monitoring was reported each week to the media companies and to the Ven- Tension after Coup ezuelan National Electoral Council (CNE). The first Tension between the Venezuelan president and report, released on 22nd of July 2004 demonstrated some of the privately-owned TV channels was that only one of the newscasts had a relatively bal- partly due to the media’s alleged role in a coup anced election reporting while the others had a con- d’état that briefly deposed of Hugo Chávez in April siderable bias.2 One of those was state-owned chan- of 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • Venezuela: Issues for Congress, 2013-2016
    Venezuela: Issues for Congress, 2013-2016 Mark P. Sullivan Specialist in Latin American Affairs January 23, 2017 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R43239 Venezuela: Issues for Congress, 2013-2016 Summary Although historically the United States had close relations with Venezuela, a major oil supplier, friction in bilateral relations increased under the leftist, populist government of President Hugo Chávez (1999-2013), who died in 2013 after battling cancer. After Chávez’s death, Venezuela held presidential elections in which acting President Nicolás Maduro narrowly defeated Henrique Capriles of the opposition Democratic Unity Roundtable (MUD), with the opposition alleging significant irregularities. In 2014, the Maduro government violently suppressed protests and imprisoned a major opposition figure, Leopoldo López, along with others. In December 2015, the MUD initially won a two-thirds supermajority in National Assembly elections, a major defeat for the ruling United Socialist Party of Venezuela (PSUV). The Maduro government subsequently thwarted the legislature’s power by preventing three MUD representatives from taking office (denying the opposition a supermajority) and using the Supreme Court to block bills approved by the legislature. For much of 2016, opposition efforts were focused on recalling President Maduro through a national referendum, but the government slowed down the referendum process and suspended it indefinitely in October. After an appeal by Pope Francis, the government and most of the opposition (with the exception of Leopoldo López’s Popular Will party) agreed to talks mediated by the Vatican along with the former presidents of the Dominican Republic, Spain, and Panama and the head of the Union of South American Nations.
    [Show full text]
  • Law on Social Responsibility in Radio, Television, and Electronic
    Venezuela Page 1 of 5 Published on Freedom House (https://freedomhouse.org) Home > Venezuela Venezuela Country: Venezuela Year: 2016 Press Freedom Status: NF PFS Score: 80 Legal Environment: 26 Political Environment: 30 Economic Environment: 24 Overview Inhospitable conditions for press freedom continued to prevail in 2015 as the country prepared for legislative elections in December. Government officials used state media to threaten private outlets, and lawmakers with the ruling party opened defamation cases against critical journalists. Restricted access to foreign currency, crucial for purchasing newsprint, contributed to reductions in the size or frequency of some periodicals. However, compared with 2014, which featured major clashes between security forces and antigovernment demonstrators, the number of physical attacks and arbitrary detentions affecting journalists declined. Key Developments • The government refused to recognize a decision by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACHR) ordering the reinstatement of the terrestrial broadcast license of television station Radio Caracas Television (RCTV), which was taken off the air in 2007 after a highly politicized campaign against the channel by then president Hugo Chávez. https://freedomhouse.org/print/48463 1/16/2018 Venezuela Page 2 of 5 • Foreign journalists faced restrictions while attempting to cover the legislative elections, and over two dozen alleged violations of press freedom were reported on election day. Legal Environment: 26 / 30 Article 57 of Venezuela’s 1999 constitution guarantees freedom of expression, but this right is not respected in practice. Reforms to the penal code in 2005 expanded the scope of defamation as a criminal offense; when directed at the president, it can result in a prison term of up to 30 months.
    [Show full text]
  • Television in Venezuela: Who Dominates the Media? by MARK WEISBROT and TARA RUTTENBERG *
    Issue Brief December 2010 Television in Venezuela: Who Dominates the Media? BY MARK WEISBROT AND TARA RUTTENBERG * It is commonly reported in the international press, and widely believed, that the government of President Hugo Chávez controls the media in Venezuela. For example, writing about Venezuela’s September elections for the National Assembly, the Washington Post’s deputy editorial page editor and columnist, Jackson Diehl, referred to the Chávez “regime’s domination of the media...” 1 In an interview on CNN, Lucy Morillon of Reporters Without Borders stated, “President Chávez controls most of the TV stations.” 2 And on PBS in November 2010, former Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs Roger Noriega stated that the Venezuelan media is “virtually under the control of Chávez.” 3 Such statements are made regularly in the major media and almost never challenged. Table 1 shows the evolution of Venezuelan television audience share from 2000-2010. There are three categories: private broadcast channels, which are privately owned and available on broadcast television without payment; the state channels, which are run by the government and also broadcast, without payment 4 by the viewer; and private paid TV, which includes cable and satellite, for which the subscriber must pay a fee; and other paid programming that is being watched during the time of the survey. As can be seen from the table, as of September 2010, Venezuelan state TV channels had just a 5.4 percent audience share. Of the other 94.6 percent of the audience, 61.4 percent were watching privately owned television channels, and 33.1 percent were watching paid TV.
    [Show full text]
  • Televisión Del Estado, Comercial Y Comunitaria En Venezuela: La Lucha Por El
    Televisión del Estado, comercial y comunitaria en Venezuela: la lucha por el poder y consumo mediático José Miguel Gámez Pérez – Doctorando Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona. Resumen El artículo se centra en el pluralismo y la concentración mediática en Venezuela, donde los debates sobre la comunicación presumen la falta de democracia. Se intenta entender la estructura y el funcionamiento de los medios, en específico de la televisión y sus patrones de consumo mediático, profundizando en cómo se clasifica y qué rol tiene en una sociedad orientada políticamente hacia el Socialismo del siglo XXI o en contra del postcapitalismo-neoliberal, la cual de seguro es de difícil comprensión en otros sistemas políticos. El texto realiza un análisis metodológico cualitativo de carácter documental y transdisciplinario, enfocado en las dimensiones económica, política, legal y tecnológica, de los modelos de concentración a menores escalas y sus implicaciones económicas y políticas. También describe desde una perspectiva técnica, la clasificación de la televisión en Venezuela: pública y comercial (privada), de las cuales la pública a su vez se divide en TV del Estado y Comunitaria; no obstante todas, incluyendo la TV comercial de estricto carácter capitalista, están sujetas a una nueva regulación nacional que garantiza el cumplimiento de la misión social. Vale destacar que los medios públicos se asocian con el Gobierno por recibir en muchos casos las concesiones y subsidios, lo cual porcentualmente aparecería como una tendencia al monopolio del Estado,
    [Show full text]
  • Download [Pdf]
    Working PaperEuropean No. 65 Research Centre for Anti-Corruption and State-Building Hertie School of Governance Working Paper No. 65 Backsliding on Good Governance: the Venezuelan case Ana C. Pérez ERCAS WORKING PAPERS COLLECTION WORKING PAPERS ERCAS Berlin, December 2020 www.againstcorruption.eu 1 Working Paper No. 65 Working Paper No. 65 Introduction During the last 10 years, Venezuela has experienced a stark regression on its road to good governance, performing negatively in most indicators. Such backsliding can be attributed to the poor governance the country has undergone during its current administration, as well as due to falling oil prices worldwide which has severely damaged the country’s single‐commodity-centered economy. A number of corrupt and anti‐democratic processes have also led to this negative transition, that instead of pushing forward the once regional leader, has only pushed it backward. Across this essay, we aim to analyze, through a historical summary of the past 20 years using a process-tracing methodology, the main events in Venezuela that have led to the deterioration of the country’s good governance indicators. Hugo Chávez Frías (2001 - 2013) First Term (2001 – 2007) In 1999 during the first months of Hugo Chávez’s presidency, he proposed a constituent assembly to change the Constitution. Through this, the nation’s Congress, previously consisting of the Senate and the Chamber of Deputies, was dissolved. Once passed, these powers were merged into a newly created National Assembly. It is worth noting that the make- up of the constituent assembly working towards the writing of the new constitution was not proportional to the popular vote, giving them an over-representation to the officialism which gained 95% of the seats with just 60% of the votes, while the opposition achieved only 4 seats even after having 38% of the votes (Monsalve, 2011; Lucca, 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Venezuela After Chavez
    Edited by Veronica Zubillaga George Ciccariello-Maher Rebecca Hanson Boris Muñoz Robert Samet Naomi Schiller David Smilde Alejandro Velasco Veronica Zubillaga April 30th, 2014 1 Introduction Venezuela after Chávez: Challenges of Democracy, Security and Governance April 30, 2014 Center for Latin American and Caribbean Studies Watson Institute for International Studies Brown University The death of President Hugo Chávez on March 2013 has raised pressing questions about the future of Venezuela and the continuity of Chávez’s Bolivarian project. Nicolás Maduro, Chávez’s hand-picked successor, won elections in April 2013 with a very narrow electoral victory that aroused serious suspicion of fraud amidst the opposition and intense tensions among Venezuelans. Nine months later, in February 2014, Venezuelans experienced a burst of massive students protests in different states, which immediately spread to middle-classes neighborhoods of the emboldened opposition. While we were organizing the Venezuela conference at Brown, in Caracas some middle-class neighborhoods were taken and blocked by “vecinos” (neighbors); students kept taking to the streets protesting while excessively repressive and militarized police responses reheated the students’ rage. The protest’s focused on a vast range of claims: from freedom of speech, citizen security, food shortages; inflation; freedom for those imprisoned for political motives since the beginning of the protests; government repression, up to Maduro’s immediate resignation. The landscape resembled a war zone in one part of the city yet was amazingly calm in other parts. Social polarization was evident and finding out the reasons why people in barrios were not protesting is one of the questions posed here.
    [Show full text]
  • Venezuela -- Chavez Moves to Silence Opposition Media
    UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO 3 August 2009 Open!Source!Center Analysis Venezuela -- Chavez Moves to Silence Opposition Media President Chavez's government is moving forcefully to silence critics by introducing a Media Crimes bill that would give it sweeping authority to jail journalists, media executives, and bloggers who report on anything that the government considers to be harmful to state interests. It is simultaneously moving to shut down more than 200 radio stations, impose broadcasting requirements on RCTV International, and position itself to take over opposition news station Globovision. Tightening control over opposition outlets could make it more difficult for Chavez to blame his favored scapegoat of the media for the country's problems, however. Introduced at the National Assembly by Prosecutor General Luisa Ortega, the Media Crimes bill significantly expands the government's ability to punish media critics for any action or omission that it finds objectionable. ! The bill makes it illegal to report on anything deemed "harmful to public mental or moral health" or to "the interests of the state," or anything that would "incite violence" or "create panic." It also penalizes outlets for not reporting on events or situations that would violate "the people's right to information." The bill targets journalists, media executives, and even bloggers. ! Unlike the Radio and Television Social Responsibility Law, under which stations can be fined or lose their broadcast license, the new bill sets prison sentences of six months to four years for violations, and also applies to print media. Outlets with convicted workers or owners cannot comment on the conviction in any fashion beyond posting a notice (Noticias24.com, 30 July).1 ! The bill is almost certainly targeted at the government's long-standing media critics.
    [Show full text]
  • Luisiana Ríos and Others Vs. the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela Case 12.441 (The “RCTV” Case)
    INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS -------------------------------------------------------------------- x : Luisiana Ríos and others : : vs. : : : The Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela : : Case 12.441 (The “RCTV” Case) : : -------------------------------------------------------------------- x BRIEF OF THE ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK AS AMICUS CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONERS LUISIANA RÍOS AND OTHERS IN THE “RCTV” CASE ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK Of Counsel: 42 West 44th Street New York, New York 10036 DEBEVOISE & PLIMPTON LLP United States of America 919 Third Avenue (212) 382-6600 New York, New York 10022 United States of America David McCraw, Chair of the Committee (212) 909-6000 on Communications and Media Law Jeremy Feigelson Amicus Curiae Erik Christopher Bierbauer Lawrence J. Lee Catherine M. Doll Michael Howe Dated: New York, New York July 31, 2008 22789352v1 Table of Contents Page Preliminary Statement......................................................................................................................2 Statement of Interest ........................................................................................................................4 Statement of Facts............................................................................................................................6 A. Venezuela’s Actions to Injure and Suppress RCTV and its Employees ..........................6 1. Statements Generating Public Hostility to RCTV and its Personnel.......................7 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Notiz Venezuela: Colectivos (31.07.2020)
    Eidgenössisches Justiz- und Polizeidepartement EJPD Staatssekretariat für Migration SEM Sektion Analysen Öffentlich Bern-Wabern, 31. Juli 2020 Notiz Venezuela Colectivos Öffentlich Inhaltsverzeichnis Fragestellung ....................................................................................................................... 3 Kernaussage ........................................................................................................................ 3 Main findings........................................................................................................................ 3 1. Kontext ................................................................................................................... 4 2. Quellenlage ............................................................................................................. 5 3. Terminologie .......................................................................................................... 6 4. Typologie ................................................................................................................ 7 5. Gebiete unter Kontrolle der Colectivos ................................................................ 9 6. Auftreten ............................................................................................................... 12 7. Betroffene Bevölkerungsgruppen ....................................................................... 12 8. Beziehungen zum venezolanischen Staat .........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL DRAFT State and Power After Neoliberalism in Bolivarian
    UC Santa Cruz UC Santa Cruz Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title State and Power after Neoliberalism in Bolivarian Venezuela Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/86g3m849 Author Kingsbury, Donald V. Publication Date 2012 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ STATE AND POWER AFTER NEOLIBERALISM IN BOLIVARIAN VENEZUELA A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in POLITICS with emphases in LATIN AMERICAN AND LATINO STUDIES and HISTORY OF CONSCIOUSNESS by Donald V. Kingsbury June 2012 The Dissertation of Donald V. Kingsbury is approved: ____________________________________ Professor Megan Thomas, Chair ____________________________________ Professor Juan Poblete ____________________________________ Professor Gopal Balakrishnan ____________________________________ Professor Michael Urban _________________________ Tyrus Miller Vice Provost and Dean of Graduate Studies Copyright © by Donald V. Kingsbury 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures iv Abstract v Acknowledgments vi I. Introduction 1 II. Between Multitude and Pueblo 53 III. The Problem with Populism 120 IV. The Power of the Many 169 V. The Discursive Production of a ‘Revolution’ 219 VI. ‘…after Neoliberalism?’ 277 VII. Conclusion 342 VIII. Bibliography 362 ! """! LIST OF FIGURES Figure 0.1 Seven Presidential elections and four referenda during the Bolivarian Revolution, 1998-2010. 18 Figure 1.1 "Every 11th has its 13th: The Pueblo is still on the street, but today it’s on the road to socialism!" 102 Figure 3.1 “Here comes the People’s Capitalism” 201 Figure 4.1: Advertisement of ‘Mi Negra’ Program 221 Figure 4.2 ¡Rumbo al Socialismo Bolivariano! 261 Figure 4.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Security in Caracas: the Collective Action of Foundation Alexis Vive
    COMMUNITY SECURITY IN CARACAS: THE COLLECTIVE ACTION OF FOUNDATION ALEXIS VIVE A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Latin American Studies By Jonathan Weinstock, B.A. Washington, DC August 25, 2015 Copyright 2015 by Jonathan Weinstock All Rights Reserved ii COMMUNITY SECURITY IN CARACAS: THE COLLECTIVE ACTION OF FOUNDATION ALEXIS VIVE Jonathan Weinstock, B.A. Thesis Advisor: Marc W Chernick, Ph.D. ABSTRACT This thesis is divided into two arguments. The first part is an argument for community security: a community-based vision of human security, which conflates development and personal security. Social movements then animate community security, addressing local problems and creating endogenous solutions. Arturo Escobar’s work on post-development theory and Raúl Zibechi’s new social movements as territories in resistance best explains this phenomenon. At the community level, I utilize Stephen Schneider’s work on community crime prevention and organic mobilization as complex and difficult to maintain. With this lens, I establish an analytical framework for community security movements based on the themes of identity, praxis, constituency and autonomy. Examinations on gender relations, networks, violence and production are also weaved into the analysis. The second part is an argument that a Caracas (Venezuela) based group is a community security movement and that this analytical framework is best fitted for understanding them. Though Caracas is among the most insecure and politically turbulent cities in Latin America, small pockets of peace exist in working class neighborhoods.
    [Show full text]