DOCSLIB.ORG

NRC Staff Pre-Filed Hearing Exhibit NRCE00012, Standard Common

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NRC Staff Pre-Filed Hearing Exhibit NRCE00012, Standard Common STANDARD COMMON AND CURRENT SCIENTIFIC NAMES FOR NORTH AMERICAN AMPHIBIANS, TURTLES, REPTILES & CROCODILIANS Fifth Edition JOSEPH T. COLLINS TRAVIS W. TAGGART The Center for North American Herpetology THE CENTER FOR NORTH AMERICAN HERPETOLOGY www.cnah.org Joseph T. Collins, Director The Center for North American Herpetology 1502 Medinah Circle Lawrence, Kansas 66047 (785) 749-3467 Single copies ofthis publication are available gratis from The Center for North American Herpetology, 1502 Medinah Circle, Lawrence, Kansas 66047 USA; within the United States and Canada, please send a self­ addressed 7xlO-inch manila envelope with sufficient U.S. first class postage affixed for four ounces. Individuals outside the United States and Canada should contact CNAH via email before requesting a copy. A list ofprevious editions of this title is printed on the inside back cover. THE CENTER FOR NORTH AMERICAN HERPETOLOGY BOARD OF DIRECTORS Joseph T. Collins Suzanne L. Collins Kansas Biological Survey The Center for The University ofKansas North American Herpetology 2021 Constant Avenue 1502 Medinah Circle Lawrence, Kansas 66047 Lawrence, Kansas 66047 Kelly J. Irwin James L. Knight Arkansas Game & Fish South Carolina Commission State Museum 915 East Sevier Street P. O. Box 100107 Benton, Arkansas 72015 Columbia, South Carolina 29202 Robert Powell Travis W. Taggart Department of Biology Sternberg Museum ofNatural History Avila College Fort Hays State University 11901 Woman Road 3000 Sternberg Drive Kansas City, Missouri 64145 Hays, Kansas 67601 Cover drawing of an Eastern Racer (Coluber constrictor) by Travis W. Taggart, Sternberg Museum of Natural History, Fort Hays State University, Hays, Kansas 67601. 30 THE CENTER FOR NORTH AMERICAN HERPETOLOGY ELAPHEFitzinger, 1833 - RAT SNAKES & FOX SNAKES E. alleghaniensis Holbrook, 1836 ................................. Eastern Rat Snake E. bairdi (Yarrow, 1880) ............................................... Baird's Rat Snake E. emoryi (Baird & Girard, 1853) ......................... Great Plains Rat Snake E. e. emoryi (Baird & Girard, 1853) .......................... Northern Plains Rat Snake E. e. meahllmorum Smith, Chiszar, Staley & Tepedelen, 1994 ........... Southern Plains Rat Snake E. gloydi Conant, 1940 ................................................. Eastern Fox Snake E. guttata (Linnaeus, 1766) ..................................................... Com Snake E. obsoleta (Say, 1823) ................................................ Western Rat Snake E. spiloides (Dumeril, Bibron & Dumeril, 1854) ....... Midland Rat Snake E. vulpina (Baird & Girard, 1853) .............................. Western Fox Snake FARANCIA Gray, 1842 - MUD SNAKE & RAINBOW SNAKE F abacura (Holbrook, 1836) ................................................... Mud Snake F. a. abacura (Holbrook, 1836) ............................................ Eastern Mud Snake F. a. reinwardtii Schlegel, 1837 ........................................... Western Mud Snake F erytrogramma (Palisot de Beauvois, 1801) ................... Rainbow Snake F. e. erytrogramma (Palisot de Beauvois, 1801) ......................... Rainbow Snake F. e. seminola Neill, 1964 ..................................... South Florida Rainbow Snake FICIMIA Gray, 1849 - MEXICAN HOOKNOSE SNAKES F streckeri Taylor, 1931 ................................... Mexican Hooknose Snake GYALOPJON Cope, 1860 - PLATEAU HOOKNOSE SNAKES G. canum (Cope, 1860) ..................................... Western Hooknose Snake G. quadrangulare (Gunther, 1893) ...................... Desert Hooknose Snake HETERODONLatreille, 1801- HOGNOSE SNAKES H. nasicus Baird & Girard, 1852 ........................ Western Hognose Snake H n. gloydi Edgren, 1952 ................................................. Dusty Hognose Snake H n. kennerlyi Kennicott, 1860 ................................... Mexican Hognose Snake H n. nasicus Baird & Girard, 1852 .................................. Plains Hognose Snake H. platirhinos Latreille, 1801 ............................... Eastern Hognose Snake II. simus (Linnaeus, 1766) ................................. Southern Hognose Snake HYPSIGLENA Cope, 1860 - NIGHT SNAKES H. torquata (Gunther, 1860) ................................................... Night Snake H t. jani (Duges, 1865) .......................................................... Texas Night Snake H t. loreala Tanner, 1944 ............................................. Mesa Verde Night Snake H t. nuchalata Tanner, 1943 ........................................... California Night Snake H t. ochrorhyncha Cope, 1860 ........................................... Spotted Night Snake LAMPROPELTIS Fitzinger, 1843 - KING SNAKES & MILK SNAKE L. alterna (Brown, 1901) .................................... Gray-banded Kingsnake L. calligaster (Harlan, 1827) ......................................... Prairie Kingsnake L. c. calligaster (Harlan, 1827) ................................................ Prairie Kingsnake L. c. occipitolineata Price, 1987 ......................... South Florida Mole Kingsnake L. c. rhombomaculata (Holbrook, 1840) ................................... Mole Kingsnake .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Griffith Park Wildlife Management Plan
    GRIFFITH PARK WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT PLAN (FINAL) January 22, 2009 Monterey ensatina Ensatina eschsholtzi, photographed in Brush Canyon in August 2008 (D.S. Cooper) Report submitted to the Los Angeles Department of Recreation and Parks by Cooper Ecological Monitoring, Inc. Contract No. 2930. Daniel S. Cooper and Paul Mathewson Cooper Ecological Monitoring, Inc. 5850 W. 3rd St., #167 Los Angeles, CA 90036 www.cooperecological.com Contact: [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . 4 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (incl. Best Management Practices) . 4 3. INTRODUCTION . 7 3.1. Justification for Plan . 7 3.2 Audience . 8 3.3 History . 9 3.4 Setting . 10 3.5 Wildlife Management Plan Goals and Guiding Principles . 11 4. HABITAT DESCRIPTIONS . 12 4.1 Terrestrial Habitats . 15 4.2 Aquatic Habitats . 22 4.3 Urban Interface Zone . 23 5. SPECIES INFORMATION . 24 5.1 Special-status species . 25 5.2 Stewardship species . 34 6. WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT GOALS . 41 6.1 Promote native wildlife populations and habitats . 41 6.1.1 Identify and defend native vegetation and biological "hotspots" . 41 6.1.2 Clarify location and usage of wildlife corridors . 42 6.1.3 Identify restoration priorities (incl. site descriptions) . 44 6.2 Facilitate the collection of wildlife distribution and ecological information . 51 6.3 Minimize human-wildlife conflict . 52 2 6.3.1 Strengthen law enforcement . 52 6.3.2 Consult with regulatory agencies . 52 6.3.3 Reduce "edge effects" . 54 6.3.4 Manage recreation to avoid conflicts with wildlife . 56 6.3.5 Reduce "passive wildlife feeding" . 58 6.3.6 Reduce use of rodenticides near wildland habitat .
    [Show full text]
  • Snakes of Utah by Douglas C. Cox and Wilmer W. Tanner
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 56 Number 3 Article 16 7-26-1996 Snakes of Utah by Douglas C. Cox and Wilmer W. Tanner Andrew H. Barnum Dixie College, St. George, Utah Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Barnum, Andrew H. (1996) "Snakes of Utah by Douglas C. Cox and Wilmer W. Tanner," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 56 : No. 3 , Article 16. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol56/iss3/16 This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Great Basin Naturalist 56(3), © 1996, pp. 283-285 BOOK REVIEW Snakes of Utah. Douglas C. Cox aud Wilmer would be more useful if a caption were shown W. Tanner; Mark Philbrick, photography. by the other photographs throughout the text, Monte L. Beau Life Science Museum, Brig­ e.g., the photo opposite page 1 aud those shown ham Young University, Provo, UT. 1996. on pages 3, 4, 5, 8. The herpetologist will $17.95 softcover. probably recognize these without caption, but, as stated, it's likely these specialists will not be Snakes of Utah, anticipated for some time, the primary users of the text. Identification of is finally available for distribution. This book­ snakes by these photographs may not be obvi­ let (92 total pages) includes all known species ous to most readers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hognose Snake: a Prairie Survivor for Ten Million Years
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Programs Information: Nebraska State Museum Museum, University of Nebraska State 1977 The Hognose Snake: A Prairie Survivor for Ten Million Years M. R. Voorhies University of Nebraska State Museum, [email protected] R. G. Corner University of Nebraska State Museum Harvey L. Gunderson University of Nebraska State Museum Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/museumprogram Part of the Higher Education Administration Commons Voorhies, M. R.; Corner, R. G.; and Gunderson, Harvey L., "The Hognose Snake: A Prairie Survivor for Ten Million Years" (1977). Programs Information: Nebraska State Museum. 8. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/museumprogram/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Museum, University of Nebraska State at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Programs Information: Nebraska State Museum by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. University of Nebraska State Museum and Planetarium 14th and U Sts. NUMBER 15JAN 12, 1977 ognose snake hunting in sand. The snake uses its shovel-like snout to loosen the soil. Hognose snakes spend most of their time above ground, but burrow in search of food, primarily toads. Even when toads are buried a foot or more in sand, hog­ nose snakes can detect them and dig them out. (Photos by Harvey L. Gunderson) Heterodon platyrhinos. The snout is used in digging; :tivities THE HOG NOSE SNAKE hognose snakes are expert burrowers, the western species being nicknamed the "prairie rooter" by Sand­ hills ranchers. The snakes burrow in pursuit of food which consists Prairie Survivor for almost entirely of toads, although occasionally frogs or small birds and mammals may be eaten.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.7 Biological Resources
    3.7 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This section identifies major plant and animal resources within the City’s Planning Area and assesses the potential impacts of the proposed General Plan on biological resources with the understanding that certain resources, especially wildlife, are transitory and may potentially be present in a wide variety of areas regardless of previous records of observation. The City’s Planning Area consists of its incorporated boundaries and adopted Sphere of Influence (SOI). The County’s Planning Area consists of unincorporated land within the One Valley One Vision (OVOV) Planning Area boundaries that is located outside the City’s boundaries and the adopted SOI. The City and the County Planning Areas together comprise the OVOV Planning Area. A substantial portion of the area within the City has been developed. Species within the remaining natural areas are adapted to the Mediterranean climate of the region, in that they thrive in the cool, wet winters, and dry, hot summers typical of the area. Within the City boundaries, these areas include the Santa Clara River through the City; and portions of San Francisquito Canyon, Sand Canyon, Whitney Canyon, and Placerita Canyon. The major natural features of the City’s adopted SOI include the Liebre Mountains south of the National Forest boundary, including Cruzan Mesa and portions of Tick Canyon, Mint Canyon, Bouquet Canyon and San Francisquito Canyon; and the San Gabriel Mountains north of the National Forest boundary, including portions of Sand Canyon and
    [Show full text]
  • Habitats Bottomland Forests; Interior Rivers and Streams; Mississippi River
    hognose snake will excrete large amounts of foul- smelling waste material if picked up. Mating season occurs in April and May. The female deposits 15 to 25 eggs under rocks or in loose soil from late May to July. Hatching occurs in August or September. Habitats bottomland forests; interior rivers and streams; Mississippi River Iowa Status common; native Iowa Range southern two-thirds of Iowa Bibliography Iowa Department of Natural Resources. 2001. Biodiversity of Iowa: Aquatic Habitats CD-ROM. eastern hognose snake Heterodon platirhinos Kingdom: Animalia Division/Phylum: Chordata - vertebrates Class: Reptilia Order: Squamata Family: Colubridae Features The eastern hognose snake typically ranges from 20 to 33 inches long. Its snout is upturned with a ridge on the top. This snake may be yellow, brown, gray, olive, orange, or red. The back usually has dark blotches, but may be plain. A pair of large dark blotches is found behind the head. The underside of the tail is lighter than the belly. The scales are keeled (ridged). Its head shape is adapted for burrowing after hidden toads and it has elongated teeth used to puncture inflated toads so it can swallow them. Natural History The eastern hognose lives in areas with sandy or loose soil such as floodplains, old fields, woods, and hillsides. This snake eats toads and frogs. It is active in the day. It may overwinter in an abandoned small mammal burrow. It will flatten its head and neck, hiss, and inflate its body with air when disturbed, hence its nickname of “puff adder.” It also may vomit, flip over on its back, shudder a few times, and play dead.
    [Show full text]
  • A Systematic Review of the Great Basin Reptiles in the Collections of Brigham Young University and the University of Utah Wilmer W
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 26 Article 5 Number 3 – Number 4 12-31-1966 A systematic review of the Great Basin reptiles in the collections of Brigham Young University and the University of Utah Wilmer W. Tanner Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah Benjamin H. Banta Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Tanner, Wilmer W. and Banta, Benjamin H. (1966) "A systematic review of the Great Basin reptiles in the collections of Brigham Young University and the University of Utah," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 26 : No. 3 , Article 5. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol26/iss3/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE GREAT BASIN REPTILES IN THE COLLECTIONS OF BRIGHAM YOUNC; UNIVERSITY AND THE UNIVERSriY OF UTAH Wilmer W. Tanner and Benjamin H. Banta' Introduction This report is one of a planned series of analyses of reptile speci- mens taken from the Great Basin and now deposited in the major institutional repositories of the western United States. We hope and anticipate that such reports will provide a more adequate systematic and distributional picture of the Great Basin reptile fauna. At present we are concerned mainly with the species occurring in this region and specimen locality data If such can be completed we would then perhaps have a nearly complete list of species and subspecies occurring in the basin as well as the distribution limits of each.
    [Show full text]
  • First Reported Case of Thrombocytopenia from a Heterodon Nasicus Envenomation T
    Toxicon 157 (2019) 12–17 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Toxicon journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/toxicon Case report First reported case of thrombocytopenia from a Heterodon nasicus envenomation T ∗ Nicklaus Brandehoffa,c, , Cara F. Smithb, Jennie A. Buchanana, Stephen P. Mackessyb, Caitlin F. Bonneya a Rocky Mountain Poison and Drug Center – Denver Health and Hospital Authority, Denver, CO, USA b School of Biological Sciences, University of Northern Colorado, Greeley, CO, USA c University of California, San Francisco-Fresno, Fresno, CA, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Context: The vast majority of the 2.5 million annual worldwide venomous snakebites are attributed to Viperidae Envenomation or Elapidae envenomations. Of the nearly 2000 Colubridae species described, only a handful are known to cause Colubridae medically significant envenomations. Considered medically insignificant, Heterodon nasicus (Western Hognose Heterodon nasicus Snake) is a North American rear-fanged colubrid common in the legal pet trading industry. Previously reported cases of envenomations describe local pain, swelling, edema, and blistering. However, there are no reported cases of systemic or hematologic toxicity. Case details: A 20-year-old female sustained a bite while feeding a captive H. nasicus causing local symptoms and thrombocytopenia. On day three after envenomation, the patient was seen in the emergency department for persistent pain, swelling, and blistering. At that time, she was found to have a platelet count of 90 × 109/L. Previous routine platelet counts ranged from 315 to 373 × 109/L during the prior two years. Local symptoms peaked on day seven post envenomation. Her local symptoms and thrombocytopenia improved on evaluation four months after envenomation.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Authority Over the Use of Native Amphibians and Reptiles in the United States State of the Union
    STATE OF THE UNION: Legal Authority Over the Use of Native Amphibians and Reptiles in the United States STATE OF THE UNION: Legal Authority Over the Use of Native Amphibians and Reptiles in the United States Coordinating Editors Priya Nanjappa1 and Paulette M. Conrad2 Editorial Assistants Randi Logsdon3, Cara Allen3, Brian Todd4, and Betsy Bolster3 1Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies Washington, DC 2Nevada Department of Wildlife Las Vegas, NV 3California Department of Fish and Game Sacramento, CA 4University of California-Davis Davis, CA ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS WE THANK THE FOLLOWING PARTNERS FOR FUNDING AND IN-KIND CONTRIBUTIONS RELATED TO THE DEVELOPMENT, EDITING, AND PRODUCTION OF THIS DOCUMENT: US Fish & Wildlife Service Competitive State Wildlife Grant Program funding for “Amphibian & Reptile Conservation Need” proposal, with its five primary partner states: l Missouri Department of Conservation l Nevada Department of Wildlife l California Department of Fish and Game l Georgia Department of Natural Resources l Michigan Department of Natural Resources Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies Missouri Conservation Heritage Foundation Arizona Game and Fish Department US Fish & Wildlife Service, International Affairs, International Wildlife Trade Program DJ Case & Associates Special thanks to Victor Young for his skill and assistance in graphic design for this document. 2009 Amphibian & Reptile Regulatory Summit Planning Team: Polly Conrad (Nevada Department of Wildlife), Gene Elms (Arizona Game and Fish Department), Mike Harris (Georgia Department of Natural Resources), Captain Linda Harrison (Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission), Priya Nanjappa (Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies), Matt Wagner (Texas Parks and Wildlife Department), and Captain John West (since retired, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission) Nanjappa, P.
    [Show full text]
  • Thirty-Nine Species of Snakes Inhabit Illinois, Dwelling in Forests, Grasslands
    I l l i n o i s yellowbelly water snake Nerodia erythrogaster SNAKESSNAKES eastern hognose snake Heterodon platirhinos eastern worm snake Carphophis amoenus racer Coluber constrictor western ribbon snake Thamnophis proximus Graham’s crayfish snake Regina grahamii northern water snake Nerodia sipedon western mud snake Farancia abacura smooth earth snake Virginia valeriae common garter snake Thamnophis sirtalis redbelly snake Storeria occipitomaculata western fox snake Pantherophis vulpinus prairie kingsnake Lampropeltis calligaster bullsnake Pituophis catenifer diamondback water snake Nerodia rhombifer common kingsnake Lampropeltis getula red milk snake Lampropeltis triangulum syspila brown snake Storeria dekayi rough green snake Opheodrys aestivus black rat snake juvenile cottonmouth juvenile ringneck snake Diadophis punctatus black rat snake Pantherophis spiloides cottonmouth Agkistrodon piscivorus timber rattlesnake juvenile copperhead juvenile eastern massasauga juvenile timber rattlesnake Crotalus horridus copperhead Agkistrodon contortrix eastern massasauga Sistrurus catenatus Species List Family Colubridae This poster was made possible by: eastern worm snake Carphophis amoenus hirty-nine species of snakes inhabit Illinois, dwelling in forests, grasslands, marshes, swamps, ponds, racer Coluber constrictor ringneck snake Diadophis punctatus western mud snake Farancia abacura Illinois Department of Natural Resources lakes, streams, rivers, and sloughs. Some species are quite common, while others are very rare. These eastern hognose snake Heterodon platirhinos prairie kingsnake Lampropeltis calligaster Division of Education common kingsnake Lampropeltis getula Division of Natural Heritage reptiles are solitary predators that eat a variety of prey. Snakes have interesting structural features Classification: red milk snake Lampropeltis triangulum syspila T yellowbelly water snake Nerodia erythrogaster Illinois State Museum Kingdom Animalia diamondback water snake Nerodia rhombifer including the Jacobson’s organ, which is used to detect odors.
    [Show full text]
  • MA39 Spatial Behavioural Ecology of the Malagasy Giant Hognose Snake the Malagasy Giant Hognose Snake, Leioheterodon Madagascari
    MA39 Spatial behavioural ecology of the Malagasy Giant Hognose snake The Malagasy Giant Hognose snake, Leioheterodon madagascariensis, is Madagascar’s largest colubrid snake, attaining sizes greater than 1.5m in length (Glaw and Vences, 2007). This species has been documented engaging in ritual combat and active nest defence (Glaw and Vences, 2007; Mori and Randriamboavonjy, 2010). A preliminary investigation suggests that the behavioural ecology of L. madagascariensis is more complex than previously thought (Williams 2013, unpublished data). The abundance of the Malagasy Giant Hognose at Mahamavo provides a great opportunity to investigate their spatial behavioural ecology i.e. how these animals select and utilize the habitats in which they are found and how they interact with conspecifics and other species. Methodology: Existing sampling routes and/or areas known to have high densities of these snakes will be surveyed at least once a day. All sightings of snakes will be recorded using a GPS receiver and encountered animals will be captured, measured, weighed, sexed and PIT tagged to allow individual identification. Other morphological measurements and sampling (e.g DNA) may also be taken at this time. In addition, details of the habitat in which the animals are encountered will also be recorded (e.g. canopy cover, substrate temperature, distance to water, available prey species etc.). Daily habitat use and movement patterns will be investigated for each tagged individual. A method using fluorescent powder is usually employed but other methods (e.g. thread trailing, radiotelemetry) may also be utilised, depending on the student's interests and resources available to them. Students will also be required to undertake general observational studies to document behaviours such as interactions with conspecifics, hunting and prey choice.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Hognose Snakes Were Listed As a Species of ‘Severe’ and ‘Very High’ Concern in the Northeast United States (NEPARC 2011, Northeast RSGCN List 2014)
    Appendix A: Reptiles Eastern Hog‐nosed Snake Heterodon platirhinos Federal Listing N/A State Listing E Global Rank G5 State Rank S1 Regional Status Very High Photo by New Boston Air Force Station Justification (Reason for Concern in NH) The eastern hognose snake was listed as Threatened by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) as of January 1, 2001 and is considered a species of regional concern in the northeastern United States (Therres 1999). Eastern hognose snakes were listed as a species of ‘Severe’ and ‘Very High’ concern in the northeast United States (NEPARC 2011, Northeast RSGCN list 2014). In New England, the eastern hognose snake is listed as S2 in Rhode Island, S2S3 in Connecticut, and S4 in Massachusetts; it doesn’t occur in Maine. The species was previously unknown from Vermont but a single individual was confirmed in southeastern part of the state within the last 10 years. New Hampshire’s peripheral population of hognose snakes is state endangered (RSA 212‐A, FIS 1000). Hognose snakes in New Hampshire have large home ranges (LaGory et al. 2009, Goulet 2010, Goulet and Mills 2011, Goulet et al. 2015) and are restricted to the Merrimack River corridor south of Concord, an area where development and human population increases are intense and remaining blocks of suitable habitat are becoming smaller and isolated (SPNHF 2005). In addition, the sandy, well‐drained soils preferred by hognose snakes are easily converted to residential and commercial developments and are targeted for commercial sand extraction operations. Distribution The eastern hognose snake is found from southern New England and Ontario south along Atlantic coast to Florida and west to Texas, Kansas, Nebraska, and South Dakota (Ernst and Ernst 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • Systematics of the Colubrid Snake Lamproneltis
    Systematics of the Colubrid Snake Lamproneltis triangulum Lacepede A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Zoology by Kenneth L. Williams B.S., University of Illinois, 1959 M.S., University of Illinois, 1961 August, 1970 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to thank Dr. Douglas A. Rossman, my major professor, for his aid and encouragement during this study. I also wish to thaiik the other members of my advisory committee, Drs. Nell B. Causey, William G. Haag, Walter J. Harman, George H. Lowery, Jr., and J. P. Woodring. This study would have been completely impossible without the aid of the following individuals who loaned me specimens and/or provided me with other information: Walter Auffenberg, Ralph W. Axtell, Joseph R. Bailey, Roger W. Barbour, George T. Baxter, th Albert P. Blair, Richard A. Blake, Richard M. Blaney, Charles M. Bogert, James E. Bohlke, Herbert T. Boschung, Ronald A. Brandon, Donald R. Brothers, Bryce C. Brown, Richard C. Bruce, Janalee P. Caldwell, Charles C. Carpenter, Robert F. Clarke, Joseph T. Collins, Roger Conant, Francis R. Cook, Joseph F. Copp, Bill J. Davis, William G. Degenhardt, John Dickerson, W. E. Dickinson, James R. Dixon, Charles L. Douglas, Neil H. Douglas, William E. Duellman, Mike Duever, Harold A, Dundee, D. G. Dunlap, J. Eiselt, Carl H. Ernest, Denzel E. Ferguson, George W. Foley, Thomas Fritts, Charles M. Fugler, Bryan P. Glass, Stanley W. Gorham, Kenneth L. Gosner, A. G. C.
    [Show full text]