DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix C Selection of the Preferred Route Corridor

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix C Selection of the Preferred Route Corridor APPENDIX C SELECTION OF THE PREFERRED ROUTE CORRIDOR REPORT NOVEMBER 2011 NOVEMBER 2011 Yorkshire and Humber Carbon Capture, Transportation and Storage Project Selection of Preferred Corridor National Grid House National Grid Warwick Technology Park 1100 Century Way Gallows Hill Thorpe Park Warwick Leeds CV34 6DA LS15 8TU Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 6 1.1 Purpose of Report ............................................................................................ 6 2 BACKGROUND TO THE PROPOSAL ............................................................................. 7 2.1 Overview .......................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Need for the Project.......................................................................................... 7 2.3 Strategic Optioneering...................................................................................... 9 2.4 Route Corridor Study...................................................................................... 11 2.5 Stage 1 Consultation ...................................................................................... 12 3 FACTORS EMPLOYED IN EVALUATING CORRIDORS............................................... 13 3.1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 13 3.2 Planning Act 2008 .......................................................................................... 13 3.3 National Policy................................................................................................ 14 3.4 Conclusions.................................................................................................... 16 4 OTHER FACTORS CONSIDERED IN THE EVALUATION OF ROUTE CORRIDORS... 17 4.1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 17 4.2 Air Quality and Emission ................................................................................ 17 4.3 Dust, Odour Artificial Light, Smoke, Steam and Insect Infestation .................. 17 4.4 Noise and Vibration ........................................................................................ 17 4.5 Traffic and Transport Effects .......................................................................... 17 4.6 Waste Management ....................................................................................... 18 4.7 Land Ownership ............................................................................................. 18 4.8 Effect on Residential Amenity......................................................................... 18 5 ROUTE CORRIDORS..................................................................................................... 19 5.1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 19 5.2 Route Corridor Options................................................................................... 20 5.3 Feasible Combinations of Route Corridor Options and AGI Option Areas ...... 21 6 NATIONAL AND LOCAL POLICY CONTEXT................................................................ 22 6.1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 22 6.2 Context........................................................................................................... 22 6.3 Energy and Climate Change Policy ................................................................ 22 6.4 UK Policy and Initiatives ................................................................................. 22 6.5 National Policy Statements............................................................................. 23 6.6 Planning Policy Statements............................................................................ 25 6.7 Regional Plan................................................................................................. 28 6.8 Development Plans ........................................................................................ 29 6.9 Legal Protections for Habitats and Species .................................................... 30 6.10 Stage 1 Consultation Representations ........................................................... 31 iii 6.11 Comparison of Route Corridors ...................................................................... 32 6.12 Conclusions of results .................................................................................... 32 7 STAGE 1 CONSULTATION REPRESENTATIONS........................................................ 33 7.1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 33 7.2 Representations on Route Corridor Study ...................................................... 33 7.3 Parish Councils .............................................................................................. 34 7.4 Thorntree Drainage Board.............................................................................. 35 7.5 Other organisations ........................................................................................ 35 7.6 General Public................................................................................................ 36 7.7 Representations in Relation to Zone A ........................................................... 38 7.8 Representations in Relation to Zone B ........................................................... 39 7.9 Representations in Relation to Zone C ........................................................... 39 7.10 Representations In Relation To Zone D.......................................................... 40 7.11 Representations in Relation to Zone E ........................................................... 40 8 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIO ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS............................... 41 8.1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 41 8.2 Heritage.......................................................................................................... 42 8.3 Ecology / Biodiversity ..................................................................................... 46 8.4 Landscape...................................................................................................... 50 8.5 Socio Economic.............................................................................................. 53 8.6 Water Resources and Flood Risk ................................................................... 60 9 CONSTRUCTABILITY ISSUES...................................................................................... 69 9.1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 69 9.2 Stage I Consultation Representations ............................................................ 69 9.3 Comparison of Route Corridors ...................................................................... 70 Zone A – Corridors A1 to A4 and AGI Option Area A.................................................. 70 Zone B – Corridors B1 to B6 and Option Area B......................................................... 72 Zone C – Corridors C1 to C7 and AGI Option Areas C North and South .................... 73 Zone D – Corridors D1 to D6 and AGI Option Areas D North and South .................... 75 Zone E – Corridors E1 to E3....................................................................................... 77 10 COMPARISON OF ROUTE CORRIDORS ..................................................................... 78 11 CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................................................... 107 11.1 Route Corridors............................................................................................ 107 11.2 AGI Option Areas ......................................................................................... 108 11.3 Extension Areas ........................................................................................... 109 11.4 Summary...................................................................................................... 109 12 NEXT STEPS................................................................................................................ 111 Glossary.................................................................................................................................. 112 iv v Yorkshire and Humber Carbon Capture, Transportation and Storage Project Selection of Preferred Corridor 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose of Report 1.1.1 This report outlines the selection of a preferred corridor for a cross country pipeline to support the development of a carbon capture, transportation and storage (CCS) project in the Yorkshire and Humber region. The pipeline would transport carbon dioxide (CO2), captured from the proposed Don Valley Power Project at Stainforth, adjacent to the Hatfield Colliery near Doncaster, to a permanent storage site beneath the North Sea. This pipeline would be capable of forming a foundation of a regional CCS transportation and storage network which could also function to serve other CO2 emitters. 1.1.2 The report is structured as follows: • Chapter 2 – explains the background to the proposals, including the need for the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • U DDBA Papers of the Barnards Family 1401-1945 of South Cave
    Hull History Centre: Papers of the Barnards Family of South Cave U DDBA Papers of the Barnards Family 1401-1945 of South Cave Historical background: The papers relate to the branch of the family headed by Leuyns Boldero Barnard who began building up a landed estate centred on South Cave in the mid-eighteenth century. His inherited ancestry can be traced back to William and Elizabeth Barnard in the late sixteenth century. Their son, William Barnard, became mayor of Hull and died in 1614. Of his seven sons, two of them also served time as mayor of Hull, including the sixth son, Henry Barnard (d.1661), through whose direct descendants Leuyns Boldero Barnard was eventually destined to succeed. Henry Barnard, married Frances Spurrier and together had a son and a daughter. His daughter, Frances, married William Thompson MP of Humbleton and his son, Edward Barnard, who lived at North Dalton, was recorder of Hull and Beverley from the early 1660s until 1686 when he died. He and his wife Margaret, who was also from the Thompson family, had at least seven children, the eldest of whom, Edward Barnard (d.1714), had five children some of whom died without issue and some had only female heirs. The second son, William Barnard (d.1718) married Mary Perrot, the daughter of a York alderman, but had no children. The third son, Henry Barnard (will at U DDBA/14/3), married Eleanor Lowther, but he also died, in 1769 at the age of 94, without issue. From the death of Henry Barnard in 1769 the family inheritance moved laterally.
    [Show full text]
  • 39. Humberhead Levels Area Profile: Supporting Documents
    National Character 39. Humberhead Levels Area profile: Supporting documents www.naturalengland.org.uk 1 National Character 39. Humberhead Levels Area profile: Supporting documents Introduction National Character Areas map As part of Natural England’s responsibilities as set out in the Natural Environment White Paper,1 Biodiversity 20202 and the European Landscape Convention,3 we are revising profiles for England’s 159 National Character Areas North (NCAs). These are areas that share similar landscape characteristics, and which East follow natural lines in the landscape rather than administrative boundaries, making them a good decision-making framework for the natural environment. Yorkshire & The North Humber NCA profiles are guidance documents which can help communities to inform West their decision-making about the places that they live in and care for. The information they contain will support the planning of conservation initiatives at a East landscape scale, inform the delivery of Nature Improvement Areas and encourage Midlands broader partnership working through Local Nature Partnerships. The profiles will West also help to inform choices about how land is managed and can change. Midlands East of Each profile includes a description of the natural and cultural features England that shape our landscapes, how the landscape has changed over time, the current key drivers for ongoing change, and a broad analysis of each London area’s characteristics and ecosystem services. Statements of Environmental South East Opportunity (SEOs) are suggested, which draw on this integrated information. South West The SEOs offer guidance on the critical issues, which could help to achieve sustainable growth and a more secure environmental future.
    [Show full text]
  • Draftrail Strategy
    South Yorkshire Passenger Transport Authority DRAFT RAIL STRATEGY Consultation Draft – October 2008 South Yorkshire, Making Rail a Better Choice 1 South Yorkshire, Making Rail a Better Choice Contents Contents Page Executive Summary 4 1. Introduction 5 2. The Rail Strategy in Context 9 National Context 10 Regional Context 10 Context Diagram 10 Strategy Objectives 11 3. Current Conditions 13 South Yorkshire Network 13 Local Network 13 Express Long Distance 15 Open Access 17 Freight 18 Rolling Stock 21 Train Capacity 23 South Yorkshire Stations 24 Access to Stations 28 Network Performance 29 Network Constraints 32 Ticketing and Pricing 34 Recent Land Use and Demand Changes 35 4. Recent Research 37 5. Future Conditions 39 Future Demand 39 New Stations 40 New Lines 41 Delivery Priorities 43 6. Action Plan 43 Details of Delivery/Funding 43 7. Monitoring and Consultation 46 Details of current Monitoring 46 Reporting processes 46 Consultation 48 2 Appendix One – The Rail Strategy in Context Appendix Two – Network Diagram/Map Appendix Three – Current Station Standards and Facilities Appendix Four – Proposed Housing Growth related to Rail Stations Appendix Five – Network bottlenecks and scheme dependencies Appendix Six – Delivery Plan 3 Executive Summary Executive Summary South Yorkshire, Making Rail a Better Choice To be drafted once contents are endorsed 4 Chapter 1 Introduction South Yorkshire, Making Rail a Better Choice Summary This document brings together changes in contextual policy and investment plans and Identifies the role of the Rail Strategy Provides an update on work completed since 2004 Summarises key developments and the effect on rail users Links all the above to explain the need for change Provides the planned actions to take the Strategy forward in the short, medium and long term 1.1 This Rail Strategy is produced by South Yorkshire Passenger Transport Executive (SYPTE), on behalf of South Yorkshire Passenger Transport Authority (SYPTA) and represents an update of the previous strategy issued in 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • Double Nine Pocklington Canal Amenity Society
    DOUBLE NINE POCKLINGTON CANAL AMENITY SOCIETY Autumn 2011 No. 96 2 Editor’s Notes Well, another boating season is drawing to a close. Although not for everybody. (Remember Howard‟s article in our March Issue about winter cruising) New Horizons has had another record breaking year carrying around 2000 pas- sengers on more than 80 trips. Many thanks to all our volunteers who made this possible. For our „Spotlight On‟ subject ,this issue, we move away from featuring a PCAS Member and welcome the comments from Jon Horsfall, British Waterways North East Regional Manager. His views about the coming changes facing BW make very interesting reading. I am also delighted to have a contribution from Peter Hardy who compiled the very first Canal Guide for the Pocklington Canal. Many thanks to all our contributors without whom, we would not have a newsletter. Have you got something to say? A story about the Canal or indeed any waterway subject that may be of interest to our readers. Please contact me if you can help. I am happy also to publish letters (where appropriate) if you have any comments to make. It is always good to know what you think otherwise we are just working in the dark producing what we think you want to read. In the centre of this issue is a Membership Form. I apologise for repeating what is also said by others but PLEASE do fill this in even if you think you have nothing different to tell us. Many members are not aware that we do not have the correct information on file.
    [Show full text]
  • East Riding of Yorkshire Council Museums Service Collections Development Policy
    East Riding of Yorkshire Council Museums Service Collections Development Policy Lead Directorate and Museums Service, Department of Environment & Neighbourhood service: Services Effective Date: 30 October 2001 Date Last Reviewed: 25th September 2018 Date Due for Review: 25th September 2020 Contact Officer: David Marchant, Museums Registrar Contact Number: 01482 39 2771 Approved By: The Executive on 16 October 2001 1. Background 1.1 Formal adoption of a Collections Development Policy (previously referred to as the Acquisition & Disposal policy) is a requirement for any museum seeking to obtain/retain Accredited status under the Arts Council England (ACE) Accreditation scheme. The Council’s Museums Service achieved Accreditation in 2007, with two commendations for documentation & collections care and was again awarded full Accreditation on 23 May 2013 and 5th October 2017. 1.2 The East Riding of Yorkshire Council’s Museums Service (ERYMS) currently consists of the following sites: Sewerby Hall Museum & Art Gallery, Beverley Art Gallery & The Treasure House, Beverley Guildhall, Skidby Windmill and Goole Museum. This policy will apply equally to all of these sites and to any other museum or gallery sites that may subsequently come under the control of the Council. 1.3 Supporting detailed information required as part of ACE’s Accreditation scheme is included within this policy as separate appendices. They are as follows: Appendix A- An Overview of Current Collections and a History of the Development of these Collections. Appendix B- Themes and Priorities for future collecting. Appendix C –Collecting Policies of Neighbouring Museums. 1 2. Definitions for the Purposes of this Policy: 2.1 The Museum Association defines museums as follows: “Museums enable people to explore collections for inspiration, learning and enjoyment.
    [Show full text]
  • High Hunsley Circuit 25 MILE CIRCULAR WALK
    The High Hunsley Circuit 25 MILE CIRCULAR WALK The High Hunsley Circuit was devised in by the late Dennis Parker, former Chairman of the Beverley Group of the Ramblers’ Association. The route is easy to follow. From Walkington to Welton Wold Farm it incorporates a part of the route of the Beverley 20 walk (waymarked B20). The section from Brantingham to Hessleskew follows part of the Yorkshire Wolds Way, waymarked with its distinctive acorn symbol. The entire route is shown on the Kingston upon Hull and Beverley OS Explorer Map 293 at 1:25,000 scale. The route can be walked as a challenge route in a single day or can be divided into two or three linear sections. It can be started at any point and walked in either direction. Short detours can be made to a number of attractive nearby villages, most of which have a pub and/or tea-room. Several of them are served by hourly bus services. To obtain an A3 leaflet with a sketch map, and further information about the badge, details of useful bus routes , car parking and places of interest close to the route, please send s.a.e. to David Court, 3 Fairview Close,Beverley,HU17 7DE, Beverley, East Yorkshire HU17 7DX, Tel: 01482 871703, email [email protected] Route description Section 1 Clockwise from Bishop Burton Pond to York Grounds From the bus stop opposite the village pond, cross over and take the minor road to the right hand side of the pond which bears round to the right passing School Green.
    [Show full text]
  • Driffield EASTFIELD
    A614 www.eastriding.gov.uk AD RO TMENT LANE ALLO Driffield EASTFIELD SCARBOR A614 SPELLO AD RO ON THE TOWARDS NAFFERTON WGAT OUGH RO AV - follow for rides 1, 4 and 5 Cycle Map TH ST BRIDLINGT GIBSON ST E NOR NUE PARK CLOSE E WEST GA AD AD YORK RO MANORFIELD EA TE S MIDDLE ST N T GA EAST VICT AD TE RO B1249 RIDING AVE ORIA N NEW WEST GA LEISURE AD ST RO EAST GA DRIFFIELD AD Five cycle routes in and NEWLAND TE TE WANSFORDMANORFIELD RO RO around Driffield Ride 3 – CHALLENGING EXCHANGE S MILL ST T Some long climbs, which are worth it for the AVE AD DUNN’S LN beautiful views from the top of the Wolds. KINGS MILL RO QUEEN S AD AD RO CUSTOMER OW An excellent day ride for confident family groups. KING ST SESERRVVICESI CENTRE MEAD 32 miles / 52km, or 4 hours riding time. /LIB/LIBRARY/WC ALBION ST KEY MIDDLE ST S BRA BRA Leave Driffield along NCN route 1 travelling south along BRA Skerne Road. After approximately 3.5 miles, turn right at SECURE CYCLE PARKING B1 CKEN E CK CKEN LOCKWOOD ST 2 49 the crossroads towards Hutton. When you reach the village ST JOHN’S RO Welcome to Driffield! CYCLE SHON P RIVER HEAD continue past the phone box and turn right towards Southburn. R RO O RI Pass over the junction with the A164 and at the T junction ADA Driffield is a charming market town situated to the east of the Yorkshire Wolds approximately FREE LONG STAY CAR PARKING VERSID TOWARDS SKERNE 12 miles inland from the North Sea coast.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Aggregate Assessment 2017
    Doncaster and Rotherham Local Aggregate Assessment 2017 Incorporating 2016 Aggregates Monitoring Data (Endorsed by the Yorkshire and Humber Aggregates Working Party October 2017) Prepared by: Local Plans Team: Directorate of Regeneration and Environment: Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council, Floor 4, Civic Office, Waterdale, Doncaster, DN1 3BU Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 3 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 4 2016 Monitoring Information .............................................................................................. 5 Mineral Sites...................................................................................................................... 5 2016 Annual Monitoring Report for Doncaster and Rotherham Mineral Planning Authorities .......................................................................................................................................... 5 Sand and Gravel .................................................................................................................. 6 Table 1 Sand and Gravel Aggregate and Non-Aggregate sales 2006 to 2015 (Mt) ............ 6 Reserves of Sand and Gravel for Aggregate Use .............................................................. 6 Table 2 Reserves of Sand and Gravel for Aggregate Use ................................................. 6 New Permissions
    [Show full text]
  • London North Eastern Region Commentary 04
    Timetable Planning Rules London North Eastern 2020 TIMETABLE Version 2.0 Issued by Amy Forte Timetable Production Manager The Quadrant MK Elder Gate Milton Keynes MK9 1EN Tel: 07801 334042 Final Proposal for Principal Change Timetable 2020 8th February 2019 NETWORK RAIL Timetable Planning Rules Version: 2.0 London North Eastern Final Proposal for Principal Change Date: 8 February 2019 Timetable 2020 Page: 2 of 322 Contents Section Page no. Section Page no. 5.1 Sectional Running Times .........................................74 1 Introduction and General Notes .................... 3 5.1.1 Source of Current SRTs ...................................74 1.1 Index of Routes ............................................................. 4 5.1.2 Method of Calculation .......................................74 1.2 Sectional Appendices and Rule Book .................. 7 5.1.3 New and Revised Sectional Running Times75 1.2.1 Sectional Appendix .............................................. 7 5.1.4 Timing of Trains Consisting of Passenger 1.2.2 Rule Book ................................................................ 7 Vehicles on Goods Lines ............................................75 1.3 Definitions ....................................................................... 9 5.2 Headways ......................................................................75 1.3.1 Train Classification .............................................. 9 5.2.1 Headway Values .................................................75 1.3.2 Days of Operation ..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Laurence Edwards Messums London 75
    74 THE DONCASTER HEADS 75 In late 2017 Doncaster Council commissioned Laurence Edwards to create a sculpture to celebrate its mining history. Little did he know he was about to embark on a transformative journey. This publication celebrates and marks the first phase of the project. The finished sculpture is due to be unveiled in May 2020. LAURENCE EDWARDS MESSUMS LONDON LAURENCE EDWARDS MESSUMS LONDON MESSUMS WILTSHIRE 28 Cork Street Place Farm, Court Street Mayfair, London Tisbury, Salisbury W1S 3NG Wiltshire SP3 6LW THE DONCASTER HEADS 020 7437 5545 01747 445042 www.messumslondon.com www.messumswiltshire.com Laurence Edwards 76 77 PORTRAITS OF A MINING COMMUNITY Public commission preview 15 January - 15 February Messums London, 28 Cork Street, London W1S 3NG Pete O’Conner, Pit Bottom Coupling, Ripper Brodsworth Colliery (Wax original) 2 3 Robert Macfarlane - A New Stone-Book I grew up in coal-mining country. Collieries were the highest structures around: the headstocks with their spinning wheels, the For several months Laurence toured the pubs, clubs and community halls of the Doncaster region, speaking to miners and non-stop chunters of the winding engines. Power station cooling-towers made their own weather. Nodding donkeys pumped mining families in the city and its villages. Then he began a remarkable process, positioned somewhere between oral history drifts dry. Slagheaps leaked black streams, tracked with tyre-marks. I had a strong sense as a child of knowing only one storey and performance art. He would meet up to three mine-workers a day, and with each person would sit for two hours, modelling of the landscape, walking the surface above an invisible underworld of tunnels and shafts that ran for thousands of miles.
    [Show full text]
  • River Hull Integrated Catchment Strategy Strategy Document
    River Hull Advisory Board River Hull Integrated Catchment Strategy April 2015 Strategy Document Draft report This Page is intentionally left blank 2 Inner Leaf TITLE PAGE 3 This page is intentionally left blank 4 Contents 1 This Document.............................................................................................................................17 2 Executive Summary ..............................................................................................................18 3 Introduction and background to the strategy ..................................20 3.1 Project Summary .................................................................................................................................... 20 3.2 Strategy Vision ........................................................................................................................................ 20 3.2.1 Links to other policies and strategies .......................................................................................21 3.3 Background .............................................................................................................................................. 22 3.3.1 Location ........................................................................................................................................... 22 3.3.2 Key characteristics and issues of the River Hull catchment ...............................................22 3.3.3 EA Draft River Hull Flood Risk Management Strategy .........................................................26
    [Show full text]
  • Hull Thursday Rc
    Scene January-February 2019 Hull Thursday rc Winter Cycling is such a drag! Deanies escape to Costa del Sol See page 14 for holiday info Email articles for Scene to [email protected] For club information visit: www.htrc.co.uk Page 1 of 32 Club Scene January-February 2019 Hull Thursday rc Letter from the editor This month we have Front Page: Photos Deans Escape to the Sun Club Scene: Coming events. Minutes from the meeting and AGM minutes (please read), Geriatric Jaunt dates, Kit Super Sales, Farewell to Eric Suffill Social Scene: Deanies Escape to the Sun, Gerries rides. Racing Scene: The Three Dale Challenge, Jim’s Winter Training TT Scene: HTRC TT dates Muddy Scene: KORC 3 Hour Endurance Race, A Yorkshire Moors Weekend, Muddy Events Back Page: Blasts from the Past Thank you to Dave Millson, Neil Dean, John Ulyatt, Mike McAllister, Richard Guymer, Paul Kilvington, Eddie Kelsall, Geoff Rawson and me for contributing to this month’s newsletter. Plus Jim Sampson, Paul Hickerbottom, Ron Kirk and Rob Almond for Farewell to Eric Suffill Please can you send contributions for March as soon as possible March 21st deadline. Amanda Dean, Scene Editor, [email protected] Dates for your 2019 Diary Sunday Club Rides Skidby Mill 9:30am Organiser Neil Dean and other lead volunteers Ennerdale Cycle Track: Monday February 25th, 7pm Free 1 hour session for Hull Thursday Organiser Dave Millson George Ely 2Up TT Saturday March 16th Organiser Mike Kilgour – more below Cottingham Cycle Jumble, 17th March 10am to 2pm. Derby & Joan Club, Finkle Street.
    [Show full text]