Russia-Poland Gas Relationship: Risks and Uncertainties of the Ever After

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Russia-Poland Gas Relationship: Risks and Uncertainties of the Ever After June 2020 Russia-Poland gas relationship: risks and uncertainties of the ever after 1. Introduction The existing long-term contracts (LTCs) between Poland and Russia for the transit and supply of natural gas are coming to an end, with the transit contract expiring on 17 May 2020. As suggested by a recent OIES insight, Russia’s requirements for Polish transit in the second half of 2020 could be secured by short-term bookings rather than a new long-term transit contract.1 Indeed, this is what happened at the beginning of May when Gazprom booked 80 per cent of capacity of the EuRoPol pipeline (the Polish segment of Yamal-Europe), under the new auction system for Q3 2020 when it will be needed to substitute for Nord Stream transit which will be halted in July for regular summer maintenance.2 Gazprom also secured a very advantageous transit tariff for Q3 20203 for the capacity which was offered by Gaz System, the Polish gas system operator, at its regular auctions, conducted under the EU Capacity Allocation Mechanism (CAM) network code. The capacity auctions for the second half of May have shown a high volatility of daily bookings: from relatively high utilization of available EuRoPol capacity (93 per cent on 19 May) to an almost complete cessation of flows (10 per cent of capacity on May 24-25 and no westward flow at Mallnow on 26 May). Gazprom has said that the flows depend on the nominations by its European customers, and it appears that Gazprom is treating EuRoPol as a balancing route and is content with this more flexible arrangement for the time being. Besides being a major transit country for Russian gas exports to Europe with about 33 Bcm per annum in transit via the EuRoPol pipeline, Poland has been the largest buyer of Russian gas in Central and Eastern Europe, purchasing about 10 Bcm per annum in recent years. The current Russia-Poland gas supply contract expires on 31 December 2022 and the Polish state-owned gas company, Polskie Gornictwo Naftowe i Gazowe (PGNiG), the main wholesale supplier of natural gas in the country, has officially informed Gazprom that it is not going to renew the LTC for gas supplies, since it is planning to switch to alternative deliveries of LNG and Norwegian pipeline gas. Thus, an important chapter in the history of Polish gas is coming to an end and a new era is beginning. Meanwhile, end-use consumption of natural gas in Poland has grown from 14.5 Bcm in 2010 to about 18.6 Bcm in 2019, an increase of more than 30 per cent, as the domestic gas network has expanded and new industrial, residential, and commercial customers have been connected to natural gas. Conversely, gas production in the country has been slowly declining. In 2019, Poland produced 1 Pirani, S., Sharples, J., Yafimova, K., Yermakov, V. Implications of the Russia-Ukraine gas transit deal for alternative pipeline routes and the Ukrainian and European markets. OIES Insight 65, March 2020, p.13 2 Nord Stream AG reported that from 14 July to 26 July 2020, the company will temporarily shut down both lines of its gas pipeline system for annual routine maintenance works. https://www.nord -stream.com/operations/transparencyremit/ 3 https://biznesalert.pl/gazprom-rosja-polska-jamal-gaz-system-energetyka/ Energy Insight: 70 Vitaly Yermakov, Senior Research Fellow OIES and Kamil Sobczak, expert, Russia Gas Society approximately 4.1 Bcm of natural gas (21 per cent of its total natural gas supply). Growing gas demand, stagnant/declining indigenous supply, and the approaching expiration of the long-term gas import contract with Russia have turned into a triple challenge for Polish decision-makers. As the urgency of the response has grown, the Polish government and PGNiG have placed their bets on the diversification of gas imports away from Russia, once a dominant supplier, and have achieved remarkable progress in eliminating Russian gas from Poland’s gas balance. In the early 2010s Gazprom deliveries accounted for 90 per cent of Poland’s total gas imports. The situation in 2019 was markedly different: of total Polish gas imports of 14.9 Bcm in 2019, pipeline gas from the Russian Federation was still the largest source with slightly over 9 Bcm (60 per cent of all gas imports and 48 per cent of total consumption), but a far cry from the recent past. Pipeline imports from the west and south (through newly established interconnectors with Germany, the Czech Republic, and Slovakia), increased from 2.7 million cubic meters per day (MMcm/d) in 2010 to 6.8 MMcm/d or 2.5 Bcm per annum in 2019. Poland’s LNG imports in 2019 were 3.4 Bcm. Since 2016, when the LNG terminal in Świnoujście, located on the Baltic Sea near the Polish-German border started its operations, LNG imports have grown from 2.6 MMcm/d to 9.3 MMcm/d in 2019, contributing 18 per cent of total supply and 23 per cent of total imports in 2019. Work to increase capacity at the 5 Bcm (14 MMcm/d) LNG terminal in Świnoujście by 50 per cent to 7.5 Bcm per annum was scheduled to conclude in late 2021, but is now likely to be pushed back to 2022 because of the COVID-19 pandemic. While the gas trade between Poland and Russia has lasted for over thirty years and brought considerable benefits to both countries, it has now reached the point when the whole relationship must undergo a profound transformation in response to the fundamental changes that have taken place in the European gas market with regards to pricing, key contractual principles, and the availability of competitive sources of supply of both pipeline gas and LNG. This Insight discusses the evolution of the Russia-Poland gas relationship, identifies the problems that have emerged, and assesses the opportunities and the risks for both sides stemming from the end of the long-term transit and supply contracts. The Insight also examines how new Russian pipelines and the changes in flows of Russian gas to Europe are likely to impact the transit of Russian gas via Poland and what this means for Poland’s energy security. 2. Brief overview of the history of Poland’s energy balance and the role of natural gas Poland’s energy balance has been always dominated by coal owing to plentiful indigenous reserves and production. Poland is Europe’s biggest hard coal producer and its coal resources are the largest in Europe. According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), the share of coal in Poland’s total primary energy supply (TPES) has declined considerably since the early 1990s when it accounted for well over 70 per cent, but coal remains the key energy supply source accounting for 47 per cent of the total in 2018. Coal provides more than two-thirds of the country’s heat and power generation. The share of natural gas has increased from a mere 8-9 per cent of TPES in the early 1990s to 15 per cent in 2018. About one-fifth of this is produced domestically, and four-fifths is imported. Wind and solar constitute only around 1 per cent of TPES. (See Figure 1) 2 The contents of this paper are the authors’ sole responsibility. They do not necessarily represent the views of the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies or any of its Members Figure 1: Shares of Poland’s primary energy supply sources, 1990–2018 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 Coal Natural gas Oil Wind and solar Source: OIES, data from IEA In absolute numbers, the total supply of natural gas was 16.1 million toe or 16.9 standard Bcm in 2018. (See Figure 2) Figure 2: Poland’s total primary energy supply (TPES), 1990–2018 120 100 80 60 Mtoe 40 20 0 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 Oil Coal Natural gas Bio-fuels and waste Hydro Solar and wind Source: OIES, data from IEA The IEA noted in its country report that greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions per gross domestic product (GDP) and carbon intensity in Poland are among the highest in IEA Europe member countries owing to old, inefficient, and polluting coal-fired plants.4 4 Energy Policies in IEA Countries – Poland. 2016 Review. IEA, 2017 p.10 3 The contents of this paper are the authors’ sole responsibility. They do not necessarily represent the views of the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies or any of its Members On the energy demand side, the transition to a market economy in Poland has resulted in enormous structural shifts in economic activity, away from a focus on heavy industry towards service-oriented sectors. As a result, the largest growth in energy consumption has occurred in the transportation sector as growing numbers of private cars and commercial trucks require more petroleum. At the same time, energy use by industry has declined considerably. Improved energy efficiencies have reduced the share of energy use by the residential sector. (See Figure 3) Figure 3: Shares of total final consumption (TFC) in Poland’s energy by sector 40 35 Transport share in TFC 30 Industry share in TFC 25 Residential share in TFC 20 Commercial and Percent public services share in TFC 15 Agriculture and forestry share in TFC 10 Non-energy use share in TFC 5 Share of electricity in TFC 0 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 Source: OIES, data from IEA Poland’s natural gas balance on the basis of the latest available statistics from the IEA is presented in Table 1.
Recommended publications
  • The Image of Poland in Russia Through the Prism of Historical Disputes
    THE IMAGE OF POLAND IN RUSSIA THROUGH THE PRISM OF HISTORICAL DISPUTES Report based on a public opinion poll carried out by the Levada Center in Russia for the Centre for Polish-Russian Dialogue and Understanding Warsaw 2020 Report on public opinion research THE IMAGE OF POLAND IN RUSSIA THROUGH THE PRISM OF HISTORICAL DISPUTES Report based on a public opinion poll carried out by the Levada Center in Russia for the Centre for Polish-Russian Dialogue and Understanding CENTRE FOR POLISH-RUSSIAN DIALOGUE Warsaw 2020 AND UNDERSTANDING Report on public opinion research THE IMAGE OF POLAND IN RUSSIA THROUGH THE PRISM OF HISTORICAL DISPUTES Survey: Levada Center Analyses and report: Łukasz Mazurkiewicz, Grzegorz Sygnowski (ARC Rynek i Opinia) Commentary: Łukasz Adamski, Ernest Wyciszkiewicz © Copyright by Centrum Polsko-Rosyjskiego Dialogu i Porozumienia 2020 Graphic design and typesetting: Studio 27 (www.studio27.pl) Cover photo: Lela Kieler/Adobe Stock ISBN 978-83-64486-79-1 Publisher The Centre for Polish-Russian Dialogue and Understanding 14/16A Jasna Street, 00-041 Warsaw, Poland tel. + 48 22 295 00 30 fax + 48 22 295 00 31 e-mail: [email protected] http://www.cprdip.pl Contents Commentary 4 Introduction – background and purpose of the study 8 Information about the study 9 Detailed findings 11 Summary 26 www.cprdip.pl 3 THE IMAGE OF POLAND IN RUSSIA THROUGH THE PRISM OF HISTORICAL DISPUTES Commentary By pursuing their particular, excessive ambi- peace in Europe, and of anti-semitism. Putin tions it was the politicians in interwar Poland played down to vanishing-point the totalitarian who submitted their nation, the Polish nation, to character of the USSR, its tactical coopera- the German war machine and generally contrib- tion with the Third Reich in destroying peace in uted to the outbreak of World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • James Albert Michener (1907-97): Educator, Textbook Editor, Journalist, Novelist, and Educational Philanthropist--An Imaginary Conversation
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 474 132 SO 033 912 AUTHOR Parker, Franklin; Parker, Betty TITLE James Albert Michener (1907-97): Educator, Textbook Editor, Journalist, Novelist, and Educational Philanthropist--An Imaginary Conversation. PUB DATE 2002-00-00 NOTE 18p.; Paper presented at Uplands Retirement Community (Pleasant Hill, TN, June 17, 2002). PUB TYPE Opinion Papers (120) EDRS PRICE EDRS Price MF01/PC01 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Authors; *Biographies; *Educational Background; Popular Culture; Primary Sources; Social Studies IDENTIFIERS *Conversation; Educators; Historical Research; *Michener (James A); Pennsylvania (Doylestown); Philanthropists ABSTRACT This paper presents an imaginary conversation between an interviewer and the novelist, James Michener (1907-1997). Starting with Michener's early life experiences in Doylestown (Pennsylvania), the conversation includes his family's poverty, his wanderings across the United States, and his reading at the local public library. The dialogue includes his education at Swarthmore College (Pennsylvania), St. Andrews University (Scotland), Colorado State University (Fort Collins, Colorado) where he became a social studies teacher, and Harvard (Cambridge, Massachusetts) where he pursued, but did not complete, a Ph.D. in education. Michener's experiences as a textbook editor at Macmillan Publishers and in the U.S. Navy during World War II are part of the discourse. The exchange elaborates on how Michener began to write fiction, focuses on his great success as a writer, and notes that he and his wife donated over $100 million to educational institutions over the years. Lists five selected works about James Michener and provides a year-by-year Internet search on the author.(BT) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document.
    [Show full text]
  • TGE and Pgnig Embark on Cooperation with a View to Developing a Biomethane Market in Poland
    Warsaw, 12 January 2021 TGE and PGNiG embark on cooperation with a view to developing a biomethane market in Poland Press Release On 12 January Towarowa Giełda Energii (TGE) and Polish Oil and Gas Company (PGNiG) signed a cooperation agreement aimed at leveraging their mutual expertise and capabilities in creating a biomethane market in Poland. TGE and PGNiG intend to jointly prepare modern solutions supporting the creation and development of a biomethane market in Poland. The expertise of both PGNiG, as a key player on the gas market, and of TGE as a trading platform where the trading in gas and certificates promoting the use of RES are concentrated, should contribute to the transformation of the energy market leading not only to increased significance of green technologies but also the emerging market for alternative fuels, such as biomethane or hydrogen. ‘For over 20 years, TGE has been supporting all transformation processes on the energy market and actively contributing to its development by offering its participants comprehensive solutions and products. The cooperation with PGNiG in creating a biomethane market is an opportunity for the Exchange to further develop the RES segment. Certainly, our registers have a key role to play in this project’ said Piotr Zawistowski, President of the Management Board of TGE. ‘PGNiG has been an active member of the gas exchange market since its inception and continues to contribute to its development, as evidenced, among other things, by the record-high volume of natural gas trading on TGE in 2020. Now we are about to a new chapter of cooperation, which will allow us to create modern market solutions in the field of biomethane trading.
    [Show full text]
  • A Short History of Poland and Lithuania
    A Short History of Poland and Lithuania Chapter 1. The Origin of the Polish Nation.................................3 Chapter 2. The Piast Dynasty...................................................4 Chapter 3. Lithuania until the Union with Poland.........................7 Chapter 4. The Personal Union of Poland and Lithuania under the Jagiellon Dynasty. ..................................................8 Chapter 5. The Full Union of Poland and Lithuania. ................... 11 Chapter 6. The Decline of Poland-Lithuania.............................. 13 Chapter 7. The Partitions of Poland-Lithuania : The Napoleonic Interlude............................................................. 16 Chapter 8. Divided Poland-Lithuania in the 19th Century. .......... 18 Chapter 9. The Early 20th Century : The First World War and The Revival of Poland and Lithuania. ............................. 21 Chapter 10. Independent Poland and Lithuania between the bTwo World Wars.......................................................... 25 Chapter 11. The Second World War. ......................................... 28 Appendix. Some Population Statistics..................................... 33 Map 1: Early Times ......................................................... 35 Map 2: Poland Lithuania in the 15th Century........................ 36 Map 3: The Partitions of Poland-Lithuania ........................... 38 Map 4: Modern North-east Europe ..................................... 40 1 Foreword. Poland and Lithuania have been linked together in this history because
    [Show full text]
  • Implementation of the Helsinki Accords Hearings
    BASKET III: IMPLEMENTATION OF THE HELSINKI ACCORDS HEARINGS BEFORE THE COMMISSION ON SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE NINETY-SEVENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION THE CRISIS IN POLAND AND ITS EFFECTS ON THE HELSINKI PROCESS DECEMBER 28, 1981 Printed for the use of the - Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 9-952 0 'WASHINGTON: 1982 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 COMMISSION ON SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE DANTE B. FASCELL, Florida, Chairman ROBERT DOLE, Kansas, Cochairman ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah SIDNEY R. YATES, Illinois JOHN HEINZ, Pennsylvania JONATHAN B. BINGHAM, New York ALFONSE M. D'AMATO, New York TIMOTHY E. WIRTH, Colorado CLAIBORNE PELL, Rhode Island MILLICENT FENWICK, New Jersey PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont DON RITTER, Pennsylvania EXECUTIVE BRANCH The Honorable STEPHEN E. PALMER, Jr., Department of State The Honorable RICHARD NORMAN PERLE, Department of Defense The Honorable WILLIAM H. MORRIS, Jr., Department of Commerce R. SPENCER OLIVER, Staff Director LYNNE DAVIDSON, Staff Assistant BARBARA BLACKBURN, Administrative Assistant DEBORAH BURNS, Coordinator (II) ] CONTENTS IMPLEMENTATION. OF THE HELSINKI ACCORDS The Crisis In Poland And Its Effects On The Helsinki Process, December 28, 1981 WITNESSES Page Rurarz, Ambassador Zdzislaw, former Polish Ambassador to Japan .................... 10 Kampelman, Ambassador Max M., Chairman, U.S. Delegation to the CSCE Review Meeting in Madrid ............................................................ 31 Baranczak, Stanislaw, founder of KOR, the Committee for the Defense of Workers.......................................................................................................................... 47 Scanlan, John D., Deputy Assistant Secretary for European Affairs, Depart- ment of State ............................................................ 53 Kahn, Tom, assistant to the president of the AFL-CIO ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • JAMES A. MICHENER Has Published More Than 30 Books
    Bowdoin College Commencement 1992 One of America’s leading writers of historical fiction, JAMES A. MICHENER has published more than 30 books. His writing career began with the publication in 1947 of a book of interrelated stories titled Tales of the South Pacific, based upon his experiences in the U.S. Navy where he served on 49 different Pacific islands. The work won the 1947 Pulitzer Prize, and inspired one of the most popular Broadway musicals of all time, Rodgers and Hammerstein’s South Pacific, which won its own Pulitzer Prize. Michener’s first book set the course for his career, which would feature works about many cultures with emphasis on the relationships between different peoples and the need to overcome ignorance and prejudice. Random House has published Michener’s works on Japan (Sayonara), Hawaii (Hawaii), Spain (Iberia), Southeast Asia (The Voice of Asia), South Africa (The Covenant) and Poland (Poland), among others. Michener has also written a number of works about the United States, including Centennial, which became a television series, Chesapeake, and Texas. Since 1987, the prolific Michener has written five books, including Alaska and his most recent work, The Novel. His books have been issued in virtually every language in the world. Michener has also been involved in public service, beginning with an unsuccessful 1962 bid for Congress. From 1979 to 1983, he was a member of the Advisory Council to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, an experience which he used to write his 1982 novel Space. Between 1978 and 1987, he served on the committee that advises that U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Ot Tlle Graduate Sohool Ot the University of Y.Anaas in Vartial Fulfi1lment
    A. H. Klassen, A.. B. Submit t,.ed to tbe De11artment of EnsJ.isll and the Faoul t.Y ot tlle Graduate SOhool ot the University of Y.anaas in vartial fulfi1lment. of t.be :x~equirement.u for tlle de0.t.'ee of Ya.star of Arts. -----------~----- Ap.p.l"OVed by; r_L.~ July ,1926. There is an advantage in atudying :literatures oom- 11aratively as well a.a by tllemaelvee. !'oliGh literature ia one of the so-called miuor 1i tera.tures of Europe about which. Ame1·icana .bave only a very 211peri'ioial knoi:;ledge. but v1hioh, nevertheless, deserves our attention both for the merit tliat it IJOaaesaea intrinsically and for tile im- . ;por~t place tl11;~t it ras attained in America. This th.es1a attemyta to ~;:e a sw:-vey o! vdm.t is beat in Polish l.i terature and to trace as much 01· 1 t a.a, througl1 translation Ol." ·through .tuatorical and Cl"itioal accounts_. has be.o-ome av-dilab.le to the Amei'ioan reader. Because it is of ten hard to. d1~~~ the . line, aort1e ..B1•i tiah a.a well as ..t\me.rican treatmenta of Polieh 1iteratu.re \1·111 be considered.. I am greatly indebted to .?rofeasor s. L. ~~tu tcomb for suggesting thia eubJeot to. me eJid for the invaluable help he has g1 ven me in gn. tller;DB and selecting the ·ma.- ter1a.l. I a.m al.ao indebted to Protesaor J. H.. l~elson for the aid be has given me in the £inal preparation of .the study.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Board's Report on Operations Of
    Asseco Group Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2019 Present in Sales revenues 56 countries 10 667 mPLN 26 843 Net profit attributable highly commited to the parent employees company's shareholders 322.4 mPLN Order backlog for 2020 5.3 bPLN 7 601 mPLN market capitalization 1) 1) As at December 30, 2019 Asseco Group in 2019 non-IFRS measures (unaudited data) Non-IFRS figures presented below have not been audited or reviewed by an independent auditor. Non-IFRS figures are not financial data in accordance with EU IFRS. Non-IFRS data are not uniformly defined or calculated by other entities, and consequently they may not be comparable to data presented by other entities, including those operating in the same sector as the Asseco Group. Such financial information should be analyzed only as additional information and not as a replacement for financial information prepared in accordance with EU IFRS. Non-IFRS data should not be assigned a higher level of significance than measures directly resulting from the Consolidated Financial Statements. Financial and operational summary: • Dynamic organic growth and through acquisitions – increase in revenues by 14.4% to 10 667.4 mPLN and in operating profit by 22.5% to 976.2 mPLN (1 204.4 mPLN EBIT non-IFRS – increase by 14.9%) • International markets are the Group’s growth engine – 89% of revenues generated on these markets • Double-digit increase in sales in the Formula Systems and Asseco International segments • 81% of revenues from the sales of proprietary software and services • Strong business diversification (geographical, sectoral, product) Selected consolidated financial data for 2019 on a non-IFRS basis For the assessment of the financial position and business development of the Asseco Group, the basic data published on a non-IFRS basis constitute an important piece of information.
    [Show full text]
  • European Economic Congress 2015 Agenda
    1 Agenda of the European Economic Congress 2015 Inaugural session 20 April 2015 10.00-18.00 The difficult Europe The effects of the crisis still impact the performance of economies and public finances of many European states. The spectre of stagnation is still there. Europe is burdened with unemployment and the lack of prospects for young people. The formally united European Community has to contend with a scarcity of actual cohesion. Internal contradictions hamper joint action, undermine the competitiveness of the economy and block free market mechanisms. Political instability around Europe hampers development planning and impedes initiative. The future of our Europe is a set of difficult questions. The European Economic Congress will attempt to answer them. 10.00-10.10 Opening of the Congress and reception of Guests: – Wojciech Kuśpik – Chairman of the Board, PTWP SA, Initiator of the European Economic Congress – Piotr Litwa – Voivode of Silesia – Wojciech Saługa – Marshal of the Silesian Voivodeship – Marcin Krupa – Mayor of Katowice – Jerzy Buzek – Member of the European Parliament, President of the European Parliament between 2009-2012, Prime Minister of the Republic of Poland between 1997-2001, Chairman of the Council of the EEC 10.10-10.30 Inaugural speeches: – Bronisław Komorowski – President of the Republic of Poland – Andrej Kiska – President of the Slovak Republic 10.30-12.00 300 billion for the new Europe. The large-scale investment programme of the European Union How to break stagnation in the economy? Demographic, political and economic risks The capital, regulations and leverage: the mechanics of the new financial vehicle More freedom and more responsibility: a comparison with previously used investment support mechanisms The role of the European Commission, financial market institutions and private investors The need for wise priorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Inflated Hopes Or a Promising Alternative? Evaluating Impact of LNG on Polish Energy Security
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Wharton Research Scholars Wharton Undergraduate Research 5-2019 Inflated Hopes or a Promising Alternative? Evaluating Impact of LNG on Polish Energy Security Przemyslaw Stefan Macholak University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/wharton_research_scholars Part of the Business Commons Macholak, Przemyslaw Stefan, "Inflated Hopes or a Promising Alternative? Evaluating Impact of LNG on Polish Energy Security" (2019). Wharton Research Scholars. 179. https://repository.upenn.edu/wharton_research_scholars/179 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/wharton_research_scholars/179 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Inflated Hopes or a Promising Alternative? Evaluating Impact of LNG on Polish Energy Security Keywords energy security, LNG Disciplines Business This thesis or dissertation is available at ScholarlyCommons: https://repository.upenn.edu/ wharton_research_scholars/179 INFLATED HOPES OR A PROMISING ALTERNATIVE? EVALUATING IMPACT OF LNG ON POLISH ENERGY SECURITY. By Przemyslaw Stefan Macholak An Undergraduate Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the WHARTON RESEARCH SCHOLARS Faculty Advisor: Anna Mikulska Ph.D. Senior Fellow at Kleinman Center for Energy Policy THE HUNTSMAN PROGRAM IN INTERNATIONAL STUDIES AND BUSINESS THE WHARTON SCHOOL, UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA MAY 2019 1. Introduction Over the last 10 years, global energy landscape has been significantly
    [Show full text]
  • Pgnig: Accumulate (Reiterated) PGN PW; PGN.WA | Gas & Oil, Polska
    Wednesday, July 27, 2016 | update PGNiG: accumulate (reiterated) PGN PW; PGN.WA | Gas & Oil, Polska High FCF Guarantees Sustained Dividends Current Price PLN 5.50 Target Price PLN 6.06 PGNiG has generated a total return of 13% since our last update in April, outperforming the WIG20 index by 19 points, and at the Market Cap PLN 32.45bn current level the first-quarter positive earnings surprise is fully Free Float PLN 9.47bn priced in. That said, we still see upside potential in the Company ADTV (3M) PLN 65.18m even despite a disappointing preliminary second-quarter report, and we maintain an accumulate rating for PGN with the price target Ownership raised to PLN 6.06 per share. We have upgraded our FY2017 outlook for the Power Generation business and the E&P business which will State Treasury 70.83% more than offset the slowdown in Trade and in Distribution. According to our calculations, PGNiG will end 2016 with a net debt Others 29.17% close to zero even after this year's acquisitions, and with the 2017- 2018 FCF projected at PLN 1.9bn this leaves a thick cash cushion to Business Profile sustain dividends. PGNiG is still at risk of becoming involved in PGNiG is Poland’s largest natural gas company with furthering the government's energy policy, but at this time there are annual sales exceeding 14 billion cubic meters. The no specific plans on the table (the potential acquisitions of EDF Company produces 4.5bcm of gas and 1.2mmt of Poland assets or Petrobaltic should not significantly hurt crude oil per year (including from international deposits, most notably the Skarv project in shareholder value, and the Norway pipeline plans are a remote Norway).
    [Show full text]
  • Permit for the Baltic Pipe Natural Gas Pipeline in the Lit- Tle Belt and Baltic Pipe (Europipe II Branch Pipeline) in the North Sea
    This translation is provided for convenience only, and in the event of any conflict be- tween the wording of the Danish and English versions, the wording of the Danish version shall prevail in all respects. UNOFFICIAL TRANSLATION Energinet Office GAS TSO Tonne Kjærsvej 65 7000 Fredericia Date Denmark Ref. no. xx Attn. Aaron Petersen DiBona / [initials] This is a translation from Danish. This translation is provided for convenience only, and in the event of any conflict between the wording of the Danish and English versions, the word- ing of the Danish version shall prevail in all respects. Permit for the Baltic Pipe natural gas pipeline in the Lit- tle Belt and Baltic Pipe (Europipe II Branch Pipeline) in the North Sea Energinet Gas TSO A/S (hereinafter ‘Energinet’) and Gaz-System S.A. plan to construct Baltic Pipe (Europipe II Branch Pipeline) in the North Sea and the Baltic Pipe pipeline in the Little Belt for the transport of natural gas from Europipe II in the North Sea to Poland via Denmark from Norway. Energinet will be the owner of the section of the pipeline proposed to be constructed in the North Sea and the Little Belt and most of the onshore section of the pipeline. Gaz-System will be the owner of 400 metres of onshore pipeline by Faxe Bugt and the pipeline in the Baltic Sea. The Danish Environmental Protection Agency is the responsible environmental authority for the on- shore section of the pipeline, while the Danish Energy Agency is the re- sponsible authority for the offshore section.
    [Show full text]