Israel Office______

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Israel Office______ Israel Office_________________________ Die Arbeitspartei und Meretz nach den Primaries und eine noch namenlose neue linke Bewegung Die Primaries der Arbeitspartei israelischen Gesellschaft reserviert sind: für Frauen (Plätze 5, 9, 14, Die Arbeitspartei hat am 4. Dezem- 19), für die Moshav-Bewegung ber ihre parteiinternen Primaries (Platz 12), die Kibbutz-Bewegung abgehalten, um die Wahlliste der (Platz 13), Araber (Platz 15), Partei für die Knesset-Wahlen am Drusen (Platz 16), sozial Schwache 10. Februar 2009 zu ermitteln. Ein (Platz 17), Neueinwanderer (Platz erster Versuch, die Primaries – 18). Die Kandidaten der Moshav- erstmals computergestützt – durch- Bewegung, der Kibbutzim, der zuführen, fand bereits am 2. De- Araber und der Drusen werden nur zember statt. Aufgrund von Proble- von Vertretern dieser Gruppen men mit der Software musste die- gewählt. Gruppe 3 schließlich sind ser aber nach zwei Stunden abge- die frei wählbaren Plätze, insge- brochen werden. samt acht unter den ersten 20. Angesichts der schlechten Wahl- Die Wahl erfolgt auf der Grundlage prognosen für die Arbeitspartei – eines reinen Listensystems, d.h, es derzeit 10 bis 12 Mandate für die gibt nur eine nationale Liste und 18. Knesset – war damit klar, dass keine Direktkandidaten aus Wahl- eine Reihe der bisher 19 Abgeord- kreisen. Wahlberechtigt waren neten nur geringe Chancen haben knapp 60.000 Mitglieder der würde, erneut in die Knesset Arbeitspartei. 31.789 Wahlzettel gewählt zu werden. Nur die wurden abgegeben, was einer rela- Listenplätze 1-10 gelten vor diesem tiv guten Wahlbeteiligung von Hintergrund als sicher. 53,86% entspricht. Gewonnen hat die Wahl Sozial- Die Primaries in der Arbeitspartei minister Isaac Herzog mit einem funktionieren nach folgenden Re- sehr knappen Vorsprung vor Ophir geln. Jeder Wahlberechtigte kann Pines-Paz, Vorsitzender des Innen- 5-8 Kandidaten wählen. Die zu ausschusses der Knesset. Danach wählenden Kandidaten sind in drei kommen Avishai Braverman, ein Gruppen eingeteilt. Gruppe 1 sind anerkannter Ökonom und Vor- der Vorsitzende und der General- sitzender des Finanzausschusses, sekretär der Partei. Beide sind auf Shelly Yachimovich, eine renom- Platz 1 und Platz 7 der Liste ge- mierte Sozialpolitikerin und Matan setzt und werden nicht gewählt. Vilnai, Vize-Verteidigungsminister Gruppe 2 sind Plätze, die für Ver- (vgl. Ergebnisse bis Platz 20 in treter bestimmter Gruppen der beigefügter Liste). Unmittelbar nach den Primaries gaben sich Parteivorsitzender Ehud Barak und Isaac Herzog kämpferisch und 1 Israel Office_________________________ schlossen auch einen Gang in die Tel Aviv vor der Presse erklärt, Opposition nicht aus. dass die Arbeitspartei ihre histo- rische Aufgabe erfüllt habe, und Die Arbeitspartei hat unmittelbar dass sie von einer neuen linken nach den Primaries mit ihrem Bewegung abgelöst werden Wahlkampf begonnen. Ein zentra- müsse. Der Arbeitspartei und be- les Ziel besteht darin, die bei den sonders ihrem Vorsitzenden Ehud letzten Wahlen an Kadima Barak warf er vor, dass es seit verlorenen Stimmen "heimzuho- Jahren eine große Kluft gäbe len". Analysten sprechen hierbei zwischen dem, was die Partei von 6-7 Mandaten. Kadima wird erklärt und dem, was sie politisch deshalb im Wahlkampf als der tut. wichtigste Gegner angesehen und wurde bereits als "political refugee Am 5. Dezember, einen Tag nach camp" porträtiert. Es wird gesagt, den Primaries der Arbeitspartei, dass Ex-Genralstabschef und versammelten sich die Gründer der Transportminister Shaul Mofaz, der neuen linken Bewegung zu ihrer den rechten Flügel in Kadima Gründungskonferenz im Tzavta anführt, sich nach den Wahlen sehr Theater im Herzen Tel Avivs. wahrscheinlich dem Likud an- Gefolgt waren dieser Initiative, die schließen wird. Die Kadima- von der linken Meretz-Partei in Vorsitzende Tzipi Livni wird als einer bisher nicht klar definierten schwache Politikerin gezeichnet, Form geführt werden soll, eine die im Gegensatz zu Ehud Barak Reihe von Künstlern, unter ihnen nicht in der Lage sei, das Land zu bekannte Musiker, Schauspieler führen. und Schriftsteller. Mehrere Redner betonten die Notwendigkeit, in Zugleich wurde in der Arbeitspartei Israel eine neue linke Bewegung zu entschieden, keinen Wahlkampf schaffen, die sich auf die Ziele und nach links, also gegen die Meretz- Ideale der Sozialdemokratie grün- Partei zu führen. Die Gründe den solle. hierfür sind, dass man erstens den linken Block nicht schwächen Haim Oron, der Vorsitzende von möchte, und zweitens wurde an Meretz, kritisierte auf dieser Meretz laut Umfragen bei den Veranstaltung die Arbeitspartei und letzten Wahlen (2006) nur ein Kadima und sagte der neuen Mandat verloren. sozialdemokratischen Bewegung voraus, dass sie eine wichtige Meretz und der neue Bündnis- politische Kraft in Israel werden partner - Streit um die Wahlliste würde. Tzipi Livni und Ehud Barak warf er vor, "Bibi's tools" zu sein, Unklar ist weiterhin, wie sich die also die Werkzeuge von Likud-Chef von Amos Oz in der Presse ange- Benjamin Netanyahu. Oron lud die kündigte neue Linksbewegung nen- Grüne Partei, die sich erstmals nen und politische konstituieren Hoffnungen auf einen Einzug in die wird. Er hatte am 16. November in Knesset machen kann, dazu ein, 2 Israel Office_________________________ sich der neuen Bewegung anzu- Sowohl die schlechten Wahl- schließen. umfragen als auch die Tatsache, dass eine neue linke Gruppierung Am 15.12. hat die Meretz-Partei, als Alternative zur Arbeitspartei derzeit 5 Sitze in der Knesset, ihre gegründet wurde, verdeutlichen, Primaries in Form einer Delegier- dass letztere vor der Heraus- tenwahl abgehalten. Dabei gab es forderung steht, sich inhaltlich und eine Überraschung, denn nicht die programmatisch zu refomieren, Knesset-Fraktionschefin der Partei, wenn sie nicht weiter an politi- Zahava Gal-On, oder der erfahrene schem Einfluss und Gewicht verlie- Abgeordnete und Peace Now- ren will. Seit Beginn der 70er Mitbegründer Abu Vilan gewannen Jahre, damals war Golda Meir die Abstimmung – der Parteivor- Ministerpräsidentin und Parteivor- sitzende Haim Oron war auf Platz 1 sitzende, und seit dem erstmaligen gesetzt – sondern der frühere Wahlsieg des Likud unter Mena- Knessetabgeordnete Ilan Gilon. Die chem Begin im Jahr 1977, hat die weitere Reihenfolge auf der Arbeitspartei kontinuierlich an poli- Meretz-Liste lautet: Platz 3 Zahava tischem Gewicht verloren. Die Gal-On, Platz 4 Mosi Raz (ex-MK), angefügte Übersicht der erreichten Platz 5 Abu Vilan, Platz 6 Tsvia Mandate bei allen Knessetwahlen Greenfeld (Nachfolgerin des seit 1949 veranschaulicht diesen zurückgetretenen Yossi Beilin). Trend und macht deutlich, dass sich die Arbeitspartei an einem Die Meretz-Führung hatte in der kritischen Punkt ihrer Entwicklung vergangenen Woche mit der Füh- befindet. Entweder sie findet die rung ihres neuen politischen Bünd- Kraft und Entschlossenheit zu einer nispartners vereinbart, dass deren inhaltichen Erneuerung und neuen Vertreter vordere Plätze auf der strategischen Ausrichtung, oder der Meretz-Liste bekommen sollten. Es Abwärtstrend könnte sich fort- heißt, dass sie einen Platz unter setzen. Die Ergebnisse der den ersten fünf und insgesamt drei Knesset-Wahlen am 10. Februar unter den ersten zehn bekommen werden zweifellos einen großen sollen. Da sich unter deren Einfluss auf diesen Prozess haben. Kandidaten, einer von ihnen ist der ehemalige Minister der Arbeits- partei Uzi Baram, aber keine wirk- Dr. Ralf Hexel lich prominenten Namen befinden, Herzliya, 16.12.2009 gibt es in Meretz inzwischen erheb- lichen Widerstand gegen diese Vereinbarung. Es sind nur noch 55 Tage bis zur Wahl am 10. Februar 2009, so dass den beiden neuen Partnern nicht mehr viel Zeit bleibt, sich über die gemeinsame Wahlliste zu einigen. 3 .
Recommended publications
  • Post-Election Coalition Scenarios, Part II by David Eden
    Post-Election Coalition Scenarios, Part II by David Eden Two other parties that may be possible coalition partners: · United Torah Judaism – Essentially, it is only concerned with internal issues. Its real demand is maintaining social services and allowances for their constituents. Other issues: Maintaining the powers of the Orthodox Rabbinical Courts over civil issues such as marriage, divorce, burial, etc. are among their top priorities, along with maintaining the Sabbath laws preventing work on the “Holy Day”, laws keeping ultra-Orthodox youth out of army service, etc. Although their constituency is sympathetic to the settlers and the Right, the leadership stresses that they are willing to support any coalition that accedes to their demands. As Olmert does not need them to guarantee the stability of the coalition, he won’t be “courting” them. Some of the issues that may affect their position in coalition negotiations are their rivalry with Shas and their often-confrontational relations with Meretz and groups within the Labor party over freedom of religion. · Meretz – The party that is the Israeli equivalent of the “Democratic wing of the Democratic Party”, Meretz and its predecessors have been at the forefront of not only the contacts that led to direct negotiations between Israel and the PLO (and the ensuing Oslo Accords), but from the earliest days after the creation of the State of Israel also have led the struggle for equal rights for Israel’s Arab citizens, labor & union rights, women’s rights, freedom of the press and freedom of religion issues, gay rights, etc. It endorses negotiated withdrawal from almost all of the West Bank, including parts of Jerusalem.
    [Show full text]
  • Whose Side Are We On? Viewers’ Reactions to the Use of Irony in News Interviews
    Pragmatics 25:2. 149-178 (2015) International Pragmatics Association DOI: 10.1075/prag.25.2.02hir WHOSE SIDE ARE WE ON? VIEWERS’ REACTIONS TO THE USE OF IRONY IN NEWS INTERVIEWS Galia Hirsch Abstract This research seeks to identify and analyze the reaction to irony in Israeli political news interviews, in view of the specific nature of this genre, which has been known to allow a certain level of adversarialness (Liebes et al. 2008; Blum-Kulka 1983; Weizman 2008; Clayman &Heritage 2002a and 2002b). Our intention was to examine whether the audience regards the use of irony as over-aggressive, and whether they believe interviewees regard it as such, in order to shed light on the potential consequences the use of indirect discourse patterns has for the interviewer. Based on Goffman's (1981) notion of footing, and on the concept of positioning as defined by Weizman (2008: 16), we focused on the audience's capacity to grasp the positioning and repositioning in the interaction as a possible influential factor in their reaction to the employment of irony. The research is based on two conceptual paradigms: Media studies and pragmatic studies of irony. The findings indicate that Israeli audiences tend to regard interviewers' employment of irony in political interviews as slightly hostile, and as such it is viewed as a possible threat to interviewees' face (Goffman 1967), but also as a legitimate and comprehensible tool, especially when the irony is accompanied by humor or mitigating non-verbal signs. Hence, the risk for the interviewer is not as great as we assumed.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel and Overseas: Israeli Election Primer 2015 (As Of, January 27, 2015) Elections • in Israel, Elections for the Knesset A
    Israel and Overseas: Israeli Election Primer 2015 (As of, January 27, 2015) Elections In Israel, elections for the Knesset are held at least every four years. As is frequently the case, the outgoing government coalition collapsed due to disagreements between the parties. As a result, the Knesset fell significantly short of seeing out its full four year term. Knesset elections in Israel will now be held on March 17, 2015, slightly over two years since the last time that this occurred. The Basics of the Israeli Electoral System All Israeli citizens above the age of 18 and currently in the country are eligible to vote. Voters simply select one political party. Votes are tallied and each party is then basically awarded the same percentage of Knesset seats as the percentage of votes that it received. So a party that wins 10% of total votes, receives 10% of the seats in the Knesset (In other words, they would win 12, out of a total of 120 seats). To discourage small parties, the law was recently amended and now the votes of any party that does not win at least 3.25% of the total (probably around 130,000 votes) are completely discarded and that party will not receive any seats. (Until recently, the “electoral threshold,” as it is known, was only 2%). For the upcoming elections, by January 29, each party must submit a numbered list of its candidates, which cannot later be altered. So a party that receives 10 seats will send to the Knesset the top 10 people listed on its pre-submitted list.
    [Show full text]
  • Master of the Science of Law
    TO CONCUR, OR NOT TO CONCUR: THAT IS THE QUESTION: THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL QUESTIONS REGARDING THE JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE OF JUDGES APPOINTED TEMPORARILY TO THE ISRAELI SUPREME COURT A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE STANFORD PROGRAM IN INTERNATIONAL LEGAL STUDIES AT THE STANFORD LAW SCHOOL, STANFORD UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF THE SCIENCE OF LAW By Binyamin Blum © May 2006 Please do not cite without permission of author ABSTRACT In many democratic societies, judicial tenure is perceived to be an important safeguard for the judiciary’s independence. In Israel, although judicial tenure is secured under Basic Law: The Judiciary, the promotion of judges from Israel’s District Courts to the Supreme Court is usually preceded by a temporary appointment. In practice, this temporary appointment serves as a “probationary period” after which the judges are considered for the permanent position of Associate Justice. One of the important implications of this promotion system is that while serving on Israel’s highest court, temporarily appointed judges continue to depend on external forces to retain their offices. Therefore, I argue that from a theoretical standpoint, temporary appointments pose a substantial threat to the judicial independence of individual judges. Because of the significant role played by Supreme Court Justices in the appointment process, I identify the threat to judicial independence as primarily originating within the judiciary, rather than from other branches of government. The major objective of this study is to examine the degree to which the theoretical threat to internal judicial independence can be seen to materialize in the Israeli Supreme Court example.
    [Show full text]
  • THE STATE of ISRAEL 70 YEARS of INDEPENDENCE - Building a Nation
    1 The Zionist General Council Session XXXVII/4 THE STATE OF ISRAEL 70 YEARS OF INDEPENDENCE - Building a Nation October 2018 2 Plenary No. 1 - Opening of the Zionist General Council Session Eli Cohen opened the first session and thanked the members of the audit committee and praised the auditor and his team, who - in their attempt to reach a level of satisfaction, which all can find to be acceptable - see all the flaws and improvements. Rabbi Yehiel Wasserman was invited to the stage for a ceremony conferring honorary fellowships to various members for their activities in the Zionist movement and their significant contribution to shaping its path and activities. This year, thanks to the WZO’s extensive activity over the past decade, quite a few people will be receiving this status. Honorary fellows are highly motivated individuals who have devoted many years of their time to the Zionist movement and who are role models for the next generation. Rabbi Wasserman then thanked the members of the Committee for Honorary Fellows: Barbara Goldstein, Silvio Joskowicz, Dalia Levy, Karma Cohen, Hernan Felman, Jacques Kupfer and Nava Avissar, the committee’s coordinator, for their dedicated work. Honorary Fellows: Mrs. Ana Marlene Starec – Mrs. Starec has been active in the Zionist movement for the past 54 years. She has been serving as Honorary President of WIZO for many years now and is also engaged in advocacy activities for Israel in the Diaspora in general, and with the Jewish communities of Brazil, in particular. Her human rights activities earned her a medal from the state of Rio de Janeiro, and she has also received a medal from the French Senate for her activities for humanity.
    [Show full text]
  • NGO Comments on the Initial Israeli State Report on Implementing the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child
    NGO Comments on the Initial Israeli State Report on Implementing the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ A Mixed Bag: Lawmaking to Promote Children’s Rights, Ongoing Discrimination, and Many Serious Violations ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Prepared for the Pre-sessional Working Group UN Committee on the Rights of the Child – 31st Session by Defense for Children International – Israel Section in consultation with members of The Israeli Children's Rights Coalition April 2002 DCI-Israel and Coalition page 2 NGO Report This NGO Report was prepared by Defense for Children International – Israel in consultation with members of the Israeli Children’s Rights Coalition. However, this report represents the views of DCI – Israel alone. Members of the Israel Children’s Rights Coalition do not necessarily support all aspects of the Report. A preliminary draft report written by Hephzibah Levine was circulated among coalition members. The contributions and comments by members of the Israel Children’s Rights Coalition have been integrated into the report by Dr. Philip Veerman, who also did a systematic analysis of the implementation of all of the articles of the CRC, further research and rewriting. Radda Barnen (Swedish Save the Children) and the Haella Foundation in the Netherlands contributed financial support for the production of this report by DCI – Israel in cooperation with the NGO’s. ISBN 965-90445-0-X © All Rights Reserved by Defense for Children International-Israel, Jerusalem, 2002 Deposited at the Register of Publications in the Israel Center for Libraries, Bnai Brak. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise without the prior written permission of the publisher, the Israel section of Defense for Children International, (DCI- Israel) P.O Box 8028, Jerusalem, 92384, Israel.
    [Show full text]
  • Contributor Biographies
    155 Contributor Biographies Rabbi Rachel Adler, PhD, is the Ellenson Professor of Modern Jewish Thought at Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion in Los Angeles. She was one of the first to bring feminist perspectives to bear on Jewish texts and law. Her book Engendering Judaism (1998) is the first by a female theologian to win a National Jewish Book Award for Jewish Thought. Hadeel Azzam-Jalajel, who was raised in Nazareth, was at the time of writing this essay co-director of the Racism Crisis Center and a lawyer with a private legal practice. She is a grad- uate of the Law School of the Hebrew University in Jerusalem. She interned at the civil rights organization Hamoked: Center for the Defense of the Individual, and since passing the bar in March of 2014, she has focused on administrative and constitu- tional law. Hadeel is a social and political activist, and a member of the leadership of the Jewish-Arab movement Standing Together, which works to promote peace, equality, and social justice. She also works as a content manager in both Hebrew and Arabic for the movement. Ruth Calderon, PhD, is a former member of the Israeli Knesset, former vice-speaker of the Knesset of the opposition party Yesh Atid, a Jewish educator, and Talmud scholar. In 1989, she founded Beit Midrash ELUL and, in 1996, the secular Beit Midrash for He- brew Culture, ALMA. She served as the head of the Division for Culture and Education of the Israeli National Library and on the faculty of the Mandel Institute for Nonprofit Leadership, where she also belonged to the first cohort of students to finish the program.
    [Show full text]
  • September 20
    Israeli Elections Bulletin | September 20 On 17 September Israelis voted for the second time in five months. Our final bulletin analyses the results and asks what happens next. Final Election Results Netanyahu fails to win 61 seat majority With nearly 100 per cent of the votes counted in the Israeli general election, Benny Gantz’s Blue and White party beat Benjamin Netanyahu’s Likud by two seats (33-31), Avigdor Liberman’s Yisrael Beitenu party won 8 seats, compared to 5 in April, retaining its position as the kingmaker of any future coalition. Overall the centre-left/Arab bloc of parties outperformed the right-wing/ultra- Orthodox bloc by two seats - 57 to 55 with Lieberman’s party currently on the fence. 69.4 per cent of eligible voters turned out to vote, an increase of 1.5 per cent compared to April’s election. The key results of the election were the surge in support for Lieberman which was likely fuelled by moderate right-wing voters, perhaps previous Kulanu voters, who decided not to support Likud. The increased support for Arab parties was also crucial and voter turnout in Arab communities was much higher, at 60 per cent compared to 49 per cent in April. It’s possible the higher voter turnout was a reaction to Netanyahu’s proposal to put cameras in polling stations in Arab communities and his repeated allegations of Arab voter fraud. Netanyahu’s call yesterday for immediate national unity talks with Gantz were rebuffed by the Blue and White leader, who declared victory and said his party would “not be dictated to.” Gantz re-stated his intention to form a broad and liberal unity government.
    [Show full text]
  • 6Eneral Assembly Distr
    UNITED NATIONS 6eneral Assembly Distr. GENERAL A/47/255 3 June 1992 ENGLISH ORIGINAL: ARABIC -Forty-seventli'sessiijn- Item 73 of the preliminary list* UNITED NATIONS RELIEF AND WORKS AGENCY FOR PALESTINE REFUGEES IN THE NEAR EAST Letter dated 3 June 1992 from the Charge d'affaires a.i. gf the Permanent Mission of the Syrian Arab Reoublica & United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General On instructions from my Government, I have the honour to transmit herewith the statement issued by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Syrian Arab Republic concerning Israeli practices affecting the human rights of the Syrian Arab citizens in the occupied Syrian Golan area submitted to the Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices Affecting the Human Rights of the Palestinian People and Other Arabs of the Occupied Territories during its visit to the Syrian Arab Republic from 31 April to 1 May 1992. I should be grateful if you would have this statement circulated as an official document of the General Assembly under item 73 of the preliminary list. (Sisned) Issa AWAD Minister Plenipotenti'& Charge d'affaires a.i. * A/47/50. 92-23778 3199i (E) 080692 100692 100692 / . A/47/255 English Page 2 Israeli Practices Affectina tha Human RiGhta nf the Palestinian Peoole and other Ar&,s of the OccunieS Territories during. 1991 The Israeli authorities are continuing their flagrant and deliberate violation of the norms of international law, the Charter of the United Nations, the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907, the fourth Geneva Convention of 1949 relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, the International Convention on the Elimintion of All Forms of Racial Discrimination of 1965 and other international instruments.
    [Show full text]
  • Election Wrap-Up: Was the 2019 Campaign Meretz's Last?
    Election Wrap-up: Was the 2019 Campaign Meretz’s Last? Return to Israel Horizons main page At first glance, Israel’s April 9, 2019 Knesset elections seemed to produce little change from the standpoint of Meretz, the party apparently ending the 2019 campaign with four seats (barely missing a fifth). True, that’s a drop of one compared to the five it had in the outgoing Knesset, but its losses were trivial compared to the Labor Party’s catastrophic 18-seat freefall, which came amid the mass migration of center-left voters to former Chief of Staff Benny Gantz’s new Blue and White party (Israel’s latest centrist flavor of the month). What’s more, just like last time, Meretz is headed for the opposition benches, where it will do all it can to minimize the ravages of what is shaping up to be another right-wing/religious/Haredi government led by Binyamin Netanyahu. And the faces won’t be new, either: Meretz’s four incoming Knesset members are all incumbents – Tamar Zandberg, Ilan Gilon, Michal Rozin, and Esawi Freige – back to serve an additional term. But probe a little deeper, and one can see that the results of this election could be the harbinger of some dramatic shifts, especially with regard to the still-taboo possibility of sweeping Jewish-Arab integration in Israeli politics. Party leader Zandberg hinted at the possible new direction when she addressed Meretz activists on election night, following the publication of the exit polls: “The future of the Israeli left,” she said, “is Jewish-Arab partnership … Unless Israeli politics treats all the country’s citizens equally, there’s no future.” Days later, as the dust settled, Zandberg elaborated on the message, writing in an e-blast to supporters that a “new Israeli left … must include true Jewish-Arab partnership – social, civil, and political” [emphasis added].
    [Show full text]
  • Meretz Calls for Cease-Fire Efforts
    Meretz Calls For Cease-fire Efforts Two days in advance of current news reports that Secretary of State Rice is embarking on a mission to broker a cease-fire, and the Israeli government is welcoming the prospect of a multi-national force along the border with Lebanon, the Meretz party has announced its position on the conflict. — R. Seliger This statement of July 22, from the Meretz party website, is translated by Sol Salbe of the Independent Middle East News Service, sponsored by the Australian Jewish Democratic Society. This service “concentrates on providing alternative information, chiefly from Israeli sources.” Salbe notes: “This is a significant development. A mere ten days after the Hezbollah attack and the commencement of the Israeli operations, a predominantly Jewish-Israeli party has broken ranks in Israel…. “Note also that, unlike Olmert, Bush and Howard [Australia’s prime minister], Meretz is not calling for the disarmament of Hezbollah, but something much more achievable (not too mention sensible.)….” The Meretz-Yahad Management Committee: 1) Is of the opinion that Israel has right to act, in a manner conforming to the state’s values, against those who impinge upon its sovereignty. Our in- principle support for a response should not be taken as endorsement of every operation, particularly those which are disproportional, such as attacks on civilian concentrations and the regional infrastructure in the Gaza Strip and Lebanon. 2) Expresses empathy with the people of the north and Negev and demands that the government ensures that those residents do not suffer financial hardship in addition to the heavy price that they are paying in terms of their security.
    [Show full text]
  • In Contemporary Israeli Politics and the Israel-Palestinian Conflict
    The "ethnic-split" in contemporary Israeli Politics and the Israel-Palestinian Conflict Roy Duer January 5th, 2016 Contents Introduction...........................................................................................................................3 1. Intergroup Relations in Israeli Society……......................................................................9 Ashkenazi-Mizrahi Relations............................................................................................9 Early relations and Mizrahi marginalization..................................................................9 Social Identity Theory – Mizrahi Protest and Assimilation.........................................10 Current Mizrahi Subjective Belief Structure...............................................................12 Mizrahi-Arab Relations...................................................................................................14 Early Capitalizing on the Ethnic Dimension of Israeli Society.......................................16 The Consolidation of Israeli-Mizrahi Identity.................................................................21 2. Israel's Political System in the Increasing Discursive Battle……..................................25 Ethno-National and Liberal Attitudes since the 2009 Elections......................................26 Netanyahu's Tenure – Winning Three Elections..............................................................29 The 2009 Elections......................................................................................................29
    [Show full text]