STALIN DIES the Most Powerful Man in the World Is Taken from The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

STALIN DIES The most powerful man in the world is taken from the political field. The dictator of all the Russias is swept into the unknown, as a leaf or m crum kr blown by the wind. Stalin knew he would never see great age when at the funeral of his friend Zhdanov he was a pall-bearer. Malankov was j.,1 ijnuffij named/successor, although no dictator - Cromwell, Mwjagoj,iaj., Hitler, was ever able to bequeath his power. Nor can any Russian, Molotov, Malankov, Beira, Bulganin or any other, inherit the undisputed authority that was Joseph Stalin's. At Teheran, in wartime, Winston Churchill presented to him the Sword of Stalingrad, tribute of Britain to the Red Army. Britain and America were at last Russia's friends, as well as allies. We all believed that when the war was over friendship would last/and the 3 Powers -eEtaitird guarantee world-peace. President Roosevelt brought the goodwill of his country. The old hostility gave place to comradeship of war. Again at the Yalta conference, mostly in harmony, the three great men planned victory. There was no sign, in Stalin's outward bearing, that the 14 men of the Kremlin desired no friendship after victory. When the war ended Field Marshal Montgomery was welcomed there. But as he shrewdly saw, behind lavish hospitality,Stalin would have no military co-operati^r^ZRussia had thrown away t^&^- j^immense goodwlTl she built up in the war./ Ernest Bevin*/^^<= ti #e^^T the MOSCQS Foreign/Ministers'Foreign JwA Conference, to renew friendship j«>!ThelO-million bayonets of the Red Army were Stalin's RAPI^. ZffowfTTy AND +,H*=,A,A,] D BOO FT fre hot'hIr wi.1,1 hn Icrrwi—to nrnrterttr' mm, mJm\"Turned down the best chance of world-peace in all history. Fascinated by innim _ lirnmrlli ni^i wuliilrfiiii . he bad the strength without scruple, to get his way. But the two qualities, without which no man is a great ruler, justice and human feeling, he completely lacked. Absolute power corrupted absolutely. .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Marston Lafrance SWORD of HONOUR
Marston LaFrance SWORD OF HONOUR: THE IRONIST PLACATUS Sword of Honour offers plenty of critical problems quite sufficient unto themselves, but they are further complicated by the mere fact of the trilogy's place in the canon. Because it comes at the end of Waugh's long career the reader is bound to be influenced, more or less unavoidably, by his general view of the earlier work, by his overall conception of an author whom he has enjoyed- or resented- for almost four decades. At least three such general views seem to have emerged over the years, and a brief look at them will suggest that a fourth might prove useful. Those readers who consider Waugh "essentially a comedian", 1 for example, should find Men at Arms the most attractive part of the trilogy, and thus it should surprise no one that this book, the least important of the three, has been called "the best of Waugh's novels".2 Readers convinced that Waugh is the twentieth century's archetypal snob, and prejudiced champion of a defunct aristocracy, must find Officers and Gentlemen impossible and parts of Unconditional Surrend er difficult to accept. Those who view him as primarily a disgruntled Tory satirist- probably the majority, and the best of the lot- will find abundant grist for their aesthetic mills throughout the trilogy, but they will also encounter solid blocks of material which their machinery canno t easily accommodate. There is nothing conspicuously satiric about the relationship between Guy and his father,3 about the deaths of Gervase and lvo, Tony Box-Bender's becoming a monk, Guy's betrayal by Virgini a, Guy's devotion to the ideal represented by Sir Roger of Waybroke, Guy's escape from Crete, Mr.
[Show full text]
Evelyn Waugh Newsletter
EVELYN WAUGH NEWSLETTER Volume 15, Number 2 Autumn 1981 THE NATURE OF A TRIMMER By Thomas A. Gribble Alan Watkins, in The Observer, and Auberon Waugh, in Books and Book men, have written that the character of Trimmer in the Sword of Honour trilogy might have been suggested by Lord Lovat, Waugh's superior officer in the commandoes who forced his resignation from the brigade in the summer of 1943. Certainly there was no love lost between these fellow Catholics. Lord Lovat's autobiography, March Past, contains one of the most vituperative portraits of Waugh in print. Waugh's diaries and letters show that he was deeply offended and wounded by what he considered to be a plot on Lord Lovat's part to remove him from the commandoes, and it is not far~fetched to surmise that he was striking back for his wartime humiliation by caricaturing the Scots aristocrat as a bogus hero and a former ladies hairdresser. It is ironic that Major General Robert Laycock, the commanding officer for whom Waugh had the utmost respect and to whom Officers and Gentlemen is dedicated, was, according to his obituary in The Times, the true possessor of tonsorial skills. Trimmer, however, !ike a!! of Waugh's characters, does not depend upon any rea! person for his existence. Waugh's characters all have their place in the design of his novels and that alone justifies their existence. Trimmer's function is to suggest certain characteristics of the 'wasteland' figures who inhabit the modern world described in Waugh's novels, the "hollow men" who have no true sense of identity.
[Show full text]
THE BATTLE of STALINGRAD Belligerents
THE BATTLE OF STALINGRAD DATE: AUGUST 23 1942 – FEBRUARY 02 1943 Belligerents Germany Soviet Union Italy Romania Hungary Croatia The Battle of Stalingrad was a brutal military campaign between Russian forces and those of Nazi Germany and the Axis powers during World War 2. The battle is infamous as one of the largest, longest and bloodiest engagements in modern warfare: from August 1942 through February 1943, more than two million troops fought in close quarters – and nearly two million people were killed or injured in the fighting, including tens of thousands of Russian civilians. But the Battle of Stalingrad (one of Russia’s important industrial cities) ultimately turned the tide of World War 2 in favor of the Allied forces. PRELUDE In the middle of World War 2 – having captured territory in much of present-day Ukraine and Belarus in the spring on 1942 – Germany’s Wehrmacht forces decide to mount an offensive on southern Russia in the summer of that year. Under the leadership of ruthless head of state Joseph Stalin, Russian forces had already successfully rebuffed a German attack on the western part of the country – one that had the ultimate goal of taking Moscow – during the winter of 1941-42. However, Stalin’s Red Army had suffered significant losses in the fighting, both in terms of manpower and weaponry. Stalin and his generals, including future Soviet Union leader Nikita Khrushchev, fully expected another Nazi attack to be aimed at Moscow. However, Hitler and the Wehrmacht had other ideas. They set their sights on Stalingrad; the city served as an industrial center in Russia, producing, among other important goods, artillery for the country’s troops.
[Show full text]
Annual Liddell Hart Centre for Military Archives Lecture
King's College London Liddell Hart Centre for Military Archives Annual Liddell Hart Centre for Military Archives Lecture How the cold war froze the history of World War Two Professor David Reynolds, FBA given Tuesday, 15 November 2005 © 2005 Copyright in all or part of this text rests with David Reynolds, FBA, and save by prior consent of Professor David Reynolds, no part of parts of this text shall be reproduced in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, now known or to be devised. ‘Anyone who delves deeply into the history of wars comes to realise that the difference between written history and historical truth is more marked in that field than in any other.’ Basil Liddell Hart struck this warning note at the beginning of a 1947 survey of historical literature about the Second World War. In fact, he felt that overall this writing was superior to the instant histories of the Great War a quarter-century or so earlier, mainly because ‘war correspondents were allowed more scope, and more inside information’ in 1939-45 than in 1914-18 and therefore presented a much less varnished portrait of warfare. Since their view was ‘better balanced’, he predicted ‘there is less likely to be such a violent swing from illusion to disillusion as took place in the decade after 1918.’ 1 Despite this generally positive assessment of the emerging historiography of the Second World War, Liddell Hart did note ‘some less favourable factors.’ Above all, he said, ‘there is no sign yet of any adequate contribution to history from the Russian side, which played so large a part’ in the struggle.
[Show full text]
Days of Wonder Announcement
Days of Wonder announces Memoir '44 Battle Map Volume 3 - Sword of Stalingrad First expansion to introduce new play cards since the launch of the base game! Los Altos, CA; Paris, France – October 12, 2009. Days of Wonder announced a new Memoir '44 Battle Map - Sword of Stalingrad, the third in the series of Memoir '44 expansions that feature Overlord scenarios on large-scale, double-sided maps. Sword of Stalingrad, along with the other featured Overlord scenario, Rats in a Factory, highlights the intense fight for the Russian city that is widely believed to have helped turn the tide of war. The confining landscape of the inner-city battle mandated a very different type of warfare, so it's fitting that the Sword of Stalingrad introduces a new Combat Deck - 20 new cards that the game's author, Richard Borg has specifically designed for urban warfare. The Combat Deck marks the first time that additional cards have been created for in-game play in the Memoir '44 system. The Battle Map series is designed for 2 to 8 players and each map is ready-to-play with all terrain, obstacles and unit positions pre-printed, so players can simply add their own figures and play. In addition to the Sword of Stalingrad and Rats in a Factory Overlord scenarios and the new Combat Deck, Battle Map Volume 3 includes: 2 Standard scenarios playable on a regular Memoir ©44 board - Mamayev Kurgan and Pavlov, Hero of the Soviet Union; Summary cards for all previously published Battle Maps and the recently released Mediterranean Theater.
[Show full text]
The Edge * Volume 22 * Issue 2 * March 2013
THE EDGE * VOLUME 22 * ISSUE 2 * MARCH 2013 The Second Cover Page is for the 70 Anniversary of the Battle of Stalingrad The First Cover Page is from Military History Fest 9 * * * THE EDGE * VOLUME 22 * ISSUE 2 * MARCH 2013 * Page 2 of 68 * * * * Page 4: Commanders Corner * Page 5: HRS Communications . * Page 7: HRS Year End Financial Report for 2012 * Page 12: HRS Event Listing * Page 19: HRS Official Info - Board Member List * Page 20: HRS Meeting Minutes * Page 22: On the Internet – The Battle of Stalingrad * Page 54: On the Internet – Military History Fest Reviews * Page 62: On the Internet – Military Historical Tour D-Day * Page 65: From the Editor – The NEXT Issue * Page 66: Photos – Camp Clark - Battle of the Bulge Tactical * * * THE EDGE * VOLUME 22 * ISSUE 2 * MARCH 2013 * Page 3 of 68 * * * FROM: Carlos Ramirez SUBJECT: Letter 02 to the Society General Information: Our Society membership is moving right along for 2013. As a reminder to all - I am here to assist every member with their questions or concerns. I have an open door policy and will answer your call within 24 hours. I welcome your comments so please feel free to email them to me at [email protected] Insurance: The Insurance for the Society was approved by the B.O.D and subsequently signed by me and it is now in effect for 2013. A hearty big thank you goes out to David Jameson for a well job done. The EDGE Advertising Costs: Some Society members have asked about running classifieds for our members wanting to sell or buy.
[Show full text]
The Organisation and Reception of Eastern Bloc Exhibitions on the British Cold War 'Home Front' C.1956-1979
The Organisation and Reception of Eastern Bloc Exhibitions on the British Cold War 'Home Front' c.1956-1979 VERITY CLARKSON' A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the University of Brighton for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2010 The University of Brighton in collaboration with the Victoria and Albert Museum ABSTRACT This thesis investigates government-sponsored exhibitions originating in the USSR and Eastern Europe held in Britain between 1956-1979. These incoming manifestations of cultural diplomacy were a locus for cultural exchange during the ideological conflict of the Cold War, providing temporary public spaces in which cultural artefacts from the eastern bloc - perceived as an unfamiliar, isolated and rival territory - were displayed and responded to. This research scrutinises the organisation and reception of these usually reCiprocal displays of art, historical artefacts, and commercial goods on the British Cold War 'home front' ~ Taking a British perspective on these exhibitions, this thesis investigates three main research areas. Firstly, organisation: it asks how and why these exhibitions took place and analyses the roles and aims of various British agencies, galleries and museums in facilitating these displays. Secondly, it investigates their cultural diplomatic messages and how they were conveyed through visual and material cultures. Thirdly, it investigates British the responses of British critics and organisational agencies, analysing what these disclose about British attitudes to the Soviet
[Show full text]
TURKISH DIPLOMACY, 1936-1945 a Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts
RUSSOPHOBIC NEUTRALITY: TURKISH DIPLOMACY, 1936-1945 A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History By Onur Isci, M.A. Washington, DC February 27, 2014 Copyright 2014 by Onur Isci All Rights Reserved ii RUSSOPHOBIC NEUTRALITY: TURKISH DIPLOMACY, 1936-1945 Onur Isci, M.A. Thesis Advisor: Mustafa Aksakal, Ph.D ABSTRACT This dissertation tells the story of Soviet-Turkish rivalry during the crucible of World War II. By 1939, Turkey began fast reverting to its old imperial attitude, when Istanbul’s foreign policy had been dictated largely by the Sultan’s fear of Russia. The state of wartime affairs between Ankara and Moscow gradually fell in sharp contrast with the cordial atmosphere of the 1920s and 1930s. As opposed to previous historians who have dismissed Turkey’s wartime neutrality as a wily strategy of capitalizing on war, I argue that the underlying factor, guiding the Turkish state in its quest to remain neutral was the revival of Russophobia amongst the ruling circles in Ankara. There had never been a moment during the war for neither the Allies nor the Axis to depart Turkey from its neutrality unless some form of guarantee had soothed its Russian complex. A closer examination of the Turkish archives and the parliamentary minutes reveals that Turkey desired a German victory over Russia provided that this was followed by a British victory over Germany. In other words, Turks very much hoped to see another Brest-Litovsk status quo: two separate wars involving Germany, conducted independently by Britain and the USSR without cooperation.
[Show full text]
Deadly Battle of WWII
OPERATION URANUS 0. OPERATION URANUS - Story Preface 1. STALINGRAD 2. SOVIET RESISTANCE 3. THE SIEGE OF STALINGRAD 4. VASILY ZAITSEV 5. TANIA CHERNOVA 6. STALINGRAD SNIPERS 7. THE DUEL 8. IS IT TRUE? 9. OPERATION URANUS 10. HITLER FORBIDS SURRENDER 11. GERMAN SURRENDER 12. THE SWORD OF STALINGRAD This image depicts a photo from the Ukrainian Central State Archive. It shows Soviet troops advancing at Kalac during November of 1942. This action was part of the effort to push the German army out of the Soviet Union. The photo was taken by an unnamed Soviet photojournalist. Thinking his conquest of Stalingrad was assured—or—perhaps pondering what to do if the Sixth Army failed him, Hitler spent the first part of November (1942) at Berghof, his now-destroyed home on the Obersalzberg Mountain. (Nearby Eagle's Nest, Eva Braun's favorite spot, is still a popular Berchtesgaden tourist destination.) The serenity of the mountain location, however, would provide little solace for the Nazi leader in the months to come. While Hitler rested amidst the stunning beauty of Bavaria, Stalin listened to his commanders finalize their brilliant plan ("Operation Uranus") to take back Stalingrad. For seven centuries, Russia had succesfully defended herself against invaders—why should this time be different? Initially unsure the Red Army could effectively mount a surprise counter offensive, Stalin was ultimately persuaded by Marshal Zhukov. The plan could work, but only a few men would know about it. Even field commanders were kept in the dark. Plans to launch the attack on November 9 were changed to November 19th, due to weather.
[Show full text]
Downloaded from Manchesterhive.Com at 09/30/2021 08:56:52PM Via Free Access
National snapshots: fixing the past in English war films fred inglis A end of Saving Private Ryan (1998), Steven Spielberg presents us with a screen-filling view of the Stars and Stripes. The flag is huge, well-travelled, loved and faded, like a Jasper Johns painting. It is held out bravely by the wind, which blows it rollingly across the full screen. It is now unthinkable that a British film would end in such a strong, big-hearted and perfectly unironic way. Even British Airways took the flag off their tail fins, though it is to the point of my argument that a surprising number of people noticed the erasure and expostulated. In addressing myself to the English and their Englishness I intend no offence, these neurotically offendable days, either to Scots, Welsh or Irish still ambivalently gathered under the heading ‘British’ (and still formally recognising the Union Jack as their national flag), still less to the 5 per cent of the population whose parents left the old empire some time between 1950 and 1970 or so for the promise of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness as held out in Birmingham, Bradford, Liverpool, East London and elsewhere. In part, indeed, I am addressing that smallish diaspora, since they came to what was thought of, not inaccurately, as the parent-nation in expectation of what parents should give, and that parent in particular: comfort, support, shelter, justice, authority, steadiness, love, trustworthiness. These were qualities which, it was alleged, the British at large and the English as dominant had contrived into the practices of a culture and the formations of a state.
[Show full text]
After the Fall of Stalingrad Stalin Ordered to Execute the Operation Stern
"Heil mein Führer. Sie sind verhaftet!" February 1943: After the fall of Stalingrad Stalin ordered to execute the Operation Stern. It was aimed to enclose and destroy the Heeresgruppen A, B and Don. A kind of Superstalingrad. The Soviets were advancing and Manstein already had a plan to make a counterstrike. However, therefore he had to retreat in some parts. Especially Charkow. Here Hitler vetoed that. He wanted to keep Charkow. Manstein needed the forces there and on February 16th indeed the SS units defending Charkow retreated. Hitler was furious. Instead of flying to Poltawa, where he was going to meet Col. Hyazinth Graf Strachwitz von Groß-Zauche und Camminetz, he flew to Manstein to Saporoschje. What Hitler didn't know: Strachwitz, although member in the SS, was there to arrest and likely kill Hitler as part of Operation Walküre. As Plan B a bomb in a bottle of Cognac was smuggled into the Fw 200 of Hitler. Because the British detonator did not cope with the low temperatures the bomb did not explode... And here is the PoD: 17.02.1943: Hiter wants to fly to Saporoschje, but only after he visited Strachwitz. He wanted to let Manstein wait for him and to show him, who is the Gröfaz (Größter Feldherr aller Zeiten, biggest general of all times). "Mein Führer, Sie sind verhaftet!" The flight was long from Berlin to Poltawa. Hitler was glad to have landed. He was not glad about the war situation however. The Soviets were advancing. And Manstein wanted to retreat. Retreat! That was nearly treachery.
[Show full text]
WW Russian Front
TM Weird War Two: The Russian Front TM By The Evil Polish Brothers (David M. Niecikowski, John P. Niecikowski, Edward F. Niecikowski) Additional Material & Editing By John R. Hopler Concept and Additional Material by Shane Lacy Hensley Cover by Chris Appel Logos by Chris Appel Interior Art by Scott Drouin Photos Courtesty of the National Archives Headers, Footers, and Graphic Design by Chris Libey Editing and Layout by John Hopler Cover Design by Zeke Sparkes Author’s Dedication: To our Polish ancestors and the Polish people, who endured Russian and German occupation in the 1800’s and two devastating World Wars, and Communist occupation in the 20th century. This electronic book is copyright Pinnacle Entertainment Group. Redistribution by print or by file is strictly prohibited. Add 2 to all Page Number References to account for the cover of this Ebook. Special Thanks: To Shane Hensley, whose patience has allowed this book to be more than just a supplement. TM Open Gaming Licensing Information This printing of Weird Wars: Hell Freezes Over: The Russian Front® is done under version 1.0a of the Open Gaming License and the D20 System Trademark License, D20 System Trademark Logo Guide and System Reference Document by permission from Wizards of the Coast.® This product requires the use of the Dungeons & Dragons® Player’s Handbook, Third Edition, published by Wizards of the Coast® Dungeons & Dragons® and Wizards of the Coast® are Registered Trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, and are used with Permission. “d20 System “ and the “d20 System” logo are trademarks owned by Wizards of the Coast® and are used according to the terms of the d20 System License, version 1.0a.
[Show full text]