DOCSLIB.ORG

Rum Jungle Rehabilitation Trial Monitoring 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rum Jungle Rehabilitation Trial Monitoring 2016 Insert Client logo if appropriate. Insert logo into text box. Flora Monitoring on the Revegetation Trial to Inform Rehabilitation Design for the Former Rum Jungle Mine Site Prepared for: Department of Mines and Energy Prepared by: EcOz Environmental Consultants 2 016 1. www.ecoz.com.au This page has been intentionally left blank Client: Department of Mines and Energy ii Doc Title: Rum Jungle Rehabilitation Trial – Monitoring 2016 Document Control Record Document Code: EZ15131-C0301-EST-R-0001 Catalogue Number: 63397 Project Manager: Chris Brady Author(s): Chris Brady and Nicole Clark Approved by: Jeff Richardson Approval date: 25 May 2016 DOCUMENT HISTORY Version Issue Date Brief Description Reviewer/Approver 1.A - B 29 Mar 2016 Report preparation by authors Authors 1.C 30 Mar 2016 Internal review Jeff Richardson 1.D 31 Mar 2016 Draft sent to client Jeff Richardson 2.A 24 May 2016 Response to DME comments Jeff Richardson 3.A 25 May 2016 Final version sent to client Jeff Richardson Recipients are responsible for eliminating all superseded documents in their possession. EcOz Pty Ltd. ABN: 81 143 989 039 Telephone: +61 8 8981 1100 Winlow House, 3rd Floor Facsimile: +61 8 8981 1102 75 Woods Street Email: [email protected] DARWIN NT 0800 Internet: www.ecoz.com.au GPO Box 381, Darwin NT 0800 Cover page: Photograph of an area of with vigorous Acacia and Eucalypt growth near sample plot RV11. RELIANCE, USES and LIMITATIONS This report is copyright and is to be used only for its intended purpose by the intended recipient, and is not to be copied or used in any other way. The report may be relied upon for its intended purpose within the limits of the following disclaimer. This study, report and analyses have been based on the information available to EcOz Environmental Consultants at the time of preparation. EcOz Environmental Consultants accepts responsibility for the report and its conclusions to the extent that the information was sufficient and accurate at the time of preparation. EcOz Environmental Consultants does not take responsibility for errors and omissions due to incorrect information or information not available to EcOz Environmental Consultants at the time of preparation of the study, report or analyses. Client: Department of Mines and Energy iii Doc Title: Rum Jungle Rehabilitation Trial – Monitoring 2016 This page has been intentionally left blank Client: Department of Mines and Energy iv Doc Title: Rum Jungle Rehabilitation Trial – Monitoring 2016 Executive Summary This report summarises the findings of monitoring of the Borrow Area 5 rehabilitation trial at the Rum Jungle former mine site. It is noted that reconstructed landscape proposed for Rum Jungle will have a variety of landscapes and that the findings here will not be applicable to all areas. The aim of the revegetation trial is to grow a woodland of local native species. The method trialled was weed control and direct seeding. Also, in an attempt to limit Gamba Grass invasion an area was seeded with Silk Sorghum. This monitoring event occurred 14 months after the area was seeded. The rehabilitation is therefore at an early stage of growth somewhat limiting conclusions that can be drawn at this early stage. A diversity of tree and shrubs species seedlings are present and there was a dense ground cover, dominated by native grasses in most areas. The density of stems is within the range of a Top-End woodland. Acacias were the most common woody plant species with Acacia oncinocarpa the most common. Eucalypts were present, with Eucalyptus miniata the most common. Although only recently seeded these results indicate that the area could be on a trajectory towards a woodland community dominated by local species. Two other possible trajectories are proposed: a vegetation community dominated by Gamba Grass or a vegetation community dominated by Acacia. Monitoring on an annual or every second year basis until short lived Acacias die out will provide valuable information on likely trajectory for later rehabilitation work. There was considerable variation in Gamba Grass cover between sites. Of the two Silk Sorghum sites one site had the second highest Gamba Grass cover, the other the second lowest. Thus conclusions on the effectiveness of the Silk Sorghum trial cannot be made except to note that other variables may be affecting results and further replication is required to test this. From these results Silk Sorghum did not eliminate Gamba Grass (although it may hinder its growth). Management of Gamba Grass will be an important component of rehabilitation efforts at Rum Jungle as without management of Gamba Grass and fire the area may be a Gamba Grass dominated grassland. Recommendations from this trial include: • Add more Eucalypt seeds to the seed mix for further seeding particularly Eucalyptus tetrodonta, and Ironwood. This should include Corymbia polysciada and Corymbia grandifolia as they have self-seeded and are growing in the surrounding area. • Carry out seed viability trials before any future seeding and use the results to adjust the seed mix. • Consider tailoring the seed mix to site specific conditions (e.g. adding additional Melaleuca seed to areas likely to be seasonally inundated). • Investigate and if possible correct the low seed viability of many of the species in the seed mix. In the event it cannot be improved: o Consider the use of top soil and/or inoculation with mycorrhizal fungi to increase the density and diversity of Eucalypts in rehabilitation areas. o Consider the use of tubestock to increase density and diversity. • Investigate and address the low number of some important mid storey species such as Buchanania obovata and Terminalia ferdinandiana and include some of the self-seeded mid storey species into the seed mix. • Continue Gamba Grass and Mission Grass control on a regular basis as these grassy weeds have the potential to promote hot fires that will kill desirable canopy species. • Investigate the mechanism of Gamba Grass spread at the site to facilitate management. • Investigate the range of options for managing Gamba Grass, this may include establishing a Gamba Grass buffer around the perimeter (e.g. a cleared or heavily grazed area). Monitoring of the revegetation should continue as it will provide valuable information to inform the rehabilitation methods. Important questions include the effects of competition between woody species and grasses, will Acacia dominance persist and will the lack of Eucalypt diversity effect the resilience of the Client: Department of Mines and Energy v Doc Title: Rum Jungle Rehabilitation Trial – Monitoring 2016 community? To facilitate this monitoring all woody plants in the 11 vegetation plots have been tagged and information collected about their immediate surrounds. Adding plots in areas with vigorous growth and relatively bare areas may provide useful information for factors influencing wood plant growth. To determine specific completion criteria requires a stratification of the proposed reconstructed landform and consideration of factors that will limit revegetation in these areas. Using this information realistic goals should be set based on surrounding vegetation communities and knowledge from other mine sites. More targeted studies of surrounding communities and other rehabilitation areas may be required to inform revegetation of these specific communities. Goals should be set in conjunction with consultation with Traditional Owners. Completion criteria should remain, at this stage, broad and generic as specific completion criteria may set unrealistic expectations and erroneously be used to develop rehabilitation procedures (such as seed mix) and will limit what is considered successful rehabilitation. This conclusion is reinforced by the variability between sites: it may be that a single completion criteria may be incorrect and different edaphic (and other) profiles may be found to lead to other vegetation communities reflecting the diversity of environments and complex conditions likely at the site. A summary of the response to the project scope is given in the cross reference table below. Client: Department of Mines and Energy vi Doc Title: Rum Jungle Rehabilitation Trial – Monitoring 2016 Task from scope Key points Section Indicators of revegetation/ecosystem success A high level summary of the role of indicators is provided. 6.1 The rehabilitation strategy aims to be consistent with the views and interests of Traditional Owners. The setting of indicators of revegetation success must therefore reflect their aspirations and expectations. A stated objective of Traditional Owners is restoring flora and fauna species endemic to the site and its immediate surrounds (NTG 2013). This is very broad, further discussion may yield key culturally significant species. There will be a diversity of environments created during rehabilitation and the vegetation communities they can support will be variable. Indicators will be specific for each environment. Before any specific indicators are chosen the range of environments needs to be identified along with the limitations for re-vegetation considered (soil properties, slopes, water movement etc.). The role of silk sorghum as a cover crop Silk Sorghum has not prevented the establishment of Gamba Grass, but may hinder its 5.4 growth. Woody plants species and densities in the Silk Sorghum trial area were within the range of other sites. Monitoring until Silk Sorghum dies out is required to determine if the Silk Sorghum cover crop influences growth rates and make-up of rehabilitation communities. Further replication may provide more conclusive results. Proposed monitoring program including detailed The monitoring program that was undertaken for this report was submitted to DME (Mitchell Memo information on methodology, timing, team etc. Rider) of 1 February 2016. A suggested monitoring program for ongoing monitoring is provided in Appendix A. Appendix A Compare species sown with what species are Given the presence of numerous woody plants the revegetation method and timing of works 4 present, considering germination testing results; can be considered appropriate to allow woody plants to establish.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Excursion Report July 2019
    July 2019 Number 193 In this issue... Excursion report July 2019..................................................1 Cooktown Botanic Gardens Work Party 2019...............................1 Species List .........................................5 Australian Native Plants Society (Australia) - 2019 Conference............................................8 Excursion report Blooming Biodiversity............8 Albany, Western Australia July 2019 - 29th September to 4 October 2019..............................8 Cooktown Botanic Gardens Work Party 2019 Mystery Styphelia Update.......8 Don Lawie and Stuart Worboys What's Happening.........................9 Cooktown Botanic Gardens is Queensland's Cairns Branch.............................9 northern-most botanic gardens. Established Townsville Branch....................9 not long after the town's birth in 1873, the gardens are home to historic stone-pitched Tablelands Branch...................9 waterways. and grand and unusual heritage trees. They also lie a short distance from the Endeavour River, where in 1770 Cook beached his damaged ship for repairs after an unfortunate interaction with the Great Barrier Reef. Page 1 During their sevenSGAP Cairnsweek enforcedBranch - Newsletterstay, the 193 botanist Joseph Banks, naturalist wet season plus much work has Daniels Solander and their party resulted in a green outlook of surveyed and collected more neat graveled pathways, low key extensively than anywhere else on but effective fencing, and trees, their voyage, making Cooktown shrubs and vines all thriving and arguably the birthplace of well mulched. An efficient but Australian scientific botany. unobtrusive “pop-up” watering Since 1987, Cooktown Botanic system has assisted with Gardens has been the semi-regular maintaining growth. mid-year destination for Cairns and Tablelands branches of SGAP. Over the decades, we have assisted with tasks across the gardens, from weeding to planting, from mulching to bridge renovations.
    [Show full text]
  • MVG04 Tropical Eucalypt Open Forests DRAFT
    MVG 4 - TROPICAL EUCALYPT OPEN FORESTS Tropical eucalypt savanna forest Kakadu National Park, NT (Photo: D. Keith) Overview Also known as tropical savannas. MVG 4 occurs in high rainfall areas of Cape York in Queensland, on Melville and Bathurst Islands, the Top End in Northern Territory, and in Western Australia close to Kimberley coast. Structurally it is an open forest with a tall grass-dominated groundlayer. Dominated by eucalypts, primarily species of Corymbia and Eucalyptus, notably the subgenera Fibridia and Leprolaena, but the tree canopy also includes a range of tropical non-eucalypt genera. The grassy understorey is dominated by annual and perennial species exclusively with C4 photosynthetic pathways. Closely associated with tropical monsoonal climates with wet summers and dry winters. Regularly fire-prone in dry seasons. Facts and figures Major Vegetation Group MVG 4 – Tropical Eucalypt Open Forests Major Vegetation Subgroups xx. Tropical eucalypt savanna forest NT, QLD, WA (number of NVIS descriptions) Typical NVIS structural formations Low open forest Number of IBRA regions 26 Most extensive in IBRA region Est. pre-1750: Jarrah Forest (WA) (Est. pre-1750 and present) Present: Nandewar (NSW) Estimated pre-1750 extent (km2) 4 726 Present extent (km2) 3 952 Area protected (km2) 1 417 Structure and physiognomy Open forests dominated by eucalypts with tall grass dominated understories. Trees are taller with straighter boles and the canopy cover is greater than in the savanna woodlands of MVG 12. Leaves of the tree canopies are sclerophyllous and vary in size from notophyll (20 – 45 cm2) to mesophyll (45 – 150 cm2). Broad-leaved shrubs, palms and cycads occur in the understorey (Dunlop 2001; Beard et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Gulf, Queensland
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION on the TIWI ISLANDS, NORTHERN TERRITORY: Part 1. Environments and Plants
    BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION ON THE TIWI ISLANDS, NORTHERN TERRITORY: Part 1. Environments and plants Report prepared by John Woinarski, Kym Brennan, Ian Cowie, Raelee Kerrigan and Craig Hempel. Darwin, August 2003 Cover photo: Tall forests dominated by Darwin stringybark Eucalyptus tetrodonta, Darwin woollybutt E. miniata and Melville Island Bloodwood Corymbia nesophila are the principal landscape element across the Tiwi islands (photo: Craig Hempel). i SUMMARY The Tiwi Islands comprise two of Australia’s largest offshore islands - Bathurst (with an area of 1693 km 2) and Melville (5788 km 2) Islands. These are Aboriginal lands lying about 20 km to the north of Darwin, Northern Territory. The islands are of generally low relief with relatively simple geological patterning. They have the highest rainfall in the Northern Territory (to about 2000 mm annual average rainfall in the far north-west of Melville and north of Bathurst). The human population of about 2000 people lives mainly in the three towns of Nguiu, Milakapati and Pirlangimpi. Tall forests dominated by Eucalyptus miniata, E. tetrodonta, and Corymbia nesophila cover about 75% of the island area. These include the best developed eucalypt forests in the Northern Territory. The Tiwi Islands also include nearly 1300 rainforest patches, with floristic composition in many of these patches distinct from that of the Northern Territory mainland. Although the total extent of rainforest on the Tiwi Islands is small (around 160 km 2 ), at an NT level this makes up an unusually high proportion of the landscape and comprises between 6 and 15% of the total NT rainforest extent. The Tiwi Islands also include nearly 200 km 2 of “treeless plains”, a vegetation type largely restricted to these islands.
    [Show full text]
  • <I>Ustilago-Sporisorium-Macalpinomyces</I>
    Persoonia 29, 2012: 55–62 www.ingentaconnect.com/content/nhn/pimj REVIEW ARTICLE http://dx.doi.org/10.3767/003158512X660283 A review of the Ustilago-Sporisorium-Macalpinomyces complex A.R. McTaggart1,2,3,5, R.G. Shivas1,2, A.D.W. Geering1,2,5, K. Vánky4, T. Scharaschkin1,3 Key words Abstract The fungal genera Ustilago, Sporisorium and Macalpinomyces represent an unresolved complex. Taxa within the complex often possess characters that occur in more than one genus, creating uncertainty for species smut fungi placement. Previous studies have indicated that the genera cannot be separated based on morphology alone. systematics Here we chronologically review the history of the Ustilago-Sporisorium-Macalpinomyces complex, argue for its Ustilaginaceae resolution and suggest methods to accomplish a stable taxonomy. A combined molecular and morphological ap- proach is required to identify synapomorphic characters that underpin a new classification. Ustilago, Sporisorium and Macalpinomyces require explicit re-description and new genera, based on monophyletic groups, are needed to accommodate taxa that no longer fit the emended descriptions. A resolved classification will end the taxonomic confusion that surrounds generic placement of these smut fungi. Article info Received: 18 May 2012; Accepted: 3 October 2012; Published: 27 November 2012. INTRODUCTION TAXONOMIC HISTORY Three genera of smut fungi (Ustilaginomycotina), Ustilago, Ustilago Spo ri sorium and Macalpinomyces, contain about 540 described Ustilago, derived from the Latin ustilare (to burn), was named species (Vánky 2011b). These three genera belong to the by Persoon (1801) for the blackened appearance of the inflores- family Ustilaginaceae, which mostly infect grasses (Begerow cence in infected plants, as seen in the type species U.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 112 SEPTEMBER 2002 Price: $5.00
    No. 112 SEPTEMBER 2002 Price: $5.00 AUSTRALIAN SYSTEMATIC BOTANY SOCIETY INCORPORATED Office Bearers President Vice President Stephen Hopper John Clarkson Kings Park & Botanic Garden Centre for Tropical Agriculture West Perth PO Box 1054 WA 6005 Mareeba QLD tel: (08) 9480 3605 tel: (07) 4048 4745 email: [email protected] email: [email protected] Secretary Treasurer Brendan Lepschi Anthony Whalen Centre for Plant Biodiversity Research Centre for Plant Biodiversity Research Australian National Herbarium Australian National Herbarium GPO Box 1600, Canberra GPO Box 1600, Canberra ACT 2601 ACT 2601 tel: (02) 6246 5167 tel: (02) 6246 5175 email: [email protected] email: [email protected] Councillor Councillor R.O.(Bob) Makinson Andrew Rozefelds Royal Botanic Gardens Sydney Tasmanian Herbarium Mrs Macquaries Road GPO Box 252-40 Sydney NSW 2000 Hobart, Tasmania 7001 tel: (02) 9231 8111 tel.: (03) 6226 2635 email: [email protected] email: [email protected] Public Officer Annette Wilson Australian Biological Resources Study Environment Australia GPO Box 787 CANBERRA ACT 2601 tel: (02) 6250 9417 email: [email protected] Affiliate Society Papua New Guinea Botanical Society ASBS Web site www.anbg.gov.au/asbs Webmaster: Murray Fagg Centre for Plant Biodiversity Research Australian National Herbarium Email: [email protected] Loose-leaf inclusions with this issue · CSIRO Publishing advertising catalogue · Notice re September 2003 Plant Systematics in Australia conference in Melbourne Publication dates of previous issue Austral.Syst.Bot.Soc.Nsltr 111 (June 2002 issue) Hardcopy: 12th July 2002; ASBS Web site: 12th July 2002 Australian Systematic Botany Society Newsletter 112 (September 2002) ASBS Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Pasture Condition Guide for the Ord River Catchment
    Bulletin 4769 Department of June 2009 Agriculture and Food ISSN 1833-7236 Pasture condition guide for the Ord River Catchment Department of Agriculture and Food Pasture condition guide for the Ord River Catchment K. Ryan, E. Tierney & P. Novelly Copyright © Western Australian Agriculture Authority, 2009 Acknowledgements Photographs by S. Eyres and the Department of Agriculture and Food, Western Australia (DAFWA) Photographic Unit The information in this publication has been developed in consultation with experienced rangelands field staff providing services to the East Kimberley pastoral leases and with reference to Range Condition Guides for the West Kimberley Area, WA (Payne, Kubicki and Wilcox 1974) and Lands of the Ord–Victoria Area, WA and NT (Stewart et al. 1970). The authors would like to thank all those who provided valuable feedback on the design and content of this guide, including Andrew Craig, David Hadden and Matthew Fletcher (DAFWA Kununurra), Simon Eyres (DAFWA Photographic Unit), Alan Payne (retired DAFWA rangelands advisor), and members of the Halls Creek—East Kimberley Land Conservation District. This project was funded by Rangelands NRM WA using National Action Plan for Salinity and Water Quality funding. Rangelands NRM WA regards this project as a strategic investment which will contribute to an improved understanding and awareness of pasture condition in the Ord Catchment, leading to improved land management in that area. Rangelands NRM WA contracted the Department of Agriculture and Food WA to undertake the project. Funding for the National Action Plan for Salinity and Water Quality was provided by the Australian and Western Australian Governments. Disclaimer The Chief Executive Officer of the Department of Agriculture and Food and the State of Western Australia accept no liability whatsoever by reason of negligence or otherwise arising from the use or release of this information or any part of it.
    [Show full text]
  • Guava (Eucalyptus) Rust Puccinia Psidii
    INDUSTRY BIOSECURITY PLAN FOR THE NURSERY & GARDEN INDUSTRY Threat Specific Contingency Plan Guava (eucalyptus) rust Puccinia psidii Plant Health Australia March 2009 Disclaimer The scientific and technical content of this document is current to the date published and all efforts were made to obtain relevant and published information on the pest. New information will be included as it becomes available, or when the document is reviewed. The material contained in this publication is produced for general information only. It is not intended as professional advice on any particular matter. No person should act or fail to act on the basis of any material contained in this publication without first obtaining specific, independent professional advice. Plant Health Australia and all persons acting for Plant Health Australia in preparing this publication, expressly disclaim all and any liability to any persons in respect of anything done by any such person in reliance, whether in whole or in part, on this publication. The views expressed in this publication are not necessarily those of Plant Health Australia. Further information For further information regarding this contingency plan, contact Plant Health Australia through the details below. Address: Suite 5, FECCA House 4 Phipps Close DEAKIN ACT 2600 Phone: +61 2 6215 7700 Fax: +61 2 6260 4321 Email: [email protected] Website: www.planthealthaustralia.com.au PHA & NGIA | Contingency Plan – Guava rust (Puccinia psidii) 1 Purpose and background of this contingency plan .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Vegetation Classification and the International Vegetation Classification Framework: an Overview with Case Studies
    Australian Journal of Botany © CSIRO 2021 https://doi.org/10.1071/BT20076_AC Supplementary material Australian Vegetation Classification and the International Vegetation Classification framework: an overview with case studies Esteban H. MuldavinA,G, Eda AddicottB,F, John T. HunterC, Donna LewisD and Don Faber-LangendoenE ANatural Heritage New Mexico, Biology Department, MSC03 2020, 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001, USA. BQueensland Herbarium, Department of Environmental Science, Brisbane Botanic Gardens Mount Coot-tha, Mt Coot-tha Road, Toowong Qld 40066, Australia. CSchool of Environmental & Rural Science, Natural Resources Building, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia. DNorthern Territory Herbarium, Department of Environment, Parks and Water Security, PO Box 496, Palmerston, NT 0831, Australia. ENatureServe, 2550 South Clark Street, Suite 930, Arlington, VA 22202, USA. FAustralian Tropical Herbarium, James Cook University, PO Box 6811, Cairns, Qld 4870, Australia. GCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Page 1 of 14 Characterising species for Australian Darwin Stringybark Scleromorphic Woodland Macrogroup (Eucalyptus tetrodonta Scleromorphic Woodland macrogroup), Groups and Alliances Methods for determining Characterising species are outlined in the Methods section of the manuscript. Table S1. Characterising species for Australian Darwin Stringybark Scleromorphic Woodland Macrogroup (Eucalyptus tetrodonta Scleromorphic Woodland Macrogroup) and for Corymbia ferruginea and Eucalyptus tetrodonta
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Territory NT Page 1 of 204 21-Jan-11 Species List for NRM Region Northern Territory, Northern Territory
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Sites on the Northern Australian Tropical Transect
    S ummary of Sites on the Northern Australian Tropical Transect 2016 Ubirr Wetland, Kakadu National Park Acknowledgments AusPlots work would not be possible without siggnficant help from a range of people. Ausplots gratefully acknowledges Professor Alan Anderson for all of his help and support of the project. Thanks, are also due to the staff from Kakadu, in particular Kasia Gabrys, and to Dr Alaric fisher and Tahnee Thompson from the NT Deparment of Land Resource Management. AusPlots also acknowledges and thanks the traditional owners of Kakadu and all of the other landowners for allowing access to their land. Thanks, are also due the many volunteers who helped out with the field work and with the curation and processing of the data and samples and to the staff at the NT Herbarium, in particular Nick Cuff and Ian Cowie, for undertaking the plant identfications. Contents Introduction......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Accessing the Data ............................................................................................................................................... 3 Point intercept data .................................................................................................................................... 3 Plant collections .......................................................................................................................................... 3 Leaf tissue samples.....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Palatability of Forage Plants in North-West Sheep Pastures
    Journal of the Department of Agriculture, Western Australia, Series 4 Volume 2 Number 9 September, 1961 Article 12 1-1-1961 Palatability of forage plants in North-west sheep pastures R H. Collett Follow this and additional works at: https://researchlibrary.agric.wa.gov.au/journal_agriculture4 Part of the Environmental Health and Protection Commons, Nutritional Epidemiology Commons, and the Plant Biology Commons Recommended Citation Collett, R H. (1961) "Palatability of forage plants in North-west sheep pastures," Journal of the Department of Agriculture, Western Australia, Series 4: Vol. 2 : No. 9 , Article 12. Available at: https://researchlibrary.agric.wa.gov.au/journal_agriculture4/vol2/iss9/12 This article is brought to you for free and open access by Research Library. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Department of Agriculture, Western Australia, Series 4 by an authorized administrator of Research Library. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Palatably of Forage Plants in North-West Sheep Pastures Continuous selective grazing has reduced the palatable woollybutt grass (Eragrostis eriopoda) to dead butts By R. H. COLLETT, Field Technician, Abydos ?#£££ Xtelf ^ leSS Palatable S°" SPtniteX k DECLINE in carrying capacity has occurred in large areas of the Pilbara district -^™- of the North-West, due to the decrease in palatable plants and the increase in unpalatable ones. The relative palatability of the various species to sheep is there­ fore a matter of considerable importance to pastoralists. Observations at Abydos Research Station most palatable species. Woollybutt grass near Port Hedland have shown that the is the third preference but it shares this sheep's grazing year can be divided into position with soft spinifex (Triodia pun- approximately four seasons or stages ac­ gens) in its first year of growth.
    [Show full text]