Peer-Learning Workshop

Peer-learning workshop: Supporting the establishment of Riga Metropolitan Area Action Plan Venue: JURMALA CITY MUSEUM Tirgonu street 29, Majori, Jurmala Riga Planning Region, Latvia June 13, 2018 from 12:30 till 17:00 \ No. Name Surname Organisation 1. Alda Nikodemusa VASAB Secretariat 2. Arnis Šults Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development 3. Dace Pelne Jurmala City Council 4. Dace Stūre Jelgavas pilsētas dome 5. Dace Žīgure Mārupes novada dome 6. Diāna Orlovska University of Latvia 7. Edgars Pudzis Carnikavas novada dome 8. Edouard Fleury Métropole Européenne de Lille (MEL), FR 9. Guntars Auders Salaspils novada pašvaldība 10. Ilma Valdmane Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development 11. Ilona Raugze ESPON EGTC 12. Ilze Jureviča Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development 13. Ilze Krēmere Municipality of Marupe 14. Ināra Stalidzāne Carnikavas novada pašvaldība 15. Inga Brieze Riga Planning Region 16. Inga Zālīte Sigulda Municipality 17. Ingūna Urtāne MoEPRD 18. Jana Briede Riga planning region 19. Jānis Lagzdons Road Transport Administration 1 No. Name Surname Organisation 20. Jolanta Jansone Ķekava County local government 21. Jurģis Rācenis Aloja County municipality 22. Justīne Panteļejeva Riga City Council 23. Kristīne Danovska Kekava municipality 24. Kristīne Upeniece Engure municipality 25. Lāsma Lancmane Education, Culture and sports Department of Riga City 26. Liene Stikane VASAB 27. Līga Ozoliņa Grupa93, Ltd. 28. Lita Cielava RPR 29. Līga Kārkle Baltic Environmental Forum Latvia Līga Zvilna- 30. Karlsone VARAM 31. Maija Pintele VARAM 32. Māra Zīra Riga City Council City Development Department Michael 33. Rosenberger City of Vienna Planning Dept. 34. Miķelis Cinis Riga Technical university 35. Nataļja Sterhova STS Consulting SIA 36. Nicolas RossignnoI ESPON EGTC 37. Piera Petruzzi ESPON EGTC 38. Rinalds Muciņš Vides aizsardzības un reģionālās attīstības ministrija 39. Rūdolfs Cimdiņš Riga Planning Region 40. Sabīne Zāģere Riga Planning region 2 No. Name Surname Organisation 41. Valdis Bārs Ministry of Transport of the Republic of Latvia 42. Sanita Paegle Riga Planning Region 43. Peter Austin City of Oslo, Urban Development Dept 44. Edvīns Kāpostiņš VARAM 45. Marc Geldof SIA LATPS 46. Helēna Gūtmane Urban Institute 3 .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Joint Stock Company Eco Baltia
Joint Stock Company Eco Baltia a joint stock company, having its registered office at Darza iela 2, Riga, Latvia and registered with the Commercial Register of the Republic of Latvia under number 40103446506 Offering of up to 12,558,000 Shares, with a nominal value of LVL 1.00 each, and admission to trading on the Warsaw Stock Exchange and the Riga Stock Exchange of up to 28,704,000 Shares of Joint Stock Company Eco Baltia This document (the “Prospectus”) has been prepared for the purpose of (i) the offering (the “Offering”) of up to 12,558,000 bearer shares in the share capital, with a nominal value of LVL 1.00 each, in Joint Stock Company Eco Baltia (the “Issuer” or the “Company”), and (ii) the admission of up to 28,704,000 bearer shares of the Issuer (the “Shares”) to trading on the Warsaw Stock Exchange (Giełda Papierów Wartościowych w Warszawie S.A., the “WSE”) and the Riga Stock Exchange (NASDAQ OMX Riga, the “RSE”). The Issuer will be offering for subscription up to 6,279,000 newly issued Shares (the “New Shares”). Otrais Eko Fonds (the “Selling Shareholder”), the Issuer’s minority shareholder, will be offering up to 6,279,000 existing Shares (the “Sale Shares”). The New Shares to be issued by the Issuer and the Sale Shares offered by the Selling Shareholder are referred to, where the context permits, as the offer shares (the “Offer Shares”). The Issuer will only receive the net proceeds from the sale of the New Shares, whereas the Selling Shareholder will receive the net proceeds from the sale of its respective Sale Shares.
[Show full text]
Report on Integrating Modern Lighting Solutions in Urban Planning Process and Application of Green Public Procurement in the Municipalities of Riga Planning Region
REPORT ON INTEGRATING MODERN LIGHTING SOLUTIONS IN URBAN PLANNING PROCESS AND APPLICATION OF GREEN PUBLIC PROCUREMENT IN THE MUNICIPALITIES OF RIGA PLANNING REGION 2020 Table of Contents 1 Integration of urban lighting solutions in urban development planning documents and practices in the municipalities of Riga Planning Region ...................... 2 1.1 Regulation ....................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Outdoor lighting in Riga Planning Region ...................................................... 3 1.3 The case of the city of Riga (population 633,000) .......................................... 3 1.4 Case of the municipality of Mārupe (population 22,000) ............................... 7 1.5 Case of the municipality of Jūrmala (population 50,000) ............................... 8 1.6 The main preconditions and factors for successful integration of urban lighting in the urban planning process in the municipalities of Riga Planning Region ...................................................................................................................... 10 2 Green public procurement - the existing regulatory framework ....................... 12 2.1 Legislation ..................................................................................................... 12 2.2 Criteria for Green Public Procurement in outdoor lighting......................... 13 2.3 Practical application of green public procurement in Riga Planning Region14 2.4 Examples of practical application
[Show full text]
Ministero Della Salute Direzione Generale Per L'igiene E La Sicurezza Degli Alimenti E La Nutrizione Ufficio 2 Via Giorgio Ribotta 5- 00144Roma
arsl_ge.alisa.REGISTRO UFFICIALE.I.0012225.25-06-2018 0026792-25/06/2018-DGISAN-MDS-P Trasmissione elettronica N. prot. DGISAN in Docsa/PEC Ministero della Salute Direzione generale per l'igiene e la sicurezza degli alimenti e la nutrizione Ufficio 2 Via Giorgio Ribotta 5- 00144Roma ASSESSORATI ALLA SANITA’ REGIONI E PROVINCIA AUTONOMA DI TRENTO SERVIZI VETERINARI LORO SEDI ASSESSORATO ALL’AGRICOLTURA PROVINCIA AUTONOMA DI BOLZANO SEDE E p.c. ASSICA Pec: [email protected] UNICEB [email protected] [email protected] ASSOCARNI [email protected] FEDERCARNI [email protected] CONSORZIO DEL PROSCIUTTO DI PARMA [email protected]; [email protected] [email protected] CONSORZIO DEL PROSCIUTTO SAN DANIELE [email protected] CARPEGNA PROSCIUTTI S.p.A. [email protected] CONSORZIO DEL PROSCIUTTO DI MODENA [email protected] C.I.A. organizzazione @cia.it CNA [email protected] UNIONALIMENTARI [email protected] A.I.I.P.A. [email protected] CIM –CONSORZIO ITALIANO MACELLATORI Pec: [email protected] DGSAF Ufficio 1 SEDE OGETTO: Aggiornamenti sull’esportazioni di carne fresca suina, prodotti a base di carne suina e prodotti finiti contenti suino dall’ Italia verso la Federazione russa. Si fa seguito alle lettere di questo ufficio n° prot. 15196 del 12 aprile 2018 e N° prot. 10609 del 19 marzo 2018 concernenti l’oggetto per fornire ulteriori aggiornamenti giunti dalla Parte russa con le ultime linee guida Versione del 14/6/2018 e pervenuti per il tramite della Commissione europea, al fine di consentire una esatta compilazione della certificazione veterinaria che deve accompagnare le carni ed i prodotti del settore suino che sono esportati dall’Italia verso la Federazione Russa.
[Show full text]
INT-HERIT Sigulda
OPERATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION FRAMEWORK Sigulda The Development Strategy of Sigulda Castle Complex 2 Introduction The main challenge presented by the Development Strategy of Sigulda Castle Complex is revitalization of this historical site – Sigulda Castle Complex. Time has left many layers here from when the castle was built back in the 13th century through to the time it lost its importance as a military fortification in the 18th century. In 19th century the outer castle was flourishing and the castle ruins had become a popular place for lovers to go on romantic walks. In its grounds the Kropotkin family built the New Castle and established the manor centre. The traditions of tourism in Sigulda were thus initiated. After surviving the World War I, the New Castle was given to the Latvian Association of Journalists and Writers. The manor buildings and the New Castle underwent major renovations in 1937 thus transforming the interior of the castle into a pearl of Romanticism leaving the outer facade as a sole example of the castle’s historical neo- Gothic appearance. After World War II, for almost 40 years, access to the castle grounds was restricted and medical institutions were installed in the buildings. The revitalization of Sigulda Castle Complex was a dream by Siguldians for many years. Initially it seemed almost impossible as the site was in poor condition demanding way too much resourced from a small municipality of about 17 000 inhabitants. However, when the vision is clear and shared by majority even the most daring dreams may be reachable. Participation in URBACT Programme was seen as one of the steps for a successful implementation of the Development Strategy of Sigulda Castle Complex.
[Show full text]
Arheologu Un Etnogrāfu Pētījumi Latvijā
SEKCIJA “ARHEOLOGU UN ETNOGRĀFU PĒTĪJUMI LATVIJĀ 2018. –2020. GADĀ” Tēžu krājums SESSION “RESEARCH BY ARCHEOLOGISTS AND ETHNOGRAPHERS IN LATVIA IN 2018–2020” Abstracts 2021. gada 11. marts Sekcija “Arheologu un etnogrāfu pētījumi Latvijā 2018.–2020.gadā.” 2021.gada 11. marts. Tēžu krājums Session Research by archaeologists and ethnographers in Latvia in 2018–2020 Abstracts Sekcijas rīcības komiteja / Session Organizing Committee: Kristīne Beķere, Ilze Boldāne-Zeļenkova, Antonija Vilcāne, Guntis Gerhards Krājuma sastādītāja / Volume compiled by: Antonija Vilcāne Angļu valodas redaktors / English language editor: Valdis Bērziņš Tehniskā redaktore / Technical editor: Elita Egle © Tēžu autori, 2021 © Latvijas Universitāte, 2021 1 SATURS Sekcijas programma / Programme…………………………………………………………….4 Priekšvārds / Preface ………...………………………………………………………..............7 Valdis Bērziņš Neolīta laika podniecība kopienas dzīvesveida kontekstā: trauku rotāšana ar aptītās auklas un cūkdelfīnu zobu iespiedumiem / Neolithic pottery in the context of community lifeways: decoration with cord stamp and porpoise tooth impressions ……………………………….8-9 Mārcis Kalniņš, Aija Macāne Burtnieku paleoezera krastu arheoloģiskā apzināšana 2020. gadā: izpētes rezultāti un perspektīvas / Archaeological survey of the shores of Burtnieks paleolake in 2020: Research results and future potential………………………………………………………………..10-11 Vanda Visocka, Mārcis Kalniņš, Artis Kons Resursu apzināšana arheoloģijas kontekstā: Māli Daugavas lejtecē, Kurzemē un Burtnieka ezera apkārtnē / Survey of the resources
[Show full text]
Challenges of Small and Medium-‐Sized Urban Areas (Smuas)
Challenges of Small and Medium-Sized Urban Areas (SMUAs), their economic growth potential and impact on territorial development in the European Union and Latvia Research report to support the Latvian EU Presidency 2015 This paper has been written by HESPI and EUKN and consulted by ESPON on behalf of the Latvian Presidency of the Council of the European Union (The Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development). The research is financed by the Norwegian financial instrument programme 2009-2014 No. LV07 “Strengthening of capacity and institutional cooperation between Latvian and Norwegian institutions, local and regional institutions“ Project No 4.3.-24/NFI/INP-002. Final Report, 25 May, 2015 Social, Economic and Humanities Research Institute (HESPI) of Vidzeme University of Applied Sciences Cēsu iela 4, | Valmiera, LV-4201 | Latvia Tel. + 371 64207230 | www.va.lv/en/hespi Contact: Agita Līviņa, Director of HESPI European Urban Knowledge Network EGTC Koningin Julianaplein 10 | 2495 AA The Hague | Netherlands Tel. +31 703028484 | www.eukn.eu Contact: Mart Grisel, Director of EUKN EGTC 1 List of Authors Visvaldis Valtenbergs (HESPI), Alfons Fermin (EUKN), Mart Grisel (EUKN), Lorris Servillo (ESPON), Inga Vilka (University of Latvia, Faculty of Economics and Management), Agita Līviņa (HESPI), Līga Bērzkalne (HESPI). Table of Contents List of Abbreviations .............................................................................................. 3 List of Boxes, Figures Tables and Maps ..................................................................
[Show full text]
Map & Tourist Guide
LOCAL GOODS FOR GOURMETS HOTELS HOLIDAY HOUSES 1 | Valmiermuiža beer brewery Hotel "Dikļu pils" Holiday house "Mednieku namiņš" www.celotajs.lv/ The brewery offers both excursions and beer tastings, sells live Dzirnavu iela 2, Valmiermuiža Dikļi, Kocēni municipality ph. 64207480 www.diklupils.lv GPS: 57.5978, 25.1025 Mednieku, Sigulda ph. 26553922 medniekunamins GPS: 57.1618, 24.8255 beer, bath-house accessories and souvenirs. There is also a little phone: 20264269 Hotel "Aparjods" Holiday house "Pilskalni" “Pilskalni”, pub where you can enjoy beer foods and organize celebrations. www.valmiermuiza.lv Ventas iela 1a, Sigulda ph. 67972230 www.aparjods.lv GPS: 57.1414, 24.8446 Kocēni parish, Kocēni municipality ph. 29299268 www.pilskalni.lv GPS: 57.4615, 25.2684 Visitors are welcome to ride a horse or a pony and see the park of GPS: 57.5559, 25.4311 Hotel "Kārļamuiža" Holiday house "Ezerklabi" Valmiermuiža, or to get acquainted with the surroundings of “Kārļamuiža”, Kārļi, Amata municipality ph. 26165298 www.karlamuiza.lv GPS: 57.2406, 25.2121 “Jaun-Klabi”, Amata parish, Amata municipality ph. 29266445 www.ezerklabi.lv GPS: 57.1784, 25.2449 Valmiermuiža on horseback. SPA hotel "Ezeri" Holiday house "Jaunbrenguļi" “Ezeri”, Sigulda municipality ph. 67973009 www.hotelezeri.lv GPS: 57.1319, 24.8542 “Jaunbrenguļi”, Raiskums parish, "Jonathan Spa Estate" Pārgauja municipality ph. 26330479 www.jaunbrenguli.lv GPS: 57.3183, 25.1964 “Vējiņi”, 1 3 2 | Zilver house wines Amatciems, Amata municipality ph. 29222011 www.jonathanspahotel.com GPS: 57.2254, 25.3034 Holiday house "Vējiņi" The winery offers you to purchase Zilver house wines which have “Pīlādži”, Sigulda municipality Hotel "Sigulda" Straupe parish, Pārgauja municipality ph.
[Show full text]
Sigulda – Līgatne
30 km SIGULDA – LĪGATNE Daudu waterfall Owl at Līgatne Nature Trails Cyclists Photo: Archive of Sigulda TIC and Baltic Pictures Katrīnas Rock Description Distance Public transportation Suited for fit hikers or cyclists focused Around 30 km. For hikers: regional buses (check on an adventure in terms of views and timetable beforehand) run between emotions through the most impressive Duration Līgatne and Augšlīgatne, and from primeval valley of a river in Baltics. The 10 h on foot, 4-5 h by bicycle. there on pedestrians can get on the route runs through Gauja National Park. train (station “Līgatne”, railway line Road pavement Riga-Valka) or regional buses to Riga, Best time to go Mostly forest roads, gravel roads, paths, Cēsis and other towns. Trains (8-9 May–October. The route can be enjoyed asphalt roads in Sigulda and Līgatne. times per day) and regional buses run in other seasons as well, including the to Sigulda. beautiful winter days with a few snow, Starting point since the paths and forest roads are not Sigulda Railway Station Square. Worth knowing! cleaned from snow. 24.85422, 57.15287. Suitable trekking boots (or an MTB/ trekking bicycle) and local map or route Route Destination map is necessary. Navigation devices For hikers: Central square of Sigulda Līgatne Tourism Information Centre. might be useful. Cyclists should pedal Railway Station – Raiņa iela – Līvkalna 25.03968, 57.23348 with due care on the steep slopes and iela – Mound Paradīzes – Vējupīte wooden plank-ways and bridges which Ravine – Līgatne nature trails – Gaujas Distance to Riga can be slippery. Due to the route length, iela – Dārza iela – Spriņģu iela – Līgatne Starting point 53 km, destination 70 km.
[Show full text]
Latvian - Estonian Common Military Heritage Tourism Product” EST-LAT 156
Project „Latvian - Estonian Common Military Heritage Tourism Product” EST-LAT 156 On-line kick-off meeting minutes Participants: 1. Asnāte Ziemle Latvian Country Tourism Association "Lauku Celotajs" 2. Kristīne Pētersone Latvian Country Tourism Association "Lauku Celotajs" 3. Juris Smaļinskis Latvian Country Tourism Association "Lauku Celotajs" 4. Lauma Strode Latvian Country Tourism Association "Lauku Celotajs" 5. Jana Kalve Kurzeme planning region 6. Aiga Petkēvica Kurzeme planning region 7. Inga Brieze Riga Planning Region 8. Iveta Eizengrauda Riga Planning Region 9. Raitis Sijāts Vidzeme Tourism Association 10. Jānis Sijāts Vidzeme Tourism Association 11. Alise Plaude Vidzeme Tourism Association 12. Dace Klāmane Medical Rehabilitation Centre Ligatne 13. Inese Okonova Medical Rehabilitation Centre Ligatne 14. Kaspars Medical Rehabilitation Centre Ligatne 15. Ieva Dreibante Amata Municipality 16. Liene Johansone Olaine History and art museum 17. Samanta Anna Priedīte Olaine History and art museum 18. Kaspars Špēlis Ikšķile municipality 19. Anna Īviņa Ikšķile municipality 20. Mārtiņš NGO "Mores muzejs" 21. Anta Brača NGO "Mores muzejs" 22. Alise Indriksone Engure municipality 23. Ināra Stalidzāne Carnikava municipality 24. Lana Radčenko Saldus Municipality 25. Solvita Ūdre Ventspils Museum 26. Ilva Zavicka Ventspils Museum 27. Raina Jeeberg Municipality of Lääne-Nigula 28. Anu Viltrop Estonian War Museum 29. Liili Kask Panga Areng MTÜ 30. Maili Roio National Heritage Board of Estonia 31. Anton Parn Foundation Haapsalu and Läänemaa Museums 32. Deana Poder Foundation Haapsalu and Läänemaa Museums 33. Kati Aus Visit Saaremaa 34. Merily Marienhagen Setomaa Municipality Government 35. Raili Mengel ERTO 36. Katrin Papp ERTO 37. Silja Lehtpuu ERTO 38. Margit Säre Peipsi Center for Transboundary Cooperation 39. Ain Tahiste NGO Hiiumaa Military History Society 40.
[Show full text]
Guidelines for Coastal Erosion Mitigation”
Latvia-Estonia cross-border cooperation programme 2007-2013 “Coastal and marine spatial planning of the Gulf of Pärnu in Estonia and Latvian coastal municipalities” Methodological material “Guidelines for coastal erosion mitigation” (identification No. KPR 2013/12/EU43084) Carried out by: University of Latvia Department of Geography and Earth Sciences Reg. No. 3341000218 Address: Raiņa blvd. 19, Riga, LV-1586 Phone: 67034444 Fax: 67225039 E-male: [email protected] Senior Researcher : Dr. geol. Jānis Lapinskis E-male: [email protected] Pärnu, 19.05.2015. Contents n Introduction n Coasts of Latvia (natural conditions) n Coastal retreat forecast (2025 and 2060) n Coastal zoning by erosion risk level n Global experience in mitigating and limiting the effects of coastal erosion n Current coastal defenses and mitigation of the effects of erosion in Latvia n Case study area Pāvilosta town n Case study area Engure municipality n Recommendations Target for “Guidelines for coastal erosion mitigation” n Providing of support to coastal municipalities and landowners in decision-making, territory management and development planning in order to reduce negative consequences of the coastal erosion. n Target groups are: coastal municipalities, spatial planners, landowners and users, environmental specialists and state institutions. n Research area: the Baltic Sea and the Gulf of Riga coast in planning regions of Kurzeme and Riga. Is coastal erosion an issue in Latvia (or will it be in future)? n The total length of the coastal sections, where the coastline is retreating today is: n 0,1 – 0,5 m/year ~ 120 km; It is expected that due to coastal retreat territory of Latvia will be reduced by about n 0,6 – 1,5 m/year ~ 50 km; 9.2 km2 by year 2060.
[Show full text]
Information Report Long-Term Strategy for the Renovation of Buildings Riga
Information report Long-term strategy for the renovation of buildings Riga, 2020 LV 2020 LTRS official translation EN Table of Contents Abbreviations ....................................................................................................... 3 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 4 1. Overview of the national building stock .......................................................... 7 2 Existing policies and activities promoting energy efficiency .......................... 14 2.1 A cost-effective approach to building renovation .................................... 14 2.2 Policies and activities for the cost-effective and progressive complete renovation of buildings ............................................................................................ 21 2.3 Building stock with the worst performance, conflicting interests of parties and market deficiencies. Actions to reduce energy poverty .................................... 33 2.3.1 Building stock with the worst performance....................................... 33 2.3.2 Market deficiencies ........................................................................... 34 2.3.3 Possible influencing factors for future renovation of buildings ........ 36 2.3.4 Obstacles to the renovation of buildings ........................................... 38 2.3.5 Reducing energy poverty ................................................................... 42 2.4 National initiatives promoting smart technologies
[Show full text]
Cost-Benefit Analysis of Technologies For
ENGINEERING FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT Jelgava, 23.-25.05.2018. COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF TECHNOLOGIES FOR ALTERNATIVE USE OF GRASS BIOMASS FROM GRASSLANDS Alberts Auzins Institute of Agricultural Resources and Economics, Latvia [email protected] Abstract. The article deals with the cost-benefit analysis of technological solutions for the alternative use of grass biomass from grasslands. There are three technological solutions assessed – production of biogas from grass biomass, production of biobutanol from grass biomass and production of pellets from grass biomass. These technologies offer an alternative to the use of grass biomass as fodder. Benefits and costs (expenditure) are analysed from the positions of the operators of the technological solutions. The cost-benefit analysis has been carried out by applying the method of discounted cash flow as this method allows assessing the entire life cycle of the technological solution including the investment cost. The assessments are based on the data from grasslands in two municipalities of Latvia as well as the data from pilot facilities. To measure the balance of benefits and costs, the net discounted cash flow or net present value is used as an indicator. The cost-benefit analysis has been conducted by examining several options (at least two) for each technological solution. According to the results of the analysis carried out, the balance of benefits and costs are negative for two technological solutions (for all the options analysed) – the production of biogas and the production of biobutanol. The balance of benefits and costs is positive for the production of pellets (for two options analysed). However, the production of biogas has prospects of achieving the positive balance of benefits and costs, as the benefits increasingly exceed operational expenditures at higher production capacity.
[Show full text]