Kaluga Region Region Development Indicators

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Kaluga Region Region Development Indicators

RELIABILITY INNOVATIONS PARTNERSHIP 2014 Moscow Moscow REGION IN THE HEART Region OF RUSSIA 2 Smolensk Region Kaluga Tula Lyudinovo Region Bryansk region Total area Population 20 million 29 900 km2 in the region in 180 kilometers' 1.01 million vicinity INVESTMENT POLICY 3 KALUGA REGION REGION DEVELOPMENT INDICATORS 4 Investment 150 projects $ 13.8 $ 2.5 billion billion Investments annual (since 2006) investment INVESTMENT POLICY 5 BEST CONDITIONS DEVELOPMENT FOR BUSINESS INSTITUTIONS Project support at the federal level Agency for Regional Development Tax benefits Kaluga Region Development Corporation Kaluga Region representative office in Moscow Legislative warranties Agribusiness Development Agency Free project Support Agency for Development of Small Business 1 Moscow INFRASTRUCTURE Region 2 FOR BUSINESS 9 3 6 5 Smolensk 7 4 6 Region Kaluga «LYUDINOVO» special economic zone 10 8 Tula Region Bryansk region 10 2 freight 2 industrial villages Airports parks WE PRODUCE AND DEVELOP 7 Cars Steam Railway Locomotives and trucks and gas construction turbines and maintenance Cast-iron Construction Radio- Pharmaceutical and steel work materials electronics products Paper Furniture Logistics IT and woodwork and other goods LOGISTICSKALUGA AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY 8 41% share of automotive production in the industry of Kaluga region 1 000 000 vehicles produced since 2007 3 OEM 27 SUPPLIERS «LYUDINOVO» SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONE 9 Favorable location Low cost of land 372 ha Tax benefits and customs preferences Lyudinovo 237 ha Free connection to infrastructure Glasshouse Complex project Legal guarantees LYUDINOVO SEZ 10 18% for 0% the others 0% Income tax for certain types Transport tax for of economic activity till 2018 10 years 2,2% for 0% the others 0% Property tax Land tax for for 10 years 5 years FREIGHT VILLAGE RU 11 Centralized Integration Multimodal management into any 3PL terminal structure system KALUGA AIRPORT 12 Expected passenger by 2020 Capacity traffic flow (people 250 000 (pass./hour) 100 per year) 500 000 by 2030 MODERN EDUCATION 13 PROFESSIONAL CLASSICAL INTERNATIONAL TRAINING EDUCATION SCHOOL Automotive Training Center International 7500 diploma Pharmaceutical Training Center Graduates Pre-school Dual Training system yearly Education center PERSPECTIVE AREAS FOR BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT 14 Construction Pharmaceutical Innovation Machinery Automotive industry Agribusiness Wood processing WELCOME TO KALUGA REGION! investkaluga.com.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Index Cards by Country RUSSIA
Index cards by country RUSSIA SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONES Index cards realized by the University of Reims, France Conception: F. Bost Data collected by F. Bost and D. Messaoudi Map and layout: S. Piantoni WFZO Index cards - Russia Year of promulgation of the first text Official Terms for Free Zones of law concerning the Free Zones Special economic zones (SEZ) 1988 Exact number of Free Zones Possibility to be established as Free Points 27 Special economic zones (include 8 in project) No TABLE OF CONTENTS Free Zones ..........................................................................................................................................4 General information ........................................................................................................................................................................4 List of operating Free Zones .........................................................................................................................................................6 Contacts ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 16 2 WFZO Index cards - Russia UNITED STATES Oslo Berlin Stockholm 22 27 Helsinki 12 05 Minsk 21 11 10 Kyiv 04 Moscow 15 Chisinau 08 25 01 14 26 24 06 02 Volgograd RUSSIA 03 Sverdlovsk Ufa 07 Chelyabinsk Omsk 13 Yerevan Astana Novosibirsk Baku 20 23 16 18 KAZAKHSTAN 17 Tehran Tashkent Ulaanbaatar Ashgabat 09 Bishkek IRAN MONGOLIA 19
[Show full text]
Demographic, Economic, Geospatial Data for Municipalities of the Central Federal District in Russia (Excluding the City of Moscow and the Moscow Oblast) in 2010-2016
Population and Economics 3(4): 121–134 DOI 10.3897/popecon.3.e39152 DATA PAPER Demographic, economic, geospatial data for municipalities of the Central Federal District in Russia (excluding the city of Moscow and the Moscow oblast) in 2010-2016 Irina E. Kalabikhina1, Denis N. Mokrensky2, Aleksandr N. Panin3 1 Faculty of Economics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, Russia 2 Independent researcher 3 Faculty of Geography, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, Russia Received 10 December 2019 ♦ Accepted 28 December 2019 ♦ Published 30 December 2019 Citation: Kalabikhina IE, Mokrensky DN, Panin AN (2019) Demographic, economic, geospatial data for munic- ipalities of the Central Federal District in Russia (excluding the city of Moscow and the Moscow oblast) in 2010- 2016. Population and Economics 3(4): 121–134. https://doi.org/10.3897/popecon.3.e39152 Keywords Data base, demographic, economic, geospatial data JEL Codes: J1, J3, R23, Y10, Y91 I. Brief description The database contains demographic, economic, geospatial data for 452 municipalities of the 16 administrative units of the Central Federal District (excluding the city of Moscow and the Moscow oblast) for 2010–2016 (Appendix, Table 1; Fig. 1). The sources of data are the municipal-level statistics of Rosstat, Google Maps data and calculated indicators. II. Data resources Data package title: Demographic, economic, geospatial data for municipalities of the Cen- tral Federal District in Russia (excluding the city of Moscow and the Moscow oblast) in 2010–2016. Copyright I.E. Kalabikhina, D.N.Mokrensky, A.N.Panin The article is publicly available and in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC-BY 4.0) can be used without limits, distributed and reproduced on any medium, pro- vided that the authors and the source are indicated.
[Show full text]
Malignant Neoplasms on the Territories of Russia Damaged Owing to the Chernobyl Accident
BY0000305 Malignant Neoplasms on the Territories of Russia Damaged Owing to the Chernobyl Accident L.V. REMENNIK, V.V. STARINSKY, V.D. MOKINA, V.I. CHISSOV, L.A. SCHEPLYAGINA, G.V. PETROVA, M.M. RUBTSOVA Moscow A. Herzen Cancer Research Institute, 2nd Botkinsky proezd, 3, 125284 MOSCOW, Russia Abstract The work presents the results of descriptive analysis of development of oncoepidemiological situation in six of the most polluted regions owing to the Chernobyl accident in 1981-1994. The growth of malignancies incidence is marked in all territories as well as in the Russian Federation as a whole. The most adverse tendencies have been revealed in the Bryansk, Orel, Ryazan regions. It is marked that the formation of a structure, levels and trends of the malignancies incidence has been occurring under influence of a complex of factors usual up to the accident. The analysis of the data from the specialized cancer-register evidences that the incidence of thyroid malignancies is actively growing in the population of the Bryansk region. The probability of connection of growth of the thyroid cancer incidence in children of the Bryansk region with the Chernobyl accident is reasonably high, but should be confirmed through the application of methods of analytical epidemiology. 1. Introduction The increase in risk of development of malignancies is one of the most probable effects of ionizing radiation on populations living on radioactively polluted territories. In the Russian Federation the most polluted by radionuclides owing to the Chernobyl accident are the territories of the Bryansk, Kaluga, Orel, Tula, Ryazan, Kursk regions. The study of dynamics of the oncological incidence in the population of these territories in view of the background tendencies that were determined up to the accident appears to be urgent.
[Show full text]
Playing Panpipes in Southern Russia: History, Ethnography, and Performance Practices
INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type o f computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely aflfect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6” x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI A Bell & Howell Infonnation Company 300 North Zed) Road, Ann Aibor MI 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 NOTE TO USERS The original manuscript received by UMI contains pages witFi slanted print. Pages were microfilmed as received. This reproduction is the best copy available UMI PLAYING PANPIPES IN SOUTHERN RUSSIA: HISTORY, ETHNOGRAPHY, AND PERFORMANCE PRACTICES VOL.
[Show full text]
LYUDINOVO» Ermolino 1 Special Economic Zone Obninsk
RELIABILITY INNOVATIONS PARTNERSHIP 2015 Moscow 2 REGION IN THE HEART Moscow OF RUSSIA Region Total area 2 29,900 km Smolensk Region Kaluga Population in the region 1,01 million + 20 million in 180 kilometers' vicinity Tula Region Bryansk Kaluga region Oryol region 3 DEPOSITS Moscow AND RESOURCES Region Resources 559 45% of the territory Non-metallic are covered mineral deposits by forests Brown coal, chalk and gypsum, clay, sand and breakstone 188 13 Fresh groundwater Deposits deposits of various types of mineral water 4 WE PRODUCE Moscow AND DEVELOP Region 1 2 3 4 Cars and trucks Steam and gas Railway construction Locomotives turbines and maintenance 5 6 7 8 Cast-iron Construction Radio- Pharmaceutical and steel work materials electronics products 9 10 11 12 Paper Furniture and other Logistics IT and woodwork goods 5 OBNINSK — Moscow A CITY OF Region SCIENCE Nuclear power Composite Radiation engineering materials medicine 6 NATIONAL INVESTMENT Moscow CLIMATE RATING Region I KALUGA REGION Kaluga is the best city in terms of 7 INVESTMENT Moscowregistration of a new company Region POLICY Doing Business Best conditions Development for business institutions Project support at the Agency for Regional federal level Development Kaluga Region Tax benefits Development Corporation Kaluga Region representative office in Moscow Legislative warranties Industrial Logistics Free project Support Agency for Innovative Development Center for Cluster Development 8 INFRASTRUCTURE Moscow FOR BUSINESS Region Moscow Region Moscow «LYUDINOVO» Ermolino 1 special
[Show full text]
Total Starts Hi-Tech Production of Lubricating Oils in Russia
09 2 РубрикаContents 3 Industrial policy instruments р. 32 FACTS AND FIGURES 24. K-AGRO INDUSTRIAL PARK TRANSPORTATION 6. KALUGA REGION. GENERAL 26. KALUGA SPECIAL ECONOMIC AND LOGISTICS COMPLEX INFORMATION ZONE (SEZ) 38. HIGH-QUALITY TRANSPORTATION AND 8. ECONOMY. CORE INDICATORS 30. TPSED (TERRITORY OF PRIORITY SOCIO-ECONOMIC LOGISTICS INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT) SOLUTIONS FOR BUSINESS HUMAN RESOURCES 10. ADVANTAGES OF DOING 40. HUMAN RESOURCES FOR BUSINESS IN THE REGION SUPPORT MEASURES INDUSTRIAL GROWTH 12. PROMISING INVESTMENT 25. PREFERENCES SECTORS AND BENEFITS FOR INDUSTRIAL DIGEST 16. SINGLE WINDOW PARKS' RESIDENTS 42. INVESTMENT ACTIVITY 28. PREFERENCES AND EXPERT OPINION BENEFITS FOR SEZ RESIDENTS OPENING 18. PROJECT LEGAL SUPPORT 31. PREFERENCES AND 48. TOTAL STARTS HI-TECH BENEFITS FOR TPSED PRODUCTION OF LUBRICATING RESIDENTS OILS IN RUSSIA INVESTMENT SITES 32. INDUSTRIAL POLICY TOOLS 36. TAX BENEFITS 19. PROJECT LEGAL SUPPORT 20. VORSINO INDUSTRIAL PARK BUSINESS 21. VORSINO-WEST INDUSTRIAL 37. BCS IN KALUGA. NEW PARK INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES 22. ROSVA INDUSTRIAL PARK FOR INDIVIDUALS 23. GRABTSEVO INDUSTRIAL 50. SBERBANK DEVELOPING PARK ECOSYSTEM PUBLISHED BY THE AGENCY FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF KALUGA REGION SINCE 2010 PUBLICATION OF THE MINISTRY Editor Design ADVERTISING FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Tatiana Antipova Rodion Nedorezov Elena Bochenkova +7 (910) 609-74-21, +7 (910) 606-00-50, +7 (910) 915-00-58, OF KALUGA REGION [email protected] rodion-nedorezov@ [email protected] All rights to information, photo materials and
[Show full text]
On Turnover of Agricultural Lands” of 24.07.2002 № 101-FZ (As Amended)
Paragraph-by-paragraph commentary and practice of Federal Law "On Turnover of Agricultural Lands” of 24.07.2002 № 101-FZ (as amended). The advantage of this issue is that the authors were directly involved in developing and passing the law in review and have experience in practical application thereof in the Kursk and Voronezh Regions. The book contains the full text of the current version of the Federal Law as amended of July 7, 2003, June 29, October 3, and December 21, 2004, March 7 and July 18, 2005, paragraph-by-paragraph commentary thereof as well as samples of documents applied in practice and may prove useful for officers working at state legislative and executive agencies and municipal entities, managers of agricultural organizations and farming enterprises, owners of land shares and owners of personal subsidiary shares, as well as for anyone involved in the real estate business. Federal Law of 24.07.2002 № 101-FZ (as amended of July 7, 2003, June 29, October 3, December 21, 2004, March 7, July 18, 2005) «On Turnover of Agricultural Lands” Paragraph-by-paragraph commentary and practice (third edition, revised and expanded) Writing team of the commentary on the Federal Law "On Turnover of Agricultural Lands" G.V. Kulik, State Duma Deputy, Chairman of the State Duma Committee on Agriculture, honoured economist of the RSFSR, RANS academician (Russian Academy of Natural Sciences) – (preamble); N. I. Kalinin, deputy head of the secretariat of the State Duma Committee on Agriculture, honoured land surveyor, first-class public counsellor of the Russian Federation, lawyer – (introduction, comments to Article 8, sections III and IV);- O.N.
[Show full text]
FIRST SECTION CASE of LM and OTHERS V. RUSSIA
FIRST SECTION CASE OF L.M. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 40081/14, 40088/14 and 40127/14) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 15 October 2015 This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision. L.M. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA JUDGMENT 1 In the case of L.M. and Others v. Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: András Sajó, President, Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, Julia Laffranque, Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque, Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos, Erik Møse, Dmitry Dedov, judges, and Søren Nielsen, Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 22 September 2015, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1. The case originated in three applications (nos. 40081/14, 40088/14 and 40127/14) against the Russian Federation lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a stateless Palestinian from Syria, L.M., and two Syrian nationals, A.A. and Mr M.A. (“the applicants”), on 29 and 30 May 2014 respectively. The President of the Section decided that the applicants’ names should not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 3 of the Rules of Court). 2. The applicants were represented by Ms N.Y. Golovanchuk, a lawyer practising in Moscow. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr G. Matyushkin, Representative of the Russian Federation at the European Court of Human Rights. 3. The applicants alleged, in particular, that their return to Syria would be in breach of their rights guaranteed by Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention, and that their detention in Russia had been in breach of Articles 3 and 5 of the Convention.
[Show full text]
BR IFIC N° 2639 Index/Indice
BR IFIC N° 2639 Index/Indice International Frequency Information Circular (Terrestrial Services) ITU - Radiocommunication Bureau Circular Internacional de Información sobre Frecuencias (Servicios Terrenales) UIT - Oficina de Radiocomunicaciones Circulaire Internationale d'Information sur les Fréquences (Services de Terre) UIT - Bureau des Radiocommunications Part 1 / Partie 1 / Parte 1 Date/Fecha 10.03.2009 Description of Columns Description des colonnes Descripción de columnas No. Sequential number Numéro séquenciel Número sequencial BR Id. BR identification number Numéro d'identification du BR Número de identificación de la BR Adm Notifying Administration Administration notificatrice Administración notificante 1A [MHz] Assigned frequency [MHz] Fréquence assignée [MHz] Frecuencia asignada [MHz] Name of the location of Nom de l'emplacement de Nombre del emplazamiento de 4A/5A transmitting / receiving station la station d'émission / réception estación transmisora / receptora 4B/5B Geographical area Zone géographique Zona geográfica 4C/5C Geographical coordinates Coordonnées géographiques Coordenadas geográficas 6A Class of station Classe de station Clase de estación Purpose of the notification: Objet de la notification: Propósito de la notificación: Intent ADD-addition MOD-modify ADD-ajouter MOD-modifier ADD-añadir MOD-modificar SUP-suppress W/D-withdraw SUP-supprimer W/D-retirer SUP-suprimir W/D-retirar No. BR Id Adm 1A [MHz] 4A/5A 4B/5B 4C/5C 6A Part Intent 1 109013920 ARG 7156.0000 CASEROS ARG 58W28'29'' 32S27'41'' FX 1 ADD 2 109013877
[Show full text]
“Maloyaroslavetsky Pilot-Plant Factory” OJSC General Director— Romanov
“Maloyaroslavetsky pilot-plant factory” OJSC General Director— Romanov Oleg Olegovitch “MOPAZ” OJSC 249096, the Kaluga region, Maloyaroslavets city, Kirova-street, 1 Phone:(48431) 2-68-90 [email protected], www.mopaz.ru Maloyaroslavetsky pilot-plant factory “MOPAZ” OJSC. In 2012 the factory celebrates its 88th birthday. The factory began its business in 1924 and bore the name “Krasny metallist” work association . Nowadays “MOPAZ” is a modern machine factory producing high-quality garage equipment for car-service centers and equipment for NGV refueling compressor stations. The territory of “MOPAZ” OJSC amounts over 50.000 m2. The manufacturing workshops are situated on area over 3.000 m2. On the territory of the factory are placed: boiler-house, cast shop, machine, assembly, galvanizing and transport shops. There are also section of mechanical rubber goods, section of plant engineer, blank section, guaranteed power supply system, painting section. The convenient location of the factory at the intersection of the most important traffic arteries of Kyiv and Warsaw highways and railway allows to ship goods by truck and railway transport. The main products of “MOPAZ” OJSC is a diagnostic, adjustment and maintenance equipment for fuel equipment of diesel engines, manufactured under the registered trademark “Doctor Diesel”. This equipment allows: - To recover the nominal motor power and its thrust characteristics, - To improve the fuel economy (to 25%), - To bring the technical facilities in accord to environmental requirements. Our products have proved itself good in “price-quality” relationship and are significantly cheaper than import analogues. The products are confirmed for equipping service sections for diesel fuel equipment such manufacturers as Yaroslavl Diesel Equipment Plant (“YAZDA” OJSC), Yaroslavl Fuel Equipment Plant (“YAZTA” OJSC), Yaroslavl Motor Plant (“Autodiesel” OJSC) and many other.
[Show full text]
WCER Problems of Reforming Local Self Governance
Consortium for Economic Policy Research and Advice WCER Canadian Association Institute Working Academy International of Universities for the Economy Center of National Development and Colleges in Transition for Economic Economy Agency of Canada Reform Problems of Reforming Local Selfgovernance: Structural and Financial Aspects Moscow 2005 УДК 352+336.132.11 ББК 65.050.2+65.261.8 P93 Problems of Reforming Local Selfgovernance: Structural and Financial Aspects. M.: IET, 2005. P. 421. Agency CIP RSL Team leader – I. Starodubrovskaya Authors: Chapters 1, 6–7, Introduction, Conclusion – I. Starodubrovskaya; Chapter 2 – I. Starodubrovskaya, M. Slavgorodskaya, T. Letunova; Chapters 3, 4 – M. Slavgorodskaya; Chapter 5 – I. Starodubrovskaya, M. Slavgorodskaya; Chapter 8 – I. Starodubrovskaya, N. Mironova; Chapter 9 – E. Slack, Consulting Inc., Canada; Chapters 10, 12 – H. Kitchen, Department of Economics, The Trent University, Canada; Chapter 11 – G. Gaboury, F. Vaillancourt, Department of Economics, The University of Montreal, Canada. The paper considers territorial models of local selfgovernance that had emerged in Russian regions prior to the reform and their impact on various aspects of municipal establishments' activities. The authors evaluate the regional law in the area of local selfgovernance and interbudgetary relations and consider issues associated with the rise and emergence of territorial foundations of the institute in question until 2003. The authors also analyze reforms undertaken in RF regions in 2004 that addressed the problem of a new territorial structure of local selfgovernance. Individual chapters highlight on international experiences in the area of organization and financing of local administrations. JEL Classification: H11, H70, H77, K10. Editors: Glavatskaya N., Mezentseva K., Serianova S.
[Show full text]
Resolution # 784 of the Government of the Russian Federation Dated July
Resolution # 784 of the Government of the Russian Federation dated July 17, 1998 On the List of Joint-Stock Companies Producing Goods (Products, Services) of Strategic Importance for Safeguarding National Security of the State with Federally-Owned Shares Not to Be Sold Ahead of Schedule (Incorporates changes and additions of August 7, August 14, October 31, November 14, December 18, 1998; February 27, August 30, September 3, September 9, October 16, December 31, 1999; March 16, October 19, 2001; and May 15, 2002) In connection with the Federal Law “On Privatization of State Property and Fundamental Principles of Privatizing Municipal Property in the Russian Federation”, and in accordance with paragraph 1 of Decree # 478 of the President of the Russian Federation dated May 11, 1995 “On Measures to Guarantee the Accommodation of Privatization Revenues in thee Federal Budget” (Sobraniye Zakonodatelstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 1995, # 20, page 1776; 1996, # 39, page 4531; 1997, # 5, page 658; # 20, page 2240), the Government of the Russian Federation has resolved: 1. To adopt the List of Joint-Stock Companies Producing Goods (Products, Services) of Strategic Importance for Safeguarding National Security of the State with Federally-Owned Shares Not to Be Sold Ahead of Schedule (attached). In accordance with Decree # 1514 of the President of the Russian Federation dated December 21, 2001, pending the adoption by the President of the Russian Federation in concordance with Article 6 of the Federal Law “On Privatization of State and Municipal Property” of lists of strategic enterprises and strategic joint-stock companies, changes and additions to the list of joint-stock companies adopted by this Resolution shall bee introduced by Resolutions of the Government of the Russian Federation issued on the basis of Decrees of the President of the Russian Federation.
[Show full text]