DOCSLIB.ORG

Decew Falls Water Treatment Plant Raw Water Alternatives EA Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Decew Falls Water Treatment Plant Raw Water Alternatives EA Project DeCew Falls Water Treatment Plant Raw Water Alternatives Schedule B Class Environmental Assessment Project File Regional Municipality of Niagara December 2013 DeCew Falls Water Treatment Plant Raw Water Alternatives Schedule B Class Environmental Assessment Project File Regional Municipality of Niagara Issue and Revision Record Rev Date Originator Checker Approver Description 00 10/25/2013 G. Harris W. Andrews W. Andrews Draft – For Region’s Review 01 11/29/2013 G. Harris W. Andrews W. Andrews Final – Issued For Public Comment This document has been prepared for the titled project or named part thereof and should not be relied upon or used for any other project without an independent check being carried out as to its suitability and prior written authorization of Hatch Mott MacDonald being obtained. Hatch Mott MacDonald accepts no responsibility or liability for the consequence of this document being used for a purpose other than the purposes for which it was commissioned. Any person using or relying on the document for such other purpose agrees, and will by such use or reliance be taken to confirm their agreement to indemnify Hatch Mott MacDonald for all loss or damage resulting therefrom. Hatch Mott MacDonald accepts no responsibility or liability for this document to any party other than the person by whom it was commissioned. To the extent that this report is based on information supplied by other parties, Hatch Mott MacDonald accepts no liability for any loss or damage suffered by the client, whether through contract or tort, stemming from any conclusions based on data supplied by parties other than Hatch Mott MacDonald and used by Hatch Mott MacDonald in preparing this report. Regional Municipality of Niagara DeCew Falls WTP Raw Water Alternatives Schedule B Class EA TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background.................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Existing Facilities ......................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Lake Gibson and Lake Moodie Intakes ........................................................................ 2 1.4 Agreement with Ontario Power Generation .................................................................. 2 2 PROJECT NEEDS ASSESSMENT .................................................................................... 3 2.1 Project Objective .......................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Performance Requirements ......................................................................................... 3 2.3 Current and Future Demand for Water ......................................................................... 3 2.4 Problem and Opportunity Statement ............................................................................ 4 2.4.1 Problem Statement ............................................................................................... 4 2.4.2 Opportunity Statement .......................................................................................... 4 2.5 Study Area ................................................................................................................... 4 3 CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PROCESS .................................................... 0 3.1 Class EA Procedures ................................................................................................... 0 3.2 Public Consultation ...................................................................................................... 1 4 PROJECT ALTERNATIVES AND EVALUATION PROCESS ............................................ 3 4.1 Decision Making Process ............................................................................................. 3 4.2 Long List of Alternative Solutions ................................................................................. 3 4.3 Screening Criteria ........................................................................................................ 5 4.4 Evaluation Criteria........................................................................................................ 7 4.5 Scoring ........................................................................................................................ 7 5 PUBLIC AND AGENCY CONSULTATION .......................................................................34 5.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................34 5.2 Public Notification and Consultation ............................................................................34 5.3 Agency Notification and Consultation ..........................................................................44 5.4 First Nations Consultation ...........................................................................................44 6 IDENTIFICATION OF PREFERRED SOLUTIONS ............................................................45 6.1 Archaeological Impacts ...............................................................................................45 6.2 Natural Environmental Impacts ...................................................................................45 6.3 Cultural Heritage Assessment .....................................................................................46 6.4 Socio-Economic Impacts.............................................................................................46 7 IMPLEMENTATION ..........................................................................................................47 7.1 Approvals Process ......................................................................................................47 7.2 Commitments and Mitigation Measures ......................................................................47 7.3 Class Environmental Assessment Requirements ........................................................47 7.4 Notice of Completion ...................................................................................................48 7.5 Objections to the Project .............................................................................................48 7.6 Agency Approvals .......................................................................................................49 Rev. 01 December 2013 Regional Municipality of Niagara DeCew Falls WTP Raw Water Alternatives Schedule B Class EA LIST OF TABLES Table 1 – LONG LIST OF ALTERNATIVES Table 2 – Screening of Long List of Alternatives Table 3 – ‘Primary’ Evaluation Criteria Table 4 – ‘Secondary’ Evaluation Criteria Table 5 – ‘Primary’ Evaluation of Alternatives Table 6 – ‘Secondary’ Evaluation of Alternatives Table 7 – Evaluation Summary Table 8 – Publication of Notices Table 9 – Public Information Centre #1 Comments and Responses Table 10 – Public Information Centre #2 Comments and Responses LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1 - DECEW FALLS WTP RAW WATER SUPPLY CLASS EA STUDY AREA FIGURE 2 - CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (CLASS EA) PROCEDURE, DEVELOPED BY THE MUNICIPAL ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION (MEA) OCTOBER 2000, AS AMENDED IN 2007 & 2011 APPENDICIES APPENDIX A – Evaluation of Alternatives APPENDIX B – Agency and First Nations Correspondence APPENDIX C – Resident Correspondence APPENDIX D – Public Information Centres APPENDIX E – Technical and Environmental Reports Rev. 01 December 2013 Regional Municipality of Niagara DeCew Falls WTP Raw Water Alternatives Schedule B Class EA Page 1 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background The DeCew Falls Water Treatment Plant (WTP) is owned and operated by the Regional Municipality of Niagara. It provides potable water to the City of St. Catharines, and parts of the City of Thorold, Town of Lincoln and Town of Niagara on the Lake. The WTP is supplied by raw water from Lake Erie via the Welland Canal. An intake on the west side of the Welland Canal is operated to convey raw water along a 5.3 kilometre intake channel through a series of three reservoirs and on to the WTP. There is an alternative supply via an intake at the Lake Gibson Dam which can provide water to the WTP during periods of maintenance on the intake channel. The intake channel also supplies water to Lake Gibson and ultimately to the DeCew Falls Power Generating Stations. Ontario Power Generation (OPG) leases a portion of the intake channel from Niagara Region and as part of the lease agreement, OPG is responsible for the repair and maintenance of the intake channel, Lake Gibson intake and associated structures and is currently completing urgent repairs required along the waterworks intake channel to protect the dam and levee structures as well as the raw water supply. OPG is therefore jointly promoting this Class Environmental Assessment with Niagara Region. 1.2 Existing Facilities The existing facilities are shown in Figure 1 and are described below. The DeCew Falls Water Treatment Plant (WTP) is located on DeCew Road, approximately 2 kilometres west of Highway 406 in the City of St. Catharines. The WTP services the City of St. Catharines, Thorold (excluding Port Robinson), the Town of Niagara-on-the Lake and the Vineland/Jordon areas of the Town of Lincoln. Due to the location of the WTP on the top of the Niagara Escarpment, the water supply system has the advantage of being able to service the majority of the service area by gravity flow
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Source Protection Plan
    [Type text] SOURCE PROTECTION PLAN for the Niagara Peninsula Source Protection Area Under the Clean Water Act, 2006 (Ontario Regulation 287/07) The Minister has approved this plan. The effective date is October 1, 2014. December 17, 2013 Made possible through the support of the Government of Ontario Approved Source Protection Plan Niagara Peninsula Source Protection Area 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Niagara Peninsula Source Protection Area .................................................................................................1 1.2 Assessment Report .....................................................................................................................................1 1.2.1 Intake Protection Zones 1 and 2 (IPZ-1 & IPZ-2) ................................................................................2 1.2.2 Prescribed Threats under the Act .......................................................................................................4 1.2.3 Local Non-Prescribed Threats .............................................................................................................7 1.2.4 Threats Identified by Event-Based Modelling and Intake Protection Zone 3s (IPZ-3s) ......................7 1.3 Explanatory Document ...............................................................................................................................8 1.4 Niagara Peninsula Source Protection Committee ......................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Shades of Reynoldsville and Decew Town: a History of Power Glen and Vicinity
    Looking back... with Alun Hughes SHADES OF REYNOLDSVILLE AND DECEW TOWN: A HISTORY OF POWER GLEN AND VICINITY Vansickle Road Generating ve Site of Turney ri Station D First Street Louth Homestead Tailrace t k r a e h t THE k n e oc e r L r p m C a Turney Burial E s c POWER GLEN d r a a Ground e a g a Power Glen o l N i R i Village M AREA Brock DeCew Falls University e m v Generating Station ha l Pel e No. 2 w T DeCew Site of Falls Jacksons Saw Mill Generating Flats Remains of N Grist Mill Station Former ST. CATHARINES No. 1 Road Remains of (FORMERLYTHOROLD GRANTHAM) B Mill Dam Merrittville Highway e a 406 v e r DeCews d a Field m Lake s DeCew Mountain DeCeDeCeww Falls Mills Moodie C GorGorgege r DeCew Original e e Water Plant Power Plant k Feeder Remains of D DeC Canal e ew R DeCew House C oad e w DeCew Ro LOT 22 ad CONCESSION 10 Re ser Water Plant voirs Lake Gibson LOT 23 Spillway CONCESSION 10 Cataract Road Site of Aqueduct 0 500 yards 0 500 metres Water Plant Feeder Canal Map by Loris Gasparotto The year 2008 marks the 110th anniversary of During this period the Power Glen area was very the DeCew Falls Generating Station at Power Glen, different from the present day, especially above the the cradle of hydro-electric power in Ontario. Escarpment. There were no reservoirs, just the broad This article traces the history of the Power Glen area shallow valley of Beaverdams Creek (which still from pre-European times.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Ontario Lakewide Management Plan Status
    LAKE ONTARIO LAKEWIDE MANAGEMENT PLAN STATUS APRIL 22, 2004 TAB L E O F CO NTEN TS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... ES-1 CHAPTER 1 STATE OF LAKE ONTARIO 1.1 Summary........................................................................................................................... 1-1 CHAPTER 2 BACKGROUND 2.1 Summary........................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Introduction to Lake Ontario............................................................................................... 2-1 2.2.1 Climate.................................................................................................................. 2-2 2.2.2 Physical Characteristics and Lake Processes ............................................................ 2-2 2.2.3 Aquatic Communities............................................................................................. 2-4 2.2.4 Demographics and Economy of the Basin................................................................ 2-6 2.3 LaMP Background.............................................................................................................. 2-8 2.4 LaMP Structure and Processes............................................................................................. 2-9 2.5 Actions and Progress..........................................................................................................2-10 2.6
    [Show full text]
  • Thorold Lacac
    HERITAGE THOROLD LACAC OUR PROUD HERITAGE iagara • THOROLD LAKE ONTARIO on-the-Lake A Selection of Heritage Buildings & Sites QEW Lewiston Lincoln 104 • • St. Catharines Beamsville ordan Station • 405 Vineland THOROLD • Niagara Falls Rockway • 406 420 190 Short Hills Provincial Park • Allanburg 20 • Port Robinson Pelham 58 • QEW Grand • Wellandort 290 Welland • Island Chambers Corners Stevensville• •Wainfleet 140 Bethel ort Erie Buffalo 3 3 • • Burnaby Port Colborne Ridgeway Willow Bay • • • •Crystal Beach Belleview Beach Sherkston • Point Abino LAKE ERIE All of the sites/buildings shown in this brochure have been designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act. HERITAGE THOROLD LACAC HERITAGE THOROLD LACAC Local Architectural Conservation Advisory Committee Detail of painting by John Wesley Cotton c.1913 City of Thorold, P.O. Box 1044, 3540 Schmon Parkway, J.R.Robertson Collection at the Toronto Public Library Thorold, Ontario L2V 4A7 Tel. (905) 227-6613 • www.heritagethorold.com Design by Kathleen Wittick Design Columbia; Saint John, New Brunswick; St. John’s, City of Thorold wins Newfoundland; Aurora, Ontario; Edmonton, Alberta; Oakville, The Prince of Wales Prize Ontario; Saguenay (Arvida) Quebec; Grimsby, Ontario; Owen Sound, Ontario; Bonavista, Newfoundland; and Richmond, for Municipal Heritage British Columbia. Leadership – 2017 Thorold has a very active Municipal Heritage Committee which has been in place since the early 1980s. As of the beginning of In the world of HERITAGE, the Prince of Wales Prize is the 2018, there are over 50 sites designated under Part IV of the Academy Award – it is the Oscar of all awards, and for 2017 Ontario Heritage Act, which is considered an excellent number the City of Thorold has been given this honour.
    [Show full text]
  • Task 3 Neil Fulton
    REPORT ON POTENTIAL MEASURES TO ALLEVIATE PROBLEMS CREATED BY CtIFWNT HIGH LAKE LEVELS TASK 3 DIVERSIONS MANAGEMENT ,.l -. TO THE INTERNATIONAL JOINT CCXMISSICPJ FROM TASK GROUP MEMBERS GERALD MACMILLXY DON LEONARD RM; GOLDING BILL DALEY MAC ODELL BILL ERDLE PETER YEE . NEIL FULTON SEPTEMBER 1987 EXExmTIVE SUMMARY The Governments of Canada and the United States requested, in August 1986, that the International Joint 'Commission study methods of alleviating the adverse consequences of fluctuating Great Lakes water levels. Part of this study entailed an immediate short-term investigation of methods of alleviating the present high water level crisis. One of the elements of the short-term investigation was a study of diversions management and the results are contained herein. The theoretical maximum flow through the Welland Canal in an extreme crisis situation was estimated to be 12,000 cubic feet per second (cfs). The most significant physical impacts of this maximum flow would be the complete disruption of navigation between Lake Ontario and the upper lakes and the possibility of major damage to the canal itself. A reduction in Lake Erie levels of 1.3 inches would be achieved. The Ogoki and Long Lac Diversions can be closed completely but, because of significant social impacts associated with the closure of the Long Lac Diversion, a.scenario involving a combined annual diversion flow of 800 cfs was investigated to determine the benefits foregone by maintaining the log-driving operation from Long Lake. The most significant physical impacts were the direct loss of 2,500 jobs in the Terrace Bay - Longlac area resulting from the closure of the Kimberly-Clark pulp mill in Terrace Bay due to complete closure of Long Lac Diversion, and the reduction in livelihood and alteration in way of life for local populations associated with the closure of both diversions.
    [Show full text]
  • Sierra Club Ontario: Niagara Report by Dr
    Sierra Club Ontario: Niagara Report By Dr. John Bacher (PhD) 1. Unlike the rest of Ontario, Niagara is not threatened by Government proposing removals from the Greenbelt Among the regions of Ontario’s Greenbelt, Niagara is distinctive insofar that there aren’t any proposals to remove lands from it. This arises out of the fact that the provincial government, without officially saying so, has in effect reaffirmed the provision of the Greenbelt Plan that sees the protection of specialty crop lands as “permanent.” (the same decision was made for the much smaller area of tender fruit growing in the City of Hamilton). Outside of Niagara, the Niagara Escarpment, and the tiny fruit growing areas of Hamilton, the entire Greenbelt is at risk, with the exception of large, provincially significant forests and other restrictive environmental features such as river valleys and floodplains. In such a situation, farmlands are vulnerable to being paved over. This is because urban boundaries in all other areas, including the Oak Ridges Moraine, will become subject to urban boundary expansions every five years through municipal comprehensive reviews. This has the danger to create a “Swiss Cheese Greenbelt”, the risk of which may be increased through changes in government infrastructure policy. In addition to standing firm against Greenbelt removals in Niagara, the government has put forward two significant proposals for expansions, one of which is in the St. Catharines-Thorold area. This proposed expansion would protect the Twelve Mile Creek valley in urban St. Catharines and an important natural corridor between the Short Hills Provincial Park and Lake Gibson.
    [Show full text]
  • Life Member Tour Brochure
    IEEE Canada Life Member Milestone Tour August 25 to September 3, 2013 General Tour Information.......................................................1 Welcome from IEEE Canada President......................................1 Itinerary..............................................................................2 Tour Milestones and Sites of Interest Milestone #1 - First Distant Speech Transmission............4 Milestone #2 - DeCew Falls Hydro-Electric Plant..............4 The Rankine Generating Station – Niagara Falls..............10 Nikola Tesla Monument within Queen Victoria Park..........10 Milestone #3 - First External Cardiac Pacemaker.............10 Peterborough - The Canadian Canoe Museum................12 Peterborough Lift Locks 12 Milestone #4 - Alouette-ISIS Satellite Program...............14 Milestone #5 - First 735 kV AC Transmission System.......15 Alexander Graham Bell Museum, Baddeck......................16 Milestone # 6 - First Submarine Transatlantic Telephone Cable System.............................................................16 Milestone #7 - Landing of the Transatlantic Cable, 1866. 19 Milestone #8 - Reception of Transatlantic Radio signal.....23 Other Milestones in Canada Nelson River HVDC Transmission System.......................25 Pinawa Hydroelectric Power Project...............................26 Eel River High Voltage Direct Current Converter Station...27 First Television Broadcast in Western Canada.................28 First Radio Astronomical Observations Using VLBI...........30 First 500 MeV Proton Beam
    [Show full text]
  • Twelve Mile Creek 2012 Watershed Report Card
    Twelve Mile Creek 2012 Watershed Report Card Groundwater Lake Ontario Lake Ontario Welland Canal Lower Twelve Mile Creek w Shriners Creek w w Upper Twelve Mile Creek Lake Gibson w Beaverdams Creek Lake Ontario Kilometers HHaammiillttoonn NNeeww 0 2.5 5 7.5 10 ¯ YYoorrkk General Natural Areas Successional w« Surface Water Quality Monitoring Station Rock Barren Wetland A! Provincial Groundwater Monitoring Network Bluff Swamp Watercourses Shoreline Wooded Area Significant Groundwater Recharge Area Open Water Provincially Significant Wetland Highly Vulnerable Aquifer HHaallddiimmaanndd Locally Significant Wetland Subwatershed Boundary Lake Erie Area of Natural and Scientific Interest Sampled Subwatershed TWELVE MILE CREEK Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority 250 Thorold Rd., Welland, Ontario L3C 3W2 905-788-3135 [email protected] Watershed Characteristics Area 207.4 km2 encompassing the Twelve Mile Creek, Beaverdams Creek, and Shriners Creek watersheds. Agricultural and residential land uses dominate this watershed. Urban and residential land uses occur within pockets of Niagara Falls, Pelham, Thorold, St. Catharines, and Welland. Agriculture focuses on fruit, grain, and oilseed. There are numerous recreational opportunities including biking and hiking trails, fishing, golfing, and Land Use rowing. Short Hills Provincial Park offers access to a large natural area for activities such as hiking and horseback riding. The Lake Gibson wetland complex is located above the Niagara Escarpment and draws water from the Welland Canal for use at the DeCew Generating Station. 0.5% Upland escarpment, 34% Developed areas, 26% Mixed clay and loam, 4.5% Mixed sand and loam, 30% Soil Type Mixed silt and loam, <0.1% Organic soils, 4.5% Water Dominated by the Haldimand Clay Plain extending south of the Escarpment which runs through the study area.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Fish Species at Risk Niagara Peninsula
    Bronte Kilbride Cedar Springs Sheldon Creek Sheldon Creek Mississauga Point Alton Two Mile Pond Appleby Elizabeth Gardens Four mile Creek Distribution of Fish Four Mile Pond Appleby Creek Flamboro Longmoor Carlisle Progreston Pond Medad Valley Nelson Shoreacres Creek Palatine Hill Species at Risk Progreston Fisher's Pond Palmer Sloma Drain Carlisle Pond Brant Hills Tuck Creek Highview Survey Strathcona Gardens Lake Medad Six Mile Creek Bergen Drain Bronte Creek Mountain Gardens Clarksdale Niagara Peninsula Dynes Virgil Roseland Creek Port Weller HarboEuigrht Mile PonBdutkin Drain Millgrove Station Burlington Conservation Authority Breezy's Corners Tyandaga Roseland Port Weller Beach Flamboro Centre (Map 1 of 2) Harper Corners Grindstone Creek Freeman Welland Canal Rambo Creek Weller Park Hager Creek Port Weller Airport Drain Waterdown Eight Mile Creek Gulliver's Lake Niagara Escarpment Indian Creek Lake Blacks Corners Thompson Drain La Salle Indian Point St Catharines Airport Braeheid Survey 403 Millgrove ¤£ Burlington Beach Ontario McDonald Court Falcon Creek St-Catharines ¤£55 Rockcliffe Survey Aldershot Michigan Beach Carlton Park Burlington Canal Hidden Valley Port Dalhousie St. Catharines Clappison's Corners Burlington Bay Skyway Six Mile Creek Hayesland Bayview Hamilton Harbour Martindale Pond Bridgeview Survey Facer Logie's Creek Hamilton Beach Barnesdale Henley Homer Garden City Skyway Grindstone Creek Twelve Mile Creek Rock Chapel Willow Cove Stipes Inlet Royal Botanical Gardens Borer's Falls Windermere Basin Montebello
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2: Niagara Peninsula Source Protection Area Niagara Peninsula Source Protection Area
    Assessment Report – Chapter 2: Niagara Peninsula Source Protection Area Niagara Peninsula Source Protection Area 2. NIAGARA PENINSULA SOURCE PROTECTION AREA The Watershed Characterization Report was the first technical study initiated for the Assessment Report (AR). It explains watershed characteristics and environmental issues that are relevant to source water protection. It provides readily available information on the local watershed to serve as baseline resources for detailed analyses, for example water budgeting. 2.1 Watersheds in the Source Protection Area A watershed is the area of land that drains water in a given region, encompassing both the land and the water, as illustrated below. The O’Connor report recommended that water resources used to supply municipal drinking water systems be managed on a watershed basis. Conservation Authorities are the only watershed management agencies that are organized on a watershed basis. Under the Clean Water Act (CWA), collaboration is required between local municipalities, Conservation Authorities, communities and stakeholders to work together at protecting municipal drinking water supplies. Diagram: Watershed Cross Section (horizontal). Source: Conservation Ontario, 2009. The Niagara Peninsula Source Protection Area (NPSP Area) is located between Lake Ontario and Lake Erie, and overlies the same jurisdiction as the Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority (NPCA). It has an area of about 2,430 square kilometers (km2) with over 450,000 residents (NPCA and AquaResource Inc., 2009). The NPSP Area can be divided into three main drainage areas, which are: • Lake Ontario Drainage area; • Niagara River Drainage area (which includes Welland River); and • Lake Erie Drainage area. NPCA 7 Assessment Report – Chapter 2: Niagara Peninsula Source Protection Area Niagara Peninsula Source Protection Area There is an abundance of subwatersheds within each of these major drainage areas.
    [Show full text]
  • The O-M Plan
    PART C – ENVIRONMENTAL AND GROUND WATER MANAGEMENT POLICIES C1 APPLICABILITY The policies contained in this Section are intended to be applied generally throughout the City and are also intended to complement the Natural Heritage policies articulated in Sections B3.2, B3.3, B3.4 and B3.5. However, where the policies of Section C and the policies elsewhere in this Plan conflict, the more restrictive policies shall prevail. C2 RIVERS AND STREAMS C2.1 FUNCTION OF RIVERS AND STREAMS All of the natural rivers and streams in the City as shown on the Schedules to this Plan are considered to be environmentally significant since they: a) Constitute fish habitat; b) Function as corridors for migrating wildlife habitat movement and vegetation dispersal; c) Serve to maintain the quality and quantity of surface and ground water features; and, d) Assist in the improvement of air quality. It is the intent of this Plan to protect all rivers and streams from incompatible development to minimize the impacts of such development on their function. C2.1.1 Implementation In order to protect fish habitat adjacent to rivers and streams, development and site alteration may be subject to Site Plan Control to identify and protect a natural vegetated buffer area of 30 metres for critical fish habitat and 15 metres for important or marginal fish habitat measured from the stable top of bank for features located outside of the Specialty Crop designation. This Plan does not identify the location of critical, important or marginal fish habitat. As such, the determination of fish habitat type will be required in conjunction with a Planning Act application and will be established in consultation with the NPCA to determine the type or quality of the habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • Following in Laura's Footsteps.FH11
    Looking back... with Alun Hughes FOLLOWING IN LAURAS FOOTSTEPS The story of Laura Secord is well known. In any difference, and even what she wore. Though late June 1813, at her home in Queenston, she heard some of these questions will inevitably arise in the of an American plan to attack the DeCew House in discussion that follows, the article will not seek to Thorold, then in use as a British base with Lieutenant answer them. It will concentrate on the route that she James FitzGibbon in command. FitzGibbon had to took, which has never been definitively settled. be warned. Lauras husband James was the obvious person to do this, but he had been invalided at the The evidence for the route consists of both Battle of Queenston Heights the previous year. written evidence and map evidence. The written Laura had no choice but to go herself, and after a evidence is threefold: petitions and certificates, long and arduous full days trek, reached the DeCew books and magazines, and other written material. House at dusk and conveyed the warning to (All spellings in the various extracts quoted below FitzGibbon. Two days later the advancing American are as they appear in the originals.) troops were ambushed by loyal Native warriors in the beechwoods in the northeastern part of Thorold Petitions and Certificates Township, and after a three-hour battle the Battle of Beaverdams surrendered. The written evidence commences in 1820, when Lauras husband James petitioned the Lieutenant The above is quoted from my earlier article Governor of Upper Canada for the right to occupy Laura Secord and the Prince of Wales.
    [Show full text]