Estimating the Hypothetical Wind Power Potential on Public Lands in Vermont Prepared for the Vermont Department of Public Servi

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Estimating the Hypothetical Wind Power Potential on Public Lands in Vermont Prepared for the Vermont Department of Public Servi Estimating the Hypothetical Wind Power Potential on Public Lands in Vermont Prepared for The Vermont Department of Public Service By Vermont Environmental Research Associates, Inc. December 2003 Introduction 1 Purpose and Objectives 1 Methodology and Analyses 2 Section One: Mapping the Hypothetical Mean Annual Net Energy Production on Public Lands. 2 A. Assemble new wind resource maps for GIS processing. 2 B. Conversion from an area wind map to a linear map. 6 C. Identify hypothetical turbine strings on public lands. 9 D. Estimate the annual net energy production for each “turbine string” segment. 10 E. Screening for proximity to electric transmission lines. 11 Section Two: Evaluating Wind Development Compatibility with Public Land Use Objectives. 11 Results and Conclusions 14 Appendices Appendix 1: Windy State Parcels with Wind Development Compatibility Rating List 17 Appendix 2: U.S. Forest Service Management Areas and Wind Development Compatibility Categories List 20 Lists of Figures and Tables List of Figures Figure 1: The Vermont and New Hampshire region of the New England Resource Wind Map (50 meter wind speeds). 3 Figure 2: Relative size of Vermont land area to land owner types and Wind Class 4 and higher wind resource areas in Vermont. 5 Figure 3: Areal distribution of Vermont’s wind resources in standard Wind Classes at 50 meters above ground level. 6 Figure 4: Wind Class 4 and higher wind resource areas in Vermont Map. 7 Figure 5: Topographic map illustrating turbine strings drawn along ridgelines with Wind Class 4 or greater wind resource. 8 Figure 6: Public lands parcels transected by turbine strings. Map section illustrates “cut” turbine strings outside public land parcel boundaries. 9 Figure 7: Public lands classified by Wind Development Compatibility (WDC) categories together with turbine strings on those lands. 13 List of Tables Table 1: 50-Meter Wind Classes with associated mean wind speeds and the percent of land area in Vermont and public land type found in each wind class. 4 Table 2: Percentage of each public land area type by Wind Development Compatibility category. 14 Table 3: Relative amounts of hypothetical mean annual net wind energy production by Wind Development Compatibility category on three types of public lands. 15 Introduction Interest in utility-scale wind power development in Vermont has increased substantially in recent years. Previous wind resource assessments by the Vermont Department of Public Service (DPS), private wind development firms, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), and the newly released “New England Wind Resource Map” all document that the wind resources along the higher elevations of the Green Mountain ridges are substantial. Many of these windy ridges include publicly owned or controlled land. Policy questions have been raised regarding the use of this public land for commercial wind power development. Some of the issues frequently raised involve learning how much of this resource is on public land, and what is the hypothetical energy production potential of these resources, considering general land use restrictions. The Vermont Department of Public Service commissioned this study in 2003 in recognition of the need for baseline data on the wind energy potential on public landsa on which answers to these questions can be developed and future policies considered. Purpose and Objectives The purpose of this study is to develop estimates of the hypothetical wind power potential on public lands in Vermont. It seeks to estimate how much electrical energy, in a relative sense, could potentially be generated by wind power according to certain wind classes and land use categories. It is hoped that the results of this work will provide baseline data to individuals and organizations responsible for planning and managing public lands and the state’s electrical energy supply and land use policies. Specifically the objectives of this study include: • Assembling publicly available wind resource and public lands data, in collaboration with wind experts and state and federal land management personnel; • Developing hypothetical estimates of the “Mean Annual Net Energy Production” potential on public lands; • Categorizing tracts of public land according to its compatibility for wind power development; and • Tabulating wind resource and land use data to determine the distribution of wind classes across broad categories of wind development compatibilities on public lands. a “Public land” as used in this study includes municipal lands, lands in which the state holds title or has a legal interest, and federal lands as included in the VGIS databases, as are more fully described on page 9 of this report. 1 Methodology and Analyses In this study, hypothetical wind energy production estimates for public lands were made considering the strength of the wind resource; the amount of available ridgeline along which wind turbines might be installed; the proximity to existing electric transmission infrastructure; and potential compatibility with using these ridgelines for wind power development. The methods and analyses used in performing this work are described in the following sections: Section One: Mapping the Hypothetical Mean Annual Net Energy Production on Public Lands. A. Assemble new wind resource maps for GIS processing. A digital version of the "New England Wind Resource Map" prepared by TrueWind Solutions, LLCb in 2003, was obtained for this study. This wind power map was generated at a spatial resolution 200 meter square grid cells using publicly available 1:250,000 scale digital elevation models and a proprietary advanced numerical atmospheric computer model ("Mesomap") developed by TrueWind Solutions, LLC. The model outputs wind statistics for each grid cell calculated by integrating existing surface and upper-air meteorological data with a cell’s elevation and other physiographic characteristics. The Vermont – New Hampshire portion of the New England Wind Resource Map is presented in Figure 1. The region’s windier resource areas (orange- red colors) are shown to be off the Atlantic coast and along the highest ridges of the Appalachian Mountains. The TrueWind Solutions’ computer mapping program is capable of producing wind statistics for specified heights above “effective ground level”c (see www.truewind.com for details and assumptions used in the preparation of this map). b The New England Wind Resource Map was produced in 2003 with joint funding from the Massachusetts Technology Collaborative Renewable Energy Trust, Connecticut Clean Energy Fund, and Northeast Utilities. It was validated by NREL and consulting meteorologists, including those familiar with Vermont’s long-term wind resources. Visit Truewind’s web site at www.truewind.com for further details about the map’s accuracy and assumptions used in its preparation. c “Selected heights chosen on the wind maps may not always be the actual height above ground level. Where the vegetation is dense, the "effective ground level" is not the base of the vegetation because the wind flow is displaced upward. The level of zero wind, called the displacement height, is typically about two-thirds the height of the top of the vegetation. In dense forests the height above ground at which the predicted wind speed actually occurs may be as much as 7-15 m (23-50 ft) higher than indicated on the maps. For example, in an area covered by forest with an average canopy height of approximately 18 m (60 ft), the Wind Map's wind speed prediction at the 50 m (164 ft) level would actually apply to a height of 62 m (204 ft) above ground [50 + 2/3(18)]”. 2 Figure 1: The Vermont and New Hampshire region of the New England Wind Map (50 meter wind speeds). Windier areas or commercial interest are green-blue to red shaded. 3 An electronic map of mean wind speeds at a height of 50 meters was selected for this study. The mean wind speed is a widely used statistic that is easily converted into energy production estimates for wind turbines and the 50-meter height is consistent with the hub-heights of commercially available turbines that are suitable for installation in New England's mountainous regions. The map also categorizes wind speed and wind power density values into seven wind classes that are routinely referenced in the wind industry and are used in this study as the basis for categorizing wind resources. The mean wind speed and power parameters associated with the seven wind classes at the height of 50 meters are presented in Table 1 along with the portion of Vermont’s total land area; and the portions of federal, state, and municipal land area found in each wind class. It should be noted that most of the land area in Vermont, 56 percent (56%), falls below Wind Class 1, averaging less than 5.1 m/s (11.4 mph) mean annual wind speeds. Of the remaining 44 percent classified in Table 1, only the windiest portion of this is commercially attractive for wind power development. In this study, areas with wind Wind Wind Power Speed, Land area Federal State Municipal Class Density, m/s (mph) (% of VT) (% of VT) (% of VT) (% of VT) W/m2 <1 Insignificant 55.7 1.1 2.5 0.4 1 160 5.1 (11.4) 30.1 1.1 3.3 0.1 2 240 5.9 (13.2) 8.7 3.6 1.8 0.2 3 320 6.5 (14.6) 2.6 1.1 0.4 .03 4 400 7.0 (15.7) 1.2 0.2 0.4 0.0 5 480 7.4 (16.6) 1.2 0.2 0.1 .004 6 640 8.2 (18.3) 0.5 .04 .01 0.0 7 1600 11.0 (24.7) .002 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total: 100% 7.3% 8.5% 0.7% Table 1: The left 4 columns show the Wind Classes (50-meter), associated power densities, mean wind speeds with the percent of Vermont’s land area that lies within each wind class.
Recommended publications
  • Town Plan Adopted November 13, 2019
    2019 Granville Town Plan Adopted November 13, 2019 Prepared by the Granville Planning Commission With assistance from Two Rivers-Ottauquechee Regional Commission 0 Table of Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 2 I. Demographics .................................................................................................................................. 3 Goals, Policies, Recommendations: ............................................................................................................... 3 II. Economic Conditions ....................................................................................................................... 4 Goals, Policies, Recommendations ................................................................................................................ 5 III. Physical Conditions and Natural Resources ..................................................................................... 6 Goals, Policies, Recommendations ................................................................................................................ 9 IV. Transportation ............................................................................................................................. 11 Goals, Policies, Recommendations .............................................................................................................. 12 V. Utilities, Facilities, and Services ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Integrating the MAPS Program Into Coordinated Bird Monitoring in the Northeast (U.S
    Integrating the MAPS Program into Coordinated Bird Monitoring in the Northeast (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 5) A Report Submitted to the Northeast Coordinated Bird Monitoring Partnership and the American Bird Conservancy P.O. Box 249, 4249 Loudoun Avenue, The Plains, Virginia 20198 David F. DeSante, James F. Saracco, Peter Pyle, Danielle R. Kaschube, and Mary K. Chambers The Institute for Bird Populations P.O. Box 1346 Point Reyes Station, CA 94956-1346 Voice: 415-663-2050 Fax: 415-663-9482 www.birdpop.org [email protected] March 31, 2008 i TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 3 METHODS ............................................................................................................................................. 5 Collection of MAPS data.................................................................................................................... 5 Considered Species............................................................................................................................. 6 Reproductive Indices, Population Trends, and Adult Apparent Survival .......................................... 6 MAPS Target Species......................................................................................................................... 7 Priority
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Places to Visit and Natural Communities to See There
    Appendix A Places to Visit and Natural Communities to See There his list of places to visit is arranged by biophysical region. Within biophysical regions, the places are listed more or less north-to-south and by county. This list T includes all the places to visit that are mentioned in the natural community profiles, plus several more to round out an exploration of each biophysical region. The list of natural communities at each site is not exhaustive; only the communities that are especially well-expressed at that site are listed. Most of the natural communities listed are easily accessible at the site, though only rarely will they be indicated on trail maps or brochures. You, the naturalist, will need to do the sleuthing to find out where they are. Use topographic maps and aerial photographs if you can get them. In a few cases you will need to do some serious bushwhacking to find the communities listed. Bring your map and compass, and enjoy! Champlain Valley Franklin County Highgate State Park, Highgate Vermont Department of Forests, Parks, and Recreation Temperate Calcareous Cliff Rock River Wildlife Management Area, Highgate Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife Silver Maple-Sensitive Fern Riverine Floodplain Forest Alder Swamp Missisquoi River Delta, Swanton and Highgate Missisquoi National Wildlife Refuge U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Protected with the assistance of The Nature Conservancy Silver Maple-Sensitive Fern Riverine Floodplain Forest Lakeside Floodplain Forest Red or Silver Maple-Green Ash Swamp Pitch Pine Woodland Bog
    [Show full text]
  • Where-To-Go Fifth Edition Buckskin Lodge #412 Order of the Arrow, WWW Theodore Roosevelt Council Boy Scouts of America 2002
    Where-to-Go Fifth Edition Buckskin Lodge #412 Order of the Arrow, WWW Theodore Roosevelt Council Boy Scouts of America 2002 0 The "Where to Go" is published by the Where-to-Go Committee of the Buckskin Lodge #412 Order of the Arrow, WWW, of the Theodore Roosevelt Council, #386, Boy Scouts of America. FIFTH EDITION September, 1991 Updated (2nd printing) September, 1993 Third printing December, 1998 Fourth printing July, 2002 Published under the 2001-2002 administration: Michael Gherlone, Lodge Chief John Gherlone, Lodge Adviser Marc Ryan, Lodge Staff Adviser Edward A. McLaughlin III, Scout Executive Where-to-Go Committee Adviser Stephen V. Sassi Chairman Thomas Liddy Original Word Processing Andrew Jennings Michael Nold Original Research Jeffrey Karz Stephen Sassi Text written by Stephen Sassi 1 This guide is dedicated to the Scouts and volunteers of the Theodore Roosevelt Council Boy Scouts of America And the people it is intended to serve. Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one less traveled by, And that made all the difference...... - R.Frost 2 To: All Scoutmasters From: Stephen V. Sassi Buckskin Lodge Where to Go Adviser Date: 27 June 2002 Re: Where to Go Updates Enclosed in this program packet are updates to the Order of Arrow Where to Go book. Only specific portions of the book were updated and the remainder is unchanged. The list of updated pages appears below. Simply remove the old pages from the book and discard them, replacing the old pages with the new pages provided. First two pages Table of Contents - pages 1,2 Chapter 3 - pages 12,14 Chapter 4 - pages 15-19,25,26 Chapter 5 - All except page 35 (pages 27-34,36) Chapter 6 - pages 37-39, 41,42 Chapter 8 - pages 44-47 Chapter 9 - pages 51,52,54 Chapter 10 - pages 58,59,60 Chapter 11 - pages 62,63 Appendix - pages 64,65,66 We hope that this book will provide you with many new places to hike and camp.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter 2020 Long Trail News
    NEWS Quarterly of the Green Mountain Club WINTER 2020 Codding Hollow Property Conserved | Managing Trails During a Global Pandemic | Winter Hiking Safety Side-to-Side in Less Than a Week | Skiing Vermont’s Highest Peaks CONTENTS Winter 2020, Volume 80, No. 3 The mission of the Green Mountain Club is to make the Vermont mountains play a larger part in the life of the people by protecting and maintaining the Long Trail System and fostering, through education, the stewardship of Vermont’s hiking trails and mountains. Quarterly of the Green Mountain Club Michael DeBonis, Executive Director Alicia DiCocco, Director of Development & Communications PHOTO BY ALICIA DICOCCO Becky Riley and Hugh DiCocco on Mt. Mansfield Ilana Copel, Communications Assistant Richard Andrews, Volunteer Copy Editor Sylvie Vidrine, Graphic Designer FEATURES Green Mountain Club 4711 Waterbury-Stowe Road ❯ Waterbury Center, Vermont 05677 6 Celebrating Success after 34 years: Phone: (802) 244-7037 Codding Hollow Property Conserved Fax: (802) 244-5867 E-mail: [email protected] by Mollie Flanigan Website: greenmountainclub.org ❯ The Long Trail News is published by The 10 Managing Trails During a Global Pandemic: Green Mountain Club, Inc., a nonprofit Field Staff Reflections of the 2020 Season organization founded in 1910. In a 1971 Joint Resolution, the Vermont Legislature by John Plummer designated the Green Mountain Club the “founder, sponsor, defender and protector of 12 ❯ Hiking Trails During a Global Pandemic: the Long Trail System...” Hiker Reflections of the 2020 Season Contributions of manuscripts, photos, illustrations, and news are welcome from by Rick Dugan members and nonmembers. ❯ The opinions expressed byLTN contributors 16 Going the Distance: are not necessarily those of GMC.
    [Show full text]
  • Provide More Recreation Page: 1
    Provide More Recreation Page: 1 INTRODUCTION This project documents both the existing value and potential of New England’s working forest lands: Value – not only in terms of business opportunities, jobs and income – but also nonfinancial values, such as enhanced wildlife populations, recreation opportunities and a healthful environment. This project of the New England Forestry Foundation (NEFF) is aimed at enhancing the contribution the region’s forests can make to sustainability, and is intended to complement other efforts aimed at not only conserving New England’s forests, but also enhancing New England’s agriculture and fisheries. New England’s forests have sustained the six-state region since colonial settlement. They have provided the wood for buildings, fuel to heat them, the fiber for papermaking, the lumber for ships, furniture, boxes and barrels and so much more. As Arizona is defined by its desert landscapes and Iowa by its farms, New England is defined by its forests. These forests provide a wide range of products beyond timber, including maple syrup; balsam fir tips for holiday decorations; paper birch bark for crafts; edibles such as berries, mushrooms and fiddleheads; and curatives made from medicinal plants. They are the home to diverse and abundant wildlife. They are the backdrop for hunting, fishing, hiking, skiing and camping. They also provide other important benefits that we take for granted, including clean air, potable water and carbon storage. In addition to tangible benefits that can be measured in board feet or cords, or miles of hiking trails, forests have been shown to be important to both physical and mental health.
    [Show full text]
  • Acres of ANR Lands by Town
    ANR Fee Acres by Town as of April 1, 2014 TOWN OF DEPARTMENT OF Unit Name ACRES SUM Addison Fish & Wildlife Dead Creek WMA 2495.73 McCuen Slang WMA 53 Snake Mountain WMA 350.63 Whitney/Hospital Creek 313.73 Summary for Fish & Wildlife 3213.09 Forests, Parks & Recreation Chimney Point State Park 53.4 DAR State Park 95.53 Summary for Forests, Parks & Recreation 148.93 Summary for Addison 3362.02 TOWN OF DEPARTMENT OF Unit Name ACRES SUM Albany Fish & Wildlife Black River SB 77.63 Summary for Fish & Wildlife 77.63 Summary for Albany 77.63 Wednesday, December 03, 2014 Page 1 of 83 TOWN OF DEPARTMENT OF Unit Name ACRES SUM Alburgh Fish & Wildlife Dillenbeck Bay AA 1.08 Kelly Bay AA 1.98 Lake Champlain AA 2.08 Mud Creek WMA 1300.39 Summary for Fish & Wildlife 1305.53 Forests, Parks & Recreation Alburg Dunes State Park 650.9 Summary for Forests, Parks & Recreation 650.9 Summary for Alburgh 1956.43 TOWN OF DEPARTMENT OF Unit Name ACRES SUM Andover Forests, Parks & Recreation Okemo State Forest 1436 Summary for Forests, Parks & Recreation 1436 Summary for Andover 1436 TOWN OF DEPARTMENT OF Unit Name ACRES SUM Arlington Fish & Wildlife Battenkill River SB 4.2 Wagon Wheel AA 0.6 Wednesday, December 03, 2014 Page 2 of 83 Waterworks Bridge AA 0.37 Summary for Fish & Wildlife 5.17 Forests, Parks & Recreation Arlington State Forest 225.25 Fisher Scott Memorial Pines 21.91 Summary for Forests, Parks & Recreation 247.16 Summary for Arlington 252.33 TOWN OF DEPARTMENT OF Unit Name ACRES SUM Athens Fish & Wildlife Turner Hill WMA 536.08 Summary for Fish
    [Show full text]
  • Vermont Department of Forests Parks & Recreation Agency of Natural Resources
    Grant# 06130-RTP19-VYCC Vermont Department of Forests Parks & Recreation Agency of Natural Resources RECREATIONAL TRAILS PROGRAM (RTP) GRANT AGREEMENT 1. Parties: This is a Grant Agreement for services between the State of Vermont, Department of Forests, Parks & Recreation (hereinafter called “State”), and the Vermont Youth Conservation Corps with principal place of business at 1949 East Main Street, Richmond, VT (hereinafter called “Subrecipient”). It is the Subrecipient’s responsibility to contact the Vermont Department of Taxes to determine if, by law, the Subrecipient is required to have a Vermont Department of Taxes Business Account Number. 2. Subject Matter: The subject matter of this Grant Agreement is to complete trail construction and trail maintenance projects in Vermont State Parks and State Forests that are permissible and authorized by the United States Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA) Recreational Trails Program (RTP), under Title 23 U.S.C. 206. Detailed services to be provided by the Subrecipient are described in Attachment A. 3. Award Details: Amounts, dates and other award details are shown in the attached Grant Agreement Part 1 – Grant Award Detail. A detailed scope of work covered by this award is described in Attachment A. 4. Amendment: No changes, modifications, or amendments in the terms and conditions of this Grant Agreement shall be effective unless reduced to writing, numbered, and signed by the duly authorized representative of the State and Subrecipient. 5. Cancellation: This Grant Agreement may be cancelled by either party by giving written notice at least 30 days in advance. Cancellation by either party may result in the requirement for the Subrecipient to reimburse all funds distributed under this agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • CCC Camp Listings
    Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) Camps in Vermont Compiled by Phil Elwert, Curator Vermont Historical Society, 1985 Sorted by Town Town Name Company No. State No. Negative No. Accomplishments Barre Camp Wilson Constructed East Barre control dam. Bethel Bethel Camp, 1141 Eradicated gypsy moths until 1936 when company was transferred to Bellows Falls. Not occupied after 1936, bldg. became store house. formed from 199 of Sharon, 1935-36 worked on gypsy moth eradication. Brunswick Brunswick Camp 1152 11023 Did gypsy moth control, forest work and recreation areas in Maidstone Lake (road here too) and Island Pond. Newspaper: “Brunswick Echo”. Mail address: No. Strafford, N.H. Burke Darling State Forest 131 2127 ST-457 Built road to top of Burke Mt., and ski trails and Camp picnic area in Darling State Park. Company also constructed a fire tower on Gore Mt. in 1934. Hist. of Camp: Blotter, v.1 #11, 12 June 1935. Work under direction of the National Park Service. Newspaper: “Burke Mtn. Blotter”. Burke Willoughby Camp 1160 ST-453 Completed work of the 131st Company and built forest roads. (road up mtn. Administration bldg. bathhouse of Crystal Lake.) This Co. moved to E. Burke in Apr. 1936, they came from Proctor-Piper S.F. where they were since Aug. 1935. Cavendish Proctor-Piper State 1218 ST-458 This company built roads, a picnic area, and ski Forest Camp and bridal trails. Newspaper “P-P Pied Piper”. Charlotte Mt. Philo 191 ST-461 Constructed access road and picnic area on Mt. Philo. Side camp from Waterbury closed 10/1936. Colchester Army Camp #2 118 ST-463 An Army camp, possibly to assist with processing 2012 Vermont Historical Society Barre, Vermont 05641-4209 Page 1 enrollees.
    [Show full text]
  • Vermont Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP)
    1 Vermont Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP) 2014-2018 2 Acknowledgments The production of this plan was made possible through the cooperation and assistance of many individuals, organizations, and agencies. The State of Vermont thanks and appreciates the efforts of all who participated in this project. The plan is a better document as a result, and we are grateful for all input received. Acknowledgement of individual efforts is not possible due to the large number of participants and organizations. Hopefully, these planning efforts will result in improvements to outdoor recreation in Vermont. Prepared by: Vermont Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Peter Shumlin, Governor of the State of Vermont Deborah Markowitz, Secretary of the Agency of Natural Resources Michael C. Snyder, Commissioner of the Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation; and State Liaison Officer to the National Park Service Ed O'Leary, Director of Operations, Vermont Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation and Assistant State Liaison Officer Significant assistance was provided by the University of Vermont, Rubenstein School of Environment & Natural Resources and UVM Extension, particularly by Walter Kuentzel, Linda Chase and Monika Derrien, and the Vermont Association of Planning Districts with special thanks to Antoine Chesaux, summer intern. The development and printing of this report were financed in part through a planning grant from the National Park Service, U.S. Department of Interior, under provisions of the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act of 1965 (Public Law 88-578 as amended). The Vermont Agency of Natural Resources is an equal opportunity agency and offers all persons the benefit of participating in each of its programs and competing in all areas of employment, regardless of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, sexual preference, or other non-merit factors.
    [Show full text]
  • Priations for Fiscal Year 2010
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, ENVIRON- MENT, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPRO- PRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010 U.S. SENATE, SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS, Washington, DC. NONDEPARTMENTAL WITNESSES [CLERK’S NOTE.—The subcommittee was unable to hold hearings on nondepartmental witnesses. The statements and letters of those submitting written testimony are as follows:] PREPARED STATEMENT OF THE 1854 TREATY AUTHORITY The 1854 Treaty Authority is an inter-tribal natural resource organization which implements the off-reservation hunting, fishing, and gathering rights of the Grand Portage and Bois Forte Bands of the Lake Superior Chippewa in the area ceded to the United States in the Treaty of 1854. Our program is partially funded by a Public Law 93–638 contract with the Bureau of Indian Affairs. The 1854 Authority respect- fully requests an increase of $270,000 to our existing base funding in order to meet the increased cost of fulfilling our court-ordered responsibilities. For background purposes, the Grand Portage, Bois Forte, and Fond du Lac Bands are signatories to the Treaty of September 30, 1854, 10 Stat. 1109. In that Treaty the Bands ceded approximately 5,000,000 acres in northeastern Minnesota, reserv- ing the right to hunt, fish, and gather in that territory. For most of the 20th cen- tury, those off-reservation rights lay dormant and unrecognized and tribal subsist- ence activities were relegated to lands within reservation boundaries. In 1985 the Bands went to Federal court seeking a declaratory judgment that the 1854 Treaty did indeed reserve these off-reservation rights and that the State of Minnesota had no authority to regulate tribal hunting, fishing, and gathering in the ceded territory.
    [Show full text]
  • Scenic Route 100 Byway
    Scenic Route 100 Byway Recreational Resources WARREN ROXBURY STATE FOREST Granville, Hancock, Rochester, ROXBURY LAND CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION ROXBURY Stockbridge, Pittsfield, Killington,LINCOLN GRANVILLE RESERVATION STATE PARK BETTIS POND SITE Bridgewater, Plymouth, Ludlow, ROXBURY FISH CULTURE STATION Cavendish, Andover, Weston, Londonderry, Jamaica, Wardsboro, Stratton, Dover, Wilmington, Whitingham and Stamford. Granville (138 miles total) RIPTON BRAINTREE ROCHESTER TOWN FOREST LEGEND Hancock RANDOLPH ROCHESTER WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREA GREEN MOUNTAIN NATIONAL FOREST EASEMENT summit (2500ft+) TOWN OF HANCOCK RANDOLPH TOWN FOREST MOUNT CUSHMAN STATE FOREST skiing Rochester golfing ROCHESTER SCHOOL FOREST RILEY BOSTWICK WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREA BETHEL TOWN FOREST trails GOSHEN BETHEL boating/marina camping BRANDON TOWN FOREST RT 100 Byway WHITE RIVER STREAM BANK Expansion (92 mi) Pittsfield Joining RT 100 Towns CHITTENDEN TOWN FOREST PROCTOR VILLAGE FOREST MOUNT CARMEL STATE FOREST Existing RT 100 Byway CHITTENDEN (46 mi) Stockbridge Silver Lake Appalachian Trail State Park BARNARD public conserved lands BARNARD TOWN FOREST Existing RT 100 Towns LES NEWELL WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREA COLTON POND SITE GREEN MOUNTAIN CLUB surface water KENT POND SITE GIFFORD WOODS STATE PARK Vermont Land Trust Easement Janruary 26, 2013 Killington Final Draft RUTLAND CITY FOREST MARSH-BILLINGS-ROCKEFELLER Bridgewater NATIONAL HISTORIC PARK 3.51.75 0 3.5 WOODSTOCK TOWN FOREST (MT TOM PARK) Miles MENDON WOODSTOCK OTTAUQUECHEE WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREA COOLIDGE STATE FOREST VERMONT FOREST LEGACY PROGRAM Notes: This map is for planning AITKEN STATE FOREST purposes only. SWCRPC, TRORC and WRC make no warranty as to TOWN OF SHREWSBURY the accuracy of this data. This data WOODSTOCK TOWN FOREST is believed to be an accurate representation of the information BONES DONATION PLYMOUTH MUNICIPAL FOREST upon which it was derived, but SHREWSBURY PLYMSBURY WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREA errors and omissions may exist.
    [Show full text]