DOCSLIB.ORG

Innst. 210 S (2012–2013) Innstilling Til Stortinget Fra Kontroll- Og Konstitusjonskomiteen

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Innst. 210 S (2012–2013) Innstilling Til Stortinget Fra Kontroll- Og Konstitusjonskomiteen Innst. 210 S (2012–2013) Innstilling til Stortinget fra kontroll- og konstitusjonskomiteen Innstilling fra kontroll- og konstitusjonskomiteen om redegjørelse av statsministeren og justis- og beredskapsministeren i Stortingets møte 28. august 2012 om regjeringens oppfølging av rapporten fra 22. juli-kommisjonen Vedlegg 18: Referat fra åpne høringer Innhold Side Side 1. Bakgrunn ............................................. 5 3.7.12 Politihelikopteret ................................. 28 1.1 Innledning ............................................. 5 3.7.13 Manglende bruk av beredskaps- 1.2 Hendelsene 22. juli 2011 ...................... 5 planverk ................................................ 28 1.3 Redegjørelse fra justisministeren og 3.7.14 PSTs ansvar for å bekjempe terror ....... 29 forsvarsministeren i Stortingets møte 3.7.15 Justisdepartementet .............................. 30 10. november 2011 .............................. 5 3.7.16 Politiets anmodning om Forsvarets 1.4 Granskingskommisjonen ...................... 6 ressurser ............................................... 31 1.5 Redegjørelsen fra statsministeren og 3.8 Komiteens konklusjoner ...................... 32 justis- og beredskapsministeren ............ 6 3.8.1 Kultur- og ledelsesutfordringer ............ 33 2. Komiteens behandling ........................ 7 3.8.2 Politisk ansvar ..................................... 35 2.1 Den parlamentariske kontroll- 3.8.3 Konstitusjonelt ansvar .......................... 38 funksjonen ............................................. 7 3.8.4 Mistillit ................................................. 38 2.2 Innhenting av dokumentasjon ............... 7 3.8.5 Daddelsvedtak/kritikkvedtak ............... 39 2.3 Spørsmål til ansvarlige statsråder ......... 9 2.4 Befaringer ............................................. 10 4. Forslag fra mindretall ........................ 40 2.5 Kontrollhøringer ................................... 10 5. Komiteens tilråding ............................ 40 3. Komiteens merknader ........................ 11 3.1 Terrorhandlingene 22. juli 2011 ........... 11 Vedlegg 3.2 22. juli-kommisjonen ............................ 12 1 Redegjørelse av statsminister 3.3 Komiteens behandling .......................... 12 Jens Stoltenberg i Stortingets møte 3.4 Ofre, pårørende og etterlatte ................. 12 28. august 2012 ................................... 41 3.5 Frivillige ............................................... 13 Redegjørelse av statsråd 3.6 Sikkerheten i regjeringskvartalet .......... 13 Grete Faremo i Stortingets møte 3.6.1 Stenging av Grubbegata ........................ 14 28. august 2012 ................................... 46 3.6.2 Oslo kommunes behandling ................. 14 3.6.3 Manglende midlertidige tiltak ............... 17 3.6.4 Ansvaret for stengingen av Komiteens korrespondanse Grubbegata ............................................ 17 2 Brev fra kontroll- og konstitusjons- 3.6.5 Sikkerhetsloven og forskrift om komiteen til statsministeren, objektsikkerhet ...................................... 19 datert 12. oktober 2012 ........................ 52 3.7 Svikt i beredskapen ............................... 20 3 Brev fra statsministeren til kontroll- 3.7.1 Styringen av norsk politi – beredskap . 20 og konstitusjonskomiteen, 3.7.2 Politidirektoratet ................................... 21 datert 26. oktober 2012 ...................... 53 3.7.3 Politiaksjonen i regjeringskvartalet ...... 22 4 Brev fra kontroll- og konstitusjons- 3.7.4 Politiets operasjonssentraler ................. 22 komiteen til Justis- og beredskaps- 3.7.5 Politireserven ....................................... 23 departementet v/statsråden, datert 3.7.6 Politiaksjonen på Utøya ........................ 23 12. oktober 2012 ................................. 57 3.7.7 Politiets innsats – justisministerens og 5 Brev fra Justis- og beredskaps- forsvarsministerens redegjørelse til departementet v/statsråden til Stortinget 10. november 2011 og kontroll- og konstitusjonskomiteen, politiets egen evaluering ....................... 24 datert 26. oktober 2012 ....................... 62 3.7.8 Politietatens ressurser for å bekjempe 6 Brev fra kontroll- og konstitusjons- terror ..................................................... 24 komiteen til Fornyings-, 3.7.9 IKT i politiet ......................................... 25 administrasjons- og kirkedeparte- 3.7.10 Riksalarm .............................................. 27 mentet v/statsråden, datert 3.7.11 Nødnettet – politiets kommunikasjon 27 12. oktober 2012 ................................. 87 7 Brev fra Fornyings-, administrasjons- 14 Brev fra kontroll- og konstitusjons- og kirkedepartementet v/statsråden til komiteen til Kommunal- og kontroll- og konstitusjonskomiteen, regionaldepartementet, datert 26. oktober 2012 ....................... 88 datert 6. november 2012 ..................... 100 8 Brev fra kontroll- og konstitusjons- 15 Brev fra Helse- og omsorgs- komiteen til Forsvarsdepartementet departementet v/statsråden til v/statsråden, datert 12. oktober 2012 .... 96 kontroll- og konstitusjonskomiteen, 9 Brev fra Forsvarsdepartementet datert 16. november 2012 ................... 101 v/statsråden til kontroll- og 16 Brev fra kontroll- og konstitusjons- konstitusjonskomiteen, datert komiteen til Helse- og omsorgs- 26. oktober 2012 .................................. 96 departementet, datert 28. november 10 Brev fra kontroll- og konstitusjons- 2012 ..................................................... 104 komiteen til Fornyings-, administrasjons- 17 Brev fra Helse- og omsorgs- og kirkedepartementet, datert 16. januar departementet v/statsråden til 2013 ..................................................... 97 kontroll- og konstitusjonskomiteen, 11 Brev fra Fornyings-, administrasjons- datert 11. januar 2013 ......................... 104 og kirkedepartementet v/statsråden til kontroll- og konstitusjonskomiteen, datert 18. januar 2013 .......................... 98 18 Referat fra åpen høring i kontroll- og 12 Brev fra kontroll- og konstitusjons- konstitusjonskomiteen om komiteen til Fornyings-, administrasjons- Redegjørelse av statsministeren og og kirkedepartementet, justis- og beredskapsministeren om datert 6. februar 2013 ........................... 98 regjeringens oppfølging av rapporten 13 Brev fra Fornyings-, administrasjons- fra 22. juli-kommisjonen ................... 105 og kirkedepartementet v/statsråden til kontroll- og konstitusjonskomiteen, datert 11. februar 2013 ......................... 99 Innst. 210 S (2012–2013) Innstilling til Stortinget fra kontroll- og konstitusjonskomiteen Innstilling fra kontroll- og konstitusjonskomiteen En omfattende redningsaksjon ble iverksatt og om redegjørelse av statsministeren og justis- og mange liv ble berget som følge av godt redningsar- beredskapsministeren i Stortingets møte beid. Det ble likevel fort klart at det var mye som ikke 28. august 2012 om regjeringens oppfølging av hadde fungert som det skulle. rapporten fra 22. juli-kommisjonen Norge hadde opplevd det verste anslaget i freds- tid. 77 mennesker var drept, et stort antall var alvorlig skadet, og ofre og pårørende var påført enorme tap og Til Stortinget lidelser. I tillegg var det politiske Norge hardt ram- met og Statsministerens kontor og seks departemen- ter var uten lokaler. 1. Bakgrunn I dagene og ukene etter terroren mobiliserte hele 1.1 Innledning det norske folk, med kongefamilien og statsministe- ren i spissen. Nasjonen var samlet i sorg, men også i I Stortingets møte 28. august 2012 holdt statsmi- fortvilelse over at samfunnet ikke hadde vært bedre i nister Jens Stoltenberg og justis- og beredskapsmi- stand til å stanse gjerningsmannen. nister Grete Faremo en redegjørelse om regjeringens oppfølging av 22. juli-kommisjonens rapport. Ved møtets slutt ble det vedtatt å sende redegjørelsen til 1.3 Redegjørelse fra justisministeren og kontroll- og konstitusjonskomiteen for videre forsvarsministeren i Stortingets møte behandling. 10. november 2011 Den 10. november 2011 holdt daværende justis- 1.2 Hendelsene 22. juli 2011 minister Knut Storberget og daværende forsvarsmi- nister Grete Faremo en redegjørelse til Stortinget om 22. juli 2011, kl. 15.25, ble Norge rammet av den mest alvorlige terrorhendelsen noen gang i fredstid. angrepene 22. juli 2011. Stortinget besluttet samme En bombe på 950 kilo eksploderte i regjeringskvarta- dag, i medhold av Stortingets forretningsorden § 14 let og drepte åtte personer. I tillegg ble et stort antall første ledd, å nedsette en særskilt komité for å mennesker skadet, og det var enorme materielle øde- behandle saken videre. Komiteens arbeid ble avgren- leggelser på bygninger og infrastruktur. Én person set mot etterforskning og iretteføring, dvs. faktum og sto bak ugjeringen, og han tok seg samme ettermid- skyldspørsmålet knyttet til den straffbare handlingen dag til Utøya der AUF arrangerte sin årlige sommer- som forårsaket tragedien 22. juli. Komiteens arbeid leir. Gjerningsmannen gikk i land på Utøya kl. 17.17, ble videre avgrenset mot 22. juli-kommisjonen pågå- forkledd som politi, og drepte i alt 69 personer; de ende arbeid. fleste svært unge. I tillegg ble et stort antall ungdom- Komiteen sendte i to omganger omfattende mer livstruende skadet. De som slapp fysisk uskadet skriftlige spørsmål til ulike departementer og avholdt fra massedrapet var vitne til grufulle hendelser. Flere åpen høring 18. januar 2012. la på svøm for å berge livet. Politiet pågrep gjernings- Den særskilte komités innstilling i saken ble mannen om lag kl.18.34.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rsterrorists on TRIAL
    Alex P. Schmid | Alex P. Beatrice de Graaf Terrorism trials are an exceptional opportunity for better understanding and, hence, countering terrorism, since they are often the only place where most if not all of the actors of a terrorist incident meet again, and where the media report and broadcast their respective accounts. A nexus between terrorist violence, law enforcement and public opinion, terrorism trials showcase justice in progress and thus demonstrate to the world how terrorism suspects are treated under national law. editors This volume views terrorism trials as a form of theatre, where the “show” that a trial may offer can develop often unexpected dynamics, which at times might inconvenience the government. Seeing terrorism trials as a stage where legal instruments are used (and abused) to argue ON TRIAL TERRORISTS the validity of contested political constructs, this study presents a performative perspective to draw attention to the mechanisms and effects of terrorism trials in and outside the courtroom. With a special focus on how the power of these performances may in turn shape new narratives of justice and/or injustice, it offers vital insights into terrorism trials directed involving different types of terrorism suspects, from left-wing to ethno-nationalist and jihadist terrorists, in Spain, Russia, Germany, the Netherlands, and the United States. Beatrice de Graaf holds a chair in the History of International Relations & Global Governance at Utrecht University. She was co-founder of the Centre for Terrorism and Counterterrorism at Leiden University, TERRORISTS publishes on security-related themes and is currently working on secu- rity in the nineteenth century for an ERC Project SECURE.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Media Use in Crisis and Risk Communication
    Social Media Use in Crisis and Risk Communication Blood and Security during the Norway Attacks: Authorities’ Twitter Activity and Silence Rune Ottosen, Steen Steensen, Article information: To cite this document: Rune Ottosen, Steen Steensen, "Blood and Security during the Norway Attacks: Authorities’ Twitter Activity and Silence" In Social Media Use in Crisis and Risk Communication. Published online: 13 Sep 2018; 63-84. Permanent link to this document: https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78756-269-120181008 Downloaded on: 27 September 2018, At: 04:30 (PT) References: this document contains references to 0 other documents. The fulltext of this document has been downloaded 25 times since 2018* Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by All users group For Authors If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose Downloaded by 158.37.170.67 At 04:30 27 September 2018 (PT) which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information. About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.com Emerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services. Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anders Behring Breivik Trial: Performing Justice, Defending Democracy
    The Anders Behring Breivik Trial: Performing Justice, Defending Democracy Prof. Dr. Beatrice de Graaf, Liesbeth van der Heide, Sabine Wanmaker & Daan Weggemans ICCT Research Paper June 2013 On 24 August 2012, the judges of the Oslo District Court passed their final verdict in the case of Anders Behring Breivik, declaring Breivik criminally sane and legally responsible for the killing of 77 people during the bombing of government buildings in Oslo and the shooting spree on the island of Utøya on 22 July 2011. This ICCT – The Hague Research Paper examines to what extent the Breivik trial attained the goals of criminal justice: retribution, prevention, restoring democratic order and upholding the rule of law. Furthermore, it aims to determine if the trial contributed to the need for closure in society. The paper concludes that the trial did indeed have a positive impact on the coping mechanisms in Norwegian society and that most Norwegians viewed the trial as a positive counter-weight to the brutality of Breivik’s acts. Overall, the trial was viewed as an example of justice and as a trial that upheld the democratic values of Norwegian society – in stark contrast to Breivik’s values. About the Authors Beatrice de Graaf is Professor of Conflict and Security in Historical Perspective at the Centre for Terrorism and Counterterrorism (CTC) of Campus The Hague - Leiden University, and a Research Fellow at the International Centre for Counter Terrorism – The Hague. She is a member of the editorial board of Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, Perspectives on Terrorism, Journal of European Intelligence Studies; and the Zeitschrift für Auswärtige und Sicherheitspolitik.
    [Show full text]
  • THE NORWAY TERRORISM ATTACK - a STUDY of a LONE WOLF OPERATION Dr
    Terrorism Risk Advisory July 29, 2011 THE NORWAY TERRORISM ATTACK - A STUDY OF A LONE WOLF OPERATION Dr. Gordon Woo, RMS Catastrophist, provides his comments on the July 22, 2011 Norway terrorist attacks. Since 9/11, many dozens of terrorist plots, including those planned by right-wing extremists, have been interdicted in the Western democracies. In particular, infiltration of extremist fascist groups by the Western intelligence services has been successful in preventing any right-wing macro-terror plot, such as a possible repeat of the 1995 Oklahoma bombing. A continuing concern to the FBI is the individual offender or what counterterrorism experts coined as a lone wolf. A lone wolf is a single individual driven to hateful attacks based on a particular set of beliefs without a larger group’s knowledge or support. The FBI believes that most U.S. domestic attacks are carried out by lone wolves to promote their own grievances and agendas. Even in Western countries with the most effective and well-resourced counterterrorism services, catching lone wolf terrorists is difficult and haphazard. With a minimal social network of plotters, the chance may only be 1 in 4. Accordingly in February 2010, CIA director Leon Panetta reckoned the lone wolf strategy to be the main terrorist threat to the U.S. homeland. In a small outlying peaceful country such as Norway, where the authorities ranked the terrorist threat as low, and dismissed right-wing extremism as not a serious threat, there would only have been a very slim chance of stopping a lone wolf terrorist through intelligence gathering.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrorists on Trial De Graaf, Beatrice, Schmid, Alex P
    Terrorists on Trial De Graaf, Beatrice, Schmid, Alex P. Published by Leiden University Press De Graaf, Beatrice and Alex P. Schmid. Terrorists on Trial: A Performative Perspective. first ed. Leiden University Press, 0. Project MUSE.muse.jhu.edu/book/46327. https://muse.jhu.edu/. For additional information about this book https://muse.jhu.edu/book/46327 [ Access provided at 15 Apr 2020 10:35 GMT from Utrecht Universiteit ] This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. 11. Performing Justice, Coping with Trauma: The Trial of Anders Breivik, 2012 Tore Bjørgo, Beatrice de Graaf, Liesbeth van der Heide, Cato Hemmingby and Daan Weggemans 11.1. Introduction The sophistication behind the attacks, the extreme brutality, the number of victims and the fact that 33 of the 77 people killed were under the age of 18, made the 22 July 2011 attacks in Norway one of the major terrorist incidents in the history of terrorism. Compared to other acts of terrorism conducted by a single actor, they were unique in their destructiveness. The subsequent trial was also unique for the Norwegian judicial system and court administration. At the same time, this was also a highly dramatic and explicit example of a terrorist suspect’s attempt to turn his trial into a theatre. In the 1,500-page manifesto that Anders Behring Breivik posted on the internet, he wrote ‘your trial will offer you a stage to the world’.1 In addition, the Norwegian newspaper Verdens Gang published extracts of a letter Breivik sent from his cell in which he stated that the court case looked like a circus; ‘it is an absolutely unique opportunity to explain the idea of 2083 [the manifesto] to the world’.2 He described the attacks in Oslo and Utøya as only the first part of his ‘operation’.
    [Show full text]
  • TV 2 Nyhetene Asbjørn Olsen Og Jens Christian Nørve Postboks 2 Sentrum 0101 Oslo Tlf
    1 TV 2 Nyhetene Asbjørn Olsen og Jens Christian Nørve Postboks 2 Sentrum 0101 Oslo Tlf. 02255 Innholdsfortegnelse 1 Innledning ........................................................................................ 3 2 Kort beskrivelse av saken og hva som er genuint nytt ............................. 3 3 Når og hvordan kom arbeidet i gang, hva var ideen som startet det hele? ... 4 3.1 Frokosten ................................................................................... 4 3.2 Stille i gatene .............................................................................. 5 3.3 Gjennombruddet.......................................................................... 6 3.4 Den første sentrale problemstillingen .............................................. 7 3.5 Det stoppet opp ........................................................................... 7 3.6 - De fotfølger personer ................................................................. 8 3.7 En god dag på jobben ................................................................... 9 3.8 Tegninger sperret .......................................................................11 3.9 Overvåking ................................................................................11 3.10 Terroralarmen går .......................................................................12 3.11 Stipend .....................................................................................13 3.12 Barnevogn .................................................................................14 3.13 Strøm
    [Show full text]
  • Perpustakaan.Uns.Ac.Id Digilib.Uns.Ac.Id Commit to User TERORISME DALAM MEDIA MASSA
    perpustakaan.uns.ac.id digilib.uns.ac.id i TERORISME DALAM MEDIA MASSA (Analisis Media Framing Terhadap Berita dan Tajuk Seputar Aksi Terorisme di Norwegia pada Harian Umum Kompas, Republika dan Jawa Pos Periode Juli-Agustus 2011) Disusun oleh: YULIA WIDAYANI D0207111 JURUSAN ILMU KOMUNIKASI FAKULTAS ILMU SOSIAL DAN ILMU POLITIK UNIVERSITAS SEBELAS MARET SURAKARTA 2012 commiti to user perpustakaan.uns.ac.id digilib.uns.ac.id ii commitii to user perpustakaan.uns.ac.id digilib.uns.ac.id iii commitiii to user perpustakaan.uns.ac.id digilib.uns.ac.id iv MOTTO DAN PERSEMBAHAN “Asyhadu alla ilaa ha Illallah Wa asyhadu anna Muhammadar Rasulullah” Karya sederhana ini penulis persembahkan Untuk Ibunda, Ibunda, Ibunda, Ayahanda Untuk Kakak dan Adik Untuk sahabat terbaik Untuk almamaterku commitiv to user perpustakaan.uns.ac.id digilib.uns.ac.id v KATA PENGANTAR Alhamdulillaahirobbil’alamin. Penulis senantiasa memanjatkan rasa syukur kehadirat Allah SWT atas kelimpahan rahmat, taufiq, hidayah, inayah kemudahan dan kelancaran dalam proses pengerjaan karya sederhana ini hingga selesai sekarang. Sebab hanya atas izin-Nya, karya skripsi ini bisa terwujud. Tak lupa pula sholawat serta salam senantiasa tercurah kepada Rasulullah Muhammad SAW, keluarga, sahabat dan para umatnya. Penulis berharap karya ini merupakan bagian dari upaya menggapai keridhoan-Nya. Skripsi berjudul TERORISME DALAM MEDIA MASSA (Analisis Media Framing Terhadap Berita dan Tajuk Seputar Aksi Terorisme di Norwegia pada Harian Umum Kompas, Republika dan Jawa Pos Periode Juli-Agustus 2011) ini disusun guna memenuhi persyaratan untuk mencapai gelar sarjana Ilmu Komunikasi di Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta. Selain itu, semoga karya ini menjadi salah satu bentuk pematangan mental dan intelektual penulis selama belajar di perkuliahan dari titik awal sampai dengan akhir.
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy and Terrorism – Experiences in Coping with Terror Attacks Case Studies from Belgium, France, Israel and Norway
    INTERNATIONAL POLICY ANALYSIS Democracy and Terrorism – Experiences in Coping with Terror Attacks Case Studies from Belgium, France, Israel and Norway ANNA MARIA KELLNER (ED.) July 2017 n Terrorism poses unique challenges to democracies and democratic leaders alike. The question is: How should democratic societies respond to terrorist attacks? Is there such a thing as a uniquely democratic response to a terrorist incident? n In their efforts to be seen to respond visibly and forcefully, all the countries sur- veyed have introduced changes, often far-reaching: expanding the powers of law enforcement and the executive, passing new laws, even imposing a prolonged state of emergency – with questionable outcomes. n Even if very far-reaching measures largely meet with majority approval, concern to create a rapid and assertive response can easily eclipse the question of propor- tionality of means. Regular stocktaking and cost/benefit analyses are imperative to maximise security without abandoning the principles of rule of law or unnecessarily curtailing civil rights and liberties. ANNA MARIA KELLNER (ED.) | DEMOCRACY AND TERRORISM Contents Foreword � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �3 Anna Maria Kellner The Brussels Bombings – Striking a Balance Between Law Enforcement and Risk Management �����������5 Paul Ponsaers & Elke Devroe Democracy and Terrorism – Experience in Coping with Terror Attacks in France �������������������������15 Jean-Pierre Maulny New Terror
    [Show full text]
  • Drivers and Barriers
    Between change and continuity How has the Norwegian Police Security Service responded to a new security environment? Kristian Larsen Master’s Thesis in Peace and Conflict Studies Department of Political Science UNIVERSITY OF OSLO October 31, 2013 © Kristian Larsen 2013 Between change and continuity How has the Norwegian Police Security Service responded to a new security environment? Kristian Larsen http://www.duo.uio.no/ Trykk: Reprosentralen, Universitetet i Oslo II Acknowledgements This thesis marks the end of my Master’s Degree in Peace and Conflict Studies at the University of Oslo. The choice of research topic stems from a combination of my own academic and professional interest in intelligence. While recognizing that writing a thesis on intelligence would be a challenging undertaking, the choice has never been doubted. I wish to direct a special thanks to my outstanding thesis supervisor, Jacob Aasland Ravndal, for rendering helpful comments and advice throughout the process. Jacob’s ability to bring timely and comprehensible guidance to my project has been highly valuable and motivating for my effort. Thanks also to my girlfriend, Agnieszka Cybulska, for proofreading my English and sharing her guidance. The responsibility for any mistakes or misunderstandings is entirely my own. III IV Glossary and Abbreviations 22/7 Terrorist attacks in Norway on July 22, 2011 9/11 Terrorist attacks in the US on September 11, 2001 DSB Directorate for Civil Protection and Emergency Planning / Direktoratet for samfunnssikkerhet og beredskap EOS
    [Show full text]
  • PST Og Global Shield
    PST og Global Shield FOTO: THOMAS WINJE ØIJORD, SCANPIX Metoderapport SKUP-prisen 2011 Bergens Tidende Tron Strand Rune Christophersen Øyvind Lefdal Eidsvik 1. Navn på journalistene Tron Strand Rune Christophersen Øyvind Lefdal Eidsvik 2. Navn på prosjektet PST og Global Shield 3. Fullstendig publiseringsliste 26. august: Terrorjegere tipset politiet om Breivik (førstesideoppslag) 26. august: Breivik var på bombejegernes liste 26. august: Flere ble varslet om ham (bt.no) 26. august: - Meget alvorlig sak (bt.no) 26. august: - Breivik burde blitt avhørt (bt.no) 27. august: - De etterlatte rammes av PST 27. august: Tilliten er svekket 1. september: Kritiserer PST og Janne Kristiansen 2. september: Vil sparke PST-sjefen 2. september: Politiets Svekkede Tillit (kommentar) 7. september: Holdt tett om terrorsamarbeidet 8. september: Vil ikke kritisere PST 7. oktober: PST skal gi terrorsvar 12. oktober: - Har mye å svare for 19. oktober: Lovlig å importere bombekjemikalier 19. oktober: Nå blir kunstgjødsel forbudt (bt.no) 11. november: PST prioriterte bort bombetips 24. november: Rapport: Terroren kunne blitt avverget 24. november: Gransket firmaet Breivik bestilte fra (bt.no) 24. november: Flere ble varslet (bt.no) 24. november: - Avslører hull i beredskapen (bt.no) 25. november: PST kunne ha registrert Breivik 25. november: Vil ikke svare om PST-sjefens feil (bt.no) 26. november: Solgte kjemikalier til Norge i årevis 26. november: Stormløp mot PST-sjefen (bt.no) 26. november: Her tar de 1,8 tonn bomberåstoff (bt.no) 26. november: Vil øke straffen for sprengninger (bt.no) 27. november: SV krever grep mot PST (bt.no) 28. november: PST-sjefen må svare 28.
    [Show full text]
  • Impeding Lone-Wolf Attacks: Lessons Derived from the 2011 Norway Attacks Sunniva Meyer
    Meyer Crime Science 2013, 2:7 http://www.crimesciencejournal.com/content/2/1/7 RESEARCH Open Access Impeding lone-wolf attacks: lessons derived from the 2011 Norway attacks Sunniva Meyer Abstract Lone-wolf terrorism is often more difficult to detect through intelligence due to limited communication between plotters. This study addresses this problem by spelling out an alternative method for impeding such attacks. It combines crime scripts, situational crime prevention and rational planning to study how to impede attacks such as the 2011 Norway attacks. Analyzing the transport issues in these attacks demonstrates that some sort of entry control and measures facilitating the evacuation in case of prolonged attacks might reduce the harm. Keywords: Lone-wolf attacks; Situational crime prevention; Crime scripts; Rational planning; Terrorism Background attacker can inflict alone. The individual attacks carried “Not even the DDR during the years of the Stasi, which out by ABB are similar in that they were committed by we do not want to compare us with, could have stopped the same offender on the same day, but differ in that him”a Janne Kristiansen told the Norwegian newspaper, the offender employed two different conventional Dagbladet, after the 2011 Norway attacks. The offender, weapons: improvised explosives and small arms. The Anders Behring Breivik (ABB), had lived an apparently paper primarily focuses on transport issues due to law-abiding life, and avoided voicing violent opinions to space limitations. others (Klungtveit 2011, p. 16). And even if ABB left Most, if not all, of the measures discussed in this paper some tracks that could (and perhaps should) have will of course also apply to other malicious plots that warned the intelligence services of his plans (NOU failed to be detected.
    [Show full text]
  • Six Months Have Passed
    (Periodicals postage paid in Seattle, WA) TIME-DATED MATERIAL — DO NOT DELAY Editorial In Your Neighborhood On the Edge: New home for Ambitions for Et snøfnugg går The Little Viking Norway aldri alene på fest. Read more on page 6 – Simen Beeder Read more on page 13 Norwegian American Weekly Vol. 123 No. 4 January 27, 2012 Established May 17, 1889 • Formerly Western Viking and Nordisk Tidende $1.50 per copy Norway.com News Find more at www.norway.com Six months have passed News Changes in Hurtigruten said early on that they were skeptical about the Norway since the cause of fire as stated in the re- port from the Accident Investi- July 22 bombing gation Board. Now Det Norske and shootings Veritas delivered a report that outlines a different sequence of events. “The DNV report KELSEY LARSON confirms what our experienced Copy Editor chief has said, that the loose bolts on the fuel pump is a con- “Six months have passed since sequence of the fire, and not the last sign of life from you on that the cause,” said Operating Of- rainy summer day in July. This has ficer of Hurtigruten Day Arne been a difficult day, but I have been Wenzel to New Scientist. to your grave and brushed away (blog.norway.com/category/ the snow from the pictures, hearts, news) flowers, birds and other things that Culture we and your friends have left :-) Miss you – you are always in my A new survey shows that 12 heart. Love, mom.” percent of respondents partici- “I cannot believe that six pated in religious ceremonies months have passed.
    [Show full text]