DOCSLIB.ORG

FY 2020 BVP Awards

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FY 2020 BVP Awards FY 2020 BVP Awards State Jurisdiction Name (City) BVP Funding Amount AK ANCHORAGE MUNICIPALITY $20,451.42 AK FAIRBANKS CITY $7,920.00 AK JUNEAU CITY AND BOROUGH $2,770.20 AK KENAI CITY $3,605.00 AK KETCHIKAN CITY $3,969.00 AK PALMER CITY $1,982.50 AK PETERSBURG CITY $496.27 AK SEWARD CITY $2,060.00 AK SITKA CITY AND BOROUGH $3,137.50 AK SOLDOTNA CITY $1,200.00 AK WRANGELL CITY $2,070.00 Totals for AK(11 Jurisdictions): $49,661.89 AL ALABAMA $24,069.13 AL ALABASTER CITY $6,122.10 AL ALBERTVILLE CITY $7,400.00 AL ALEXANDER CITY $4,378.00 AL ANNISTON CITY $3,234.00 AL ATHENS CITY $9,550.00 AL AUBURN CITY $9,760.63 AL AUTAUGA COUNTY $8,302.50 AL BAY MINETTE CITY $4,333.00 AL BESSEMER CITY $17,500.00 AL BLOUNT COUNTY $5,723.05 AL BOAZ CITY $2,150.00 AL BRUNDIDGE CITY $662.50 AL BUTLER CITY $3,200.00 AL BUTLER COUNTY $2,026.50 AL CALERA CITY $2,100.00 AL CHICKASAW CITY $2,796.50 AL CHOCTAW COUNTY $1,677.00 AL COFFEE COUNTY $1,827.00 AL COOSA COUNTY $4,614.00 AL COTTONWOOD TOWN $750.00 AL CULLMAN CITY $7,308.00 AL CULLMAN COUNTY $4,462.50 AL DADEVILLE CITY $304.50 AL DAPHNE CITY $2,898.50 AL DE KALB COUNTY $4,990.00 AL DECATUR CITY $10,461.00 AL DEMOPOLIS CITY $1,587.50 AL DORA CITY $2,800.00 AL DOTHAN AIRPORT AUTHORITY $2,271.50 AL DOTHAN CITY $21,520.00 AL ENTERPRISE CITY $2,690.00 AL EUFAULA CITY $2,480.00 AL FAIRHOPE CITY $4,095.00 AL FLORENCE CITY $14,625.00 AL FOLEY CITY $5,107.50 AL FORT PAYNE CITY $5,685.00 AL FULTONDALE CITY $1,984.50 AL GADSDEN CITY $20,475.00 AL GILBER TOWN TOWN $1,200.00 AL GREENVILLE CITY $10,385.04 AL GUNTERSVILLE CITY $1,697.50 AL HALEYVILLE CITY $1,600.00 AL HARTSELLE CITY $1,226.16 AL HENRY COUNTY $2,397.00 AL HOOVER CITY $23,248.50 AL JACKSON CITY $877.50 AL JASPER CITY $8,650.00 AL JEFFERSON COUNTY $9,504.18 AL LANETT CITY $7,740.00 AL LEE COUNTY $581.86 AL LIMESTONE COUNTY $5,767.50 AL LOWNDES COUNTY $8,520.00 AL LUVERNE CITY $3,049.95 AL MADISON CITY $8,900.00 AL MOBILE COUNTY $5,556.33 AL MONTEVALLO CITY $868.99 AL MONTGOMERY COUNTY $872.79 AL MORGAN COUNTY $1,547.81 AL MOUNTAIN BROOK CITY $5,200.00 AL NEWTON TOWN $2,300.00 AL NORTHPORT CITY $3,295.00 AL OPELIKA CITY $9,105.00 AL OWENS CROSS ROADS TOWN $1,825.00 AL PELHAM CITY $6,700.00 AL PELL CITY $2,626.89 AL PHENIX CITY $5,652.50 AL PICKENS COUNTY $4,800.00 AL PRATTVILLE CITY $7,188.00 AL RAINBOW CITY $3,870.00 AL REFORM CITY $1,200.00 AL RUSSELLVILLE CITY $3,754.93 AL SATSUMA CITY $3,125.00 AL SCOTTSBORO CITY $3,836.25 AL SNEAD TOWN $595.00 AL SPRINGVILLE TOWN $4,400.00 AL SUMMERDALE TOWN $4,100.00 AL SYLACAUGA CITY $4,020.00 AL TALLADEGA CITY $8,975.00 AL TALLAPOOSA COUNTY $3,654.00 AL THOMASVILLE CITY $2,457.00 AL TROY CITY $5,888.96 AL TRUSSVILLE CITY $1,398.00 AL TUSCALOOSA CITY $980.28 AL TUSCALOOSA COUNTY $1,941.73 AL VESTAVIA HILLS CITY $11,082.00 AL WADLEY TOWN $1,687.50 Totals for AL(87 Jurisdictions): $457,770.56 AR ALMA CITY $1,483.11 AR ARKANSAS $22,460.53 AR AUGUSTA CITY $2,112.48 AR BARLING CITY $4,785.10 AR BATESVILLE CITY $5,424.21 AR BAY CITY $3,311.49 AR BENTON CITY $10,225.70 AR BENTON COUNTY $3,363.13 AR BERRYVILLE CITY $1,201.73 AR BOONE COUNTY $3,862.50 AR CABOT CITY $1,353.10 AR CAMMACK VILLAGE CITY $1,212.72 AR CARROLL COUNTY $6,867.00 AR CLEBURNE COUNTY $11,200.00 AR CONWAY CITY $18,400.00 AR CRITTENDEN COUNTY $6,067.28 AR DYER CITY $1,010.14 AR EL DORADO CITY $5,213.13 AR ELKINS CITY $483.38 AR FAULKNER COUNTY $4,471.43 AR FAYETTEVILLE CITY $21,200.00 AR FORDYCE CITY $3,600.00 AR FORT SMITH CITY $14,414.85 AR GARLAND COUNTY $6,972.47 AR GASSVILLE CITY $2,511.00 AR GRAVETTE CITY $2,000.00 AR GREENE COUNTY $13,976.97 AR HARRISON CITY $16,537.50 AR HEBER SPRINGS CITY $2,102.76 AR HOPE CITY $3,226.50 AR HOT SPRINGS CITY $9,906.50 AR HUNTSVILLE CITY $1,917.57 AR IZARD COUNTY $2,500.00 AR JACKSONVILLE CITY $9,236.39 AR JONESBORO CITY $21,800.00 AR LITTLE ROCK CITY $6,153.87 AR LOGAN COUNTY $2,064.98 AR MADISON CITY $2,715.75 AR MADISON COUNTY $4,919.50 AR MAGNOLIA CITY $3,450.56 AR MALVERN CITY $1,543.98 AR MARION CITY $3,824.21 AR MAUMELLE CITY $2,441.60 AR MENIFEE TOWN $3,500.00 AR MILLER COUNTY $1,900.55 AR MOUNTAIN HOME CITY $3,999.45 AR MOUNTAIN VIEW CITY $3,504.00 AR MURFREESBORO CITY $1,570.80 AR NEWPORT CITY $8,669.15 AR NORTH LITTLE ROCK CITY $22,539.00 AR OPPELO CITY $998.33 AR OSCEOLA CITY $2,653.91 AR OUACHITA COUNTY $13,585.00 AR PEA RIDGE CITY $2,758.98 AR PIGGOTT CITY $906.98 AR PINE BLUFF CITY $9,437.50 AR POLK COUNTY $541.26 AR POPE COUNTY $3,425.56 AR ROGERS CITY $4,724.93 AR RUSSELVILLE CITY $4,095.00 AR SEARCY CITY $7,034.13 AR SHERIDAN CITY $5,597.25 AR SHERWOOD CITY $4,778.80 AR SPRINGDALE CITY $18,000.00 AR ST CHARLES TOWN $800.00 AR TEXARKANA CITY $10,451.80 AR TYRONZA CITY $2,372.90 AR VAN BUREN CITY $7,647.50 AR WEST MEMPHIS CITY $17,720.00 AR WHITE COUNTY $7,220.20 AR WYNNE CITY $1,643.00 Totals for AR(71 Jurisdictions): $445,601.10 AZ APACHE JUNCTION CITY $7,996.46 AZ ARIZONA $9,483.86 AZ AVONDALE CITY $16,200.00 AZ BISBEE CITY $2,098.36 AZ BUCKEYE TOWN $11,606.68 AZ BULLHEAD CITY $8,000.00 AZ CASA GRANDE CITY $5,525.00 AZ CLARKDALE TOWN $1,500.00 AZ COCHISE COUNTY $218.03 AZ COOLIDGE CITY $3,754.59 AZ COTTONWOOD CITY $2,612.50 AZ FLAGSTAFF CITY $15,252.56 AZ FLORENCE TOWN $3,090.00 AZ GOODYEAR CITY $17,248.64 AZ GRAHAM COUNTY $6,734.36 AZ KEARNY TOWN $870.60 AZ KINGMAN CITY $8,800.00 AZ LA PAZ COUNTY $8,259.45 AZ LAKE HAVASU CITY $18,885.24 AZ MARANA TOWN $12,109.56 AZ MARICOPA CITY $8,533.93 AZ MOHAVE COUNTY $2,413.62 AZ NOGALES CITY $5,927.34 AZ ORO VALLEY TOWN $7,709.74 AZ PAGE CITY $2,888.33 AZ PARADISE VALLEY TOWN $5,458.50 AZ PARKER TOWN $3,860.00 AZ PAYSON TOWN $7,020.00 AZ PEORIA CITY $7,834.56 AZ PIMA COUNTY $33,377.68 AZ PINAL COUNTY $2,592.79 AZ PINETOP-LAKESIDE TOWN $1,600.00 AZ PRESCOTT CITY $7,851.45 AZ PRESCOTT VALLEY TOWN $17,650.17 AZ SANTA CRUZ COUNTY $10,066.44 AZ SHOW LOW CITY $5,400.00 AZ SIERRA VISTA CITY $8,000.00 AZ ST JOHNS CITY $2,603.76 AZ SURPRISE CITY $611.48 AZ WICKENBURG TOWN $2,782.97 AZ WILLIAMS CITY $1,800.00 AZ YUMA CITY $20,951.04 Totals for AZ(42 Jurisdictions): $327,179.69 CA ALAMEDA CITY $21,822.75 CA ALAMEDA COUNTY $50,274.90 CA ALBANY CITY $3,664.21 CA ALHAMBRA CITY $8,206.74 CA AMADOR COUNTY $19,294.82 CA ANAHEIM CITY $11,090.47 CA ANDERSON CITY $836.20 CA ANGELS CITY $1,633.00 CA ANTIOCH CITY $3,182.70 CA ARCADIA CITY $3,994.60 CA ARCATA CITY $2,100.00 CA ARVIN CITY $2,851.49 CA ATWATER CITY $4,850.00 CA AUBURN CITY $1,215.04 CA AZUSA CITY $6,000.00 CA BARSTOW CITY $3,060.10 CA BEAUMONT CITY $5,678.18 CA BELL GARDENS CITY $3,376.13 CA BELLFLOWER CITY $2,807.58 CA BEVERLY HILLS CITY $9,101.88 CA BISHOP CITY $2,779.14 CA BRISBANE CITY $1,909.56 CA BROADMOOR POLICE PROTEC DIST $11,965.53 CA BUENA PARK CITY $2,796.73 CA BURLINGAME CITY $2,452.50 CA CALAVERAS COUNTY $9,724.78 CA CALIFORNIA $234,396.58 CA CAMPBELL CITY $6,870.53 CA CARMEL BY THE SEA CITY $2,712.01 CA CATHEDRAL CITY $3,000.00 CA CERES CITY $9,902.59 CA CHOWCHILLA CITY $3,659.22 CA CHULA VISTA CITY $14,845.70 CA CITRUS HEIGHTS CITY $9,899.54 CA CLAREMONT CITY $4,161.78 CA CLEARLAKE CITY $2,020.60 CA COALINGA CITY $2,812.50 CA COLMA TOWN $2,341.35 CA COLTON CITY $19,351.75 CA COLUSA COUNTY $5,514.69 CA COMPTON UNIFIED SCH DIST $3,869.87 CA CORONA CITY $7,434.62 CA CORONADO CITY $4,856.74 CA COSTA MESA CITY $1,995.16 CA COVINA CITY $5,600.00 CA CRESCENT CITY $1,312.50 CA CULVER CITY $16,058.67 CA CYPRESS CITY $5,152.00 CA DEL NORTE COUNTY $4,070.07 CA DESERT HOT SPRINGS CITY $3,376.54 CA DIXON CITY $2,020.77 CA DOWNEY CITY $1,883.16 CA DUBLIN CITY $5,599.50 CA EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DIST $1,956.75 CA EL DORADO COUNTY $3,716.88 CA EMERYVILLE CITY $15,245.50 CA ESCALON CITY $2,157.50 CA ETNA CITY $2,109.68 CA EUREKA CITY $6,686.00 CA EXETER CITY $2,861.98 CA FAIRFAX TOWN $1,513.30 CA FARMERSVILLE CITY $3,090.50 CA FOLSOM CITY $10,043.60 CA FORT BRAGG CITY $3,450.00 CA FORTUNA CITY $1,899.44 CA FOSTER CITY $9,035.96 CA FOUNTAIN VALLEY CITY $1,577.96 CA FRESNO COUNTY $31,454.38 CA FULLERTON CITY $2,265.37 CA GALT CITY $5,026.73 CA GARDENA CITY $8,417.57 CA GILROY CITY $6,488.70 CA GLENDORA CITY $14,885.69 CA GLENN COUNTY $16,167.75 CA GRIDLEY CITY $1,322.50 CA GROVER BEACH CITY $3,904.99 CA GUSTINE CITY $2,254.49 CA HANFORD CITY $6,548.02 CA HAWTHORNE CITY $10,724.55 CA HAYWARD AREA RECREATION AND PARK DISTRICT $1,036.41 CA HAYWARD CITY $3,716.01 CA HEMET CITY $10,124.66 CA HERCULES CITY $3,664.65 CA HOLLISTER CITY $4,500.00 CA HUMBOLDT COUNTY $4,131.35 CA HUNTINGTON PARK CITY $8,269.25 CA HURON CITY $2,825.00 CA IMPERIAL COUNTY $2,784.38 CA INDIO CITY $8,358.50 CA INGLEWOOD CITY $4,980.68 CA KERMAN CITY $2,002.86 CA KERN COUNTY $741.05 CA KINGS COUNTY $3,091.69 CA KINGSBURG CITY $2,702.89 CA LA HABRA CITY $5,282.30 CA LAGUNA BEACH CITY $5,290.29 CA LAKE SHASTINA CMTY SERVICES $641.83 CA LAKEPORT CITY $2,992.50 CA LARKSPUR CITY $2,796.20 CA LEMOORE CITY $5,556.91 CA LIVERMORE CITY $17,575.00 CA LODI CITY $7,782.50 CA LOMPOC CITY $7,042.65 CA LOS ALTOS CITY $3,167.75 CA LOS ANGELES CITY $91,504.36 CA LOS ANGELES UNIF SCH DIST $30,105.61 CA LOS BANOS CITY $7,582.50 CA LOS GATOS TOWN $4,031.96 CA MADERA COUNTY $1,737.25 CA MANHATTAN BEACH CITY $6,515.00 CA MANTECA CITY $8,691.00 CA MARINA CITY $4,516.40 CA MARIPOSA COUNTY $10,501.31 CA MARTINEZ CITY $527.41 CA MARYSVILLE CITY $5,567.50 CA MENDOCINO COUNTY $14,941.15 CA MENIFEE CITY $2,284.75 CA MENLO PARK CITY $2,186.75 CA MERCED CITY $7,599.70 CA MILPITAS CITY $9,405.45 CA MONO COUNTY $3,836.25 CA MONTCLAIR CITY $6,501.60 CA MONTEBELLO CITY $8,595.51 CA MONTEREY CITY $2,622.00 CA MONTEREY PARK CITY $5,238.38 CA MORGAN HILL CITY $2,034.46 CA
Load more

Recommended publications
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT of INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION in Re FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., EMPLOYMEN
    USDC IN/ND case 3:05-md-00527-RLM-MGG document 3279 filed 03/22/19 page 1 of 354 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION ) Case No. 3:05-MD-527 RLM In re FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE ) (MDL 1700) SYSTEM, INC., EMPLOYMENT ) PRACTICES LITIGATION ) ) ) THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ) ) Carlene Craig, et. al. v. FedEx Case No. 3:05-cv-530 RLM ) Ground Package Systems, Inc., ) ) PROPOSED FINAL APPROVAL ORDER This matter came before the Court for hearing on March 11, 2019, to consider final approval of the proposed ERISA Class Action Settlement reached by and between Plaintiffs Leo Rittenhouse, Jeff Bramlage, Lawrence Liable, Kent Whistler, Mike Moore, Keith Berry, Matthew Cook, Heidi Law, Sylvia O’Brien, Neal Bergkamp, and Dominic Lupo1 (collectively, “the Named Plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and the Certified Class, and Defendant FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. (“FXG”) (collectively, “the Parties”), the terms of which Settlement are set forth in the Class Action Settlement Agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) attached as Exhibit A to the Joint Declaration of Co-Lead Counsel in support of Preliminary Approval of the Kansas Class Action 1 Carlene Craig withdrew as a Named Plaintiff on November 29, 2006. See MDL Doc. No. 409. Named Plaintiffs Ronald Perry and Alan Pacheco are not movants for final approval and filed an objection [MDL Doc. Nos. 3251/3261]. USDC IN/ND case 3:05-md-00527-RLM-MGG document 3279 filed 03/22/19 page 2 of 354 Settlement [MDL Doc. No. 3154-1]. Also before the Court is ERISA Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion for Attorney’s Fees and for Payment of Service Awards to the Named Plaintiffs, filed with the Court on October 19, 2018 [MDL Doc.
    [Show full text]
  • Boulder County Transit
    For more information on RTD passes, visit www.rtd-denver.com. visit passes, RTD on information more For **Prices based on 2018 pricing are subject to change. to subject are pricing 2018 on based **Prices provides the 12th month of service free of charge! of free service of month 12th the provides N U Q O R P S T pass is paid for in advance at the cost of 11 months of service and and service of months 11 of cost the at advance in for paid is pass C to GoldHill to Climb bus N bus to Nederland N busto a An annual pass available in any pass category (local, and regional). This This regional). and (local, category pass any in available pass annual An Nedarland HS DOWNTOWN BOULDER STATION BOULDERSTATION DOWNTOWN n y VALUPASS o E n Ski Area Eldora To l d C B Station Boulder Downtown o a routes. Visit www.bcecopass.com for more information. more for www.bcecopass.com Visit routes. l r r NEDERLAND TRANSIT LEGEND SERVICE a i v FLEX N GS FF6 FF5 FF4 FF2 FF1 AB1/AB2 225/225D/225E 209 208 206 205/205T 204 CLIMB BOLT DASH STAMPEDE BOUND JUMP LONG SKIP HOP b J JUMP Y 236 Park-n-Ride GATE ASSINGMENTS GATE d R o provides unlimited usage of all RTD Local, Regional, Rail, and Airport Airport and Rail, Regional, Local, RTD all of usage unlimited provides u d R 204•205•208•225•BOLT•HOP P d a neighborhood of 40+ houses. This pass is valid for one year and and year one for valid is pass This houses.
    [Show full text]
  • A TIMELINE for GOLDEN, COLORADO (Revised October 2003)
    A TIMELINE FOR GOLDEN, COLORADO (Revised October 2003) "When a society or a civilization perishes, one condition can always be found. They forgot where they came from." Carl Sandburg This time-line was originally created by the Golden Historic Preservation Board for the 1995 Golden community meetings concerning growth. It is intended to illustrate some of the events and thoughts that helped shape Golden. Major historical events and common day-to-day happenings that influenced the lives of the people of Golden are included. Corrections, additions, and suggestions are welcome and may be relayed to either the Historic Preservation Board or the Planning Department at 384-8097. The information concerning events in Golden was gathered from a variety of sources. Among those used were: • The Colorado Transcript • The Golden Transcript • The Rocky Mountain News • The Denver Post State of Colorado Web pages, in particular the Colorado State Archives The League of Women Voters annual reports Golden, The 19th Century: A Colorado Chronicle. Lorraine Wagenbach and Jo Ann Thistlewood. Harbinger House, Littleton, 1987 The Shining Mountains. Georgina Brown. B & B Printers, Gunnison. 1976 The 1989 Survey of Historic Buildings in Downtown Golden. R. Laurie Simmons and Christine Whitacre, Front Range Research Associates, Inc. Report on file at the City of Golden Planning and Development Department. Survey of Golden Historic Buildings. by R. Laurie Simmons and Christine Whitacre, Front Range Research Associates, Inc. Report on file at the City of Golden Planning and Development Department. Golden Survey of Historic Buildings, 1991. R. Laurie Simmons and Thomas H. Simmons. Front Range Research Associates, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Hydrology, Front Range Urban Corridor, Colorado
    Bibliography and Index of Geology and Hydrology, Front Range Urban Corridor, Colorado By FELICIE CHRONIC and JOHN CHRONIC GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1306 Bibliographic citations for more than 1,800 indexed reports, theses, and open-file releases concerning one of the Nation's most rapidly growing areas UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1974 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 74-600045 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D. C. 20402- Price $1.15 (paper cover) Stock Number 2401-02545 PREFACE This bibliography is intended for persons wishing geological information about the Front Range Urban Corridor. It was compiled at the University of Colorado, funded by the U.S. Geological Survey, and is based primarily on references in the Petroleum Research Microfilm Library of the Rocky Mountain Region. Extensive use was made also of U.S. Geological Survey and American Geological Institute bibliographies, as well as those of the Colorado Geological Survey. Most of the material listed was published or completed before July 1, 1972; references to some later articles, as well as to a few which were not found in the first search, are appended at the end of the alphabetical listing. This bibliography may include more references than some users feel are warranted, but the authors felt that the greatest value to the user would result from a comprehensive rather than a selective listing. Hence, we decided to include the most significant synthesizing articles and books in order to give a broad picture of the geology of the Front Range Urban Corridor, and to include also some articles which deal with geology of areas adjacent to, and probably pertinent to, the corridor.
    [Show full text]
  • All Grants Awarded Through Fiscal Year 2020 INTRODUCTION and KEY
    All Grants Awarded Through Fiscal Year 2020 INTRODUCTION AND KEY This report is a list of all grants awarded by the Colorado Historical Society’s State Historical Fund (SHF) since its inception in 1992 (state Fiscal Year 1993) through the end of Fiscal Year 2020. The amounts listed are the original award amounts. If for some reason the entire grant amount was not used (i.e. a project was terminated or was completed under budget) the full amount awarded will appear. In other instances grant awards were increased either to enable project completion or to cover the costs of easements. In these instances, the additional award amount is shown in a separate entry as an increase. In those cases where no work was accomplished and the funds were either declined by the grant recipient or were required to be returned to the SHF through rescissions, no entry will appear. For this reason, projects listed in one version of this report may not appear in later versions, and the financial information shown in this report may not be comparable to other revenue reports issued by the SHF. Grants listed in this report are identified by project ID number. The first two characters in the project ID number represent the fiscal year from which the grant was scheduled to be paid. The state is on a July 1 – June 30 fiscal year. So, for example, all grants made between July 1, 2006 and June 30, 2007 will be coded “07”. The next two characters identify the type of grant. In the case of grants that are awarded based on specific application due dates, the grant round in which the project was funded will be paired with either a letter or number.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Cowley: Living Free During Slavery in Eighteenth-Century Richmond, Virginia
    Virginia Commonwealth University VCU Scholars Compass Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2020 Robert Cowley: Living Free During Slavery in Eighteenth-Century Richmond, Virginia Ana F. Edwards Virginia Commonwealth University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd Part of the African American Studies Commons, Other American Studies Commons, Social History Commons, and the United States History Commons © The Author Downloaded from https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/6362 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at VCU Scholars Compass. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of VCU Scholars Compass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Robert Cowley: Living Free During Slavery in Eighteenth-Century Richmond, Virginia A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts from the Department of History at Virginia Commonwealth University. by Ana Frances Edwards Wilayto Bachelor of Arts, California State Polytechnic University at Pomona, 1983 Director of Record: Ryan K. Smith, Ph. D., Professor, Department of History, Virginia Commonwealth University Adviser: Nicole Myers Turner, Ph. D., Professor, Department of Religious Studies, Yale University Outside Reader: Michael L. Blakey, Ph. D., Professor, Department of Anthropology, College of William & Mary Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond, Virginia June 2020 © Ana Frances Edwards Wilayto 2020 All Rights Reserved 2 of 115 For Grandma Thelma and Grandpa Melvin, Grandma Mildred and Grandpa Paul. For Mom and Dad, Allma and Margit. For Walker, Taimir and Phil. Acknowledgements I am grateful to the professors--John Kneebone, Carolyn Eastman, John Herman, Brian Daugherty, Bernard Moitt, Ryan Smith, and Sarah Meacham--who each taught me something specific about history, historiography, academia and teaching.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Sexual Abuse Claims in Chapter 11 Cases of Boy Scouts of America
    Summary of Sexual Abuse Claims in Chapter 11 Cases of Boy Scouts of America There are approximately 101,135sexual abuse claims filed. Of those claims, the Tort Claimants’ Committee estimates that there are approximately 83,807 unique claims if the amended and superseded and multiple claims filed on account of the same survivor are removed. The summary of sexual abuse claims below uses the set of 83,807 of claim for purposes of claims summary below.1 The Tort Claimants’ Committee has broken down the sexual abuse claims in various categories for the purpose of disclosing where and when the sexual abuse claims arose and the identity of certain of the parties that are implicated in the alleged sexual abuse. Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a chart that shows the sexual abuse claims broken down by the year in which they first arose. Please note that there approximately 10,500 claims did not provide a date for when the sexual abuse occurred. As a result, those claims have not been assigned a year in which the abuse first arose. Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a chart that shows the claims broken down by the state or jurisdiction in which they arose. Please note there are approximately 7,186 claims that did not provide a location of abuse. Those claims are reflected by YY or ZZ in the codes used to identify the applicable state or jurisdiction. Those claims have not been assigned a state or other jurisdiction. Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a chart that shows the claims broken down by the Local Council implicated in the sexual abuse.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2014, Volume 104 Number 2
    New water center launched Runner beats brain tumor 16-year-old Santiago graduating Summer 2014 Volume 104 Number 2 BuildingBuilding 140Colorado years of SchoolMines of Mines Magazine History through architecture Colorado School of Mines Magazine st Earth Science and GIS Software 3ANNIVERSARY1 ® ROCKWORKS • Starting at $700 RockWorks provides visualization and modeling of spatial and subsurface data. Save time and money, increase profitability, and provide a competitive edge through high-quality graphics, models, and plots. Mapping Tools • Structure and isopach maps: contour maps with lines and color fills • 3D surface displays • Bubble maps of any well data (production, etc.) • Well and lease spotting from Range, Township, Section descriptions • Land grid and lease maps with section boundaries • Coordinate systems: longitude/latitude, UTM, State Plane • Well location maps: well status, plan-view horizontal well traces • Grid model tools: filters, math operations, editor, imports/exports Well Database Tools • Cross sections: hole to hole and projected • 3D fence diagrams • Correlations: model-based and “EZ” panels • Horizontal and vertical wells: 2D and 3D, flexible log layout • Stratigraphic modeling of all/selected formations • Solid modeling of lithologic, geophysical, geotechnical, • Geosteering: well paths/3D displays based on target formations Other Tools • Structural geology diagrams • Graphic output: 2D and 3D output to RockWorks, Google Earth • 2D editing tools: contour lines, text, shapes, legends, images • Snapping tools for hand-drawn correlations • Composite scenes in 3D with maps, logs, surfaces, solids, etc. • Exports to GIS Shapefiles, CAD DXF, raster formats, Google Earth • Image import, rectification, depth-registration Download FREE Trial at www.RockWare.com 2221 East Street // Golden CO 80401 U.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Fv Golden Fact Sheet 2019
    Golden At A Glance… Location: Located in an area of spectacular natural beauty, Golden is where the mountains meet the plains in pretty Clear Creek Valley. The town is completely surrounded by high points – to the east are two high volcanic mesas (North and South Table Mountains). To the west are the foothills, dominated by Mount Zion and Lookout Mountain. Lookout Mountain can be climbed by car, the others by trails. Clear Creek flows directly through the town and is lined with paved bike and hiking trails. Golden is one of Colorado’ oldest and most historic towns and is filled with a large number of historic buildings. The town occupies approximately 8 square miles and located 12 miles west of Denver at an official elevation of 5,675 feet above sea level. Population: Approximately 20,500 History: Golden was founded in 1859 and was the territorial capitol of Colorado from 1862 until 1867. It was originally called “Golden City,” not only because it was a supply center for miners of the region during the Pikes Peak Gold Rush, but also, ironically, because one of the first prospectors to pan for gold in this area was named Thomas L. Golden. Museums/Attractions: Golden is proud to be home to many museums and attractions. Coors Brewery Tour: Coors is the largest single-site brewery in the world and one of Colorado’s most popular attractions. Since 1873, Coors Brewing Company has thrived on a legacy of quality, innovation and customer service, transforming authentic Rocky Mountain spring water into a wide variety of beers known around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • American Clan Gregor Society
    YEAR BOOK OFTHE American Clan Gregor Society CONTAINING THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1945 ANNUAL GAT HERING THE AMERICAN CLAN GREGOR SOCIETY JOHN BOWIE F ER NEYIIOUGH, Editor Richmond, Virginia COPYRIGHT, 1946 BY J. BOWIE FERNEYHOUGH, Editor Cussons, May & Co., Richmond, Va. OFFICERS SIR :M ALCOLM MACGREGOR OF MACGREGOR, BARONET H ereditary Chief Lochear nhead, Scotla nd FRANK CECIL MAGRUDER..••.•••.. •.•.. ••••................. ................•.Chieftain 5308 N. Capitol s-, Washington 11, D. C. MARION MILTON M A GRU DER Rankinq Deputy Chieftain MRS. L. JANE M AGRUDER H A Y DE N S cribe MRS. O. O. VAN DEN 'BER G R egistrar 2122 Californ ia Street, N.W ., Washington 8, D. C. MISS R EGINA MAGRUDER HILL Historian 2122 California St. , N. W. , W ashington 8, D. C. JOH N EDWIN MUNCASTER Tr easurer " The Ridge," R. F. D., Der wood, Maryland JOH N BOWIE FERNEYHOUGH E ditor 4032 Northrop St., Richmond, Virginia R EV. ENOCH MAGRUDER THOMPSO N Chaplain MRS. CLEMENT W . S 'HERIFF Deputy Scribe DR. ROGER GREGORY MAGRUDER, M. D Surgeon FORMER CHIEFTAINS EDWARD M AY MAGRUDER, M.D. (Deceased) CALEB CLARKE MAGRUDER, M . A., LL.D. JAMES MITCHELL M AGRUDER, D. D. EGBERT WATSON MAGRUDER, PH. D. HERBERT THOMAS MAGRUDER WILLIAM MARION IVIAGRUDER THE COUNCIL CALEB CLARKE MAGRUDER, Ex-Officio REV. JAMES MITCHELL MAGRUDER, D . D., Ex-Officio EGBERT WATSON MAGRUDER, Ex-O fficio HERBERT THOMAS MAGRUDER, Ex-Officio WILLIAM MARION MAGRUDER, Ex-Officio MRS. PIIILIP HILL SHERIFF MISS REBECCA M. MAGGREGOR MARION MYRL HARRISON MRS. A. M. MAGRUDER WILSON WILLIAM WOODWARD JAMES MOSBY MAGRUDER DR. ROBERT E . FERNEYHOUGH MRS.
    [Show full text]
  • EXTENSIONS of REMARKS 14085 the Committee Recommends That the Au
    May 20, 1968 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS 14085 The committee recommends that the au- . PURPOSE lishing a customs Cooperation Oouncil. thority be continued. It believes, however, This bill would change the name of the The Council is the major international that the authority should not be made per- · Army Medical Service to the Army Medical manent because the justification for use of organization for improving and simplify­ Department. ing oust.oms procedures. It started out as this authority in Vletnam might not neces­ EXPLANATION sarily exist in other ·areas where a permanent largely a European organization. Now 53 authority could apply. The Army Organization Act of 1950 changed countries are members. Almost all our the name of the Medical Department of the COST Army to the Army Medical Service. The pur­ major trading partners participate in its The average transportation cost for a pose of the change was to eliminate the pos­ work. member of the uniformed services who ex­ sible confusion that might result from use The objectives of the Convention are tends his tour of duty under the authority of the term "Department" when this term to assist international trade by working this bill would extend is approximately $570. was also used in connection with the De­ for: This cost is offset by reductions in the partment of Defense and the m111tary de­ -uniformity and simplicity in the transportation of replacements and in the partments. customs systems of its members; relocation of dependents of replacements. The 1950 change has had an opposite ef­ -solutions to customs administration The Department of Defense considers that fect from the one intended.
    [Show full text]
  • South Table Mountain Is Getting New Trails
    JULY 2020 INSIDE THIS ISSUE SOUTH TABLE MOUNTAIN South Table Mntn. 1 Mount Morrison 6 IS GETTING NEW TRAILS 2020 Greenprint 7 Heritage Square 8 PLAN Jeffco Comments on OSAC Notes 10 Proposed South Table Park Progress in Open Space 11 Trails Plan April 24, 2020 trails have developed over the years by Dear Mr. Hoby, trespassers and other users. These have led to: 1) fragmented nesting areas and other natural Please consider this correspondence as the PLAN Jeffco Board of Directors (“Board”) position regarding the features; 2) trails that cross seasonally wet areas; proposed South Table Park Trails Plan. and 3) routes susceptible to erosion. PLAN Jeffco was formed 48 years ago with the PLAN Jeffco heartily supports Open Space plans goal of preserving much of the open area in to Jefferson County for public use. During our · Increase the present 7 miles of designated campaign for the Open Space Resolution in 1972, trails to 15.6 miles; we typically referred to South Table Mountain as a · Restore about 20 miles of undesignated perfect candidate for preservation. However, the (social) trails to heal the abuse; need for willing sellers made the assemblage of South Table Mountain Park a slow process and · Implement seasonal closures to protect prevented some desirable acquisitions. the nesting birds; South Table Mountain Park is probably the most · Implement “Stay on Trail” management, accessible park in the Open Space system, which as most of the park land is very fragile. has led to uncontrolled over use. The park's lands have been misused over the past 100 plus years, Very Truly Yours, making this the most abused property that Open s/Peter Ruben Morales Space has acquired.
    [Show full text]