The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station 123 HUNTINGTON STREET BOX 1106 NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT 06504 Founded 1875 Putting science to work for society CONNECTICUT REPORT TO THE EASTERN PLANT BOARD - 2013 HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA SUMMARY OF 2012 NURSERY INSPECTIONS, FOREST INSECT/PLANT PEST SURVEYS ~~~~~~~~~~ NURSERY INSPECTION AND CERTIFICATION Three-hundred six nurseries were certified to conduct intra- and interstate business. There were 697 nursery inspections during the growing season. NURSERY INSECTS and DISEASES. The most important diseases and pests found in nurseries (in order of prevalence) were boxwood blight, aphids on various trees and shrubs, Fletcher scale on Taxus and arborvitae, imported willow leaf beetle, and lily leaf beetle. JAPANESE BEETLE CERTIFICATION. We observed treatments of 39 plants at two nurseries and issued phytosanitary certificates to comply with states that quarantine nursery stock from Connecticut because of the Japanese beetle, Popillia japonica. Seven nurseries met other requirements of the United States Japanese Beetle Harmonization Plan and shipped 2,749 plants to states that quarantine plants from Connecticut. JAPANESE BEETLE CERTIFICATION TO CANADA. Six Connecticut nurseries, which met the inspection requirements of the US/Canada Japanese Beetle Harmonization Plan, shipped 32,678 plants to Canada in 2012. NURSERY DEALER PERMITS. Nursery dealer permits were issued to 159 firms. One-hundred twenty six of these companies operate individual outlets. The remaining businesses have more than one outlet each. In total, there were 575 outlets. Report to the Eastern Plant Board 1 Connecticut 2013 PHYTOSANITARY CERTIFICATES. Three-hundred and eighty phytosanitary inspection certificates were issued covering the shipment of the following plant materials to destinations outside the United States: Product Quantity Apples (Cartons) 2,000 Bulbs & Tubers (Dahlia & Gladiolas)(# Bags) 331 Chinese tree peonies (plants) 36 Greenhouse plants 276 Nursery stock (containers - B & B) 31,088 Orchids (plants) 2,955 Perennials (bare root plants) 667 Seeds (cartons & bags) 1,883 Tobacco (bales, boxes, bundles & cartons) 173,064 Walnut shells (bags and drums) 325 SPECIAL INSPECTIONS. Twelve inspections were made for 207 individual plants and bulbs to assist homeowners moving out of state. One-hundred sixty-three inspections were made to assist nurseries moving the following plants interstate: Product Quantity Perennials (plants) 10 Nursery stock (containers) 1,293 (bare root plants) 1,280 Chinese tree peonies (plants) 5 Greenhouse plants 1,377 Orchids 38 Seed (# Bags) 114 There were two Post-Entry Quarantine sites approved in CT in 2012. BIOTECHNOLOGY REGULATORY SERVICES INSPECTION ACTIVITY. In cooperation with officers from the Wallingford USDA-APHIS-PPQ office, eight inspections were conducted in 2012 at facilities or laboratories working with recombinant or regulated organisms. PERMITS TO MOVE LIVE PLANT PESTS, NOXIOUS WEEDS, AND SOIL. In 2012, there were ninety- nine PPQ 526 Permits (Permit to move live plant pests, noxious weeds, and soil) approved in CT. There were two PPQ 525 Permits (Permit to move soil) approved in CT. FOREST HEALTH During the summer of 2012, we examined 51 permanent, one-acre forest plots that were established to monitor forest health in Connecticut. These plots are located on state, Nature Conservancy, and municipal water company properties. We considered 25 pathogens for monitoring and determined which trees served as host plants. Within each plot, 20 to 30 trees were tagged for long-term studies. We evaluated signs of defoliation and disease, such as dead tree branches, limbs and crowns. Descriptions and determinations are designed to reflect increasing damage or tree decline. We measure Report to the Eastern Plant Board 2 Connecticut 2013 the trees at Diameter at Breast Height (DBH) as an additional way to monitor their health. We will continue to use these plots to monitor the forests over several years to assess whether our state forests remain healthy or are declining. In general, our forests remain healthy. ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS. Winter of 2011-2012 was nearly snowless; in some areas of CT there were only one or two measurable snow events. The dry conditions persisted through spring 2012, with less than 2 inches of rain in both February and March. Rainfall levels approached normal through the remainder of the spring and summer. Superstorm Sandy struck CT on October 29, 2012, with heavy rain, high winds, and strong tide surges in coastal areas. Many trees were toppled and many more sustained damage to branches and crowns, due to easterly winds of 60 to 80 miles per hour. Foliage was tattered and damaged by salt spray, especially in coastal areas. Conifers, such as pine, spruce, and hemlock, sustained the most damage, with many trees breaking off several feet up the trunk. The effects of this hurricane will be felt in years to come, as damage to trees from breakage will be reflected in increased tree mortality and susceptibility to diseases and insect pests. INSECT AND DISEASE SURVEYS BOXWOOD BLIGHT. First discovered in Middlesex County, CT in November 2011, boxwood blight, caused by the fungus Cylindrocladium pseudonaviculatum, continues to be an issue for both nurseries and landscapes. This disease was new to CT and to the US. In 2012, action concerning boxwood blight was taken at 12 nurseries and garden centers; of one hundred thirty four samples, forty three were positive. Disposal of affected plants is ongoing; to date, approximately 100,000 plants have been destroyed by burial or dumpster. Also in 2012, CAES scientists documented that the fungus also infects Pachysandra terminalis, a popular landscape plant often planted with boxwood. Again, this discovery was new to science. Currently, boxwood blight in landscapes, of both boxwood and pachysandra, are the focus of our efforts. Six inspections of landscapes were conducted, with four hundred ten samples collected; two hundred thirty seven were positive. In most cases, affected plants have been removed and the area disinfected as much as possible by removal of plant material. In at least two cases, entire established landscapes have been removed and replanted with other species of plants. Efforts are under way to educate landscapers about boxwood blight and its consequences. IMPATIENS DOWNY MILDEW. Downy mildew of impatiens became evident in CT in mid-July, with extensive sudden defoliation of almost all impatiens. This disease, caused by Plasmopara obducens, was widespread and severe in both nurseries and residential plantings. Consequently, almost all producers of impatiens decided against growing the plants for the 2013 season, and growers and gardeners alike are searching for a reasonable replacement for this popular shade-loving plant. CHRYSANTHEMUM WHITE RUST. In 2012 we inspected 87,721 plants for CWR, caused by Puccinia horiana. Two hundred seventeen plants were found to be positive, and were destroyed. Report to the Eastern Plant Board 3 Connecticut 2013 GYPSY MOTH. There was no observable defoliation due to Gypsy Moth recorded in CT in 2012. During egg mass surveys in winter 2012-2013, very few viable egg masses were found. In November and December 2012, a gypsy moth egg mass survey was conducted in 80-95% favorable host sites on a 7-mile grid (102 sites) throughout Connecticut. No viable egg masses were found. ASIAN LONGHORNED BEETLE. We conducted thirty nine inspections of 3,860 trees in all counties of CT for presence or signs of ALB infestation. HEMLOCK WOOLLY ADELGID. During 2012, we required all hemlock nursery stock that was being shipped out of Connecticut to be treated for Hemlock woolly adelgid. Three nurseries shipped hemlock trees out of state. Our inspectors observed treatments and issued phytosanitary certificates to cover 1,253 plants in these shipments. RAMORUM LEAF BLIGHT. As part of the P. ramorum National Nursery Survey, we inspected 20 nurseries during 2012. During this survey 179,162 plants were inspected and 180 samples from symptomatic plants were submitted for lab analysis. All samples were cultured and tested by ELISA; DNA from ELISA-positive samples was sent to Beltsville for PCR confirmation. Sixty one samples, about 33 %, were ELISA-positive, indicating the presence of Phytophthora sp. All samples from the nurseries were negative for P. ramorum. An aquatic survey was done in conjunction with the US Forest Service. The stream selected for survey surrounds a 400-acre production nursery that has been implicated in P. ramorum trace-back activity. One location upstream of the nursery and one location downstream were baited with rhododendron leaves during April through September 2012; the baiting period was about 2 weeks each month, with a hiatus during June and July when the water temperature exceeded 20o C. Leaf baits were submitted for testing to labs at the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture and at Cornell University. While many leaf baits were positive for Phytophthora species, all leaf baits were negative for P. ramorum. There was one trace-forward action involving P. ramorum in CT in 2012. Host material was shipped to one nursery. Two samples were collected, and determined to be negative for presence of P. ramorum. No further action was taken. DAYLILY RUST. During 2012, we surveyed daylilies in nurseries and garden centers for signs of daylily rust, caused by Puccinia hemerocallidis. Ninety seven inspections (72,543 plants) were carried out; eighty plants were found to be positive and were destroyed. APIARY INSPECTION. There are currently six hundred ten registered beekeepers maintaining four thousand four hundred eighty six hives. In 2012, four hundred five hives were opened for inspection on 112 site visits to beeyards in CT. Fifty three samples from failing hives were sent to the USDA Bee Lab in Beltsville, MD, for determination. Varroa mite was detected in forty, Nosema in nine, and tracheal mites in one. Four reported chemical kills were investigated. Small hive beetle is a growing problem in CT; with adults overwintering. Small hive beetle has been confirmed in Fairfield and Middlesex Counties. Colony collapse disorder has never been confirmed to occur.
Recommended publications
  • Thysanoptera: Thripidae
    Preferences of Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood 1919 (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) for different structures of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) plants in the Magdalena warm valley of Colombia Preferencias de Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood 1919 (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) por diferentes estructuras de la planta del algodón (Gossypium hirsutum L.) en el valle cálido del Magdalena Everth Ebratt1*, Andrés Rodríguez2, Buenaventura Monje2, Edgar Varón2, Helena Brochero3, and Arturo Goldarazena4 ABSTRACT RESUMEN Thrips samples were collected from cotton crops in the Andean En la región Andina que comprende el valle cálido del alto region of the Magdalena warm valley, an area represented by the Magdalena representado por los departamentos de Tolima, Colombian departments of Tolima, Huila and Cundinamarca. Huila y Cundinamarca en Colombia se recolectaron muestras Ten cotton plants were randomly selected per hectare in each de trips en cultivos de algodón. En cada predio se selecciona- plot. Five young leaves, five floral buds, five opened flowers ron diez plantas de algodón al azar por hectárea en las cuales and five bolls or fruits were inspected. Immature stages were se inspeccionaron cinco hojas jóvenes o terminales foliares, separated from the adults and a first classification was made cinco botones florales, cinco flores abiertas y cinco cápsulas o according to the present thrips morphotypes, separating the frutos. Los estados inmaduros se separaron de los adultos y se adults of possible S. dorsalis specimens from the others. T- hizo una primera clasificación de acuerdo a los morfotipos de Student and Kruskal-Wallis tests were performed in order trips presentes, separando los adultos de posibles especímenes to find statistical differences between the different evaluated de S.
    [Show full text]
  • Rhinoncomimus Latipes) Response to Varying Moisture and Temperature Conditions ⇑ Scott H
    Biological Control 83 (2015) 68–74 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Biological Control journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ybcon Mile-a-minute weed (Persicaria perfoliata) and weevil (Rhinoncomimus latipes) response to varying moisture and temperature conditions ⇑ Scott H. Berg a, Judith Hough-Goldstein a, , Ellen C. Lake b, Vincent D’Amico c a Department of Entomology and Wildlife Ecology, University of Delaware, 531 S. College Ave., Newark, DE 19716, USA b USDA-ARS Invasive Plant Research Laboratory, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33314, USA c US Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Department of Entomology and Wildlife Ecology, 531 S. College Ave., Newark, DE 19716, USA highlights graphical abstract Effectiveness of a biocontrol agent can vary with different abiotic conditions. Herbivory and moisture effects on mile-a-minute weed were tested in a greenhouse. Both water limitation and herbivory reduced mile-a-minute reproduction and growth. Results are consistent with observed resurging plant populations with high rainfall. article info abstract Article history: The combined effects of herbivory and water stress on growth and reproduction of mile-a-minute weed Received 30 September 2014 (Persicaria perfoliata (L.) H. Gross) were investigated in greenhouse trials over two years, with Accepted 13 January 2015 well-watered or water-limited plants either exposed or not exposed to herbivory by the mile-a-minute Available online 19 January 2015 weevil (Rhinoncomimus latipes Korotyaev). Moisture limitation and weevil herbivory significantly reduced the number of seeds produced by P. perfoliata, with the fewest seeds produced when both factors Keywords: were present. Seed weight was reduced by moisture limitation and weevil herbivory the second year, and Water stress seed viability was reduced by herbivory both years.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Sampling and Monitoring Methods for Beneficial Arthropods
    insects Review A Review of Sampling and Monitoring Methods for Beneficial Arthropods in Agroecosystems Kenneth W. McCravy Department of Biological Sciences, Western Illinois University, 1 University Circle, Macomb, IL 61455, USA; [email protected]; Tel.: +1-309-298-2160 Received: 12 September 2018; Accepted: 19 November 2018; Published: 23 November 2018 Abstract: Beneficial arthropods provide many important ecosystem services. In agroecosystems, pollination and control of crop pests provide benefits worth billions of dollars annually. Effective sampling and monitoring of these beneficial arthropods is essential for ensuring their short- and long-term viability and effectiveness. There are numerous methods available for sampling beneficial arthropods in a variety of habitats, and these methods can vary in efficiency and effectiveness. In this paper I review active and passive sampling methods for non-Apis bees and arthropod natural enemies of agricultural pests, including methods for sampling flying insects, arthropods on vegetation and in soil and litter environments, and estimation of predation and parasitism rates. Sample sizes, lethal sampling, and the potential usefulness of bycatch are also discussed. Keywords: sampling methodology; bee monitoring; beneficial arthropods; natural enemy monitoring; vane traps; Malaise traps; bowl traps; pitfall traps; insect netting; epigeic arthropod sampling 1. Introduction To sustainably use the Earth’s resources for our benefit, it is essential that we understand the ecology of human-altered systems and the organisms that inhabit them. Agroecosystems include agricultural activities plus living and nonliving components that interact with these activities in a variety of ways. Beneficial arthropods, such as pollinators of crops and natural enemies of arthropod pests and weeds, play important roles in the economic and ecological success of agroecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome ~ ~ Contents
    Shropshire Entomology – April 2011 (No.3) A bi-annual newsletter focussing upon the study of insects and other invertebrates in the county of Shropshire (V.C. 40) April 2010 (Vol. 3) Editor: Pete Boardman [email protected] ~ Welcome ~ Welcome to the 3rd edition of the Shropshire Entomology newsletter. By the time you receive this the recording season should be under way and hopefully those cold and miserable winter days will be but a mere memory. Also underway will be the Invertebrate challenge programme of training days, a three year project funded by The Heritage Lottery Fund and The Esmée Fairbairn Foundation, which will be running around 100 events in total concentrating on the identification of some of Shropshire’s most under-recorded and under-studied invertebrates. It will also enable Shropshire Entomology to continue for the next three years, as well as enable my involvement with the SEDN as manager of the invertebrate database. Many thanks once more to everyone who has contributed to this edition. It can only function as a ‘newsletter’ if people contribute articles of news and views, so please do consider submitting articles that relate to entomology in Shropshire or entomology in general. The deadline for submission of content for Vol. 4 is Friday 16th September 2011. Please feel free to pass this newsletter on to anyone you feel might be interested in it. Note – past newsletters will soon be able to be downloaded as PDF’s from www.invertebrate-challenge.org.uk. ~ Contents ~ The Keeled Skimmer Orthetrum coerulescens
    [Show full text]
  • Seasonal Emergence of Invasive Ambrosia Beetles in Western Kentucky in 2017©
    Seasonal emergence of invasive ambrosia beetles in Western Kentucky in 2017© Z. Viloria1, G. Travis1, W. Dunwell1,a and R. Villanueva2 1University of Kentucky, Department of Horticulture, 1205 Hopkinsville Street, Princeton, Kentucky 42445, USA; 2University of Kentucky, Department of Entomology, 1205 Hopkinsville St., U.K. Research & Education Center, Princeton, Kentucky 42445, USA. NATURE OF WORK Xylosandrus crassiusculus (granulate ambrosia beetle, GAB) and X. germanus (black stem borer, BSB) are considered the most destructive insect pests to the nursery crop industry. These beetles usually mass attack nursery crops in spring, causing important loss due to the negative effect on the plant growth, aesthetic, economic value and unmarketable tree quality (Ranger et al., 2016). Ambrosia beetles bore sapwood and inoculate the galleries with fungi, which are collectively named as ambrosia fungi. These fungi are derived from plant pathogens in the ascomycete group identified as ophiostomatoid fungi (Farrell et al., 2001). Ambrosial fungus garden is the food source for ambrosia beetles and larvae. According to the field and container nursery growers of southeastern USA, GAB was ranked third as a key pest, 18% nursery growers identified it as prevalent and difficult to control. In Tennessee, Cnestus mutilatus (camphor shot borer, CSB) was found widely distributed and considered a new pest for nursery crops with unknown magnitude of damage (Oliver et al., 2012). Camphor shot borer was first reported from Kentucky in 2013, although a single specimen was found in Whitley Co., it was believed it would be everywhere in the state due to its wide spread in the neighboring states (Leavengood, 2013). The main objective of this study was to determine the phenology of the most abundant invasive ambrosia beetles in western Kentucky.
    [Show full text]
  • Autographa Gamma
    1 Table of Contents Table of Contents Authors, Reviewers, Draft Log 4 Introduction to the Reference 6 Soybean Background 11 Arthropods 14 Primary Pests of Soybean (Full Pest Datasheet) 14 Adoretus sinicus ............................................................................................................. 14 Autographa gamma ....................................................................................................... 26 Chrysodeixis chalcites ................................................................................................... 36 Cydia fabivora ................................................................................................................. 49 Diabrotica speciosa ........................................................................................................ 55 Helicoverpa armigera..................................................................................................... 65 Leguminivora glycinivorella .......................................................................................... 80 Mamestra brassicae....................................................................................................... 85 Spodoptera littoralis ....................................................................................................... 94 Spodoptera litura .......................................................................................................... 106 Secondary Pests of Soybean (Truncated Pest Datasheet) 118 Adoxophyes orana ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • EPPO Reporting Service
    ORGANISATION EUROPEENNE EUROPEAN AND MEDITERRANEAN ET MEDITERRANEENNE PLANT PROTECTION POUR LA PROTECTION DES PLANTES ORGANIZATION EPPO Reporting Service NO. 1 PARIS, 2021-01 General 2021/001 New data on quarantine pests and pests of the EPPO Alert List 2021/002 Update on the situation of quarantine pests in the Russian Federation 2021/003 Update on the situation of quarantine pests in Tajikistan 2021/004 Update on the situation of quarantine pests in Uzbekistan 2021/005 New and revised dynamic EPPO datasheets are available in the EPPO Global Database Pests 2021/006 Anoplophora glabripennis eradicated from Austria 2021/007 Popillia japonica is absent from Germany 2021/008 First report of Scirtothrips aurantii in Spain 2021/009 Agrilus planipennis found in Saint Petersburg, Russia 2021/010 First report of Spodoptera frugiperda in Syria 2021/011 Spodoptera frugiperda found in New South Wales, Australia 2021/012 Spodoptera ornithogalli (Lepidoptera Noctuidae - yellow-striped armyworm): addition to the EPPO Alert List 2021/013 First report of Xylosandrus compactus in mainland Spain 2021/014 First report of Eotetranychus lewisi in mainland Portugal 2021/015 First report of Meloidogyne chitwoodi in Spain 2021/016 Update on the situation of the potato cyst nematodes Globodera rostochiensis and G. pallida in Portugal Diseases 2021/017 First report of tomato brown rugose fruit virus in Belgium 2021/018 Update on the situation of tomato brown rugose fruit virus in Spain 2021/019 Update on the situation of Acidovorax citrulli in Greece with findings
    [Show full text]
  • False Codling Moth Thaumatotibia Leucotreta
    Stone Fruit Commodity-Based Pest Survey False Codling Moth Thaumatotibia leucotreta Introduction False codling moth (Figure 1) is a significant pest because of its potential economic impact on many crops, including stone fruit, avocado, citrus, corn, cotton, and macadamia. It is not currently known to be present in the United States. Biology Depending on conditions, the false codling moth’s life cycle ranges from 30 to 174 days. It can produce from 2 to 10 generations each year, depending on multiple factors including temperature, food availability and quality, and humidity. To attract males, adult females release pheromones at FIGURE 1. Adult false codling moth (Thaumatotibia leucotreta). Photo courtesy of night. After the adults mate, the female deposits eggs on Pest and Diseases Image Library, Bugwood.org. host plants, either in batches or as single eggs. Later, the hatching larvae burrow into the rind of the host plant. Mature larvae spin cocoons and pupate before they emerge as adults. Symptoms False codling moth can attack stone fruit at any stage. Larvae can even develop in hard green fruit prior to application of control measures. Larvae burrow at the stem end into the fruit and cause damage by feeding around the stone. Damaged fruit can become vulnerable to secondary pests such as fungal organisms and scavengers. Peaches can be damaged by larvae beginning up to 6 weeks before harvest. False codling moth can also attack plants unsuitable for larvae development, such as avocado, causing lesions on fruit tissue and diminishing the marketability of fruit. Because false codling moth is an internal feeder, few symptoms are actually displayed by the larvae.
    [Show full text]
  • Callidiellum Rufipenne (Motschulsky, 1860) New Longhorn Beetle to the Fauna of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Slovenia (Coleoptera Cerambycidae)
    Biodiversity Journal, 2020, 11 (3): 761–763 https://doi.org/10.31396/Biodiv.Jour.2020.11.3.761.763 Callidiellum rufipenne (Motschulsky, 1860) new longhorn beetle to the fauna of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Slovenia (Coleoptera Cerambycidae) Aleksandar Đukić1 & Pierpaolo Rapuzzi2 1Scientific Research Society of Biology and Ecology Students “Josif Pančić”, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 2, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia; e-mail: [email protected] 2Via Cialla 48, 33040 Prepotto, Udine, Italy; e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT In this paper the authors record for the first time the invasive species Callidiellum rufipenne (Motschulsky, 1860) (Coleoptera Cerambycidae) for the fauna of the republics of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Slovenia. KEY WORDS Cerambycidae; Callidiellum; new record; Bosnia and Herzegovina; Slovenia. Received 14.07.2020; accepted 16.08.2020; published online 30.09.2020 INTRODUCTION RESULTS Invasive longhorn beetles (Coleoptera Ceram- Systematics bycidae) have been present in Europe for a rela- tively long time. However, in the last two to three Ordo COLEOPTERA Linnaeus, 1750 decades the number of these invasive insects in Eu- Superfamilia CHRYSOMELOIDEA Latreille, 1802 rope has risen exponentially due to increased inter- Familia CERAMBYCIDAE Latreille, 1802 national trade of goods which created new and rapid Tribus CALLIDIINI Mulsant, 1839 transport pathway opportunities (Cocquempot & Genus Callidiellum Linsley, 1940 Mifsud, 2013). To this effect, in these last twenty years, 19 species of alien longhorn beetles have been introduced and established in Europe, and Callidiellum rufipenne (Motschulsky, 1860) some 20 other species have been intercepted or recorded, but so far not naturalized (Cocquempot, EXAMINED MATERIAL. BOSNIA and HERZE- 2007; Cocquempot & Lindelöw, 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • Summer Fruit Tortrix Moth Adoxophyes Orana
    Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management/Division of Agriculture Cooperative Agricultural Pest Survey (CAPS) Summer Fruit Tortrix Moth Adoxophyes orana Native to Europe and Asia, the Summer Fruit Tortrix Moth is not known to occur in the U.S. The Summer Fruit Tortrix Moth is most commonly a pest of apple, cherry and pear trees; however it does have a large range of other hosts. Hania Arentsen, Garden Safari, www.forestryimages.org Identifying Features: Adults emerge from late May through late June, FEMALE: from loosely woven cocoons on host plants. Males have a V. Mastro, USDA, APHIS, PPQ 15-19 mm wingspan, with the forewings being light grayish- brown or yellowish-brown in color. They have distinct brown markings. Hind wings are light gray. Females have a 19-22 mm wingspan with dullish, gray-brown forewings and markings which are less distinct than those of males. Female hind wings are brownish-gray. These adults give rise to the first generation of larvae (summer caterpillars). The larvae are 18-22 mm long with a brown head. When mature the head turns a honey- yellow color. The thoracic legs are light brown and the MALE: overall color of the caterpillar is greenish yellow to olive V. Mastro, USDA, APHIS, PPQ green. These adults will produce the second generation of larvae (fall caterpillars) which will overwinter on plants until the following spring. Damage: • Caterpillars cause damage by feeding on the leaves and fruit. • Point-like holes are left in the fruit tissue by larvae. • Before overwintering, fall caterpillars may feed on fruit causing irregular depressions on the surface of the fruit.
    [Show full text]
  • PA 2013 Entomology Program Highlights
    Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture 2013 Entomology Program Summary The Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture (PDA) Entomology Program is responsible for the regulation of invasive insect plant pests, which includes survey, laboratory analysis, and control/mitigation when warranted. In 2013, the Entomology Program either conducted or actively participated in 14 invasive insect pest surveys across the Commonwealth. The laboratory received and processed 5,876 different insect samples and identified 124,674 specimens from these samples. Regardless of the survey, all samples were screened for Cerambycidae, Buprestidae, Scolytinae, Pentatomoidea, Siricidae, Symphyta, Apoidea (Referred to as PDA Pests), and other select species like Drosophila suzukii (Spotted Wing Drosophila), Sirex noctilio, Larinus turbinutus, Adelges tsugae (Hemlock Woolly Adelgid), and Pyrhalta viburni (Viburnum Leaf Beetle). In addition, several other non-targeted species were identified if they were unfamiliar to staff taxonomists. Entomology surveys are carried out by permanent and temporary PDA staff, as well as cooperating government and non-government collaborators. Insect samples are also submitted through cooperative extension, private industry, and the general public. ASIAN LONGHORNED BEETLE (ALB): This pest continues to be a top priority for Pennsylvania. ALB was declared eradicated from portions of New York, New Jersey, and Ontario in 2013. Unfortunately, new populations of ALB were discovered in New York and Ontario. Pennsylvania continues to screen all wood destroying insect samples for ALB, all of which were negative in 2013. In addition, ALB visual surveillance is performed as part of Pennsylvania’s Cooperative Agricultural Pest Survey. PDA also responds to a number of public reports for ALB each year. No ALB was detected in PA in 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitored Releases of Rhinoncomimus Latipes (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), a Biological Control Agent of Mile-A-Minute Weed (Persicaria Perfoliata), 2004–2008
    Biological Control 51 (2009) 450–457 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Biological Control journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ybcon Monitored releases of Rhinoncomimus latipes (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), a biological control agent of mile-a-minute weed (Persicaria perfoliata), 2004–2008 Judith Hough-Goldstein a,*, Mark A. Mayer b, Wayne Hudson b, George Robbins b, Patricia Morrison c, Richard Reardon d a Department of Entomology & Wildlife Ecology, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716-2160, USA b Phillip Alampi Beneficial Insect Laboratory, N.J. Dept. Agric., Trenton, NJ 08625, USA c Ohio River Islands National Wildlife Refuge, Williamstown, WV 26187, USA d USDA Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, Morgantown, WV 26505, USA article info abstract Article history: Mile-a-minute weed, Persicaria perfoliata (L.) H. Gross, is an invasive annual vine of Asian origin that has Received 2 April 2009 developed extensive monocultures, especially in disturbed open areas in the Mid-Atlantic region of the Accepted 13 August 2009 United States. A host-specific Asian weevil, Rhinoncomimus latipes Korotyaev, was approved for release Available online 19 August 2009 in North America in 2004, and weevils have been reared at the New Jersey Department of Agriculture Beneficial Insect Laboratory since then. By the end of 2007 more than 53,000 weevils had been reared Keywords: and released, mostly in New Jersey, but also in Delaware, Maryland, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia. Persicaria perfoliata The beetles established at 63 out of 65 sites (96.9%) where they were released between 2004 and Polygonum perfoliatum 2007, with successful releases consisting of as few as 200 weevils.
    [Show full text]