Funding Plant Biology in Hard Times 5 Days by RICHARD DIXON in Austin University of North Texas, Denton Enjoy The

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Funding Plant Biology in Hard Times 5 Days by RICHARD DIXON in Austin University of North Texas, Denton Enjoy The May/June 2016 • Volume 43, Number 3 p. 7 p. 14 p. 25 ASPB Announces ASPB; Making a 2016 Summer 2016 Awards Difference in 2015 Undergraduate Research Fellows THE NEWSLETTER OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF PLANT BIOLOGISTS President’s Letter Funding Plant Biology in Hard Times 5 Days BY RICHARD DIXON in Austin University of North Texas, Denton Enjoy the ’m not sure that I know When I moved to the United Outdoors any research scientist who States in 1988 and started to Iwouldn’t claim that fund- participate on federal grant ing is tight these days. With panels, I was impressed by It’s All About historically low success rates their relatively broad remit, the Food at federal agencies, industry as the system from which I consolidating and pulling had just moved had recently back from supporting science become more difficult to Music Lover’s in the public sector, and state maneuver—only Arabidopsis funding for public universities one year, something else the Paradise no longer what it used to be, next. Although discipline times are hard. Several of the specific, the programs at federal programs that have Rick Dixon USDA and NSF did not spec- Annual been staples for funding plant ify more circumscribed areas biology in the past now have success rates but in large part allocated funding based on Party of less than 10%; this seems a far cry from the best science. Furthermore, most of the the days when I was on panels that funded grants in those days were single investigator around 35% of proposals, some as merit- grants, and if you made good progress, you President’s based awards in which a proposal from a could hopefully count on continued fund- Symposium lab that had shown a strong track record in ing that would see you through your tenure the past would, rightly or wrongly, undergo evaluation and beyond. a fairly cursory review for renewal. Now it A politically more sophisticated scientific is both hard to get into the game and just as community now lobbies for research initia- hard to maintain a large and productive lab. tives that translate into topic-specific calls Not only the level but also the focus of for funding. An unintended effect of this coverage starts on page 3 funding has undergone significant change. continued on page 6 Contents ASPB Council President Richard Dixon Immediate Past President, Chair Julian Schroeder President-elect Sally Mackenzie 1 President’s Letter Secretary Alice Harmon Treasurer; Chair, Board of Trustees C. Robertson McClung Plant Biology 2016 Elected Members Lisa Ainsworth Joe Kieber 3 5 Days in Austin Maureen McCann Chair, Membership Committee Jill Deikman 4 President’s Symposium Q&A with Rick Dixon Chair, Minority Affairs Committee Adán Colón-Carmona 5 Major Symposium-Developing Healthier Foods: Chair, Publications Committee Neil E. Olszewski Quality, Nutrition, and Molecular Gastronomy Chair, Women in Plant Biology Committee Marisa Otegui Chair, Education Committee Sarah Wyatt Chair, International Committee Tuan-Hua David Ho Chair, Science Policy Committee Patrick Schnable 7 ASPB Announces 2016 Awards Sectional Representatives 11 ASPB Members Elected to NAS Northeastern Section Peter Melcher Western Section Camille M. Steber 12 ASPB’s 2016 Women’s Young Investigator Travel Award Mid-Atlantic Section Hemayet Ullah Winners Announced Midwestern Section Ed Cahoon Southern Section Becca Dickstein 13 5th Pan-American Congress on Plants and BioEnergy Council members highlighted in blue also serve on the Board of Directors. 14 ASPB: Making a Difference in 2015 ASPB Staff Section News Chief executive officer Crispin Taylor, [email protected] Director of finance and administration Kim Kimnach, [email protected] 16 Midwestern Section Annual Meeting Report Executive and governance affairs administrator Sylvia Lee, [email protected] Accounts receivable and payable specialist Stephanie Liu-Kuan, [email protected] Where Are They Now? Senior staff accountant Jotee Pundu, [email protected] Director of meetings and events Jean Rosenberg, [email protected] 17 John S. Boyer Conference coordinator Stacy Loewentritt, [email protected] Director, digital strategy and member services Susan Cato, [email protected] Digital project manager Chris Mayfield, [email protected] Science Policy Manager, member services Shoshana Kronfeld, [email protected] Meetings, marketing, and membership assistant Melanie Binder, [email protected] 19 Policy Update Legislative and public affairs director Tyrone Spady, [email protected] Executive coordinator, Plant Science Natalie Henkhaus, [email protected] 21 Reach Out to Your Senators and Representatives During Research Network the August Congressional Recess Education coordinator Katie Engen, [email protected] Director of publications Nancy A. Winchester, [email protected] 21 Science Policy Committee Meets in Washington, DC Publications assistant Diane McCauley, [email protected] Subscriptions manager Suzanne Cholwek, [email protected] Education Forum Subscriptions assistant Linda Palmer, [email protected] Managing editor Patti Lockhart, [email protected] 23 White House Easter Egg Roll 2016: Science writer, Plant Physiology Peter Minorsky, [email protected] #Let’s Celebrate … Plants! Production manager, Plant Physiology Jon Munn, [email protected] Manuscript manager, Plant Physiology Ashton Wolf, [email protected] 25 Announcing the 2016 Summer Undergraduate Senior features editor, The Plant Cell Nan Eckardt, [email protected] Research Fellows (SURF) Features editor, The Plant Cell Mary Williams, [email protected] Production manager, The Plant Cell Susan Entwistle, [email protected] New Staff Manuscript manager, The Plant Cell Annette Kessler, [email protected] The ASPB News is distributed to all ASPB members and is also available online. It is pub- lished six times annually in odd-numbered months. Its purposes are to keep membership 28 Chris Mayfield informed of ASPB activities and to reinforce the value of membership. The ASPB News is edited and produced by ASPB staff from material provided by members and other interested parties. Obituary Copy deadline is the 5th day of the preceding even-numbered month (for example, April 5 for May/June publication). 29 Chu-Yung Lin Contact: Nancy A. Winchester, Editor, ASPB News, 15501 Monona Drive, Rockville, MD 20855-2768 USA; [email protected]; 301-296-0904. © 2016 American Society of Plant Biologists 2 ASPB NEWS | MAY/JUNE 2016 5 Days in Austin Day Day If you are coming to Austin for 3 5 Plant Biology 2016, by now you have likely made your Day Music Lover’s Paradise President’s Symposium airline and hotel reservations. Austin’s music scene continues Make the most of the last day 1 to evolve, and great places to of the meeting by attending So What’s Next? listen are within walking dis- the President's Symposium, A good first step is to make a Enjoy the Outdoors tance of the Convention Cen- organized by ASPB President plan for the sessions, posters, Register early. Registration is ter and your hotel. Check out Rick Dixon, “Plant Specialized and exhibitors you want to open Friday, July 8, from 2:00 the music venues in nearby Metabolism Overview.” One of see (https://www.eventscribe. p.m. until 6:00 p.m. and begin- Austin neighborhoods (http:// four major priorities in ASPB’s com/2016/ASPB/). If you’re not ning at 8:00 a.m. on Saturday, www.austintexas.org/visit/ Decadal Vision is to develop an ready to make a plan, explore July 9. entertainment-districts/). understanding of the synthesis your options: for example, join and biological purposes of If you’re not attending an early the discussion about the meet- plant-derived chemicals. Plant session, take a walking tour ing on Plantae.org, check out specialized metabolism has, around downtown Austin the interview with Harry Klee for many years, been treated (http://bit.ly/1l2ba4T). Then, about his symposium on de- Day as a specialized subject not if you have time one evening, veloping healthier foods (see of general interest to plant walk over to the Congress 4 page 5), or start letting others scientists, of broad relevance Avenue Bridge and see the know your plans to attend and to plant biology, or attractive bridge bats, a famous Austin Annual Party your interests at #plantbio16. to funding agencies. This situa- tourist attraction (http://bit. Beginning June 30, you can As the meeting nears its end, tion is now changing. The 2016 ly/1SyF2Rq). download the conference app you’ll have met new colleagues, President’s Symposium will to connect with colleagues planned some collaborations, highlight aspects of plant spe- and friends. attended great science sessions, cialized metabolism that relate and shared your ideas at the to broader aspects of biology, You’ll have free time before and ASPB Town Hall. Now it’s time namely genome organization, after the sessions, and Austin is a Day to celebrate! The Austin Nines evolution, ecology, and exploi- perfect place for foodies, history 2 band returns for this year’s tation for bio-based products. buffs, music lovers, and outdoor annual party. (If you were in fans. So here is a suggested Portland or Minneapolis, you Also, make plans to attend the itinerary, but you can check out It’s All About the Food know how great they are.) The Post-transcriptional Gene Regu- http://365thingsaustin.com/ and By now, the meeting is in full venue for the 2016 annual party lation in Plants meeting on July create your own plans. In addi- swing, but you have to eat, is Speakeasy, just a few blocks 14–15 at the Austin Conven- tion, watch for regular updates so try some of the great food from the Convention Center, tion Center. You can attend on new and interesting things to the city has to offer. There with a music lounge, bowling two great meetings with one do in Austin at #plantbio16 and are many different cuisines alley, and pool table spread over trip! Registration and abstract on the conference app.
Recommended publications
  • 2020 Stanford Bio-X Fellowship Brochure
    STANFORD BIO-X PHD FELLOWSHIPS 2020 Stanford Bio-X Fellows Group Photo 2019 The Stanford Bio-X Graduate Fellowships The mission of the Stanford Bio-X Program is to catalyze discovery by crossing the boundaries between disciplines to bring interdisciplinary solutions, to create new knowl- edge of biological systems, and to benefit human health. Since it was established in 1998, Stanford Bio-X has charted a new approach to life science research by bringing together clinical experts, life scientists, engineers, and others to tackle the complexity of the human body. Currently over 980 Stanford Faculty and over 8,000 students, postdocs, researchers, etc. are affiliated with Stanford Bio-X. The generous support from donors, including the Bowes Foundation, enables the program to remain successful—at any given time, Stanford Bio-X is training at least 60 Ph.D fellows, and Fall 2020 brings 21 new fellows to the program. The Stanford Bio-X Graduate Fellowship Program was started to answer the need for training a new breed of visionary science leaders capable of crossing the bound- aries between disciplines in order to bring novel research endeavors to fruition. Since its inception in 2004, the three-year fellowships, including the Stanford Bio-X Bowes Fellowships and the Bio-X Stanford Interdisciplinary Graduate Fellowships (Bio-X SIGFs), have provided 318 graduate students with awards to pursue interdisciplinary research and to collaborate with multiple mentors, enhancing their potential to gen- erate profound transformative discoveries. Stanford Bio-X Fellows become part of a larger Stanford Bio-X community of learning that encourages their further networking and development.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Omic Approaches for Biosynthetic Pathway Prediction in Plants
    Propositions 1. Although guilt-by-association (the principle behind many gene function prediction approaches) promotes “throwing data against the wall to see what sticks”, there is value in interpreting what did not “stick”. (this thesis) 2. To aid data interoperability and re-use, the design of new -omics experiments should always consider the design of previous ones with similar objectives or parameters. (this thesis) 3. Skilled computational scientists make themselves irrelevant for routine tasks, and indispensable for novel ones. 4. Within Academia excess attention is given to the name and prestige of journals, laboratories and authors. 5. The basics of “programming” and “computer science” will soon be seen as analogous to “literacy” and “numeracy”. 6. Children should be taught about life that most adults, if not all, are making it up as they live. Propositions belonging to the thesis, entitled Multi-omics Approaches for Biosynthetic Pathway Prediction in Plants Hernando Suarez Wageningen, 8 February 2021 Multi-omics approaches for biosynthetic pathway prediction in plants Hernando Suarez 2 Thesis committee Promotors Prof. Dr. Ir. D. de Ridder Professor of Bioinformatics Wageningen University & Research Co-promotor Dr. M.H. Medema Assistant Professor of Bioinformatics Wageningen University & Research Other members Prof. Dr. C.S. Testerink, Wageningen University & Research Dr. M.F. Seidl, Utrecht University Dr. S.E. O’Connor, Max Planck Institute of Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany Dr. R. Cavill, Maastricht University This research was conducted under the auspices of the Graduate School Experimental Plant Sciences 3 Multi-omics approaches for biosynthetic pathway prediction in plants Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of doctor at Wageningen University by the authority of the Rector Magnificus, Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 JGI Secondary Metabolite Abstract Book
    Microbial and Plant Systems Modulated by Secondary Metabolites Meeting May 2–4, 2016 Walnut Creek, California Meeting Abstracts All information current as of April 29, 2016 JGI Contact: Denise Yadon DOE Joint Genome Institute [email protected] The Joint Genome Institute is a user facility of the Department of Energy Office of Science DOE Joint Genome Institute: www.jgi.doe.gov DOE Office of Science: science.energy.gov Agenda Agenda Monday, May 2 (Walnut Creek Marriott) 5:00 – 5:10 PM Opening Remarks Host: Susannah Tringe, JGI 5:10 – 6:00 PM Opening Key Note: Niche adaptation of Julia Vorholt, ETH Zurich the Arabidopsis leaf microbiota 6:00 – 9:00 PM Poster Session and Reception *Refreshments served Tuesday, May 3 (JGI Room 149A) 9:00 – 10:10 AM Overview of the JGI Capabilities Chair: Yasuo Yoshikuni, JGI * Will include morning break & working lunch 9:00 – 9:10 AM Welcome and Introduction Susannah Tringe, JGI *Morning refreshments served 9:10 – 9:25 AM JGI Synthesis Science Yasuo Yoshikuni, JGI 9:25 – 9:40 AM JGI Synthesis Platform Sam Deutsch, JGI 9:40 – 9:55 AM IMG-ABC: A Resource for Biosynthetic Michalis Hadjithomas, JGI Gene Cluster Discovery and Analysis 9:55 – 10:10 AM JGI Metabolomics Trent Northen, JGI 10:10 – 10:30 AM Break 10:30 – 12:05 PM SESSION I: Science from the JGI User Communities 10:30 – 10:35 AM Introduction Yasuo Yoshikuni, JGI 10:35 – 11:05 AM Investigating Plant Terpene Metabolic Philipp Zerbe, Diversity for Pharmaceutical and University of California, Davis Agricultural Applications 11:05 – 11:35 AM Volatile Metabolites
    [Show full text]
  • Net Loss to Adjusted EBITDA: Non-GAAP Reconciliations Three Months Ended December 31 Year Ended December 31 $ in Thousands 2020 2019 2020 2019
    Nature Inspired. Technology Driven.™ FOURTH QUARTER 2020 FINANCIAL RESULTS CONFERENCE CALL, MARCH 4, 2021 © CALYXT, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Forward Looking Statements We have made these forward-looking statements in reliance on the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In some cases, you can identify these statements by forward-looking words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “continue,” “estimates,” “expects,” “targets,” “intends,” “may,” “might,” “plans,” “potential,” “predicts,” “projects,” “should,” “will,” or the negative of these terms and other similar terminology. Forward-looking statements in this report include statements about the potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business and operating results; our future financial performance; product pipeline and development; our business model and strategies for commercialization and sales of commercial products; regulatory progression; potential collaborations, partnerships and licensing arrangements and their contribution to our financial results, cash usage, and growth strategies; and anticipated trends in our business. These and other forward-looking statements are predictions and projections about future events and trends based on our current expectations, objectives and intentions and premised on current assumptions. Our actual results, level of activity, performance, or achievements could be materially different than those expressed, implied, or anticipated by forward-looking statements due to a variety of factors, including,
    [Show full text]
  • Division of Organic Chemistry
    ORGN DIVISION OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY S. Silverman and E. McLaughlin, Program Chairs SUNDAY MORNING Section A Pennsylvania Convention Center 116 New Reactions & Methodology S. M. Silverman, Organizer 8:00 1. Copper catalyzed reductive carbonylation of alkyl iodides. S. Zhao, N.P. Mankad 8:20 2. Sulfenate-anion-catalyzed diastereoselective aziridination of imines. Z. Zheng, P.J. Walsh 8:40 3. Cyanoalkylcopper species in carbon-carbon bond forming reactions. D.L. Silverio 9:00 4. New reactivity enabled by cation-π interactions. P.J. Walsh 9:20 5. Dipolar alkynyl-prins (DAP) cyclization for the rapid construction of complex polycycles. S. Abdul-Rashed, G. Alachouzos, A. Frontier 9:40 6. Subphthalocyanines and perylene-diimide derivatives in organic photovoltaics. L. Chockalingam Kasi Viswanath 10:00 7. Silylated α-aminonitriles for late-stage functionalization. T. Mathew, T. Yamato, S.G. Prakash 10:20 8. Synthesis of differentially substituted diynes via tandem nucleophilic addition/fragmentation pathways. A. Tavakoli, G.B. Dudley 10:40 9. Analogues of Bestmann’s ylide, Ph3P=C=C=O: Syntheses, structures and Lewis acid catalyzed cyclizations with organic substrates. C. Krempner 11:00 10. Diastereoselective alkynylations of β-(Bromo)iminium ions via copper(I) catalysis. S.O. Santana, W. Guan, M.P. Watson 11:20 11. Modular three-component difunctionalization of aryl/cyclohexenyl triflates via arynes and cyclohexynes. S. Cho, Q. Wang 11:40 12. 1,2-aminocyanation of alkenes via distal migration. Y. Kwon, Q. Wang Section B Pennsylvania Convention Center 117 Heterocycles & Aromatics S. M. Silverman, Organizer 8:00 13. Formal [4+2] cycloaddition between alkynes and allene-ynes to generate functionalized toluenes.
    [Show full text]
  • Stanford University E N G I N E E R I N G Chemical Engineering Stanford, CA 94305-5025
    CHAITAN KHOSLA School of Engineering STANFORD Wells H. Hauser and Harold M. Petiprin Professor Keck, Room 337 CHEMI CAL Chair, Department of Stanford University E n g i n e e r i n G Chemical Engineering Stanford, CA 94305-5025 Fall 2010 Dear Chemical Engineering Alumni and Friends, As the new academic year begins, I’d like to tell you about some of the significant events in the Stanford Department of Chemical Engineering over the past year. Our 50th Birthday Party On May 11, at this year’s Mason Lectures, we celebrated the 50th anniversary of the founding of the Stanford Department of Chemical Engineering. And what a celebration it was! Special thanks to Gerry Fuller, Pam Juanes, and a core group of alumni including John Richardson, Eric Lutkin, Carol Fisher, and Lisa Hwang for making the event a huge success. What started as a dream in the brain of the late Professor David Mason half a century ago has now evolved into a department with 15 active faculty, approximately 75 undergraduate majors, more than 100 graduate students, and more than 20 postdoctoral researchers. Last year alone, students and faculty in the department collectively published more than 100 peer-reviewed papers in the primary literature. More than a dozen U.S. patents were awarded to researchers in the department. And somehow, if you ask any student or faculty member, they’ll shrug their shoulders and say that we’re only just getting started. Much has changed in the past 50 years, but some things remain the same. Foremost among the constants are our shared passion for teaching and learning and our unshakeable confidence that as long as Stanford chemical engineers remain well schooled in the foundational sciences of physics, chemistry, and biology, and as long as they are adequately introduced to the awesome conceptual and practical power of the preparative, analytical, and modeling tools that we call chemical engineering, good things will continue to happen.
    [Show full text]