DOCSLIB.ORG

The Babvlonian Texts of Nineveh R27

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The BabvlonianTexts of Nineveh Report on the British Museum's Ashurbanipal Library Project* By Jeanette C. Fincke (Heidelberg) "rr3l learned thc craft of Adapa, the sage, (which is) the secret knowledge, evcrything pertaining to thc scribal art, rr{I am wcll acquaintcdwith the signs of heavcn and carth, I was detiberating in thc assembly ofthe scribal cxpcrts,rrsl was calculating the livcr (which is) an imagc of hcaven together with thc (most) compctcnt oil (divination) cxpcrts, I16l solved complicatcd muthemulicalprohlems that havc not (cvcn) been understoodbeflorc, IrTl rcad the artfully writtcn texts in which thc Sumcrian version was obscurc and the Akkadian version for clarifying (too) difficult, rrtl am cnjoying the cunciform wedgcs (sc. writing) on stone(s) from before the flood." (Ashurbanipal, inscription Lr) This article is the final report on the AshurbanipalLibrary Project of the British Museum that I carried out at the Museum's Departmentof the Ancient Near East over six months in 2003.1 Table of contents I. The British Museum'sAshurbanipal Lihrary X. The Babyloniantexts of the Ninevite Librar- Project......... ill ies................ ............129 II. The British Museum'sexcavations at Kouvun- X. l. The literaryand scientifictexts ........................ 130 jik................. .....:......I 13 X.2. The divinationcorpus: library texts and divi- III. The so-calledAshurbanipal's Library 114 nationreports................... .............l3l IV. The historicalbackground regarding Babyloni- X.3. Comparisonwith the data of the library rec- an scholarsin Assyria.... l15 ords.............. ............134 V. Ashurbanipal'srise to power........... il9 X.4. The Babylonianarchival texts........................... 135 VI. Ashurbanipal'sinterest in the scribalart .........t20 XI. Comparisonwith other Mesopotamianroyal VII. Ashurbanipal'smethod of collectingBabyloni- libraries........ ............137 an tablets 122 XII. Summaryand prospectsfor furtherstudies...... 140 VIII. The Neo-Assyrianlibrary records 124 XIII. Appendix:List of the Museumnumbers of the IX. The writing-boardsof the Neo-Assyrianlibrar- Babyloniantablets from Nineveh accordingto ies in Nineveh................... 126 their genre ........'.......AZ I. The British Museum's Ashurbanipol Library texts the Assyrian king Ashurbanipal ordered to be Project included in his famous royal library. Ashurbanipal (668 - ca. 627 BC) was the sixth Neo-Assyrian king - This part of the British Museum's Ashurbanipal who ruled over Assyria as well as over Babylonia - Library Project sets out to investigate what kind of about 60 years after Tiglath-pileser III had conquered *) My sincerethanks go to ChristopherB. F. Walker and to publish the results of my research in this way. My grati- Dr. Irving L. Finkel of the British Museum,who supervised tude goes to the Townley Group of the Friends of the British the AshurbanipalLibrcry Project, for giving me the honour Museum for funding this project. Dr. Marie-Christine Ludwig to carry out this survey at the British Museum. I owe very kindly offered me hospitality during my first days in London, much to ChristopherWalker for his friendship,encourage- and her friendship, both was and is of much value to me. I ment, support, and tireless readinessto discuss manifold would like to thank Dr. Nils P. HeeBel, Heidelberg, who aspectsof the Kouyunjik Collection,the AshurbanipalLibrary carefully read the first draft of this article and suggested and Nineveh with me; I gaineda lot from my conversations many improvements; this manuscript has benefited from his with him. Irving Finkel constantlyfollowed the processof my critical reading. My thanks are due to Dr. St John Simpson researchand discussedvarious issueswith me. My cordial and, again, to Dr. Irving L. Finkel of the British Museum, thanksgo to the staff of the AncientNear EastDepartment of who kindly undertook the very important task of correcting the British Museumfor their kindnessand support.Dr. John my English where appropriate. My final thanks go to Dr. Curtis of the British Museum has always shown sincere Michaela Weszeli for her attention to this manuscript. concernfor my research,read the manuscript,and provided ') A preliminary report was given during the 49e Rencon- me with additionalinformation for which I am most grateful. tre Assyriologique Internationale, London, 7-1 I July 2003. I am indebted to the Trusteesof the British Museum for This paper will be published together with the other Rencon- "Nineveh" grantingme permissionto work on the Tablet Collectionand tre paperc on the subject in volume 66 of lraq. Archiv fir Orientfurschung 50 (200312004) 112 JeanetteC. Fincke Babylonia (729 BC\. During the first 20 years of Collection and to the collecting activities of Ashurba- Ashurbanipal'sreign, his brotherSamaS-Sum-ukin was nipal. This task has been limited by various facts. appointedking of Babylonia,but later revoltedagainst Firstly, the survey on the tablets of Ashurbanipal's his brother.In 648 BC, Ashurbanipalwas victoriousin library is inevitably basedon the material which has the civil war and took over the kingship of Babylonia. been excavatedso far. We do not know how many This situationgave him direct accessto all the Baby- tabletsare either still waiting in Nineveh to be discov- lonian templearchives. When Ashurbanipalcreated his ered5or have already perishedand been lost forever. extensiveroyal library in the citadel of his Assyrian Moreover,the invaderswho conqueredNineveh in 612 capital city Nineveh (Kouyunjik) he incorporatedAs- BC might have destroyed or even carried off an syrian and Babyloniantablets into the collection.The unknown number of cuneiform tablets. There might tabletswritten in Babyloniancharacters may havebeen also have been looters who ransackedthe ruins of imported from Babylonian libraries, whereas others Nineveh later, or casual visitors and travellers who could have been written by Babylonianscribes in the entered or re-openedearlier excavationsand whose serviceof the Assyrian king.2 finds have since appearedin private collectionsor on The AshurbanipalLibrary Project was initiated by the antiquitiesmarket.6 It is thereforeobvious that the Dr. Ali Yaseen of the University of Mosul who de- material in the British Museum's Kouyunjik Collec- scribed the project to a group of British Museum tion doesnot representthe completenumber of tablets curatorsduring the Nimrud conferencein March 2002. that were included in the libraries and archives in It was explained that the University of Mosul was Ashurbanipal'stime7. However, the numberand varie- intending to establisha new Institute of Cuneiform ty of texts unearthedso far is large enoughto outline Studies, specifically for the study of Ashurbanipal's the focus of Ashurbanipal'slibraries. The number of Library. A specially designedbuilding would contain tablets is also large enough for a statisticalsurvey. an exhibition of castsof tablets,computer facilities and Secondly,the task of relating the Babyloniantexts a library. Dr. Yaseenasked whether the British Muse- to the rest of the Kouyunjik Collection has to be um would agreein principle to supply castsof tablets, postponeduntil the carrying out of a similar project on and he was assuredthat the British Museum would the Ninevite Assyrian tablets.Within the limited time make every effort to co-operate.Shortly afterwardsthis of this initial project it was impossiblealso to examine was confirmed by Dr. John Curtis, Keeper of the the Assyrian texts, the number of which is several British'Museum's Ancient Near East Department,in times higher than the number of the Babyloniantexts an interview in Baghdadwith the Minister of Higher (seebelow). Therefore,the basic task of this research Educationand Scientific Research,Dr. Hummam Ab- has been to record the Babylonianwritten tablets and dul Khalik. This was followed by somepress coverage fragments of the Kouyunjik Collection, to identify the of the subject.3 compositions8or classiff the tablets and fragments As well as agreeingto supply castsof tabletsfrom Ashurbanipal'sLibrary, it was decided in the British 5) The relatively small numberof Ninevite letterswritten Museum that the opportunity should be taken to reap- to Sennacheribleads to the assumptionthat this king's ar- praisethe Library. As the first stageof this process,an chive has not yet been found; seebelow sectionX.4. 6) See e. g. the tablet with a historical epic of the Lord applicationwas madeto the British MuseumFriends to Binning Collectionpublished by C. B. F. Walker - S.N. fund a six-month post purpose. for this The present Kramer in their article "Cuneiform Tabletsin the Collection writer was appointed to this position for the period of Lord Binning," Iraq 44 (1982) 70-86as no. 2 (pp. 76-78). from the l0th of March until the 9th of September, Another exampleis the tablet fragmentof the Ecolepratique 2003. In the British Museum the work was supervised des Hautes Etudesthat is joined to a tablet of the British by the curatorsChristopher B. F. Walker and Irving L. Museum'sKouyunjik collectionand publishedby S. Parpola, "A Finkel. Letter to SennacheribReferring to the Conquestof Bit- This initial part of the Ashurbanipal Library Proj- Ha)iri and Other Events of the Year 693," AOAT 281, Mtinster2002,559-580. The British Museumalso purchased ecl is focusedexclusively on the Babyloniantablets of tabletsunearthed in Kouyunjik, e. g. the numbersor collec- the so-calledlibrary of Ashurbanipala.The intentionof tions1901-10-12,89. 1909-2-13, l. 1909-3-13,l.
Recommended publications
  • On Writing the History of Southern Mesopotamia* by Eva Von

    On Writing the History of Southern Mesopotamia* by Eva Von

    On Writing the History of Southern Mesopotamia* by Eva von Dassow — Colorado State University In his book Babylonia 689-627 B.C., G. Frame provides a maximally detailed his- tory of a specific region during a closely delimited time period, based on all available sources produced during that period or bearing on it. This review article critiques the methods used to derive the history from the sources and the conceptual framework used to apprehend the subject of the history. Babylonia 689-627 B. C , the revised version of Grant Frame's doc- toral dissertation, covers one of the most turbulent and exciting periods of Babylonian history, a time during which Babylon succes- sively experienced destruction and revival at Assyria's hands, then suf- fered rebellion and siege, and lastly awaited the opportunity to over- throw Assyria and inherit most of Assyria's empire. Although, as usual, the preserved textual sources cover these years unevenly, and often are insufficiently varied in type and origin (e.g., royal or non- royal, Babylonian or Assyrian), the years from Sennacherib's destruc- tion of Babylon in 689 to the eve of Nabopolassar's accession in 626 are also a richly documented period. Frame's work is an attempt to digest all of the available sources, including archaeological evidence as well as texts, in order to produce a maximally detailed history. Sur- rounding the book's core, chapters 5-9, which proceed reign by reign through this history, are chapters focussing on the sources (ch. 2), chronology (ch. 3), the composition of Babylonia's population (ch.
  • Princeton/Stanford Working Papers in Classics

    Princeton/Stanford Working Papers in Classics

    Princeton/Stanford Working Papers in Classics The eighth-century revolution Version 1.0 December 2005 Ian Morris Stanford University Abstract: Through most of the 20th century classicists saw the 8th century BC as a period of major changes, which they characterized as “revolutionary,” but in the 1990s critics proposed more gradualist interpretations. In this paper I argue that while 30 years of fieldwork and new analyses inevitably require us to modify the framework established by Snodgrass in the 1970s (a profound social and economic depression in the Aegean c. 1100-800 BC; major population growth in the 8th century; social and cultural transformations that established the parameters of classical society), it nevertheless remains the most convincing interpretation of the evidence, and that the idea of an 8th-century revolution remains useful © Ian Morris. [email protected] 1 THE EIGHTH-CENTURY REVOLUTION Ian Morris Introduction In the eighth century BC the communities of central Aegean Greece (see figure 1) and their colonies overseas laid the foundations of the economic, social, and cultural framework that constrained and enabled Greek achievements for the next five hundred years. Rapid population growth promoted warfare, trade, and political centralization all around the Mediterranean. In most regions, the outcome was a concentration of power in the hands of kings, but Aegean Greeks created a new form of identity, the equal male citizen, living freely within a small polis. This vision of the good society was intensely contested throughout the late eighth century, but by the end of the archaic period it had defeated all rival models in the central Aegean, and was spreading through other Greek communities.
  • Download PDF Version of Article

    Download PDF Version of Article

    STUDIA ORIENTALIA PUBLISHED BY THE FINNISH ORIENTAL SOCIETY 106 OF GOD(S), TREES, KINGS, AND SCHOLARS Neo-Assyrian and Related Studies in Honour of Simo Parpola Edited by Mikko Luukko, Saana Svärd and Raija Mattila HELSINKI 2009 OF GOD(S), TREES, KINGS AND SCHOLARS clay or on a writing board and the other probably in Aramaic onleather in andtheotherprobably clay oronawritingboard ME FRONTISPIECE 118882. Assyrian officialandtwoscribes;oneiswritingincuneiformo . n COURTESY TRUSTEES OF T H E BRITIS H MUSEUM STUDIA ORIENTALIA PUBLISHED BY THE FINNISH ORIENTAL SOCIETY Vol. 106 OF GOD(S), TREES, KINGS, AND SCHOLARS Neo-Assyrian and Related Studies in Honour of Simo Parpola Edited by Mikko Luukko, Saana Svärd and Raija Mattila Helsinki 2009 Of God(s), Trees, Kings, and Scholars: Neo-Assyrian and Related Studies in Honour of Simo Parpola Studia Orientalia, Vol. 106. 2009. Copyright © 2009 by the Finnish Oriental Society, Societas Orientalis Fennica, c/o Institute for Asian and African Studies P.O.Box 59 (Unioninkatu 38 B) FIN-00014 University of Helsinki F i n l a n d Editorial Board Lotta Aunio (African Studies) Jaakko Hämeen-Anttila (Arabic and Islamic Studies) Tapani Harviainen (Semitic Studies) Arvi Hurskainen (African Studies) Juha Janhunen (Altaic and East Asian Studies) Hannu Juusola (Semitic Studies) Klaus Karttunen (South Asian Studies) Kaj Öhrnberg (Librarian of the Society) Heikki Palva (Arabic Linguistics) Asko Parpola (South Asian Studies) Simo Parpola (Assyriology) Rein Raud (Japanese Studies) Saana Svärd (Secretary of the Society)
  • Mesopotamia Timeline

    Mesopotamia Timeline

    Mesopotamia Timeline 5000 BC - The Sumer form the first towns and cities. They use irrigation to farm large areas of land. 4000 BC - The Sumer establish powerful city-states building large ziggurats at the center of their cities as temples to their gods. 3500 BC - Much of lower Mesopotamia is inhabited by numerous Sumer city-states such as Ur, Uruk, Eridu, Kish, Lagash, and Nippur. 3300 BC - The Sumerians invent the first writing. They use pictures for words and inscribe them on clay tablets. 3200 BC - The Sumerians begin to use the wheel on vehicles. 3000 BC - The Sumerians start to implement mathematics using a number system with the base 60. 2700 BC - The famous Sumerian King Gilgamesh rules the city-state of Ur. 2400 BC - The Sumerian language is replaced by the Akkadian language as the primary spoken language in Mesopotamia. 2330 BC - Sargon I of the Akkadians conquers most of the Sumerian city states and creates the world's first empire, the Akkadian Empire. 2250 BC - King Naram-Sin of the Akkadians expands the empire to its largest state. He will rule for 50 years. 2100 BC - After the Akkadian Empire crumbles, the Sumerians once again gain power. The city of Ur is rebuilt. 1900 BC - The Assyrians rise to power in northern Mesopotamia. 1792 BC - Hammurabi becomes king of Babylon. He establishes the Code of Hammurabi and Babylon soon takes over much of Mesopotamia. 1781 BC - King Shamshi-Adad of the Assyrians dies. The First Assyrian Empire is soon taken over by the Babylonians. 1750 BC - Hammurabi dies and the First Babylonian Empire begins to fall apart.
  • Ancient Greek Coins

    Ancient Greek Coins

    Ancient Greek Coins Notes for teachers • Dolphin shaped coins. Late 6th to 5th century BC. These coins were minted in Olbia on the Black Sea coast of Ukraine. From the 8th century BC Greek cities began establishing colonies around the coast of the Black Sea. The mixture of Greek and native currencies resulted in a curious variety of monetary forms including these bronze dolphin shaped items of currency. • Silver stater. Aegina c 485 – 480 BC This coin shows a turtle symbolising the naval strength of Aegina and a punch mark In Athens a stater was valued at a tetradrachm (4 drachms) • Silver staterAspendus c 380 BC This shows wrestlers on one side and part of a horse and star on the other. The inscription gives the name of a city in Pamphylian. • Small silver half drachm. Heracles wearing a lionskin is shown on the obverse and Zeus seated, holding eagle and sceptre on the reverse. • Silver tetradrachm. Athens 450 – 400 BC. This coin design was very poular and shows the goddess Athena in a helmet and has her sacred bird the Owl and an olive sprig on the reverse. Coin values The Greeks didn’t write a value on their coins. Value was determined by the material the coins were made of and by weight. A gold coin was worth more than a silver coin which was worth more than a bronze one. A heavy coin would buy more than a light one. 12 chalkoi = 1 Obol 6 obols = 1 drachm 100 drachma = 1 mina 60 minas = 1 talent An unskilled worker, like someone who unloaded boats or dug ditches in Athens, would be paid about two obols a day.
  • Questions for History of Ancient Mesopotamia by Alexis Castor

    Questions for History of Ancient Mesopotamia by Alexis Castor

    www.YoYoBrain.com - Accelerators for Memory and Learning Questions for History of Ancient Mesopotamia by Alexis Castor Category: Rise of Civilization - Part 1 - (26 questions) Indentify Uruk Vase - oldest known depiction of gods and humans. 3000 B.C. What 2 mountain ranges frame Mesopotamia Zagros Mountains to the east Taurus Mountains to the north When was writing developed in ancient late 4th millenium B.C. Mesopotamia Identify creature: lamassu - Assyrian mythical creature During the 3rd and 2nd millenium B.C. what north - Akkad were the 2 major regions of north and south south - Sumer Mesopotamia called? When did Hammurabi the law giver reign? 1792 - 1750 B.C. What work of fiction did Ctesias, 4th century account of fictional ruler called B.C. Greek, invent about Mesopotamia Sardanapalus, whose empire collapsed due to self-indulgence What does painting refer to: Death of Sardanapalus by Eugene Delacroix in 1827 refers to mythical ruler of Mesopotamia that 4th Century Greek Ctesias invented to show moral rot of rulers from there Who was: Semiramis written about by Diodorus of Greece in 1st century B.C. queen of Assyria and built Bablyon different lover every night that she killed next day mythical Identify ruins: Nineveh of Assyria Identify: 5th century B.C. inscription of Darius I carved in mountainside at Behistun in Iran Identify: Ishtar Gate from Babylon now located in Berlin Identify the ruin: city of Ur in southern Mesopotamia Define: surface survey where archeologist map physical presence of settlements over an area Define: stratigraphy study of different layers of soil in archeology Define: tell (in archaeology) a mound that build up over a period of human settlement Type of pottery: Halaf - salmon colored clay, painted in red and black, geometric and animal designs When was wine first available to upper around 3100 B.C.
  • Separating Fact from Fiction in the Aiolian Migration

    Separating Fact from Fiction in the Aiolian Migration

    hesperia yy (2008) SEPARATING FACT Pages399-430 FROM FICTION IN THE AIOLIAN MIGRATION ABSTRACT Iron Age settlementsin the northeastAegean are usuallyattributed to Aioliancolonists who journeyed across the Aegean from mainland Greece. This articlereviews the literary accounts of the migration and presentsthe relevantarchaeological evidence, with a focuson newmaterial from Troy. No onearea played a dominantrole in colonizing Aiolis, nor is sucha widespread colonizationsupported by the archaeologicalrecord. But the aggressive promotionof migrationaccounts after the PersianWars provedmutually beneficialto bothsides of theAegean and justified the composition of the Delian League. Scholarlyassessments of habitation in thenortheast Aegean during the EarlyIron Age are remarkably consistent: most settlements are attributed toAiolian colonists who had journeyed across the Aegean from Thessaly, Boiotia,Akhaia, or a combinationof all three.1There is no uniformityin theancient sources that deal with the migration, although Orestes and his descendantsare named as theleaders in mostaccounts, and are credited withfounding colonies over a broadgeographic area, including Lesbos, Tenedos,the western and southerncoasts of theTroad, and theregion betweenthe bays of Adramyttion and Smyrna(Fig. 1). In otherwords, mainlandGreece has repeatedly been viewed as theagent responsible for 1. TroyIV, pp. 147-148,248-249; appendixgradually developed into a Mountjoy,Holt Parker,Gabe Pizzorno, Berard1959; Cook 1962,pp. 25-29; magisterialstudy that is includedhere Allison Sterrett,John Wallrodt, Mal- 1973,pp. 360-363;Vanschoonwinkel as a companionarticle (Parker 2008). colm Wiener, and the anonymous 1991,pp. 405-421; Tenger 1999, It is our hope that readersinterested in reviewersfor Hesperia. Most of trie pp. 121-126;Boardman 1999, pp. 23- the Aiolian migrationwill read both articlewas writtenin the Burnham 33; Fisher2000, pp.
  • Neo-Assyrian Treaties As a Source for the Historian: Bonds of Friendship, the Vigilant Subject and the Vengeful King�S Treaty

    Neo-Assyrian Treaties As a Source for the Historian: Bonds of Friendship, the Vigilant Subject and the Vengeful KingS Treaty

    WRITING NEO-ASSYRIAN HISTORY Sources, Problems, and Approaches Proceedings of an International Conference Held at the University of Helsinki on September 22-25, 2014 Edited by G.B. Lanfranchi, R. Mattila and R. Rollinger THE NEO-ASSYRIAN TEXT CORPUS PROJECT 2019 STATE ARCHIVES OF ASSYRIA STUDIES Published by the Neo-Assyrian Text Corpus Project, Helsinki in association with the Foundation for Finnish Assyriological Research Project Director Simo Parpola VOLUME XXX G.B. Lanfranchi, R. Mattila and R. Rollinger (eds.) WRITING NEO-ASSYRIAN HISTORY SOURCES, PROBLEMS, AND APPROACHES THE NEO- ASSYRIAN TEXT CORPUS PROJECT State Archives of Assyria Studies is a series of monographic studies relating to and supplementing the text editions published in the SAA series. Manuscripts are accepted in English, French and German. The responsibility for the contents of the volumes rests entirely with the authors. © 2019 by the Neo-Assyrian Text Corpus Project, Helsinki and the Foundation for Finnish Assyriological Research All Rights Reserved Published with the support of the Foundation for Finnish Assyriological Research Set in Times The Assyrian Royal Seal emblem drawn by Dominique Collon from original Seventh Century B.C. impressions (BM 84672 and 84677) in the British Museum Cover: Assyrian scribes recording spoils of war. Wall painting in the palace of Til-Barsip. After A. Parrot, Nineveh and Babylon (Paris, 1961), fig. 348. Typesetting by G.B. Lanfranchi Cover typography by Teemu Lipasti and Mikko Heikkinen Printed in the USA ISBN-13 978-952-10-9503-0 (Volume 30) ISSN 1235-1032 (SAAS) ISSN 1798-7431 (PFFAR) CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................. vii Giovanni Battista Lanfranchi, Raija Mattila, Robert Rollinger, Introduction ..............................
  • The Destruction of Sennacherib

    The Destruction of Sennacherib

    Get hundreds more LitCharts at www.litcharts.com The Destruction of Sennacherib the sleeping army. The Angel breathed in the faces of the POEM TEXT Assyrians. They died as they slept, and the next morning their eyes looked cold and dead. Their hearts beat once in resistance 1 The Assyrian came down like the wolf on the fold, to the Angel of Death, then stopped forever. 2 And his cohorts were gleaming in purple and gold; One horse lay on the ground with wide nostrils—wide not 3 And the sheen of their spears was like stars on the sea, because he was breathing fiercely and proudly like he normally did, but because he was dead. Foam from his dying breaths had 4 When the blue wave rolls nightly on deep Galilee. gathered on the ground. It was as cold as the foam on ocean waves. 5 Like the leaves of the forest when Summer is green, 6 That host with their banners at sunset were seen: The horse's rider lay nearby, in a contorted pose and with 7 Like the leaves of the forest when Autumn hath blown, deathly pale skin. Morning dew had gathered on his forehead, and his armor had already started to rust. No noise came from 8 That host on the morrow lay withered and strown. the armies' tents. There was no one to hold their banners or lift their spears or blow their trumpets. 9 For the Angel of Death spread his wings on the blast, 10 And breathed in the face of the foe as he passed; In the Assyrian capital of Ashur, the wives of the dead Assyrian soldiers wept loudly for their husbands.
  • The Neo-Babylonian Empire New Babylonia Emerged out of the Chaos That Engulfed the Assyrian Empire After the Death of the Akka

    The Neo-Babylonian Empire New Babylonia Emerged out of the Chaos That Engulfed the Assyrian Empire After the Death of the Akka

    NAME: DATE: The Neo-Babylonian Empire New Babylonia emerged out of the chaos that engulfed the Assyrian Empire after the death of the Akkadian king, Ashurbanipal. The Neo-Babylonian Empire extended across Mesopotamia. At its height, the region ruled by the Neo-Babylonian kings reached north into Anatolia, east into Persia, south into Arabia, and west into the Sinai Peninsula. It encompassed the Fertile Crescent and the Tigris and Euphrates River valleys. New Babylonia was a time of great cultural activity. Art and architecture flourished, particularly under the reign of Nebuchadnezzar II, was determined to rebuild the city of Babylonia. His civil engineers built temples, processional roadways, canals, and irrigation works. Nebuchadnezzar II sought to make the city a testament not only to Babylonian greatness, but also to honor the Babylonian gods, including Marduk, chief among the gods. This cultural revival also aimed to glorify Babylonia’s ancient Mesopotamian heritage. During Assyrian rule, Akkadian language had largely been replaced by Aramaic. The Neo-Babylonians sought to revive Akkadian as well as Sumerian-Akkadian cuneiform. Though Aramaic remained common in spoken usage, Akkadian regained its status as the official language for politics and religious as well as among the arts. The Sumerian-Akkadian language, cuneiform script and artwork were resurrected, preserved, and adapted to contemporary uses. ©PBS LearningMedia, 2015 All rights reserved. Timeline of the Neo-Babylonian Empire 616 Nabopolassar unites 575 region as Neo- Ishtar Gate 561 Amel-Marduk becomes king. Babylonian Empire and Walls of 559 Nerglissar becomes king. under Babylon built. 556 Labashi-Marduk becomes king. Chaldean Dynasty.
  • The Great Mesopotamian Civilization

    The Great Mesopotamian Civilization

    The Great Mesopotamian Civilization World History Dalton Hayes Ashton Poor What current nations Mesopotamia is the most closely related to Mesopotamia is most closely related to modern-day Iraq, to a lesser extant Northeastern Syria, Southeastern Turkey, and to a smaller parts of southeastern Iran. Babylon and Nineveh Babylon and Nineveh were located next to rivers for trade. Important Mesopotamian cities • Babylon, Nineveh. • Babylon was destroyed in 689 B.C. And then was rebuilt. • Sargon II the emperor of Nineveh died in battle and Sennacherib took royal seat. • City was famous for its temples. Babylon • Babylon a ancient city of Mesopotamia is one of the most important cities of the Middle East. It was located on the Euphrates river and North of the cities that flourished in South Mesopotamia. • Babylon was destroyed in 689 B.C and later on was rebuilt. Babylon before and after The one on the left is when Babylon got destroyed. The one on the right is when Babylon was rebuilt. Ziggurats the place for religion Ziggurats are, equally alike to a pyramid but are not tombs. They are temples they were built in the Seleucid age. Ziggurats were used for religion and the study of the Mesopotamian religion. Religion of the Mesopotamians • The inner city temples were the place of god plus the palace of the ruler. • The city of Nineveh was famous for its temples Ištar temple and Nabu temple. • They worshiped a goddess named Ištar. • Mesopotamia is a polytheistic religion Nineveh Was famous for there temples. A Early City • A early city (and subsequent buildings) were built on a fault line and suffered damages from multiple earthquakes.
  • Ctesias and the Fall of Nineveh

    Ctesias and the Fall of Nineveh

    Ctesias and the Fall of Nineveh J.D.A. MACGINNIS The Persica of Ctesias are not extant but fragments are preserved in the works of many other ancient writers, notably Diodorus Siculus and Photius; Konig 1972 is an excellent edition of these excerpts.' The purpose of this article is to suggest that certain elements in Ctesias' description of the fall of Nineveh (best surviving in Diodorus Il.xxiv-xxviii) go back to details actually derived from an earlier siege and fall of Babylon. This is not to deny that the narrative of Ctesias—insofar as it is historical—does preserve material genuinely traceable to the fall of Nineveh, only that it has further incorporated extraneous particulars. Thus the barest outline of a Babylonian and a Median king uniting to bring about the end of the Assyrian empire is correct (Smith, 126-31; Roux 1980, 343^7) though the exact chronology has been much disputed (see J. Gates in the forthcoming volume 3. 2 of the new Cambridge Ancient History). Furthermore, the names of the protagonists are confused: Belesys could just be a corruption of Nabu-apla- usur (Nabopolassar) but Arbaces cannot be Umakishtar / Cyaxares, and in fact the suggestion of Jacoby (col. 2049) that Ctesias has inserted the names of two leading Persian officials of the time known from Xenophon, namely the Arbaces who commanded at Cunaxa and the Belesys who was satrap of Syria, is convincing. Another mistake in the Greek accounts is making the last king of Assyria Sardanapallos, that is Ashurbanipal. In fact the last king was Sinshar-ishkun; among the writers of antiquity only Abydenus names him correctly in the form Sarakos (Gadd 1923, p.