Natural Rights, Natural Religion, and the Origins of the Free Exercise Clause
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ARTICLES REASON AND CONVICTION: NATURAL RIGHTS, NATURAL RELIGION, AND THE ORIGINS OF THE FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE Steven J. Heyman* ABSTRACT One of the most intense debates in contemporary America involves conflicts between religious liberty and other key values like civil rights. To shed light on such problems, courts and scholars often look to the historical background of the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment. But that inquiry turns out to be no less controversial. In recent years, a growing number of scholars have challenged the traditional account that focuses on the roles of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison in the movement to protect religious liberty in late eighteenth-century America. These scholars emphasize that most of the political energy behind the movement came from Evangelical Christians. On this revisionist account, we should not understand the Free Exercise Clause and corresponding state provisions in terms of the Enlightenment views of Jefferson and Madison, which these scholars characterize as secular, rationalist, and skeptical—if not hostile—toward religion. Instead, those protections were adopted for essentially religious reasons: to protect the liberty of individuals to respond to God’s will and to allow the church to carry out its mission to spread the Gospel. This Article offers a different understanding of the intellectual foundations of the Free Exercise Clause. The most basic view that supported religious liberty was neither secular rationalism nor Christian Evangelicalism but what contemporaries called natural religion. This view held that human beings were capable of using reason to discern the basic principles of religion, including the duties they owed to God and one another. Because religion was founded on reason, individuals had an inalienable natural right to develop their own beliefs and to worship in accord with them. At the same time, that right was limited by the law of nature and reason, which required people to respect the rights of others. In this way, the concept of natural religion established both the foundations and the limits of religious liberty. This view enabled people with different religious and philosophical perspectives to find common ground. It provided the basis for a political coalition between Evangelicals, rationalist Christians, and Enlightenment * Professor of Law, Chicago-Kent College of Law, Illinois Tech. A.B. 1979, J.D. 1984, Harvard. This Article was presented at a Chicago-Kent faculty workshop in November 2019. For their thoughts on previous versions, I am grateful to Sungjoon Cho, David Franklin, Andrew Ingram, Nancy Marder, Mark Rosen, Stephanie Stern, and Cristina Tilley. Kathleen Brady and Steven D. Smith were remarkably generous with their insights and knowledge, which did much to improve the article. Sofiia Kulitska, LL.M. 2019, and Rawan Hishmeh, J.D. 2021, provided valuable research assistance. As always, I want to thank my wife, Alison Kate Baldwin, for her wise counsel. I owe a special debt of gratitude to Mandy Lee, Nicole Mszal, and other members of the Chicago-Kent library and administrative staff for their extraordinary efforts in obtaining and archiving many of the historical materials used in this Article. 1 2 JOURNAL OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW [Vol. 23:1 liberals that secured the adoption of state and federal constitutional guarantees for religious freedom. The Article begins by demonstrating that natural religion and its associated ideas of natural law and natural rights were central to the intellectual world of eighteenth-century Americans. Those ideas played a vital part in many areas of thought, including political and moral philosophy, natural jurisprudence, English law, Christian and Deist theology, and even Newtonian natural science—intellectual strands that came together in the Radical Whig ideology that animated the American Revolution. Next, I explain how those ideas can enhance our understanding of the religious-liberty provisions of the first state declarations of rights; the political controversy that culminated in the passage of Jefferson’s Bill for Establishing Religious Freedom in Virginia; and the debates surrounding the adoption of the Federal Constitution and the Free Exercise Clause itself. Finally, I explore the founders’ views on the problem of religious exemptions from civil laws, and discuss the implications of this history for our current debates over civil rights and religious liberty—a subject that the Supreme Court recently grappled with in Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, and that is before the Court again this Term in Fulton v. City of Philadelphia. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 4 I. JOHN LOCKE ON RELIGION, TOLERATION, AND THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CHURCH AND STATE ........................................................ 10 A. Locke on Natural Religion .............................................................. 10 1. The Concept of Natural Religion ............................................ 10 2. The Limits of Natural Religion and the Need for Revealed Religion ................................................................................... 13 3. The Relationship Between Faith and Reason ......................... 15 B. Locke on Religious Liberty and the Separation of Church and State ............................................................................................... 17 1. Religious Liberty ....................................................................... 17 2. Separation of Church and State ............................................... 20 3. The Limits of Religious Liberty and Toleration ..................... 20 C. Conclusion ....................................................................................... 22 II. NATURAL RELIGION IN EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY THOUGHT................ 22 A. The Law of Nature and Nations ..................................................... 23 B. English Law and the Toleration Act of 1689 ................................. 28 C. Moral Philosophy ............................................................................ 34 1. Sentimentalism and the Scottish Enlightenment ..................... 34 January 2021] ORIGINS OF THE FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE 3 2. Rationalism ............................................................................... 38 3. Uniting Reason and Sentiment ................................................ 40 D. Theology ......................................................................................... 41 1. Deism ........................................................................................ 42 2. Anglicanism .............................................................................. 44 3. New England Congregationalism ............................................. 47 E. Natural Science ................................................................................ 51 F. The Radical Whig Tradition ........................................................... 53 G. Conclusion ...................................................................................... 56 III. THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION AND THE FIRST STATE CONSTITUTIONS ................................................................................. 56 A. The Revolution................................................................................ 56 B. The First State Constitutions and Declarations of Rights .............. 58 1. Virginia ...................................................................................... 58 2. Pennsylvania ............................................................................. 60 3. Massachusetts ........................................................................... 62 4. Conclusion ................................................................................ 64 IV. THE BATTLE OVER RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN 1780S VIRGINIA ............ 67 A. The Controversies of the Mid-1780s .............................................. 67 1. The General Assessment Bill .................................................. 67 2. Jefferson’s Bill for Establishing Religious Freedom ................ 73 B. Interpreting the Virginia Controversy ............................................. 76 C. Conclusion ....................................................................................... 88 V. THE ADOPTION OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION AND BILL OF RIGHTS ................................................................................................. 92 A. The Debate over the Constitution .................................................. 92 1. The Demand for a Bill of Rights ............................................. 92 2. The Ban on Religious Tests ..................................................... 94 B. The Free Exercise Clause and the Bill of Rights ........................... 97 VI. RELIGIOUS EXEMPTIONS FROM CIVIL LAWS .......................................101 A. Background ...................................................................................101 B. General Views on a Right to Religious Exemption During the Founding Era ..............................................................................103 4 JOURNAL OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW [Vol. 23:1 C. The Congressional Debates over Religious Exemption from Militia Duty .............................................................................................110 1. The Debate over the Bill of Rights ........................................110