Mayor 515 Little Canada Road East John T. Keis Little Canada, MN 55117

Council Members www.littlecanadamn.org Tom Fischer Michael McGraw City Administrator Rick Montour Chris Heineman Christian Torkelson

Regular Meeting of the Little Canada City Council

Wednesday, October 14, 2020 6:00 p.m. Virtual Meeting A G E N D A 1. CALL TO ORDER - Workshop Meeting - 6:00 P.m.

2. Roll Call

3. Workshop Topics

A. Update On COVID-19 Expenditures Related To The Federal CARES Act

Documents:

WORKSHOP - CARES ACT FUND UPDATE.PDF

B. Discuss 2021 - 2025 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)

Documents:

CIP BOOKLET UPDATED 10-09-2020.PDF

C. Discuss Stormwater Utility Information

Documents:

WORKSHOP - STORMWATER UTILITY INFORMATION.PDF WESTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY STORMWATER UTILITY SURVEY 2019.PDF

4. Adjourn

This agenda is subject to change by additions and deletions.

STAFF REPORT

TO: Mayor Keis and Members of the City Council

FROM: Chris Heineman, City Administrator Brenda Malinowski, Finance Director

DATE: October 8, 2020

RE: CARES Act Update

DISCUSSION Council may provide further direction regarding the potential uses of CARES Act resources.

BACKGROUND The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act provided federal funds to the State of Minnesota. The State Legislature and ultimately the Governor thereby distributed these funds to local governments throughout Minnesota to deal with the financial impacts of COVID-19. The City of Little Canada received CARES Act funds of $782,484 in July. Under current guidance, any unused funds as of November 15, 2020 will need to be returned.

CARES Act funds are to be used to provide economic relief to the protect the American people from the public health and economic impacts of COVID-19.

The United States Treasury has issued guidance related to the use of these funds and is periodically revising this guidance. The CARES Act provides that payments from the Fund may only be used to cover costs that are: 1. Necessary expenditures incurred due to the public health emergency with respect to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19); 2. Not accounted for in the budget most recently approved as of March 27, 2020 (the date of enactment of the CARES Act) for the State or government; and 3. Incurred during the period that begins on March 1, 2020, and ends on November 15, 2020.

Funds not used by November 15th, must be returned to Regions Hospital or another hospital in Ramsey County.

Per the guidance, these funds may not be used to replace lost revenues of the government.

Eligible uses of the funds are as follows: • Medical Expenses • Public Health Expenses • Payroll Expense • Public Health Measures • Economic Support • Other

The 1st monthly report was submitted in September. The 2nd monthly report will be approved at the Council meeting on October 14th. A “single audit” at the end of the year will need to conducted to confirm the proper use of the funds. Any fund expended in a manner contrary to federal or state guidance will need to be repaid.

Public Safety

The Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF) Guidance dated 09-02-2020 indicates that local governments “may presume that payroll costs for the public health and public safety employees are payments for services substantially dedicated to mitigating or responding to the COVID-19 public health emergency, unless the chief executive (or equivalent) of the relevant government determines that specific circumstances indicate otherwise.”

On September 21st, the Department of the Treasury, Office of the Inspector General (OIG) released new guidance regarding documentation required for using CARES Act Funds to cover payroll costs for public health and safety employees. Per the new OIG guidance, governments can presume that all payroll costs for public health and public safety employees are payments for services sustainably dedicated to mitigating or responding to the COVID-19 public health emergency.

Exerts from the new guidance regarding OIG’s responses regarding public health and public safety employees:

70. To what level of documentation will a government be held to support the reimbursement of public health and safety payroll that was "presumed" to be substantially dedicated to mitigating the emergency?

The recipient of CRF payments must maintain and make available to Treasury OIG upon request, all documents and financial records sufficient to establish compliance with subsection 601(d) of the Social Security Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 801(d)). Documents/records include payroll records for the covered period March 1 through December 30, 2020. Records include, but are not limited to (1) general and subsidiary ledgers used to account for the receipt of CRF payments and subsequent disbursements; and (2) payroll, time, and human resource records to support costs incurred for payroll expenses. Please refer to the Treasury OIG memorandum, Coronavirus Relief Fund Reporting and Record Retention Requirements (OIG-20-021; July 2, 2020). These document requirements apply to supporting payroll reimbursement amounts using CRF proceeds and not to support the presumption that public health and safety payroll is substantially dedicated to mitigating the emergency.

(a) Will a government have to demonstrate/substantiate that a public health or public safety employee's function/duties were in fact substantially dedicated to mitigating the emergency?

No, the government will not have to demonstrate/substantiate that a public health or public safety employee’s function/duties were substantially dedicated to mitigating the emergency but must maintain records and documentation supporting payroll amounts reimbursed using CRF proceeds. As indicated in Treasury’s Guidance, as an administrative accommodation, governments may presume that public health and public safety employees meet the substantially dedicated test, unless the chief executive (or equivalent) of the relevant government determines that specific circumstances indicate otherwise. Treasury’s FAQs add that entire payroll cost of an employee whose time is substantially dedicated to mitigating or responding to the COVID-19 public health emergency is eligible, provided that such payroll costs are incurred by December 30, 2020.

(b) For payroll that was accounted for in the FY2020 budget but was then "presumed" to be substantially dedicated to mitigating the emergency, will the government have to demonstrate/substantiate that a public health or public safety employee's function was a substantially different use?

No, the government will not have to demonstrate/substantiate that a budgeted public health or public safety employee’s function was a substantially different use. As stated in Treasury’s Guidance, within the category of substantially different uses, Treasury has included payroll and benefits expenses for public safety, public health, health care, human services, and similar employees whose services are substantially dedicated to mitigating or responding to the COVID-19 public health emergency. The Treasury OIG does require the government to maintain budgetary records to support the fiscal years 2019 and 2020 budgets.

71. Is the government required to perform any analysis or maintain documentation of the “substantially dedicated” conclusion for payroll expenses of public safety, public health, health care, and human service employees? No, the government is not required to perform an analysis or maintain documentation of the substantially dedicated conclusion for payroll expenses of public safety, public health, health care, and human service employees. As indicated in Treasury’s Guidance, as an administrative accommodation, governments may presume that public health and public safety employees meet the substantially dedicated test, unless the chief executive (or equivalent) of the relevant government determines that specific circumstances indicate otherwise.

Business Outreach and Assistance

Staff will update Council at the workshop regarding use of the CARES Act funds for business assistance.

ATTACHMENTS 1. CARES Act Funding Summary with details for August Report, September Report, and possible Future Reports 2. Possible Resolution relating to Public Safety 3. Minnesota Management and Budget (MMB) Category Explanations for Reporting Cares Act Funds-City of Little Canada

Category Type Reporting Period August September Future Total Administrative Expenses $ - $ - $ 3,870.28 $ 3,870.28 Personnel to different use 1,409.40 31,990.30 33,399.70 Telework Capabilities 3,351.03 788.46 135.00 4,274.49 Payroll for Public Health and Safety Employees 705,532.47 705,532.47 Personal Protective Equipment 29,528.59 29,528.59 Public Health Expenses 7,279.74 2,672.05 9,100.83 19,052.62 12,040.17$ 12,040.17$ 3,460.51$ $ 776,287.18 $ 791,787.86

Cares Act Fund Allocation 782,484.00

Amount under (over) funding (9,303.86) City of Little Canada CARES Act Funding-August Report Check Date Check Number Vendor Description Use Type for MMB Reporting Amount Payroll Families First Act Payroll Expense Personnel to different use $ 1,409.40 Personnel to different use Total 1,409.40 8/26/2020 72567 SHI Laptop for remote work-Customer Service Representative Telework Capabilities 1,298.00 8/26/2020 72567 SHI Laptop for remote work-Accountant Telework Capabilities 1,303.03 8/12/2020 72471 City of Roseville Remote Desktop Use Access through 12/31/2020 (4 Computers) Telework Capabilities 300.00 (Accountant, Utility Billing Clerk, Public Works Director, Parks & Recreation Coordinator) 4/10/2020 Payroll Cell Phone Reimbursement for working remotely-April Telework Capabilities 90.00 (Accountant, Utility Billing Clerk, Customer Service Representative) 5/8/2020 Payroll Cell Phone Reimbursement for working remotely-May Telework Capabilities 90.00 6/5/2020 Payroll Cell Phone Reimbursement for working remotely-June Telework Capabilities 90.00 7/3/2020 Payroll Cell Phone Reimbursement for working remotely-July Telework Capabilities 90.00 8/14/2020 Payroll Cell Phone Reimbursement for working remotely-August Telework Capabilities 90.00 Telework Capabilities Total 3,351.03 8/12/2020 72513 Amazon.com Cover for Web Cam Public Health Expenses 19.98 7/22/2020 72446 SOS Office Desk surface in order to socially distance offices Public Health Expenses 365.00 5/13/2020 72203 SOS Office Plexiglass for front counter Public Health Expenses 233.75 8/12/2020 72490 Newegg Digital Thermometers (4) for CH, P&R programming, elections Public Health Expenses 137.41 6/10/2020 72299 Menards Disposable Masks-for Parks & Recreation Public Health Expenses 126.72 7/8/2020 72407 Menards Disposable Masks-for Public Works Public Health Expenses 126.72 7/22/2020 72425 Grainger Disposable Masks Public Health Expenses 83.76 7/8/2020 72407 72407 Electronic switch adapter Public Health Expenses 42.84 6/10/2020 72299 Bent Brewstillery Hand Sanitizer for Public Works, City Hall, and Parks Public Health Expenses 120.00 6/10/2020 72299 Frattalone's Hand Sanitizer for Public Works and Parks Public Health Expenses 34.32 6/10/2020 72299 Frattalone's Hand Sanitizer for Parks and City Hall; Cleaning wipes Public Health Expenses 79.39 7/8/2020 72407 Amazon.com Hand Sanitizer for Public Works & City Hall Public Health Expenses 74.98 8/12/2020 72513 Napa Auto Hand Sanitizer for Public Works Public Health Expenses 5.99 8/12/2020 72513 Amazon.com Hand Sanitizer for Parks & Rec Public Health Expenses 48.00 8/12/2020 72513 Amazon.com Hand Sanitizer for Farmers Market Public Health Expenses 34.44 8/12/2020 72513 Amazon.com Head sets for virtual meetings (Council, PW Director, and Parks Director) Public Health Expenses 654.78 8/26/2020 72552 Office Depot One time use pens Public Health Expenses 73.35 4/22/2020 72126 Advantage Signs Signage in Parks related to COVID-19 Public Health Expenses 128.94 8/12/2020 72513 Amazon.com Standing Hand Sanitizer Stations for City Center(2), and Farmers Market Public Health Expenses 899.97 7/8/2020 72407 Amazon.com Under cabinet lighting for socially distance offices Public Health Expenses 34.28 8/12/2020 72513 Amazon.com Web Cam for virtual meetings Public Health Expenses 124.99 8/12/2020 72513 Amazon.com Web Cam for virtual meetings Public Health Expenses 124.99 6/10/2020 72299 Newegg Wireless display connection for PW (Remote Meeting Capability) Public Health Expenses 59.99 6/10/2020 72278 Menards Wood for plexiglass installation at front counter Public Health Expenses 11.95 6/10/2020 72299 Zoom Zoom for virtual meetings 05/02/2020 to 06/01/2020 Public Health Expenses 13.89 7/8/2020 72407 Zoom Zoom for virtual meetings 06/01/2020 to 07/01/2020 Public Health Expenses 14.99 8/12/2020 72513 Zoom Zoom for virtual meetings 07/02/2020 to 08/01/2020 Public Health Expenses 14.99 4/8/2020 72088 CTV Virtual Meeting Charge (March 25th) Public Health Expenses 75.00 5/27/2020 72222 CTV Virtual Meeting Charge (April 8th, 9th, and 22nd) Public Health Expenses 225.00 6/24/2020 72312 CTV Virtual Meeting Charge (May 7th, 13th, 14th, and 27th) Public Health Expenses 300.00 7/22/2020 72419 CTV Virtual Meeting Charge (June 10th, 11th, and 24th) Public Health Expenses 225.00 8/26/2020 72529 CTV Virtual Meeting Charge (July 8th, 9th, and 22nd) Public Health Expenses 225.00 7/22/2020 72437 On-Site Extra porta potty at Pioneer due to COVID-19 (07/11 -08/07) Public Health Expenses 69.64 8/26/2020 72554 On-Site Extra porta potty at Pioneer due to COVID-19 (08/08 -09/04) Public Health Expenses 65.00 7/22/2020 72426 StarkMan LLC Duct Cleaning Due to COVID-19 (City Center) Public Health Expenses 2,404.69 Public Health Expenses Total 7,279.74 August Grand Total $ 4,760.43 City of Little Canada CARES Act Funding -September Report

Check Check Date Number Vendor Description Use Type for MMB Reporting Amount 9/23/2020 72666 SHI Dock for Laptop for remote work-Customer Service Representative Telework Capabilities 201.82 9/23/2020 72666 SHI Dock for Laptop for remote work-Accountant Telework Capabilities 201.82 9/23/2020 72639 Dell Monitors for laptops for remote work (Accountant) Telework Capabilities 294.82 9/11/2020 Payroll Cell Phone Reimbursement for working remotely-September Telework Capabilities 90.00 (Accountant, Utility Billing Clerk, Customer Service Representative) Telework Capabilities Total 788.46 7/8/2020 72407 Correction from August Report Public Health Expenses (42.84) 8/26/2020 72529 CTV Permanent Zoom Installation down payment Public Health Expenses 800.00 9/9/2020 72594 Mark Hennum Non contact shields for front office (Receptionist, Account., UB Clerk, Side Public Health Expenses 1,735.00 Counter) 9/9/2020 72614 Safety-Fast Disposable Masks for Public Works Public Health Expenses 59.90 9/9/2020 72624 Bent Brewstillery Hand sanitizer for City Hall Public Health Expenses 40.00 9/9/2020 72624 Zoom Zoom for virtual meetings 08/02/2020 to 09/01/2020 Public Health Expenses 14.99 9/23/2020 72657 On-Site Extra porta potty at Pioneer due to COVID-19 (09/05 -10/02) Public Health Expenses 65.00 Public Health Expenses Total 2,672.05 September Grand Total $ 3,460.51 City of Little Canada CARES Act Funding-Future Expenses

Check Check Date Number Vendor Description Use Type for MMB Reporting Amount Payroll Administrative cost of implementing CRF Funds Administrative Expenses $ 3,870.28 Administrative Expenses Total 3,870.28 Payroll Families First Act Payroll Expense Personnel to different use 1,036.80 Due to Stay at home order 1/2 of PW stayed home each day until new safety guidelines were established. Staff at home Payroll prepped files for scanning (03-30 to 04-13) Personnel to different use 8,884.05

Leadership team creating and implementing safety measures Payroll relating to COVID-19 Personnel to different use 22,069.45 Personnel to different use Total 31,990.30 10/9/2020 Payroll Cell Phone Reimbursement for working remotely-October Telework Capabilities 90.00 11/4/2020 Payroll Cell Phone Reimbursement for working remotely-November Telework Capabilities 45.00 Telework Capabilities Total 135.00 3/11/2020 72022 Ramsey County Payroll Costs-March Payroll for Public Health and Safety Employees 83,003.82 4/22/2020 72147 Ramsey County Payroll Costs-April Payroll for Public Health and Safety Employees 83,003.82 5/13/2020 72198 Ramsey County Payroll Costs-May Payroll for Public Health and Safety Employees 83,003.82 6/10/2020 72243 Ramsey County Payroll Costs-June Payroll for Public Health and Safety Employees 83,003.82 7/22/2020 72289 Ramsey County Payroll Costs-July Payroll for Public Health and Safety Employees 83,003.82 8/12/2020 72443 Ramsey County Payroll Costs-August Payroll for Public Health and Safety Employees 83,003.82 Ramsey County Payroll Costs-September Payroll for Public Health and Safety Employees 83,003.82 Ramsey County Payroll Costs-October Payroll for Public Health and Safety Employees 83,003.82 Ramsey County Payroll Costs-to November 15th Payroll for Public Health and Safety Employees 41,501.91 Payroll for Public Health and Safety Employees Total 705,532.47 LCFD PPE Personal Protective Equipment 2,513.59 Ramsey County Shields, masks, etc. Personal Protective Equipment 27,015.00 Personal Protective Equipment Total 29,528.59 Bipolar Ionization Units at City Hall Public Health Expenses 7,000.00 Amazon Logitech webcam Public Health Expenses 134.98 Amazon Hand Sanitizer for park and recreation programs Public Health Expenses 35.38 Amazon Hand Sanitizer for all departments Public Health Expenses 43.99 CTV Virtual Meeting Charge (August) Public Health Expenses 225.00 CTV Virtual Meeting Charge (September) Public Health Expenses 225.00 CTV Virtual Meeting Charge (October) Public Health Expenses 225.00 CTV Permanent Zoom Installation Public Health Expenses 860.00 Zoom Zoom for virtual meetings 09/02/2020 to 10/01/2020 Public Health Expenses 14.99 Zoom Zoom for virtual meetings 10/02/2020 to 11/01/2020 Public Health Expenses 14.99 Zoom Zoom for virtual meetings 11/02/2020 to 11/15/2020 Public Health Expenses 7.50 Polco Use for Pioneer Park planning process due to COVID-19 Public Health Expenses 249.00 Restrictions On-Site Extra porta potty at Pioneer due to COVID-19 (10/03 -10/30) Public Health Expenses 65.00 Public Health Expenses Total 9,100.83 Future Grand Total $ 776,287.18 CITY OF LITTLE CANADA CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2020- ACCEPTING AND ALLOCATING CARES ACT FUNDING

WHEREAS, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act provided federal funds to the State of Minnesota and the legislature and Governor thereby distributed these funds to local governments throughout Minnesota to deal with the financial impacts of COVID 19; and WHEREAS, the CARES funding requires a three-point test for utilization of the funds that they be: 1. Necessary expenditures for responding to COVID 19, 2. Not accounted for in the original budget process, 3. and incurred during the period of March 1, 2020 to November 15, 2020; and WHEREAS, guidance from the United States Treasury for State, Territorial, Local and Tribal Governments, outlined in their Frequently Asked Questions, most recently updated on September 2, 2020, indicated that local governments "may presume that payroll costs for the public health and public safety employees are payments for services substantially dedicated to mitigating or responding to the COVID-19 public health emergency, unless the chief executive (equivalent) of the relevant government determines that specific circumstances indicate otherwise"; and WHEREAS, guidance from the Inspector General of the United States Treasury for State, Territorial, Local and Tribal GovernmentsDRAFT issued guidance updated on September 21, 2020, indicating that local" governments will not have demonstrate/substantiate that a public health or public safety employee’s function/duties were substantially dedicated to mitigating the emergency but must maintain records and documentation supporting payroll amounts reimbursed using CRF proceeds. As indicated in Treasury’s Guidance, as an administrative accommodation, governments may presume that public health and public safety employees meet the substantially dedicated test, unless the chief executive (or equivalent) of the relevant government determines that specific circumstances indicate otherwise.” and WHEREAS, League of Minnesota Cities and Metro Cities have worked in consultation with Minnesota Management and Budget's Minnesota COVID Response Accountability Office, and the Minnesota Department of Revenue to provide further direction on the use of CARES funding for regular police payroll and also indicated we may presume these regular payroll public safety expenses as being dedicated to a COVID-19 response; and WHEREAS, the City of Little Canada contracts with the Ramsey County Sheriff’s Department for police and public safety services. A portion of this contract are for payroll and benefit costs for the officers assigned to patrol activities, traffic enforcement activities, and crime prevention activities in the City of Little Canada. These duties are presumed to be sustainably dedicated to the COVID-19 health emergency. This modification of their operations, caused by the pandemic, was not accounted for in the city’s annual budget and was incurred between March 1 to November 15, 2020 and is therefore a reimbursable cost under the CARES Act. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, The City Council recognizes a portion of regular payroll expenses from March 1, 2020 to November 15, 2020, consistent with Federal and State direction, be deemed reimbursable due to the public health emergency related to COVID 19. Adopted this 28th day of October, 2020 by the City Council of the City of Little Canada.

By: ______John T. Keis, Mayor Attest: ______Chris Heineman, City Administrator

AYES: NAYS: Blank Blank Blank Blank Blank Blank Blank Blank Blank Blank Blank Blank New Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF) Categories Administrative Expenses Administrative costs directly associated with the administration of CRF funds Use of payments from the Fund to cover payroll or benefits expenses of public employees are limited to those employees whose work duties are substantially dedicated to mitigating or responding to the COVID‐ 19 public health emergency Budgeted Personnel and Services Diverted to a Substantially Different Payroll and benefit costs associated with public employees who could have been furloughed or otherwise Use laid off but who were instead repurposed to perform previously unbudgeted functions substantially dedicated to mitigating or responding to the COVID‐19 public health emergency are also covered

Payroll and benefit costs of educational support staff or faculty responsible for developing online learning capabilities necessary to continue educational instruction in response to COVID‐19‐related school closures Providing paid sick and paid family and medical leave to public employees to enable compliance with COVID‐ 19 public health precautions COVID‐19 Testing and Contact Tracing Costs providing COVID‐19 testing, including serological testing

Contact tracing

Expenditures related to a State, territorial, local, or Tribal government payroll support program. Economic Support (other than small Employment and training programs for employees that have been furloughed due to the public health business, housing, and food assistance) emergency, if the government determined that the costs of such employment and training programs would be necessary due to the public health emergency Expenses Associated with the Issuance Expenses Associated with the Issuance of Tax Anticipation Notes of Tax Anticipation Notes Facilitating Distance Learning Facilitate distance learning, including technological improvements, in connection with school closings to enable compliance with COVID‐19 precautions Food Programs Food delivery to residents, including, for example, senior citizens and other vulnerable populations, to enable compliance with COVID‐19 public health precautions Consumer grant program to prevent eviction and assist in preventing homelessness be considered an eligible expense due to COVID‐19 public health emergency Housing Support Program to assist individuals with payment of overdue rent or mortgage payments to avoid eviction or foreclosure or unforeseen financial costs for funerals and other emergency individual needs Improve Telework Capabilities of Improve telework capabilities for public employees to enable compliance with COVID‐19 public health Public Employees precautions COVID‐19‐related expenses of public hospitals, clinics, and similar facilities Establishing temporary public medical facilities and other measures to increase COVID‐19 treatment capacity, including related construction costs Medical Expenses Emergency medical response expenses, including emergency medical transportation, related to COVID‐19

Establishing and operating public telemedicine capabilities for COVID‐19 related treatment Nursing Home Assistance Direct payments or grants to nursing homes Payroll for Public Health and Safety Examples of types of covered employees, or classes of employees, include: Employees •Public Safety, Public Health, Health Care, Human Services •Similar employees whose services are substanally dedicated to migang or responding to the COVID‐19 public health emergency Personal Protective Equipment Acquisition and distribution of a. medical and protective supplies, including sanitizing products and personal protective equipment, for medical personnel, police officers, social workers, child protection services, and child welfare officers, direct service providers for older adults and individuals with disabilities in community settings, and other public health or safety workers connected to COVID‐19 public health emergency Disinfection of public areas and other facilities, e.g., nursing homes, in response to the COVID‐19 public health emergency Technical assistance to local authorities or other entities on mitigation of COVID‐19‐related threats to public health and safety Public safety measures undertaken in response to COVID‐19 Expenses for quarantining individuals Public Health Expenses Recovery planning projects or operating a recovery coordination office

Ongoing expenses from decommissioned equipment placed back into use or an unplanned lease renewal in order to respond to the public health emergency to the extent the expenses were previously unbudgeted and are otherwise consistent with section 601(d) of the Social Security Act outlined in the Guidance Maintaining state prisons and county jails, including as relates to sanitation and improvement of social distancing measures, to enable compliance with COVID‐19 public health precautions Care for homeless populations provided to mitigate COVID‐19 effects and enable compliance with COVID‐19 public health precautions Small Business Assistance Provision of grants to small businesses to reimburse the costs of business interruption caused by required closures Unemployment Benefits Unemployment insurance costs related to the COVID‐19 public health emergency if such costs will not be reimbursed by the federal government pursuant to the CARES Act or otherwise Workers' Compensation Increased workers compensation cost to the government due to the COVID‐19 public health emergency incurred during the covered period, is an eligible expense Items Not Listed Above ‐ to include Other COVID‐19‐related expenses reasonably necessary to the function of government that satisfy the other eligible expenses that are not Fund’s eligibility criteria and don't fit into any of the above categories. captured in the available expenditure categories Capital Improvement Plan 2021 - 2025

Little Canada , MN

DRAFT DOCUMENT 10-09-2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Pages

Introduction ...... 1-9

Funding Summary by Year ...... 11

Projects by Year 2021 Projects ...... 12-13 2022 Projects ...... 14-15 2023 Projects ...... 16 2024 Projects ...... 17 2025 Projects ...... 18

Projects by Type

Buildings except Fire Station Building Projects ...... 19 Administration Projects ...... 20 Fire Projects ...... 21 Parks and Recreation Projects ...... 22-23 Public Works Projects ...... 24-25 Streets Projects ...... 26 Map of 5-year Streets Projects ...... 27 Trails Projects ...... 28 Storm Projects ...... 29 Water and Sewer Projects ...... 30-31

Funding Summary by Fund

General Capital Improvement Fund (Fund 400) ...... 32 Infrastructure Capital Improvement Fund (Fund 450) ...... 33 Parkland Acquisition Fund (Fund 456) ...... 34 Fire Equipment Fund (Fund 457) ...... 35 10% Fund (Fund 408) ...... 36 Water/Sewer Replacement Fund (Fund 604) ...... 37

2021 Project Forms

2021 Project Forms ...... 38-54

DRAFT DOCUMENT 10-09-2020 CITY OF LITTLE CANADA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 2021-2025

INTRODUCTION The City of Little Canada utilizes a Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) to schedule proposed public improvements and purchases over a five-year period. Significant purchases and improvements beyond five years are included when the project and costs have been identified. The Plan matches proposed expenditures and revenues by project.

The CIP is a planning document intended to assist policy makers and staff to plan for major capital improvements, renewal, and replacement expenditures. As a planning document, the CIP does not bind the City to the anticipated expenditures in the projected years. The CIP is not a budget, nor is it an authorization to expend funds. The authorization of the expenditures occurs through City Council action and in the adoption of the annual budget. 2021 Projects will be included in the 2021 Budget that Council adopts in December. For projects beyond 2021, staff will request authorization from Council before proceeding with any expenditure.

As a planning document, the CIP facilitates two distinct planning purposes. First, the CIP is a tool that is used to implement the goals identified in the City’s Comprehensive Plan. As the City looks at future projects, it is important to make sure that they will appropriately integrate with the Comprehensive Plan. Second, the CIP is a financial planning document. The CIP is to be reviewed each year per the City’s Financial Policies. As capital expenditures are identified in various periods of time, it is important to appropriately plan so that the necessary funding is available when these expenditures take place.

In 2019, the City Council adopted a Strategic Plan. The first step in this Plan was to create a practical vision for the next 3-5 years. This vision has been used to prepare the CIP. Specific goals included in the practical vision are as follows: By 2025, Little Canada: • Has a defined town square plan • Has flexible gathering spaces that will engage everyone • Has increased, diversified citizen engagement • Has modernized codes & all records are incorporated into efficient, functional formats • Has sustainable core services that are accountable to the public • Has an enhanced internal and external trail system • Has provided additional park amenities and opportunities to engage the community • Has revitalized key commercial corridors • Is maintaining, and has created, new housing opportunities

From these practical goals, four strategic directions were identified to help achieve this vision: 1. Enhance and Empower the Community 2. Create Operational Efficiency 3. Maximize the City’s Assets to Catalyze Development 4. Mandate Action and Accountability

Every effort has been made to draft the document as conservatively and realistically as possible, while maintaining the integrity of the funds. The concept of the fund integrity includes accounting for project costs in the funds that have been designated for those costs to occur.

DRAFT DOCUMENT 10-09-2020 1 The CIP is summarized by the following sections: • Funding Summary by Year • Projects by Year • Projects by Type • Funding Summary by Fund • 2021 Project Forms

FUNDING SUMMARY BY YEAR (PAGE 11) This CIP covers the period form 2021-2025 and is organized by the funding sources of the improvement project. Over the next five years, $12.9 million in projects have been identified.

2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total $2,524,100 $4,203,350 $1,897,560 $2,111,610 $2,130,805 $12,867,425

2021-2025 Capital Improvement Projects by Type

$6,000,000 $5,539,860

$5,000,000

$4,000,000

$3,000,000 $2,379,515 $2,354,250

$2,000,000 $1,327,400 $883,250 $1,000,000 $308,150 $75,000 $- Buildings & Fire Parks & Public Street Storm Water & Admin Recreation Works Projects Projects Sewer (includes Equipment Projects trails)

Debt will not need to be issued to fund these projects since adequate funds from other sources have been identified. Electric and gas franchise fees is the largest funding source for these capital projects, followed by street project assessments, and water and sewer user fees. Property taxes make up 19% of the funding. These property taxes are levied for street projects ($122,200 per year) and future fire equipment ($160,000 per year).

2021-2025 Funding Sources Donations & Grants 2%

LGA Other 5% 10% Franchise fee 24%

Property Taxes 19% Assessments 20%

Utility User Fees 20%

DRAFT DOCUMENT 10-09-2020 2

PROJECTS BY YEAR (PAGES 12-18) A detailed listing of projects by year is located on pages 12-18. 2021 projects will be included in the 2021 Budget that will be adopted by Council in December. The 2022-2025 projects should be considered a planning tool, and the projects included for 2021 will serve as a work plan for staff.

PROJECTS BY TYPE (PAGES 19-31) Projects have been classified as: • Buildings (except the fire station) • Administration • Fire • Parks & Recreation • Public Works Equipment • Streets • Trails • Storm • Water and Sewer

2021 highlights by project type and significant future projects are as follows: Buildings (Page 19) Highlights of building improvements in the Capital Projects budget include:

• Upgrades at the City Center for $97,300. This includes windows, doors, efficiency upgrades and preliminary costs for staff bathroom upgrades. • Miscellaneous office furniture and reconfiguration of the front office space at the City Center (Preliminary estimate of $8,000)

Administration (Page 20) The City of Little Canada has traditionally required administrative employees to utilize their private vehicles for inspection activities. While employees are reimbursed for their mileage expenses, they are not readily identifiable as a City employee. This also creates additional liability issues when conducting official city business in a private vehicle. Staff is recommending that up to $23,000 be included in the 2021 Capital Projects budget for the purchase of a small all-wheel drive SUV. The vehicle would be used primarily for rental licensing and code enforcement inspections, but could also be utilized by other administrative staff for meetings or conferences when needed. This amount was included in the 2020 projects but not purchased, due the delay in the hiring of the Code Enforcement Officer.

Additional capital project expenditures in the Administration Department include standard computer and network switch upgrades ($12,450) and replacement phones ($5,000). The current phones will not be supported after 2021.

Fire (Page 21) Fire equipment has traditionally been funded by the General Capital Improvement Fund (400) and the Fire Equipment Fund (457). The City levies $160,000 in property taxes for fire equipment in the Fire Equipment Fund. There should be discussion whether all fire equipment purchases after 2021, should be included in the Fire Equipment Fund (457).

2021 fire equipment to be replaced include the fire radios ($192,000), and the 3rd Command Vehicle ($63,700). The other two Command Vehicles were replaced in 2019 and 2020. As has been done in the past, the reserve line ($40,200) is included in the 2021 capital as requested by the LCFD. These funds will onlyDRAFT be DOCUMENT utilized if 10-09-2020there is an unforeseen capital emergency.3 The aerial truck ($1,352,000) is proposed to be replaced in 2022. A committee from LCFD is currently meeting to determine appropriate the vehicle to be purchased based on the current and future needs of the department.

All large fire vehicles and equipment have been included in the plan due to the large replacement cost. If an item will not be replaced by 2025, the anticipated replacement costs are identified in the future column.

Parks & Recreation Department (Page 22-23) The Parks & Recreation Commission has continued to be involved in Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) planning. The Commission sets three priorities for the year, which helps staff work towards those goals. For 2020, the top priorities by the Parks & Recreation Commission were to complete the Gervais Mill entrance, to complete the Pioneer Park Master Plan process, and to complete the Spooner Park Lower Shelter. These projects were scheduled for 2020, but due to many factors including the pandemic, they have been moved to 2021 for completion and remain the top priorities of the Parks and Recreation Commission.

The Parks Master Plan is also being used as a guiding document to program Parks & Recreation capital projects. It should be noted that financial considerations were not a part of the Parks Master Plan. The plan is meant to guide future park decisions based on the input that was received during the planning process. As projects that were identified in the Parks Master Plan are added to the CIP, a plan for financing these projects will need to be developed.

Highlights of the 2021 projects are as follows:

• Gervais Mill Entrance - Upgrade and enhance the Gervais Mill Park Entrance (Noel Street side). The Parks & Recreation recommended a preliminary design in 2019, and it was bid in 2020. Due to the high cost of the bid, the project was moved to 2021. The project has increased from $51,750 to $110,000. • Spooner Park Lower Shelter – $75,000 for a new larger open-air shelter for rental to better serve the needs of the community. • Interpretive Signage – Add interpretive signage and wayfinding signage at each park throughout the park system. The signs will highlight the area that park users are in and give an overall view of the park system. This will give exposure to underutilized parks. It will also allow people new to the area to be made aware of other park offerings within the City. The anticipated price for design, materials, and installation is $20,000. This project was moved from 2020 to 2021. • Entrance signs at all parks – New minimum maintenance park entrance signs to replace the existing deteriorating signs for $33,250. • Consultant – $30,000 is included for a consultant for the Pioneer Park Master Planning process. Once the Pioneer Park Master Planning process is complete, park projects beyond 2021 may need to be postponed in order to concentrate on the Pioneer Park improvements.

General park maintenance projects scheduled for 2021 include:

• Trail repair and maintenance at Pioneer Park • New woodchips at the Nadeau Park playground • Continued work on buckthorn removal and general tree trimming primarily at Spooner Park but at other parks as needed

DRAFT DOCUMENT 10-09-2020 4 • Continued work on habitat restoration at Thunder Bay/Westwind Park following the Xcel clear cutting from 2018

Looking past 2021, some highlights of upcoming projects are:

• Boardwalk in Gervais Mill Park • Boardwalk/Pier at Nadeau Wildlife Park • Upgrade Band Shell at Spooner Park • Pioneer Park Playground equipment (transfer from Park Land Acquisition Fund 456) • Picnic shelter at Rondeau Park • Fitness Equipment in the Thunder Bay/Westwind Park (contingent on grant funding)

Public Works Equipment (Pages 24-25) Due to the large replacement cost for public works equipment, all major equipment has been included in the schedule. If a piece of equipment will not be replaced in the next five years, the anticipated replacement cost is identified in the future column.

Highlights of the 2021 Public Works Department equipment purchases are as follows:

The 2011 Ford F-250 is scheduled to be replaced in 2021. The truck has over 60,000 miles on it and is used for plowing cul-de-sacs in the winter. Plowing is hard on trucks, particularly the transmission. The truck was also involved in an accident back in 2012 and the back passenger quarter panel had to be replaced. The replacement panel is already rusting and it is not from a lack of proper care. Staff is not sure what the issue is. This truck serves as the utility truck and is in use each day for such work as locating sewer and water utilities, checking lift stations, meter replacement, and other day-to-day activities. The new truck will also have a plow, as it will serve as a plow truck on the east side of the City. The estimated cost of the new truck and plow is $50,000.

The 2011 GMC pickup will be replaced as well. This truck is used in parks maintenance and also will have a plow for plowing parking lots and trails and helping out with cul-de-sacs as needed. The current truck has 41,000 miles on it and also has hard use from plowing and off road travel in the parks. The plow had to be repaired last year and the truck has had some electrical problems in the past year. The estimated cost of the truck and plow is $48,000.

The 2013 Toolcat is scheduled to be replaced in 2021 for $56,000. The Toolcats are used all year for such activities as mowing boulevards, plowing sidewalks, maintaining off road areas, and hauling materials to difficult- to reach areas.

Small Equipment:

• Snowblower ($2,750): The 2001 Toro snowblower is scheduled to be replaced. It is used to blow sidewalks around City Hall and the Fire Station and around lift stations and other areas.

• Jumping Jack Compactor ($2,000): The jumping jack compactor is used to compact backfill in holes that are excavated.

The Public works Department will continue to follow the replacement schedule for identifying trucks and equipment to be considered for replacement. As in the past, once a truck or piece of equipment is identified, an analysis is completed to see if the item needs to be replaced per the replacement schedule or can be deferred to a future year. DRAFT DOCUMENT 10-09-2020 5 Street Projects (26-27) Street projects to be completed in 2021 include Greenbrier Circle, Old County Road C, and the South Owasso railroad crossing.

A map of the street projects for the next 5 years is included on Page 27.

Trail Improvements (Page 28) $7,500 is included in 2021 for the Trout Brook Regional Trail. It is intended to be used for match funding, if the County moves forward with exploring the trail. This is a County led project. In addition, $15,000 has been included to plan for future trail connections.

Storm Projects (Page 29) Pond cleanout has been included in the 2021 storm water projects. The pond that will be cleaned out is scheduled to be the Little Canada Road pond west of Veterans Memorial Park. The City will bid this project through a larger project with the Ramsey County Watershed District to realize cost savings on the project.

Water and Sewer Projects (Page 30-31) As part of the 2021 Street Project, slip lining is proposed to be completed in the street project area. $25,000 has been budgeted for this work. Nine new controllers are scheduled to be added to eight lift stations and the Booster Station to improve the ability of staff to communicate with the stations remotely, as well as increasing the amount of information/data staff receives from each station. This is estimated to cost $30,000. The pumps are scheduled to be replaced at the Woodlynn lift station in 2021 at a cost of $16,000. A portable vacuum unit is scheduled to be purchased in 2021 at a cost of $22,000. The unit can be mounted to a Toolcat or pickup and allow staff to reach manholes on easements and other areas that the Aquatech cannot get to. It is also easier to use for small jobs such as sucking out a catch basin or rain garden trap.

FUNDING SUMMARY BY FUNDS (Pages 32-37) The City accounts for capital projects in six Capital Project Funds. These funds are the General Capital Improvements Fund, the Infrastructure Capital Improvements Fund, the Fire Equipment Fund, the Park Land Acquisition Fund, the 10% Fund, and the Water/Sewer Replacement Fund. If a project that has been identified in the CIP is not completed, the unspent funds stay in the Fund. In addition, the City has several TIF Capital Project Funds. These TIF funds are currently budgeted on an annual basis per their respective TIF Plans and Development Agreements. Highlights of the six Capital Project Funds are as follows:

General Capital Improvement Fund (Page 32) Background The General Capital Improvement Fund was created to fund capital improvements and acquisition projects not accounted for in another Capital Project Fund. These improvements have been historically been building improvements, public works equipment, small fire equipment, and parks improvements. Typically the expenditures in this fund have included the purchase of tangible personal property (equipment) or facilities used in the City operations.

Sources of Funds The fund receives it revenues from many sources including Local Government Aid (LGA) and transfers from the General Fund and other funds. It appears to have been the past practice to budget one year of LGA to fund the capital projects in this fund for the next 5 years.

Fund Outlook With only one year of LGA ($347,503) budgeted, there are only sufficient funds to fund the improvements for the next three years (through 2023). If three years of LGA are added to the revenues, there are sufficient funds to fund the improvements identified in the next five years. Another option is to delay some of the 2021-2025 park projects that were identified in the Parks Master Plan beyond 2025. DRAFT DOCUMENT 10-09-2020 6 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Estimate Revenues $680,488 $445,503 $441,400 $45,500 $43,000 $34,800 Expenditures 872,334 1,096,370 897,680 320,740 437,350 248,160 Net inc./(dec.) in fund balance (191,846) (650,867) (456,280) (275,240) (394,350) (213,360)

Beginning Fund Balance 1,663,637 $1,471,791 $820,924 $364,644 $89,404 $(304,946) Ending Fund Balance $1,471,791 $820,924 $364,644 $89,404 $(304,946) $(518,306)

Infrastructure Capital Project Fund (Page 33) Background Street, trails, and storm sewer projects are funded with the Infrastructure Capital Project Fund that was established in 1995 as a way to systematically fund these infrastructure projects. Streets improvements in the next five years are identified on a map on Page 27. As in the past, these streets will be funded with a combination of the property tax levy and assessments assessed to the property owners in the project area.

Source of Funds The fund receives revenues from many sources including the franchise fee for electric and gas, property taxes, and special assessments.

Fund Outlook With a property tax levy of $122,200 per year, the fund will have sufficient funds for the infrastructure projects identified in the next five years. 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Estimate Revenues $2,531,327 $844,400 $811,200 $807,400 $805,000 $801,400 Expenditures 3,539,254 1,207,610 1,198,130 1,042,300 1,168,280 1,064,040 Net inc./(dec.) in fund balance (1,007,927) (363,210) (386,930) (234,900) (363,280) (262,640)

Beginning Fund Balance $3,474,818 $2,466,891 $2,103,681 $1,716,751 $1,481,551 $1,118,571 Ending Fund Balance $2,466,891 $2,103,681 $1,716,751 $1,481,851 $1,118,571 $855,931

Park Land Acquisition Fund (Page 34) Background The Park Land Acquisition Fund is used to account for park charge payments received from development. Per City Code 2101.060, the funds may only be used for the purposes of land acquisition, land development and capital outlay for parks, playgrounds, public open space, storm water holding pond areas, and debt retirement in connection with land previously acquired for such public purposes.

Source of Funds The park charge payments received during development is the primary source of revenue in the fund. The fee amount is identified in the City’s Fee Schedule.

Significant Highlights in Future Years Pioneer Park improvements are scheduled for 2022. A Master Plan of this park started in 2020 and will be completed in 2021.

Fund Outlook There are sufficient revenues to fund the improvements identified for the next five years. 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Estimate Revenues $18,000 $16,200 $16,100 $13,000 $11,800 $10,800 Expenditures 380 27,890 635,400 260,410 205,420 5,430 Net inc./(dec.) in fund balance 17,620 (11,690) (619,300) (247,410) (193,620) 5,370

Beginning Fund Balance $1,221,920 $1,239,540 $1,227,850 $608,550 $361,140 $167,520 Ending Fund Balance $1,239,540 $1,227,850 $608,550 $361,140 $167,520 $172,890

DRAFT DOCUMENT 10-09-2020 7 Fire Equipment Fund (Page 35) Background The Fire Equipment Fund was created in 2013 to accumulate funds for future fire apparatus purchases. The proposed property tax levy is at a constant level of funding of $160,000 for the next five years.

Source of Funds The property tax levy is main source of funding for this fund. In addition, the Little Canada Fire Department makes contributions to the Fire Equipment Fund.

Significant Highlights in Future Years The next significant fire equipment purchase is an aerial truck that is scheduled to be purchased in 2022. This truck will replace a 1992 Aerial. A committee of the LCFD was formed in 2020 to begin the process of identifying the specifications and process for this purchase.

Fund Summary With a property tax levy of $160,000 per year, the fund will have sufficient funds for the fire apparatus purchases in the next five years. 2020 Estimate 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Revenues $220,785 $172,600 $173,600 $161,900 $162,700 $164,300 Expenditures 61,484 63,700 1,352,000 80,560 - 623,805 Net inc./(dec.) in fund balance 159,301 108,900 (1,178,400) 81,340 162,700 (459,505)

Beginning Fund Balance $1,095,728 $1,255,029 $1,363,929 $185,529 $266,869 $429,569 Ending Fund Balance $1,255,029 $1,363,929 $185,529 $266,869 $429,569 $(29,936)

10% Fund (Page 36) Background The 10% Fund accounts for the amounts received and related to the City’s charitable gambling contributions. These funds may only be used for expenditures identified in Minnesota Statutes, section 349.12(7)(a).

Source of Funds The 10% Fund receives 10% of net profits derived from lawful gambling in the City as identified in the City Code 815.030 and as allowed by the State.

Fund Outlook The all-inclusive playground equipment at Spooner Park was funded with the 10% Fund in 2018 and 2019. Only operating expenditures (contribution to Canadian Days Fireworks) have been identified to be funded from this fund through 2025. There are sufficient revenues to fund the expenditures identified for the next five years. 2020 Estimate 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Revenues $22,600 $22,900 $23,000 $23,200 $23,300 $23,500 Expenditures - 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 Net inc./(dec.) in fund balance 22,600 15,400 15,500 15,700 15,800 16,000

Beginning Fund Balance $63,147 $85,747 $101,147 $116,647 $132,347 $148,147 Ending Fund Balance $85,747 $101,147 $116,647 $132,347 $148,147 $164,147

Water/Sewer Replacement Fund (Page 37) Background This fund is used to account for funds set aside from the City’s water and sewer operating utilities to be used for future equipment replacement and capital costs for the City’s utilities.

Source of Funds The Fund receives an annual operating transfer from the Water Enterprise Fund ($200,000) and Sewer Enterprise Fund ($100,000).

DRAFT DOCUMENT 10-09-2020 8 Fund Outlook The entire debt service payment for the public works facility is funded from this fund. This debt will not be retired until 2034. While there are sufficient revenues to fund the expenditures identified in this fund for the next five years, the fund will have less than $500,000 in reserves by 2030. A utility rate study is in progress to identify possible solutions. 2020 Estimate 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Revenues $360,888 $331,900 $331,900 $332,000 $329,300 $329,300 Debt Service Transfer Out 228,785 229,925 226,925 233,175 229,175 230,175 Expenditures 238,936 149,470 466,100 213,340 321,580 209,620 Net inc./(dec.) in fund balance (106,833) (47,495) (361,125) (114,515) (221,455) (110,495)

Beginning Fund Balance $2,033,768 $1,926,935 $1,879,440 $1,518,315 $1,403,800 $1,182,345 Ending Fund Balance $1,926,935 $1,879,440 $1,518,315 $1,403,800 $1,182,345 $1,071,850

CONCLUSION City staff has prepared this document in conjunction with those projects and capital items that are known and for which costs can be reasonably estimated. The CIP should be considered a planning tool and the projects included for 2021 and 2022 serve as a work plan for staff. 2021 projects will be included in the 2021 Budget that will be adopted by Council in December. For 2022 projects, staff will request authorization from Council before proceeding with a feasibility study, acquisition, or construction.

DRAFT DOCUMENT 10-09-2020 9 10 DRAFT DOCUMENT 10-09-2020 CITY OF LITTLE CANADA CAPITAL PROJECTS 2021-2025 FUNDING SUMMARY BY YEAR 2020 Est. 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Future

EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY PROJECT TYPE:

Buildings $ 82,852 $ 147,800 $ 53,000 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 11,000 Administration 34,880 41,700 10,100 15,850 15,450 15,250 - Fire 156,744 298,350 1,369,450 83,010 2,450 626,255 2,937,010 Parks & Recreation 441,685 489,650 652,400 135,400 261,900 7,400 140,000 Public Works 217,157 182,050 164,200 163,500 154,000 219,500 1,340,000 Streets 3,443,528 1,179,050 1,169,600 1,015,000 1,139,810 1,036,400 1,348,000 Trails - 27,500 60,000 10,000 205,000 5,000 180,000 Storm Projects 68,936 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 100,000 Park Land - - 250,000 250,000 - - - Water & Sewer Projects 232,536 143,000 459,600 206,800 315,000 203,000 - TOTAL EXPENDITURES 4,678,318$ 2,524,100$ $ 4,203,350 $ 1,897,560 $ 2,111,610 $ 2,130,805 $ 6,056,010

FUNDING SUMMARY:

General Capital Improve. Fund (400) $ 871,834 1,095,850$ $ 897,150 $ 320,200 $ 436, 800 $ 247, 600 Infrastructure Cap. Improve. Fund(450) 3,012,464 1,194,050 1,184,600 1,030,000 1,154,810 1,051,400 Park Land Acquisition Fund (456) - 27,500 310,000 260,000 205,000 5,000 Fire Equipment Fund (457) 61,484 63,700 1,352,000 80,560 - 623,805 Water/Sewer Replacement Fund (604) 232,536 143,000 459,600 206,800 315,000 203,000 TIF 3-2 500,000 - TOTAL EXPENDITURES 4,678,318$ 2,524,100$ $ 4,203,350 $ 1,897,560 $ 2,111,610 $ 2,130,805

DRAFT DOCUMENT 10-09-2020 11 CITY OF LITTLE CANADA CAPITAL PROJECTS 2021 Projects

Project Form Year Project Type Location Description Page # Cost Project Description 2021 Buildings City Center Windows & doors $ 50,000 2021 Buildings City Center Efficiency Upgrades 22,300 2021 Buildings City Center Landscaping and screening 7,500 2021 Buildings City Center Staff bathroom upgrade 25,000 2021 Buildings City Center Misc. office furniture 3,000 2021 Buildings City Center Front office space 5,000 2021 Buildings Old Fire Hall Roof 35,000 Will not replace until needed 2021 Administration Vehicle for code enforcement 23,000 2021 Administration Computers 6,450 Four year replacement schedule 2021 Administration Network switches 6,000 Four year replacement schedule 2021 Administration Council computer reimbursement 1,250 Each member receives up to $1,000 every 4 years 2021 Administration Phones 5,000 Current phones will no longer be supported 2021 Fire Radios 38 192,000 2021 Fire Building repairs 2,450 2021 Fire Reserve line 40,200 2021 Parks & Recreation Gervais Mill Entrance upgrades 39 110,000 Not completed in 2020; move to 2021 2021 Parks & Recreation Gervais Mill Entrance-east 3,500 2021 Parks & Recreation Nadeau Woodchip playground 3,500 2021 Parks & Recreation Spooner Park Buckthorn removal 7,400 2021 Parks & Recreation Spooner Park Lower Shelter 40 75,000 Not completed in 2020; move to 2021 2021 Parks & Recreation Pioneer Park Message center 2,000 Includes spot repair 2021 Parks & Recreation Pioneer Park Trail repair/maintenance 41 130,000 2021 Parks & Recreation Pioneer Park Soccer field repair/maintenance 42 50,000 2021 Parks & Recreation Thunder Bay Park Habitat restoration 43 25,000 2021 Parks & Recreation Other items Park & Recreation consultant 44 30,000 2021 Parks & Recreation Other items Entrance signs at all parks 45 33,250 2021 Parks & Recreation Other items Interpretive signage 46 20,000 2021 Public Works Equipment PW Truck with plow 47 50,000 Replace 2011 Ford F250 (unit 111) 2021 Public Works Equipment PW Truck 48 48,000 Replace 2011 GMC 2500 (unit 311) 2021 Public Works Equipment Toolcat with lift attachment 49 56,000 Replace 2013 Toolcat (unit 112) 2021 Public Works Equipment Mower 7 foot 12,500 Replace 2016 Toro-z-turn mower 2021 Public Works Equipment Snowblower 2,750 Replace 2001 Snowblower 2021 Public Works Equipment Field Drags 5,000 2021 Public Works Equipment Plow for toolcat 2,000 2021 Public Works Equipment Jumping jack compactor 2,000 2021 Public Works Equipment Enclosed trailer 3,800 Funded with General Capital Improvements (Fund 400) 1,095,850

12 DRAFT DOCUMENT 10-09-2020 CITY OF LITTLE CANADA CAPITAL PROJECTS 2021 Projects

Project Form Year Project Type Location Description Page # Cost Project Description 2021 Streets Greenbrier Circle (Cnty Rd B2 to end) 512,300 Reconstruction with new curb 2021 Streets Old Country Road C 631,750 Reconstruction with new curb 2021 Streets S Owasso RR Crossing 35,000 Partnership with RR/$35,000 is city portion 2021 Storm Pond cleanout 15,000 Funded with Infrastructure Capital Improvements (Fund 450) 1,194,050 2021 Trails Trout Brook Regional Trail 7,500 City Portion 2021 Park Land Plan for trail connections 15,000 2021 Park Land Appraisals for future trails 5,000 Funded with Park Land Acquisition (Fund 456) 27,500 2021 Fire Command vehicle 50 63,700 Funded with Fire Equipment Replacement Fund (Fund 457) 63,700 2021 Water/Sewer Vac unit 51 22,000 2021 Water/Sewer Lining sanitary 25,000 Slip lining 2021 Water/Sewer Misc. line repairs 52 40,000 2021 Water/Sewer Lift Station-Controller 53 30,000 2021 Water/Sewer Lift Station-Upgrades 10,000 2021 Water/Sewer Woodlyn Lift Station-Pumps 54 16,000 Funded with Water/Sewer Replacement Fund (Fund 604) 143,000 Total 2021 Projects 2,524,100$

13 DRAFT DOCUMENT 10-09-2020 CITY OF LITTLE CANADA CAPITAL PROJECTS 2022 Projects

Year Project Type Location Description Cost Project Description 2022 Buildings City Center Bathrooms $ 50,000 2022 Buildings City Center Misc. office furniture 3,000 2022 Administration Computers 6,750 Four year replacement schedule 2022 Administration Network switches 2,100 Four year replacement schedule 2022 Administration Council computer reimbursement 1,250 Each member receives up to $1,000 every 4 years 2022 Fire Emergency management radios 15,000 2022 Fire Building repairs 2,450 2022 Parks & Recreation Spooner Park Buckthorn removal 7,400 2022 Parks & Recreation Spooner Park Tree trimming 14,000 2022 Parks & Recreation Spooner Park Sports court resurfacing 7,500 2022 Parks & Recreation Spooner Park Stain shelters/structures 8,000 2022 Parks & Recreation Spooner Park Field repair maintenance 6,000 2022 Parks & Recreation Spooner Park Proposed expansion of parking lot 165,000 2022 Parks & Recreation Pioneer Park Field repair maintenance 6,000 2022 Parks & Recreation Pioneer Park Playground replacement 325,000 2022 Parks & Recreation Pioneer Park Sports court resurfacing 16,500 2022 Parks & Recreation Rondeau Park Basketball court resurfacing 3,500 Includes drain tile 2022 Parks & Recreation Thunder Bay Park Habitat restoration 15,000 2022 Parks & Recreation Thunder Bay Park Fitness equipment 65,000 Contingent on grant funding 2022 Parks & Recreation Thunder Bay Park Basketball court resurfacing 3,500 2022 Parks & Recreation Park & Recreation consultant 10,000 2022 Public Works Equipment PW Truck 52,000 Replace 2011 Ford F250 (unit 211) 2022 Public Works Equipment Skid loader 42,000 Replace 2012 Skid Loader (unit 212) 2022 Public Works Equipment Mower-large area 63,000 Replace 2016 Groundskeeper 2022 Public Works Equipment Cut-off Saw 14"" 1,200 2022 Public Works Equipment Pickup broom 3,500 2022 Public Works Equipment Generator - 3000 watt 2,500 Funded with General Capital Improvements (Fund 400) 897,150 2022 Streets Yorkton Ridge (Condit W to end) 244,800 Reclaim/Pave 2022 Streets Woodlyn Avenue 620,000 Reconstruction 2022 Streets Maple Lane 304,800 Reclaim/Pave 2022 Storm Pond cleanout 15,000 Funded with Infrastructure Capital Improvements (Fund 450) 1,184,600 2022 Trails Trout Brook Regional Trail 10,000 City Portion 2022 Trails Easement acquisition 30,000 For Powerline trail 2022 Trails Plan for trail connections 15,000

DRAFT DOCUMENT 10-09-2020 14 CITY OF LITTLE CANADA CAPITAL PROJECTS 2022 Projects

Year Project Type Location Description Cost Project Description 2022 Trails Appraisal future trails 5,000 2022 Trails Land and demolition of property 250,000 Funded with Park Land Acquisition (Fund 456) 310,000 2022 Fire Aerial truck 1,352,000 Replace 1992 truck Funded with Fire Equipment Replacement Fund (Fund 457) 1,352,000 2022 Water/Sewer Water meter gateway & software 8,000 2022 Water/Sewer Sewer machine hose 2,100 2022 Water/Sewer Rice Street valve repair 60,000 2022 Water/Sewer Force main-Dianna Lane 150,000 2022 Water/Sewer Manhole repairs 100,000 2022 Water/Sewer Paint hydrants 12,500 2022 Water/Sewer Lining sanitary 50,000 Slip lining 2022 Water/Sewer Misc. line repairs 50,000 2022 Water/Sewer Lift Station-Controller 17,000 2022 Water/Sewer Lift Station-Upgrades 10,000 Funded with Water/Sewer Replacement Fund (Fund 604) 459,600 Total 2022 Projects 4,203,350$

DRAFT DOCUMENT 10-09-2020 15 CITY OF LITTLE CANADA CAPITAL PROJECTS 2023 Projects

Year Project Type Location Description Cost Project Description 2023 Buildings City Center Misc. office furniture 3,000$ 2023 Administration Computers 7,100 Four year replacement schedule 2023 Administration Network switches 6,500 Four year replacement schedule 2023 Administration Council computer reimbursement 1,250 Each member receives up to $1,000 every 4 years 2023 Administration Phones 1,000 2023 Public Safety Building repairs 2,450 2023 Parks & Recreation Spooner Park Buckthorn removal 7,400 2023 Parks & Recreation Spooner Park Lower lot improvements 80,000 Identified in Park Master Plan 2023 Parks & Recreation Spooner Park Entrance sign 30,000 2023 Parks & Recreation Pioneer Park Warning track grading 8,000 2023 Parks & Recreation Park & Recreation consultant 10,000 2023 Public Works Equipment PW Truck 48,000 Replace 2013 Ford F350 (unit 113) 2023 Public Works Equipment Toolcat 57,000 Replace 2016 Toolcat 2023 Public Works Equipment Portable air compressor 18,000 Replace 2003 (unit 303) 2023 Public Works Equipment Wood chipper 35,000 Replace 2008 (unit 208) 2023 Public Works Equipment Silt seeder 5,500 Funded with General Capital Improvements (Fund 400) 320,200 2023 Streets Twin Lake Blvd. 715,000 Reclaim/Pavement-Partner w/ Vadnais Heights 2023 Streets County Road D (Greenbrier to Maple Leaf) 300,000 County Project-Est City Share 2023 Storm Pond cleanout 15,000 Funded with Infrastructure Capital Improvements (Fund 450) 1,030,000 2023 Trails Future Trail acquisition/appraisal 5,000 2023 Trails Waterworks trail connection 5,000 2023 Trails Land and demolition of property 250,000 Funded with Park Land Acquisition (Fund 456) 260,000 2023 Fire Grass rig/pickup 80,560 Replace 2009 grass rig/pickup Funded with Fire Equipment Replacement Fund (Fund 457) 80,560 2023 Water/Sewer Tablet for Truck 111 1,300 2023 Water/Sewer Force main-County Road B 50,000 2022 Water/Sewer Paint hydrants 12,500 2023 Water/Sewer Lining sanitary 50,000 Slip lining 2023 Water/Sewer Misc. line repairs 50,000 2023 Water/Sewer Water Tower-inspections 15,000 2023 Water/Sewer Lift Station-Controller 18,000 2023 Water/Sewer Lift Station-Upgrades 10,000 Funded with Water/Sewer Replacement Fund (Fund 604) 206,800 Total 2023DRAFT Projects DOCUMENT 10-09-2020 16 1,897,560$ CITY OF LITTLE CANADA CAPITAL PROJECTS 2024 Projects

Year Project Type Location Description Cost Project Description 2024 Buildings City Center Misc. office furniture $ 3,000 2024 Administration Computers & Network Switches 14,000 Four year replacement schedule 2024 Administration Council computer reimbursement 1,250 Each member receives up to $1,000 every 4 years 2024 Administration Phones 200 2024 Fire Building repairs 2,450 2024 Parks & Recreation Gervais Mill Boardwalk 75,000 Identified in Park Master Plan 2024 Parks & Recreation Nadeau Wildlife Park Benches 3,500 Identified in Park Master Plan 2024 Parks & Recreation Spooner Park Buckthorn removal 7,400 2024 Parks & Recreation Spooner Park Field repair maintenance 6,000 2024 Parks & Recreation Spooner Park Bank shell structure 100,000 Identified in Park Master Plan 2024 Parks & Recreation Spooner Park Stone steps to creek 60,000 Identified in Park Master Plan 2024 Parks & Recreation Park & Recreation consultant 10,000 2024 Public Works Equipment PW Truck 40,000 Replace 2014 Ford F150 (unit 114) 2024 Public Works Equipment Loader/backhoe 100,000 Replace 1990 Case (unit 190) 2024 Public Works Equipment Water Tank 4,000 2024 Public Works Equipment Bobcat Snowblower 6,500 2024 Public Works Equipment Speed board 3,500 Funded with General Capital Improvements (Fund 400) 436,800 2024 Streets Nadeau Rd. (Country Dr. to Condit) 149,410 Mill/Overlay 2024 Streets Country Drive (RR tracks to S Owasso) 568,400 Reclaim/Pave (Possible MSA project) 2024 Streets Yorkton Blvd. (S Owasso to end) 250,000 Reclaim/Pave 2024 Streets Yorkton Court 172,000 Reclaim/Pave 2024 Storm Pond cleanout 15,000 Funded with Infrastructure Capital Improvements (Fund 450) 1,154,810 2024 Trails Waterworks trail connection 200,000 South of OFH 2024 Trails Future Trail acquisition/appraisal 5,000 Funded with Park Land Acquisition (Fund 456) 205,000 2024 Water/Sewer Water meter gateway & software 8,000 2024 Water/Sewer Generator 100,000 2024 Water/Sewer Force main -LS 50,000 2024 Water/Sewer Lining sanitary 50,000 Slip lining 2024 Water/Sewer Misc. line repairs 50,000 2024 Water/Sewer Sunset Court Lift Station- pump 20,000 2024 Water/Sewer Lift Station-Controller 8,000 2024 Water/Sewer Lift Station-Upgrades 10,000 2024 Water/Sewer Keller Lift Station-Pumps 19,000 Funded with Water/Sewer Replacement Fund (Fund 604) 315,000 Total 2024 Projects 2,111,610$ DRAFT DOCUMENT 10-09-2020 17 CITY OF LITTLE CANADA CAPITAL PROJECTS 2025 Projects

Year Project Type Location Description Cost Project Description 2025 Buildings City Center Misc. office furniture $ 3,000 2025 Administration Computers 8,000 Four year replacement schedule 2025 Administration Network switches 6,000 Four year replacement schedule 2025 Administration Council computer reimbursement 1,250 Each member receives up to $1,000 every 4 years 2025 Fire Building repairs 2,450 2025 Parks & Recreation Spooner Park Buckthorn removal 7,400 2025 Public Works Equipment Toolcat 58,000 Replace 2019 Toolcat(unit 319) 2025 Public Works Equipment Front end loader 130,000 Replace 2010 Caterpillar (unit 110) 2025 Public Works Equipment Pothole patcher 25,000 Replace 2015 tow-behind (unit 215) 2025 Public Works Equipment Snowblower 4,500 2025 Public Works Equipment Concrete mixer 2,000 Funded with General Capital Improvements (Fund 400) 247,600 2025 Streets Sunrise Drive (2nd phase to end) 71,400 Reclaim/Pave 2025 Streets Country Drive (So Owasso to LC Road) 630,000 Reclaim/Pave 2025 Streets Stoneridge Court 175,000 Reclaim/Pave 2025 Streets Sunset Court 160,000 Reclaim/Pave 2025 Storm Pond cleanout 15,000 Funded with Infrastructure Capital Improvements (Fund 450) 1,051,400 2025 Trails Future Trail acquisition/appraisal 5,000 Funded with Park Land Acquisition (Fund 456) 5,000 2025 Fire Rescue/utility vehicle 623,805 Funded with Fire Equipment Replacement Fund (Fund 457) 623,805 2025 Water/Sewer Generator 45,000 200 kw generator to replace 2000 model 2025 Water/Sewer Lining sanitary 50,000 Slip lining 2025 Water/Sewer Misc. line repairs 50,000 2025 Water/Sewer Booster Station Pump 21,000 2025 Water/Sewer Booster Station Roof 8,000 2025 Water/Sewer Lift station upgrades 10,000 2025 Water/Sewer Dianna Lane lift station 19,000 Funded with Water/Sewer Replacement Fund (Fund 604) 203,000 Total 2025 Projects $ 2,130,805

DRAFT DOCUMENT 10-09-2020 18 CITY OF LITTLE CANADA CAPITAL PROJECTS 2021-2025 PROJECTS BY TYPE BUILDINGS EXCEPT PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING

Buildings 2019 Actual 2020 Revised 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Future Project Description City Center Siding $ - $ 35,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Windows and doors 50,000 Efficiency upgrades 32,700 22,300 Furnaces/bathrooms Landscaping & screening - 7,500 Bathrooms 25,000 50,000 Misc office furniture 2,700 2,652 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 Front office space - 2,500 5,000 Total City Center 2,700 72,852 112,800 53,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 -

Old Fire Hall Exterior Renovations 4,769 Roof 35,000 Will not replace until needed Garage Doors 11,000 Replace garage doors Total Old Fire Hall 4,769 - 35,000 - - - - 11,000

Public Works Building Cover for mix - 10,000 Ceiling fans Total Public Works Building - 10,000 ------

Total Buildings $ 7,469 $ 82,852 $ 147,800 $ 53,000 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 11,000

Funding Gen. Cap. Improve. Fund(400) $ 7,469 $ 82,852 $ 147,800 $ 53,000 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 11,000

Total Funding $ 7,469 $ 82,852 $ 147,800 $ 53,000 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 11,000

DRAFT DOCUMENT 10-09-2020 19 CITY OF LITTLE CANADA CAPITAL PROJECTS 2021-2025 PROJECTS BY TYPE ADMINISTRATION

Administration 2020 Revised 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Future Project Description Automobiles Vehicle $ - $ 23,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Primarily for code enforcement Total Automobiles - 23,000 - - - - -

Office Equipment Computers 8,020 6,450 6,750 7,100 8,000 8,000 Four year replacement schedule Switches 5,610 6,000 2,100 6,500 6,000 6,000 Council computer reimb. 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 Each member receives up to $1,000 every 4 yrs Copier at City Center 15,000 With scanning capability Phones 5,000 1,000 200 Curr. phones will no longer be supported after '21 Copier at Public Works 5,000 Total Office Equipment 34,880 18,700 10,100 15,850 15,450 15,250 -

Total Administration $ 34,880 $ 41,700 $ 10,100 $ 15,850 $ 15,450 $ 15,250 $ -

Funding Gen. Cap. Improve. Fund(400) $ 34,880 $ 41,700 $ 10,100 $ 15,850 $ 15,450 $ 15,250 $ -

Total Funding $ 34,880 $ 41,700 $ 10,100 $ 15,850 $ 15,450 $ 15,250 $ -

DRAFT DOCUMENT 10-09-2020 20 CITY OF LITTLE CANADA CAPITAL PROJECTS 2021-2025 PROJECTS BY PROJECT TYPE FIRE EQUIPMENT, VEHICLES, AND BUILDINGS

Fire Equipment 2020 Est. 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Future Project Description Equipment SCBA's $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Computer hardware Radios 192,000 Pressure washer system Emergency Manage. Radios 15,000 Total Equipment - 192,000 15,000 - - - -

Vehicles Aerial Truck $ - $ - 1,352,000$ $ - $ - $ - $ - Replace 1992 truck Grass rig/pickup 80,560 2023-Replace 2009 grass rig/pickup Rescue/Utility 623,805 2025-Replace 2000 rescue/utility Command vehicles 61,484 63,700 228,100 2026-28-Replace 2019(1) and 2020(2) veh. Pumper 988,260 2028-Replace 2006 pumper Pumper 1,718,200 2040-Replace 2018 pumper Total Vehicles 61,484 63,700 1,352,000 80,560 - 623,805 2,934,560

Fire Station Building repairs 24,950 2,450 2,450 2,450 2,450 2,450 2,450 Masonry repairs in 2020 Roof inspection Fencing Flooring Apparatus Bay & Doors City portion of FS remodel FD portion of FS remodel Turnout lockers Reserve line 41,910 40,200 HVAC/air conditioners 28,400 Carryforward until replacement needed Total Fire Station 95,260 42,650 2,450 2,450 2,450 2,450 2,450

Total Fire Equipment $ 156,744 $ 298,350 1,369,450$ $ 83,010 $ 2,450 $ 626,255 2,937,010$

Funding Gen. Cap. Improve. Fund(400) $ 95,260 $ 234,650 $ 17,450 $ 2,450 $ 2,450 $ 2,450 $ 2,450 Fire Equip. Replacement (457) $ 61,484 $ 63,700 1,352,000$ $ 80,560 $ - $ 623,805 2,934,560$ Fire Department Reimb.

Total Funding $ 156,744 $ 298,350 1,369,450$ $ 83,010 $ 2,450 $ 626,255 2,937,010$

DRAFT DOCUMENT 10-09-2020 21 CITY OF LITTLE CANADA CAPITAL PROJECTS 2021-2025 PROJECTS BY TYPE PARKS AND RECREATION

Parks & Recreation 2020 Revised 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Future Project Description OFH Park Caulk Concrete $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Rink boards 100,400 (1) *LCRA Donation Skate park equipment 55,000 (1) *LCRA Donation Total OFH Park 100,400 - - - - - 55,000

Gervais Mill Trail repair/maintenance 5,000 Boardwalk 75,000 Identified in Park Master Plan Gervais Mill entrance 7,830 110,000 moved from 2020 & value increased Gervais Mill entrance-east 3,500 New addition Total Gervais Mill 12,830 113,500 - - 75,000 - -

Nadeau Wildlife Park Benches 3,500 Identified in Park Master Plan Boardwalk/Pier 35,000 Identified in Park Master Plan Woodchip Playground 3,500 New addition Total Nadeau Wildlife Park - 3,500 - - 3,500 - 35,000

Spooner Park Park renovations & playground Buckthorn removal 7,400 7,400 7,400 7,400 7,400 7,400 Added back into Cap. Improve. Fund Trail repair/maintenance 100,000 Tree trimming 10,000 14,000 Lower shelter 75,000 Identified in Park Master Plan Gilbertson field scoreboard 10,300 (1) * LCRA Donation Volleyball court - Lower lot improvements 80,000 Identified in Park Master Plan Sports court resurfacing 7,500 Stain shelters/structures 8,000 Field repair maintenance 6,000 6,000 Band shell structure 100,000 Identified in Park Master Plan Stone steps to Creek 60,000 Identified in Park Master Plan Proposed expansion of parking lot 165,000 $78,000 in Canadian Days donations Entrance sign 30,000 Total Spooner Park 127,700 82,400 207,900 117,400 173,400 7,400 -

Pioneer Park Bulb replacement contract Message center 2,000 Not Completed in 2020; move to 2021 Outfield fencing - field 2 12,000 Includes spot repair Field repair maintenance 6,000 6,000 Trail repair/maintenance 130,000 Soccer field repair/maint. 50,000

DRAFT DOCUMENT 10-09-2020 22 CITY OF LITTLE CANADA CAPITAL PROJECTS 2021-2025 PROJECTS BY TYPE PARKS AND RECREATION

Parks & Recreation 2020 Revised 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Future Project Description Pioneer Park (continued) Playground equipment 325,000 Moved from 2021 to 2022 Sports court resurfacing 16,500 Warning track grading 8,000 Total Pioneer Park 18,000 182,000 347,500 8,000 - - -

Rondeau Park Woodchip playground 3,500 Trail repair/maintenance 10,000 Picnic Shelter 40,000 Identified in Park Master Plan Basketball court resurfacing 3,500 Includes drain tile Total Rondeau Park 13,500 - 3,500 - - - 40,000

Thunder Bay Park Woodchip playground 2,000 Habitat restoration 25,000 25,000 15,000 Trail repair/maintenance 25,000 Fitness Equipment 65,000 (2) Contingent on grant funding Basketball court resurfacing 3,500 Total Thunder Bay Park 52,000 25,000 83,500 - - - -

Other Items Park & Rec. Consultant 5,000 30,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Entrance Signs at all parks 33,250 New addition Firefighters Historical Trail Sign 12,500 Moved from 2019 Firefighters Memorial 99,755 Funded by LCFD Interpretive Signage 20,000 Moved from 2019 Total Other Items 117,255 83,250 10,000 10,000 10,000 - 10,000

Total Parks and Recreation $ 441,685 $ 489,650 $ 652,400 $ 135,400 $ 261,900 $ 7,400 $ 140,000

Funding Donations-LCRA $ 110,700 (1) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 55,000 (1) Donations-Canadian Days ------Reimbursed by LCFD 99,755 Park Land Acquisition (456) - - 325,000 - - - - Gen. Cap. Improve. Fund(400) - - 65,000 80,000 238,500 - 40,000 Identified in Park Master Plan Gen. Cap. Improve. Fund(400) 330,985 489,650 262,400 55,400 23,400 7,400 45,000 Total Funding $ 541,440 $ 489,650 $ 652,400 $ 135,400 $ 261,900 $ 7,400 $ 140,000

(1) Donations LCRA (2) Contingent on grant funding

DRAFT DOCUMENT 10-09-2020 23 CITY OF LITTLE CANADA CAPITAL PROJECTS 2021-2025 PROJECTS BY TYPE PUBLIC WORKS

Public Works Equipment Useful Life 2019 Actual 2020 Revised 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Future Project Description Trucks PW Truck 10 $ 51,542 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 5 5,000 2019 Ford F350 (unit 119) PW Truck with plow 10 50,000 Replace 2011 Ford F250 (unit 111) PW Truck 10 52,000 Replace 2011 Ford F250 (unit 211) PW Truck 10 48,000 Replace 2011 GMC 2500 (unit 311) PW Truck 10 48,000 Replace 2013 Ford F350 (unit 113) PW Truck 10 40,000 Replace 2014 Ford F150 (unit 114) PW Truck 10 45,000 2016 Ford F350 w/plow (unit 116) Total Trucks 51,542 - 9 8,000 5 2,000 4 8,000 4 0,000 - 100,000

Large Trucks Dump Truck 15 194,650 Replace 2006 Single Axle (unit 105) Dump Truck 15 200,000 2015 Single Axle (unit 115) Small dump truck 15 62,728 2019 Ford F450 (unit 219) Utility Truck w/crane 10 105,000 2016 Ford F450 w/crane (unit 216) Combo Sewer Machine 15 450,000 2019 International (unit 419) Street Sweeper 10 250,000 2016 Street Sweeper (unit 416) Total Large Trucks 62,728 194,650 - - - - - 1,005,000

Large Equipment Tractor w/flail mower 15 85,000 2017 John Deere (unit 217) Toolcat 6 43,420 5 8,000 2019 Toolcat (unit 319) Toolcat w/lift attachment 6 56,000 Replace 2013 Toolcat (unit 112) Toolcat 6 57,000 Replace 2016 Toolcat Front end loader 15-20 130,000 2010 Caterpillar (unit 110) Loader/Backhoe 20 100,000 Replace 1990 Case (unit 190) Skid loader 10 42,000 Replace 2012 Skid Loader (unit 212) Asphalt roller 20 20,000 2008 roller (unit 108) Pothole patcher 10 25,000 2015 tow-behind pothole patcher (unit 215) Wood chipper 15 35,000 Replace 2008 (unit 208) Portable air compressor 20 18,000 Replace 2003 (unit 303) Mower with rink sweeper 15 50,000 2006 Jacobson mower Mower-Large area 5 63,000 Replace 2016 Groundsmaster Workman with hard cab 10 40,000 2018 Workman with groomer Truckster 15 22,000 2006 Cushman Mower -7 foot 5 12,500 Replace 2016 Toro z-turn mower Mower -7 foot 5 18,000 2014 Bobcat z-turn mower Total Large Equipment 43,420 - 6 8,500 105,000 110,000 100,000 213,000 235,000 Other Equipment Ball field painter 4,995 Generator rehab. 10,000 Rehab. '00 200 kW Generator(unit 600) Plate packer 1,907 LELY spreader 5,000 Scissor lift 5,600 This will be a used piece of equipment Snowblower 2,750 Replace 2001 Snowblower Field Drags 5,000 Plow for Toolcat 2,000 Other equipment (continued) Jumping jack compactor 2,000 DRAFT DOCUMENT 10-09-2020 24 CITY OF LITTLE CANADA CAPITAL PROJECTS 2021-2025 PROJECTS BY TYPE PUBLIC WORKS

Public Works Equipment Useful Life 2019 Actual 2020 Revised 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Future Project Description Enclosed trailer 3,800 Cut-off Saw 14"" 1,200 Pickup broom 3,500 Generator - 3000 watt 2,500 Slit seeder 5,500 Water Tank 4,000 Bobcat Snowblower 6,500 Speed board 3,500 Snowblower 4,500 Concrete mixer 2,000 Total Other Equipment 4,995 22,507 1 5,550 7,200 5,500 1 4,000 6,500 -

Total Public Works Equipment $ 162,685 $ 217,157 $ 182,050 $ 164,200 $ 163,500 $ 154,000 $ 219,500 1 ,340,000$

Funding Sales of existing equipment $ 34,500 $ 40,750 $ 40,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Gen. Cap. Improve. Fund(400) 128,185 176,407 142,050 164,200 163,500 154,000 219,500 1,340,000 Total Funding $ 162,685 $ 217,157 $ 182,050 $ 164,200 $ 163,500 $ 154,000 $ 219,500 1 ,340,000$

DRAFT DOCUMENT 10-09-2020 25 CITY OF LITTLE CANADA CAPITAL PROJECTS 2021-2025 PROJECTS BY PROJECT TYPE STREETS

Street Projects 2020 Revised 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Future Project Description Street Improvements Greenbrier Street (Labore to D) 1,709,159$ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Reconstruction County Road D (Payne to Greenbrier) 134,829 Reconstruction LC Road Pavers & Structure Repairs 648,551 Allen Avenue 702,063 Reclaim/Pave Allen Avenue Sidewalk 213,926 Funded with CDBG Grant Demont Avenue RR Crossing 35,000 Nadeau Rd. (Country Dr. to Condit) 149,410 Reclamation and spot curb Greenbrier Circle (Cnty Rd B2 to end) 512,300 Reconstruction with new curb Old Country Road C 631,750 Reconstruction with new curb S Owasso RR Crossing 35,000 Partnership with railroad. $35k is City portion Yorkton Ridge (Condit W to end) 244,800 Reclaim/Pave Woodlyn Avenue 620,000 Reconstruction Maple Lane 304,800 Reclaim/Pave Twin Lake Blvd. 715,000 Reclaim/Pavement-Partner w/ Vadnais Heights County Road D (Greenbrier to Maple Leaf) 300,000 County Project-Est City Share Country Drive (RR tracks to S Owasso) 568,400 Reclaim/Pave (Possible MSA project) Yorkton Blvd. (S Owasso to end) 250,000 Reclaim/Pave Yorkton Court 172,000 Reclaim/Pave Sunrise Drive (2nd phase to end) 71,400 Reclaim/Pave Country Drive (So Owasso to LC Road) 630,000 Reclaim/Pave Stoneridge Court 175,000 Reclaim/Pave Sunset Court 160,000 Reclaim/Pave

Total Street Improvements 3,443,528 1,179,050 1,169,600 1,015,000 1,139,810 1,036,400 -

Future Street Improvements Rice St (Cnty Rd B2 to Mkt Place Drive) 663,000 County Project - Est City Share Country Drive/South Owasso Trail 200,000 Rice St. sidewalk 25,000 By US Bank & Hardware Store Jackson Street (Cnty Road B2 to S end) 150,000 Reconstruction Australian Lakeshore East to end 310,000 Reconstruction-no public water Total Future Street Improvements ------1,348,000

Total All Street Projects 3,443,528$ 1,179,050$ 1,169,600$ 1,015,000$ 1,139,810$ 1,036,400$ 1,348,000$

Funding Infrastructure Fund (450) 2,513,028$ $ 904,550 $ 869,600 $ 715,000 $ 839,810 $ 736,400 1,348,000$ TIF 3-2 for paver project 500,000 Assessments 430,500 274,500 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 Total Funding 3,443,528$ 1,179,050$ 1,169,600$ 1,015,000$ 1,139,810$ 1,036,400$ 1,348,000$

DRAFT DOCUMENT 10-09-2020 26 5 Year Plan Capital Projects 2021-2025 City of Little Canada, MN October 2020

GVWX49 ST99 %&'(35E GVWX16 GVWX59

V a d n a i s

ard GVWX18 ulev H e i g h t s Twin Lake Bo %&'(35

Tw in L

S h o r e v i e w a ke Trail %&'(694

Ryan Drive

e n

A

a l e L County Road oodlynn %&'( s c W 494 ir S Ryan D East pen C p venue r A u c e

S e

v rive

t i D r Windrow e r

e CourtStoneridge

t D

e Greenbrier Street Greenbrier l rive Thunder Bay Road Bay Thunder d D c Westwin South Owasso Sou Big Ci r th Owasso C o 19 Allen Avenue u GVWX

Boulevard West Boule n

Yorkton vard East t

Boulevard r Payne Avenue Payne d

y e

a

D n

o Arcade Street Arcade Yorkton a

r R

i kton L r v

Yo Lane Valento e

e

a l

l

t i

Court Road Ontario

s v

Condit Street Condit Labore Road

ge r

Maple Lane R id o Street Vanderbie

e t C

Nadeau n Desoto Street Desoto Market Plac e e C D Road

r

i v )*10 e GVWX22 y a w M a p l e w o o d rk Pa Jackson Street Jackson r Eli Road e ll

e 27 %&'(35E K t Eas C Drive Noel Iona Lane ad o Street Edgerton R ty n e

u v o i C 21 r

GVWX D d Cou y Lit Ol nt tle y Canada Road East t GVWX23 t GVWX23 Road C Schl e

P e a n

r a k GVWX58 a L l S r Ca t

r Sylvan Street Sylvan Rose Lane

e

Ruth Street Ruth Stark Street Stark

e

t

et Little Canada Demont Avenue East e r C t Sunset

S a Savage Lane Savage

n

y

a

m b Court

e

R o s e v i l l e u n r e y

D m

c Morrison Avenue Morrison r D

i ia v M n G n

e aL Drive r a C

e Sunrise

n

e i

e r n County Road B2 West County Road B2 East c

b

l

e

78 r

GVWX L i

e

i

r l l a e W y h re Pr t e e u se i a rve ?@A P N Cou 36 Rice Street Rice la rt z

a t

s a Viking Drive E

est Viking Drive W GVWX25

?@A36 North Street Rice GVWX25 County Road B West County Road B East Legend I!

2021 2024 North Street Sloan

2022 2025

2023 CityLimits

0 2,000 Feet Source: Ramsey County, MnDOT, Nearmap Imagery 27 DRAFT DOCUMENT 10-09-2020 )*61 Map Document: \\arcserver1\GIS\LTCANADA_CI_MN\_Basemap\ESRI\Maps\2020\LTCANADA_5YearPlan_8x11P.mxd | Date Saved: 10/8/2020| PM Date Saved: 4:03:22 Document: \\arcserver1\GIS\LTCANADA_CI_MN\_Basemap\ESRI\Maps\2020\LTCANADA_5YearPlan_8x11P.mxd Map CITY OF LITTLE CANADA CAPITAL PROJECTS 2021-2025 PROJECTS BY PROJECT TYPE TRAILS

Trails 2020 Est. 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Future Project Description

Trail Improvements Trout Brook Regional Trail $ - $ 7,500 $ 10,000 $ 5,000 $ - $ - $ - Plan for future trails 15,000 15,000 Future Trail acquisition/appraisal 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 30,000 Easement Acquisition 30,000 Powerline trail Waterworks Trail Connection 200,000 South of OFH Future Powerline Trail develop. 150,000 Edgerton/Pioneer/Allen Total Trail Improvements $ - $ 27,500 $ 60,000 $ 10,000 $ 205,000 $ 5,000 $ 180,000

Total All Trail Projects $ - $ 27,500 $ 60,000 $ 10,000 $ 205,000 $ 5,000 $ 180,000

Funding Infrastructure Fund (450) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Park land Acquisition Fund (456) 27,500 60,000 10,000 205,000 5,000 180,000 Total Funding $ - $ 27,500 $ 60,000 $ 10,000 $ 205,000 $ 5,000 $ 180,000

DRAFT DOCUMENT 10-09-2020 28 CITY OF LITTLE CANADA CAPITAL PROJECTS 2021-2025 PROJECTS BY PROJECT TYPE STORM PROJECTS

Storm Projects 2019 Actual 2020 Est. 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Future Project Description Storm Projects Ryan Lane $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100, 000 Pond cleanout - 7,602 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 - Windrow Storm Project 5,971 60,000 Morrisson Swale 12,811 1,334 B2 Storm Sewer 73,000 Emergency Repairs Total Storm Projects $ 91,782 $ 68,936 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 100,000

Funding Infrastructure Fund (450) $ 91,782 $ 68,936 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 100,000

Total Funding $ 91,782 $ 68,936 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 100,000

DRAFT DOCUMENT 10-09-2020 29 CITY OF LITTLE CANADA CAPITAL PROJECTS 2021-2025 WATER/SEWER EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EXPENDITURE DETAIL (FUND 604) 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Description

ADMINISTRATION DETAIL

Audit $ 1,400 $ 1,470 $ 1,500 $ 1,540 $ 1,580 $ 1,620 Administration Fees ------Water meter gateway & software 10,500 - 8,000 - 8,000 - Land resale/purchase costs ------Transfer Out ------TOTAL ADMINISTRATION $ 11,900 $ 1,470 $ 9,500 $ 1,540 $ 9,580 $ 1,620

EQUIPMENT DETAIL

Generator - - - - 100,000 - Generator - - - - - 45,000 200 KW Generator to replace 2000 model Sewer camera ------Tablet for Truck 111 1,049 - - 1,300 - - GPS Device 9,000 - - - - - Gas Monitor ------Hydrant Buddy 8,500 - - - - - Combination sewer machine ------Vac unit 22,000 Sewer machine hose - - 2,100 - - - Gate valve operator ------TOTAL EQUIPMENT $ 18,549 $ 22,000 $ 2,100 $ 1,300 $ 100,000 $ 45,000

TOTAL ADMIN. & EQUIPMENT DETAIL $ 30,449 $ 23,470 $ 11,600 $ 2,840 $ 109,580 $ 46,620

DRAFT DOCUMENT 10-09-2020 30 CITY OF LITTLE CANADA CAPITAL PROJECTS 2021-2025 WATER/SEWER EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EXPENDITURE DETAIL (FUND 604) 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025

LINES DETAIL Description

Rice Street valve repair $ - $ - $ 60,000 $ - $ - $ - Not completed 2020; move to 2022 Force main-Keller ------Force main-Dianna Lane - - 150,000 - - - Force main-County Road B - - - 50,000 - - Force main-LS - - - - 50,000 - Manhole repairs - - 100,000 - - - Paint hydrants 4,750 - 12,500 12,500 - - Lining sanitary (slip lining) 132,360 25,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Misc. water line repairs 34,000 40,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 TOTAL LINES $ 171,110 $ 65,000 $ 422,500 $ 162,500 $ 150,000 $ 100,000

FACILITIES DETAIL

Water Tower inspections - - - 15,000 - - PW Bldg. equip/maint 5,000 5,000 5, 000 5,000 5,000 5,000 PW Bldg. solar panels ------Sunset court-lift station pump 3,335 - - - 20,000 - Booster Station-Pump #1 ------Booster Station-Pump #2 - - - - - 21,000 Booster Station-Pump #3 ------Booster Station-Roof - - - - - 8,000 Lift Station-Controller 8,000 30,000 17,000 18,000 8,000 - Lift station upgrades 2,146 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Dianna Lane Lift Station 3,333 - - - - 19,000 Maple Leaf Court Lift Station-Pumps 15,563 - - - - - Jessica Lift Station - - - - - County Road B Lift Station - - - - - County Road B2 Lift Station - - - - - Woodlynn Lift Station-Pumps - 16,000 - - - - Keller Lift Station-Pumps - - - - 19,000 - TOTAL FACILITIES $ 37,377 $ 61,000 $ 32,000 $ 48,000 $ 62,000 $ 63,000

TOTAL LINES & FACILITIES DETAIL $ 208,487 $ 126,000 $ 454,500 $ 210,500 $ 212,000 $ 163,000

DRAFT DOCUMENT 10-09-2020 31 CITY OF LITTLE CANADA CAPITAL PROJECTS 2021-2025 GENERAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND SUMMARY (FUND 400)

2019 Actual 2020 Revised 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Future REVENUE SUMMARY:

PILOT Payment (Painter's Union) (1) $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ - $ - PILOT Payment (AFSA) (2) - 13,980 13,300 13,300 13,300 13,300 13,300 TIF Excess Increment 28,027 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Donations 157,845 110,700 - - - - - 55,000 Sale of Equipment 34,500 40,750 40,000 - - - - Grant for Fitness Equipment - - - 65,000 - - - Local Government Aid 347,503 347,503 347,503 - - - - LCFD Reimbursement 151,409 99,755 - - - - - Transfer from 450 for Admin Fees 4,094 23,300 10,000 9,900 8,600 9,700 11,500 11,500 Transfer from 10% Fund for Salaries ------Transfer from 10% Fund for Spooner 31,401 ------Transfer from Park Land Acq. Fund - - - 325,000 - - - Interest 51,682 24,500 14,700 8,200 3,600 - - TOTAL REVENUE $ 816,461 $ 680,488 $ 445,503 $ 441,400 $ 45,500 $ 43,000 $ 34,800 $ 66,500

EXPENDITURE SUMMARY:

Audit Fees $ 500 $ 500 $ 520 $ 530 $ 540 $ 550 $ 560 $ - City Survey ------Comprehensive Plan ------Public Works Crew 5,587 ------Buildings (Detail on page 19) 7,469 82,852 147,800 53,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 11,000 Administration (Detail on page 20) 7,314 34,880 41,700 10,100 15,850 15,450 15,250 - Fire (Detail on page 21) 491,517 95,260 234,650 17,450 2,450 2,450 2,450 2,450 Parks & Recreation (Detail on pg 22-23) 379,005 441,685 489,650 652,400 135,400 261,900 7,400 140,000 Public Works (Detail on page 24-25) 162,685 217,157 182,050 164,200 163,500 154,000 219,500 1,340,000 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 1,054,077 $ 872,334 $ 1,096,370 $ 897,680 $ 3 20,740 $ 437,350 $ 248,160 $ 1,493,450

NET INCREASE (DECREASE) $ (237,616) $ (191,846) $ ( 650,867) $ (456,280) $ (275,240) $ (394,350) $ (213,360) $ (1,426,950)

BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $ 1,901,253 $ 1,663,637 $ 1,471,791 $ 820,924 $ 3 64,644 $ 89,404 $ (304,946) $ (304,946) ENDING FUND BALANCE $ 1,663,637 $ 1,471,791 $ 820,924 $ 364,644 $ 89,404 $ (304,946) $ (518,306) $ (1,731,896)

(1)$10,000 until 2022; can renegotiate in 2022; in effect while property is under tax exempt status (2) Tax capacity multiplied by City's Tax Rate

DRAFT DOCUMENT 10-09-2020 32 CITY OF LITTLE CANADA CAPITAL PROJECTS 2021-2025 INFRASTRUCTURE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND SUMMARY (450) 2019 Actual 2020 Est 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Future REVENUE SUMMARY:

General property tax levy $ 154,041 $ 122,200 $ 122,200 $ 122,200 $ 122,200 $ 122,200 $ 122,200 $ - Assessments 338,125 430,500 274,500 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 Connection charges 51,120 ------Fra-dor license fee (1) 67,788 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 Franchise fee 358,146 358,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 Intergovernmental 895 ------MSA - 527,527 - - - - - MSA Advance 348,000 55,000 Quiet Zone Reimb. 230,537 ------CDBG Grant - 175,000 - - - - - FEMA for County Road B2 73,000 ------Transfer for paver project 48,305 500,000 - - - - - Transfer for Powerline trail land acq. ------Interest 88,715 52,100 24,700 21,000 17,200 14,800 11,200 TOTAL REVENUE $ 1,410,672 $ 2,531,327 $ 844,400 $ 811,200 $ 807,400 $ 805,000 $ 801,400 $ -

EXPENDITURE SUMMARY:

Audit fees $ 1,855 $ 1,890 $ 1,930 $ 1,970 $ 2,010 $ 2,050 $ 2,090 $ - Assessment fees 1,571 1,600 1,630 1,660 1,690 1,720 1,750 General Engineering 21,120 ------Project Costs-Streets (Detail on pg 26) 255,485 3,443,528 1,179,050 1,169,600 1,015,000 1,139,810 1,036,400 1,348,000 Project Costs-Trails (Detail on page 28) ------Project Costs-Storm (Detail on page 29) 91,782 68,936 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 100,000 Transfer to Gen. Cap. Improve. Fund 4,091 23,300 10,000 9,900 8,600 9,700 8,800 11,500 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 375,904 $ 3,539,254 $ 1,207,610 $ 1,198,130 $ 1,042,300 $ 1,168,280 $ 1,064,040 $ 1,459,500

NET INCREASE (DECREASE) $ 1,034,768 $ (1,007,927) $ (363,210) $ (386,930) $ (234,900) $ (363,280) $ (262,640) $ (1,459,500)

BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $ 2,440,050 $ 3,474,818 $ 2,466,891 $ 2,103,681 $ 1,716,751 $ 1,481,851 $ 1,118,571 $ 1,118,571 ENDING FUND BALANCE $ 3,474,818 $ 2,466,891 $ 2,103,681 $ 1,716,751 $ 1,481,851 $ 1,118,571 $ 855,931 $ (340,929)

(1) Interim Use agreement at .20/ton. Increases by CPI each year. Current agreement expires 12/31/2040.

DRAFT DOCUMENT 10-09-2020 33 CITY OF LITTLE CANADA CAPITAL PROJECTS 2021-2025 PARK LAND ACQUISITION FUND SUMMARY (FUND 456) 2019 Actual 2020 Est. 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Future REVENUE SUMMARY:

Park Charge Fee $ 3,500 $ - $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ - Interest 38,370 18,000 6,200 6,100 3,000 1,800 800 TOTAL REVENUE $ 41,870 $ 18,000 $ 16,200 $ 16,100 $ 13,000 $ 11,800 $ 10,800 $ -

EXPENDITURE SUMMARY:

Audit Fees 360 380 390 400 410 420 430 Easement Acquisition 30,000 (1) Trout Brook Regional Trail 7,500 10,000 5,000 Plan for trail connections 15,000 15,000 Waterwoks trail connection 200,000 Appraisals for future trails - 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 30,000 Demolition 15,000 20,000 Land purchase 10 Little Canada Rd 235,000 Land purchase 60 Little Canada Rd 230,000 Transfer to Gen. Cap. Improve. Fund - 325,000 (2) - TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 360 $ 380 $ 27,890 $ 635,400 $ 260,410 $ 205,420 $ 5,430 $ 30,000

NET INCREASE (DECREASE) $ 41,510 $ 17,620 $ (11,690) $ (619,300) $ (247,410) $ (193,620) $ 5,370 $ (30,000)

BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 1,180,410$ 1,221,920$ 1,239,540$ 1,227,850$ $ 608,550 $ 361,140 $ 167,520 $ 167,520 ENDING FUND BALANCE 1,221,920$ 1,239,540$ 1,227,850$ $ 608,550 $ 361,140 $ 167,520 $ 172,890 $ 137,520

(1) Easement Acquisition for Powerline Trail (2) Transfer to General Capital Improvement Fund (400) for Pioneer Park Improvements

DRAFT DOCUMENT 10-09-2020 34 CITY OF LITTLE CANADA CAPITAL PROJECTS 2021-2025 FIRE EQUIPMENT FUND SUMMARY (FUND 457) 2019 Actual 2020 Estimated 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Future REVENUE SUMMARY:

General property tax levy $ 157,448 $ 160,000 $ 160,000 $ 160,000 $ 160,000 $ 160,000 $ 160,000 $ - Donations (1) $ 35,600 $ 49,785 Sale of equipment $ - Interest 31,428 11,000 12,600 13,600 1,900 2,700 4,300 TOTAL REVENUE $ 224,476 $ 220,785 $ 172,600 $ 173,600 $ 161,900 $ 162,700 $ 164,300 $ -

EXPENDITURE SUMMARY:

Aerial Truck (2022) $ - $ - $ - $ 1,352,000 $ - $ - $ - Equip. on pumper truck Grass rig/pickup (2023) 80,560 Rescue/Utility (2025) 623,805 3 Command vehicles (2026-2028) 61,484 61,484 63,700 228,100 Pumper (2028) 988,260 Pumper (2040) 1,718,200 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 61,484 $ 61,484 $ 63,700 $ 1,352,000 $ 80,560 $ - $ 623,805 $ 2,934,560

NET INCREASE (DECREASE) $ 162,992 $ 159,301 $ 108,900 $ (1,178,400) $ 81,340 $ 162,700 $ (459,505) $ (2,934,560)

BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $ 932,736 1,095,728$ 1,255,029$ $ 1,363,929 $ 185,529 $ 266,869 $ 429,569 $ (29,936) ENDING FUND BALANCE 1,095,728$ 1,255,029$ 1,363,929$ $ 185,529 $ 266,869 $ 429,569 $ (29,936) $ (2,964,496)

(1) Little Canada Fire Department contributions toward fire equipment replacement fund.

DRAFT DOCUMENT 10-09-2020 35 CITY OF LITTLE CANADA CAPITAL PROJECTS 2021-2025 10% FUND SUMMARY (FUND 408) 2019 Actual 2020 Est. 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 REVENUE SUMMARY:

10% Gambling Tax $ 39,916 $ 22,000 $ 22,000 $ 22,000 $ 22,000 $ 22,000 $ 22,000 Miscellaneous $ 20,475 Interest 2,362 600 900 1,000 1,200 1,300 1,500 TOTAL REVENUE $ 62,753 $ 22,600 $ 22,900 $ 23,000 $ 23,200 $ 23,300 $ 23,500

EXPENDITURE SUMMARY:

Canadian Days Fireworks 6,500 - 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 Transfer for Park & Rec Salaries Transfer to Gen. Cap. Improve. Fund* 31,401 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 37,901 $ - $ 7,500 $ 7,500 $ 7,500 $ 7,500 $ 7,500

NET INCREASE (DECREASE) $ 24,852 $ 22,600 $ 15,400 $ 15,500 $ 15,700 $ 15,800 $ 16,000

BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $ 38,295 $ 63,147 $ 85,747 $ 101,147 $ 116,647 $ 132,347 $ 148,147 ENDING FUND BALANCE $ 63,147 $ 85,747 $ 101,147 $ 116,647 $ 132,347 $ 148,147 $ 164,147

*For Spooner Park Playground Equipment

DRAFT DOCUMENT 10-09-2020 36 CITY OF LITTLE CANADA CAPITAL PROJECTS 2021-2025 WATER/SEWER EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND SUMMARY (FUND 604) 2019 Actual 2020 Est 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 REVENUE SUMMARY:

Transfer In from Enterprise Fund $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 State-Solar Panel Incentive 4,262 5,350 5, 000 5, 000 5, 000 5,000 5,000 Met Council-I&I Grant ------Misc 7,139 ------Interest 82,907 55,538 26,900 26,900 27,000 24,300 24,300 TOTAL REVENUE $ 394,308 $ 360,888 $ 331,900 $ 331,900 $ 332,000 $ 329,300 $ 329,300

EXPENDITURE SUMMARY:

Administration & Equipment* 410,298 30,449 23,470 11,600 2, 840 109,580 46,620 Lines* 49,304 171,110 65,000 422,500 162,500 150,000 100,000 Facilities* 85,851 37,377 61,000 32,000 48,000 62,000 63,000 Debt Service Payment Transfer 229,500 228,785 229,925 226,925 233,175 229,175 230,175 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 774,953 $ 467,721 $ 379,395 $ 693,025 $ 446,515 $ 550,755 $ 439,795

NET INCREASE (DECREASE) $ (380,645) $ (106,833) $ (47,495) $ (361,125) $ (114,515) $ (221,455) $ (110,495)

BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 2,414,413$ 2,033,768$ 1,926,935$ 1,879,440$ 1,518,315$ 1,403,800$ 1,182,345$ ENDING FUND BALANCE 2,033,768$ 1,926,935$ 1,879,440$ 1,518,315$ 1,403,800$ 1,182,345$ 1,071,850$

Less: Interfund Loan Balance 1,342,881 1,142,881 942,881 742,881 542,881 342,881 142,881 Available Fund Balance $ 690,887 $ 784,054 $ 936,559 $ 775,434 $ 860,919 $ 839,464 $ 928,969

*Details on pages 30-31

DRAFT DOCUMENT 10-09-2020 37 &LW\RI/LWWOH&DQDGD&DSLWDO,PSURYHPHQW3ODQ

'HVFULSWLRQ 3URMHFW&DWHJRU\ Fire Projects Replacement of the fire departments 3URMHFW7LWOH Radio replacement mobile and portable radios. 7RWDO(VWLPDWHG&RVW $ 192,000 )XQGLQJ3ULRULW\

3-expand existing systems, provide new service, or for general community betterm

6RXUFHRI3URMHFW)XQGLQJ     

Fire Equipment Fund (457) $192,000

-XVWLILFDWLRQ 6FKHGXOLQJDQG3URMHFW6WDWXV I had originally requested $160,000 for this The order would be placed sometime after the first of the year, project. I am revising that request due to the with an uknown lead time. following: 1. The State of MN contract with Motorola was renegotiated in the past 2 months and of course the prices went up. 2. I realized some additional radio needs since this item was first budgeted. 3. I neglected to include labor costs for radio (IIHFWRQ$QQXDO2SHUDWLRQDO&RVWV installation.

4. 5HODWLRQVKLSWR6WUDWHJLF3ODQ

38 DRAFT DOCUMENT 10-09-2020 &LW\RI/LWWOH&DQDGD&DSLWDO,PSURYHPHQW3ODQ

Description: Project Category: Park and Recreation Projects New entrance at Gervais Mill Park on Project Title: Gervais Mill Entrance Noel Drive Total Estimated Cost: $ 110,000 Funding Priority:

2-Maintain or make existing systems more efficient

Source of Project Funding 202 202 202 202 202

General Capital Improvements (400) $110,000

Justification: 6FKHGXOLQJDQG3URMHFW6WDWXV New entrance area for the Gervais Mill Park 2020 - Design approval entrance on Noel Drive. Amount increased from 2021 - Project installation and completion 2020 to be able to complete the project.

5HODWLRQVKLSWR6WUDWHJLF3ODQ: (IIHFWRQ$QQXDO2SHUDWLRQDO&RVWV

Enhancing and Empowering the Community 0

Parks & Recreation Commission top priority

Identified in Parks Master Plan

39 DRAFT DOCUMENT 10-09-2020 &LW\RI/LWWOH&DQDGD&DSLWDO,PSURYHPHQW3ODQ

Description: Project Category: Park and Recreation Projects New open-air lower shelter to replace Project Title: Lower Shelter existing shelter Total Estimated Cost: $ 75,000 Funding Priority:

3-expand existing systems, provide new service, or for general community betterm

Source of Project Funding 202 202 202 202 202

General Capital Improvements (400) $75,000

Justification: 6FKHGXOLQJDQG3URMHFW6WDWXV Identified in the Parks Master Plan for needing This was originally scheduled for 2020, but has been moved to to be replaced and was scheduled in the CIP 2021. projects for 2020. This was a top priority of the -Fall/Winter 2020 - Receive bids Parks & Recreation Commission. Council made -Winter 2020 - Accept bids a motion to move forward with getting formal -Spring 2021 - Installation of new shelter quotes at their September 23, 2020 meeting.

5HODWLRQVKLSWR6WUDWHJLF3ODQ: (IIHFWRQ$QQXDO2SHUDWLRQDO&RVWV

Enhancing and Empowering the Community

Identified in Parks Master Plan

40 DRAFT DOCUMENT 10-09-2020 &LW\RI/LWWOH&DQDGD&DSLWDO,PSURYHPHQW3ODQ

Description: Project Category: Park and Recreation Projects Repair damaged trail sections in Project Title: Trail Repair and Maintenance Pioneer Park by removing the existing asphalt and paving a new trail section. Total Estimated Cost: $ 130,000 Funding Priority:

2-Maintain or make existing systems more efficient

Source of Project Funding 202 202 202 202 202

General Capital Improvements (400) $130,000

Justification: 6FKHGXOLQJDQG3URMHFW6WDWXV The are sections of trail in Pioneer Park that are This work would be planned for the summer months of 2021 in poor condition with lots of cracking and some and may be included in the 2021 street projects if some rutting. economies of scale can be gained.

5HODWLRQVKLSWR6WUDWHJLF3ODQ: (IIHFWRQ$QQXDO2SHUDWLRQDO&RVWV Creating Operational Efficiency There should be little to no effect on annual operational costs.

41 DRAFT DOCUMENT 10-09-2020 &LW\RI/LWWOH&DQDGD&DSLWDO,PSURYHPHQW3ODQ

Description: Project Category: Park and Recreation Projects Repair soccer field by adding a layer of Project Title: 2021 - Pioneer Park Soccer Field Repair sand to the field to improve drainage.

Total Estimated Cost: $ 50,000 Funding Priority:

2-Maintain or make existing systems more efficient

Source of Project Funding 202 202 202 202 202

General Capital Improvements (400) $50,000

Justification: 6FKHGXOLQJDQG3URMHFW6WDWXV The soccer field gets heavy use in the This work would likely be completed in the spring so it is ready late-summer and early-fall and when we get a to go for fall summer and fall soccer. lot of rain it doesn't drain well and the field gets really torn up to the point where games have been cancelled due to field conditions. Adding a few inches of sand to the field without tearing the sod up is a good way to help improve drainage so it can support all of the play on it.

5HODWLRQVKLSWR6WUDWHJLF3ODQ: (IIHFWRQ$QQXDO2SHUDWLRQDO&RVWV

Creating operational efficiency There may be a positive effect on the operational budget. If the field drains better less time will be spent trying to get it into shape for play.

42 DRAFT DOCUMENT 10-09-2020 &LW\RI/LWWOH&DQDGD&DSLWDO,PSURYHPHQW3ODQ

Description: Project Category: Park and Recreation Projects Habitat Restoration along the Thunder Project Title: Habitat Restoration Bay / Westwinds Linear Trail. Total Estimated Cost: $ 55,000 Funding Priority:

3-expand existing systems, provide new service, or for general community betterm

Source of Project Funding 202 202 202 202 202

General Capital Improvements (400) $25,000 $15,000 $15,000

Justification: 6FKHGXOLQJDQG3URMHFW6WDWXV Five phase habitat restoration plan. Staff is Phase II - 2020 continuing to work on additional funding Phase III - 2021 opportunities. Phase IV - 2022 Phase V - 2023

5HODWLRQVKLSWR6WUDWHJLF3ODQ: (IIHFWRQ$QQXDO2SHUDWLRQDO&RVWV

Enhancing Identity and Empowering Community Negligible cost - Strategic Direction #1.

43 DRAFT DOCUMENT 10-09-2020 &LW\RI/LWWOH&DQDGD&DSLWDO,PSURYHPHQW3ODQ

Description: Project Category: Park and Recreation Projects Consultant for Parks & Rec projects Project Title: Parks & Rec Consultant Total Estimated Cost: $ 70,000 Funding Priority:

2-Maintain or make existing systems more efficient

Source of Project Funding 202 202 202 202 202

General Capital Improvements (400) $30,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000

Justification: 6FKHGXOLQJDQG3URMHFW6WDWXV Consultant to help continue with the Pioneer Ongoing Parks & Rec Projects Park Planning process and other misc. park projects

5HODWLRQVKLSWR6WUDWHJLF3ODQ: (IIHFWRQ$QQXDO2SHUDWLRQDO&RVWV

Enhancing and Empowering the Community

Creating Operational Efficiency

Identified in Parks Master Plan

44 DRAFT DOCUMENT 10-09-2020 &LW\RI/LWWOH&DQDGD&DSLWDO,PSURYHPHQW3ODQ

Description: Project Category: Park and Recreation Projects Upgrade and replace existing park Project Title: Park Entrance Signs entrance sign at all parks (except Spooner Park) Total Estimated Cost: $ 33,250 Funding Priority:

2-Maintain or make existing systems more efficient

Source of Project Funding 202 202 202 202 202

General Capital Improvements (400) $33,250

Justification: 6FKHGXOLQJDQG3URMHFW6WDWXV Park entrance signs are in need of being 2020 - Research sign material and design upgraded and replaced. 2021 - Installation of new signs

5HODWLRQVKLSWR6WUDWHJLF3ODQ: (IIHFWRQ$QQXDO2SHUDWLRQDO&RVWV

Enhancing Identity and Empowering Community No annual operating costs - Strategic Direction #1.

45 DRAFT DOCUMENT 10-09-2020 &LW\RI/LWWOH&DQDGD&DSLWDO,PSURYHPHQW3ODQ

Description: Project Category: Park and Recreation Projects New interpretive signage at all parks Project Title: Interpretive Signage Total Estimated Cost: $ 20,000 Funding Priority:

3-expand existing systems, provide new service, or for general community betterm

Source of Project Funding 202 202 202 202 202

General Capital Improvements (400) $20,000

Justification: 6FKHGXOLQJDQG3URMHFW6WDWXV This was identified in the Parks Master Plan and Jan-Feb 2021 - Design Interpretive Signs added to the CIP in 2019. It is now moving Mar 2021 - Present first draft to Parks & Recreation forward in 2021. Commission April 2021 - Present Final Draft for Parks & Recreation for approval and recommendation May 2021 - Production of signs July - September 2021 - Installation of signs

5HODWLRQVKLSWR6WUDWHJLF3ODQ: (IIHFWRQ$QQXDO2SHUDWLRQDO&RVWV

Enhancing and Empowering the Community 0

Identified in Parks Master Plan

46 DRAFT DOCUMENT 10-09-2020 &LW\RI/LWWOH&DQDGD&DSLWDO,PSURYHPHQW3ODQ

Description: Project Category: Public Works Projects Replace 2011 Ford pickup and plow. Project Title: 2021 - PW Truck Ford Total Estimated Cost: $ 50,000 Funding Priority:

2-Maintain or make existing systems more efficient

Source of Project Funding 202 202 202 202 202

General Capital Improvements (400) $50,000

Justification: 6FKHGXOLQJDQG3URMHFW6WDWXV Ten year replacement schedule on pickup We would prefer to order the truck in late 2020 or early in 2021 trucks. The body is rusting prematurely due to the long lead time in build out. following an accident in 2012 and it is not for a lack of proper cleaning. It is used to plow cul-de-sacs in the winter so it has hard miles on it with lots of starts and stops and wear and tear on the transmission.

5HODWLRQVKLSWR6WUDWHJLF3ODQ: (IIHFWRQ$QQXDO2SHUDWLRQDO&RVWV

Creating operational efficiency There may be a decrease in maintenance costs associated with the new truck for a few years.

47 DRAFT DOCUMENT 10-09-2020 &LW\RI/LWWOH&DQDGD&DSLWDO,PSURYHPHQW3ODQ

Description: Project Category: Public Works Projects Replace 2011 GMC pickup truck with Project Title: 2021 - Public Works Truck GMC new truck and plow. Total Estimated Cost: $ 48,000 Funding Priority:

2-Maintain or make existing systems more efficient

Source of Project Funding 202 202 202 202 202

General Capital Improvements (400) $48,000

Justification: 6FKHGXOLQJDQG3URMHFW6WDWXV Ten year replacement schedule for pickup We would prefer to order the truck in late-2020 or very early in trucks and there has been increased dollars 2021 due to the long lead time in the build out. spent in repairing the truck and the plow.

5HODWLRQVKLSWR6WUDWHJLF3ODQ: (IIHFWRQ$QQXDO2SHUDWLRQDO&RVWV

Creating operational efficiency There will likely be a decrease in maintenance dollars spent for the first few years.

48 DRAFT DOCUMENT 10-09-2020 &LW\RI/LWWOH&DQDGD&DSLWDO,PSURYHPHQW3ODQ

Description: Project Category: Public Works Projects Replace 2013 Toolcat Project Title: 2021 - Toolcat Total Estimated Cost: $ 56,000 Funding Priority:

2-Maintain or make existing systems more efficient

Source of Project Funding 202 202 202 202 202

General Capital Improvements (400) $56,000

Justification: 6FKHGXOLQJDQG3URMHFW6WDWXV We have a seven year replacement schedule for Would be ordered in early-2021. our Toolcats and this one in particular has given us extra problems the past two years.

5HODWLRQVKLSWR6WUDWHJLF3ODQ: (IIHFWRQ$QQXDO2SHUDWLRQDO&RVWV

Creating operational efficiency May see a decrease in costs associated with maintenance of the machine.

49 DRAFT DOCUMENT 10-09-2020 &LW\RI/LWWOH&DQDGD&DSLWDO,PSURYHPHQW3ODQ

Description: Project Category: Fire Projects Purchase of a new fire command vehicle Project Title: Fire command vehicle purchase Total Estimated Cost: $ 63,700 Funding Priority:

3-expand existing systems, provide new service, or for general community betterm

Source of Project Funding 202 202 202 202 202

Fire Equipment Fund (457) $63,700

Justification: 6FKHGXOLQJDQG3URMHFW6WDWXV As there is no way to predict the timing of an Currently the lead time to order a new vehicle is at least 6 emergency incident there is the need for months. I plan on submitting a request to the council in the designated staff to have ready and immediate next few weeks to place the order and payment would not be access to a response vehicle. In 2018 at our due until after the first of 2021 annual council workshop I discussed the issues we had and are having in regards to the 3 chiefs using their personal vehicles as emergency vehicles. This issue really came to a head in January of 2018 when my vehicle was struck by a semi-truck while on an emergency incident on the interstate. I sustained $29,000 damage to (IIHFWRQ$QQXDO2SHUDWLRQDO&RVWV my personal vehicle and subsequently my insurance carrier canceled my policy because I was using it as an emergency vehicle. Don

5HODWLRQVKLSWR6WUDWHJLF3ODQ:

50 DRAFT DOCUMENT 10-09-2020 &LW\RI/LWWOH&DQDGD&DSLWDO,PSURYHPHQW3ODQ

Description: Project Category: Public Works Projects Purchase portable vacuum unit that Project Title: 2021 - Portable Vacuum Unit mounts to a Toolcat or pickup. Total Estimated Cost: $ 22,000 Funding Priority:

2-Maintain or make existing systems more efficient

Source of Project Funding 202 202 202 202 202

General Capital Improvements (400) $22,000

Justification: 6FKHGXOLQJDQG3URMHFW6WDWXV There are many occasions when a manhole or This unit would be purchased in the winter to have it ready for storm sewer catch basin needs to be sucked out spring maintenance. but it is in an easement or other area that can't be reached by the large Aquatech truck. The portable unit would allow crews to easily take care of sucking out manholes, catch basins, gate valves, and rain garden structures.

5HODWLRQVKLSWR6WUDWHJLF3ODQ: (IIHFWRQ$QQXDO2SHUDWLRQDO&RVWV

Creating operational efficiency There should be little-to-no effect on operational costs. It will save a lot of time and be much more efficient.

51 DRAFT DOCUMENT 10-09-2020 &LW\RI/LWWOH&DQDGD&DSLWDO,PSURYHPHQW3ODQ

Description: Project Category: Water and Sewer Projects This fund covers emergency water main Project Title: 2021 - Misc Water Repairs repairs and restoration. Total Estimated Cost: $ 240,000 Funding Priority:

1-Public health and safety, or to meet legal mandates

Source of Project Funding 202 202 202 202 202

Water/Sewer Replacement Fund (604) $40,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000

Justification: 6FKHGXOLQJDQG3URMHFW6WDWXV Emergency repairs are an ongoing issue with Not possible to schedule the water system and the system is aging to the point where we are seeing more leaks on average each year.

5HODWLRQVKLSWR6WUDWHJLF3ODQ: (IIHFWRQ$QQXDO2SHUDWLRQDO&RVWV

Creating operational efficiency A leak that is undetected for a period of time before surfacing could cost the City quite a bit of money as unaccounted for water.

52 DRAFT DOCUMENT 10-09-2020 &LW\RI/LWWOH&DQDGD&DSLWDO,PSURYHPHQW3ODQ

Description: Project Category: Water and Sewer Projects Replace existing controller at two lift Project Title: 2021 - Lift Station Controller stations as well as the alarm notification system. Total Estimated Cost: $ 30,000 Funding Priority:

1-Public health and safety, or to meet legal mandates

Source of Project Funding 202 202 202 202 202

Water/Sewer Replacement Fund (604) $30,000

Justification: 6FKHGXOLQJDQG3URMHFW6WDWXV We've had problems with two of our lift station This work would likely be completed early in 2021. controllers and we want to start replacing them with up-to-date controllers and alarm notification systems that allow us to do and see more while away from the station.

5HODWLRQVKLSWR6WUDWHJLF3ODQ: (IIHFWRQ$QQXDO2SHUDWLRQDO&RVWV

Creating operational efficiency The new alarm notification system could potentially save a lot of money on call outs as the on call employee may be able to handle some of the problems from home or may not have to respond at all.

53 DRAFT DOCUMENT 10-09-2020 &LW\RI/LWWOH&DQDGD&DSLWDO,PSURYHPHQW3ODQ

Description: Project Category: Water and Sewer Projects Replace the two pumps at the Woodlynn Project Title: 2021 - Woodlynn Lift Station Pumps lift station. Total Estimated Cost: $ 16,000 Funding Priority:

2-Maintain or make existing systems more efficient

Source of Project Funding 202 202 202 202 202

Water/Sewer Replacement Fund (604) $16,000

Justification: 6FKHGXOLQJDQG3URMHFW6WDWXV The pumps are 20+ years old and are past their This work is typically done in the winter or fall. useful life.

5HODWLRQVKLSWR6WUDWHJLF3ODQ: (IIHFWRQ$QQXDO2SHUDWLRQDO&RVWV

Creating operational efficiency This could lower the energy costs associated with the lift station due to more efficient pumps.

54 DRAFT DOCUMENT 10-09-2020

STAFF REPORT

TO: Mayor Keis and Members of City Council

FROM: Chris Heineman, City Administrator Brenda Malinowski, Finance Director Bill Dircks, Public Works Director

DATE: October 14, 2020

RE: Stormwater Utility Information

Stormwater management has long been a major component of municipal operations, and the cost to maintain stormwater infrastructure is continually increasing. In the past two years alone the City has dealt with Twin Lake flooding, new ponds appearing where no ponds used to be, a hillside washout due to a storm pipe separating, and numerous small maintenance projects. The annual cost for the City’s MS4 permit through the MPCA is also expected to increase dramatically starting in 2021. The City was fortunate to get federal aid for Twin Lake and the stormwater washout on County Road B2, but the other items along with numerous deferred maintenance projects add up to significant expenditures and the City has limited funds available in our operating and Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) fund.

Numerous other cities are facing the same reality. Many cities have established stormwater utility funds as a funding source to stay on top of stormwater maintenance and related projects. According to a nationwide study completed in 2019 by Western Kentucky University, there are 198 cities in Minnesota that have an established stormwater utility. That is the most of any state in the nation. The stormwater utilities include large urban municipalities like Minneapolis and St. Paul and small rural communities such as Ashby and Chokio.

The study includes some information on cost per property per month and estimated annual revenues based on the data that could be found on each city’s website. There is a wide range of monthly fees and annual revenues that can be utilized for ongoing stormwater management activities. If sufficient funding is available, a stormwater utility fund can also be used for the stormwater infrastructure component of a street renovation or reconstruction project. On the recent Greenbrier Street reconstruction project, the stormwater component alone added up to 22% ($381,000 of $1.7 million) of the project cost.

Bolton & Menk has completed numerous studies over the years and staff has had discussions with them on how to move forward. They have submitted a plan for arriving at the proper fee to charge and have outlined the costs to accomplish the plan. There may be ways to reduce the final plan cost by utilizing interns and possibly reducing the number of meetings that are held internally. A copy of the proposal submitted by Bolton & Menk is included with this report.

June 19, 2019

Brenda Malinowski, Finance Director City of Little Canada 515 Little Canada Rd East Little Canada, MN 55117

RE: Proposal for the Establishment of a Stormwater Utility Little Canada, Minnesota

Dear Brenda,

The City of Little Canada is in need of a Stormwater Utility to aid in long term funding of stormwater maintenance and improvements. Bolton & Menk has established effective stormwater utilities in numerous communities across Minnesota. This proposal summarizes our services associated with the comprehensive review and establishment of a Storm Water Utility for the City of Little Canada. We are uniquely qualified to provide the requested services because of our vast experience in each of the following:

1. GIS parcel and land use data mining 2. Impervious area generation using advanced GIS computations 3. MS4 permitting 4. Engineering knowledge of storm water capital improvements 5. Stormwater Utility fee structures 6. Integrating new fees with existing utility billing software 7. Public involvement and presentations 8. Ordinance writing 9. Generating Informational Brochures and “Frequently Asked Questions”

We are prepared to use our extensive knowledge and experience to cost effectively assist the City of Little Canada in implementing a new storm water utility that matches the City’s need and equitably distributes its fees. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns regarding the proposal.

Sincerely, Bolton & Menk, Inc.

Mark. D. Kasma, PE Senior Principal Engineer

Cc: Timothy Olson, PE, CFM, Water Resources Project Manager

Proposal for the Establishment of a Stormwater Utility 6/19/2019 Page: 2

Proposed Utility Fee Structure By far, the most legally defensible storm water utilities are based on an Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU) methodology. This method bases the fee on the typical impervious area associated with a residential lot. The ERU impervious area will be determined from a random sample of residences from typical Little Canada developed areas. A sample of 100 – 200 residential lots should statistically represent the entire city. Using GIS and aerial photography, the impervious areas are determined for each parcel in that random sample. If, for example, the average impervious area is 3,000 square feet on the selected sample evaluation, 1 ERU would be equivalent to 3,000 square feet of impervious surface. This ERU is then used to represent all similar residential properties in the city. Then, the impervious area of each non- residential parcel is determined. The imperious square footage of each non-residential parcel is then divided by 3,000 to determine the number of ERUs associated with that parcel. Spreadsheet database, or GIS shapefile and geodatabase, methods are used to assign the number of ERUs for all parcels in the City and the total number of ERUs across the city is determined. When this is done the City can divide its desired annual budget by the number of ERUs to determine the typical fee for a residential lot.

This method is very defensible for cities with well-drained soils because rain that falls on turf and other pervious areas typically infiltrates and less runoff is produced than from impervious surfaces. As such the impervious area is a reasonable measure of the relative runoff generated by each parcel. Hence, the ERU methodology would be a reasonable starting analysis for designing your proposed utility. However, our experience has shown that each city is unique in its storm water service, its utility needs and its political determination of multipliers and impervious area factors. As such, we are prepared to work with you and your staff to compare alternative fee schedules in order to assist you in finding the best fit scenario for Little Canada.

SCOPE OF SERVICES We have prepared the following proposal based on your request for proposed services.

Task 1.0 – Project Meetings and Communication Bolton & Menk, Inc. will hold a Project Kickoff meeting initiating the project. The purpose of this meeting will be to discuss the following. • Introduce the various members of the Bolton & Menk team to City staff, • Finalize the meeting and delivery schedule • Details of the deliverables and data exchange • Desired stormwater budget and what it includes • MS4 permit budget needs • Stormwater components of the Capital Improvement Program • Public involvement plans and schedule • Final implementation • Utility maintenance techniques

Bolton & Menk will present the impervious area analysis methods available and show the expected accuracies. We will also discuss your annual collection expectations and anticipated fee schedules. This will be helpful in evaluating the potential impact of different fee schedules on the Little Canada commercial and industrial properties. It is important to point out that City is unique and the ultimate fee structure can also be unique. We propose to listen to your concerns and work with you to formulate a fee structure that best fits the

Proposal for the Establishment of a Stormwater Utility 6/19/2019 Page: 3

needs of Little Canada, its residents and its businesses.

Task 2.0 – List Activities to be Funded Based on the discussions at the Kickoff meeting and past utility set-up experience, Bolton & Menk will prepare a listing of potential activities to be funded by the proposed utility and the associated costs. This information will be assembled in an annual spreadsheet and GIS database spanning the next ten years and used to help the team determine the annual collection needs.

Task 3.0 – Calculate Impervious Areas The Bolton & Menk GIS staff will begin determining the impervious area of the representative sample residential area and begin analyzing the impervious area of the non-residential areas.

In April 2016 the Metropolitan Council collected high-resolution digital orthoimagery of the 7-county Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. This imagery was collected to provide Generalized Land Use data and is scheduled to be collected again in 2020, which will provide another opportunity to update impervious surface layers. This dataset has three characteristics that made it ideal for mapping impervious surfaces.

1. High resolution - 6 in (15cm). Provides the ability to detect small Impervious features. 2. Collected during leaf-off conditions - Reduces classification error under deciduous canopies. 3. Near-infrared (NIR) band - Green vegetation reflects large amounts of NIR light, while impervious surfaces and water absorb more NIR light, making it easier to spectrally distinguish these land-cover types.

Processing the imagery will include image enhancement techniques and the creation of image derivatives from the raw data using different spectral analyses and statistical tools to better differentiate impervious surfaces from other landcover types. Bolton & Menk will run tests to classify imagery using both pixel and object-based approaches paired with multiple classification algorithms. This multiple-method approach will help best match appropriate methodologies to the characteristics of the imagery and ensures that high-accuracy results are being incorporated into the final city-wide impervious surface layer. This task will also include the use of ancillary datasets and running QA/QC scripts to ensure operational utility and quality of the deliverable datasets.

When the impervious area analysis is completed, the GIS impervious area information will be intersected with GIS Parcel data from the City of Little Canada. We will then provide this information to our Utility Fee Designer in a database which contains all impervious area, total parcel area, and taxpayers’ information that can be used to test at least two alternative fee schedules. Other data including existing zoning designations and utility billing information can also be added if provided by the City in a GIS ready format.

Task 4.0 – Present Spreadsheet Calculations and Pricing Options Once the spreadsheet and GIS databases are complete, programmed to manipulate data on the fly and evaluate fees, it will be presented to the City Staff. Because the spreadsheet will be designed with equations that can calculate alternative pricing options, it can be used in a brainstorming session to test the impacts of various fee scenarios and sorted to determine which parcels have the largest fees.

Proposal for the Establishment of a Stormwater Utility 6/19/2019 Page: 4

This live presentation format is invaluable in forming a consensus for a best fit pricing and collection alternative. This is anticipated to involve two separate meetings with you and key City staff.

As part of these meetings, we will research and provide utility rates in area communities for a “test of reasonableness.” There will also be a comparison of fees for of single family, multi-family, commercial/industrial, undeveloped, institutional, and other lands.

Task 5.0 – Prepare Draft Stormwater Utility Justification Report Based on the tests of reasonableness and the consensus from the Stormwater Utility staff, Bolton & Menk will prepare a Stormwater Utility Justification Report describing: • Proposed rate structure and how it was developed • The fair distribution of fees among runoff generators • Justification of comparable fees in the Metro Area • Estimated stormwater related costs over the next ten years • Anticipated stormwater revenue associated with the proposed revenue. • Current method of payment for stormwater related costs. • New fee structure and how it offsets future cost increases in other utilities. • Draft stormwater utility ordinance.

The report will describe how the utility can/will be used in lieu of assessments and address how the City will handle previously assessed properties. A draft copy of this report will be shared with City staff for their review and comment. Once staff have accepted the draft report, it will be presented at a City Council meeting.

After gaining City Council approval to proceed, Bolton & Menk will generate a newsletter and a list of “Frequently Asked Questions” that can be distributed to the Little Canada citizens and property owners. Bolton & Menk will also coordinate and present the report to the public in an informational open house meeting.

Task 6.0 – Prepare Final Stormwater Utility Justification Report Based on the discussions at these meetings and the direction of City staff, Bolton & Menk will finalize the fee structure and provide the spreadsheet of the final rates to be incorporated into the existing utility billing format.

Task 7.0 – Prepare Final Stormwater Utility Ordinance Bolton & Menk will finalize the Ordinance to match the current law governing stormwater utilities in Minnesota. It is recommended that this ordinance does not include the fee schedule, but that it be incorporated by resolution. This will allow flexibility in the rate schedule without revisiting the ordinance in the future. This ordinance will be submitted to the City attorney for comment prior to presenting it to the City Council for adoption, if desired.

Task 8.0 – Develop Educational Materials Bolton & Menk will assist the City in developing educational materials for the public. This will include the development of a newsletter article, an educational brochure, one public informational meeting presentation and one public hearing with the City Council. The hearing will likely be associated with the proposed Stormwater Utility Ordinance.

Proposal for the Establishment of a Stormwater Utility 6/19/2019 Page: 5

Task 9.0 – Finalize Stormwater Utility Rate Database Upon acceptance of the ordinance, the database that has been described throughout the previous tasks will be finalized to reflect the direction of the council and the accepted ordinance. Bolton & Menk will then work with City staff to incorporate the database into the current utility billing system. This is likely to include new billing names that were not previously included in the utility billing schedule. This is because properties like storage facilities that do not have a need for water and sewer service will now be billed for their contribution to the storm sewer system (an example of the fair distribution of the fees).

Bolton & Menk will also prepare a storm water utility parcel map, showing the various parcels and parcel codes, in a layer format that is compatible with the City GIS system.

Task 10.0 – Develop Administrative Processes Bolton & Menk will work with City staff to develop administrative processes necessary to run the stormwater utility – especially the appeal process for resolving conflicts. This will likely be relative to a credit system for the private best management practices (BMPs) like stormwater ponds, stormwater infiltration, rainwater harvesting, etc.

This administrative process will also include a database updating system that is based on building permits. We typically recommend that the city building permit form include an entry for the increase in impervious area that can be added to the database on a regular schedule.

Proposal for the Establishment of a Stormwater Utility 6/19/2019 Page: 6

FEES We propose to complete the above work described in the Scope of Services for an hourly not-to-exceed fee of $45,000 . This fee includes all work described in Tasks 1 through 10 above and includes 7 separate meetings as listed below.

• 1 Kickoff meeting • 3 City staff/Committee meetings • 2 City Council meetings (includes a public hearing) • 1 Public educational meeting/presentation, if requested

If more meetings are required, our services will be provided at our regular hourly rates for the individuals required to be in attendance.

Client: City of Little Canada Bolton & Menk, Inc. Project: Establishment of a Stormwater Utility

Task Total Total Work Task Description No. Hours Cost Clerical Engineer City Engineer GIS Technician Design Engineer Water Resources Water Resources

1.0 Project Meetings and Communication 16 28 0 0 0 44 $5,000 2.0 List Activities to be Funded 0 8 0 0 0 8 $1,100 3.0 Calculate Impervious Areas 0 2 8 150 0 160 $18,400 4.0 Present Spreadsheet Calculations and Pricing 0 8 12 0 0 20 $2,400 5.0 Prepare Draft Stormwater Utility Justification Report 4 32 8 0 2 46 $5,700 6.0 Prepare Final Stormwater Utility Justification Report 2 8 0 0 0 10 $1,200 7.0 Prepare Final Stormwater Utility Ordinance 2 14 0 0 2 18 $2,200 8.0 Develop Educational Materials 2 12 12 0 4 30 $3,400 9.0 Finalize Stormwater Utility Rate Database 4 10 0 12 0 26 $3,100 10.0 Develop Administrative Processes 4 16 0 0 0 20 $2,500

Total Hours 34 138 40 162 8 382

Total Fee $45,000

TIME LINE Bolton & Menk is ready to begin this work immediately after receiving your acceptance of this proposal. Based on the rigorous public meeting schedule and the mandatory timelines, we believe that this process could take from 6 months to 1 year depending on the response times of the many committee members and various parties that are not under Bolton & Menk control.

Western Kentucky University TopSCHOLAR®

SEAS Faculty Publications School of Engineering and Applied Sciences

6-2019 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 C. Warren Campbell

Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/seas_faculty_pubs Part of the Civil and Environmental Engineering Commons

This Report is brought to you for free and open access by TopSCHOLAR®. It has been accepted for inclusion in SEAS Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of TopSCHOLAR®. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019

C. Warren Campbell

i

Cover

The cover flood picture shows Frank Lloyd Wright’s iconic Falling Water house named in a survey of American Institute of Architects members as the “best all-time work of American architecture.” The house is not insurable under the National Flood Insurance Program because it is built over water.

ii Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 Preface to the 2019 Survey

This is a very exciting year for stormwater utilities. First, New London formed the first stormwater utility in Connecticut. Secondly, New Jersey passed a state law that allows communities to form stormwater utilities in the state. To my knowledge, none have formed yet, but they are progressing. Third, communities in Rhode Island are exploring the possibility of enacting stormwater utilities. Finally, Anchorage, Alaska has contracted for a SWU feasibility study. Their popularity is growing.

I am always surprised by how worked up people get regarding stormwater fees. When I was the City Hydrologist for Huntsville, Alabama we formed a Flood Mitigation Committee to look at ways of protecting Huntsville people and properties from flooding. After a 10-month long process of education for Committee members, we decided that the best and fairest option was a stormwater utility. The Committee voted unanimously to propose that to the City Council. Our very supportive mayor said we needed to set up a meeting with the Huntsville Times Editorial Board. We did this and presented our case. To their credit, they backed us all the way. They wrote an editorial laying out the idea and backing it fully. I always say that the reaction by a small group of people could not have been stronger than if we had proposed to kill the first-born child of every family in Huntsville. At the public meeting these ill-informed people ranted and raved. They deluged the mayor's and Council member's offices with phone calls, emails, and letters. For residential customers we were planning on asking for less than the cost of a glass of wine at a restaurant each month. About 200 committed people controlled the destiny of 170,000 Huntsville residents. After the public meeting the Flood Mitigation Committee Chair wisely asked the committee to vote again on the proposal to develop a stormwater utility for Huntsville. Again, the vote was unanimous in support of a stormwater utility. This was quite a political science lesson for me. You can always educate a few, reasonable, well-informed people of the need for adequate stormwater funding. However, informing the general population is much more difficult. Once the few who shoot from the hip without thinking hit the editorial pages and the television stations freely expressing their opinions, community opinion becomes fixed and it is an uphill battle to change it. If I had it to do over again, I would not have mentioned the fee before a yearlong public education campaign. I would approach those who had experienced floods and ask them to support the idea with letters and emails to the Council and mayor. Going to the Editorial Board seemed like a really good idea at the time, but it was premature. The purpose of this survey has always been to provide information for public education campaigns for those communities who need adequate funding for stormwater programs. I hope it fulfills that purpose.

Warren Campbell Bowling Green, Kentucky June 4, 2019

iii Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019

Methods

The main goal of this survey is to identify as many U.S. Stormwater Utilities (SWUs) as possible. Because many stormwater professionals do not have the time to respond to questionnaires, our primary method of identification was Internet searches. We searched on key terms such as “stormwater utility”, “stormwater fee”, and “drainage fee”. We scoured on-line municipal codes such as Municode, AmLegal, Sterling, LexisNexis, and others. We searched through many city web sites trying to find utilities. We have also had many people contact me to update fees and identify new utilities. However, the data primarily comes from Internet sources and is prone to errors. Some community websites are not very clear on whether the fee given is monthly, bi-monthly, quarterly, of annually. In cases like that I made the best guess I could. We hope the readers of this document will continue to help us correct mistakes. However, it is difficult to keep up with fee changes in more than 1700 utilities, so if you discover errors in our data please contact me at warren.campbellwku.edu.

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed in this document are those of the author. They are not official opinions of Western Kentucky University, its administration, or of any other individuals associated in any way with WKU. The author is an engineer so that any opinions expressed should not in any way be construed by any individual or organization as sound legal advice. The use or misuse of any of the data and information provided herein is the sole responsibility of the user and is not the responsibility of Western Kentucky University, its employees, students, or of any organization associated with the University.

iv Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This year I am seriously indebted to Jerry Bradshaw of SCI Consulting Group in Fairfield, California who provided many citations for stormwater utilities not previously in my database. Thank you, Jerry.

I am also indebted to the Wisconsin chapter of the American Public Works Association for their excellent survey of Wisconsin SWUs (Wisconsin APWA [2019]). Their 2019 survey came out just days before mine.

I want to thank Mike Gregory of Computational Hydraulics International for his updates on Canadian stormwater utilities. Also, the University of North Carolina Environmental Finance Center has identified several SWUs that I have included in this survey.

Black and Veatch (2018) publishes an excellent stormwater utility survey with more detailed information about the SWUs in their survey. In 2018 seventy-five SWUs responded to their survey. It is a very worthwhile survey and should be read by anyone interested in stormwater utilities.

The author is grateful to Professor Randel Dymond and his graduate students Kandace Kea and Amanda Dritschel at Virginia Tech for work they did on past surveys and the database.

Since 2007, many of the SWUs in this survey were identified by our undergraduate students who are listed below. I am very proud of the fact that 59 of my students have passed the Certified Floodplain Manager (CFM) exam. When I came to Kentucky in 2004, I was the 7th CFM in the state. There are 11 states with fewer than 59 CFMs so we are making a contribution to floodplain management. Students contributing to the 2014 and 2016 surveys were:

Kain Kotoucek, CFM Cory Smith, CFM Megan Jones, CFM

Students contributing to the 2013 Survey were:

Jordon Begley Walker Bruns Clayton Cook Aaron Dockery Gabriel Goncalves de Godoy Chris Heil Eathan Johnson Carson Joyce Zach Neihof Ashley Penrod Tyler Sweetland Kirk Thomas Dylan Ward Rory Watson, CFM Doug Woodson, CFM

Students participating in the 2012 survey were:

v Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 Benjamin Bell, CFM Jeremy Brown, CFM Will Spaulding, CFM Justin Wallace, CFM

Contributors from previous years were:

Daniel Douglas Allison Gee Emily Kinslow, CFM Lacie Lawson Kendall McClenny, CFM Kory McDonald Daniel Skees, CFM Brian Vincent, CFM Jason Walker Russ Whatley, CFM Alex Krumenacher, CFM Nick Lawhon, CFM Austin Shields, CFM Adam Disselkamp, CFM Kenneth Marshall Wesley Poynter, CFM Tyler Williams, CFM Brittany Griggs Lisa Heartsill, CFM Spenser Noffsinger, CFM Pat Stevens Tony Stylianides, CFM Scott Wolfe, CFM Darren Back, CFM Robert Dillingham, CFM James Edmunds Scott Embry, CFM Clint Ervin Catie Gay Stevens, CFM Sean O’Bryan, CFM Casey Pedigo Broc Porter Kelly Stolt, CFM Ben Webster, CFM Jon Allen Karla Andrew, CFM Eric Broomfield, CFM Kevin Collignon, CFM Heath Crawford, CFM

vi Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 Adam Evans Cody Humble Steve Hupper, CFM Christine Morgan, CFM Jeremy Rodgers, CFM Matt Stone, CFM Kyle Turpin, CFM Kal Vencill, CFM

The author is grateful to all of these students who have participated in the survey over the past years. They have worked diligently at a somewhat tedious job, but one that should have taught them something about stormwater financing, municipal codes, and websites.

We are also indebted to AMEC for sharing their list of stormwater utilities with us. In 2008, Scott Embry had the foresight to ask them for it and they obliged. We continue to have a good relationship with AMEC.

I also wish to thank the Environmental Finance Center of the University of North Carolina which provided data on several North Carolina and Georgia stormwater utilities (Environmental Finance Center, 2013).

Several companies publish municipal and county codes which serve as a source for much of our data. We are particularly indebted to the Municipal Code Corporation, American Legal Publishing Corporation, Lexis Nexis, and Sterling Codifiers, Inc.

vii Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 Introduction

We have been able to identify 1716 U.S. stormwater utilities that have formed nationwide and 29 in Canada. There are now 6 states with 100 or more stormwater utilities (SWUs). Forty states and DC have at least one SWU. Figure 1 shows U.S. stormwater utilities by location.

As Figure 2 shows, one of the very disappointing aspects of the SWU map is that Louisiana and Mississippi have missed a golden opportunity to encourage stormwater utilities. Twelve years after Hurricane Katrina, neither of the hardest hit states has formed a SWU as far as we can tell. However, New Orleans is considering a stormwater utility to maintain their extensive flood protection systems. Also, until recently neither of the two states hardest hit by Hurricane Sandy (NJ and CT) had a stormwater utility. Now Connecticut has its first (New London) and New Jersey has passed a state law allowing stormwater utilities to form in the state. Anchorage, Alaska has let a contract to develop a stormwater utility. If these come to fruition, we will have more states with SWUs.

One community official said, “We are too small to have a stormwater utility.” The smallest community with a stormwater utility that we have found is Indian Creek Village, Florida with a 2010 census population of 88 (no, this is not a misprint). The largest community is Los Angeles with a population exceeding 3,000,000. The average SWU community population is about 68500 and the median is 18,493. No community is too small nor too large to have a stormwater utility.

At some point, this survey will become unnecessary as every community will have some appropriate stormwater funding mechanism. When will this occur? We have identified 1681 SWUs in the U.S. and 29 in Canada, and as this is written 22,389 communities participate in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) (FEMA’s Community Status Book: https://www.fema.gov/cis/nation.pdf). This survey will be necessary for some years to come.

The Data

Part of our raw data is contained in the Table in Appendix A. As this is written, our survey contains data on 1716 stormwater utilities (SWUs) located in 40 states and the District of Columbia (Figure 1). Based on our current find rate, my best guess would be that there are more than 2000 SWUs in the U.S. More are being formed all the time and we are aware of several that will form within the next few months.

Figure 2 shows the number of stormwater utilities by state. It also emphasizes that SWU formation is not governed by politics. Red states supported the Republican candidate in the 2016 presidential election and blue states the Democratic candidate. At least 6 states have more than 100 SWUs. Democratic leaning Washington and Minnesota have more than 100 SWUs while conservative leaning Texas, Ohio, and Florida also have more than 100.

Nationwide, the average monthly single-family residential fee was $5.85, the standard deviation was $4.50, and the median fee was $4.75. Most fees go up over time reflecting an increase in the Consumer Price Index (CPI). Some communities actually tie the monthly fee to the CPI. However, several communities have reduced their fees. The quartile fees are: 25% - $3.00, 50 % - $4.75, and 75 % - $7.15 for an interquartile range of $4.15.

1

Fees ranged from zero up to $45 per month. Figure 3 shows the spatial distribution of monthly fees. As has been observed in previous surveys, no state has all high fees. Even states with the higher fees also have utilities with much lower fees. The range of fee amounts probably reflects stormwater needs and local political realities.

Figure 1. U.S. stormwater utilities (SWUs)

The most widely used method of funding is the ERU system. An Equivalent Residential Unit is usually the average impervious area on a single-family residential parcel, although some communities define it as the average of all residential parcels. Fees for non-residential properties are proportional to the ratio of the parcel impervious area to the ERU. For the ERUs identified in our survey, the median was 2902 square feet impervious with a standard deviation of 8757 square feet. We were able to find ERUs for 800 utilities (Figure 4). It is important to have a good estimate of the ERU because an inaccurate ERU means that someone is paying a disproportionate amount which could increase legal exposure (Campbell [2010]). The second and third most popular fee systems were the tier fee (245 SWUs) and the flat fee (236 SWUs) systems. Next in popularity was the Residential Equivalent Factor (REF) system with 140 identified. We were able to identify 110 Dual Fee systems.

2 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019

Figure 2. Number of stormwater utilities by state

3 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019

Figure 3. Spatial distribution of monthly stormwater fees

Figure 4 is another interesting way to look at the data. Figure 2 shows that the number of fees is not related to political leanings. Comparing Figure 4 to Figure 2, we see that the highest fee is in Washington state, a Democrat leaning state. However, the second highest fee is Nevada, a Republican leaning state. In the Figure, states showing a median monthly fee of zero are states without idenitifed stormwater utilities.

4 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019

Figure 4. Median Monthly Fees by State

5 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 Canadian Stormwater Utilities

Mike Gregory found 29 Canadian communities with stormwater utilities. From Figure 5, there appears to be some cross -border communication especially in British Columbia/Washington and in Ontario/Michigan/Ohio/Indiana. Of the 29 SWUs he was able to find 7 that used an ERU fee system. In Canada the most popular system is the tier system and he was able to identify 11 of those. We received no additional information on Canadian SWUs in 2019, so the graph is the same as last year.

Figure 5. Canadian communities with stormwater utilities.

Summary

This was a very exciting year for stormwater utilities. Connecticut got its first, New London. New Jersey signed into law clear statutory authority to create stormwater utilities and several New Jersey communities are looking into developing them. Stormwater utilities continue to develop in Pennsylvania and now there are at least 27. About one decade ago, Philadelphia formed the first in the state. New Orleans and Anchorage, Alaska are considering them which raises the possibility that two more states will have SWUs. Once the ice is broken, more will likely form. Stormwater utilities make sense because they can be made fair and provide consistent funding for stormwater programs. While political and legal opposition have forced some SWUs to shut down, the trend is for more and more to form.

6 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 It is not clear why stormwater utilities form quickly in some states like Pennsylvania and very slowly in others. It has nothing to do with political leanings in a state as indicated in Figure 2. The only clear obstacle is lack of clear state law allowing them to form, or state law like California’s Prop 218 aimed at discouraging them.

Stormwater utilities continue to be challenged in court. Usually, but not always, the utilities win. They can be set up with fee systems that are fair with a clear nexus between services rendered and fee. These have minimum legal exposure. They can also be set up in a way that increases legal exposure.

The best SWU ordinances have teeth. These allow the SWU community to turn off water and/or power for customers who refuse to pay. The worst ones only allow the utility to take non-paying customers to court. In these cases the community may have to wait years until unpaid fees accumulate so that taking the non-payers to court makes sense. Contrast this to the experience of Garden City, Georgia. A Georgia attorney general wrote an opinion that state agencies were not required to pay stormwater fees. The state Department of Agriculture wrote the Garden City utility that in accordance with the attorney general’s opinion they would not be paying their stormwater fee. The utility wrote back that in accordance with their ordinance they would be turning off water and power for the Department of Agriculture. The Department reconsidered their decision.

7 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 References

Black and Veatch (2018). “2018 Stormwater Utility Survey,” https://www.bv.com/sites/default/files/18%20Stormwater%20Utility%20Survey%20Report%20 WEB.pdf, 48 pp.

Black and Veatch (2014). “2014 Stormwater Utility Survey,” 24 pp.

Campbell, C. Warren (2017). "The Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2017," https://www.wku.edu/seas/undergradprogramdescription/stormwaterutilitysurvey.php, Bowling Green, Kentucky.

Campbell, C. Warren, Dymond, Randel, Dritschel, Amanda (2016). “The Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2016,” Stormwater Utility SurveysBowling Green, Kentucky.

Campbell, C. Warren, Dymond, Randel, Kea, Kandace, Dritschel, Amanda (2014). “The Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2014,” Stormwater Utility Surveys, Bowling Green, Kentucky.

Campbell, C. Warren (2013). “The Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2013,” Stormwater Utility Surveys Bowling Green, Kentucky.

Campbell, C. Warren (2012). “The Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2012,” Stormwater Utility Surveys, Bowling Green, Kentucky.

Campbell, C. Warren (2011). “The Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2011,” Stormwater Utility Surveys Bowling Green, Kentucky.

Campbell, C. Warren (2010). “The Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2010,” Stormwater Utility Surveys/, Bowling Green, Kentucky.

Campbell, C. Warren (2009). “The Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2009,” Stormwater Utility Surveys, Bowling Green, Kentucky.

Campbell, C. Warren, and Back, A. Darren (2008). “The Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2008,” Stormwater Utility Surveys/, Bowling Green, Kentucky.

Campbell, C. Warren (2007). “The Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2007,” Stormwater Utility Surveys/, Bowling Green, Kentucky.

England, Kate, New England Survey: http://kate-england.com/new-england-stormwater-utilities/#link5

Environmental Finance Center (2013). University of North Carolina, http://efc.unc.edu/index.html.

Otto, Rebecca (2011). “Minnesota City Finances: 2010 Revenues, Expenditures, and Debt,” Office of the State Auditor, St. Paul, Minnesota, 312 pp.

8 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 Wisconsin APWA Chapter (2019). “WI Stormwater User Charge System Information,” http://wisconsin.apwa.net/Content/Chapters/wisconsin.apwa.net/Documents/SUMatrix%2020 19%2006%2010.pdf, 3 pp.

Wisconsin APWA Chapter (2010). “WI Stormwater User Charge Information,” http://wisconsin.apwa.net/chapters/wisconsin/documents/SUMatrixAPWA%285%29.pdf, 1 p.

9 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 Appendix A. Raw Data Tables

The following data tables provide the information collected on 1639 U.S. stormwater utilities and 22 Canadian ones. Note that ERUs in the Canadian SWUs are in square meters impervious. The key for the fee types is given below.

Code Meaning IA Impervious Area E ERU F Fixed Rate T Tier System R Residential Equivalence Factor (or similar) D Two Level System (Residential/Commercial) X No information S Fee per Parcel Square Footage A Fee per Parcel Acre - Repealed M Water Meter W By Water Usage V Existence of SWU/ Fee verified AV Ad valorem fee LU Land use based fee

10 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 Table A-1. U.S. Stormwater Utility Database

No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 1 Anniston AL IA $0.83 2014 22,112 2 Birmingham AL T $16.75 212,157 3 Jefferson County, Unincorp. AL F 4 Madison AL IA $0.83 2014 48,861 5 Mobile AL E $0.83 2009 195,111 6 Montgomery AL IA $0.83 2016 199,518 7 Bryant AR D $5.00 2015 20,194 8 Hot Springs AR D $4.25 2008 35,680 $671,500 9 Flagstaff AZ T $3.74 2003 68,667 $1,444,719 10 Mesa AZ F $7.32 2006 462,821 $10,606,284 11 Oro Valley AZ E 4000 $4.50 2008 41,627 $762,600 12 Peoria AZ F $1.00 1995 154,065 $798,700 13 Scottsdale AZ F $3.10 2016 226,918 14 Surprise AZ E 3420 $2.00 2016 117,517 15 Albany CA F $3.47 1992 18,539 16 Arcata CA E 2500 $1.96 2001 17,231 17 Berkeley CA R $3.83 1991 112,580 $2,500,000 18 Burlingame CA A $10.48 2009 28,806 $2,500,000 19 Carlsbad CA F $1.95 1994 106,000 20 Carmel-by-the-Sea CA E 4000 $8.77 2001 15,677 21 Chino CA T $8.96 1989 77,983 $3,629,655 22 Citrus Heights CA R 1997 83,301 23 Contra Costa County CA E 5,000 $2.50 2012 1,041,274 24 Davis CA A $0.67 2012 65,622 25 Del Mar CA W $12.52 2009 4,161 26 Dixon CA F $3.77 18,351 27 El Paso de Robles CA V 24,297

11

No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 28 Elk Grove CA IA $11.68 2004 153,015 29 Escalon CA T 1993 7,132 30 Escondido CA V $2.10 1994 143,911 31 Folsom CA V 1990 72,203 32 Fortuna CA A $0.55 1993 11,926 33 Galt CA F $2.43 2002 23,647 34 Grover Beach CA F $4.85 13,275 35 Hollister CA V 34,928 36 Larkspur CA E 3,000 $1.25 1995 11,926 $93,000 37 Los Angeles CA R $8.25 1993 3,792,621 $28,000,000 38 Millbrae CA W $23.71 20,532 39 Modesto CA F $3.23 2004 201,165 40 Monterey CA F $5.44 1997 27,810 41 Oceanside CA F $1.00 2002 167,086 42 Ontario CA R 2002 163,924 43 Palo Alto CA T $13.65 1989 64,403 44 Pinole CA F $2.92 1979 18,390 $280,000 45 Poway CA V $4.36 47,811 46 Rancho Cordova CA E 3,500 $5.54 1996 64,776 47 Rancho Palos Verdes CA E 3,804 $8.06 2005 41,643 48 Redding CA T $1.32 1993 89,861 49 Richmond CA V 103,701 50 Sacramento CA D $11.31 466,488 51 Sacramento County CA F $5.84 1995 1,400,949 52 Salinas CA V 150,441 53 San Bruno CA A $4.20 1993 41,114 $542,300 54 San Carlos CA T 1994 28,755 55 San Clemente CA T $5.10 1993 63,522 56 San Diego CA W $1.90 1990 1,307,402 $5,700,000

12 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 57 San Jose CA T $7.87 1982 945,942 $32,504,256 58 San Marcos CA F $1.77 2001 83,781 59 San Ramon CA F $1.92 1993 73,333 60 Santa Clara County CA V 1,784,642 61 Santa Clarita CA F $2.12 1994 176,320 62 Santa Cruz CA T $1.77 1994 59,946 $2,152,000 63 Santa Monica CA R 1995 89,736 $1,097,210 64 Santa Rosa CA F $1.96 1996 167,815 65 South San Francisco CA V 1994 63,632 66 Stockton CA E 2,347 $2.10 291,707 67 Tracy CA E 3,140 $1.20 84,266 68 Vallejo CA F $1.97 115,942 69 Vista CA F $1.80 93,834 70 Woodland CA T $0.48 55,468 71 Adams County CO A $6.90 2012 469,193 $2,032,626 72 Arvada CO IA $4.56 2002 106,433 $3,100,000 73 Aurora CO E 2,500 $10.46 2002 345,803 74 Berthoud CO F $3.50 1989 5,105 $278,360 75 Boulder CO R $16.82 1974 310,048 $5,301,116 76 Brighton CO T $5.50 2011 35,719 $234,000 77 Canon City CO IA $11.09 2004 16,318 $964,698 78 Castle Rock CO E 3,255 $7.12 2002 48,231 $2,264,847 79 Colorado Springs CO A $5.00 2005 416,427 80 Denver CO T $12.75 1980 649,495 81 Englewood CO A $1.39 30,255 $316,244 82 Erie CO E 5,300 $11.98 2003 19,723 $401,146 83 Evans CO A $9.43 1998 18,537 84 Federal Heights CO IA $3.15 2001 11,973 $400,000 85 Firestone CO IA $7.00 2009 11,175 $114,500

13 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 86 Fort Collins CO R $21.31 1986 152,061 $14,414,000 87 Fountain CO V 25,846 88 Frederick CO A $7.25 2008 10,196 $405,000 89 Golden CO IA $4.22 1997 19,393 $934,650 90 Grand Junction CO E 2,500 $3.00 2015 61,881 91 Greeley CO A $23.34 2002 96,539 $3,766,814 92 Idaho Springs CO V 2006 1,717 93 Lafayette CO F $9.38 2007 24,453 94 Lakewood CO D $3.97 1998 147,214 $2,480,000 95 Larimer County CO T 315,988 96 Littleton CO A $2.84 1986 44,275 $575,037 97 Longmont CO A $13.05 1984 89,919 $3,765,252 98 Louisville CO E 3,500 $4.71 2007 19,588 $514,700 99 Loveland CO T $19.53 1987 71,334 $4,601,940 100 Lyons CO F $10.00 2018 2,148 101 Northglenn CO A $2.00 2004 37,499 $430,000 102 Parker CO E 4,000 $7.49 1999 48,608 $1,769,200 103 Pueblo CO A $5.36 2003 108,249 $100,000 104 Sheridan CO D $3.00 2005 5,874 $71,500 105 Southeast Metro Stormwater Authority CO T $8.61 2006 $9,285,550 106 Wellington CO T $5.00 2008 8,516 107 Westminster CO T $6.00 2001 110,945 $2,798,000 108 Windsor CO R $6.62 2003 20,422 $243,924 109 Woodland Park CO D $2.00 1994 7,153 110 New London CT T $7.50 2018 27,569 111 Washington DC T $2.67 601,723 112 Lewes DE F $5.00 2010 2,747 113 Newark DE E 1,620 $3.54 2017 33,398 114 Wilmington DE T $7.18 2006 71,305

14 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 115 Alachua County FL V 1996 243,574 $895,000 116 Altamonte Springs FL E 2,492 $6.75 1989 41,496 117 Anna Maria FL E 2,254 $3.75 2008 1,503 118 Apopka FL T $15.00 2002 41,542 119 Atlantic Beach FL E 1,790 $8.39 1991 12,655 120 Auburndale FL F $0.75 13,675 $50,000 121 Aventura FL E 1,548 $2.50 1997 36,610 122 Bartow FL E 2,520 $3.75 2005 17,501 123 Bay County FL D $3.33 2005 169,856 $1,500,000 124 Bay Harbor Islands FL E 1,548 $5.00 1996 5,762 125 Belle Glade FL V 1998 17,667 126 Belle Isle FL E 4,087 $4.00 2005 6,111 127 Belleair FL E 5,459 $11.92 2012 128 Boca Raton FL E 2,837 $3.11 1993 85,329 129 Boynton Beach FL E 1,937 $5.00 1993 68,996 130 Bradenton FL F $4.50 1996 50,193 131 Bradenton Beach FL F $9.58 2004 1,187 132 Brevard County FL E 2,500 $3.00 1990 543,566 $3,000,000 133 Callaway FL F $1.00 1991 14,493 134 Cape Canaveral FL T $8.00 2003 9,916 135 Cape Coral FL A $3.00 2004 157,476 $10,420,542 136 Casselberry FL E 2,304 $8.40 1993 26,387 $2,235,439 137 Charlotte County FL F $2.50 1991 160,511 138 Clearwater FL E 1,830 $14.15 1991 107,784 $16,125,100 139 Clermont FL E 3,154 $5.00 1990 29,126 140 Cocoa FL E 2,166 $7.00 1992 17,147 141 Cocoa Beach FL E 2,900 $8.75 2003 11,235 142 Coconut Creek FL E 2,070 $3.87 2004 53,915 143 Collier County FL V 1991 328,134 $9,060,000

15 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 144 Coral Gables FL E 2,346 $14.73 1993 47,783 $4,130,000 145 Cutler Bay FL E 1,548 $4.00 2007 44,300 146 Daytona Beach FL E 1,661 $8.67 2004 61,028 $9,785,395 147 DeLand FL E 3,100 $8.69 2009 27,041 148 DeBary FL E 2,560 $7.00 2005 19,324 149 Delray Beach FL E 2,502 $5.33 1990 61,209 150 Deltona FL E 3,484 $6.34 1996 85,219 $3,035,369 151 Doral FL E 1,548 $4.00 2005 46,789 152 Dundee FL E 4,749 $1.20 2003 3,764 153 Dunedin FL E 1,708 $11.49 2007 35,354 154 Eagle Lake FL D $4.00 2007 2,283 155 Edgewater FL E 2,027 $10.00 2004 20,761 156 El Portal FL E 1,548 $3.00 2,380 157 Eustis FL D $6.00 1997 18,805 158 Fellsmere FL F $4.00 2013 3,813 159 Fernandina Beach FL F $4.00 2012 11,705 $156,000 160 Florida City FL E 1,250 $2.50 2000 11,511 161 Fort Lauderdale FL T $12.00 1992 168,528 162 Fort Meade FL T $4.25 1990 5,696 $139,000 163 Fort Myers FL E 500 $9.12 2009 63,512 164 Fort Pierce FL E 2,186 $4.50 2005 41,993 165 Fort Walton Beach FL E 3,200 $5.00 1990 19,793 $1,030,654 166 Frostproof FL F $3.00 1997 3,030 167 Fruitland Park FL F $2.00 2005 4,132 168 Gainesville FL E 2,300 $9.45 1988 125,326 169 Golden Beach FL E 8,000 $35.00 1993 940 170 Grant-Valkaria FL E 2,500 $3.00 2008 3,851 171 Gulf Breeze FL E 4,450 $5.07 2006 5,870 $713,894 172 Gulfport FL E 2,300 $3.21 1995 12,041

16 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 173 Haines City FL T 2002 20,807 $180,000 174 Hallandale Beach FL E 958 $3.35 1980 37,800 175 Hernando County FL - 2003 173,094 176 Hialeah FL E 1,664 $2.50 1998 229,969 177 Hialeah Gardens FL E 1,267 $2.00 1996 19,297 178 Hillsborough County FL E $3.50 1989 1,267,775 $23,925,000 179 Holly Hill FL E 2,050 $7.00 1997 11,663 180 Hollywood FL E 2,250 $3.22 1993 143,357 181 Homestead FL E 2,000 $3.37 1992 61,940 182 Indian Creek Village FL E 1,548 $4.00 1999 88 183 Indian Harbor Beach FL E 2,500 $3.00 8,228 184 Jacksonville FL E 3,100 $5.00 2007 827,908 185 Jacksonville Beach FL E 1,541 $5.00 1990 21,523 186 Jupiter FL E 2,651 $5.33 1994 55,911 187 Key Biscayne FL E 1,083 $7.50 1993 12,637 188 Key West FL E 1,400 $7.35 2001 24,909 189 Kissimmee FL E 2,404 $7.38 1989 61,346 190 Lake Alfred FL T $2.00 1999 5,077 191 Lake Mary FL E 4,576 $4.00 13,900 $275,500 192 Lake Worth FL E 1,748 $5.80 1993 35,306 193 Lakeland FL E 5,000 $6.00 1999 98,589 $4,400,000 194 Largo FL E 2,257 $6.65 1989 77,723 $3,436,598 195 Lauderdale Lakes FL E 2,133 $4.57 1997 33,191 196 Lauderdale-by-the-Sea FL E 4,472 $3.50 2004 6,168 197 Lauderhill FL M $17.30 68,117 198 Leesburg FL E 2,000 $6.00 1994 20,390 199 Leon County FL E 2,723 $1.67 1991 277,971 200 Longwood FL E 2,898 $6.00 13,745 201 Madeira Beach FL E 1,249 $5.00 4,267

17 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 202 Maitland FL E 2,532 $9.60 2008 16,076 203 Malabar FL E 2,500 $3.00 1992 2,758 204 Manatee County FL V 1991 327,142 205 Marathon FL E 4,769 $10.00 2005 8,387 206 Margate FL E 2,382 $5.46 1993 54,270 207 Marion County FL E 2,275 $1.25 332,529 $3,696,468 208 Martin County FL E 3,428 2009 147,495 $7,200,000 209 Medley FL E 1,487 $3.00 1991 857 $1,800,000 210 Melbourne FL E 2,500 $3.00 1999 76,095 $750,000 211 Melbourne Beach FL E 2,500 $3.00 2000 3,102 212 Miami Beach FL E 791 $9.06 1996 89,840 $12,097,000 213 Miami Gardens FL E 1,800 $6.00 2006 109,680 214 Miami Shores FL E 2,466 $3.75 2000 10,720 215 Miami Springs FL F $3.67 1993 14,129 216 Miami-Dade County FL E 1,548 $5.00 2004 408,750 217 Milton FL V 2008 8,984 218 Minneola FL E 3,050 $4.00 2001 9,531 $226,302 219 Miramar FL F $7.00 1998 124,302 220 Mount Dora FL E 2,500 $5.00 12,534 221 Mulberry FL E 3,250 $4.00 3,867 222 Naples FL E 1,934 $13.68 1994 19,939 223 Neptune Beach FL E 3,164 $3.00 2002 7,090 $280,000 224 New Port Richey FL E 2,629 $3.36 2001 14,961 225 New Smyrna Beach FL E 1,818 $7.00 1995 22,481 226 Niceville FL T $4.51 2004 12,941 227 North Bay Village FL D $7.72 1994 7,305 228 North Lauderdale FL E 2,138 $6.00 1995 41,782 229 North Miami FL E 1,760 $6.19 1998 60,143 $1,300,000 230 North Miami Beach FL E 1,800 $4.50 1992 42,504

18 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 231 North Redington Beach FL E 1,687 1,418 232 Oakland Park FL E 1,507 $6.00 1989 42,126 $2,800,000 233 Ocala FL E 1,948 $6.39 1988 56,517 234 Ocoee FL E 2,054 $7.00 36,320 235 Oldsmar FL E 2,550 $3.00 1998 13,618 236 Opa-Locka FL E 1,548 $6.00 15,579 237 Orange County FL V 1996 1,169,107 238 Orlando FL E 2,000 $9.99 1989 243,195 239 Ormond Beach FL E 3,000 $7.00 1987 38,153 240 Oviedo FL E 2,464 $7.00 1993 33,528 241 Palm Bay FL E 4,602 $14.76 2010 103,227 $3,500,000 242 Palm Coast FL E 3,432 $15.55 2004 76,499 $5,400,000 243 Palm Springs FL 2015 18,928 244 Palmetto FL IA $14.12 1999 12,774 245 Panama City FL V $6.66 1991 36,686 246 Pasco County FL E 2,890 $7.92 2007 466,457 247 Pembroke Park FL E 1,548 $2.00 1996 6,214 248 Pensacola FL E 2,998 $6.02 2001 52,197 $2,631,250 249 Pinecrest FL E 1,548 $10.00 2002 18,657 250 Pinellas County FL E 2,339 $9.81 2013 929,048 251 Plant City FL E 2,280 $5.50 2004 35,817 $2,813,800 252 Plantation FL E 4,489 $2.50 2012 86,524 $1,300,000 253 Polk City FL E 4,030 $4.53 2012 1,580 254 Polk County FL - 2012 609,492 $1,500,000 255 Pompano Beach FL E 2,880 $3.00 1997 78,191 $2,100,000 256 Port Orange FL E 3,050 $9.58 1993 45,823 257 Port Saint Lucie FL T 1988 88,769 $19,335,600 258 Redington Beach FL F $7.50 1,539 259 Riviera Beach FL E 1,920 $4.50 2003 29,884 $500,000

19 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 260 Rockledge FL E 2,922 $5.00 2000 20,170 261 Royal Palm Beach FL E 2,723 $5.50 2012 31,864 262 Safety Harbor FL E 1,865 $10.30 16,884 263 Saint Augustine FL T $7.00 1993 14,280 264 Saint Cloud FL E 2,664 $6.35 2007 20,074 265 Saint Johns County FL E 3,000 $6.50 1994 123,135 266 Saint Pete Beach FL E 3,813 $3.69 9,391 267 Saint Petersburg FL E 2,719 $11.00 1989 248,232 $2,400,000 268 Sanford FL E 2,126 $7.63 1991 38,291 269 Sarasota County FL E 3,153 $7.55 1989 325,957 270 Satellite Beach FL E 3,000 $8.67 1997 10,109 $3,258,232 271 Sebastian FL E 3,285 $10.00 2001 20,339 $1,299,000 272 South Daytona FL E 2,000 $9.00 1989 13,177 273 South Miami FL E 1,865 $3.00 2000 10,741 274 Stuart FL E 3,707 $4.18 2000 14,633 $614,975 275 Sunny Isles Beach FL E 1,548 $4.00 1999 15,315 276 Sunrise FL E 1,884 $8.36 1997 85,779 $6,202,817 277 Surfside FL E 1,040 $10.70 1998 4,909 278 Sweetwater FL E 1,548 $4.00 2000 14,226 279 Tallahassee FL E 1,990 $8.35 1986 150,624 280 Tamarac FL E 1,830 $10.65 1993 55,588 281 Tampa FL E 3,310 $6.83 2003 303,447 $14,100,000 282 Tarpon Springs FL E 1,945 $5.65 1992 21,003 283 Tavares FL E 3,000 $10.00 14,248 $684,490 284 Tequesta FL E 2,507 $8.23 5,273 285 Titusville FL R $7.49 1990 40,670 286 Treasure Island FL E 1,513 $12.14 1994 7,450 287 Umatilla FL E 3,000 $4.00 2008 2,896 288 Venice FL R 1995 17,764 $1,533,957

20 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 289 Volusia County FL E 2,775 $10.50 1992 443,343 290 West Melbourne FL E 2,500 $5.33 1992 9,824 291 West Miami FL E 1,400 $2.50 1996 5,863 292 West Palm Beach FL E 2,171 $8.48 82,103 $6,830,000 293 West Park FL E 1,351 $3.50 2012 14,609 $315,000 294 Wilton Manors FL E 3,460 $5.58 1992 12,697 295 Winter Garden FL E 4,077 $5.13 2006 14,351 296 Winter Haven FL F $3.56 1998 26,487 297 Winter Park FL E 2,324 $13.21 24,090 298 Winter Springs FL E 2,123 $5.50 1992 31,666 299 Albany GA E 2,700 $3.00 2014 77,431 300 Americus GA E 3,000 $4.00 2010 17,103 $860,000 301 Athens - Clarke County GA E 2,628 $2.10 2004 101,489 $3,400,000 302 Atlanta GA - 416,474 303 Auburn GA T 2011 6,900 304 Augusta GA E 2,200 $6.40 2015 197,872 305 Austell GA E 3,100 $5.00 5,200 306 Avondale Estates GA E 2,900 $5.00 2004 2,995 307 Barrow County GA E 3,478 $1.50 2008 46,144 308 Braselton GA E 3,478 $1.50 1,206 309 Brookhaven GA E 3,000 $5.00 2013 52,444 310 Brunswick GA E 2,200 $3.95 2018 16,287 $1,040,000 311 Camilla GA E 3,360 $4.00 2010 5,669 312 Canton GA E 2,000 $2.65 7,709 313 Cartersville GA E 3,000 $3.75 15,925 314 Centerville GA E 3,900 $4.25 2016 7,148 315 Chamblee GA E 3,000 $4.00 2004 9,552 $677,715 316 Chickamaugua GA 2009 3,101 317 Clayton County GA E 2,950 $3.75 2006 236,517

21 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 318 College Park GA E 3,523 $3.00 2007 20,382 319 Columbia County GA IA $5.33 1999 89,288 320 Conyers GA T $3.33 2002 10,689 $413,000 321 Covington GA E 2,600 $3.00 2005 13,226 322 Dalton GA F $2.00 2018 34,077 323 Decatur GA E 2,900 $6.25 1999 18,147 324 DeKalb County GA E 3,000 $4.00 2003 665,865 325 Doraville GA E 3,000 $4.00 2005 9,862 $520,000 326 Douglasville-Douglas County GA E 2,543 $4.00 2003 92,174 $4,000,000 327 Duluth GA E 2,654 $3.00 2011 22,122 $837,836 328 Dunwoody GA E 3,000 $5.75 2009 46,267 329 East Point GA E 3,200 $9.15 330 Evans GA E 100 $0.09 17,727 331 Fairburn GA T $4.08 2005 5,464 $450,000 332 Fayette County GA E 1,000 $0.35 2011 107,784 333 Fayetteville GA E 3,800 $2.95 2004 11,148 $500,000 334 Garden City GA E 3,000 $4.75 2008 11,289 335 Gilmer County GA V 23,456 336 Griffin GA E 2,200 $5.27 1998 23,451 $1,700,000 337 Gwinnett County GA E 100 $6.97 2006 588,448 338 Hapeville GA E 2,400 $3.50 2016 6,373 339 Henry County GA E 4,780 $3.32 2006 119,341 340 Hinesville GA E 2,635 $6.42 30,392 341 Holly Springs GA E 2,700 $4.00 2009 3,195 342 Kennesaw GA D $5.00 30,990 343 Lawrenceville GA D $4.20 2007 29,258 344 Lithonia GA 2005 1,924 345 Locust Grove GA E 2,768 2008 2,322 346 Loganville GA E 3,000 $4.00 5,435

22 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 347 McDonough GA E 3,000 $3.30 8,493 $500,000 348 Norcross GA IA $4.13 8,410 349 Peachtree City GA E 4,600 $3.95 31,580 350 Perry GA F $2.00 2012 14,215 351 Pine Lake GA 730 352 Powder Springs GA E 2,840 $3.79 2012 13,940 353 Richmond Hill GA E 3,300 $4.75 2015 10,919 354 Rockdale County GA E 3,420 $3.39 2005 70,111 355 Roswell GA T $3.95 79,334 356 Senoia GA E 4,400 $5.00 2016 3,751 357 Smyrna GA E 3,900 $2.45 2007 40,999 358 Snellville GA E 3,800 $3.10 2008 19,983 359 Statesboro GA E 3,200 $3.95 2015 30 360 Stockbridge GA E 2,000 $2.92 2004 9,853 $466,000 361 Stone Mountain GA E 3,000 7,145 362 Sugar Hill GA IA $4.50 2008 16,725 363 Union City GA E 2,800 $4.00 2013 20,501 $734,301 364 Valdosta GA E 3,704 $3.50 2006 43,724 365 Warner Robbins GA E 3,000 $4.25 2008 48,804 366 Woodstock GA E 2,700 $4.20 2006 10,050 367 Ackley IA F $3.00 1,665 368 Adel IA E 3,000 $3.40 4,563 369 Alburnett IA F $1.50 2012 673 370 Algona IA T $3.00 5,741 371 Altoona IA E 4,000 $5.00 2010 10,345 372 Ames IA T $4.95 1994 50,731 373 Ankeny IA E 4,000 $5.50 45,582 374 Asbury IA F $4.00 4,357 375 Atlantic IA E 2000 $2.85 6,937

23 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 376 Aurelia IA F $1.00 1,036 377 Avoca IA E $2.50 1,506 378 Belle Plaine IA F $3.56 2,537 379 Bellevue IA F $5.00 2,191 380 Belmond IA F $4.00 2009 2,376 381 Bettendorf IA E 2,500 $2.70 2003 32,445 $1,666,279 382 Bondurant IA E 2,450 $3.25 2010 3,860 383 Boone IA E 3,000 $2.00 12,633 384 Brooklyn IA F $2.00 1,468 385 Buffalo IA F $1.00 1,270 386 Burlington IA E 3,360 $2.58 26,839 $455,000 387 Carroll IA E 2,500 $3.00 10,103 388 Cedar Falls IA F $3.00 2006 36,145 $800,000 389 Cedar Rapids IA E 4,356 $5.48 126,326 390 Centerville IA F $3.00 2008 5,513 $70,000 391 Charles City IA F $5.00 2008 7,812 392 Cherokee IA F $3.00 2004 5,369 393 Clarinda IA F $2.00 2006 5,690 394 Clarion IA T 2011 2,850 395 Clear Lake IA D $2.42 8,161 396 Clive IA E 3,667 $7.83 2005 15,000 397 Conrad IA F $4.00 2008 1,108 398 Coon Rapids IA T $3.47 1,305 399 Coralville IA E 3,440 $3.00 2005 18,907 400 Creston IA V 7,597 401 Dallas Center IA F $4.00 1,623 402 Davenport IA E 2,600 $2.72 2004 98,359 $2,500,000 403 Decorah IA T $3.00 2016 7,957 404 Deloit IA V 264

24 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 405 Des Moines IA E 2,349 $12.68 1995 206,599 $13,763,000 406 DeWitt IA T $2.75 5,049 407 Dubuque IA E 2,917 $6.81 2003 57,686 408 Elkhart IA D $2.21 691 409 Ely IA F $2.00 1,766 410 Farnhamville IA V 420 411 Forest City IA F $5.00 4,362 412 Fort Dodge IA E 2,533 $3.00 2007 26,309 $500,000 413 Garnavillo IA T 745 414 Garner IA V $3.95 2,922 415 Grimes IA A $5.25 2012 8,378 $320,000 416 Grinnell IA E 3250 $3.26 9,218 417 Grundy Center IA D $3.00 2,706 418 Guttenberg IA F $1.50 2010 1,987 419 Hancock IA V 207 420 Hiawatha IA F $1.50 2000 6,694 421 Hills IA V 703 422 Hillsboro IA V 205 423 Indianola IA E 3,400 $2.00 2011 12,998 424 Iowa City IA D $4.50 2004 67,831 425 Johnston IA E 4,000 $5.55 2012 17,278 426 Kalona IA F $3.00 2010 2,363 $40,000 427 Kelley IA T 300 428 Lake City IA F $1.00 2005 1,727 429 Lake Mills IA T $3.00 2,100 430 Laurens IA T $3.00 1,258 431 Le Mars IA D $7.00 2008 9,826 432 Mallard IA V 298 433 Mapleton IA V 1,224

25 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 434 Marengo IA F $1.50 2,535 435 Marion IA E 2,791 $3.50 2,011 $339,000 436 Marshalltown IA F $2.16 26,009 437 Mason City IA F $1.00 29,172 438 McGregor IA F $8.50 871 439 Milford IA F $3.00 2012 2,954 440 Nevada IA F $5.25 6,658 441 North Liberty IA F $2.00 15,000 442 Norwalk IA F $7.50 8,821 443 Odebolt IA F $1.00 2004 1,153 444 Ogden IA F $3.00 2,044 445 Olin IA F $1.00 698 446 Oskaloosa IA E 2,750 $2.00 2007 10,938 $250,000 447 Perry IA F $3.00 2004 7,633 448 Pleasant Hill IA E 3,500 $3.00 9,082 449 Postville IA F $2.50 2007 2,273 450 Princeton IA 2015 886 451 Reinbeck IA T $2.00 2008 1,751 452 Ringsted IA V 422 453 Rock Valley IA V 2015 3,345 454 Rolfe IA D $3.00 2012 584 455 Sac City IA F $3.00 2,368 456 Sergeant Bluff IA R $2.15 4,326 $183,782 457 Sioux Center IA T $2.00 2007 6,327 458 Sioux City IA F $3.50 1990 85,013 459 Slater IA D $3.00 1,306 460 Solon IA F $0.50 2,173 461 State Center IA T $5.08 1,349 462 Storm Lake IA E 2,750 $4.00 10,076

26 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 463 Urbandale IA E 3,200 $6.00 2010 40,311 $500,000 464 Victor IA V 952 465 Waterloo IA F $2.75 2009 68,406 $1,720,000 466 Waukee IA E 2,973 $4.25 2006 5,126 467 Wellman IA F $4.75 2012 1,408 468 West Branch IA E 3,500 $2.25 2,326 $90,000 469 West Des Moines IA E 4,000 $4.25 46,403 470 Windsor Heights IA D $5.50 4,805 471 Woodward IA F $3.00 1,200 472 Wyoming IA F $1.00 515 473 Coeur D'Alene ID E 3,000 $4.00 2004 34,514 474 Lewiston ID - 2008 31,794 $700,000 475 Nampa ID - 2010 51,867 476 Pocatello ID - 51,466 477 Arlington Heights IL T $6.25 75,525 $1,630,000 478 Aurora IL F $10.46 1998 170,617 $3,000,000 479 Bloomington IL T 2004 70,970 $2,760,000 480 Buffalo Grove IL A $5.08 2016 $1,265,876 481 Champaign IL T $5.24 2012 81,055 $3,200,000 482 Decatur IL E 4,500 $3.67 2014 75,407 483 Downer's Grove IL T $11.43 2012 48,163 $3,500,000 484 East Moline IL T $2.61 2009 20,333 $350,000 485 Eureka IL E 3,250 $6.00 2015 5,295 486 Freeport IL T 25,638 $600,000 487 Highland Park IL E 2,765 $8.00 31,614 488 Hoffman Estates IL T $2.00 2013 51,895 489 Matteson IL D $7.00 2013 19,147 490 Moline IL T $11.24 2000 42,916 $1,800,000 491 Morton IL E 3,300 $4.88 2005 15,757 $900,000

27 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 492 Normal IL E 3,200 $4.60 2006 45,386 $1,730,000 493 Northbrook IL W $1.00 33,170 $1,200,000 494 Palatine IL F $6.13 2012 495 Park Ridge IL E 2,800 $2.75 2016 37,480 496 Peoria IL E 2,600 $7.80 2017 114,265 $4,600,000 497 Rantoul IL F $3.43 2001 12,857 $572,250 498 Richton Park IL D $5.97 12,533 $500,000 499 Rock Island IL T $4.03 2002 39,020 $1,600,000 500 Rolling Meadows IL E 3,604 $4.76 2001 23,682 $560,000 501 Tinley Park IL W $3.72 1983 56,703 $475,000 502 Urbana IL E 3,100 $4.94 2012 41,250 $1,141,000 503 Wheeling IL E 3,000 $2.00 2015 37,648 504 Winetka IL E 3,400 $21.83 2014 12,370 505 Albany IN F $10.64 2,368 $190,637 506 Anderson IN E 2,500 $3.50 2002 59,734 $2,106,667 507 Angola IN F $2.08 7,344 $167,623 508 Avon IN E $6.00 2017 16,960 509 Bargersville IN E 2,350 $9.46 2005 2,120 $258,301 510 Batesville IN T $2.00 2005 6,033 $76,721 511 Beech Grove IN E 2,620 2006 14,192 512 Berne IN T $24.00 4,114 $569,207 513 Bloomington IN R $5.95 1998 69,291 $1,362,231 514 Brownsburg IN E 2,900 $5.00 2006 14,520 $1,249,094 515 Carmel IN E 4,150 $5.57 2013 85,927 516 Cedar Lake IN E 2,903 $5.00 2006 9,279 $398,249 517 Centerville IN E 3,536 $8.50 2004 2,624 518 Chandler IN F $4.00 2004 3,500 $105,367 519 Chesterton IN D $6.83 11,139 $444,694 520 Cicero IN V 4,303 $88,649

28 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 521 Clark County IN F $3.33 2014 522 Clarksville IN E 2,527 $2.95 2004 21,400 $1,017,246 523 Connersville IN E 2,662 $5.15 15,411 $799,615 524 Crawfordsville IN D $6.00 15,243 $480,544 525 Crothersville IN F $3.00 2016 1,591 $25,000 526 Crown Point IN D $6.00 19,806 $1,037,243 527 Cumberland IN F $5.20 2007 5,500 $185,259 528 Danville IN E 3,700 6,418 $354,634 529 Delaware County IN T $0.95 48,682 $238,851 530 Dyer IN E 4,343 $6.00 1991 13,895 $1,037,243 531 Elkhart County IN E 3,600 $1.25 2,008 $96,421 532 Farmersburg IN V 1,107 $27,746 533 Fishers IN E 3,318 $4.95 79,127 534 Floyd County IN E 3,700 $3.25 2007 70,823 $1,072,563 535 Fort Wayne IN E 2,500 $5.15 255,824 $10,588,133 536 Fortville IN D $8.00 3,444 $277,648 537 Franklin IN T $5.00 2009 23,712 $523,292 538 Gary IN LU $5.00 2011 80,294 539 Goshen IN E 2,800 $1.25 29,383 $344,964 540 Greendale IN E 3,000 $4.39 4,296 541 Greenfield IN E 2,250 $2.00 2005 14,600 $864,647 542 Greenwood IN E 2,800 $5.00 2012 51,584 $733,756 543 Griffith IN E 2,200 $5.27 2005 17,334 $95,270 544 Highland IN T $8.69 64,322 545 Howard County IN T $7.50 84,964 $658,266 546 Indianapolis/Marion County IN IA $3.90 2001 791,926 $23,515,488 547 Jasper IN E 5,000 $3.96 2003 12,100 $354,228 548 Jeffersonville IN E 2,500 $3.50 27,362 $1,344,891 549 Lafayette IN E 3,200 $5.00 2009 56,397 $80,626

29 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 550 Lake County IN F $3.30 484,564 $8,837 551 Lake Station IN F $8.33 12,572 $542,202 552 Lebanon IN E 3,000 $4.75 15,259 $835,133 553 Leo Cedarville IN V $6.30 2,782 $127,883 554 Logansport IN T $12.49 19,684 $1,033,289 555 Marion IN E 2,521 $5.00 2001 31,320 $1,030,244 556 McCordsville IN E 2,250 $7.50 2005 1,134 $208,104 557 Merrillville IN LU $5.00 2009 32,147 $59,414 558 Middletown IN D $8.25 2,357 $98,361 559 Monroe County IN E 5,200 $2.93 2011 137,974 $1,562,127 560 Muncie IN V $9.00 2005 70,087 $4,290,127 561 Munster IN F $14.76 22,346 562 New Albany IN E 2,500 $4.17 2005 37,603 $1,457,574 563 New Castle IN F $6.00 17,780 $572,455 564 New Haven IN E 2,534 $5.35 12,406 $914,955 565 North Manchester IN E 2,650 $3.45 1994 5,932 $209,178 566 Ossian IN T $8.00 2005 2,943 $167,296 567 Peru IN E 3,497 $4.00 12,994 $373,118 568 Pittsboro IN F $3.50 1,588 $57,847 569 Plainfield IN E 3,000 $8.34 18,396 570 Plymouth IN T $2.05 9,840 $172,728 571 Portage IN E 3,500 $12.00 2009 36,828 572 Porter County IN $10.00 2016 164,343 $3,400,000 573 Richmond IN D $6.00 39,124 $1,459,275 574 Seymour IN E 2,840 $4.00 575 Shelbyville IN F $6.00 17,951 $825,437 576 South Bend IN D $2.00 2019 102,245 $1,000,000 577 Southport IN E 4,440 $6.00 2016 1,763 $74,585 578 Valparaiso IN T $12.50 1998 27,428 $2,299,346

30 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 579 Vincennes IN E 2,800 $3.00 18,701 $644,726 580 Wabash IN E 3,675 10,666 581 Warrick County IN E 3,100 $5.00 2006 52,383 $1,293,987 582 Warsaw IN E 3,550 $2.95 583 Washington IN E 2,558 $4.25 2004 11,380 $414,686 584 West Layfayette IN E 3,200 $8.00 2013 30,419 585 Westfield IN T $4.16 2008 9,293 $414,686 586 Whiteland IN E 3,704 $7.50 2010 4,169 $210,924 587 Winfield IN E 4,343 $6.00 2010 4,530 $203,663 588 Yorktown IN E 2,500 $2.00 4,785 $41,517 589 Zionsville IN E 4,400 $3.86 2010 24,159 $620,783 590 Abilene KS T $3.25 1999 6,844 591 Andover KS T $2.00 2005 6,698 $101,368 592 Arkansas City KS D $3.00 1993 11,963 $192,000 593 Bonner Springs KS D $3.00 7,093 $90,000 594 Caldwell KS D $1.00 1,043 595 Coffeyville KS D $7.00 2006 10,387 $160,000 596 Derby KS E 2,233 $3.00 2012 22,158 $550,830 597 Dodge City KS T $1.28 2009 25,176 598 El Dorado KS E 2,314 $3.00 2008 12,057 599 Eudora KS F $3.25 2007 4,307 600 Fairway KS E 3,200 $5.00 3,952 601 Garden City KS T $1.50 26,658 602 Hays KS E 3,369 $3.62 2011 20,013 603 Hiawatha KS D $4.00 2009 3,417 604 Hutchinson KS T $4.75 40,787 $282,500 605 Junction City KS T $5.00 18,886 606 Kansas City KS F $3.85 146,453 607 Lawrence KS E 2,366 $4.37 1997 80,098 $3,014,086

31 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 608 Leavenworth KS T $7.00 2018 36,210 609 Lenexa KS E 2,750 $9.08 2000 40,238 $4,802,460 610 Manhattan KS T $5.34 1992 44,831 611 McPhereson KS E $7.00 13,155 $866,000 612 Mission KS E 2,600 $19.00 2004 9,727 $2,080,000 613 Mission Hills KS - 2012 3,498 $500,000 614 Olathe KS A $5.77 114,662 $3,511,290 615 Ottawa KS E 2,600 $4.00 2012 12,620 616 Overland Park KS E 2,485 $2.00 2001 149,080 $3,200,000 617 Paola KS F $3.00 5,602 618 Parsons KS D $3.50 2008 11,514 $154,503 619 Pittsburg KS E 3,106 $3.86 2003 19,243 $750,000 620 Prairie Village KS IA $10.00 2008 21,447 $1,532,627 621 Shawnee KS E 2,773 $6.00 2004 64,680 $1,600,000 622 Topeka KS T $4.75 1996 122,377 623 Valley Center KS T $5.50 2008 4,883 624 Wamego KS D $5.50 625 Westwood KS V $6.00 2013 1,658 626 Wichita KS E 2,139 $2.00 344,284 $5,515,000 627 Winfield KS D $2.00 1991 11,900 628 Danville KY E 3,813 $3.36 2007 15,385 629 Glasgow KY T $2.00 2012 14,059 $493,000 630 Henderson KY E 3,000 $5.00 1998 27,373 631 Hopkinsville KY E 3,350 $3.00 2006 30,089 $1,108,128 632 Lexington/Fayette County KY E 2,500 $4.90 2009 260,512 633 Louisville/Jefferson Co. KY E 2,500 $10.58 1987 693,604 $17,100,000 634 Murray KY D $1.50 2004 14,950 635 Oldham County KY E 6,000 $3.91 2008 40,502 $750,000 636 Radcliff KY E 2,800 $5.26 2003 21,961 $770,000

32 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 637 Sanitation District 1 KY E 2,600 $5.04 2003 290,000 $13,500,000 638 Warren County KY D $4.00 2007 43,226 $1,000,000 639 Braintree MA E 2,780 $2.08 35,744 $630,000 640 Canton MA $7.00 641 Chelmsford MA T $3.33 2017 33,802 $2,000,000 642 Chicopee MA E 2,000 $8.33 1998 54,653 $1,000,000 643 Fall River MA E 2,800 $13.33 2008 91,938 $4,660,000 644 Gloucester MA F $4.42 2011 30,273 645 Milton MA T $5.08 2016 27,003 $705,000 646 Newton MA T $6.25 2006 83,829 $575,000 647 Northampton MA T $7.59 2014 28,592 $1,980,056 648 Reading MA D $3.33 2006 24,145 $357,000 649 Shrewsbury MA T $7.50 2019 37,387 650 Westfield MA F 2010 41,094 $600,000 651 Yarmouth MA 23,793 652 Annapolis MD T $3.33 2003 35,838 653 Anne Arundel County MD T 2013 544,403 654 Baltimore MD E 1,050 $10.00 2013 619,493 655 Baltimore County MD - 2013 809,641 656 Berlin MD D $4.16 2013 4,491 $570,000 657 Centreville MD E 3,200 $2.50 2013 4,334 658 Charles County MD F $5.08 120,546 659 Frederick MD E 1,000 $1.25 2013 660 Frederick County MD F $0.01 2013 236,745 $483 661 Gaithersburg MD IA $11.22 2015 662 Harford County MD D $7.00 2013 246,849 $1,065,725 663 Howard County MD E 3,000 $7.50 2013 293,142 $18,000,000 664 Montgomery County MD E 2,406 $8.69 2002 873,341 665 Prince George's County MD E 2,465 $3.46 2013 871,233 $92,307,692

33 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 666 Rockville MD E 2,330 $11.00 2007 47,388 $2,200,000 667 Salisbury MD E 3,344 $1.67 2014 31,507 $598,500 668 Silver Spring MD - 76,540 669 Takoma Park MD E 1,228 $7.67 1996 17,299 $200,000 670 Augusta ME E 2,700 $7.54 18,560 671 Bangor ME E 3,000 $1.83 2012 33,011 672 Lewiston ME D $5.00 2006 35,690 673 Long Creek Watershed ME D $6.89 2010 $1,400,000 674 Portland ME E 1,200 $6.30 675 Adrian MI - 2012 21,122 676 Ann Arbor MI T $16.01 1980 114,024 $5,300,000 677 Berkley MI E 2,600 $5.18 2001 15,531 678 Birmingham MI E 4,317 $3.98 2017 21,007 679 Chelsea MI A 680 Detroit MI A $29.85 1979 951,270 681 Jackson MI - 2011 36,316 $800,000 682 Lansing MI V 1995 119,128 683 Marquette MI T 19,661 684 New Baltimore MI D $2.00 2005 7,405 685 Albert Lea MN V 2005 17,967 686 Albertville MN V 7,044 $209,418 687 Alexandria MN T $4.50 2005 8,820 688 Andover MN R 2003 30,222 $358,708 689 Annandale MN D $3.25 3,228 $27,046 690 Anoka MN R $3.90 2003 18,076 $419,839 691 Apple Valley MN R $6.52 1988 45,527 $1,370,348 692 Arden Hills MN R $4.49 1993 9,642 $532,531 693 Ashby MN R 2005 444 $11,135 694 Austin MN A $4.00 2003 24,834 $423,091

34 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 695 Barnesville MN F $2.61 2,563 $29,081 696 Baxter MN IA $2.63 2006 7,642 $243,100 697 Belle Plaine MN F $3.56 1999 6,792 698 Bemidji MN T $6.44 13,657 $1,086,338 699 Big Lake MN R $4.93 10,060 $198,040 700 Bird Island MN F $5.00 2007 1,027 $31,106 701 Blaine MN R $2.67 2007 57,584 $866,961 702 Blooming Prairie MN V 1,996 $22,224 703 Bloomington MN R $7.29 1988 84,057 $4,373,221 704 Brainerd MN R 2002 13,646 705 Brooklyn Center MN R $5.02 1991 30,529 $1,620,970 706 Brooklyn Park MN R $14.38 2002 76,853 $1,113,433 707 Browerville MN F $6.00 788 $19,633 708 Buffalo MN R 1986 15,665 709 Burnsville MN R $6.99 2012 60,828 $3,966,430 710 Byron MN R 2008 711 Cambridge MN R 2000 8,209 $285,593 712 Canby MN V 1,795 $121,304 713 Cannon Falls MN R 2009 4,086 $186,000 714 Carver MN T 2004 3,790 $127,389 715 Centerville MN A $4.33 1997 3,818 $75,719 716 Champlin MN R $2.50 2008 23,418 $585,580 717 Chanhassen MN T $4.96 2007 23,358 $571,288 718 Chaska MN R $9.79 23,770 $504,604 719 Chokio MN V 400 $30,907 720 Circle Pines MN F $6.00 2005 4,953 $123,546 721 Clarks Grove MN V 706 $4,690 722 Cloquet MN E 4,312 $4.00 2011 12,148 $245,170 723 Cologne MN V 2005 1,519 $19,310

35 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 724 Columbia Heights MN R 1999 19,632 $349,964 725 Coon Rapids MN R $3.47 2002 61,904 $1,358,007 726 Cottage Grove MN R $5.00 2001 35,052 727 Crosby MN R 2,386 $47,248 728 Crystal MN R $19.15 1991 22,463 $656,761 729 Dassel MN LU $2.00 2001 1,467 $13,680 730 Deephaven MN F $5.00 1994 3,693 $84,993 731 Delano MN R 5,541 732 Detroit Lakes MN R 8,641 733 Duluth MN E 1,708 $6.75 1998 86,227 $4,632,541 734 Dundas MN R 1,371 $3,254 735 Eagan MN R 1990 64,765 $1,319,530 736 East Grand Forks MN R 8,601 $213,691 737 Eden Prairie MN LU $15.10 1993 61,657 $1,054,077 738 Edina MN R $11.60 1985 48,620 739 Elko-New Market MN R $8.97 2000 4,194 $123,976 740 Excelsior MN R $38.10 1999 2,219 $127,402 741 Eyota MN F $2.00 1,998 $17,586 742 Fairfax MN R $12.50 1995 1,218 $106,097 743 Fairmont MN R 1987 10,589 $611,391 744 Falcon Heights MN R $7.33 1986 5,381 $123,585 745 Faribault MN E 3,500 $3.80 2001 23,450 $573,375 746 Farmington MN R $7.08 1989 21,267 $468,063 747 Fergus Falls MN T $7.25 1997 13,125 $388,292 748 Forest Lake MN R $3.33 2008 18,619 749 Frazee MN R 2005 1,360 750 Fridley MN R $3.19 1985 27,398 $431,401 751 Gaylord MN R 2,275 $159,095 752 Glencoe MN R 1993 5,598 $114,560

36 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 753 Glyndon MN F $9.50 2007 1,413 $58,039 754 Golden Valley MN T $8.00 1992 20,655 $2,321,983 755 Grand Rapids MN T $7.50 2004 10,862 $507,541 756 Hamburg MN D $27.00 513 $15,902 757 Hanover MN R $8.50 2,980 $53,710 758 Harmony MN D $1.00 2009 1,020 $9,642 759 Hastings MN R $6.20 2010 22,359 $432,761 760 Hopkins MN R $5.00 1989 17,837 $805,251 761 Hutchinson MN R 2001 14,093 $569,336 762 Inver Grove Heights MN R $8.03 2007 34,157 763 Jordan MN R $6.16 1995 5,583 $175,900 764 Kasson MN R 5,978 $164,053 765 Kenyon MN D $3.50 1,817 $27,895 766 Lake City MN V 5,063 $81,958 767 Lake Elmo MN T 2003 8,177 $218,146 768 Lakeville MN R $4.79 1994 56,443 $662,863 769 Lamberton MN D $10.67 824 $14,468 770 Lauderdale MN R 1994 2,408 $56,439 771 Le Seuer MN R 2017 4,058 772 Lexington MN D $2.50 2,049 $13,615 773 Lilydale MN V 623 $28,078 774 Lindstrom MN V 4,442 $46,847 775 Little Falls MN R 8,349 $76,939 776 Long Lake MN R 1999 1,792 $90,916 777 Loretto MN R $15.00 2003 658 $42,772 778 Luverne MN R $45.00 4,745 $86,745 779 Madison MN R $11.25 2002 1,540 $130,152 780 Mahnomen MN R 5,413 $2,895 781 Mahtomedi MN R $9.38 2001 7,775

37 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 782 Mankato MN A $4.76 39,528 $1,269,232 783 Mantorville MN V 1,971 $16,435 784 Maple Lake MN D $1.15 2,088 $13,807 785 Maple Plain MN T $2.97 2005 1,792 $98,470 786 Mapleton MN V 1,756 $25,693 787 Maplewood MN R $7.48 2003 38,472 788 Marshall MN R 2003 13,700 $977,357 789 Mayer MN D $4.00 2005 1,780 $18,857 790 Medina MN R $2.53 2008 4,963 $205,150 791 Mendota Heights MN A $2.42 1992 11,168 $276,602 792 Minneapolis MN E 1,530 $13.09 2005 387,753 $39,038,000 793 Minnetonka MN A $7.08 2003 50,435 $2,026,316 794 Minnetonka Beach MN F $5.00 2011 539 795 Minnetrista MN F $8.67 2004 6,474 $99,089 796 Montrose MN F $4.50 2000 2,887 $43,980 797 Moorhead MN F $10.21 2005 38,566 $2,065,908 798 Mora MN F $1.25 2005 3,556 799 Mound MN R $1.00 2001 9,180 $255,633 800 Mounds View MN T 1993 12,305 $289,619 801 New Brighton MN R $4.58 1994 21,715 $702,237 802 New Hope MN D $7.96 1991 20,616 $1,186,073 803 New Prague MN R $15.53 1992 7,401 $200,490 804 Newport MN R $4.08 3,481 $19,473 805 North Branch MN R 2008 10,131 $311,436 806 North Mankato MN A $3.75 13,437 $326,086 807 North Saint Paul MN T $10.56 1990 11,601 $694,559 808 Northfield MN R 1986 20,084 $576,867 809 Norwood Young America MN R 2003 3,611 $66,855 810 Oak Park Heights MN T 1999 4,389 $79,934

38 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 811 Oakdale MN R $2.17 2002 27,743 812 Olivia MN T $15.67 2,449 $151,555 813 Orono MN R $8.11 2001 7,543 $252,706 814 Ortonville MN D $2.00 1,916 $13,554 815 Osakis MN T 1,746 816 Osseo MN R $11.14 2007 2,463 $50,687 817 Otsego MN T 2009 13,761 $72,081 818 Owatonna MN R $4.35 1998 25,599 $339,905 819 Park Rapids MN R 2010 3,686 $28,777 820 Pierz MN R $32.92 1,394 $38,771 821 Plymouth MN R $6.86 2001 71,561 822 Preston MN V 2001 1,325 $61,127 823 Princeton MN R $1.89 2008 4,676 $119,019 824 Prior Lake MN R $15.06 1993 25,282 $845,000 825 Ramsey MN R $4.92 2000 18,510 $652,996 826 Red Wing MN R 16,116 $557,890 827 Redwood Falls MN R $8.24 2003 5,459 $211,290 828 Richfield MN R $6.34 1985 34,439 $1,662,530 829 Robbinsdale MN R $10.80 1985 14,123 $765,602 830 Rochester MN R $9.29 2003 85,806 $4,786,160 831 Rogers MN T $4.10 2002 3,588 $313,554 832 Rosemount MN T $6.12 1992 14,619 $987,051 833 Roseville MN R $4.12 1984 33,690 $928,157 834 Saint Anthony MN R $21.84 1993 8,226 835 Saint Bonifacius MN F $6.50 2004 1,873 $47,949 836 Saint Charles MN T 2006 3,735 $82,853 837 Saint Cloud MN R 2003 59,107 $1,080,700 838 Saint Joseph MN R $3.00 6,646 $100,093 839 Saint Louis Park MN R $7.94 2000 44,126 $1,852,729

39 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 840 Saint Michael MN R 2003 9,099 $142,532 841 Saint Paul MN R $7.89 1986 287,151 842 Saint Paul Park MN R $3.00 2007 5,070 843 Saint Peter MN A $7.50 2004 9,747 $700,000 844 Sandstone MN R 2008 2,849 $37,803 845 Sartell MN D $6.00 14,445 $242,440 846 Sauk Rapids MN R 2010 11,957 $174,549 847 Savage MN R 1994 27,292 $1,485,082 848 Shafer MN R 2003 383 $7,388 849 Shakopee MN R 1985 20,568 $995,855 850 Shoreview MN R $10.40 1991 25,924 $937,550 851 Shorewood MN R $9.87 1993 7,400 $209,432 852 South Saint Paul MN R 2010 20,167 $367,102 853 South Washington Watershed District MN F $7.41 2010 $3,475,949 854 Spring Valley MN F $5.00 2,479 $79,536 855 Stacy MN R $3.50 2003 1,456 $26,927 856 Starbuck MN V 1,302 $36,497 857 Stewart MN V 571 $93,308 858 Stewartville MN R $4.40 2001 5,916 $71,101 859 Stillwater MN R 1996 15,143 $493,807 860 Taylors Falls MN R $1.50 2003 976 $10,519 861 Thief River Falls MN R $3.00 8,410 $160,843 862 Tonka Bay MN R $3.50 1993 1,547 $24,164 863 Truman MN V 1,115 $25,392 864 Twin Valley MN D $4.50 821 $25,528 865 Two Harbors MN E 1,718 $2.00 1999 3,613 $135,091 866 Vadnais Heights MN R 1992 12,525 $405,000 Vadnais Lake Water Management 867 Organization MN F $2.20 2007

40 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 868 Victoria MN R $7.67 1997 4,025 $118,930 869 Waconia MN F $12.65 1992 6,814 $537,376 870 Walker MN V 941 $2,574 871 Walnut Grove MN V 871 $63,315 872 Watertown MN F $3.00 1993 3,029 $51,597 873 Waverly MN D $4.00 2003 1,089 $28,665 874 Wayzata MN R $5.55 1991 4,113 $226,226 875 West Concord MN V 782 $26,111 876 West Saint Paul MN R $3.08 2005 19,405 $355,200 877 White Bear Township MN E 4,000 $7.00 1992 11,293 878 Winnebago MN V 1,437 $28,593 879 Winona MN R 2003 27,069 $298,051 880 Woodbury MN F $6.43 1992 46,463 $1,719,000 881 Worthington MN R 2004 11,283 $497,442 882 Wyoming MN R $0.67 1997 7,716 $28,343 883 Arnold MO E 1,750 $3.00 2005 21,013 884 Columbia - Boone County MO T $2.25 1993 115,276 $33,970,000 885 Hannibal MO 2017 17,808 886 Kansas City MO E 500 $2.50 1992 463,202 887 Saint Louis MO A $0.24 2008 318,069 $41,840,000 888 Billings MT F $2.69 89,847 889 Bozeman MT M $2.68 2012 38,025 890 Great Falls MT F $5.71 1989 56,690 $1,735,000 891 Helena MT E 2,222 $1.48 1988 25,780 $1,421,000 892 Missoula MT D $0.75 2016 69,122 $250,000 893 Polson MT F $8.00 2009 4,041 894 Whitefish MT E 2,400 $16.67 2006 5,032 895 Archdale NC E 3,163 $5.00 11,415 $468,372 896 Asheville NC E 2,442 $4.86 2004 84,458 $3,131,235

41 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 897 Atlantic NC F $4.00 1,495 $161,890 898 Belmont NC E 2,500 $3.00 10,076 $384,138 899 Bessemer City NC F $2.07 5,398 $63,467 900 Burlington NC F $5.00 2005 44,917 $452,431 901 Butner NC F $2.50 7,598 902 Camden County NC E 4,500 2014 10,187 903 Carolina Beach NC E 2,000 $9.00 2002 4,701 $770,636 904 Carrboro NC E 2,800 $6.25 2017 21,265 905 Chapel Hill NC T $8.04 2004 48,715 $1,841,152 906 Charlotte NC T $10.77 1994 695,454 $48,589,000 907 Clemmons NC E 3,952 $5.00 1993 13,827 $765,500 908 Concord NC E 3,120 $5.16 2005 79,066 $3,730,742 909 Cornelius NC T $4.80 11,969 $370,000 910 Cramerton NC T 4,165 $71,246 911 Creedmoor NC T $8.92 2012 4,129 912 Cumberland County NC E 2,266 $1.00 1995 302,963 913 Dallas NC E 2,500 $3.10 3,402 914 Davidson NC T $10.73 7,139 $294,619 915 Durham NC T $6.75 1997 228,330 $10,892,409 916 Elizabeth City NC D $3.00 2006 18,683 $383,324 917 Elon NC F $2.00 9,419 918 Fayetteville NC E 2,266 $6.00 2004 200,564 $5,113,112 919 Forsythe County NC T $5.77 2006 306,067 920 Gastonia NC E 2,650 $3.25 2001 71,741 $2,042,697 921 Graham NC F $1.00 14,153 $59,510 922 Granville County NC T $1.50 2012 59,976 $235,000 923 Greensboro NC E 2,543 $2.70 1994 269,666 $9,941,103 924 Greenville NC T $10.70 84,554 $3,058,151 925 Hendersonville NC F $3.00 2018 13,840

42 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 926 High Point NC E 2,588 $2.00 104,371 $2,446,993 927 Hillsborough NC T $6.25 2016 6,087 928 Hope Mills NC D $4.00 2008 15,176 $421,656 929 Huntersville NC T $4.80 24,960 930 Indian Trail NC T $4.43 2007 11,905 $1,062,316 931 Jacksonville NC E 2,850 $5.00 2006 66,715 $2,068,443 932 Kannapolis NC T $7.25 36,910 $1,471,588 933 Kernersville NC E 2,980 $3.29 2006 23,123 $955,981 934 Kings Mountain NC E 2,000 $2.50 2014 10,791 935 Kinston NC E 3,059 $4.50 2008 22,346 936 Kure Beach NC F $8.71 2,012 $171,901 937 Lake Park NC T 3,422 $40,110 938 Landis NC D $5.00 3,121 $91,448 939 Lowell NC V 2,662 940 Lumberton NC T $4.25 1997 21,542 $852,594 941 Matthews NC T $6.32 22,127 942 Mecklenburg County NC T $2.68 695,454 943 Mint Hill NC T $4.80 14,922 944 Monroe NC T $4.50 2008 32,797 $1,793,744 945 Mooresville NC E 2,700 $3.40 2014 34,887 $1,222,784 946 Morrisville NC E 2,800 $1.92 2012 19,184 $550,000 947 Mount Holly NC E $2.50 13,656 $231,925 948 Nags Head NC F $2.00 2,757 $113,252 949 New Bern NC E 3,100 $2.10 2012 29,524 $800,000 950 Oak Island NC D $1.75 6,783 $257,310 951 Oxford NC E 2,500 $2.00 8,338 $135,000 952 Person County NC T $1.00 2013 $231,455 953 Pineville NC T $4.68 3,449 954 Plymouth NC F $3.00 3,878 $55,449

43 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 955 Raleigh NC T $5.00 2004 416,468 $15,333,385 956 Ranlo NC W $7.45 3,434 $57,903 957 Rocky Mount NC E 2,519 $5.00 2003 57,477 $3,352,106 958 Shelby NC E 2,600 $2.50 2014 20,325 959 Spring Lake NC D $2.75 11,964 $262,517 960 Stallings NC E 2,060 $2.12 2007 13,831 $227,489 961 Statesville NC E 3,050 $4.70 2019 26,506 $1,800,000 962 Stem NC T 463 963 Swansboro NC T $3.75 2016 2,993 964 Thomasville NC F $1.00 26,729 $131,845 965 Wallace NC E 2,400 $4.85 3,880 $97,281 966 Washington NC T $5.50 2002 9,744 $511,353 967 Whitakers NC F $3.25 744 968 Wilmington NC E 2,500 $8.19 2004 106,476 $7,040,417 969 Wilson NC E 2,585 $4.50 2002 49,167 $2,412,522 970 Winston-Salem NC T $4.50 185,776 $10,108,165 971 Winterville NC E 2,000 $2.00 2007 9,269 $2,154 972 Wrightsville Beach NC T 2,593 973 Zebulon NC T $2.00 4,433 $97,489 974 Bismarck ND F $2.98 55,532 $638,000 975 Dickinson ND V 976 Grand Forks ND F $2.90 1988 49,321 977 Jamestown ND $3.00 2019 15,387 $500,000 978 Minot ND F $2.60 1998 36,567 979 Sante Fe NM T $3.00 2003 62,203 980 Carson City NV F $5.69 2003 52,457 $1,190,514 981 Sparks NV D $8.32 66,346 982 Washoe County NV E $9.31 2015 446,903 983 Ithaca NY E $4.75 2014 30,014

44 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 984 Ada OH T 2004 5,952 985 Amberley OH R 2003 3,585 986 Ashland OH E 3,052 $3.50 2006 20,367 987 Ashville OH E 2530 $3.00 2006 4,120 988 Avon OH E 4300 $2.00 2018 21,193 989 Barberton OH E 8,668 $5.00 2006 26,455 990 Bellefontaine OH E 2,400 $3.75 2001 13,322 991 Boardman OH E 4,764 $3.12 2018 35,376 $900,000 992 Broadview Heights OH E 4,000 $4.00 2007 19,247 993 Brunswick OH E 3,500 $4.95 2011 34,441 994 Buckeye Lake OH E 2,700 $4.00 2013 2,703 995 Bucyrus OH E 2,506 $7.20 2000 12,253 996 Butler County OH E 4,000 $1.08 2003 369,999 997 Campbell OH T $3.00 2007 8,235 998 Canal Winchester OH E 3,001 $3.00 2010 7,191 999 Canfield OH E 3,050 $3.12 1992 7,464 1000 Celina OH E 3,083 $2.00 2008 10,406 1001 Chillicothe OH F $1.00 1997 21,955 1002 Cincinnati OH T $8.05 1984 296,223 1003 Columbus OH E 2,000 $4.68 1994 797,434 1004 Cortland OH F $1.50 2007 7,069 1005 Coshocton OH D $0.25 2010 11,231 1006 Cuyahoga Falls OH E 3,000 $3.00 1992 49,473 $600,000 1007 Dayton OH F $5.03 1997 142,148 1008 Deerfield Regional Stormwater District OH E 3,407 $1.92 2006 1009 Delaware OH E 2,773 $2.50 1998 35,541 1010 Elyria OH E 2,700 $2.65 1011 Findlay OH T $3.00 1999 41,202 1012 Forest Park OH F $3.00 1988 19,463

45 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 1013 Fostoria OH R 2006 13,411 1014 Franklin OH E 2,611 $3.50 11,771 $469,218 1015 Gahanna OH E 3,064 $4.33 2004 32,636 1016 Galion OH E 2,650 $6.00 2001 10,416 1017 Gambier OH T $4.00 2,396 1018 Greenville OH E 2,800 $2.95 2007 13,189 1019 Groveport OH E 2,760 $2.00 2008 5,363 1020 Hamilton OH E 2,536 $4.30 2002 62,795 1021 Hamilton County OH V 800,362 1022 Harrison OH R $2.00 2007 9,871 1023 Hilliard OH E 2,000 $2.35 2009 28,435 $647,915 1024 Hubbard OH T $3.00 2007 8,284 1025 Huber Heights OH E 3,431 $2.00 2002 38,278 1026 Hudson OH - 22,182 1027 Ironton OH W $12.42 2005 11,211 1028 Kent OH E 1,963 $4.30 2001 28,935 1029 Lake County OH E 3,050 $3.50 2003 229,885 1030 Lancaster OH E 2,600 $7.64 2003 39,026 1031 Lebanon OH E 2,615 $3.50 2004 20,242 1032 Lexington OH E 5,000 $1.50 2004 4,784 1033 Lima OH E 2,600 38,693 1034 London OH E 2,766 $4.00 9,896 1035 Lorain County (unincorporated areas) OH E 6,000 $1.50 1036 Louisville OH T $3.50 2005 9,186 1037 Loveland OH E 2,500 $4.50 2003 12,082 1038 Lowellville OH F $2.00 2007 1,148 1039 Lucas County OH E 5,500 $4.31 2011 440,005 1040 Marion OH E 2,778 $4.16 1997 36,689 1041 Marysville OH E 2,700 $4.50 2004 22,288

46 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 1042 Mason OH F $4.32 2001 31,039 1043 Massillon OH T $1.00 2010 32,106 1044 Medina OH E 2,716 $2.25 2003 26,822 1045 Middletown OH E 2,814 $4.00 2005 48,962 1046 Milford OH E 2,400 $5.50 2004 6,768 1047 Monroe OH D $3.00 2003 12,509 1048 Monroeville OH E 4,200 2009 1,400 1049 Montpelier OH T 1986 4,067 1050 Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District OH E 3,300 $1.00 2,000,000 $12,600,000 1051 New Lexington OH F $2.25 2005 4,689 1052 New London OH T $4.00 2005 2,455 1053 Newark OH E 2,600 $6.50 2005 47,790 $2,728,438 1054 North Ridgeville OH E 3,820 $3.88 2018 33,436 1055 Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District OH E 3,000 $5.15 2010 1056 Northwood OH E 2,500 $3.16 2001 5,265 1057 Norwalk OH E 3,800 $1.35 2011 16,977 1058 Oak Harbor OH E 4,200 $13.00 2007 2,758 1059 Oakwood OH E $6.00 2013 $260,000 1060 Painesville OH E 2,500 $2.75 2002 19,549 1061 Pickerington OH E 2,530 $4.50 2001 18,408 1062 Piqua OH E 5,400 $5.70 2009 20,592 $70,000 1063 Poland OH E 2,500 $3.50 2010 2,537 1064 Ravenna OH E 2,750 $3.00 2007 11,739 1065 Reynoldsburg OH E 2,530 $2.00 1996 36,293 1066 Rittman OH 2015 6,593 1067 Sebring OH D $4.50 4,391 1068 Sheffield OH E 2,500 $3.50 2004 3,986 1069 Sheffield Lake OH E 2,275 $4.85 1999 9,145 1070 Sidney OH E 2,752 $1.95 1994 21,178

47 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 1071 Silver Lake OH F $3.00 2003 2,510 1072 Spencerville OH V 2008 2,218 1073 Springboro OH D $3.00 2003 17,588 1074 Springfield OH E 1,898 $2.25 2011 60,333 1075 Stow OH E 3,060 $3.00 34,711 1076 Struthers OH E 3,500 $3.50 2007 10,640 1077 Tallmadge OH E 3,000 $2.00 17,473 1078 Toledo OH E 2,500 $3.80 1999 286,038 1079 Trenton OH E 3,000 $0.30 2003 11,931 1080 Trotwood OH E 4,020 $4.00 2,455 1081 Troy OH E 3,000 $4.65 2007 25,143 $72,000 1082 Trumbell County OH - 2016 206,443 1083 Union OH T $4.00 1987 6,448 1084 Upper Arlington OH F $3.75 1991 34,223 1085 Urbana OH W $5.00 2017 14,239 1086 Vandalia OH E 4,431 $2.30 2004 15,317 1087 Wadsworth OH E 3,500 $4.50 2005 21,683 1088 Wapakoneta OH T 1994 9,843 1089 Warren OH E 648 $2.92 41,358 1090 Wellington OH E 2,900 $3.50 2010 4,806 1091 Wooster OH E 3,050 $5.75 1985 26,139 1092 Wyoming OH V general fund 2011 8,398 1093 Xenia OH T $2.50 25,925 $340,317 1094 Zanesville OH E 2,300 $3.00 1987 25,531 1095 Bixby OK E 2,650 $4.00 21,137 1096 Broken Arrow OK E 2,650 $6.86 2002 100,073 1097 Catoosa OK D $2.50 7,226 1098 Chickasha OK $7.00 2016 16,374 1099 Choctaw OK F $3.00 2005 11,364

48 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 1100 Edmond OK E 4,860 $3.00 1994 82,963 1101 Enid OK E 5,000 $4.79 2009 49,451 1102 Jenks OK F $2.00 2002 17,130 1103 Lawton OK F $0.75 98,177 1104 McAlester OK E 2,650 $2.00 2016 18,301 1105 Miami OK E $2.00 13,577 1106 Midwest City OK W $2.42 55,427 1107 Muskogee OK D $2.37 2005 39,231 1108 Oklahoma City OK M $5.53 1995 591,967 1109 Owasso OK E 3,000 $4.50 29,854 1110 Ponca City OK D $3.50 25,168 1111 Sand Springs OK E 2,650 $5.80 19,140 1112 Sapulpa OK D $4.15 20,691 1113 Stillwater OK E 5,000 $1.00 1997 46,048 1114 Tahlequah OK D $2.00 16,021 $10,000,000 1115 Tulsa OK E 2,650 $7.03 1986 396,466 1116 Woodward OK $3.00 2016 12,758 1117 Adair Village OR F $2.50 843 1118 Albany OR E 3,200 $5.28 2017 53,211 1119 Ashland OR T $4.90 1994 20,232 1120 Beaverton OR E 2,640 $10.78 1989 91,625 $1,500,000 1121 Bend OR E 3,800 $5.46 2007 77,905 1122 Cannon Beach OR F $4.49 1996 1,695 1123 Central Point OR E 3,000 $6.50 2005 17,308 $1,015,800 1124 Clackamas County OR E 2,500 $6.95 380,207 1125 Clatskanie OR D $2.50 1999 1,738 $1,725,000 1126 Corvallis OR E 2,750 $9.02 1977 54,674 1127 Cottage Grove OR E 2,650 $5.15 1998 9,734 $274,040 1128 Dundee OR D $1.67 1997 3,188 $125,000

49 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 1129 Estacada OR F $6.50 1998 2,725 $8,975,914 1130 Eugene OR T $15.00 1994 156,929 1131 Fairview OR IA $12.48 1994 8,920 1132 Florence OR IA $6.49 2005 8,466 1133 Forest Grove OR E 2,640 $7.75 1990 21,083 1134 Gladstone OR $10.00 2017 11,491 1135 Grants Pass OR E 3,700 $5.30 37,579 1136 Gresham OR E 2,500 $12.12 1994 105,594 1137 Hillsboro OR E 2,640 $9.06 70,186 1138 Hood River OR M $9.19 2006 7,167 1139 Hubbard OR F 3,173 1140 Independence OR E 3,250 $7.41 2011 8,650 1141 Jackson County OR E 3,000 2004 181,269 1142 Keizer OR E 3,000 $7.47 2007 32,203 1143 Lake Oswego OR E 3,030 $11.76 1992 35,278 $370,000 1144 Lebanon OR T $3.47 2010 12,950 1145 Marion County OR E 3,000 $4.55 330,700 1146 Medford OR E 3,730 $10.25 1994 63,154 1147 Milwaukie OR E 2,706 $25.22 1994 20,490 1148 Newberg OR E 2,877 $11.23 2003 18,064 1149 Newport OR F $8.25 9,968 1150 Ontario OR F $1.16 10,985 1151 Oregon City OR T $10.24 1993 25,754 1152 Philomath OR T $2.00 1999 3,838 1153 Portland OR T $10.39 1977 593,820 1154 Redmond OR F $7.87 2013 27,873 1155 Reedsport OR E 3,000 4,378 1156 Roseburg OR E 3,000 $5.50 21,790 $900,979 1157 Saint Helens OR E 2,500 $11.71 2003 12,905

50 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 1158 Salem OR T $5.04 2010 156,244 1159 Sandy OR E 2,750 $3.00 2001 9,677 1160 Scappoose OR E 2,750 $3.13 6,599 $150,000 1161 Sheridan OR E 3,000 $3.50 6,165 1162 Springfield OR T 59,695 $5,669,775 1163 Sweet Home OR E 3,200 $2.40 2007 9,035 1164 Talent OR F $1.41 2000 6,115 1165 Tigard OR E 2,640 $6.75 49,011 $2,408,916 1166 Troutdale OR E 2,700 $6.40 16,244 $231,038 1167 Tualatin OR E 2,640 $6.96 26,558 1168 Washington County OR E 2,640 $6.75 540,410 1169 West Linn OR E 2,914 $5.58 25,392 1170 Wilsonville OR E 2,750 $5.25 19,715 1171 Allentown PA E 500 $10.00 2018 120,207 1172 Borough of Carlisle PA E 2,410 $7.00 2017 19,259 1173 Borough of Dormont PA E $9.00 2015 8,593 1174 Borough of Greenville PA E 3,122.83 2016 5,860 1175 Chambersburg PA V $4.00 2015 20,508 1176 Chester PA E 1,139 $8.25 2017 33,972 1177 Clarion Borough PA T $9.00 2019 5,305 1178 Easton PA E 1,797 $6.75 2018 27,109 1179 Ebensburg PA E $8.00 2014 3,269 1180 Greencastle Borough PA 2019 4,026 $780,000 1181 Hampden Township PA E 3,534 $4.42 2015 28,044 1182 Hanover Borough PA E 2,250 $5.54 2019 15,607 1183 Highspire Borough PA D $7.00 2016 2,399 1184 Jonestown PA E 3,100 $6.67 2012 1,931 1185 Lancaster PA E 1,000 $7.74 2014 59,325 1186 Lower Allen Township PA E $6.33 2019 19,338

51 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 1187 Lower Paxton Township PA E 3,400 $10.67 2019 49,050 1188 Meadville PA E 2,660 $7.50 2012 13,616 $2,218,395 1189 Mount Lebanon PA E 2,400 $8.00 2011 33,137 1190 New Castle PA E 22,142 1191 North Fayette Township PA E $3.50 2018 13,934 $346,000 1192 North Lebanon Township PA E 3,755 $3.35 2018 11,429 $400,000 1193 Philadelphia PA F $13.48 1,536,471 $655,000 1194 Radnor Township PA T $4.83 31,531 1195 West Chester PA T $11.73 2016 18,461 1196 White Township PA E 3,700 $2.00 2015 15,821 1197 Wyoming Valley PA E 1,000 $5.10 2018 68,900 1198 Aiken County SC A $5.42 160,682 1199 Anderson SC F $4.00 2007 26,871 1200 Beaufort SC E 4,906 $11.25 12,534 $4,700,000 1201 Beaufort County SC E 4,906 $7.25 2005 164,684 1202 Berkeley County SC E 2,760 $4.00 2014 194,020 1203 Bluffton SC E 4,906 $8.17 2001 12,734 $6,336,000 1204 Charleston SC E 2,200 $10.00 1994 122,689 1205 Charleston County SC F $6.00 2006 235,015 $3,500,000 1206 Clemson SC D $4.00 2015 14,276 1207 Columbia SC E 2,454 $11.80 2002 130,591 $888,000 1208 Conway SC E 2,700 $5.25 2003 17,513 1209 Dorchester County SC E 3,735 $3.73 2002 140,892 $300,000 1210 Easley SC E 5,000 $2.00 2003 20,058 $300,000 1211 Florence SC E 2,500 $3.50 1981 37,326 1212 Folly Beach SC F $3.00 2007 2,675 1213 Fort Mill SC E 3,473 $6.00 1214 Georgetown SC M $2.00 1993 8,950 1215 Georgetown County SC E 3,770 $4.33 2007 55,797 $2,806,221

52 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 1216 Greenville SC E 2,389 $6.26 1995 56,002 1217 Greenville County SC D $1.85 402,000 1218 Greer SC E 2,500 $2.08 2002 16,843 1219 Hartsville SC F $4.00 2008 7,556 1220 Hilton Head Island SC E 4,906 $9.06 2001 33,862 $4,800,000 1221 Horry County SC E 5,000 $3.70 2000 196,629 1222 Isle of Palms SC R $6.00 2007 4,133 1223 Lancaster County SC F $6.25 2017 1224 Mount Pleasant SC D $5.00 47,609 1225 Myrtle Beach SC E 5,000 $6.25 1999 22,759 $511,500 1226 North Augusta SC T $5.00 2002 17,574 $317,687 1227 North Charleston SC E 2,900 $6.00 2003 79,641 $1,985,000 1228 North Myrtle Beach SC E 3,500 $8.00 2005 14,118 1229 Port Royal SC E 4,906 $4.17 10,790 1230 Rock Hill SC F $4.25 67,423 1231 Spartanburg SC E 2,000 $3.50 2010 37,334 1232 Sullivan's Island SC R 2007 1,911 1233 Summerville SC F $4.00 44,783 1234 Sumter SC D $2.50 2011 40,526 1235 Sumter County SC T $1.25 2010 107,460 $365,680 1236 Surfside Beach SC $6.83 2019 3,837 $400,000 1237 Tega Cay SC E 3,500 $9.00 7,773 1238 Aberdeen SD IA $0.86 2005 26,297 1239 Brookings SD V 1996 22,228 $5,000,000 1240 Rapid City SD LU $2.50 2013 67,956 1241 Sioux Falls SD V 1982 156,592 1242 Alcoa TN E 2,696 $4.00 2008 8,570 $5,000,000 1243 Bristol TN T $2.00 2014 26,626 $562,000 1244 Chattanooga TN E $10.54 1993 171,279 $445,126,902

53 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 1245 Cleveland TN E 3,830 $3.25 2015 41,285 1246 Collierville TN F $2.25 44,324 1247 Dyersburg TN E 1,500 $1.00 2012 17,043 $1,400,000 1248 Franklin TN E 3,350 $3.65 2004 66,280 $1,803,643 1249 Gallatin TN E 3,650 $5.00 2018 30,278 1250 Germantown TN T $3.25 2010 39,161 1251 Goodlettsville TN D $3.67 2012 16,176 $320,000 1252 Hamilton County TN D $0.75 11,530 1253 Hendersonville TN E 3,930 $6.00 2018 57,050 1254 Johnson City TN T $3.00 2007 63,815 1255 Kingsport TN E 3,794 $3.50 2011 49,232 $1,550,900 1256 La Vergne TN E 3,181 $3.50 2005 33,389 1257 Lebanon TN T $2.50 2017 31,317 1258 Lenoir City TN T $3.00 2017 9,106 $493,000 1259 Maryville TN E 2,400 $3.97 2003 27,646 1260 Memphis TN E 3,147 $4.64 2006 652,050 1261 Millington TN E 3,000 $3.80 2006 10,257 $241,893 1262 Morristown TN E 2,400 $2.50 2008 29,374 $2,422,368 1263 Murfreesboro TN E 3,470 $3.25 2007 100,575 $2,501,900 1264 Nashville/Davidson County TN T $6.00 2009 635,475 $700,000 1265 Shelby County TN D $1.50 2009 282,141 1266 Signal Mountain TN E 3,960 $3.30 2002 7,655 $1,350,000 1267 Smyrna TN E 3,543 $3.47 2008 25,569 $1,350,000 1268 Spring Hill TN E 3,412 $3.50 2009 29,735 1269 Springfield TN E 3,465 $2.00 1270 Tullahoma TN V $0.00 17,994 $1,465,540 1271 Abilene TX T $3.25 2003 118,117 $920,700 1272 Addison TX T $10.50 2012 13,056 1273 Allen TX F $3.50 1993 76,600

54 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 1274 Amarillo TX E 2,800 $2.61 2011 193,675 $4,565,500 1275 Arlington TX E 2,800 $7.25 1994 373,698 $14,892,242 1276 Austin TX E 1,763 $11.80 2003 820,611 $40,000,000 1277 Azle TX E 1,500 $3.00 2000 11,170 $514,000 1278 Baytown TX E 1,979 $3.00 2004 73,322 $1,346,200 1279 Bedford TX E 2,727 $4.50 2002 48,043 $300,000 1280 Belton TX T $4.00 2007 18,486 $932,536 1281 Benbrook TX E 3,186 $6.50 2007 21,715 1282 Bexar County TX T $1.10 2008 145,336 $840,000 1283 Bryan TX F $2.80 1997 77,321 $95,000 1284 Burkburnett TX E 3,500 $1.50 2007 10,740 1285 Celina TX E 5,000 $7.90 2016 6,744 1286 Cibolo TX E 2,889 $5.00 15,853 1287 Cleburne TX T $2.75 2004 29,681 $1,236,800 1288 College Station TX F $3.50 95,142 $846,000 1289 Colleyville TX T $7.00 1993 23,328 1290 Converse TX T $2.43 2010 18,643 $225,000 1291 Coppell TX T $1.00 2004 39,462 $445,000 1292 Corinth TX E 3,900 $6.00 20,662 1293 Corpus Christi TX V 2009 307,953 1294 Crowley TX A $3.50 2011 13,131 $208,000 1295 Dallas TX IA $5.68 1991 1,223,229 $49,838,421 1296 De Soto TX T $6.00 2001 50,045 $1,922,509 1297 Deer Park TX E 4,250 $1.45 2012 32,706 1298 Denton TX T $5.45 2002 117,187 $3,500,000 1299 Dickinson TX F $4.00 2001 18,967 1300 Eagle Pass TX D $3.00 2003 26,807 $17,355,799 1301 El Paso TX T $4.25 2007 665,568 $650,000 1302 Euless TX T 1990 52,443

55 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 1303 Fairview TX F $7.75 8,000 $1,002,115 1304 Flower Mound TX F $4.35 2003 65,851 $28,065,024 1305 Forest Hill TX T 2013 12,355 1306 Fort Worth TX T $5.40 2006 686,850 1307 Fredericksburg TX F $1.00 1996 8,911 1308 Frisco TX F $4.14 2009 33,714 1309 Gainesville TX E 1,895 $3.79 1993 16,569 $3,081,945 1310 Galveston TX D $7.00 47,743 $546,380 1311 Garland TX F $3.23 1991 224,750 $1,848,558 1312 Georgetown TX E 2,808 $6.50 45,342 $2,982,699 1313 Glenn Heights TX T $5.08 2009 11,511 1314 Grand Prairie TX A $4.47 1993 161,550 $1,321,898 1315 Grapevine TX F $4.00 48,583 $1,264,000 1316 Haltom City TX D $6.81 2004 40,811 1317 Harker Heights TX T $6.00 2002 26,026 1318 Hewitt TX T $4.72 2009 13,588 $384,000 1319 Highland Village TX E 4,094 $5.73 2006 15,738 1320 Houston TX IA $8.00 2010 1,953,631 1321 Hudson Oaks TX E 6,477 $5.60 2017 1,865 1322 Hurst TX IA $4.00 2009 36,273 $4,176,000 1323 Irving TX F $3.00 2003 205,600 1324 Jacinto City TX V 2002 9,870 $874,500 1325 Keller TX E 3,731 $7.00 37,700 1326 Kennedale TX IA $3.50 2010 7,284 $2,653,013 1327 Killeen TX T $6.00 2001 102,003 1328 Kingsville TX E 2,425 $1.25 2012 26,322 1329 Kyle TX IA $5.00 2016 39,060 1330 La Marque TX V 2002 14,194 1331 Lancaster TX F $7.97 36,236 $4,663,200

56 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 1332 Laredo TX T $6.50 215,484 1333 Leon Valley TX T 2009 11,020 1334 Lewisville TX IA $4.00 2017 77,737 1335 Little Elm TX E 3,687 $3.35 2011 25,797 1336 Live Oak TX E 3,007 $12.79 2009 12,471 1337 Lockhart TX T $2.50 2001 14,238 $7,414,982 1338 Lubbock TX T $13.48 1993 212,365 1339 Mansfield TX F $3.50 56,368 $1,590,000 1340 Marshall TX M $3.50 2016 23,561 1341 McAllen TX E 2,700 $1.50 2018 142,212 1342 McKinney TX E 2,343 $4.00 112,000 $2,130,000 1343 Mesquite TX D $4.50 136,750 1344 Midland TX T $2.00 2018 132,950 $2,470,000 1345 Mineral Wells TX M $2.50 2017 14,826 1346 Mission TX F $2.50 77,058 1347 Mount Vernon TX D $3.00 2010 2,286 1348 New Braunfels TX E 2,690 $4.59 2000 36,494 $806,450 1349 North Richland Hills TX T $15.41 64,050 $4,723,698 1350 Plano TX T $3.10 255,700 $5,184,230 1351 Portland TX F $3.00 18,500 1352 Princeton TX E 3,950 $4.85 2016 9,405 1353 Prosper TX IA $5.15 2008 9,613 1354 Red Oak TX T $4.85 2016 10,769 1355 Richardson TX IA $3.75 2011 99,223 $156,652 1356 Richland Hills TX D $8.00 1993 8,300 1357 River Oaks TX A $4.00 2012 7,597 1358 Round Rock TX IA $4.75 2010 105,000 $975,788 1359 Rowlett TX D $5.50 2002 54,869 $400,000 1360 Sachse TX E $1.66 2017 20,329

57 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 1361 Saginaw TX D $5.00 2005 18,950 $2,900,000 1362 San Angelo TX T $4.00 2009 91,880 $34,807,822 1363 San Antonio TX T $4.74 1997 1,306,900 $1,222,680 1364 San Marcos TX T $10.52 1999 53,205 $360,359 1365 Schertz TX E $5.20 32,160 $115,000 1366 Sealy TX F $2.00 2004 6,374 1367 Selma TX E 3433 $4.12 2010 5,046 $1,032,097 1368 Sherman TX E 3400 $1.00 2017 41,567 1369 Southlake TX E 1,000 $8.00 2006 26,224 $550,000 1370 Stephenville TX T $3.00 2002 17,050 1371 Sunset Valley TX E 3,350 $4.00 919 1372 Taylor TX E 2,500 $3.00 2010 16,106 $645,100 1373 Temple TX T $6.00 54,514 $496,000 1374 Terrell TX F $1.00 2011 16,112 1375 The Colony TX F $3.00 40,206 $112,300 1376 Trophy Club TX F $6.00 7,832 $1,267,954 1377 Tyler TX R 101,106 1378 Universal City TX T $4.47 2004 16,569 $500,200 1379 University Park TX T $6.78 24,182 $693,994 1380 Watagua TX F $11.00 24,150 1381 Weatherford TX E 3300 $4.50 25,557 $800,000 1382 Webster TX IA $1.24 2009 10,613 1383 White Settlement TX F $4.62 2005 16,116 $524,400 1384 Wichita Falls TX E 3,500 $5.00 2000 104,197 1385 Alpine City UT F $5.00 9,821 $150,000 1386 Bountiful City UT E 3,828 $7.00 41,301 1387 Cedar Hills UT E 2,900 $11.18 1998 10,066 $230,500 1388 Centerville UT E 3,600 $4.00 2007 14,585 1389 Draper City UT E 3,000 $9.00 2001 25,220 $3,530,625

58 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 1390 Eagle Mountain UT E 2,500 $5.00 2010 2,157 1391 Elk Ridge UT F $3.00 1,838 1392 Farmington UT E 4,083 $7.00 2003 12,081 1393 Layton UT T $6.60 1997 58,474 1394 Lehi City UT IA $3.00 1999 47,407 1395 Lindon UT F $5.47 8,363 1396 Logan UT E 3,000 $5.50 2005 42,670 1397 Midvale UT E 3,000 $8.00 2004 27,029 $430,000 1398 Moab UT E 3,000 $4.00 2008 4,779 1399 Murray UT E 3,400 $4.05 2006 46,558 1400 Nibley CIty UT F $7.25 2,045 $123,600 1401 North Logan UT E 4,700 $4.00 2007 6,163 1402 North Ogden UT V 1987 15,026 $547,712 1403 Ogden UT E 1,500 $7.85 77,226 1404 Orem UT E 2,700 $4.75 1996 84,324 1405 Park City UT E 2,000 $6.10 2016 7,873 1406 Payson UT E 2,700 $5.43 16,748 1407 Provo UT E 3,200 $9.20 105,166 1408 Riverdale UT E 2,600 $2.20 2005 7,656 $1,400,000 1409 Riverton UT E 2,744 $6.00 2010 25,011 $1,400,000 1410 Salt Lake City UT E 2,500 $6.91 1991 181,743 1411 Sandy UT E 2,816 $6.00 88,418 1412 Santa Clara UT E 3,500 $9.25 2004 4,630 1413 South Jordan UT E 4,752 $7.15 2011 55,934 $2,043,148 1414 Spanish Fork UT E 3,956 $9.82 20,246 1415 Springville UT E 3,800 $5.66 2007 25,998 1416 Sunset City UT E 9,000 $2.00 2012 5,213 $46,500 1417 Taylorsville UT E 3,800 $4.00 2007 58,620 1418 West Jordan UT E 10,890 $5.58 2011 68,336

59 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 1419 West Point UT E 2,500 $4.00 2010 6,033 $2,091,636 1420 West Valley City UT E 2,830 $4.00 2001 108,869 1421 Woods Cross UT E 3,000 $3.00 2004 6,419 1422 Alexandria VA E 2,062 $11.67 153,511 1423 Arlington County VA E 2,762 $2.17 189,453 $6,200,000 1424 Blacksburg VA T $6.00 2014 42,620 1425 Charlottesville VA T $7.20 2013 43,511 1426 Chesapeake VA E 2,112 $7.35 1992 222,209 $14,906,000 1427 Chesterfield County VA $2.08 2016 327,745 1428 Christiansburg VA E 3,030 $6.00 2016 21,533 1429 Colonial Heights VA E 2,656 $4.00 16,897 $375,000 1430 Falls Church VA IA $22.95 2013 12,332 1431 Galax VA E 4,700 $1.50 2016 7,042 1432 Hampton VA E 2,429 $7.83 1994 146,437 $8,191,972 1433 Harrisonburg VA IA $3.00 2015 51,395 $1,788,100 1434 Hopewell VA E 2,106 $4.00 2015 22,163 $731,000 1435 Isle of Wight County VA E 3,200 $4.50 2014 35,656 $1,638,173 1436 James City County VA E 3,235 $4.90 2007 48,102 $2,600,000 1437 Lynchburg VA E 2,672 $4.00 2012 76,504 1438 Manassas Park VA E 2,500 $2.97 2010 6,734 $8,500,000 1439 Newport News VA E 1,777 $11.60 1993 180,150 $10,600,000 1440 Norfolk VA E 2,000 $11.71 1996 234,403 1441 Petersburg VA E 2,116 $3.75 2013 32,420 $1,400,000 1442 Portsmouth VA E 1,877 $9.25 1995 100,565 $4,600,000 1443 Prince George County VA T $3.00 2014 37,253 1444 Prince William County VA T $1.55 1994 280,813 1445 Richmond VA T $6.41 2009 197,790 1446 Roanoke VA IA $5.40 2013 97,032 $6,065,000 1447 Stafford County VA V

60 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 1448 Staunton VA T $3.20 23,853 $3,500,000 1449 Suffolk VA E 3,200 $6.00 2006 63,677 $15,000,000 1450 Virginia Beach VA E 2,269 $12.99 1993 425,257 1451 Waynesboro VA E 1,600 $3.96 2015 21,263 1452 Burlington VT T $6.60 2009 38,889 $1,500,000 1453 Colchester VT E 4,400 $4.33 2017 17,067 $875,000 1454 Saint Albans VT E 3,000 $2.50 2018 6,795 1455 South Burlington VT T $5.94 2005 15,814 1456 Williston VT E 4,000 $4.25 2014 8,698 1457 Aberdeen WA F $6.69 1999 16,835 1458 Algona WA F $5.00 2004 2,460 1459 Anacortes WA E 3,600 $10.22 1999 15,941 1460 Arlington WA E 6,000 $6.89 2006 18,154 1461 Asotin County WA E 3,700 $6.00 2010 21,933 1462 Auburn WA T 1991 71,517 1463 Bainbridge Island WA E 3,000 $12.23 23,262 1464 Battle Ground WA E 3,000 $12.08 1982 17,893 $22,164,456 1465 Bellevue WA F $6.48 1974 124,798 1466 Bellingham WA T $22.60 2001 81,862 $9,000,908 1467 Black Diamond WA E 3,000 $16.00 2008 4,273 1468 Blaine WA T $5.67 1999 4,684 1469 Bonney Lake WA E 2,600 $14.00 1997 17,579 $1,659,913 1470 Bothell WA T $12.42 1994 34,055 $2,800,000 1471 Bremerton WA E 2,500 $16.17 1994 39,051 1472 Brier WA E 2,000 $6.50 1999 6,165 $221,991 1473 Buckley WA E 8,000 $23.77 1992 4,354 1474 Burien WA T $11.42 2008 33,977 1475 Burlington WA E 2,400 $6.88 1994 8,474 1476 Camas WA E 3,218 $12.04 1989 19,712

61 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 1477 Castle Rock WA T 1,982 1478 Centralia WA E 3,000 $8.00 2004 16,432 1479 Chehalis WA E 3,000 $7.95 1992 7,299 1480 Chelan County WA E 4,600 $5.50 2008 73,477 1481 Clark County WA E 3,500 $4.33 1980 433,418 1482 Des Moines WA T $22.57 1990 30,258 1483 Douglas County WA E 2,750 $3.75 1998 38,971 1484 DuPont WA F $15.61 1485 Duvall WA F $20.54 1981 6,828 1486 East Wenatchee WA E 2,750 $3.75 1999 13,375 1487 Edgewood WA T $13.25 1996 9,499 1488 Edmonds WA E 3,000 $12.35 1998 40,215 1489 Ellensburg WA E 3,900 $9.88 2009 18,468 1490 Enumclaw WA E 3,200 $5.24 2017 11,609 1491 Everett WA E 900 $13.06 2004 104,295 1492 Federal Way WA T $6.59 1990 91,085 1493 Ferndale WA E 10,000 $11.00 2006 11,564 1494 Fife WA T $3.78 2004 9,281 1495 Friday Harbor WA E 2,000 $13.50 1993 1,989 1496 Gig Harbor WA E 2,200 $14.42 1984 7,208 $234,575 1497 Hoquiam WA E 2,500 $10.83 2005 8,696 1498 Ilwaco WA T $8.28 2011 936 1499 Issaquah WA E 2,000 $16.47 1988 31,037 1500 Jefferson County WA E 3,000 29,924 1501 Kelso WA T $10.23 1993 11,934 1502 Kennewick WA V $5.46 76,224 1503 Kent WA E 2,500 $12.81 1992 120,916 1504 King County WA T $24.08 1986 1,969,722 1505 Kirkland WA E 2,600 $19.34 45,054 $4,000,000

62 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 1506 Kitsap County WA E 4,200 $8.00 1994 231,969 $2,857,800 1507 La Conner WA E 2,100 $15.08 2002 785 1508 Lacey WA T $11.36 1986 31,226 $135,955 1509 Lake Forest Park WA T $18.65 1990 13,142 1510 Lake Stevens WA T $8.67 1997 6,361 $1,358,984 1511 Lake Whatcom WA $12.58 2017 $817,600 1512 Liberty Lake WA E 3,160 $10.00 2003 4,660 1513 Longview WA F $13.68 1999 34,660 $523,000 1514 Lynden WA D $8.00 9,020 1515 Lynnwood WA E 2,900 $13.12 1991 33,847 $1,700,000 1516 Marysville WA E 3,200 $11.95 1999 25,315 1517 Mason County WA V $0.00 2008 49,405 1518 Mercer Island WA E 3,471 $30.64 1995 22,036 1519 Mill Creek WA E 3,000 $12.50 2001 11,525 1520 Milton WA E 2,800 $15.50 5,795 $1,121,833 1521 Monroe WA E 2,500 $12.28 1996 17,304 1522 Montesano WA E 3,000 $4.85 1999 3,312 1523 Moses Lake WA T $5.91 14,953 $1,334,000 1524 Mountlake Terrace WA E 2,282 $11.45 1999 20,362 1525 Mukilteo WA E 2,500 $21.20 1988 18,019 1526 Normandy Park WA E 3,100 $16.00 2003 6,392 1527 North Bend WA E 2,920 $12.36 2001 4,746 1528 Oak Harbor WA E 3,300 $11.95 1997 22,075 1529 Ocean Shores WA F $3.90 1980 5,569 $2,500,000 1530 Olympia WA T $14.05 1986 46,478 1531 Omak WA T $4.28 1984 4,845 1532 Orting WA T 1997 6,746 1533 Pacific WA E 2,500 $23.82 1999 6,737 1534 Pierce County WA T $10.61 1991 807,904

63 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 1535 Port Angeles WA E 4,000 $16.87 2003 19,154 1536 Port Orchard WA E 3,000 $14.00 2008 11,144 1537 Port Townsend WA E 3,000 $7.25 1987 9,113 1538 Poulsbo WA E 3,000 $18.08 1999 9,200 1539 Pullman WA E 3,500 $7.00 2009 29,799 1540 Puyallup WA E 2,800 $12.75 37,022 1541 Redmond WA R $16.56 1988 54,144 $2,915,881 1542 Renton WA T $14.85 1987 92,812 1543 Richland WA E 3,000 $3.85 1998 48,058 $1,721,356 1544 Sammamish WA E $18.75 2012 63,773 1545 San Juan County WA T $3.85 2005 15,844 1546 Seatac WA V $11.05 1992 26,909 1547 Seattle WA T $31.95 1987 602,778 $54,000,000 1548 Sedro-Woolley WA E 10,000 $10.80 2007 10,540 1549 Shelton WA T $22.70 1995 8,442 1550 Shoreline WA T $17.87 2009 53,007 1551 Skagit County WA T $5.00 1994 102,979 1552 Snohomish WA E 2,500 $15.27 2004 9,098 1553 Snoqualmie WA E 2,600 $22.83 1997 1,631 1554 Spokane WA D $4.42 2005 195,629 1555 Spokane County WA E 3,160 $3.33 1993 417,939 1556 Spokane Valley WA E 3,160 $1.75 1557 Stanwood WA T $14.20 2015 6,231 1558 Steilacoom WA E 2,500 $19.39 1994 6,049 1559 Sultan WA E 4,519 $10.29 4,183 1560 Sumas WA T $1.50 2005 1,265 1561 Sumner WA E 2,400 $16.33 8,504 1562 Sunnyside WA A $34.39 13,905 1563 Tacoma WA A $29.74 1984 193,556 $21,000,000

64 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 1564 Thurston County WA T $4.50 2002 207,355 1565 Toppenish WA E 2,000 $1.00 1991 8,946 1566 Tukwila WA T $15.42 1989 17,181 1567 Tumwater WA E 3,250 $10.63 1987 12,698 $5,322,346 1568 University Place WA T $15.93 1995 29,933 1569 Vancouver WA E 2,500 $10.13 1994 157,493 1570 Walla Walla WA E 5,000 $12.60 1999 30,945 $777,500 1571 Walla Walla County WA E 5,000 $3.00 2010 59,844 1572 Washougal WA D $16.28 2010 15,466 1573 Wenatchee WA E 3,000 $7.86 1995 27,856 1574 West Richland WA T $7.00 2006 8,358 1575 Woodinville WA T $7.26 1993 9,194 1576 Woodway WA T $12.81 1,307 1577 Yakima WA E 3,600 $6.13 2004 71,845 1578 Yelm WA T $8.50 1999 3,289 1579 Allouez WI E 3,663 $7.50 2006 14,126 1580 Altoona WI T $3.00 2007 6,789 1581 Antigo WI E 3,069 $3.52 2010 8,004 $410,968 1582 Appleton WI E 2,368 $14.58 1995 73,243 1583 Ashwaubenon WI F $4.17 2012 16,973 1584 Baraboo WI E 2,379 $4.10 2005 1,828 $635,126 1585 Barron WI E 10,850 $2.00 2005 3,425 1586 Bayside WI E 5,269 $18.58 2009 4,411 1587 Beaver Dam WI E 2,637 $4.05 2009 16,243 $779,000 1588 Bellevue WI E 3,221 $4.00 2002 14,742 1589 Beloit WI E 3,347 $3.50 2006 36,913 1590 Brookfield (Town of, not City of) WI V $6.80 6,390 1591 Brown Deer WI E 3,257 $8.84 2004 12,061 1592 Butler WI E 3,032 $7.18 1999 1,846

65 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 1593 Caledonia WI E 5,230 $5.44 24,737 $1,009,750 1594 Cambridge WI D $2.33 2005 1,101 1595 Chetek WI F $2.25 2005 2,222 1596 Chippewa Falls WI F $3.47 2005 13,738 1597 Cudahy WI E 2,700 $7.83 2001 18,359 $1,037,435 1598 De Forest WI E 2,900 $5.00 2005 9,085 1599 De Pere WI E 3,861 $6.83 2003 20,560 1600 Delafield WI E 1,000 $2.42 2004 7,100 1601 Denmark WI F $4.00 2007 2,148 1602 Durand WI E 3,300 $4.00 2010 1,968 1603 Eau Claire WI E 3,000 $7.17 1997 66,623 $495,558 1604 Elm Grove WI E 4,660 $10.23 2004 5,947 1605 Fitchburg (city) WI E 3,700 $6.50 2002 25,665 1606 Fitchburg (rural) WI E 3,700 $3.24 2002 4,000 1607 Fort Atkinson WI E 3,096 $2.82 2009 12,407 1608 Fox Point WI T $10.56 2009 6,734 1609 Franklin WI E 2,964 $3.00 35,620 1610 Garner's Creek Watershed WI E 3,623 $9.83 1998 1611 Glendale WI E 3,200 $4.50 1996 12,935 1612 Grand Chute WI E 3,283 $8.32 1997 18,392 1613 Grantsburg WI F $2.00 2004 1,397 $4,000,000 1614 Green Bay WI E 3,000 $6.91 2004 105,809 1615 Greendale WI E 3,941 $6.63 2004 14,117 1616 Greenfield WI E 3,630 $5.67 2009 36,903 1617 Greenville WI E 4,510 $5.83 1999 6,844 1618 Hales Corners WI E 3952 $1.17 2008 7,730 1619 Harrison WI F $8.00 1998 5,800 $126,214 1620 Hobart WI E 4,000 $6.00 2007 6,254 1621 Holmen WI E 3,550 $4.08 2007 9,081

66 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 1622 Howard WI E 3,301 $5.16 2005 17,602 1623 Hudson WI E 2,890 $2.50 2012 12,719 1624 Janesville WI E 3,200 $6.22 2003 63,479 $300,700 1625 Jefferson WI E 3,220 $3.33 7,997 1626 Kaukauna WI E 2,944 $6.00 12,983 1627 Kenosha WI R $7.44 2007 99,738 1628 Kimberly WI E 3,350 $9.17 2006 6,508 1629 La Crosse WI E 2,841 $4.49 2011 51,719 1630 Lake Delton WI E 1,685 $1.50 1993 1,982 1631 Lancaster WI E 2,400 $2.00 2008 3,868 1632 Lawrence WI V $0.92 2012 3,075 1633 Ledgeview WI E 5,800 $3.33 2010 3,363 $126,207 1634 Lisbon WI E 6,642 $4.00 2007 1,020 $201,773 1635 Little Chute WI E 2,752 $8.25 1998 10,514 1636 Madison WI R $7.75 2001 236,901 1637 Manitowoc WI E 3,167 $6.00 2007 34,053 1638 Marinette WI E 3,105 $4.08 2009 10,943 $1,400,000 1639 Marshfield WI F $5.50 2004 19,220 1640 Mazomanie WI E 3,639 2013 1,652 1641 McFarland WI E 3,456 $7.06 2007 7,937 $1,500,000 1642 Menasha WI E 2,980 $8.25 2009 17,442 1643 Menomonee Falls WI V 2002 35,704 1644 Menomonie WI E 3,000 $3.00 2008 14,937 1645 Middleton WI E 2,880 $3.75 19,660 1646 Milton WI E 4,081 $5.24 2009 5,538 1647 Milwaukee WI E 1,610 $5.65 2006 597,867 $25,720,339 1648 Monona WI F $5.00 2004 7,658 1649 Monroe WI E 2,728 $5.00 2006 10,843 $688,367 1650 Mount Pleasant WI E 3,000 $4.58 1998 26,601 $1,115,634

67 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 1651 Mukwonago WI E 3,000 $0.86 2006 8,519 1652 Neenah WI E 3,138 $7.08 2003 25,501 1653 New Berlin WI E 4,000 $5.00 2001 39,584 1654 New Glarus WI E 3,000 $4.85 2009 2,111 1655 New Richmond WI E 12,632 $2.94 2004 8,375 1656 North Fond du Lac WI E 3,123 $4.67 2007 5,014 1657 Oak Creek WI E 2,964 $2.42 34,451 1658 Onalaska (City) WI E 3,888 $4.97 2009 17,736 1659 Onalaska (Town) WI E 3,709 $2.00 2005 5,600 1660 Oshkosh WI E 2,817 $12.41 2003 66,083 $4,189,200 1661 Outagamie County WI E 8,000 177,913 1662 Palmyra WI F $9.77 2,911 1663 Pewaukee WI E 2010 $10.00 2010 13,195 1664 Pleasant Prairie WI E 2,000 $12.00 2006 19,719 1665 Poynette WI E 3,550 $5.00 2006 2,266 1666 Prairie du Sac WI E $3.62 3,231 1667 Pulaski WI E 4,100 3,682 1668 Racine WI E 2,844 $8.52 2004 78,860 1669 Raymond WI A $2.08 2007 3,516 1670 Reedsburg WI E 3,024 $3.90 2008 8,594 1671 Rhinelander WI E 3,305 $3.25 2012 7,756 1672 Rice Lake WI F $4.81 2011 8,438 1673 River Falls WI F $3.14 1998 14,889 1674 Rochester WI E 4000 $5.27 1675 Saint Francis WI E 2,500 $4.00 2001 9,365 1676 Salem WI E 3,000 $5.00 2010 9,871 $135,000 1677 Scott WI E 4,250 $3.75 3,712 1678 Sheboygan WI E 2,215 $3.00 2001 50,792 1679 Shorewood Hills WI E 2,941 $9.17 2007 1,732

68 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 1680 Silver Lake WI E 3,870 $7.83 2008 2,497 1681 Slinger WI E 4,300 $3.98 2007 5,068 1682 Somers WI E 5,000 $3.58 2018 9,597 $250,000 1683 South Milwaukee WI E 2,964 $6.00 21,256 1684 Stevens Point WI E 3,364 $4.92 26,748 1685 Stoughton WI E 3,105 $4.30 2012 12,817 1686 Sturtevant WI V 2008 6,941 1687 Suamico WI E 5,137 $2.08 2008 12,588 1688 Sun Prairie WI E 3,468 $7.50 2003 29,364 1689 Superior WI E 1,907 $5.90 2004 27,368 1690 Sussex WI E 3,897 $5.00 2005 10,518 1691 Two Rivers WI E 3,015 $5.75 2014 11,716 1692 Union Grove WI E 4,000 $7.28 2009 4,884 1693 Vernon WI E 6,904 $1.08 2006 7,227 1694 Verona WI E 2,842 $4.42 2009 10,619 1695 Washburn WI F $5.25 2005 2,280 1696 Watertown WI E 2,900 $6.77 2005 22,824 1697 Waupun WI E 3,204 $8.00 2005 11,340 1698 Wauwatosa WI E 2,174 $6.56 1999 47,271 1699 West Allis WI E 1,827 $6.43 1997 61,254 1700 West Milwaukee WI E 1,956 $3.00 2003 4,142 1701 West Salem WI E 2,400 $1.50 2007 4,837 1702 Weston WI E 3,338 $4.17 2004 14,904 1703 Whitefish Bay WI E 3,045 $8.33 1704 Whitewater WI E 3,850 $6.17 2007 14,769 $335,075 1705 Wind Point WI E 3,857 $2.71 2008 1,717 1706 Wisconsin Rapids WI E 2,620 $2.92 2008 18,217 1707 Beckley WV E 3,000 $3.75 2007 17,606 1708 Fairmont WV D $5.50 2006 18,737

69 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community State Fee Type ERU (ft2) Monthly Fee Year Population Ann. Rev. 1709 Huntington WV T $7.15 2017 49,138 1710 Hurricane WV D $1.50 2005 6,359 1711 Milton WV T $5.08 2016 2,498 1712 Morgantown WV T $5.88 2011 31,000 $23,007,683 1713 Moundsville WV D $5.00 2010 8,887 1714 Oak Hill WV D $5.00 2003 7,713 1715 Saint Albans WV T $8.50 2011 10,973 1716 Vienna WV F $4.00 2010 10,686 $6,063,636

70 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 Table A2. Canadian Stormwater Utilities (Data in this table provided by Mike Gregory, M.Sc., P.Eng., P.E.)

No. Community Province Fee Type ERU (m2) Monthly Fee Year Created Pop.

1 Calgary Alberta F $15.05 1994 1,239,200 2 Edmonton Alberta E $16.26 2003 932,500 3 St. Albert Alberta D $16.11 2003 65,600 Strathcona 4 County Alberta F $8.50 2007 98,000 5 Lloydminster Alberta/Saskatchewan T $13.00 2017 31,400 Langley 6 Township British Columbia AV $8.34 2003 117,300 7 Pitt Meadows British Columbia AV $8.57 2009 18,600 8 Richmond British Columbia T $13.12 2006 198,300 9 Surrey British Columbia T $18.58 2002 517,900 10 Victoria British Columbia E $20.25 2016 85,800 11 West Vancouver British Columbia F $27.12 2007 42,500 12 White Rock British Columbia E $38.83 2004 20,000 13 Halifax Nova Scotia E $5.30 2013 403,100

14 Aurora Ontario D $5.28 1998 55,400 15 Guelph Ontario E 188 $4.60 2017 131,800 16 Kitchener Ontario T $13.73 2011 233,200 17 London Ontario T $15.83 1996 383,800 18 Markham Ontario D $3.92 2015 329,000 19 Middlesex Centre Ontario T $14.88 2017 17,300 20 Mississauga Ontario E 267 $8.67 2016 721,600 21 Newmarket Ontario S $3.33 2017 84,200 22 Orillia Ontario T $0.88 2017 31,200 23 Ottawa Ontario T $4.44 2017 934,200 24 Richmond Hill Ontario D $5.19 2013 195,000 25 St. Thomas Ontario D $9.28 2000 38,900 26 Vaughan Ontario T $4.17 2017 306,200

71 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019 No. Community Province Fee Type ERU (m2) Monthly Fee Year Created Pop.

27 Waterloo Ontario T $11.19 2011 105,000 28 Regina Saskatchewan T $16.12 2001 215,100 29 Saskatoon Saskatchewan E 264 $4.40 2002 246,400

72 Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2019