Firearms Evidence

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Firearms Evidence Case 1:14-cr-00107-RCL Document 847 Filed 06/25/18 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA United States of America ) ) ) Criminal No. 14-107 (RCL) v. ) ) Nicholas A. Slatten, ) ) Defendant. ) DEFENDANT’S OPPOSITION TO GOVERNMENT’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE DEFENDANT’S PROFFERED EXPERT TESTIMONY The government’s motion to preclude Mr. Slatten’s proffered expert testimony is uniformly without merit. The opinions of Mr. Slatten’s firearms expert regarding the sounds produced by various rifles are reliable, relevant, and will be helpful to the jurors, who will lack knowledge of the sounds produced by military-grade rifles. The government’s argument that Mr. Slatten has failed to disclose the bases and reasons for the opinions of his ballistics expert is meritless, as Mr. Slatten’s expert reached the very same opinions and provided the very same reasons as the government’s own ballistics expert. And the government’s argument that Mr. Slatten has not adequately identified the bases and reasons for the opinions of his memory expert is nothing more than a complaint that his expert has written too many relevant publications on the subject matter of her testimony. The government’s motion should be denied. Case 1:14-cr-00107-RCL Document 847 Filed 06/25/18 Page 2 of 16 BACKGROUND On May 21, 2018, the defense disclosed to the government the following three expert opinions.1 A. Michael Green Michael Green is a firearms expert with over thirty years of experience in this field. Mr. Green began his career in the U.S. Army, where he completed Airborne School, Ranger School, and the Special Forces Qualification Course. He spent fifteen years in the Special Forces. Currently, Mr. Green serves as an Antiterrorism/Force Protection Specialist within a Department of Defense agency. He also owns a firearms training company. Mr. Green has been teaching tactical firearms training since 1992. A more detailed summary of Mr. Green’s qualifications is set forth in his expert disclosure and attached biography. See Ex. A at 1-2. As described in more detail in the defense’s expert disclosure, Mr. Green observed the firing of both an SR-25 and an M-4, during which contemporaneous recordings were made. (Those recordings were produced to the government on May 23.)2 The SR-25 (which is the type of rifle that Mr. Slatten had on September 16, 2007) was fired from (1) “inside a Bearcat out of one of the firing portals” and (2) “outside from the turret of a Bearcat.” Ex. A at 2. The M-4 (the type of rifle that Paul Slough had on September 16, 2007) was fired “outside from the turret of a Bearcat.” Id. Mr. Green listened to the rifle shots from atop a separate vehicle approximately 10 meters away, while wearing Peltors (a form of hearing protection). Id. 1 The due date for the defense’s expert disclosure in the scheduling order was May 18, but the parties agreed to extend the due date to May 21. 2 The government states in its motion that the defense produced only two recordings on May 23. ECF No. 810 at 2. That is incorrect. The defense produced .wav recordings of all three rifle shots discussed in Mr. Green’s disclosure on May 23. See Ex. B. 2 Case 1:14-cr-00107-RCL Document 847 Filed 06/25/18 Page 3 of 16 Mr. Green is prepared to offer the following two expert opinions. First, “[a]n SR-25 fired from inside an armored Bearcat through one of its portals sounds like an SR-25 fired from outside an armored Bearcat when the listener is wearing hearing protection atop a separate vehicle.” Id. at 2. Mr. Green will opine that “[a]n individual located on a separate vehicle from the Bearcat and wearing hearing protection would not be able to distinguish between the sounds accurately.” Id. at 3. He may also testify that the difficulty of distinguishing the sounds “would be significantly increased by a variety of factors,” such as the direction the individual is facing, the distance between the individual and the rifles, the ambient noise, and the level of hearing protection. Id. Second, “[a]n SR-25 sounds like an M-4 fired on semiautomatic mode when the listener is wearing hearing protection atop a separate vehicle.” Id. As with the first opinion, he will opine that “[a]n individual located on a separate vehicle and wearing hearing protection would not be able to distinguish between the sounds accurately” and that the difficulty of distinguishing the sounds would be increased by the factors set forth above. Id. B. Liam Hendrikse Liam Hendrikse has over a decade of experience as a ballistics and firearms specialist. He obtained his Master’s Degree in Forensic Science from King’s College in London and was previously a Forensic Scientist with the Forensic Science Service in the United Kingdom. He has served as a lecturer, trainer, and course designer designing modules and lectures specific to the forensic examination of firearms. Since 2010, he has served as a registered expert in firearms and ballistics for the International Criminal Court. He also serves on a panel of expert witnesses in firearms for the County of Los Angeles Superior Court. A more detailed summary of Mr. Hendrikse’s qualifications is set forth in his expert disclosure and attached CV. See Ex. A at 3-4. Mr. Hendrikse examined two pieces of physical evidence in the possession of the government: a bullet jacket fragment in the white Kia steering wheel (item Q90.1) and a bullet 3 Case 1:14-cr-00107-RCL Document 847 Filed 06/25/18 Page 4 of 16 jacket fragment found in the white Kia (item Q121). Based on his education, training, and experience, he reached the following opinions: 1. The bullet core fragment (identified by the government as Q90.1) in the White Kia steering wheel is consistent with a steel penetrator tip that is found in the M- 855 cartridge and consistent with a 5.56mm caliber bullet. Mr. Hendrikse may testify that the steel penetrator found in the steering wheel of the White Kia is consistent with a 5.56mm caliber bullet. Mr. Hendrikse may also testify that two possible firearms which fire a 5.56mm caliber bullet are the M-4 and/or the M-249. Mr. Hendrikse may also testify that an SR-25 sniper rifle does not fire a 5.56mm caliber bullet. 2. The bullet jacket fragment (identified by the government as Q.121) found in the White Kia exhibit no marks of value for comparison purposes. Mr. Hendrikse may opine that the bullet jacket fragment found in the White Kia is from a conventional projectile but because of the size and condition of the fragment, it exhibits insufficient marks of value for comparison purposes. Ex. A at 4-5. Importantly, Mr. Hendrikse’s opinions regarding this evidence are identical to the opinions reached by the government’s own expert, Brandon Giroux. Before the prior trial, the government disclosed that it intended to call Brandon Giroux as an expert in firearms and toolmark identification and comparison. See Ex. C at 3. As relevant here, the government’s disclosure stated that Mr. Giroux would testify that “Q90” is “consistent with steel penetrator tips found in Q231 through Q250 (i.e., 5.56mm cartridges)” and that “Q121” is “consistent with bullet fragments or bullet jacket fragments.” Id. at 4. Attached to the government’s disclosure were Mr. Giroux’s lab reports, but those reports did not disclose any additional information about how he reached those opinions. See id. at 38, 55. Mr. Giroux offered this testimony at trial. See 8/14/07 (AM) at 83:4-84:5; 8/14/07 (PM) at 60:8-24; see also Ex. E. The amount of detail in Mr. Hendrikse’s original disclosure was virtually identical to that in Mr. Giroux’s disclosure reaching the same opinions. Attached hereto as Exhibit D is a chart comparing Mr. Hendrikse’s original disclosure to Mr. Giroux’s disclosure. Nevertheless, the 4 Case 1:14-cr-00107-RCL Document 847 Filed 06/25/18 Page 5 of 16 government insisted that the disclosure “does not satisfy Rule 16 and does not allow the government to prepare for his testimony” and asked the defense to explain “why” Mr. Hendrikse reached his opinions. Ex. F at 2. In response, the defense supplemented Mr. Hendrikse’s disclosure to provide even more information than the government had provided in Mr. Giroux’s earlier disclosure. In a May 30 supplement, the defense stated that, with respect to the bullet core fragment found in the steering wheel (Q90.1): Mr. Hendrikse’s analysis considered the dimensions and material of the bullet core fragment. Based on class characteristics, the bullet core fragment could be excluded as having been fired from an SR-25 barrel. Based on Mr. Hendrikse’s past analysis of and familiarity with the 5.56mm caliber bullet and M-855 cartridge [SS109 cartridge], Mr. Hendrikse concluded that the bullet core fragment is consistent with a steel penetrator tip that is found in the M-855 cartridge and consistent with a 5.56mm caliber bullet. Ex. G at 4. With respect to the bullet jacket fragment identified as Q121, the defense added: Mr. Hendrikse reviewed the bullet jacket fragment (Q121) and was unable to identify any representative lands and grooves. Based on the lack of these identifying characteristics, Mr. Hendrikse could not identify anything resembling a rifling profile which would ordinarily be the basis for subsequent comparison (class characteristics).
Recommended publications
  • Building a Secure Workforce
    Federal Government Services Building a Secure Workforce Guard against insider threat Michael G. Gelles David L. Brant Brian Geffert Building a Secure Workforce Guard Against Insider Threat Table of Contents Introduction 1 Asset Loss and Insider Threat Defined 2 Other Potential Results of Asset Loss Caused by Insider Threats 3 Understanding the Insider Threat 4 Summary of Findings: Insider Threat 4 Risk Indicators and Characteristics 5 Competing Loyalties 5 Risk of Increased Computing and Networking 6 Risk of Public Information in Private Hands 6 Mitigating Asset Loss: A Series of Interventions and Action Plans 7 Establishing a Workforce Culture to Mitigate Risk 7 The Employee Assistance Program (EAP) a Tactical Mitigation Strategy 8 The Workforce as a Monitor: “Operationalizing” Security Awareness Training 8 Leveraging Human Resources as a Risk Mitigator 9 Risk Management Through Information Access Management 9 Case Reviews 10 Project Initiation 10 Establish a Baseline: The “As-Is State” 10 Case Sampling and Methodology for Review 10 Conduct a Gap Analysis and Profile the “To-Be State” 10 Recommendations for Future Study and Change 11 Appendix A 12 Enterprise Risk Framework and the Insider Threat 12 Risk Equation 13 Appendix B 14 Information Management Framework and the Insider Threat 14 References 16 Contacts 17 i Building a Secure Workforce Guard Against Insider Threat Introduction In today’s evolving and changing global environment, business in the public sector is increasingly more challenging. There is an ongoing need to adapt a more balanced and integrated approach to protecting information and other assets. As the world becomes a virtual community of competitors and predators, an organization’s assets are at greater risk than in the past, when the world was more localized, compartmentalized, and siloed.
    [Show full text]
  • CFI-Annual-Report-2018.Pdf
    Message from the President and CEO Last year was another banner year for the Center the interests of people who embrace reason, for Inquiry. We worked our secular magic in a science, and humanism—the principles of the vast variety of ways: from saving lives of secular Enlightenment. activists around the world who are threatened It is no secret that these powerful ideas like with violence and persecution to taking the no others have advanced humankind by nation’s largest drugstore chain, CVS, to court unlocking human potential, promoting goodness, for marketing homeopathic snake oil as if it’s real and exposing the true nature of reality. If you medicine. are looking for humanity’s true salvation, CFI stands up for reason and science in a way no look no further. other organization in the country does, because This past year we sought to export those ideas to we promote secular and humanist values as well places where they have yet to penetrate. as scientific skepticism and critical thinking. The Translations Project has taken the influential But you likely already know that if you are reading evolutionary biology and atheism books of this report, as it is designed with our supporters in Richard Dawkins and translated them into four mind. We want you not only to be informed about languages dominant in the Muslim world: Arabic, where your investment is going; we want you to Urdu, Indonesian, and Farsi. They are available for take pride in what we have achieved together. free download on a special website. It is just one When I meet people who are not familiar with CFI, of many such projects aimed at educating people they often ask what it is we do.
    [Show full text]
  • National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) Office of Inspector General (OIG) Work Plan for Fiscal Years 2007-2012
    Description of document: National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) Office of Inspector General (OIG) Work Plan for Fiscal Years 2007-2012 Requested date: 25-May-2012 Released date: 29-September-2017 Posted date: 16-October-2017 Source of document: FOIA Request National Reconnaissance Office OCIO/Information Review and Release Group 14675 Lee Road Chantilly, VA 20151-1715 Fax: 703-227-9198 Online FOIA Request Form Email: [email protected] The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website. NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE 14675 Lee Road Chantilly, VA 20151-1715 29 September 2017 REF: FOIA Case F12-0103 This is in response to your request dated 25 May 2012 and received in the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) on 5 June 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • American Intelligence Journal Vol 34
    AMERICAN INTELLIGENCE JOURNAL THE MAGAZINE FOR INTELLIGENCE PROFESSIONALS The Cyber Threat: The Future of Intelligence in a Wired World __NMIF__________________________ Vol. 34, No. 1, 2017 American THE MAGAZINE FOR INTELLIGENCE PROFESSIONALS Intelligence Journal Vol. 34, No. 1 2017 ISSN 0883-072X NMIF Board of Directors LTG (USA, Ret) Mary A. Legere, Chair Col (USAF, Ret) John Clark, President Col (USAF, Ret) William Arnold, Vice President Col (USAF, Ret) Michael Grebb, Treasurer Col (USAF, Ret) Carla Bass, Director LTC (USA, Ret) Steve Iwicki, Director Mr. Don Bolser, Director Dr. (Col, USAF, Ret) Eva S. Jenkins CDR (USNR, Ret) Calland Carnes, Director Capt (USNR, Ret) Stephanie Leung, Director Mr. Dennis DeMolet, Director Kel McClanahan, Esq., Director Lt Col (USAF, Ret) James Eden, Director Brad Moss, Esq., Director COL (USA, Ret) Michael Ferguson, Director Capt (USNR) Rick Myllenbeck, Director Col (USAF, Ret) Owen Greenblatt CDR (USNR) Louis Tucker, Director COL (USA, Ret) David Hale, Director COL (USA, Ret) Gerald York, Director Editor - COL (USA, Ret) William C. Spracher, Ed.D. Production Manager - Ms. Debra Hamby-Davis Brig Gen (USAF, Ret) Scott Bethel, Director Emeritus Dr. Forrest R. Frank, Director Emeritus MajGen (USMC, Ret) Michael Ennis, Director Emeritus LTG (USA, Ret) Patrick M. Hughes, Director Emeritus Col (USAF, Ret) William Huntington, Director Emeritus The American Intelligence Journal (AIJ) is published by the National Military Intelligence Foundation (NMIF), a non-profit, non-political foundation supporting American intelligence professionals and the U.S. Intelligence Community, primarily through educational means. NMIF believes in the power of the intelligence mission to inspire young people to join the intelligence profession as a career of service to the nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Debate on Science Issues Myths of Child Psychology
    Superbug Crisis | Ten Tactics for Skepticism | Claims of Chi | Fake Bomb Detectors the Magazine for Science and Reason Vol. 41 No. 1 | January/February 2017 Public Debate on Project Science Greenglow Issues Creationism Myths of in Europe Child Psychology Doubt and American Fears Uncertainty Survey INTRODUCTORY PRICE U.S. and Canada $5.99 Skepticism Is Nonpartisan Published by the Center for Inquiry in association with the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry Robyn E. Blumner, CEO Massimo Polidoro, Research Fellow Bar ry Karr, Ex ec u tive Di rect or Benjamin Radford, Research Fellow Joe Nickell, Senior Research Fellow Richard Wiseman, Research Fellow www.csicop.org Fellows James E. Al cock*, psy chol o gist, York Univ., Tor on to Mur ray Gell-Mann, pro fes sor of phys ics, San ta Fe In sti tute; Harvard Univ., Cambridge, MA Mar cia An gell, MD, former ed i tor-in-chief, No bel lau re ate Lor en Pan kratz, psy chol o gist, Or e gon Health New Eng land Jour nal of Med i cine Thom as Gi lov ich, psy chol o gist, Cor nell Univ. Sci en ces Univ. Kimball Atwood IV, MD, physician; author; Newton, MA David H. Gorski, cancer surgeon and re searcher at Barbara Robert L. Park, professor of physics, Univ. of Maryland Steph en Bar rett, MD, psy chi a trist; au thor; con sum er ad vo cate, Ann Kar manos Cancer Institute and chief of breast surgery Jay M. Pasachoff, Field Memorial Professor of Al len town, PA section, Wayne State University School of Medicine.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Law Reform Commission
    Keeping Secrets REPORT The Protection of Classified and Security Sensitive Information REPORT 98 May 2004 © Commonwealth of Australia 2004 This work is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in whole or part, subject to acknowledgement of the source, for your personal, non- commercial use or use within your organisation. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, all other rights are reserved. Requests for further authorisation should be directed to the Commonwealth Copyright Administration, Intellectual Property Branch, Department of Communications, Information Technology and the Arts, GPO Box 2154, Canberra ACT 2601 or by email to [email protected]. ISBN 0-9750600-5-8 Commission Reference: ALRC 98 The Australian Law Reform Commission was established on 1 January 1975 by the Law Reform Commission Act 1973 and reconstituted by the Australian Law Reform Commission Act 1996. The office of the ALRC is at Level 25, 135 King Street, Sydney NSW 2000, Australia. Telephone: within Australia (02) 8238 6333 International +61 2 8238 6333 TTY: (02) 8238 6379 Facsimile: within Australia (02) 8238 6363 International +61 2 8238 6363 E-mail: [email protected] ALRC homepage: www.alrc.gov.au Printed by The SOS Printing Group (Australia) Pty Ltd The Hon Philip Ruddock MP Attorney-General of Australia Suite MF 21 Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 31 May 2004 Dear Attorney-General, The Protection of Classified and Security Sensitive Information On 2 April 2003, the Commission received a reference from the then Attorney- General, the Hon Daryl Williams AM QC MP, pursuant to the Australian Law Reform Commission Act 1996, to undertake a review of the handling and protection of classified and security sensitive information in legal proceedings.
    [Show full text]
  • "Goodness Without Godness", with Professor Phil Zuckerman
    Newsletter of the Humanist Society of Santa Barbara www.santabarbarahumanists.org JULY 2019 Join Us for the July Speaker Meeting at Valle Verde: Gun Violence: A Public Health Crisis The tragic problem of gun violence is not a political issue but a public health concern of epidemic proportions. Nearly 40,000 people died from gun violence in the U.S. in 2018, two thirds of them from suicide. This was the highest level of gun violence in 20 years. The Coalition Against Gun Violence (CAGV) has been working for over 24 years to create a safer community, to raise the awareness of the potential dangers of firearms through education and awareness. CAGV supports reasonable gun violence prevention legislation to ensure gun safety at the local, state, and national Toni Wellen, Chair, Coalition Against Gun Violence. Photo provided by Toni Wellen. levels. CAGV focuses on keeping firearms away from irresponsible people. Our Speaker: Toni Wellen is the Chair and co-founder of the Coalition Against Gun Violence, a Santa Barbara County Coalition with over 40 partner organizations. Toni, a resident of Carpinteria, is a Marriage & Family Therapist. She previously worked for The National Council on Alcoholism and as an elementary school teacher. Toni earned degrees from the Los Angeles Conservatory of Music, UCLA, UCI, and Chapman University. She and her husband Larry have four children and seven grandchildren. When: Saturday, July 20, 2019 Where: Valle Verde. 900 Calle De Los Amigos, Santa Barbara, CA. Parking: Please park at Veronica Springs Church, 949 Veronica Springs Road. Free shuttle to and from meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Elizabeth F. Loftus
    ELIZABETH F. LOFTUS Distinguished Professor University of California, Irvine 2393 Social Ecology II Tel: (949) 824-3285 University of California, Irvine Fax: (949) 824-3001 Irvine, California 92697-7080 email: [email protected] USA web: http://socialecology.uci.edu/faculty/eloftus/ EDUCATION B.A., with highest honors in Mathematics and Psychology, UCLA, 1966 M.A., Psychology, Stanford University, 1967 Ph.D., Psychology, Stanford University, 1970 TEACHING EXPERIENCE Permanent Distinguished Professor, University of California, Irvine, 2002 – present Psychology & Social Behavior, 2002- Criminology, Law & Society, 2002 – Cognitive Sciences, 2002- Fellow, Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 2002- Founding Director, Center for Psychology & Law, 2005 - 2012 School of Law, 2007- Affiliate Professor, Univ. of Washington, Psychology Dept and School of Law, 2002 – 2016. Assistant, Associate, Full Professor, University of Washington, 1973-2002 Adjunct Professor of Law, University of Washington, 1984-2002 Assistant Professor, The New School, Graduate Faculty, New York 1970-73 Visiting Harvard University, Seminar on Law and Psychology, 1975-76 National Judicial College, University of Nevada, 1975-87 (summers) Visiting Professor, Georgetown University Law Center, 1986 HONORS AND AWARDS Honorary Degrees Doctor of Science, Miami University (Ohio), 1982 Doctorate Honoris Causa, Leiden University, The Netherlands, 1990 Doctor of Laws, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, City University of New York, 1994 Doctor of Science, University of Portsmouth, England, 1998 Doctor of Philosophy, Honoris Causa, University of Haifa, Israel, 2005 Doctor Honoris Causa, University of Olso, Norway 2008 Doctor of Social Sciences Honoris Causa, Goldsmiths College, University of London 2015 Honorary Societies Phi Beta Kappa, elected 1965 (President of University of Calif.
    [Show full text]
  • Espionage Vestigations
    Counterintelligence ESPIONAGE Division VESTIGATIONS Counterintelligence Training Center ESPIONAGE ESPIONAGE STATUTES 18 Usc 794Espionage Statute Transmittal National Defense Information Espion The act or age To an Agent of Foreign Power \Vith Intent to U.S orAid Foreign Power practice of pying or of Injure 50 Usc 783 -- Unauthorized Disclosure using spies obtain Filler Statute secret intell gence U.S Government Employee Who Knowingly Transmits Jiuraruti Olaaonr Classified Information To Foreign National BRIAN PATRICK REGAN NRc4 ANNA BELAN MONTESDlAc We are here today to tell the full story of Brian Patrick Regans Born 1957 singe never betrayal of his country We want you to see the magnitude married no children of the damage this man was willing to inflict Oldest of four siblings FBI on his country and fellow citizens usAnomey Paul McNtriy employees US Citizen Puerto Rican descent BS University of Virginia 1979 MS Johns Hopkins SAIS 1984 Worked at DOJ FOIPA 1979- 85 Hired by Defense Intelligence Agency DIA in 1985 of classified documents 20000 pages Buried in 19 locations in Virginia and Maryland ACLURM043308 FB1042208 -4 ROBERT HAN SSEN ROBERT HANSSEN FBI iruaj Robert Hanssen birAlaliovas A57 year old veteran FBI employee who received more than $1.4 million in cash jewels while spying for 17 and coat tpanaa 5octytth years for the KGB/SVR He pled Wa dh be lycoalty guilty to 15 counts of espionage- related charges Sentence life iZdmo1coldrngakiVm Vecjc aJrrad ytrioRtibvcrlv1 pJ codiiuaftev dntacs dodravor recovered at the Loon Pkdhoped
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE Taner Edis
    Taner Edis | CV Page 1 of 18 CURRICULUM VITAE Taner Edis Department of Physics Truman State University Kirksville, MO 63501 (660) 785{4583 (660) 785{7604 (fax) [email protected] edis.sites.truman.edu EDUCATION • Ph.D. (Physics) December 1994 The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore Dissertation: Theoretical Analysis of Josephson Junction Systems and Superconducting Superlattices Thesis Advisor: Prof. Kishin Moorjani • M.A. (Physics) 1989 The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore • B.S. Highest Honors (Computer Engineering) 1987 B.S. Highest Honors (Physics) 1987 Bo˘gazi¸ciUniversity, Istanbul, Turkey PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Academic: Truman State University • Professor (2011{present) Associate Professor (2005{2011) Assistant Professor (2000{2005) Taught: Quantum Mechanics, Cosmology, Thermodynamics & Sta- tistical Physics, Mathematical Methods, College Physics, Concepts in Taner Edis | CV Page 2 of 18 Physics, Engineering Thermodynamics, Statics, Physics Seminar, Ju- nior Seminar. Developed and taught: \Weird Science" Junior Interdisciplinary Semi- nar, Computer Programming for Physics. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Atmospheric Science Divi- sion • Participating Guest (2000{2008) Model development work on Impact, LLNL's global 3D atmospheric model. • Summer Faculty (1998 and 1999) Modeling aerosol and cloud effects on radiation transfer. Southern University, Department of Physics • Research Associate (1998{2000) Improved an atmospheric model developed at Lawrence Livermore Na- tional Laboratory. • Instructor (1998{2000) Classical Mechanics,
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating Due Process Challenges to the Federal Death Penalty Act
    DePaul Law Review Volume 53 Issue 4 Summer 2004: Symposium - Race to Article 16 Execution Death Denies Due Process: Evaluating Due Process Challenges to the Federal Death Penalty Act Joshua Herman Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/law-review Recommended Citation Joshua Herman, Death Denies Due Process: Evaluating Due Process Challenges to the Federal Death Penalty Act, 53 DePaul L. Rev. 1777 (2004) Available at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/law-review/vol53/iss4/16 This Comments is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Law at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in DePaul Law Review by an authorized editor of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DEATH DENIES DUE PROCESS: EVALUATING DUE PROCESS CHALLENGES TO THE FEDERAL DEATH PENALTY ACT Who was it? A friend? A good man? Someone who sympathized? Someone who wanted to help? Was it one person only? Or was it mankind? Was help at hand? Were there arguments in his favor that had been overlooked? Of course there must be. Logic is doubtless unshakable, but it cannot withstand a man who wants to go on liv- ing. Where was the Judge whom he had never seen? Where was the high Court, to which he had never penetrated? He raised his hands and spread out all his fingers. 1 -Franz Kafka, The Trial INTRODUCTION In a three-month span in 2002, two district courts declared the Fed- eral Death Penalty Act (FDPA) unconstitutional. 2 United States v. Quinones3 and United States v.
    [Show full text]
  • CSI's Balles Prize Goes to Richard Wiseman For
    Sep Oct pages cut_SI new design masters 8/1/12 9:54 AM Page 5 [ NEWS AND COMMENT CSI’s Balles Prize Goes to Richard Wiseman for Paranormality BARRY KARR The Committee for Skeptical Inquiry (CSI) will award its 2011 Robert P. Balles Annual Prize in Critical Think - ing to psychologist Richard Wiseman for his book Paranormality: Why We See What Isn’t There. Wiseman holds Britain’s only Chair in the Public Understanding of Psy chology, at the University of Hertford shire (UK). He has written several best-selling books, including The Luck Factor, Quirkology, 59 Seconds, and Paranormal ity. More than two million people have taken part in his mass participation experiments, and his YouTube channel has received more than thirty million views. He is one of the most frequently quoted psychologists in the British media and was recently listed data or to explain apparently preternat- as one of the Inde pendent on Sunday’s top ural phenomena. 100 people who make Britain a better This is the seventh year the Robert place to live. He is also a Committee for P. Balles prize has been presented. Pre- KEPTI Skep tical Inquiry fellow and a S - vious winners of this award are: CAL INQUIRER consulting editor. Paranormality is not like a good num- 2010: Steven Novella for his tre - mendous body of work, including the ber of skeptical books looking at paranor- Skeptics’ Guide to the Universe, Science- mal claims. Wiseman is not simply inter- Based Medicine, Neurologica, SKEPTI- ested in looking at a claim, gathering the CAL INQUIRER column “The Science evidence, and debunking the claim.
    [Show full text]