The Newton Stone. by the Eight Hon. the Earl of Southesk, K.T., F.S.A
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
I. THE NEWTON STONE. BY THE EIGHT HON. THE EARL OF SOUTHESK, K.T., F.S.A. SCOT. Introduction.—For more than seventy years the inscribed pillar-stone at Newton has been familiarly known to antiquaries, yet, notwithstanding many attempts to decipher them, its two remarkable inscriptions remain unread. To what this may be owing—whether to insufficient care in some cases, or to erroneous theories, or to the use of faulty copies taken from casts and sketches—it is needless at present to inquire; it will be admitted that no complete or satisfactory reading has been offered by the many learned men who have written on the subject. Through the kindness of Mr Gordon, the owner of Newton, I have had several opportunities for minute and lengthened study of the stone. I have also been supplied with photograph e inscriptionsth f so , taken ni presence of Mr Gordon and myself; some of which are from fresh points of view, to illustrate peculiarities in the lettering. These photographs are trustworth importane on n yi t respect I refe; r chalkin e toth g required to bring out the forms clearly,—a process which has often led to error, for photographn i s false chalk-mark hardln sca e distinguisheyb d from true. In the present case, the scores and letters were very carefully chalked by myself, wit r Gordon'M h s held advicepan anythind an , g that remained 2 2 PfiOCEEDING SOCIETYE TH F SO , DECEMBEE 11,1S82. doubtful, through wear or original imperfection, has been duly mentioned in my notes. Aware of these advantages, and not unconscious of considerable labour in the collation of alphabets and in other modes of research, I submit with some hopefulnes readin w e inscriptionsne th a f s go ; trusting that, at the least, my work may prove useful even to those who differ from mo, and that abler scholars than myself will perfect wha s faulti t r yo incomplete. At the beginning of my task the inscriptions seemed to be revealing themselves as brief sepulchral records, similar to those on the Irish and British monumental stones s regardA .e Oghamth e s th d par f an so t Main Inscription this view is accurate, but I have discovered that the other part of the Main Inscription differs widely from the rest,—that it religioua s i s invocation l evental t a a sentenc sr o , e fulf termo a l f o s mythological and foreign character. Knowing the tendency of modern scholarship to disallow the theories of such writer Higginss sa , Vallancey d Daviesan , havo wh e, striveno to , often fancifully o connect , e creed th td language an s e Easth tf o swit h thos Britaif eo Irelandd nan I shoul, d gladly have accepted less question- able conclusion s: nevertheless truth mus followee thin i b t sd casan d; e there may be gain in doing so, for if it can be shown that the old religions of Alban were allied to any known form of civilised Paganism, hop y lone w er ema o discove g t e meanin th re symbol e th th f g o n so Sculptured Stones. Though unwilling to lengthen this paper, I find it difficult to treat so complex a subject except in considerable detail, and I must further ask leav o submit e t some prefatory remarke historth d surn o san y - rounding e Newtoth e f naturs o sinscriptionsth it n n f o eo Ston d an e , also on certain form f Paganisso mthein i r relation ono st f theo o inscrip- tions,—for without such aids I fear lest my reading should be held too improbable to be v/orthy the attention I seek for it. r brevity'Fo s sake I ,hav e condense s possiblea r notey fa d dm s an a ,s e samfoth r e reaso I nhav e frequently abstained from strengtheninr go THE NEWTON STONE. 23 qualifyin statementy m g referencey b s d citation an sexpressiony b r o s s of doubt. On these points I hope it will be understood—(1) that there is pre- sumably competen statementy t m authorit t l al no r thao ) sd fo y(2 ; I t commit writermysely viewe an th f o t so f ,hav y whateveema madI e us re of his works; (3) that none of my remarks have a dogmatic meaning, even when they chance beao t ,e for th rf assertion mo . List lessof obvious Abbreviations. Ast., for Astle, The Origin and Progress of Writing, 1803. Bor., „ Borlase, Antiquities of Cornwall, 1769. Brash, „ Brash, The Ogam Inscribed Monuments of the Gaedhil, 1879. Bryant, „ Bryant, Analysis of Ancient Mythology, 1807. Eltou, „ Elton, Origins of English History, 1882. Faul., „ Faulmann, Das Buch tier Schrift, 1880. Fry, „ Fry, Pantographia, 1799. Ges., „ Gesenius, Scripturae Linguseque Phoenicia), 1837. Herbert, „ Herbert, Neo-drnidie Essath n yo c Heresy, 1838. Higgins, „ Higgins, The Celtic Druids, 1829. Hub., „ Htibiier, Inscriptiones Britannise Christianse, 1876. H.S.D., „ Highland Society's Gaelic Dictionary, 1828. Keane, „ Keane, Towers and Temples of Ancient Ireland, 1867. King, „ King Gnostice Th , theid san r Remains, 1864. O'B., „ O'Brien, Irish Dictionary ed.d ,2n , 1832. O'E., „ O'Eeilly, Irish Dictionary, 1821. Petrie, „ Petrie Ecclesiasticae Th , l Architectur Irelandf eo , 1845. Prinsep, „ Prinsep, Essays on Indian Antiquities, 1858. Eawlinson, „ Eawlinson, The Five Great Monarchies, 1873. St.Sc , „ Sculptured Stone Scotlandf so , Spalding Club. Skene, „ Skene, The Four Ancient Books of Wales, 1868. Stephens, „ Stephens, The Old-Northern Eunic Monuments, 1866- 1868. Taylor, „ Taylor, Greeks and Goths, 1879. West., „ Westwood, Palseographia sacra Pictoria. Vail., „ Vallancey, Collectanea de Rebus Hibernicis, 1786-1818. B. of Arm., ,, Book of Armagh. B. of Bal., „ Book of Ballymote. •24 PROCEEDING E SOCIETYTH F O S , DECEMBE , 188211 R . Of., for Compare. Ins., „ Inscription. Celt, var., „ Celtic, various. Kil. alpli., „ Kilmalkedar Alphabet. M. Ins., „ Main Inscription, at Newton. Min., „ Minuscule. N. St., „ Newton Stone. Ogh., „ Ogham. Ogh. Ins., _„ Ogham Inscription t Newtona , . Or. var., „ Oriental, various—chiefly ancient. Pat. Nos., „ Pater Noste Green (i r k letters, Arm.)Bf o . St.S , „ Serpent Stone t Newtona , . St., „ Stone. = „ Equivalen Signifiesr o , to t . Var., „ Various. Description and History.—The. Newton Stone (Sc. St., vol. i. pi. i.) is an unhewn boulder of iron-grey quartzose gneiss, flattened on the face, but otherwise of rounded forms; 6J feet in height above the ground, and about 5J feet in its general girth. On its face it bears an inscription of six horizontal line vern si y peculiar characters d towardan , lefs sit t angle there is another inscription comprising two perpendicular lines in Oghams. e ston Th t presena e t stande lawth t Newtona n s o Aberdeenshiren i , , abou yard0 7 t s fro housee easterlmn th a n i , y direction. Besid t standei s another stone, very similar in size and character (Sc. St., vol. i. pi. xxxvii.), engrave whichn o n , beneat e symbolicahth l double disc, there appear largsa beautifully-formed ean d serpent, barred wit Z-shapee hth d sceptre symbol. Newtoe Th n Stone originally stooa plantatio n di n near Shevack toll- e slopa hil th barf lo n e o abov, e Shevack Burn s inscriptionIt . s were first noticed about 1803 ,roa d beew wheha dne n a nopenee th n i d movevicinitys sita wa eo t dt I behin. d Newton House about 1837d an , was placed in its present position in 1873. e SerpenTh t Stone originally stood beside Newtone th Stone. This sha never been doubte e districtth n di , though written evidenc e facth tf o e wantings i . Some time during last centur e ston s taketh y wa e n away 5 2 THE NEWTON STONE. from Slievack, with intention, it is said, to use it elsewhere as a march- stone, but difficulty occurring in traversing a swampy place, it was finally left there, about three-quarter a mil f o es fro s supposeit m d destination. Its position on that site is noted in a Newton estate plan of 1760. Abou agais t 179wa n t i 4moved , thi se sit th time o behint e d Newton House. Tradition state s remova it tha n o t l from Shevack, twelve oxen could scarcely drag it; n wherea s returnma it e n o son , (John Beattie gred )ol ywite maron h e easily brough t backi t . This trivial story proves the existence of a belief in the association of the two stones, or, at all events, that the Serpent Stone had made a journey befor lass it e t removal n 187I stonee . 3th s were placed togethe thein o r r present site. It may be added, that at the trenching of the Shevack locality, about 1837, human remains were found buried in the earth within a few yards of the original site of the inscribed stone (So. St., vol. i. p. 1). The whole surrounding distric f "Tho t e Gariocb, parise wels th " a s ha l of Culsalmond, to which these stones immediately belong, abounds to an extraordinary extent with the relics of ancient Paganism. From Shevack may be seen (where not hidden by recent plantations) the Moor of Garden, Logie-Elphinstone th site f th eo e f stoneswhico e hon , bear a scircula r Ogham inscription (Sc. St., vol. i. pis. iii. iv.); the Standing Stone, on Candle Hil f Eayneo l Maidee th ; n Stone (Sc.