Master Thesis Identifying Patients in Community Pharmacies to Become

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Master Thesis Identifying Patients in Community Pharmacies to Become UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN FACULTY OF HEALTH AND MEDICAL SCIENCES Master Thesis Nina Scheel Andersen (vsg237) Identifying patients in community pharmacies to become active participants in new medicines development Development and evaluation of a new recruitment technique derived from a public-private partnership Department of Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen Internal supervisor: Susanne Kaae External supervisor: Camilla Krogh Lauritzen Submitted on: 31 August 2020 Name of department: Department of Pharmacy Author(s): Nina Scheel Andersen (vsg237) Title and subtitle: Identifying patients in community pharmacies to become active participants in new medicines development – Development and evaluation of a new recruitment technique derived from a public- private partnership. Topic description: This thesis is written within the field of social and clinical pharmacy. The thesis concerns the development and evaluation of a new recruitment technique to recruit patients through community pharma- cies to be engaged in medicines research and development in a pharmaceutical company. Internal supervisor: Susanne Kaae External supervisor: Camilla Krogh Lauritzen Submitted on: 31 August 2020 Grade: Number of study units: £ 2 £ 3 Number of characters: 152,934 2 Preface This master thesis had a volume of 45 ECTS credits and was conducted from 31 August 2019 to 31 August 2020, partly at the Department of Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; and at LEO Pharma A/S, Ballerup, Denmark. The supervisors were Susanne Kaae as the internal supervisor from the University of Copenhagen, and Camilla Krogh Lauritzen as the external supervisor from LEO Pharma A/S. I would like to use this preface to thank all the people who supported me during my master thesis. This period has been a very interesting, educational, and exciting part of my life but occasionally also one of the hardest. However, it was all worth it, and I could not have done it without the huge help and support from the following people. First, a huge thank you to all the patients who showed an interest and participated in my project. Your help was tremendous. My deepest gratitude to my internal supervisor Susanne Kaae who was there for me all along with unlimited support, both academically and emotionally. Further, I would like to express a huge thank you to LEO Pharma’s Patient Engagement Team, Camilla Krogh Lauritzen, Lasse Funch Jacobsen, Søren Holm, and Torben Löser, who provided their full support during the project. Especially, my deepest gratitude to Camilla for being my external supervisor and allowing me to write my thesis within your team. Further, I would like to thank the additional LEO Pharma employees who supported me. A great thank you to Jacob Lenau and Skovlunde Pharmacy, as much as Ute Pørksen and Ballerup Pharmacy, for letting me use your pharmacies and supporting me significantly. A great thank you to Bente Buus Nielsen and Michael Koehler from FAIM for your excessive support during the project. A great thank you to Ballerup Municipality, especially Jette Rau, with your countless support during the project. Finally, a heartfelt thank you to my family and friends who supported me impressively all along the thesis period. Nina Scheel Andersen | Copenhagen, Denmark | August 2020 3 Abstract Aim/Background: The aim of this thesis is to concept-test and investigate how people with a rare disease diagnosis can be identified in a community pharmacy to be engaged in medicines research and development in a pharmaceutical company. To that end, a new project was estab- lished as a public-private partnership between the master thesis student, Ballerup Pharmacy, Skovlunde Pharmacy, Ballerup Municipality, the patient organisation of autoimmune diseases in Denmark (FAIM), and LEO Pharma. Methods: A Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle was used to develop the recruitment technique for recruit- ing patients to medicines research and development. Plan contains the preparational meetings leading up to the project start where several decisions were made. Do contains the practical, non- scientific parts of the project, which were the training of pharmacy staff, marketing campaign, recruitment process, patient introduction, patient preparation, and workshops at LEO Pharma. Study contains the scientific methods of the project, which were the following; semi-structured interviews with the project’s partners and patients; focus groups with the patients; and a quantita- tive overview of the patient contact. Act contains the recommendations for the further develop- ment of the project. Results: During the three-month recruitment phase, 17 patients inside the scope of the project made contact to participate whereof nine patients ended up participating in interviews, and hereof five patients in workshops as well. The community pharmacies were considered positive places of recruitment by both patients and the project’s partners. According to the patients, the workshops lived fully or almost fully up to their expectations, and the scientists from LEO Pharma were described as listening and understanding. However, the patients were unable to mention who the project’s partners were, but they found the partners’ involvement positive. Overall, the project’s partners were positive with the execution of the project and surprised by a larger number of patients being recruited than expected. The partners believed that the project has a future as a new concept of recruiting patients to medicines research and development. Conclusions: The concept-testing of recruiting people with a rare disease diagnosis through community pharmacies to be engaged in medicines research and development was accom- plished. Overall, patients and partners found the project positive, and it has the potential to become a new practice of recruitment for patient engagement in new medicines development. 4 Table of contents PREFACE ............................................................................................................................. 3 ABSTRACT .......................................................................................................................... 4 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................. 7 LIST OF APPENDICES ........................................................................................................ 8 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 9 1.1 Thesis statement ......................................................................................................................................................... 10 1.2 Research questions ..................................................................................................................................................... 10 1.3 Purpose ........................................................................................................................................................................ 10 2. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................. 11 2.1 History of patient engagement .................................................................................................................................. 11 2.2 Legislation on patient engagement ........................................................................................................................... 13 2.3 Roadmap for patient engagement in medicines R&D ............................................................................................ 14 2.4 Coverage of existing literature .................................................................................................................................. 16 2.4.1 Stakeholder expectations ...................................................................................................................................... 17 2.4.2 Best practices of patient engagement ................................................................................................................... 19 2.4.3 A master framework needed ................................................................................................................................. 19 2.4.4 Recruiting patients ................................................................................................................................................ 19 2.5 Roles and responsibilities in the project ................................................................................................................... 20 2.6 About the partners of the project ............................................................................................................................. 22 2.7 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................................................... 24 3. METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................... 25 3.1 Plan .............................................................................................................................................................................. 26 3.2 Do ................................................................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • RSAP1359 Proof 41..55
    MEDICINES AUTHORITY REGULATOR AND INDUSTRY PERCEPTIONS OF BIOSIMILAR INTERCHANGEABILITY Druedahl, Louise C.; De Bruin, Marie L.; Hoogland, Hans; Minssen, Timo; van de Weert, Marco; Sporrong, Sofia Kalvemark; Almarsdottir, Anna Birna DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.09.006 Publication date: 2019 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Document license: CC BY Citation for published version (APA): Druedahl, L. C., De Bruin, M. L., Hoogland, H., Minssen, T., van de Weert, M., Sporrong, S. K., & Almarsdottir, A. B. (2019). MEDICINES AUTHORITY REGULATOR AND INDUSTRY PERCEPTIONS OF BIOSIMILAR INTERCHANGEABILITY. E45-E46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.09.006 Download date: 28. sep.. 2021 Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy 15 (2019) e41ee55 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy journal homepage: www.rsap.org 9th Nordic Social Pharmacy Conference 2019. Conference abstracts ATTITUDES TOWARDS DEPRESCRIBING IN OLDER ADULTS WITH Pottegård a,c. a Hospital Pharmacy Funen, Odense University Hospital, LIMITED LIFE EXPECTANCY: TWO SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS Odense, Denmark; b OPEN, Odense Patient data Explorative Network, Odense, Denmark; c Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Department of Alaa Burghle a,b, Carina Lundby a,b, Jesper Ryg c,d, Jens Søndergaard e, Anton Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Pottegård a,b, Trine Graabæk a,b, Dorthe Nielsen f,g,h. a Hospital Pharmacy d Research and Development, Danish College of Pharmacy Practice, Hillerød, Funen, Odense University Hospital, Odense C, Denmark; b Clinical Denmark; e Social and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Copenhagen Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Department of Public Health, University of University, Copenhagen, Denmark Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark; c Department of Geriatric E-mail address: [email protected] (A.
    [Show full text]
  • Master Thesis
    Master Thesis University-Industry collaborations – What are potential conflicts and how to mitigate them? A study on the Danish pharmaceutical industry Master Thesis – Management of Innovation and Business Development (MIB) Supervisor: Christoph Grimpe Hand in: 02.05.2017 Overall number of pages: 114 No. of Characters: 249.408 Kristina Homann Fabian Steinhart Copenhagen Business School May 02nd 2017 Abstract: The purpose of this master thesis is to find answers for two underlying research questions, namely the conflicts companies experience when engaging in University-Industry collaborations, hereafter referred to as U-I collaborations, and the levers firms can pull to increase the attractiveness of U-I collaborations. To provide the theoretical basis for the answering of the research questions, the formation process, different types, motivations as well as outcomes for U-I collaborations from a firm’s perspective are considered. Following this, a selection of theoretical internal and external conflicts and corresponding levers is provided. Taking a more practical approach, the above mentioned theoretical basis is analyzed and discussed in the remaining part of this master thesis, using a deductive research approach. Based on a preparatory scoping interview process, three Danish pharmaceutical companies, namely Novo Nordisk, Lundbeck and LEO Pharma, have been selected for a semi-structured qualitative interview process. Thereby, the conflicts the companies are facing, namely the difficult interactions with the legal departments of the universities and the firm internal dissemination of the knowledge gathered during the U-I collaboration, are found as the main conflicts from the companies’ perspective resulting in a need to consider the implementation of counteracting levers.
    [Show full text]
  • EXECUTIVE INFORMATIONAL OVERVIEW Development, Clinical Practice, and Venture Development
    TopoTarget A/S Symbion Science Park 3 Fruebjergvej DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark Phone: +45 39 17 83 90 www.TopoTarget.com Unique Oncological Biopharmaceutical Opportunity Snapshot January 26, 2005 TopoTarget A/S is a privately held biopharmaceutical company focused on developing novel pharmaceuticals for cancer† and cancer-related indications, as well as on the identification of new indications for existing compounds. The Company’s first internally developed product, Topotect, is in Phase III as an antidote for extravasation, a severe form of tissue damage resulting from an incorrect administration of cytotoxic anthracyclines or chemotherapy drugs. Pending approval, the Company could launch Topotect in winter 2005/2006. This product, based on the concept of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) damage control, would provide TopoTarget access to profitable, lower-risk markets. TopoTarget is also developing Topotect for the treatment of brain metastases, a life-threatening condition that affects approximately 60% of primary small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients. Topotect recently entered Phase I/II clinical trials for this indication. Additionally, TopoTarget is heavily involved in the management of chromatins, the proteins responsible for the formation of DNA-containing chromosomes. The Company’s expertise in this area has led to the development of PXD101, a Phase I anti-cancer histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor that interferes with cell cycle arrest and angiogenesis, and has demonstrated anti-tumor activity in vivo. TopoTarget expects to employ this drug to target a variety of cancer indications, including multiple myeloma, malignant lymphoma, and ovarian, colorectal, and prostate cancer. TopoTarget also has a library of diverse HDAC inhibitors that have demonstrated efficacy in a variety of cancer and non-cancer indications.
    [Show full text]
  • Stage New Drug Discovery
    Public Support for Late- Stage New Drug Discovery The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Nayak, Rahul K. 2019. Public Support for Late-Stage New Drug Discovery. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard Medical School. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:41971479 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Scholarly Report submitted in partial fulfillment of the MD Degree at Harvard Medical School Date: 27 March 2019 Student Name: Rahul K Nayak, BSE Scholarly Report Title: Public support for late-stage new drug discovery Mentor Name(s) and Affiliations: Aaron S. Kesselheim, MD, JD, MPH, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA Collaborators, with Affiliations: Jerry Avorn, MD, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 1 Abstract Title: Public support for late-stage new drug discovery Rahul K Nayak, Jerry Avorn, Aaron S. Kesselheim Purpose: To determine the role of publicly-supported research in the development of innovative new medications. Method: We examined patent data and drug discovery and development histories to assess the extent of public support for late-stage medication development for all new drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) containing one or more new molecular entity approved between January 2008 and December 2017 via the new drug application pathway.
    [Show full text]
  • Rasmussen Foss
    Business Model Innovation in the Pharmaceutical Industry The Supporting Role of Organizational Design Ahrensbach Rasmussen, Klement; Foss, Nicolai J. Document Version Final published version Publication date: 2014 License CC BY-NC-ND Citation for published version (APA): Ahrensbach Rasmussen, K., & Foss, N. J. (2014). Business Model Innovation in the Pharmaceutical Industry: The Supporting Role of Organizational Design. Institut for Strategic Management and Globalization. SMG Working Paper No. 4 Link to publication in CBS Research Portal General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us ([email protected]) providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 02. Oct. 2021 BUSINESS MODEL INNOVATION IN THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY: THE SUPPORTING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL DESIGN Klement Ahrensbach Rasmussen Nicolai J. Foss SMG WP 3/2014 February, 2014 978-87-91815-12-6 SMG Working Paper No. 4/2014 February, 2014 ISBN: 978-87-91815-96-6 978-87-91815-23-2 978-87-91815-24-9 978-87-91815-24-9 978-87-91815-24-9 978-87-91815-24-9 978-87-91815-24-9 Department of Strategic Management and Globalization Copenhagen Business School Kilen, Kilevej 14A 2000 Frederiksberg Denmark www.cbs.dk/smg BUSINESS MODEL INNOVATION IN THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY: THE SUPPORTING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL DESIGN Klement Ahrensbach Rasmussen Department of Strategy and Globalization Copenhagen Business School Kilen; Kilevej 14, 2nd fl.
    [Show full text]
  • RSAP1359 Proof 41..55
    MEDICINES AUTHORITY REGULATOR AND INDUSTRY PERCEPTIONS OF BIOSIMILAR INTERCHANGEABILITY Druedahl, Louise C.; De Bruin, Marie L.; Hoogland, Hans; Minssen, Timo; van de Weert, Marco; Sporrong, Sofia Kalvemark; Almarsdottir, Anna Birna DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.09.006 Publication date: 2019 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Document license: CC BY Citation for published version (APA): Druedahl, L. C., De Bruin, M. L., Hoogland, H., Minssen, T., van de Weert, M., Sporrong, S. K., & Almarsdottir, A. B. (2019). MEDICINES AUTHORITY REGULATOR AND INDUSTRY PERCEPTIONS OF BIOSIMILAR INTERCHANGEABILITY. E45-E46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.09.006 Download date: 27. Sep. 2021 Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy 15 (2019) e41ee55 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy journal homepage: www.rsap.org 9th Nordic Social Pharmacy Conference 2019. Conference abstracts ATTITUDES TOWARDS DEPRESCRIBING IN OLDER ADULTS WITH Pottegård a,c. a Hospital Pharmacy Funen, Odense University Hospital, LIMITED LIFE EXPECTANCY: TWO SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS Odense, Denmark; b OPEN, Odense Patient data Explorative Network, Odense, Denmark; c Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Department of Alaa Burghle a,b, Carina Lundby a,b, Jesper Ryg c,d, Jens Søndergaard e, Anton Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Pottegård a,b, Trine Graabæk a,b, Dorthe Nielsen f,g,h. a Hospital Pharmacy d Research and Development, Danish College of Pharmacy Practice, Hillerød, Funen, Odense University Hospital, Odense C, Denmark; b Clinical Denmark; e Social and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Copenhagen Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Department of Public Health, University of University, Copenhagen, Denmark Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark; c Department of Geriatric E-mail address: [email protected] (A.
    [Show full text]
  • Den 4. Industrielle Revolution Robotterne Kommer, Lyder Det Stadig Oftere
    Fagforeningen for lægemiddel- akademikere Pas på med reklame på dine sociale medier – side 4 Ny serie: Leo Innovation Lab går beyond the pill – side 20 Den 4. industrielle Danmark risikerer at stå revolution uden vigtigt medico- 1 · 2018 1 · organ – side 26 Side 6 Leder 2018 på ydre og indre linjer i tager nu hul på det tredje år med implementering af vores 2020-stra- tegi, hvor vi både arbejder eksternt med at øge fagforeningens gen- nemslagskraft og internt med at udvikle Pharmadanmark – de to ting Aldrig hørerV i allerhøjeste grad sammen. Ser vi i krystalkuglen for Pharmadanmarks eksterne fokusområder, kom- før har mer vi helt sikkert til at byde ind med vores syn på, hvordan mulighederne i Pharma- personlig medicin og sundhedsdata udnyttes. Antibiotikaresistens vil også danmark i være en stadig vigtigere dagsorden. Her skal vi forsøge at trænge igennem med budskabet om, at der er brug for incitamenter til lægemiddelindustrien løbet af så om at investere i udvikling af nye, virksomme antibiotika. Selvfølgelig skal vi kort tid mødt også slå på tromme for, at farmaceuter på apotek og hospital har en vigtig så mange rolle at spille i bekæmpelsen af resistens. Det nære sammenhængende sundhedsvæsen, altså sundhedsarbejde i medlemmer. regioner og kommuner, vil vi også beskæftige os med. Særligt med hvordan Rikke Løvig Simonsen Formand ældre medicinbrugere kan få mere sikkerhed og kvalitet i behandlingen. Vi har allerede gode folk ansat i flere kommuner, men de lægemiddelfaglige kompetencer skal bruges mere. Vi vil stadig have øje for, at dansk life science-industri har gode vilkår – naturligvis ikke mindst højtuddannet arbejdskraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2020 Smart Choices for Everyday Healthcare
    Smart choices for everyday healthcare Annual Report 2020 Annual Report 2020 Table of Contents 32 Becoming a faster Management and smarter digital Financial review business statements 34 Share and shareholders 06 Karo Pharma at a glance 38 Statutory administration “Despite COVID-19, report 07 Our strategy we’ve continued to 49 Five-year summary 08 Our commitments develop our business at a fast pace.” 52 Corporate governance 10 Letter from the CEO: report Making good on our – Christoffer Lorenzen, purpose CEO, Karo Pharma 56 Board 12 Letter from the Chairman: 58 Management A business well set for success 60 Financial Statements 14 Highlights 2020 68 Notes 16 Connecting with 94 Signatures consumers: The key to competitiveness 95 Audit report 21 Anticipating a 99 Definitions of key indicators post —COVID market 100 Product Information 24 Focusing on what matters most 101 Annual general meeting 28 Tackling conditions and defeating stigma 30 Connectivity: The key to a strong com munity and an even stronger business 3 Karo Pharma Annual Report 2020 Management review 4 Management review 5 Management review Fast Our vision is to become a pan-European Our strategy is to help shape the Approx. facts leader in everyday healthcare future within everyday healthcare and 200 respond intelligently to changes in employees in 10 countries. Headquar- Products sold in the environment around us. tered in Stockholm, Sweden 60+ Karo Pharma To guide our actions, we have made important strategic choices regarding markets We are an equal ‘where to play’ and ‘how to win’. opportunities employer. at a glance Women represent 80+ Where to play 50% of Executive Manage- brands across ment and 50% of our six different Purpose Smart choices for everyday healthcare people managers are categories women.
    [Show full text]
  • Novo Nordisk A/S
    Novo Nordisk A/S P Annual Report 2008 Financial, social and environmental performance h 2 Our focus is our strength F S D O B G G S R R A O O N E C F L O O O O R C N E W R C E E E N S D C M * * S Performance highlights 2008 2008 2007 Change Financial performance Sales total DKK million 45,553 41,831 9% Diabetes care DKK million 33,356 30,478 9% Of which modern insulins DKK million 17,317 14,008 24% Biopharmaceuticals DKK million 12,197 11,353 7% Gross profi t DKK million 35,444 32,038 11% Gross margin % 77.8 76.6 Sales and distribution costs % of sales 28.2 29.6 Research and development costs % of sales 17.2 20.4 Research and development costs excl AERx® *) % of sales 16.5 17.2 Administration expenses % of sales 5.8 6.0 Operating profi t DKK million 12,373 8,942 38% Operating profi t excl AERx® *) DKK million 12,698 10,267 24% Net profi t DKK million 9,645 8,522 13% Effective tax rate % 24.0 22.3 Capital expenditure DKK million 1,754 2,268 (23%) Free cash fl ow DKK million 11,015 9,012 22% Long-term fi nancial targets Operating profi t growth % 38.4 (1.9) Operating profi t growth excl AERx® *) % 23.7 12.6 Operating margin % 27.2 21.4 Operating margin excl AERx® *) % 27.9 24.5 Return on invested capital (ROIC) % 37.4 27.2 Cash to earnings (three-year average) % 97.6 87.0 Non-fi nancial performance Employment impact worldwide Number of jobs 88,500 81,600 8% Water consumption 1,000 m3 2,684 3,231 (17%) Recycling percentage (waste) % 51 38 CO2 emissions 1,000 tons 215 236 (9%) Employees FTE 26,575 25,516 4% Employee turnover rate % 12.1 11.6 Engaging culture (employee engagement) Scale 1–5 4.2 4.1 New patent families (fi rst fi ling) Number 71 116 (39%) Share performance Dividend per share (proposed) DKK 6.00 4.50 33% Closing share price (B shares) DKK 271 335 (19%) Market capitalisation (B shares) **) DKK billion 135 172 (22%) **) Excluding non-recurring costs related to discontinuation of all pulmonary diabetes projects.
    [Show full text]