DOCSLIB.ORG

White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack by Peggy Mcintosh Male Privilege

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack by Peggy McIntosh male privilege. So I have begun in an un-tutored way to ask what it is like to I was taught to see racism Through work to bring materials have white privilege. I have come to only in individual acts of from Women’s Studies into the rest of see white privilege as an invisible meanness, not in invisible the curriculum, I have often noticed package of unearned assets which I can men’s unwillingness to grant that they count on cashing in each day, but about systems conferring dominance are over-privileged, even though they which I was ‘meant’ to remain oblivious. White privilege is like an on my group. may grant that women are disadvantaged. They may say that they invisible weightless knapsack of special provisions, maps, passports, will work to improve women’s status, effects of white privilege in my life. I in the society, the university, or the codebooks, visas, clothes, tools and blank checks. have chosen those conditions which I curriculum, but they can’t or won’t think in my case attach somewhat support the idea of lessening men’s. Describing white privilege makes one newly accountable. As we in more to skin-color privilege than to Denials which amount to taboos class, religion, ethnic status, or surround the subject of advantages Women’s Studies work to reveal male privilege and ask men to give up some geographical location, though of which men gain from women’s course all these other factors are disadvantages. These denials protect of their power, so one who writes about having white privilege must ask, intricately intertwined. As far as I can male privilege from being fully see, my African American co[workers, acknowledged, lessened or ended. “Having described it, what will I do to lessen or end it?” friends and acquaintances with whom I Thinking through unacknowledged come into daily or frequent contact in male privilege as a phenomenon, I After I realized the extent to which men work from a base of this particular time, place, and line of realized that since hierarchies in our work cannot count on most of these society are interlocking, there was unacknowledged privilege, I understood that much of their conditions. most likely a phenomenon of white privilege which was similarly denied oppressiveness was unconscious. Then I remembered the frequent charges 1. I can if I wish arrange to be in the and protected. As a white person, I company of people of my race most of realized I had been taught about racism from women of color that white women whom they encounter are the time. as something which puts others at a disadvantage, but had been taught not oppressive. I began to understand why we are justly seen as oppressive, even 2. If I should need to move, I can be to see one of its corollary aspects, pretty sure of renting or purchasing white privilege, which puts me at an when we don’t see ourselves that way. I began to count the ways in which I housing in an area which I can afford advantage. and in which I want to live. I think whites are carefully taught not enjoy unearned skin privilege and have been conditioned into oblivion about to recognize white privilege, as males 3. I can be pretty sure that my are taught not to recognize its existence. My schooling gave me no training in neighbors in such a location will be neutral or pleasant to me. Peggy McIntosh is Associate Director of seeing myself as an oppressor, as an the Wellesley College Center for Research unfairly advantaged person, or as a on Women. This essay is excerpted from participant in a damaged culture. I was 4. I can go shopping alone most of the her working pager, “White Privilege and taught to see myself as an individual time, pretty well assured that I will not Male Privilege: A Personal Account of whose moral state depended on her be followed or harassed. Coming to See Correspondences Through individual moral will. My schooling Work in Women’s Studies,” copyright © followed the pattern my colleague 5. I can turn on the television or open 1988 by Peggy McIntosh. Available for Elizabeth Minnich has pointed out: to the front page of the paper and see $4.oo from address below. The paper people of my race widely represented. includes a longer list of privileges. whites are taught to think of their lives Permission to excerpt or reprint must be as morally neutral, normative, and obtained from Peggy McIntosh, Wellesley average, and also ideal, so that when 6. When I am told about our national College Center for Research on Women, we work to benefit others, this is seen heritage or about “civilization,” I am Wellesley, MA 02181; (617) 283-2520; Fax as work which will allow “them” to be shown that people of my color made it (617) 283-2504 more like “us.” what it is. I decided to try to work on myself at least by identifying some of the daily Peace and Freedom y July/August 1989 7. I can be sure that my children will 19. If a traffic cop pulls me over or if privilege, for some of these varieties be given curricular materials that the IRS audits my tax return, I can be are only what one would want for testify to the existence of their race. sure I haven’t been singled out because everyone in a just society, and others of my race give license to be ignorant, oblivious, 8. If I want to, I can be pretty sure of arrogant and destructive. finding a publisher for this piece on 20. I can easily buy posters, postcards, I see a pattern running through the white privilege. picture books, greeting cards, dolls, matrix of white privilege, a pattern of toys, and children’s magazines assumptions which were passed on to 9. I can go into a music shop and featuring people of my race. me as a white person. There was one count on finding the music of my race main piece of cultural turf; it was my represented, into a supermarket and 21. I can go home from most meetings own turf, and I was among those who find the staple foods which fit with my of organizations I belong to feeling could control the turf. My skin color cultural traditions, into a hairdresser’s somewhat tied in, rather than isolated, was an asset for any move I was shop and find someone who can cut out-of-place, outnumbered, unheard, educated to want to make. I could my hair. held at a distance, or feared. think of myself as belonging in major ways, and of making social systems 10. Whether I use checks, credit cards, 22. I can take a job with an affirmative work for me. I could freely disparage, or cash, I can count on my skin color action employer without having co- fear, neglect, or be oblivious to not to work against the appearance of workers on the job suspect that I got it anything outside of the dominant financial reliability. because of race. cultural forms. Being of the main culture, I could also criticize it fairly 11. I can arrange to protect my 23. I can choose public freely. children most of the time from people accommodation without fearing that In proportion as my racial group was who might not like them. people of my race cannot get in or will being made confident, comfortable, be mistreated in the places I have and oblivious, other groups were likely 12. I can sear, or dress in second hand chosen. being made unconfident, clothes, or not answer letters, without uncomfortable, and alienated. having people attribute these choices to 24. I can be sure that if I need legal or Whiteness protected me from many the bad morals, the poverty, or the medical help, my race will not work kinds of hostility, distress and illiteracy of my race. against me. violence, which I was being subtly trained to visit in turn upon people of 13. I can speak in public to a powerful 25. If my day, week, or year is going color. male group without putting my race on badly, I need not ask of each negative For this reason, the word “privilege” trial. episode or situation whether it has now seems to me misleading. We racial overtones. usually think of privilege as being a 14. I can do well in a challenging favored state, whether earned or situation without being called a credit 26. I can choose blemish cover or conferred by birth or luck. Yes some to my race. bandages in “flesh” color and have of the conditions I have described here them more or less match my skin. work to systematically over empower 15. I am never asked to speak for all certain groups. Such privilege simply the people of my racial group. I repeatedly forgot each of the confers dominance because of one’s realizations on this list until I wrote it race or sex. 16. I can remain oblivious of the down. For me white privilege has I want, then, to distinguish between language and customs of persons of turned out to be an elusive and fugitive earned strength and unearned power color who constitute the world’s subject. The pressure to avoid it is conferred systemically. Power from majority without feeling in my culture great, for in facing it I must give up the unearned privilege can look like any penalty for such oblivion.
Recommended publications
  • The Trouble We''re In: Privilege, Power, and Difference

    The Trouble We''re In: Privilege, Power, and Difference

    The Trouble Were In: Privilege, Power, and Difference Allan G. Johnson Thetroublearounddifferenceisreallyaboutprivilegeandpowertheexistenceofprivilege andthelopsideddistributionofpowerthatkeepsitgoing.Thetroubleisrootedinalegacyweall inherited,andwhilewerehere,itbelongstous.Itisntourfault.Itwasntcausedbysomethingwedid ordidntdo.Butnowitsallours,itsuptoustodecidehowweregoingtodealwithitbeforewe collectivelypassitalongtothegenerationsthatwillfollowours. Talkingaboutpowerandprivilegeisnteasy,whichiswhypeoplerarelydo.Thereasonforthis omissionseemstobeagreatfearofanythingthatmightmakewhitesormalesorheterosexuals uncomfortableorpitgroupsagainsteachother,1eventhoughgroupsarealreadypittedagainstone anotherbythestructuresofprivilegethatorganizesocietyasawhole.Thefearkeepspeoplefrom lookingatwhatsgoingonandmakesitimpossibletodoanythingabouttherealitythatliesdeeper down,sothattheycanmovetowardthekindofworldthatwouldbebetterforeveryone. Difference Is Not the Problem Ignoringprivilegekeepsusinastateofunreality,bypromotingtheillusionthedifferenceby itselfistheproblem.Insomeways,ofcourse,itcanbeaproblemwhenpeopletrytoworktogether acrossculturaldividesthatsetgroupsuptothinkanddothingstheirownway.Buthumanbeingshave beenovercomingsuchdividesforthousandsofyearsasamatterofroutine.Therealillusionconnected todifferenceisthepopularassumptionthatpeoplearenaturallyafraidofwhattheydontknowor understand.Thissupposedlymakesitinevitablethatyoullfearanddistrustpeoplewhoarentlikeyou and,inspiteofyourgoodintentions,youllfinditallbutimpossibletogetalongwiththem.
  • Perspectives of White UCT Students on Social Transformation Initiatives

    Perspectives of White UCT Students on Social Transformation Initiatives

    Perspectives of white UCT students on Social Transformation Initiatives Zenzile Molo Student Number: MLXZEN001 University of Cape Town Supervisor: Dr Wahbie Long Co-Supervisor: Dr Taryn van Niekerk Word Count: Abstract: 175 Main body:8181 Abstract In a post-apartheid South Africa, scholars across all disciplines have contributed to the study of transformation, race and ‘rainbowism’. Although a substantial amount of this literature features the voices of the marginalised majority, there are only a handful of studies that are focused on privileged white South Africans. This research begins to address this gap, by investigating the understanding and constructs of social transformation initiatives amongst white undergraduate students at the University of Cape Town. Three focus groups, each consisting of six participants, were conducted. A thematic analysis demonstrates that white students understand transformation as accessibility, equality and opportunity for other racial groups to climb the ladder and be equivalent to whites. Furthermore, while some students understand challenges to white privilege as critical to social and racial transformation initiatives, others employ strategies to resist ideas that counter white privilege. The paper concludes by arguing that this tension provides an opportunity for further exploration around constructions of transformation initiatives amongst young white South Africans. Keywords: accessibility; equality; opportunities; privileges; justice; transformation; education; language; apartheid; land; FeesMustFall Introduction In 2015, young black South African students stood in solidarity against injustices, inequalities and colonial images of the past calling for transformation, such as the #RhodesMustFall movement (Chaudhuri, 2016) which led to the #FeeMustFall campaign (Raju, 2017). These black students sound a call for a free decolonised education and a call to dismantle the legacy of colonialism and apartheid.
  • Debunking the Myth of Universal Male Privilege

    Debunking the Myth of Universal Male Privilege

    University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform Volume 49 2016 Debunking the Myth of Universal Male Privilege Jamie R. Abrams University of Louisville Louis D. Brandeis School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjlr Part of the Law and Gender Commons, Law and Society Commons, and the Military, War, and Peace Commons Recommended Citation Jamie R. Abrams, Debunking the Myth of Universal Male Privilege, 49 U. MICH. J. L. REFORM 303 (2016). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjlr/vol49/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DEBUNKING THE MYTH OF UNIVERSAL MALE PRIVILEGE Jamie R. Abrams* Existing legal responses to sexual assault and harassment in the military have stagnated or failed. Current approaches emphasize the prevalence of sexual assault and highlight the masculine nature of the military’s statistical composition and institutional culture. Current responses do not, however, incorporate masculinities theory to disentangle the experiences of men as a group from men as individuals. Rather, embedded within contestations of the masculine military culture is the un- stated assumption that the culture universally privileges or benefits the individual men that operate within it. This myth is harmful because it tethers masculinities to military efficacy, suppresses the costs of male violence to men, and positions women as perpetual outsiders.
  • Discussion Guide for Educators

    Discussion Guide for Educators

    DISCUSSION GUIDE FOR EDUCATORS Guide by Valeria Brown, MEd Beacon Press | beacon.org/whitefragility WHY SHOULD EDUCATORS READ WHITE FRAGILITY? White Fragility is a must-read for all educators because racial disparities in access and opportunity continue to be an urgent issue in our schools. An educator’s belief system can and does significantly impact how they approach teaching and learning.1 Therefore, in a school system in which the teaching population remains primarily white and the student population continues to become more racially diverse, it is necessary for ed- ucators to develop the skills to engage in conversations about bias, race, and racism—especially their own.2 Additionally, despite an educator’s best efforts, it is impossible to shield students from the hate-based violence they are exposed to on a national level. A report by the Southern Poverty Law Center, found that the rhetoric used by Donald Trump and his supporters, before and during the presidential campaign, had a significant impact on school climate.3 Teachers reported an increase in verbal harassment of students, the use of slurs and derogatory language, and instances involving swastikas, Nazi salutes, and Confederate flags. Eight in ten teachers reported heightened anxiety from students in marginalized groups, including immigrants, Muslims, African Americans, and LGBTQ youth. Each month, Teaching Tolerance, a project of SPLC, tracks and publishes hate incidents at US schools. The latest report, from November 2018, found that there were 59 reported incidents in classrooms, at school events, and on social media.4 Regrettably, stu- dents are living with hate in their midst at school, too, and it is imperative that educators take action.
  • White by Law---Haney Lopez (Abridged Version)

    White by Law---Haney Lopez (Abridged Version)

    White by Law The Legal Construction of Race Revised and Updated 10th Anniversary Edition Ian Haney Lόpez NEW YORK UNIVERSITY PRESS New York and London (2006) 1│White Lines In its first words on the subject of citizenship, Congress in 1790 restricted naturalization to “white persons.” Though the requirements for naturalization changed frequently thereafter, this racial prerequisite to citizenship endured for over a century and a half, remaining in force until 1952. From the earliest years of this country until just a generation ago, being a “white person” was a condition for acquiring citizenship. Whether one was “white” however, was often no easy question. As immigration reached record highs at the turn of this century, countless people found themselves arguing their racial identity in order to naturalize. From 1907, when the federal government began collecting data on naturalization, until 1920, over one million people gained citizenship under the racially restrictive naturalization laws. Many more sought to naturalize and were rejected. Naturalization rarely involved formal court proceedings and therefore usually generated few if any written records beyond the simple decision. However, a number of cases construing the “white person” prerequisite reached the highest state and federal judicial circles, and two were argued before the U.S. Supreme Court in the early 1920s. These cases produced illuminating published decisions that document the efforts of would-be citizens from around the world to establish their Whiteness at law. Applicants from Hawaii, China, Japan, Burma, and the Philippines, as well as all mixed- race applicants, failed in their arguments. Conversely, courts ruled that applicants from Mexico and Armenia were “white,” but vacillated over the Whiteness of petitioners from Syria, India, and Arabia.
  • Racial Equity Plan

    Racial Equity Plan

    RED WING'S RACIAL EQUITY PLAN D R A F T : 2 0 2 1 Table of Contents Page 2: ............ Table of Contents Page 3: ............ City Mission and Vision Page 4: ............ Our Commitment to Racial Justice Page 5: ............ Acknowledgement of Harm Page 6: ............ Definitions: Working Toward Racial Justice Pages 7-8: ....... Why We Need to Do Better Page 9: ............ Timeline of Racial Equity Work P#ag2es 10-13: ..... Racial Equity Plan Draft Page 14-15: ...... How We Will Plan & Evaluate Progress W W W . R E D - W I N G . O R G 2 Red Wing's Vision Red Wing thrives as a vibrant, creative river town that values its natural environment, welcomes all people, and unlocks opportunity for everyone. Red Wing's Mission We strive to create a sustainable, healthy, accessible, resilient, and equitable community where every person #2 feels at home. How We'll Act We will create and maintain strong partnerships, be responsive to residents, and foster an active, healthy community where everyone feels welcomed, connected, represented, and encouraged to shape Red Wing's future. W W W . R E D - W I N G . O R G 32 Our Commitment to Racial Justice We seek to build a culture of inclusion and equity in Red Wing because all residents are vital to the spirit and success of our community. We desire to become a place where people of all races, ages, abilities, incomes, and backgrounds thrive and feel heard and connected. We will work so our city will be a place We now commit to acknowledging that where our elected and appointed pain and improving city policies and officials, city staff, schools, businesses, practices to consider the intended and nonprofits, boards, and other decision- unintended impacts that affect making entities all reflect the residents’ quality of life.
  • MIAMI UNIVERSITY the Graduate School

    MIAMI UNIVERSITY the Graduate School

    MIAMI UNIVERSITY The Graduate School Certificate for Approving the Dissertation We hereby approve the Dissertation of Bridget Christine Gelms Candidate for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy ______________________________________ Dr. Jason Palmeri, Director ______________________________________ Dr. Tim Lockridge, Reader ______________________________________ Dr. Michele Simmons, Reader ______________________________________ Dr. Lisa Weems, Graduate School Representative ABSTRACT VOLATILE VISIBILITY: THE EFFECTS OF ONLINE HARASSMENT ON FEMINIST CIRCULATION AND PUBLIC DISCOURSE by Bridget C. Gelms As our digital environments—in their inhabitants, communities, and cultures—have evolved, harassment, unfortunately, has become the status quo on the internet (Duggan, 2014 & 2017; Jane, 2014b). Harassment is an issue that disproportionately affects women, particularly women of color (Citron, 2014; Mantilla, 2015), LGBTQIA+ women (Herring et al., 2002; Warzel, 2016), and women who engage in social justice, civil rights, and feminist discourses (Cole, 2015; Davies, 2015; Jane, 2014a). Whitney Phillips (2015) notes that it’s politically significant to pay attention to issues of online harassment because this kind of invective calls “attention to dominant cultural mores” (p. 7). Keeping our finger on the pulse of such attitudes is imperative to understand who is excluded from digital publics and how these exclusions perpetuate racism and sexism to “preserve the internet as a space free of politics and thus free of challenge to white masculine heterosexual hegemony” (Higgin, 2013, n.p.). While rhetoric and writing as a field has a long history of examining myriad exclusionary practices that occur in public discourses, we still have much work to do in understanding how online harassment, particularly that which is gendered, manifests in digital publics and to what rhetorical effect.
  • Exploring Race and Privilege

    Exploring Race and Privilege

    Exploring Race and Privilege Exploring Race and Privilege presents materials on culturally responsive supervision from the second of a three‐part series designed for supervisors in teacher education. This series was developed in partnership with Dr. Tanisha Brandon‐ Felder, a consultant in professional development on equity pedagogy. This document contains handouts, planning tools, readings, and other materials to provide field supervisors with a scaffolded experience to improve their ability for culturally responsive supervision. The following materials build on the trust and community developed through the first set of activities The Power of Identity. Exploration of race and concepts such as white privilege will necessitate shared understanding of language and norms for conversation. 1. Understanding the Language of Race and Diversity 2. Ground Rules for Conversation 3. Color Line Instructions 4. Color Line Handout 5. White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack by Peggy McIntosh Understanding the Language of Race and Diversity Terms we all need to know: PREJUDICE Pre‐judgment, bias DISCRIMINATION Prejudice + action OPPRESSION Discrimination + systemic power. (Systemic advantage based on a particular social identity.) Racism = oppression based race‐ the socially constructed meaning attached to a variety of physical attributes including but not limited to skin and eye color, hair texture, and bone structure of people in the US and elsewhere. racism‐ the conscious or unconscious, intentional or unintentional, enactment of racial power, grounded in racial prejudice, by an individual or group against another individual or group perceived to have lower racial status. Types of racism: Internalized Racism Lies within individuals. Refers to private beliefs and biases about race and racism.
  • EXPLAINING WHITE PRIVILEGE to a BROKE WHITE PERSON... Gina Crosley-Corcoran

    EXPLAINING WHITE PRIVILEGE to a BROKE WHITE PERSON... Gina Crosley-Corcoran

    EXPLAINING WHITE PRIVILEGE TO A BROKE WHITE PERSON... Gina Crosley-Corcoran Years ago, some feminist on the internet told me I was "Privileged." "WTH?!?" I said. I came from the kind of Poor that people don't want to believe still exists in this country. Have you ever spent a frigid northern Illinois winter without heat or running water? I have. At twelve years old, were you making ramen noodles in a coffee maker with water you fetched from a public bathroom? I was. Have you ever lived in a camper year round and used a random relative's apartment as your mailing address? We did. Did you attend so many different elementary schools that you can only remember a quarter of their names? Welcome to my childhood. So when that feminist told me I had "white privilege," I told her that my white skin didn't do shit to prevent me from experiencing poverty. Then, like any good, educated feminist would, she directed me to Peggy McIntosh's 1988 now-famous piece, "White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack." After one reads McIntosh's powerful essay, it's impossible to deny that being born with white skin in America affords people certain unearned privileges in life that people of another skin color simple are not afforded. For example: "I can turn on the television or open to the front page of the paper and see people of my race widely represented." "When I am told about our national heritage or about “civilization,” I am shown that people of my color made it what it is." "If a traffic cop pulls me over or if the IRS audits my tax return, I can be sure I haven’t been singled out because of my race." "I can if I wish arrange to be in the company of people of my race most of the time." If you read through the rest of the list, you can see how white people and people of color experience the world in two very different ways.
  • Multidimensionality Is to Masculinities What Intersectionality Is to Feminism.” This Article Proceeds in Three Parts

    Multidimensionality Is to Masculinities What Intersectionality Is to Feminism.” This Article Proceeds in Three Parts

    \\jciprod01\productn\N\NVJ\13-2\NVJ203.txt unknown Seq: 1 16-MAY-13 12:52 MULTIDIMENSIONALITY ISTO MASCULINITIES WHAT INTERSECTIONALITY IS TO FEMINISM Athena D. Mutua* This Article explores the intellectual history of the emergence and pairing of multidimensionality theory and masculinities theory in the legal academy as tools for analyzing men’s experiences, practices, powers, and lives.1 It argues that the pairing of these two theories—as opposed to a pairing of intersectional theory and masculinities theory—is largely a function of history, but one that responded to perceived limitations of intersectional theory. These limitations included the fact that intersectionality had primarily been applied to women’s lives but also included the very manner in which women’s lives were often seen and analyzed. The Article arises out of a debate that ensued at the conference on Mul- tidimensional Masculinities and Law: A Colloquium, held at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, William S. Boyd School of Law in 2011.2 In terms of masculinities theory, as the title of the colloquium suggests, many of the collo- quium participants were multidimensionality theory enthusiasts. I am included in that group. In my conference presentation, I intimated that multidimensional- ity theory better captured the complexity of analyzing men’s lives as seen through masculinities theory because of its insistence on context. I was more specific in my paper,3 in which I praised the multidimensional turn in intersec- tional theory and sought to situate an earlier project on “progressive black mas- culinities” more deeply in it.4 I noted: I believe the multidimensional turn in intersectionality theory better situates mascu- line identities and practices within the matrix of socially constructed hierarchies, bet- ter explains the synergistic interplay between categories such as gender and race, and better explains the role context plays in that interaction.
  • Color Chart Colorchart

    Color Chart Colorchart

    Color Chart AMERICANA ACRYLICS Snow (Titanium) White White Wash Cool White Warm White Light Buttermilk Buttermilk Oyster Beige Antique White Desert Sand Bleached Sand Eggshell Pink Chiffon Baby Blush Cotton Candy Electric Pink Poodleskirt Pink Baby Pink Petal Pink Bubblegum Pink Carousel Pink Royal Fuchsia Wild Berry Peony Pink Boysenberry Pink Dragon Fruit Joyful Pink Razzle Berry Berry Cobbler French Mauve Vintage Pink Terra Coral Blush Pink Coral Scarlet Watermelon Slice Cadmium Red Red Alert Cinnamon Drop True Red Calico Red Cherry Red Tuscan Red Berry Red Santa Red Brilliant Red Primary Red Country Red Tomato Red Naphthol Red Oxblood Burgundy Wine Heritage Brick Alizarin Crimson Deep Burgundy Napa Red Rookwood Red Antique Maroon Mulberry Cranberry Wine Natural Buff Sugared Peach White Peach Warm Beige Coral Cloud Cactus Flower Melon Coral Blush Bright Salmon Peaches 'n Cream Coral Shell Tangerine Bright Orange Jack-O'-Lantern Orange Spiced Pumpkin Tangelo Orange Orange Flame Canyon Orange Warm Sunset Cadmium Orange Dried Clay Persimmon Burnt Orange Georgia Clay Banana Cream Sand Pineapple Sunny Day Lemon Yellow Summer Squash Bright Yellow Cadmium Yellow Yellow Light Golden Yellow Primary Yellow Saffron Yellow Moon Yellow Marigold Golden Straw Yellow Ochre Camel True Ochre Antique Gold Antique Gold Deep Citron Green Margarita Chartreuse Yellow Olive Green Yellow Green Matcha Green Wasabi Green Celery Shoot Antique Green Light Sage Light Lime Pistachio Mint Irish Moss Sweet Mint Sage Mint Mint Julep Green Jadeite Glass Green Tree Jade
  • Critical Whiteness Studies and the “Jewish Problem”

    Critical Whiteness Studies and the “Jewish Problem”

    Balázs Berkovits Critical Whiteness Studies and the “Jewish Problem” The “whiteness” of Jews has recently become a popular topic both in public debates and in academic research (Critical Whiteness Studies). Within this discourse, “whiteness” is used as a critical concept denoting those who enjoy white privilege in American and other Western societies. However, attributing “whiteness” to Jews is more than controversial, for it assimilates the most persecuted minority in European history to the dominant majority, while downgrading the significance of antisemitism. This is a necessary move in order to reaffirm and critically address the fundamental nature of the black and white divide; however, it is questionable both methodologically and politically. Debates about Jewish whiteness Recently, there have been several debates in American newspapers and in the Jewish and Israeli press about whether “Jews were white.” For sure, the basic issue here is the meaning we attach to “whiteness” when attributing it to Jews, and the reason for doing so. Why should there be such debates? Furthermore, why does this topic seem to be so popular, and what are its stakes? The “whiteness” of Jews can be approached from two fundamentally opposing points of view, which entail two different meanings of whiteness. And even though the two meanings are linked, their respective usages are very different. The first usage is descriptive or interpretative, whereas the second is critical (these two are summarized with a special emphasis on the first, but not sufficiently distinguished from each other, by Green 2016b). From the first perspective, the question posed is whether Jews are still considered part of the nation, particularly in the American context, in a time when, under the Trump presidency, the Alt-Right has gained significant influence.