NYSE P 2014.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

NYSE P 2014.Pdf To Our Stockholders As I approach my two year anniversary as Pandora’s Chief Executive Officer, I wake up every day thinking how fortunate I am to be at Pandora. Our organization is stronger than ever and driving a powerful vision for the future of music and radio. Our long term vision to be the effortless source of music for billions guides our effort to make the future of music highly personalized to each listener’s tastes, provide exposure to the broadest possible number of artists and genres, and offer a targeted and efficient platform for advertisers. We made significant progress towards making this vision a reality in 2014. Pandora continued to deliver strong financial and operational growth while establishing new initiatives reflecting our unique leadership position in the music industry. At the end of calendar year 2014, listener hours grew to 20.03 billion from 16.70 billion in 2013, and active users for the 30-day period ended December 31, 2014 increased to 81.5 million. Non-GAAP total revenue for the 12 months ended December 31, 2014 reached $906.6 million, an increase of 40% from the prior year; revenue growth continued to be driven by mobile, where we grew total Non-GAAP mobile ad revenue 52% to $699.1 million. Monetization from advertising on mobile and other connected devices reached another record high RPM (revenue per thousand hours) in Q4 of $44.37 for the second year in a row, an increase of 18.8% from the same period last year. As one of the few media companies operating at scale across multiple platforms, we have an enormous market opportunity before us and multiple opportunities for growth. Pandora is uniquely positioned to capture growth from both the $20 billion plus US digital advertising market and the $15 billion plus US radio business as we continue to gain market share and expand meaningfully into local advertising markets once dominated by terrestrial radio. In fact, by the end of 2014, we had grown local advertising 124% to $152.9 million year-over-year. During the same time, according to our estimates, which include third party data, Pandora’s share of all U.S. radio listening was 9.7%, up from 8.6% a year earlier. For our listeners, we deliver a highly personalized experience driven by our proprietary Music Genome Project. In 2014, tens of millions of listeners actively engaged with Pandora, and we now have over 7 billion stations launched and 50 billion pieces of thumb feedback. Thumb feedback helps us further hone our playlist technology and provides insights we can leverage to continue delivering music people love. We also introduced a refreshed user interface and features like recommended stations, which increased thumb feedback by 19% and station creation by 20%. For our advertising partners, we are transforming how marketers engage their customers and delivering true return on investment. With 37 local offices and over 110 local salespeople, we are well-positioned to expand our share of the $15 billion plus US radio business . In terms of digital revenue opportunities, we are positioning Pandora to lead the transition in what we see as an inevitable shift to mobile programmatic buying. People will increasingly use their mobile devices for e-commerce, and advertisers are sure to follow – looking for high- engagement properties on mobile. As comScore data shows, Pandora is number one in the United States with regards to time spent per visitor on mobile, and with this top position, accurate targeting, and brand-safe environment, we are well-positioned to capitalize on this shift. For music makers, we accelerated our ongoing efforts to be an indispensable partner. In addition to being the highest paying form of radio to artists and writers – and growing – Pandora also has proven promotional impact – helping generate additional revenue for artists off of our platform. In 2014, we signed direct deals with Merlin and BMG, and more recently in 2015 with Naxos. We continued to further connect our 80 million plus listeners with their favorite artists, and vice versa. The launch of the Artist Marketing Platform (AMP) provided music makers with unprecedented data and information to strengthen their connections with fans. But this is just the beginning. In 2015, we will invest heavily in the development of additional initiatives, and you will see us working collaboratively with the industry to build and strengthen partnerships of mutual benefit. We believe our future will include more direct licensing arrangements with an expanded group of copyright holders and we will continue to pursue win-win licensing arrangements with labels and publishers. The majority of the royalties we pay to license music in the United States are based on rates set by the Copyright Royalty Board, or the CRB, and their ruling determining the rates for the next five years – 2016 through 2020 - will come near the end of 2015. While there may be some inherent investor uncertainty about Pandora until that time, we are very confident our position is well represented in the CRB proceeding and that it will result in a reasonable outcome. I see the year ahead as a critical inflection point where we are investing strategically in order to extend our leadership position for years to come. 2015 is not a year of caution. It is a year of conviction. In the coming year, you will see Pandora move decisively and assertively to capture the enormous market opportunity before us. We have already assembled the best combination of people, technology and content in our industry, and we’re entering 2015 from a position of strength. We will not be distracted from our mission to unleash the infinite power of music, and we will be laser-focused on advancing our key strategies. I believe we are extremely well-positioned to succeed on all of these fronts. This company has proven to be incredibly resilient in its history, and I am confident that no matter what challenges we might encounter, we will overcome them. We know we can, because we have what it takes: scale, data, technology, relationships, and people with talent and passion like no one else. Sincerely, Brian McAndrews Chairman, CEO & President Pandora Media Inc. UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 or TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File Number: 001-35198 Pandora Media, Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 94-3352630 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 2101 Webster Street, Suite 1650 Oakland, CA 94612 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) (510) 451-4100 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act: Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered Common stock, $0.0001 par value The New York Stock Exchange Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes No Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes No Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (Section 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one): Large accelerated filer Accelerated filer Non-accelerated filer Smaller reporting company (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes No The aggregate market value of the voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2014 (the last business day of the registrant's most recently completed second quarter), based on the closing price of such stock on The New York Stock Exchange on such date was approximately $4,656 million. This calculation excludes the shares of common stock held by executive officers, directors and stockholders whose ownership exceeds 5% outstanding at June 30, 2014. This calculation does not reflect a determination that such persons are affiliates for any other purposes.
Recommended publications
  • Understanding the Value of Arts & Culture | the AHRC Cultural Value
    Understanding the value of arts & culture The AHRC Cultural Value Project Geoffrey Crossick & Patrycja Kaszynska 2 Understanding the value of arts & culture The AHRC Cultural Value Project Geoffrey Crossick & Patrycja Kaszynska THE AHRC CULTURAL VALUE PROJECT CONTENTS Foreword 3 4. The engaged citizen: civic agency 58 & civic engagement Executive summary 6 Preconditions for political engagement 59 Civic space and civic engagement: three case studies 61 Part 1 Introduction Creative challenge: cultural industries, digging 63 and climate change 1. Rethinking the terms of the cultural 12 Culture, conflict and post-conflict: 66 value debate a double-edged sword? The Cultural Value Project 12 Culture and art: a brief intellectual history 14 5. Communities, Regeneration and Space 71 Cultural policy and the many lives of cultural value 16 Place, identity and public art 71 Beyond dichotomies: the view from 19 Urban regeneration 74 Cultural Value Project awards Creative places, creative quarters 77 Prioritising experience and methodological diversity 21 Community arts 81 Coda: arts, culture and rural communities 83 2. Cross-cutting themes 25 Modes of cultural engagement 25 6. Economy: impact, innovation and ecology 86 Arts and culture in an unequal society 29 The economic benefits of what? 87 Digital transformations 34 Ways of counting 89 Wellbeing and capabilities 37 Agglomeration and attractiveness 91 The innovation economy 92 Part 2 Components of Cultural Value Ecologies of culture 95 3. The reflective individual 42 7. Health, ageing and wellbeing 100 Cultural engagement and the self 43 Therapeutic, clinical and environmental 101 Case study: arts, culture and the criminal 47 interventions justice system Community-based arts and health 104 Cultural engagement and the other 49 Longer-term health benefits and subjective 106 Case study: professional and informal carers 51 wellbeing Culture and international influence 54 Ageing and dementia 108 Two cultures? 110 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Pays Soundexchange: Q1 - Q3 2017
    Payments received through 09/30/2017 Who Pays SoundExchange: Q1 - Q3 2017 Entity Name License Type ACTIVAIRE.COM BES AMBIANCERADIO.COM BES AURA MULTIMEDIA CORPORATION BES CLOUDCOVERMUSIC.COM BES COROHEALTH.COM BES CUSTOMCHANNELS.NET (BES) BES DMX MUSIC BES ELEVATEDMUSICSERVICES.COM BES GRAYV.COM BES INSTOREAUDIONETWORK.COM BES IT'S NEVER 2 LATE BES JUKEBOXY BES MANAGEDMEDIA.COM BES MEDIATRENDS.BIZ BES MIXHITS.COM BES MTI Digital Inc - MTIDIGITAL.BIZ BES MUSIC CHOICE BES MUSIC MAESTRO BES MUZAK.COM BES PRIVATE LABEL RADIO BES RFC MEDIA - BES BES RISE RADIO BES ROCKBOT, INC. BES SIRIUS XM RADIO, INC BES SOUND-MACHINE.COM BES STARTLE INTERNATIONAL INC. BES Stingray Business BES Stingray Music USA BES STORESTREAMS.COM BES STUDIOSTREAM.COM BES TARGET MEDIA CENTRAL INC BES Thales InFlyt Experience BES UMIXMEDIA.COM BES SIRIUS XM RADIO, INC CABSAT Stingray Music USA CABSAT MUSIC CHOICE PES MUZAK.COM PES SIRIUS XM RADIO, INC SDARS 181.FM Webcasting 3ABNRADIO (Christian Music) Webcasting 3ABNRADIO (Religious) Webcasting 8TRACKS.COM Webcasting 903 NETWORK RADIO Webcasting A-1 COMMUNICATIONS Webcasting ABERCROMBIE.COM Webcasting ABUNDANT RADIO Webcasting ACAVILLE.COM Webcasting *SoundExchange accepts and distributes payments without confirming eligibility or compliance under Sections 112 or 114 of the Copyright Act, and it does not waive the rights of artists or copyright owners that receive such payments. Payments received through 09/30/2017 ACCURADIO.COM Webcasting ACRN.COM Webcasting AD ASTRA RADIO Webcasting ADAMS RADIO GROUP Webcasting ADDICTEDTORADIO.COM Webcasting ADORATION Webcasting AGM BAKERSFIELD Webcasting AGM CALIFORNIA - SAN LUIS OBISPO Webcasting AGM NEVADA, LLC Webcasting AGM SANTA MARIA, L.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Management Can New Players Still Compete with the Giants?
    Master Thesis Business Administration – Strategic Management Can new players still compete with the giants? Analyzing the creation of new platforms and how their strategies change overtime in the music platform industry Author: Maikel Coeleman Student number: S4357736 Supervisor: Dr. S. Khanagha Second examiner: Dr. G.W. Ziggers Date: 25-8-2018 1 Table of contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Problem Statement ....................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Relevance ...................................................................................................................................... 8 1.3 Outline Thesis ................................................................................................................................ 9 2. Theoretical background ..................................................................................................................... 10 2.1 How to deal with the dilemmas of platform creation ................................................................. 10 2.2 Roger’s diffusion of innovations .................................................................................................. 10 2.3 First-, second- & late-movers ...................................................................................................... 17 3. Methodology ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Internet Based Distribution and Visualization of a 3D Model of the University of Cologne Campus
    3rd ISDE DIGITAL EARTH SUMMIT 12-14 June, 2010, Nessebar, Bulgaria INTERNET BASED DISTRIBUTION AND VISUALIZATION OF A 3D MODEL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE CAMPUS Willmes, C.*, Baaser, U., Volland, K. and G. Bareth Institute of Geography (GIS & RS), University of Cologne Albertus-Magnus-Platz, 50923 Cologne, Germany *corresponding author; Phone: +49-(0)221-470-6234, [email protected] Abstract Visualization of 3D geodata integrated into a web browser based user interface is still a key issue in geoinformation science research. In a short overview of state of the art solutions for this demand, the key advantages and disadvantages of each of those solutions are lined out. As a solution which combines most of the advantages identified before, a CityGML based 3D model of the University of Cologne Campus and the setup of an OGC conform Web Perspective View Service for internet based visualization of this model is described. Keywords 3D geodata visualization, 3D model, 3D buildings, CityGML, 3D-SDI, WPVS. 0. INTRODUCTION In this paper an implementation of a CityGML (Kolbe et. al 2008) based 3D model of the University of Cologne Campus buildings and the setup of an OGC Web Perspective View Service (WPVS) based visualization of this model is presented. The considerations to choose the WPVS technique for the system setup and the implementation of this web service will be described in the following of this paper. Study area for this project is the University of Cologne Campus area for which a GIS is available, the CampusGIS (CampusGIS 2010). The CampusGIS provides general and spatial campus information, e.
    [Show full text]
  • Insideradio.Com
    800.275.2840 MORE NEWS» insideradio.com THE MOST TRUSTED NEWS IN RADIO WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 7, 2015 Radio 2015: Big ideas on the Washington agenda. It will be the year of copyrights, predicts one radio industry lobbyist, as a new Republican-controlled Congress takes over and big issues dominate the agenda. Inside-the-Beltway players say the issue for 2015 will be how far lawmakers can get with their lofty goals, a list that includes many potential pitfalls for radio. While radio royalties may win the prize for best staying power across multiple sessions, radio’s biggest challenge in the 114th Congress may have nothing to do with music. “The fallout from the election strongly suggests that tax reform is one of the first things that are going to be on the table,” says Dan Jaffe, head of the Association of National Advertisers’ government relations office in Washington. It’s one of the few areas where there seems to be agreement between the White House and Capitol Hill, with an interest in, at the very Radio 2015: All this least, stretching out the timeline for marketers looking to deduct their advertising expense. Tax reform week Inside Radio will examine the also polls well with voters. “It’s the biggest threat to the ad deduction ever,” Jaffe warns. A coalition biggest issues facing of groups is working the backrooms of Congress, trying to maintain the status quo. But with an issue broadcasters, along that crosses partisan lines, no one is ready to predict which way a tax reform bill could come together.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction How Do You Turn Your Passion for App Development Into a Serious Business? the App Developer Business Kit by Admob Is Here to Help
    Introduction How do you turn your passion for app development into a serious business? The App Developer Business Kit by AdMob is here to help. You’ve got a brilliant idea for an app that strikes when you least expect it! Fast forward two months and your app is built, it works and all your friends have tested it (but you’ve told only a handful of work colleagues about it). You release it but you’re not quite sure what to do next. The Business Kit is a guide for entrepreneurial developers to turn their app into a successful business. It has four sections packed with tips and advice from developers and industry leaders. From an idea to an app Understand the principles for success, and hear advice from some of the world’s top app developers. Growth Attract more users, expand into more markets and use analytics to improve your app. Think big How to go from one great app to a portfolio of great apps and important considerations for expanding your business. Nine takeaways Nine tips to help you become a more successful developer. Why apps, why now? Annual global revenue for apps reached $27BN in 2013[1], and is forecast to climb to $75BN by 2017[2], with sophisticated developers opting for freemium revenue models rather than paid. What’s driving this enor- mous growth? Three important trends: The appetite for smartphones is immense. Sales of smartphones surpassed sales of feature phones tration exceeds 50%.[4] People are spending more time on mobile devices. Mobile is becoming the most popular way to get online, exceeding time spent using desktop computers.[5] Users love apps.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol. 80 Thursday, No. 185 September 24, 2015
    Vol. 80 Thursday, No. 185 September 24, 2015 Pages 57509–57692 OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL REGISTER VerDate Sep 11 2014 19:01 Sep 23, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4710 Sfmt 4710 E:\FR\FM\24SEWS.LOC 24SEWS tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with WS II Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 185 / Thursday, September 24, 2015 The FEDERAL REGISTER (ISSN 0097–6326) is published daily, SUBSCRIPTIONS AND COPIES Monday through Friday, except official holidays, by the Office PUBLIC of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration, Washington, DC 20408, under the Federal Register Subscriptions: Act (44 U.S.C. Ch. 15) and the regulations of the Administrative Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 Committee of the Federal Register (1 CFR Ch. I). The Assistance with public subscriptions 202–512–1806 Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20402 is the exclusive distributor of the official General online information 202–512–1530; 1–888–293–6498 edition. Periodicals postage is paid at Washington, DC. Single copies/back copies: The FEDERAL REGISTER provides a uniform system for making Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 available to the public regulations and legal notices issued by Assistance with public single copies 1–866–512–1800 Federal agencies. These include Presidential proclamations and (Toll-Free) Executive Orders, Federal agency documents having general FEDERAL AGENCIES applicability and legal effect, documents required to be published Subscriptions: by act of Congress, and other Federal agency documents of public interest. Assistance with Federal agency subscriptions: Documents are on file for public inspection in the Office of the Email [email protected] Federal Register the day before they are published, unless the Phone 202–741–6000 issuing agency requests earlier filing.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Automatic 3D Reconstruction of Pitched Roofs in Monocular Satellite/Aerial Images
    TOWARDS AUTOMATIC 3D RECONSTRUCTION OF PITCHED ROOFS IN MONOCULAR SATELLITE/AERIAL IMAGES by Zachary Blair B.A.Sc., Simon Fraser University, 2008 a Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Applied Science in the School of Engineering Science Faculty of Applied Sciences c Zachary Blair 2012 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Fall 2012 All rights reserved. However, in accordance with the Copyright Act of Canada, this work may be reproduced without authorization under the conditions for \Fair Dealing." Therefore, limited reproduction of this work for the purposes of private study, research, criticism, review and news reporting is likely to be in accordance with the law, particularly if cited appropriately. APPROVAL Name: Zachary Blair Degree: Master of Applied Science Title of Thesis: Towards Automatic 3D Reconstruction of Pitched Roofs in Monocular Satellite/Aerial Images Examining Committee: Dr. Ljiljana Trajkovic Chair Dr. Parvaneh Saeedi, Senior Supervisor Dr. Shahram Payandeh, Supervisor Dr. Ivan Bajic, Internal Examiner Date Approved: October 22, 2012 ii Partial Copyright Licence Abstract This thesis presents a novel method for estimating the three-dimensional shape of pitched roofs in monocular satellite/aerial images by utilizing the acquisition geometry (both sun and camera). This method consists of four steps: rooftop extraction, texture and vent removal, identification of planar sections, and 3D roof model generation. During the fourth step, 3D reconstruction candidates are partially rendered and iteratively compared against the original image to evaluate a fitness function. The experimental results illustrate that the proposed framework can derive 3D building rooftop models, including estimates for roof pitch, from single satellite/aerial images in situations where previous techniques fail.
    [Show full text]
  • Utilização De Ferramentas E Serviços Google Para O Desenvolvimento De Projetos De Engenharia, Arquitetura E Urbanismo
    UTILIZAÇÃO DE FERRAMENTAS E SERVIÇOS GOOGLE PARA O DESENVOLVIMENTO DE PROJETOS DE ENGENHARIA, ARQUITETURA E URBANISMO 1. Introdução A empresa Google Inc. nasceu em 1998, quando Larry Page e Sergey Brin, dois estudantes da Stanford University, resolveram criar um sistema de busca de hipertextos na internet. A palavra “Google” é uma brincadeira com a palavra “googol”, o termo matemático para 1 seguido de 100 zeros, que se encaixa muito bem no objetivo de construir um sistema de busca de larga escala (BRIN; PAGE, 1998). O Google desenvolveu e disponibiliza, muitas vezes de forma gratuita, diversas ferramentas e serviços, tais como: Google Web Search, Google Translator, Google Mail (Gmail), Google Maps, Google StreetView, Google Earth, Google SketchUp, Google Building Maker, Google Image Search, Google Play, Google Drive, Google Chrome, YouTube, Orkut, Picasa, entre outros. A lista completa pode ser encontrada em Google Inc. (2013a). Segundo a empresa, a missão do Google é organizar a informação mundial e fazê-la universalmente acessível e útil (GOOGLE INC., 2013b). Muitas destas ferramentas oferecidas pelo Google podem ser utilizadas para o desenvolvimento de projetos preliminares e estudo de viabilidade em áreas como Engenharia, Arquitetura e Urbanismo. O geoprocessamento no Google começou em 2004, quando o mesmo adquiriu a empresa de mapeamento digital Keyhole e lançou o Google Maps e o Google Earth em 2005. Com o passar do tempo, o Google Maps evoluiu muito e hoje permite a visualização de trânsito em tempo real, a geração de rotas a partir de pontos de origem e destino e a visualização imagens ao nível da rua (StreetView).
    [Show full text]
  • In Re Pandora Media, Inc., 6 F. Supp. 3D 317 (S.D.N.Y. 2014)
    IN RE PANDORA MEDIA, INC. 317 Cite as 6 F.Supp.3d 317 (S.D.N.Y. 2014) 225 F.Supp.2d 190, 213 (N.D.N.Y.2002) sonable fees and terms for through-to-the- (‘‘In order to hold an individual liable un- audience (TTTA) blanket license to per- der [the aiding and abetting provision], TTT form musical compositions in repertoire of plaintiff must also show that the individual performing-rights organization (PRO), aided or abetted a primary violation of the pursuant to consent decree. The court pro- [NYS]HRL committed by another employ- hibited PRO from withdrawing rights from ee or the business itself.’’ (alterations in petitioner to perform any compositions original) (internal quotation marks omit- over which PRO retained any licensing ted)). Because plaintiff’s underlying retal- rights, 2013 WL 5211927. iation claim under NYSHRL has been dis- missed or otherwise abandoned, any claim Holdings: After conducting a bench trial, she seeks to assert against Heifferon as an the District Court, Denise Cote, J., held aider and abettor of such alleged retaliato- that: ry conduct fails as a matter of law. (1) TTTA blanket license rate of 1.85% of Plaintiff’s claims under NYSHRL revenue was reasonable for every year against Heifferon in her individual capacity of license term and are dismissed. (2) service was not entitled to rate of IV. CONCLUSION 1.70% of revenue. For all of the foregoing reasons, Defen- Ordered accordingly. dants’ motion for summary judgment dis- missing the Amended Complaint in its en- tirety is granted. 1. Copyrights and Intellectual Property IT IS SO ORDERED.
    [Show full text]
  • Google Earth Studio GSA Short Course
    Google Earth Studio GSA short course Google Confidential and Proprietary 1 Agenda • Introduction • Special stories • Google Earth Studio - What is it? - Timeline editor - Publish the created content easily - Artwork creation - Animation creation - Other assets - User settings - Styles - Workgroups • Tips & tricks • Questions Google Confidential and Proprietary Special links - stories Many discoveries were done with Google Earth This week: 1 billions download was celebrated with this: http://www.oneworldmanystories.com/index.html One story I was a bit involved with: Found in South Africa: Key Link in Human Evolution? a 2 million year old hominid Google Confidential and Proprietary Introduction We are constantly improving our tools according to your feedback! Please help us to by letting us know what good or bad things you find! All feedback is good! We like the good but want to hear the bad as well! Google Confidential and Proprietary Google Earth Studio Google Earth Studio addresses the following aspects (to name a few): • An 'end to end solution' for Google Earth presentations • Collaborative editing (you can manage your own workgroup of students) • Quick creation of great content, going beyond Google Earth's capabilities and eliminating the need for external tools (like ‘Photoshop’, video post processing, ...) • A timeline editor like 'Final Cut Pro' for Earth content • Creation of high quality geo related animations • Data storage in the cloud - accessible only by workgroup members • Tool state gets saved into the cloud – you can work
    [Show full text]
  • Get the Facts: Pandora Buys Fm Radio Station in A
    GET THE FACTS: PANDORA BUYS FM RADIO STATION IN A BID TO UNDERCUT SONGWRITERS Pandora recently purchased radio station KXMZ-FM in Rapid City, South Dakota, in a bid to lower the licensing fees it pays songwriters and composers for public performances of their work. Pandora says this will help music creators and listeners, but the facts tell a much different story. SONGWRITERS DRIVE HUGE REVENUES FOR PANDORA • Pandora, a Wall Street-traded company, reported revenues of more than $920 million in FY2014 alone.1 • In contrast, ASCAP is a membership organization that operates on a not-for-profit basis to collect and distribute royalties to the more than 525,000 independent songwriters, composers and music publishers it represents.2 • Every 1,000 plays of a song on Pandora is worth about 9 cents in performance rights for its songwriters, composers and publishers ($0.00009 per stream). 3 • To put that in context, Miranda Lambert’s hit song “The House that Built Me” was streamed on Pandora nearly 22 million times, earning its songwriters and publishers roughly $1,788.48. Co-writer Allen Shamblin received only $894.14. Lady Antebellum’s 2011 Grammy-winning Song of the Year “Need You Now” was streamed nearly 72 million times on Pandora, earning its four songwriters and publishers $5,918.28. Co-writer Josh Kear received only $1,479.57. 4 • In 2014, Pandora paid all songwriters only about $36 million in total royalties, representing a mere 4% of the company’s revenue.5 PANDORA USES MORE MUSIC THAN TRADITIONAL RADIO • Internet radio and traditional AM/FM radio use music and generate revenue in very different ways.
    [Show full text]