DOCSLIB.ORG

Stickelberger and the Eigenvalue Theorem IPM MATHEMATICS COLLOQUIUM

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Stickelberger and the Eigenvalue Theorem IPM MATHEMATICS COLLOQUIUM Stickelberger and the Eigenvalue Theorem IPM MATHEMATICS COLLOQUIUM David A. Cox Amherst College Department of Mathematics & Statistics April 14, 2021 David A. Cox (Amherst College) Stickelberger & Eigenvalues April14,2021 1/18 The Eigenvalue Theorem Let F be algebraically closed and I F[x1,..., xn] be an ideal with n ⊂ V(I) F is finite (so I is zero dimensional). For h F[x ,..., xn], ⊆ ∈ 1 multiplication by h induces a linear map m : F[x ,..., xn]/I F[x ,..., xn]/I. h 1 −→ 1 The Eigenvalue Theorem The eigenvalues of m are h(a) for a V(I). h ∈ I love this theorem because it reveals a wonderful link between polynomial algebra and linear algebra. To actually find solutions, note: The eigenvalues of mxi are the ith coordinates of the solutions. Since mxi mxj = mxi xj = mxj xi = mxj mxi , simultaneous eigenvectors exist. They give the solutions! Recent work of Simon Telen explores how the Eigenvalue Theorem interacts with numerical algebraic geometry. In this lecture, I will instead focus on a name attached to the theorem. David A. Cox (Amherst College) Stickelberger & Eigenvalues April14,2021 2/18 The Eigenvalue Theorem Let F be algebraically closed and I F[x1,..., xn] be an ideal with n ⊂ V(I) F is finite (so I is zero dimensional). For h F[x ,..., xn], ⊆ ∈ 1 multiplication by h induces a linear map m : F[x ,..., xn]/I F[x ,..., xn]/I. h 1 −→ 1 The Eigenvalue Theorem The eigenvalues of m are h(a) for a V(I). h ∈ I love this theorem because it reveals a wonderful link between polynomial algebra and linear algebra. To actually find solutions, note: The eigenvalues of mxi are the ith coordinates of the solutions. Since mxi mxj = mxi xj = mxj xi = mxj mxi , simultaneous eigenvectors exist. They give the solutions! Recent work of Simon Telen explores how the Eigenvalue Theorem interacts with numerical algebraic geometry. In this lecture, I will instead focus on a name attached to the theorem. David A. Cox (Amherst College) Stickelberger & Eigenvalues April14,2021 2/18 The Eigenvalue Theorem Let F be algebraically closed and I F[x1,..., xn] be an ideal with n ⊂ V(I) F is finite (so I is zero dimensional). For h F[x ,..., xn], ⊆ ∈ 1 multiplication by h induces a linear map m : F[x ,..., xn]/I F[x ,..., xn]/I. h 1 −→ 1 The Eigenvalue Theorem The eigenvalues of m are h(a) for a V(I). h ∈ I love this theorem because it reveals a wonderful link between polynomial algebra and linear algebra. To actually find solutions, note: The eigenvalues of mxi are the ith coordinates of the solutions. Since mxi mxj = mxi xj = mxj xi = mxj mxi , simultaneous eigenvectors exist. They give the solutions! Recent work of Simon Telen explores how the Eigenvalue Theorem interacts with numerical algebraic geometry. In this lecture, I will instead focus on a name attached to the theorem. David A. Cox (Amherst College) Stickelberger & Eigenvalues April14,2021 2/18 The Eigenvalue Theorem Let F be algebraically closed and I F[x1,..., xn] be an ideal with n ⊂ V(I) F is finite (so I is zero dimensional). For h F[x ,..., xn], ⊆ ∈ 1 multiplication by h induces a linear map m : F[x ,..., xn]/I F[x ,..., xn]/I. h 1 −→ 1 The Eigenvalue Theorem The eigenvalues of m are h(a) for a V(I). h ∈ I love this theorem because it reveals a wonderful link between polynomial algebra and linear algebra. To actually find solutions, note: The eigenvalues of mxi are the ith coordinates of the solutions. Since mxi mxj = mxi xj = mxj xi = mxj mxi , simultaneous eigenvectors exist. They give the solutions! Recent work of Simon Telen explores how the Eigenvalue Theorem interacts with numerical algebraic geometry. In this lecture, I will instead focus on a name attached to the theorem. David A. Cox (Amherst College) Stickelberger & Eigenvalues April14,2021 2/18 The Eigenvalue Theorem Let F be algebraically closed and I F[x1,..., xn] be an ideal with n ⊂ V(I) F is finite (so I is zero dimensional). For h F[x ,..., xn], ⊆ ∈ 1 multiplication by h induces a linear map m : F[x ,..., xn]/I F[x ,..., xn]/I. h 1 −→ 1 The Eigenvalue Theorem The eigenvalues of m are h(a) for a V(I). h ∈ I love this theorem because it reveals a wonderful link between polynomial algebra and linear algebra. To actually find solutions, note: The eigenvalues of mxi are the ith coordinates of the solutions. Since mxi mxj = mxi xj = mxj xi = mxj mxi , simultaneous eigenvectors exist. They give the solutions! Recent work of Simon Telen explores how the Eigenvalue Theorem interacts with numerical algebraic geometry. In this lecture, I will instead focus on a name attached to the theorem. David A. Cox (Amherst College) Stickelberger & Eigenvalues April14,2021 2/18 Gonzalez-Vega and Trujillo, 1995 in Applied Algebra, Algebraic Algorithms and Error-Correcting Codes Theorem 1. (Stickelberger Theorem) Let K F be a field extension with F algebraically closed, h K[x] and ⊂ ∈ J bea zero dimensional ideal in K[x]. If F(J)= ∆ ,...,∆s are the V { 1 } zeros in Fn of J then there exists a basis of F[x]/J such that the matrix of Mh, with respect to this basis, has the following block structure: H1 0 . 0 h(∆i ) ⋆ ... ⋆ 0 H2 . 0 0 h(∆i ) ... ⋆ . where Hi = . . 0 0 . H 0 0 . h(∆ ) s i The dimension of the i-th submatrix is equal to the multiplicity of ∆i as a zero of the ideal J. Notation: M : F[x]/J F[x]/J is multiplication by h. h → David A. Cox (Amherst College) Stickelberger & Eigenvalues April14,2021 3/18 Sottile, 2002 in Computations in Algebraic Geometry with Macaulay2 Stickelberger’s Theorem Let h A and m be as above. Then there is a one-to-one ∈ h correspondence between eigenvectors vξ of mh and roots ξ of I, the eigenvalue of mh on vξ is the value h(ξ) of h at ξ, and the multiplicity of this eigenvalue (on the eigenvector vξ) is the multiplicity of the root ξ. Notation: A = k[X]/I, where I is a zero-dimensional ideal in k[X]. m : A A is multiplication by h A. h → ∈ David A. Cox (Amherst College) Stickelberger & Eigenvalues April14,2021 4/18 Basu, Pollack and Roy, 2006 Algorithms in Real Algebraic Geometry Theorem 4.99 (Stickelberger) For f A, the linear map L has the following properties: ∈ f The trace of Lf is Tr(Lf )= µ(x)f (x) Return ∈ P k x ZerX( ;C ) The determinant of Lf is µ(x) det(Lf )= f (x) Return ∈ P k x ZerY( ;C ) The characteristic polynomial χ( , f , T ) of L is P f χ( , f , T )= (T f (x))µ(x) P − ∈ k x ZerY(P;C ) Notation: A = C[X ,..., X ]/Ideal( , C), C algebraically closed. 1 k P David A. Cox (Amherst College) Stickelberger & Eigenvalues April14,2021 5/18 Goal of This Lecture The last three slides gave versions of a result called “Stickelberger’s Theorem”. The statement of the result was slightly different in each case. One feature they have in common: the authors never cite a specific paper of Stickelberger! Three Questions to Answer What did Stickelberger really do? How does it relate to “Stickelberger’s Theorem”? Why are his papers never cited? David A. Cox (Amherst College) Stickelberger & Eigenvalues April14,2021 6/18 Goal of This Lecture The last three slides gave versions of a result called “Stickelberger’s Theorem”. The statement of the result was slightly different in each case. One feature they have in common: the authors never cite a specific paper of Stickelberger! Three Questions to Answer What did Stickelberger really do? How does it relate to “Stickelberger’s Theorem”? Why are his papers never cited? David A. Cox (Amherst College) Stickelberger & Eigenvalues April14,2021 6/18 Goal of This Lecture The last three slides gave versions of a result called “Stickelberger’s Theorem”. The statement of the result was slightly different in each case. One feature they have in common: the authors never cite a specific paper of Stickelberger! Three Questions to Answer What did Stickelberger really do? How does it relate to “Stickelberger’s Theorem”? Why are his papers never cited? David A. Cox (Amherst College) Stickelberger & Eigenvalues April14,2021 6/18 Goal of This Lecture The last three slides gave versions of a result called “Stickelberger’s Theorem”. The statement of the result was slightly different in each case. One feature they have in common: the authors never cite a specific paper of Stickelberger! Three Questions to Answer What did Stickelberger really do? How does it relate to “Stickelberger’s Theorem”? Why are his papers never cited? David A. Cox (Amherst College) Stickelberger & Eigenvalues April14,2021 6/18 Goal of This Lecture The last three slides gave versions of a result called “Stickelberger’s Theorem”. The statement of the result was slightly different in each case. One feature they have in common: the authors never cite a specific paper of Stickelberger! Three Questions to Answer What did Stickelberger really do? How does it relate to “Stickelberger’s Theorem”? Why are his papers never cited? David A. Cox (Amherst College) Stickelberger & Eigenvalues April14,2021 6/18 Goal of This Lecture The last three slides gave versions of a result called “Stickelberger’s Theorem”. The statement of the result was slightly different in each case. One feature they have in common: the authors never cite a specific paper of Stickelberger! Three Questions to Answer What did Stickelberger really do? How does it relate to “Stickelberger’s Theorem”? Why are his papers never cited? David A.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ADJOINT DIVISORS and FREE DIVISORS Contents 1. Introduction
    ADJOINT DIVISORS AND FREE DIVISORS DAVID MOND AND MATHIAS SCHULZE Abstract. We describe two situations where adding the adjoint divisor to a divisor D with smooth normalization yields a free divisor. Both also involve stability or versality. In the first, D is the image of a corank 1 stable map-germ (Cn, 0) → (Cn+1, 0), and is not free. In the second, D is the discriminant of a versal deformation of a weighted homogeneous function with isolated critical point (subject to certain numerical conditions on the weights). Here D itself is already free. We also prove an elementary result, inspired by these first two, from which we obtain a plethora of new examples of free divisors. The presented results seem to scratch the surface of a more general phenomenon that is still to be revealed. Contents 1. Introduction 1 Notation 4 Acknowledgments 4 2. Images of stable maps 4 3. Discriminants of hypersurface singularities 12 4. Pull-back of free divisors 20 References 22 1. Introduction Let M be an n-dimensional complex analytic manifold and D a hypersurface in M. The OM -module Der( log D) of logarithmic vector fields along D consists of all vector fields on M tangent− to D at all smooth points of D. If this module is locally free, D is called a free divisor. This terminology was introduced by Kyoji Saito in [Sai80b]. As freeness is evidently a local condition, so we may pass to n germs of analytic spaces D X := (C , 0), pick coordinates x1,...,xn on X and a defining equation h O ⊂= C x ,...,x for D.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2007.12573V3 [Math.AC] 28 Aug 2020 1,Tm .] Egtamr Rcs Eso Fteegnau Theore Eigenvalue the of Version Precise 1.2 More a Theorem Get We 3.3], Thm
    STICKELBERGER AND THE EIGENVALUE THEOREM DAVID A. COX To David Eisenbud on the occasion of his 75th birthday. Abstract. This paper explores the relation between the Eigenvalue Theorem and the work of Ludwig Stickelberger (1850-1936). 1. Introduction The Eigenvalue Theorem is a standard result in computational algebraic geom- etry. Given a field F and polynomials f1,...,fs F [x1,...,xn], it is well known that the system ∈ (1.1) f = = fs =0 1 ··· has finitely many solutions over the algebraic closure F of F if and only if A = F [x ,...,xn]/ f ,...,fs 1 h 1 i has finite dimension over F (see, for example, Theorem 6 of [7, Ch. 5, 3]). § A polynomial f F [x ,...,xn] gives a multiplication map ∈ 1 mf : A A. −→ A basic version of the Eigenvalue Theorem goes as follows: Theorem 1.1 (Eigenvalue Theorem). When dimF A< , the eigenvalues of mf ∞ are the values of f at the finitely many solutions of (1.1) over F . For A = A F F , we have a canonical isomorphism of F -algebras ⊗ A = Aa, ∈V a F Y(f1,...,fs) where Aa is the localization of A at the maximal ideal corresponding to a. Following [12, Thm. 3.3], we get a more precise version of the Eigenvalue Theorem: arXiv:2007.12573v3 [math.AC] 28 Aug 2020 Theorem 1.2 (Stickelberger’s Theorem). For every a V (f ,...,fs), we have ∈ F 1 mf (Aa) Aa, and the restriction of mf to Aa has only one eigenvalue f(a). ⊆ This result easily implies Theorem 1.1 and enables us to compute the character- istic polynomial of mf .
    [Show full text]
  • Mor04, Mor12], Provides a Foundational Tool for 1 Solving Problems in A1-Enumerative Geometry
    THE TRACE OF THE LOCAL A1-DEGREE THOMAS BRAZELTON, ROBERT BURKLUND, STEPHEN MCKEAN, MICHAEL MONTORO, AND MORGAN OPIE Abstract. We prove that the local A1-degree of a polynomial function at an isolated zero with finite separable residue field is given by the trace of the local A1-degree over the residue field. This fact was originally suggested by Morel's work on motivic transfers, and by Kass and Wickelgren's work on the Scheja{Storch bilinear form. As a corollary, we generalize a result of Kass and Wickelgren relating the Scheja{Storch form and the local A1-degree. 1. Introduction The A1-degree, first defined by Morel [Mor04, Mor12], provides a foundational tool for 1 solving problems in A1-enumerative geometry. In contrast to classical notions of degree, 1 n n the local A -degree is not integer valued: given a polynomial function f : Ak ! Ak with 1 1 A isolated zero p, the local A -degree of f at p, denoted by degp (f), is defined to be an element of the Grothendieck{Witt group of the ground field. Definition 1.1. Let k be a field. The Grothendieck{Witt group GW(k) is defined to be the group completion of the monoid of isomorphism classes of symmetric non-degenerate bilinear forms over k. The group operation is the direct sum of bilinear forms. We may also give GW(k) a ring structure by taking tensor products of bilinear forms for our multiplication. The local A1-degree, which will be defined in Definition 2.9, can be related to other important invariants at rational points.
    [Show full text]
  • DERIVATIONS PRESERVING a MONOMIAL IDEAL 1. Introduction
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 137, Number 9, September 2009, Pages 2935–2942 S 0002-9939(09)09922-5 Article electronically published on May 4, 2009 DERIVATIONS PRESERVING A MONOMIAL IDEAL YOHANNES TADESSE (Communicated by Bernd Ulrich) Abstract. Let I be a monomial ideal in a polynomial ring A = k[x1,...,xn] over a field k of characteristic 0, TA/k(I) be the module of I-preserving k- derivations on A and G be the n-dimensional algebraic torus on k. We compute the weight spaces of TA/k(I) considered as a representation of G.Usingthis, we show that TA/k(I) preserves the integral closure of I and the multiplier ideals of I. 1. Introduction Throughout this paper TA/k denotes the module of k-linear derivations of the polynomial ring A = k[x1,...,xn]overafieldk of characteristic 0. Let G = k∗ ×···×k∗ be the n-dimensional algebraic torus on k. There is an action of θ θ1 ··· θn · θ θ1 ··· θn · G on a monomial X = x1 xn defined by (t1,...,tn) X =(t1 tn ) Xθ, and we say that Xθ has weight θ.ThismakesA arepresentationofG and induces an action of G on TA/k which will make TA/k arepresentationsuchthat θ ∈ − ⊆ X ∂xj TA/k has weight (θ1,...,θj 1,...θn). Let I A be a monomial ideal, i.e. a G-invariant ideal. Let TA/k(I)={δ ∈ TA/k | δ(I) ⊆ I}⊂TA/k be the submodule of I-preserving derivations, which is a G-subrepresentation of TA/k. Our first result is a description of the weight spaces of TA/k(I).
    [Show full text]
  • Tagungsbericht 18/1996 Kommutative Algebra Und Algebraische
    Tagungsbericht 18/1996 Kommutative Algebra und algebraische Geometrie 05.05. - 11.05.1996 Die Tagung fand unter der Leitung von Ernst Kunz (Regensburg), Josepf Lipman (West La.fayette (USA» und Uwe Storch (Bochum) statt. In den Vorträgen und Diskussionen wurde über neuere Ergebnisse und Probleme aus der kommutativen Algebra und algebraischen Geometrie berichtet und es wurden insbesondere Fragen angesprochen, die heiden Gebieten gemeinsam ent­ springen. Auch Verbindungen zu anderen Bereichen der Mathematik (Homotopie­ theorie, K -Theorie, Kombinatorik) wurden geknüpft. Eine Reihe von Vorträ.gen beschäftigte sich" mit Residuen und Spuren in der Dualitätstheorie. Weitere Schwer­ punktsthemen waren Fundamentalgruppen algebraischer Varietäten, birationale Geometrie, Frobenius- F\mktoren, Auflösungen und Hilbertfunktionen graduier­ ter Ringe und Moduln, insbesondere in Verbindung mit der Geometrie endlicher Punktmengen im pn und kombinatorischen Strukturen. In diesem Zusammen­ hang sind auch mehrere Vorträge über die· MultipllZität lokaler und graduierter Ringe zu sehen. Das große Interesse an der Tagung spiegelt sich auch in der hohen Zahl ausländischer Gäste wider. Neben den 19 deutsChen Teilnehmern kamen 10 weitere aus eu­ ropäischen Ländern (davon 3 aus Osteuropa), 12 aus Nordamerika und je einer aus Indien, Israel, Japan und Taiwan. / 1 /- © • ~'''' ~ ~ ... ~ ': I ~~ .., .., : ;" .. ' --~~ \.... ... ;' - Vortragsauszüge Abhyankar, Shreeram.S. Local Fundamental Gronps of Algebraic Varieties For a. prime number p and integer t ~ 0, let Q,(p) = the set of all quasi­ (p, t) group8, i. e., finite groups G such that G/p{G) is generated by t generators, where p(G) is the subgroup of G generated by all of its p-Sylow sub~oups; members of. Qo(p) are called quasi-p groUp8.
    [Show full text]
  • Quelques Points D'int Rt
    ATELIER INTERNATIONAL SUR LA THORIE ALGBRIQUE et ANALYTIQUE DES RSIDUS ET SES APPLICATIONS PARIS IHP du au MAI La thorie des rsidus est un domaine qui connat une rcente et intressante activit Plusieurs group es de travail se sont p enchs sur ce thme durant cette anne Cet atelier est donc lo ccasion dune prsentation confrontation et synthse des ides sur le sujet aussi bien dun p oint de vue thorique que pratique Quelques p oints dintrt Unication des direntes appro ches algbriques sur les rsidus Connexion entre les appro ches analytiques et algbriques Complexes rsiduels et leur constructions Thormes de BrianonSkoda Calculs eectifs de sommes de rsidus Applications des rsidus la thorie de llimination aux formules de reprsentations aux rsolutions de systmes p olynomiaux Orateurs invits Reinhold HBL Craig HUNEKE Ernst KUNZ Joseph LIPMAN Organisateurs Marc CHARDIN Centre de Mathmatiques Ecole p olytechnique F Palaiseau France Mohamed ELKADI Dept de Mathmatiques Univ de Nice SophiaAntipolis Parc Valrose Nice France Bernard MOURRAIN INRIA Pro jet SAFIR route des Lucioles F Valbonne France Les organisateurs ont t aids dans leur travail par les participants de deux sminaires informels sur ce sujet lun Nice Formes Formules et lautre Paris et aussi par David EISENBUD et JeanPierre JOUANOLOU Cet atelier a reu le soutien du Lab oratoire GAGE cole p olytechnique Palaiseau et du pro jet SAFIR Nice SophiaAntipolis travers le programme HCM SAC INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON ALGEBRAIC AND ANALYTIC THEORY OF RESIDUES AND ITS APPLICATIONS PARIS
    [Show full text]
  • Liftable Derivations for Generically Separably Algebraic Morphisms of Schemes
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 361, Number 1, January 2009, Pages 495–523 S 0002-9947(08)04534-0 Article electronically published on June 26, 2008 LIFTABLE DERIVATIONS FOR GENERICALLY SEPARABLY ALGEBRAIC MORPHISMS OF SCHEMES ROLF KALLSTR¨ OM¨ Abstract. We consider dominant, generically algebraic (e.g. generically fi- nite), and tamely ramified (if the characteristic is positive) morphisms π : X/S → Y/S of S-schemes, where Y,S are Nœtherian and integral and X is a Krull scheme (e.g. normal Nœtherian), and study the sheaf of tangent vector fields on Y that lift to tangent vector fields on X. We give an easily com- putable description of these vector fields using valuations along the critical locus. We apply this to answer the question when the liftable derivations can be defined by a tangency condition along the discriminant. In particular, if π is a blow-up of a coherent ideal I, we show that tangent vector fields that preserve the Ratliff-Rush ideal (equals [In+1 : In] for high n) associated to I are liftable, and that all liftable tangent vector fields preserve the integral closure of I. We also generalise in positive characteristic Seidenberg’s theorem that all tangent vector fields can be lifted to the normalisation, assuming tame ramification. Introduction Let π : X/S → Y/S be a dominant morphism of S-schemes, where Y and S are Nœtherian and X is a Krull scheme (e.g. Nœtherian and normal), so in particular X and Y are integral. Consider the diagram dπ / /C / TX/S TX/S→OY/S X/Y 0 ψ −1 π (TX/S ) O where TX/S = HomOX (ΩX/S , X )isthesheafofS-relative tangent vector fields, dπ is the tangent morphism and ψ is the canonical morphism to the sheaf TX/S→Y/S −1 of derivations from π (OY )toOX ;ifY/S is locally of finite type and either π is ∗ flat or Y/S is smooth, then TX/S→Y/S = π (TY/S).
    [Show full text]
  • An Arithmetic Enrichment of Bézout's Theorem 1
    AN ARITHMETIC ENRICHMENT OF BÉZOUT’S THEOREM STEPHEN MCKEAN Abstract. The classical version of Bézout’s Theorem gives an integer-valued count of the intersection points of hypersurfaces in projective space over an algebraically closed field. Using work of Kass and Wickelgren, we prove a version of Bézout’s Theorem over any perfect field by giving a bilinear form-valued count of the intersection points of hypersurfaces in projective space. Over non-algebraically closed fields, this enriched Bézout’s Theorem imposes a relation on the gradients of the hypersurfaces at their intersection points. As corollaries, we obtain arithmetic-geometric versions of Bézout’s Theorem over the reals, rationals, and finite fields of odd characteristic. 1. Introduction In this paper, we study the intersections of n hypersurfaces in projective n-space over an arbitrary perfect field k. Classically, Bézout’s Theorem addresses such intersections over an algebraically closed field. Theorem 1.1 (Bézout’s Theorem). Fix an algebraically closed field k. Let f1; : : : ; fn be n hypersurfaces in P , and let di be the degree of fi for each i. Assume that f1; : : : ; fn have no common components, so that f1 \ ::: \ fn is a finite set. Then, summing over the intersection points of f1; : : : ; fn, we have X (1.1) ip(f1; : : : ; fn) = d1 ··· dn; points where ip(f1; : : : ; fn) is the intersection multiplicity of f1; : : : ; fn at p. Working over an algebraically closed field is necessary for this result.1 Indeed, consider the intersection of a conic and a cubic shown in Figure 1. Over any field, these two curves do not intersect on the line at infinity.
    [Show full text]
  • Formal Methods in the Theories of Rings and Domains
    Formal Methods in the Theories of Rings and Domains Davide Rinaldi Dissertation an der Fakultät für Mathematik, Informatik und Statistik der Ludwig–Maximilians–Universität München München, den 24. Juni 2014 Formal Methods in the Theories of Rings and Domains Davide Rinaldi Dissertation an der Fakultät für Mathematik, Informatik und Statistik der Ludwig–Maximilians–Universität München vorgelegt am 24. Juni 2014 von Davide Rinaldi aus Vittorio Veneto, Italien Erstgutachter: Dr. Peter Schuster Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. Helmut Schwichtenberg Externer Gutachter: Dr. Henri Lombardi, Besançon Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 14. Juli 2014 Contents Contents v Introduction 1 1PreliminariesandResultsinFormalTopology 7 1.1 Foundation and Terminology .................... 7 1.2 Basic Pairs and Concrete Spaces .................. 9 1.2.1 Morphisms of Basic Pairs and Concrete Spaces ...... 14 1.3 Basic Topologies with Convergence Operation ........... 16 1.3.1 Morphisms of Basic Topologies with Operation ...... 20 1.4 Generation of Basic Topologies ................... 22 1.4.1 Finitary Basic Topologies .................. 25 1.4.2 Further Properties of the Convergence Operation ..... 28 1.5 Entailment Relations and Completeness Results .......... 31 1.6 Quotient and Localisation of a Basic Topology .......... 36 1.6.1 Krull Dimension of a Formal Topology ........... 39 2TheZariskiSpectrumasaBasicTopology 43 2.1 The Basic Zariski topology ..................... 44 2.1.1 The Product as Convergence Operation .......... 47 2.1.2 Ring Homomorphisms and Continuous Relations ..... 49 2.1.3 Quotients and Localisations of Zar(A) ........... 51 2.2 The Formal Zariski topology Zarf (A) ............... 54 2.2.1 Spatiality and Reducibility of Zarf (A) ........... 57 2.2.2 Connections with the Zariski Lattice ............ 65 3AConstructiveNotionofCodimension 67 3.1 Krull Dimension of the Zariski Formal Topology ........
    [Show full text]
  • The Class of Eisenbud–Khimshiashvili–Levine Is the Local A1-Brouwer Degree
    THE CLASS OF EISENBUD–KHIMSHIASHVILI–LEVINE IS THE LOCAL A1-BROUWER DEGREE JESSE LEO KASS AND KIRSTEN WICKELGREN ABSTRACT. Given a polynomial function with an isolated zero at the origin, we prove that the local A1-Brouwer degree equals the Eisenbud–Khimshiashvili–Levine class. This an- swers a question posed by David Eisenbud in 1978. We give an application to counting nodes together with associated arithmetic information by enriching Milnor’s equality be- tween the local degree of the gradient and the number of nodes into which a hypersurface singularity bifurcates to an equality in the Grothendieck–Witt group. We prove that the Eisenbud–Khimshiashvili–Levine class of a polynomial function with an isolated zero at the origin is the local A1-Brouwer degree, a result that answers a question of Eisenbud. n n The classical local Brouwer degree deg0(f) of a continuous function f: R R with an isolated zero at the origin is the image deg(f=jfj) 2 Z of the map of (n - 1)-spheres n-1 n-1 ! f=jfj: S S ; > 0 sufficiently small, n-1 n-1 under the global Brouwer degree homomorphism deg:[S ;S ] Z. ! When f is a C function, Eisenbud–Levine and independently Khimshiashvili con- ! structed a real nondegenerate1 symmetric bilinear form (more precisely, an isomorphism n class of such forms) w0(f) on the local algebra Q0(f) := C0 (R )=(f) and proved 1 (1) deg0(f) = the signature of w0(f) ([EL77, Theorem 1.2], [Khi77]; see also [AGZV12, Chapter 5] and [Khi01]). If we further n n assume that f is real analytic, then we can form the complexification fC : C C , and Palamodov [Pal67, Corollary 4] proved an analogous result for fC: ! (2) deg0(fC) = the rank of w0(f): Eisenbud observed that the definition of w0(f) remains valid when f is a polynomial with coefficients in an arbitrary field k and asked whether this form can be identified with a degree in algebraic topology [Eis78, Some remaining questions (3)].
    [Show full text]
  • Borsuk-Ulam Theorem and Hilbert's Nullstellensatz
    Borsuk-Ulam Theorem and Hilbert’s Nullstellensatz Borsuk-Ulam Theorem and Hilbert’s Dilip P. Patil Nullstellensatz § 1 Borsuk-Ulam — and vice versa Theorem §2 Borsuk’s Nullstellensatz and its Dilip P. Patil Equivalents §3 2-Fields Department of Mathematics §4 Dimension Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore and Multiplicity §5 Projective 1 Nullstellensatz Bhaskaracharya Pratishthana , Pune §6 Analogs of July 22, 2018 HNS to 2fields 1On the occasion of Birthday of Late Professor Shreeram S. Abhyankar (1930 – 2012), Founder Director, Bhaskaracharya Pratishthana, Pune. Dilip P. Patil Borsuk-Ulam Theorem and Hilbert’s Nullstellensatz Shreeram Shankar Abhayankar (22 July, 1930 – 02 Nov, 2012) Founder Director Bhaskaracharya Pratishthana, Pune. Late Professor Shreeram Shankar Abhayankar Borsuk-Ulam Theorem and Hilbert’s Nullstellensatz Dilip P. Patil § 1 Borsuk-Ulam Theorem §2 Borsuk’s Nullstellensatz and its Equivalents §3 2-Fields §4 Dimension and Multiplicity §5 Projective Nullstellensatz §6 Analogs of HNS to 2fields Dilip P. Patil Borsuk-Ulam Theorem and Hilbert’s Nullstellensatz Founder Director Bhaskaracharya Pratishthana, Pune. Late Professor Shreeram Shankar Abhayankar Borsuk-Ulam Theorem and Hilbert’s Nullstellensatz Dilip P. Patil § 1 Borsuk-Ulam Theorem §2 Borsuk’s Nullstellensatz and its Equivalents §3 2-Fields §4 Dimension Shreeram Shankar Abhayankar (22 July, 1930 – 02 Nov, 2012) and Multiplicity §5 Projective Nullstellensatz §6 Analogs of HNS to 2fields Dilip P. Patil Borsuk-Ulam Theorem and Hilbert’s Nullstellensatz Late Professor Shreeram Shankar Abhayankar Borsuk-Ulam Theorem and Hilbert’s Nullstellensatz Dilip P. Patil § 1 Borsuk-Ulam Theorem §2 Borsuk’s Nullstellensatz and its Equivalents §3 2-Fields §4 Dimension Shreeram Shankar Abhayankar (22 July, 1930 – 02 Nov, 2012) and Founder Director Multiplicity §5 Projective Bhaskaracharya Pratishthana, Pune.
    [Show full text]
  • Ideal Closures and Sheaf Stability
    Ideal Closures and Sheaf Stability Jonathan Steinbuch Fachbereich Mathematik/Informatik Universit¨atOsnabr¨uck Advisor: Holger Brenner Submitted as a doctoral thesis in September 2020 ii Contents Introduction 1 Chapters . .5 Acknowledgments . .6 1 Ideal closure operations 9 1.1 Ideal closure operations . .9 1.2 Tight closure . 12 1.3 Continuous closure and axes closure . 14 1.4 Monomial ideals . 16 1.5 Descent and reduction modulo p ................. 19 2 Continuous and tight closure 21 2.1 Axes closure and valuations . 22 2.2 Smooth and ´etale . 24 2.3 Etaleness´ descends . 26 2.4 Positive characteristic . 28 2.5 Equal characteristic 0 . 30 3 Sheaves and vector bundles 35 3.1 Locally free sheaves and vector bundles . 35 3.2 Divisors on curves . 39 3.3 Degree and twist . 41 3.4 Embeddings and the affine cone . 42 3.5 The moduli space of semistable sheaves . 44 3.6 Multilinear powers . 45 3.7 Open sets that are affine schemes and solid closure . 46 iii iv CONTENTS 4 Deciding stability of sheaves 49 4.1 Degree and global sections . 49 4.2 Symmetric and exterior powers . 51 4.3 Rank, degree and slope . 56 4.4 Destabilizing subbundles and destabilizing sections . 59 4.5 Syzygy sheaves . 62 4.6 Examples and computations . 67 4.7 Positive characteristic . 71 5 Applications and connections 75 5.1 The Harder-Narasimhan filtration . 75 5.2 Computing tight closure using semistable sheaves . 77 6 Implementation 83 6.1 Outline . 83 6.2 Main algorithm implementation details . 86 6.3 Hilbert polynomial and monomial bases .
    [Show full text]